Many Worlds Interpretation

[Ironjagg]

i believe it you dont believe it ..there we create alternate reality.

[pacmasterjr]

i truthfully think this to be true i just never realized anyone else thought so to.

at least im not alown on that one

[SocialPromotionTips]

These alternative worlds do not exist in the same time as us, but in separate universes arising out of separate big bangs. Big bang, big crunch, big bang, for all eternity, everything that can possibly happen has already happened an infinite amount of times, and will continue to happen an infinite amount of times, in an almost infinite amount of different variations of our universe, but unless I'm missing something, these other universes aren't happening now.

[badbeatbri3]

@SocialPromotionTips

You are thinking about a cyclical universe, not a multiverse. Michio Kaku, a famous physicist, likens the multiverse to a bubble bath with each bubble being it's own universe. The phenomenon Dark Flow is the only observational evidence I am aware of that there may be a universe next door.

[TheAkbir]

thank you very much, you've genuinely helped me to understand the theory, kudos.

[jonnyvmusic]

so your senior project was to steal verbatim from the "what the bleep do we know" movie ? -_-'

[TheKardboardGeek56]

Mind F***

[deanmullen10]

For all our problems we don't need a god to turn to but we can turn to the infinite copies of ourselves all whom go through the exact same things, have the same concerns and feel the same loneliness, as they will understand you completely.

[thatsanawfulusername]

So technically in one world...my ex and I are still together!

[TheRedRussian10]

well done

[Aphradonis]

Sliders!

[sidneyx2]

of course if many worlds were actually correct, then there wouldn't be an interference pattern because the particle would just pick a slit for each world.

[Ajordan369]

absolutely amazing. great work!

[dillinger9999]

nice video

[mancno1]

This has a pretty bad title coz it hs bits of particle-wave duality(the slit experiment) and the copenhagen interpretation [the cat] and uncertainty {the eye} just thrown in

[Gytax0]

@mancno1 And they all lead to Many Worlds interpretation, so that's nothing bad.

[orgolioitalia1]

@Gytax0 No they imagined/assumed first *without actual knowledge*about the light>>> is made of particles or tiny pieces of matter so the theory is irrational and badly wrong.

[Gytax0]

@orgolioitalia1 They didn't assume that light is made only of particles. Read more about Double-Slit experiment. In one case light or electrons behave like particles, in other case - like waves.

[orgolioitalia1]

@Gytax0  You:

light or electrons?

you assumed light is made of electrons than in other case they assumed that the light is made of photons...what you will call it?

man in your icon once said " I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice"apposite of what you believe.

[Gytax0]

@orgolioitalia1 Wait... What? I never said light is made of electrons. Read my post again. I said they tested electrons and photons in double-slit experiment. Stop lying.

[orgolioitalia1]

@Gytax0 You need to read your comment first:,your words----->...In one case light or electrons...

[Gytax0]

@orgolioitalia1 And? I said " In one case light or electrons behave like particles, in other case - like waves."

That means that in one case electrons behave like particles, in other case like waves. Same holds for photons.

[orgolioitalia1]

@Gytax0 And now they will tell you that photons has Others PARTICLES: watch?v=qb0mWybzUw0

And electron is unseen but it is amazingly a Particles:-)

more: It has no known components or substructure; in other words, it is ***generally thought** to be an elementary particle.

Google it:

1-How electron moves in p orbital?

2-and finally search for quotation-->shut up and calculate.

Do anyone can call it science?

[Gytax0]

@orgolioitalia1 I can't understand what have you written. Sorry. Photon doesn't have other particles, it's a quantum of light, that means it isn't divisible. And we don't yet know what could make an electron, so we call it elementary particle. It's science.

[orgolioitalia1]

@Gytax0 *Photon doesn't have other particles, it's a quantum of light**

Light is made >>>PHOTONS.

AND AS YOU SAID IT'S A QUANTUM ***LIGHT***.

CIRCULAR ARGUMENT IN SIMPLE WORDS LIGHT PHOTONS THAN PHOTONS IS LIGHT.

Let's see what photons are according to "bestofscience">>watch?v=JHVC6­F8SOFc

they will tell you the light is made of photons and photons are gauge Bosons than they will tell you again:: In particle physics, gauge bosons are bosonic ***particles****.

I hope you will grape it now.

[Gytax0]

@orgolioitalia1 I KNOW that light is made of photons, no need to tell me that.

[mancno1]

This has a pretty bad title coz it hs bits of particle-wave duality(the slit experiment) and the copenhagen interpretation (the cat) and uncertainty (the eye) just thrown in

[lostkeychain]

is it possible to one day visit an alternate world

that is the only question i have

[MultiNotaname]

@lostkeychain it matters exactly how our worlds have split

[tyrbolo]

and now ask yourself this question: any given particle has an energy level given

by the einsteinian relationship E=MC2, so the branch into two particles should

be observed as a loss of energy bleeding off into the other universe.

Where does the energy come from to sustain this cosmology ?

[maplebayou1]

@tyrbolo The "splitting" referred to is not a duplication of the particle. The particle eventually transfers the same energy to the screen that was used to create it. No energy is gained or lost. This is an example of how imprecise terminology can cause confusion about QM.

However, in QED, energy can come from "nothing" (actually Heisenberg uncertainty) to create virtual particles for brief periods of time, provided they disappear promptly.

[tyrbolo]

@maplebayou1 LOL the virtual particles are mathematical artifacts

the heisenberg uncertainty is a precise description of the relationship of

measurement of two interrelated quantities. Confusion has always abounded

about QM and I am with Al I think the moon is still there if no one is looking.

[maplebayou1]

@tyrbolo As opposed to energy itself, which is "the capacity to do work"? Sounds like an "artifact" to me. I'm afraid I don't feel real confident about assigning realities to this or that.

[datradeofficial1]

This is too much for my little brain

[spartacandream]

I like the many worlds interpretation, it solves the determinism paradox. If the universe is indeterministic, what if we travel in time? One must first assume you were going to be born, or if you go to the future, that the future is going to occur and we won't be wiped out or something. Which requires determinism. Or am I misunderstanding that?

[Steerpike07]

Being from England, I've no idea what a 'senior exit project' is, but the narrator sounds quite young. This video is an extremely well presented explanation - a complicated theory set out clearly and accurately. I hope Dwarfwarrior got an excellent grade for this!

[JohananRaatz]

Schrodinger's Suicide Experiment: watch?v=ld9ubH-12Dw

[lightspeedius]

Take THAT cat!

[alyncurtis]

otherwise known as the 'measurement problem' in quantum physics

[djrakman]

scheoders cat is not fact or fiction if you wanna believe ask yourself what exactly is real are we real or a figment of some higher beings imagination like god, possibly although the g-word is a shit example of a higher being/dimension maybe we are all our own infinate gods with gods inside gods etc i think of it as some sort of combined parrellel membrane string theory im not a physicist im a chef and hip hop dj so i call it the russian doll theory can someone enlighten me please?

[djrakman]

ah i want the gear he is on!!!!!!

[theloveIypiano]

Thank you for making this video I am very intersted in this but the theory was hard to understand this video outlined it nice a simple

[Cruzc13]

Great VIDEO

[etiennealive]

So this shows that particle beams have "emergend propertys" , you don't need more particles or slits to get more on the other side ?

[etiennealive]

So what I understand is that you don't need more particles or slits to get more on the other side of the particles track ?

[Dwarfwarrior]

the experiment is one particle, two slits, with the only change being a high powered camera to view the particle as it passes. They fire one particle after another, the way the cartoon machine fires the marbles. They don't know what causes single particles to create wave like bands when observed. MWI is just one way of interpreting the data. It's really a very interesting experiment.

Sorry for the late reply.

[etiennealive]

Thanks for your reply.

In a German video series, they show it even works with atoms and even molecules. At the end they try to give an explanation.

We are currently studying this subject, for civil purposes.

[HonkIfYouLoveHonking]

@Dwarfwarrior I thought they created particle like patterns when observed.

[legendary7708]

That actually sounded simple... though a lot of things sound simple to me but a 5 year old could understand that... brilliant

[Dwarfwarrior]

I'm glad that you enjoyed it. I tried to make it as easy to understand as possible.

[b1gr1g]

A wonderful clip! Great work!

[Dwarfwarrior]

Thanks!

[Taylor13002]

im confused, what does the particle thing mean. instruct me

[Dwarfwarrior]

What about the particles are you confused on? Do you mean you're confused about the double slit experiment?

[Taylor13002]

yea, and i dont get what makes it important

[Dwarfwarrior]

It's important because it means the way the particles react is completely different just because it's being observed and scientist don't understand why. MWI is just one way to explain it.

Sorry for replying so late.

[spartacandream]

@Dwarfwarrior Could it be caused by light interacting with the particle? Causing it to then act as matter, as light effects the electrons of an atom when it hits it?

[joebot1]

I am just researching this as we speak, this is a really nice starting point!!!

thank you!

[Dwarfwarrior]

I'm glad it helped ^^

[chezthemighty]

That's really good :D The voice over is informative, the clips and music fit well together, and that last comment was hilarious.

[Dwarfwarrior]

might have to turn the volume up loud. for some reason the volume of the video itself is really low...