Added: 4 years ago
From: pinkyshow
Views: 2,286,317
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (54,381)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Benjamin Franklin:

    "Why should the Palatine Boors [Germans] be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the Exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Languages or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion."

  • legal or illegal are not the right words , was it morally right to invade iraq ,!!! NO

  • @solarstone11 Yes it was morally correct to invade Iraq, because the war against Iraq was a war of revenge. they killed the people in the USA for heaven sake. what you have no feeling for the things that were done to the USA. yep didn't think so

  • Benjamin Franklin:

    "Why should the Palatine Boors [Germans] be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the Exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Languages or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion."

  • @vengencefrom1979

    Still playing that card in a nation that speaks...... English? You need some serious help pal.

  • @rosemarie443

    "a war of revenge" ???

    google pictures: rumsfeld & hussein

    Get your facts straight

  • @sjonzor well i have my facts straight, and the war that was declared on Iraq was out of revenge for stiking the USA you can think what ever you want to think

  • @rosemarie443

    but iraq didnt strike the USA...

    well, i havent heard/read anything like that

    can you be more specific ?

    like, what did they strike and how ?

  • @rosemarie443

    "stiking the USA" ?

    what does that mean =.=

    i thought it was a typo for 'striking'

    but if it wasn't, then explain 'stiking' since i cant find it in any dictionary.

    and you really believe that revenge is a valid reason to start a war ?

    dont you think that every country would be stuck in a perpetual war

    to satisfy their revenge if they could do this ?

  • @sjonzor your first guess was correct. a couple of wars have been started for less than 3000 dead people. they can do so, and have done so.

  • @rosemarie443

    Show me examples

  • @sjonzor WW1 & WW2

  • @rosemarie443

    those were started for imperialistic reasons

  • @sjonzor you see i am trying to keep your brain active. i have 15 blogs to read in a hour and a half. that is what i get paid for, so i do not proof read, and i try and type very fast. but your brain and fill in the real words

  • @rosemarie443

    ofc...and when i do that, u claim that u never said it

    it might be marked as spam, but your retarded accusation can still be read

  • @sjonzor i don't know what you are talking about SPAM??? i have never marked anything as spam, and i do not post spam. what retarded accusations are you talking about are you sure that you are reading my posts, or somebody elses. No those 2 wars were started out of revenge and greed.

  • @sjonzor

    Is that the picture that sealed the deal for Iraq's purchase of military equipment? I seem to recall that Iraq's military comprised of tanks from the USSR and jet fighters from the USSR and France. Does the US make the exocet missiles that Iraq had used against the USS Stark?( fired from a mirage jet fighter) Maybe that was the time the deal for Iraqs WMD manufacturing equip...

  • @sjonzor

    Wait, that isn't right either since over 50% of their equipment was from Germany and another 20% was from France... Imagine that the USSR, Germany and France did the most business with Iraq as far as oil and military equipment and also seemed to have the most objections to the US invasion.... Seems someone doesn't have enough facts....

  • @alfimon

    i dont really know what you're trying to prove

    but i used that picture as an argument to show that

    there were good relations between the US government and Saddam Hussein

    i tried to show rosemarie443 that his/her argument for "a war of revenge" wasn't really justified

  • @sjonzor

    The reasons for the war were very well publicized but everyone who disagrees with it only seem to recall one specific reason. G. W. Bush explained himself pretty well and happened to be wrong on a couple things. The big one which everyone seems to think now days was the sole reason was WMD's. Another reason was the alleged link with 9-11 and Saddam/Iraq. While there is evidence that Saddam let an al qaeda off shoot operate in Northern Iraq killing kurds.

  • @alfimon

    there were 2 reasons for invading iraq

    - to liberate the iraqi people

    - to remove the threat of iraq's WMD's

    there is no evidence between 9/11 and saddam [NIST report claims so]

    also, there are al qaeda off shoots in somalia, morocco, saudi arabia and pakistan

    are the US gonna invade them too ?

  • @sjonzor

    The US conducts operations in Somalia, Pakistan, Yemen and anywhere else they need to. Wasn't Bin Laden killed in Pakistan after he fled US forces in Afghanistan?

  • @alfimon

    i am not talking about 'conducting operations'.

    i am talking about invading countries

    moreover, the US were allowed to that operation as the government of Pakistan approved it

  • @sjonzor

    Iraq posed a much different problem than those other nations. Saddam was the main goal and unlike al qaeda he possessed an entire nation and it's military to back him. Oh and you are also wrong about Pakistan approving the mission against Bin Laden, matter of fact the prime minister complained about the US violating his nations sovereignty.

  • @alfimon well you see that is what friends do, they stab you in the back. Pakistan was supposed to be a friend of the USA, see how that worked

  • @rosemarie443

    What, that a friend aided and protected our enemy? Is that what you're referring to? Something tells me that you might be one of those people who believes the US should be the only nation and people held to any kind of moral standard and anyone opposed to the US gets a free pass....

  • @alfimon rose sounds like shes just your type.

  • @rosemarie443

    My apologies, I misunderstood your post. There are so many blame America first hacks here that I instinctively go on the defensive.

  • @sjonzor

    Anyways, most people who use that photo use it as some proof that Saddam Hussein was some kind of US attack dog when the easily verifiable evidence shows that everyone else armed him for his oil.

  • as of this writing there is still a rogue general capable of firing missiles at the pentagon and getting away with it. it is not far fetched to presume that he will try to get nukes, use them, and then blame iran. its nazi bullsh!t all over again.

  • that is jewish bankers that nazis have blamed for the past 70 years or so for the worlds problems and yet nazis cant go to business school themselves, why do you think that is?

  • @vengencefrom1979

    What's really funny is that you (a nazi) keeps blaming the jews and others who fought against the axis powers of being nazi's.....

  • @alfimon did you ever notice that a lot of christians (if not most) are more jewish than jews? btw, moses was a plagirist and stole the ten commandments from egypts religion to start with. compare with ancient egyptian scrolls.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    So you're not going to bother denying you hate jews more than the nazi's ever did? Instead you're going to start a whole different dance about commandments? You already proved yourself a liar with your Bush was a Nazi fiction, your completely fictional and totally unsubstantiated account of 9-11 so why would anyone start believing your bullshit now? (btw, you're a lousy dancer)

  • @alfimon <<< lol, strawman extremist, watch out for this type. btw, 9/11 - inside job, wtc 7 - the SMOKING GUN!

  • @vengencefrom1979 <--- Jew hater calling nazi's anti-Semites.... Also thinks 9-11 was inside job based on youtube videos... what a maroon....

  • @alfimon <<< not one shred of evidence as to who did 9/11 in more than ten years, nothing on bin laden, noting on al qaeda, nothing on saddam, but lo and behold, wtc 7 is in freefall for all the world to see. inside job from the start and bush is a war criminal.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    Actually you blind fool all the evidence thus far points to radical Islamists being responsible. Confessions in the manner of video tapes found in Afghanistan by the perpetrators to videos of these guys checking in at the ticket counter. The amount of evidence is overwhelming unlike your theory which relies on mickey mouse science and completely overlooking the facts.

  • Rogue Generals that can fire missiles at the pentagon to cover up a 2.3 trillion dollar shortage in the pentagon budget are the greatest threat to the U.S right now. Not two bit dictators which can be taken out with one cruise missile, but Rogue Generals. A couple of years ago it was reported that nukes were accidently flown across the country. I dont believe it was an accident, I believe it was done on purpose to see where red flags popped up.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    NICE!! You think making completely unsubstantiated allegations enough times and people will start to believe you? You have any REAL proof of ANY of your allegations yet? Have you killed off all those hundreds and thousands of pesky witnesses who punch your fantasies full of holes yet?

  • about the only trick left in the book that the right wing hasnt used is the JFK maneuver. watch for it.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    That's the funny thing about you morons. JFK was murdered by a communist retard just like you who snapped.

  • 30 MILLION IRAQIS HAVE DEMOCRACY ,, HOORAY FOR AN ILLEGAL WAR YIPEEEEEEE

  • @why760nitro iraq now has hell on earth and will probably never pull out of it.

  • @why760nitro No they dont. They have a Vichy quilsing government that was voted in through corruption. They have sectarian violence and civil strife. And now all of the nightclubs, all of the bars, all of the christians and jews and another 4 million Iraqi Muslims have fled. We burnt that country to the ground to enslave not to free.

  • @grimblebrumble17889

    OMG! Christians and Jews persecuted in the middle east? Tell me it ain't so! Oh wait, muslims have been at war with everyone else since the inception of Islam.... and you're just noticing it now.... I guess Saddam's refusal to comply with the UN and the sanctions it prolonged had nothing to do with the plight of Iraq? Anyone with any sense sees you for the "blame America first" propaganda hack you are.

  • @alfimon Christians and Jews were not an endangered species in Iraq until the American invasion and subsequent incompetence in maintaining order. If this current disaster was anything to do with saving innocent people then there are far worse than Hussein and his thugs. Now fuck off and grow up you childish cunt. Iraq is worse than it ever was and all for greed.

  • back before pearl harbor was bombed by the japanese then president roosevelt was facing a political dilemma of confronting a country that was one third pro german and pro nazi. these nazi's didnt go away when the u.s. entered WWII, first they enlisted, 'volunteering' for the pacific theatre and after the war? used their medals to further their political aims. hmmmm, that was george bush senior that joined the navy, son of prescott bush, a known nazi. hmmmmmm.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    Uh, Prescott Bush who did business with a guy who was arrested by Nazi's was a nazi? Do you ever bother doing any research? Bush senior who fought against the axis powers? Axis being Japan, Italy and GERMANY? You are so stupid and selective in your facts that you miss the entire picture...

  • @vengencefrom1979

    Reagan was right, you moonbats aren't ignorant, you just know so much that isn't so....

  • @alfimon reagan was a snake in the grass and sided with money changers, not to mention set up saddam in the first place for invasion.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    You still haven't posted a thing to dispel what Reagan said about you bozo's being full of shit.

  • @alfimon What the American invasion ended up doing was creating unprecedented sectarian strife and totally debilitating Iraqi capabilities, thus tilting the regional balance of power in the energy-rich Persian Gulf substantially in favor of Iran.

  • @vengencefrom1979 and now that the USA military has left Iraq, see what has happened. Iraq depended upon the USA for everything, and they want us back, but no way

  • @rosemarie443 they iraqui people dont want usa back asshole only the puppet iraqui goverment wants usa backs cause whitout his support they fall!!!

  • @rosemarie443 Over 250,000 American and other mercenaries working for the US state department and the Vichy Iraqi government are still there.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 I can see from your posts that you have your mind made up about Iraq, but you are wrong. but i can't change you mind other than to tell you to read more and stop being a person that has his head stuck in the wastebasket

  • @vengencefrom1979

    You left out some of the other things the invasion did. Like brought the biggest mass murderer of the region to justice. Kept Al Qaeda preoccupied over there instead of HERE. The list does go on but for now that is adequate....

  • No weapons of mass destruction found. Over a hundred thousand Iraqi deaths, over 4 thousand American deaths, a civil war, close to a trillion dollars spent and counting, deep divisions in America over this ugly war and a nation left shattered. Yes I would say this war was a HUGE mistake and if this kind of disaster happened in the private sector their would of been many arrests of those responsible. But these kinds of disasters are allowed and is common in Government.

  • educational

  • USA USA USA

  • hahahahahah a theocracy good one where did you get that at the mother ship hahahahahahaha

  • @why760nitro <<< obviously an expert in political science.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    So have you moonbats figured out a way to dismiss the fact that the north tower fall on and into WTC 7?

  • @alfimon the reason that the building fell on 9/11 was because of the way they were built, they had no inter support that was why they could sway in the high winds. i guess that you don't really know about the attack of 9/11

  • @rosemarie443

    Maybe you missed the sarcasm on my post... I know the north tower fell after being struck by a 767. I know that WTC 7 fell after the north tower fell on it and it burned for 8 hours.

  • @alfimon plenty of videos on my page in re wtc 7 and not one of them has any raging fires in it. in fact there are NO videos that have any raging fires in wtc 7 because there werent any. you and the whole right wing lied to the american people and will hang for this.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    Oh, I forgot you have secret x-ray videos of the inside of WTC 7. How did you get all those firemen who were there to tell the same lie anyway? Have you stopped smoking and eating paint chips? You are the liar and a fruity ass moonbat to boot...

  • dumb shit war is 2nd nature history is marked by war  get used to it you little tin foil hat cry baby

  • Step 1

    BAGHDAD - Iraqi authorities have issued an arrest warrant for Sunni Muslim Vice-President Tareq al-Hashemi on suspected links to terrorism after the government said it obtained confessions from his bodyguards, an interior ministry spokesman said.

  • WHY are we in the middle east? take a look at wtc 7. its the reichstag all over again.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    Take a look at WTC and watch the North tower fall on it. Then watch as firefighters evacuate it because of the structural damage. Then the funniest part is watching the retards act surprised and like there was a conspiracy when it falls after burning for 8 hours...

  • fuk u cat

  • The US had never won a War since 1945,they just destroy and leaving behind a devastated Country and taking control of their valuable resources.

  • Benjamin Franklin:

    "Why should the Palatine Boors [Germans] be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the Exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Languages or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion."

  • follow the money not the goverment. This war is only a small part in their agenda. America is only the weapon not the operator. Remember Remember the 13 of december. Federal reserve 1913. Follow the MONEY not the goverment. Who benefits i think a wise roman once said. America is only one of its funnels. Discover this learn the truth.

  • @rosemarie443 Sending a WHole country to war because of revenge is not illegal?!?!... and by illegal i mean immorally justified and truly undemocrat!!!??

  • @nyfarida123 well the president had the OK by all of congress. and i think that when youhave been harmed that you have the right to fight back. that is what the USA did. tell me is somebody slapped you in the face, what would you do.

  • @rosemarie443 When you are slapped, the first question you should ask i why did you slap me not fight back. Common reasoning demands that you understand the slappers reasoning before deciding on a course of action to follow.

  • @leoluchzibritannia if i would be slapped on the face my next reaction would be a fist to the jar of the attacker.

  • @rosemarie443

    From that logic, if other countries do what we don't like regardless of reason, we should just wage war all in the name of our interest, right?

  • @leoluchzibritannia like i have posted before the USA only goes where it is asked to help.

  • Comment removed

  • @leoluchzibritannia you sent me a PM, but yes the USA was asked to help all of those countries, but Iraq. that war was started because of revenge for 9/11

  • @rosemarie443 Ops, sorry i didn't know that i sent a pm. Are you serious? Have you ever taken am American history class? The us government does not intervene in other countries to develop democracy, they intervene because of economic or strategic reasons. If they asked us to intervene why don't they like us?

  • @leoluchzibritannia

    If "they don't like us" why 1 mill of legal and (who knows how many millions of illegals) move to US EVERY YEAR?

    How many countries you've been to, to make your own opinion and not just repeat somebody's blabbing?

  • @ssmusic214

    Your points is....we are talking about the war the government is involved in. I have been to 2 countries so that means what? Legal or illegal, does that mean people should be treated like crap because some of them broke the law and some didn't?! You sir are a genius.

  • @leoluchzibritannia The point is qute self evident: the people DO NOT flee by the millions INTO the country that "EVERYBODY HATES".

  • @ssmusic214

    people once believed that the earth was the centre of the universe...and TONS OF PEOPLE held that fact to be self evident. Rather than watching the news, have your ready book that explains immigration and how it affects the united states?

  • @leoluchzibritannia Idiot! Why would I need to watch news or "ready the book" to explain anything to me about immigration in US. I live here! And I lived in 3 other countries before MOVING HERE!

    I can write a book about immigration.

  • @ssmusic214 so? I took algebra in high school and three other math classes before algebra, does that mean that i can write a book about those classes? Are you going to tell me that you can write a book about democracy because you live in a democratic nation? You know about physics because you took some physics class...well? Tell me.

  • @leoluchzibritannia Blabbing Idiot! I can certainly can write a book write a book about difference between living in democratic nation and totalitarian dictatorship.

    And it would be great reading for you.

  • @ssmusic214

    lol my dear, we can all write books about the difference between a democratic and totalitarian nation.

  • @rosemarie443 wasn't it Afghanistan that was invaded as revenge for 9/11? The Afghan invasion took place not one month after the WTC & Pentagon attacks, whilst the Iraqi invasion didn't take place until two years later

  • @qwertyuiop6792 NO it was Iraq.

  • @rosemarie443 in Afghanistan, the primary driver of the invasion was 9/11 with the goal of dismantling Al-Qaeda and ending its use of Afghanistan as a base; Iraq on the other hand was considered a threat to America, through WMD's, which they never had. Claims of Saddam's involvement in 9/11 were falsified. It would be absurd for America to wait a whole two years for revenge for 9/11, when the public at the time were demanding immediate military action

  • @qwertyuiop6792 sorry you are wrong, the did have WMD. they just had 3 months to get rid of them, before the investigators got there. well you see the USA had go thru a few problems before we could declare war on Iraq. immediate military action was not possible i can see that you do not know how our government works

  • @rosemarie443 you are right in that I'm unsure as to how the US government works (I'm from the UK), but it is clear to me that, whether or not Iraq was a response to 9/11 or not, Iraq didn't pose a direct threat to the US, as Saddam Hussain had no connections to al-Qaeda and no WMD's + the US had no permission from the UN to attack - the war therefore, as Kofi Annan has stated, was illegal under international law and domestic law as the UN Charter is part of the constitution as the video states

  • @qwertyuiop6792 well Saddam did have a connection to al-Qaeda, and Iraq had WMD. when a country any country has been attacked it has the right to declare war. which the USA did, the one thing that the president of the USA can do is start a war without declaring a war that has to be OKed by congress.

  • @rosemarie443 you are the busy mis-information shill arent you? saddam had no connections to al qaeda, in fact he is known to have sided with the opposition. plus there were no WMD's to speak of, just a bunch of rusted out crap left over from the war with iran and gulf war 1.

  • @vengencefrom1979 shill????? now yes saddam did have a connection with al qaeda, as well as Iran, and all of the other countries in that part of the country.and there was WMD i have already post about that be a real thing. now you believe what ever you want to believe, but one day maybe you will wake up and find out what the H is going on

  • @rosemarie443 for anyone that has doubts about how much the right wing lies go watch wtc 7. bush did nothing for 7 years but cover up the fact that 9/11 was an inside job to start with. he launched two wars over it and killed more than a million people, and then called it morally superior to anything that saddam has done in the past 40 years. not to mention there is enough depleted uranium in the middle east to keep on killing for millions of years to come.

  • @rosemarie443 Moooooooooooooo! 

  • @vengencefrom1979 you still clinging to thermite wtc somethings never change

    FACT IS your doctored facts dont hold water

  • @vengencefrom1979 IRAQ WAR OFFICIALLY OVER DICTATOR SADDAM IS DEAD YIPPPEEEE 30 million people now have a taste of democracy

  • @why760nitro 30 million people now have a theocracy in which they will struggle with religious domination and 1 miilion dead iraqis for the next 20 years blaming bush and the u.s. this does not bode well. if they had been left alone they would have progressed into the 20th century on their own.

  • @vengencefrom1979 DUMBSHIT 500.000 dead during OUR CIVIL WAR, you are enjoying the benefits of a united counrtry BUT a morin like you must have some kind of guilt about it

  • @rosemarie443 if true, why did the 9/11 commission report find no evidence to suggest that Saddam Hussein had any connections with al-Qaeda? and realistically, a country did not attack the US that day, it was a terrorist group - which makes the War on Terror much more complex

  • @qwertyuiop6792 do you think that the forgein countries are stupid? Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and the other countries in that area, all are housing terriosts. whether they are with al-Qaeda or another group. Yes a country did attack the USA, and we went to war in retalation for it. you can tell youself what ever makes your day. but facts are facts, we went to war in retalation.

  • @rosemarie443 you're blatantly avoiding the point though, Saddam had no links with al-Qaeda or 9/11 and in fact was actively against them - as for WMD's, Iraq was complying once UN Resolution 1441 was enforced, and was willingly destroying weapons, realistically, the crisis should have stopped there, but it was followed by a needless invasion which killed thousands of civilians and troops - you're also pushing to one side that Afghanistan was first and was a result of 9/11 once again

  • @qwertyuiop6792 now can U prove,really prove that Saddam had no links with al-Qaeda, or that he had not part in 9/11. & Iraq did have WMD but mangaed to move them out of the country before we got there to investage. well Obama said that the war in Afghanistan was the good war, which i do not know what he meant by that, but i would like to see every military person brought home & let those countries fight for themselves.not just in Iraq & Afghanistan, but every military person in the entire world

  • @rosemarie443 by the good war, I think he probably means the legal one - and I do agree that war only causes more conflict, as you implied, because it seems that Afghanistan has now become the modern version of Vietnam - just goes to show that people don't learn the lessons of the past

  • Comment removed

  • @rosemarie443 <<< screw loose, but not to worry, some wmd40 will make it even looser.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    You talking about loose screws, that's some pretty good ironic comedy. So do you have any evidence that would hold up in a court of law yet or still basing your fantasy on mickey mouse science and youtube videos?

  • @alfimon the contention here isnt whether or not the anti-iraq war faction has any evidence, the contention is that bush is a war criminal and stands accused of such in world courts. the 'gott mit uns' party is well on its way out.

  • from within is ironic. He was dealing with a civil war. I doubt seriously if he would have hesitated to act to prevent another attack against this country, or against a nation that did not comply with ours and international requirements. His generals would not commit to the war, and many innocent civilians suffered because of their delay. I suppose Lincoln hiring US Grant to win the war, and Grants effective leadership qualifies them both as war criminals using this videos criteria.

  • "war crimes" we have been accused of than the fact that following the fall of the Soviet Union, we are the lone super power. Radical Islamists believe if they can topple the US and Israel they will be free to rule the world. They attacked the WTC in 1993. Was it the result of war crimes commited by US troops in Desert Storm? Where is the UN or congressional comission investigating that? All while under a UN sanctioned war! Your use of the Lincoln quote regarding our destroying ourselves

  • inspection of WMD sites, and engaging US and British aircraft enforcing the no-fly zone, ALL under UN authority! I do not recall the Bush admin ever stating that Iraq was involved with 911. They did reveal AlQaeda agents who were "guests" of the Iraqi govt. in the time frame leading up to 911. The video misses the mark because it either did not know or refused to acknowledge these basic facts! Our potential for a future attack against us has less to do with what has occured in Iraq and any

  • The US has had troops in S. Korea since the early 1950's. The UN approved sending troops after N. Korean aggression. If it were discovered that N. Korea planned an attack against S. Korea or one of their neighbors using nuclear weapons, what should the US response be? Wait for a UN agreement authorizing the use of force? When one is in effect? The same applied to Iraq following Desert Storm. We had a declaration of war in the UN and US. The Iraqis failed to comply with UN requirements regarding

  • the Iraqi war had nothing to do with the 9/11 terrorist attacks that was Afghanistan that was involved with 9/11 because the taliban (the government in power at the time) knowingly allowed Al-queda members to hide within there borders. We just attacked Iraq for personal interest like oil, strategic military bases and other reasons. I do not think that 9/11 was inside job but that the US government began using that excuse to attack other nations they do not like.

  • @harvy174 watch wtc 7, it will change your view completely.

  • @vegetablehead1979 go take your meds you still cant understand common sense

    get out of mommy's basement and get some fresh air whats the percentage of people who fall for you tin foil hat 9-11 garbage ??

  • @why760nitro got any kids? have you shown them wtc 7 yet? did they laugh in your face? they will, and they will laugh for the rest of your life. 9/11 - inside job.

  • @vengencefrom1979

    So your official stance is that only kids understand how 9/11 was an inside job? Have you sought help yet? There are plenty of psychiatrists around who will give you the help and medicine you need.

  • @rosemarie443 how does too many other people owing up to 9/11 not make it an inside job and how does 9/11 relate to the Iraq war. what was the real cause of the Iraq war ? what was the point ? How did invading Iraq make up for the incident 9/11.. the answer the last question , it didn't make up for it .. just aided in the lost of many more innocent lives.So ask yourself again..is it legal? not because a judge said so but bcausee a universal standard of justice says so

  • @politics1okaywhynot just read the post i sent to vengencefrom1979

  • moronic debunkers are always stating things like 'thousands of people saw the planes fly into the wtc'. so fucking what? that doesnt prove shit, its a strawman set up. when will they learn?

  • p.s. 9/11 - inside job. google wtc 7, the SMOKING GUN!

  • iraq war - still illegal and now bush is wanted by international courts for war crimes.

  • @vengencefrom1979 NO Bush is not wanted for anything because the war on Iraq was legal. you are just a hater, and have no real facts to support your hate.9/11 was not a inside job because to many other people own up to doing it. do you reallly understand the word strawman??? i think that you should do a little more reading, and maybe you would understand the war in Iraq

  • @rosemarie443 /watch?v=Z-Y_YyMZUbU this is just for starters, perhaps YOU should back your truck up and go watch wtc 7, it might enlighten you. 9/11 - inside job, iraq war - illegal. afghanisnam war - illegal, in fact, everything bush did was illegal. his oil crony friends driving the price of oil up and wrecking the economy - illegal, and they are in court about that too.

  • @vengencefrom1979 9/11 was not a inside job. now if you believe that then you should live in Iran or Iraq. like i said the war in Iraq was for revenge. i am not really sure why the heck we are in afghanistan, except that they asked the USA for help so we went there. nothing the Bush did was illegal. it is only in your small mind

  • @rosemarie443 yeah rigtht, and 'God' suspended the laws of physics on 9/11 just so wtc 7 could fall in its footprint from fire. go take some more 'stupid' pills. youre batting a thousand.

  • @rosemarie443 i dont care what the blogs say in AU people can now vote there and not be ruled by dictators

    the mid east likes freedom and democracy it doesn't happen unless you fight for it

  • @why760nitro the only thing that i have to say on that issue, is I hope that the people vote for the right person and you can have a country without a dictator.

  • @rosemarie443 I'm not taking sides, coz I think that 9/11 was committed by Islamic terrorists, but, as the video that we're commenting on pointed out, Iraq seems to be illegal under international law, and Americans have committed several war crimes while out there. Besides, 9/11 wasn't anything to do with Iraq - that was mainly focused around Afghanistan anyway

  • illegal 

  • some people are like the greeks in the day of alexander the 'great'. ready to defend sparta but not acknowledging the fact that sparta was full of baby killers.

  • @vengancefrom1979 G'day. Yay Team !

    0och Aye... And t' be sure, the onliest reason them Yanquis "Knew" that the Sad-Man Who's-Insane "had to have" Them thar Alleged WMD's, was that France & England & USA & Pakistan had all kept the Invoices...! Judging him by their own standards, they didn't believe he'd complied with the UN Resolutions. So, they went All-Adolf, with a Blitzkrieg, by the Coalition of the Killing... Kill 'em dead'll win a Medal ! Wave Dat Flag... Ciao.

  • youre so beast. keep rocking on.

  • Just trying to get someone mad lol!!!

  • alfimon i see you met the resident Xpert on unprovable conspiracy theory's

  • USA sucks!!! Lol come at me bro!

  • @knifegun101 OH CANADA 

  • Both illegal & immoral.

  • Benjamin Franklin:

    "Why should the Palatine Boors [Germans] be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the Exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Languages or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion."

  • Comment removed

  • I had to leave 2 sources of information concerning the Iraqi casualties caused by Dubya's LIES ! [GOOGLE] Burying the Lancet Report ... and the children - Nichlas Davies /// [GOOGLE] Iraq's Shocking Human Toll : About 1 Million Killed, 4.5 Million Displaced, 1-2 Million Widows, 5 Million Orphans - John Tirman // or this article for self reflection [GOOGLE] None Dare Call it Genocide - Llewellyn Rockwell [ < he must have had HD Nightster1 in mind when he wrote this article ! ]

  • This site wont allow me to connect words together as a web site , so use your imagination "sorry" I wont be responding to someone who can't differentiate between truths and lies [ as dubya bush ] anymore !

  • [continued] considered the case that Powell had presented a FARCE ! Buddy you must be an American still Living a LIE as 90% of you do ! Do you remember the incubator baby deaths in Kuwait ??? ANOTHER LIE !! Visit my community Photo site [GOOGLE] Pictures by beyond rage - photo bucket.com Show some class by telling the truth !

  • [ would't let me post the last name of the legal prosecutor ] [continued > ] invasion by his forces . Their response " They had no position " //// Where did you get the figure of 2 million deaths Saddam was responsible for !?? Did you mean the combat deaths in the Iraq / Iran war which both the USA and Israel supported by supplying satellite photo's revealing either sides troops for their use ! [ America the Great Manipulator ! ] Odd when you mention Hans Blix ! Wasn't it he that

  • [continued] [ a renowned legal prosecutor ] /// [GOOGLE] Bush administrations lies about Iraq - news lies.org [ < one word ] /// [GOOGLE] Uncovered - the Whole truth about the Iraq War [[ some very high profile individuals testifying to the Bush administrations lies ]] /// [GOOGLE] Hidden Wars of Desert Storm - you tube.com [[ there is some footage concerning Saddam having asked the question [ via military representatives ] of the US administration position of the possible

  • [continued ] >  trumped up charge [to discredit him ] of sex with an under aged girl ! Do a large portion of the respondents live in a fantasy !!?? Concerning W. Bush being an honest outstanding president ? You make me wanna puke ! The moment he opens his mouth a lie leaves it ! [GOOGLE] How to make an american angry // [GOOGLE] The Prosecution of George Bush for Murder - Vincent