Hmm... I'd still prefer a Sundown Monster prototype. Held up to a 120V for 4.5 minutes and came out without a scratch. No coil discoloration, 2328W for nearly 5 minutes and it still worked like brand new. Sundown Ftw!
Comparing a tc lms to a w7 is dumb, not in the same class. And ive heard ssa sundown and all those. They dont really sound better, just more impact with the bass from Bl and other factors. But that doesnt mean I have to be an ass and go around and say something sucks lol
@ManRossDamn Does my channel look like a trolls? get your head out of your ass. At least I dont go around saying something sucks. THATS what a troll does.
The lms ultra, 2000rms, the w7 13 1000 rms. Looks like your the idiot here.
Nga's needa learn to calm their undropped balls! :facepalm: to the troll warrior!
Just an FYI, SSA Icon is rated at 1K RMS, looks like a even run there. The DDZ 3515 runs at 800 watts, so.. Get YOUR head out of your ass before you get wrecked like trash
@caraudioman16 Lol so? Ive seen 13w7 in a SEALED box do a 150 at 40hz vs a guy with 2 12inch rockford fosgate t1s in a ported box that only hit a 147.4.
@funnyface680 haha so? you could buy 2 DC level three or four subwoofers for this price and achieve that high of a score if not louder and have a more durable subwoofer
@funnyface680 Not to sound like a dick but I think it seams unlikely unless it's an extreme car. Especially when W7s are SQ not SPL, I'm not saying it didn't happen, but 150's are harder than you think.
@funnyface680 you left out what the t1's were tuned at... and how much power was on each lol 40hz is getting near the high side of things... where as alot of people that go ported go closer to the 30 hz area... plus jl is overpriced shite personally i have some t1's but am going to fi btl's because the t1's just arent enough :D
@funnyface680 ok yea get me a vid of a single w7 ever hitting a 145 in a sealed i have fucked with w7s for a while and i have only seen a good ported box at 38 hz on 2000 rms not 1000rms burp a 143 and t1s maybe but idk
@caraudioman16 outdated tech? why is it that it hasnt changed in 10 yrs....because its flawless......... you have just lost credibility with the entire "educated" car audio world....obviously not including moron fan boys who say they suck because there too poor to buy something good!
@caraudioman16 they use foam to make the sub more efficient cause it causes less drag on the cone therefor u need less power to make it move but as far as the rest the sub is state of the art and very efficiently designed
@caraudioman16 First off the fact that you mention max power shows that you don't really know what you are talking about. JL's are SQL subs not SPL. If you wanted a sub with amazing power handling, look elsewhere. If you want, arguably the best sound quality, you go with JL. Hey guess what Cerwin Vega uses for their surrounds? Foam, yeah. I'm not even a huge fan of JL but credit is due where it's due. And funnyface, great video!
LMFAO ata W7 being better than a RE XXX.....jl is a good company but buying jl is like spending $1200 at crutchfield for a $600 piece of equipment. Not that people can't afford it, just smart enough to know better.
Jl is too expensive they dont suck there good subs but there are louder subs (same diameter) for the same price Audio Q for one i think boston and kicker are ok for mainstream brands. also fi and DD. my freind blew his w7 lucky he had a warranty but still wouldnt of happened with Digital designs or re or something along the comp brands..
I love how people think the W7 sucks because it is expensive and there are louder 18" subs. I swear you idiots make me laugh. If the W7 "sucks" so bad then there's no way it could be a world-class name and design.
@phattacorider they were "world class" about 7 years ago when they 1st came out. but they never updated the design and have not kept up with the times.
You're right, they never updated their design. But seriously, why would anyone want to change something that works, and works really well? The only changes JL could do to the W7 while making it better than it is now is giving it a 7" voice coil, carbon fiber cone and dust cap, neo magnet, and a 1ohm configuration. The reasons so many manufacturers keep changing their designs is because they 1) couldn't get it right the first time or 2) are more worried about cosmetic appeal.
wrong lol. a 7" voice coil wouldnt be an upgrade. a CF cone isnt needed on a woofer like this and neo magnets loose power over a shorter period of time. what other companies are looking into is the pole piece. lots of upgrades can be made to that alone.
The only downfall of a 7" voice coil would be the required amount of power to run it, I was exaggerating with 7"...(that's what she said). A 4" voice coil on the W7 would be a good idea, at least on the 12 and 13W7. CF wouldn't be a structural improvement but using CF would be lighter and stronger than using the plastic that's currently used. The only thing they really could do with the pole piece would be to use a more dense material and create a stronger mag field for the VC to react against.
GO JL AUDIO, F**K you haters who can't afford one. I went with an RE XXX because everyone says the speaker is underrated and with the same power to it(2x JL 1000/1) the W7 outperformed to RE in volume and quality
Maybe if the RE XXX ad more power it would have been able to outperform th W7. Not everyone can wants to run 15,000 watts in their car. I think JL W7 is more than worth the cost.
yeah, it's mainly power and box design so either could win. A JL W7 would easy beat a RE XXX at SQ cause a XXX is SPL and W7 is SQ. But it all depends on the box and the power. I only say that they are over priced because a retail of $439.95 for a 8" is quite alot and so are the bigger ones. Oh well, they look nice and sound nice and make bass so i don't really mind :-)
@ bassl0va -- An XXX in the right install sounds just as good, if not better than a W7 and can get MUCH louder in the process. I've owned both and u can check my vids if u want some proof. There IS such thing as SQL. In the audio world it's termed "Sound Pressure Level with Quality"...
@Bsktbll895 Im not saying a XXX doesnt sound good, im saying its way louder than a W7. and that a W7 isn't made for SPL, it's made for SQ. You cant get loud and quality with one woofer, you can get a bit of both, but not full on loud and quality.
If both subs were setup in their PERFECT install environments, the XXX would outperform the W7 in every area hands down. When the XXX was first released in the early 2000's it was widely acclaimed the best subwoofer on the planet because of it's newly engineered XBL2 motor.
@NYClife09 SORRY BUD BUT W7 BEEN AROUND FOR 10 YEARS AND ITS RULED THE MARKET FOR PPL WITH A BRAIN SINCE.......NOTHING COMPARES TO SQ/SPL split 50/50% mainaining both aspects
Yes i have and if you look at there products all of the sub lines have been modified heavily over the last couple years
JL doesnt change the W7 because it set the reference levels for SQ and cost and has been at the front of Subwoofer technology for 10+ years now.............A chevy 350ci has been the HP measurement for 50years now maybey you can argue that too!!!!!!!!
Yes i have and if you look at there products all of the sub lines have been modified heavily over the last couple years
JL doesnt change the W7 because it set the reference levels for SQ and cost and has been at the front of Subwoofer technology for 10+ years now.............A chevy 350ci has been the HP measurement for 50years now maybey you can argue that too!!!!!!!!
Ok were talking about car audio not engine refrences....anyway the w7 needs a redesign anyway....it only uses one spider, which is pathetic. Not saying its a bad woofer, but there is better. JL is good at marketing and getting their product out there to be seen. Other companies like Audiopulse/Tc Sounds, RE audio, Fi/AA, Audioque, do not do that so those savings are past onto the consumer through a better product, at better priced to perfromance ratio
can you tell us what it is? or r u just gona sit their and talk shit like you know something. And it do matter how much the excursion is, subs need to move air to create bass just like every other speaker, Thats y tweeters have no excursion visible by the human eye.
What makes you think I'm "talking shit".... Why are you on my shit?
When the Voice coil moves out of the magnetic gap, the motor looses magnetic force, alot of things happen, mostly distortion. I know why tweeters "have no excursion".... Well they do, just not very much, because higher frequencies are more audible compared to lowers frequencies..
Simple shit here, common knowlege when you compete ect ect. A quick google search will yeild plenty info....
I'm to fucking tired to argue with people tonight. Any company that markets their woofers advertising how much excursion their woofers have.... Like Audiobhan, are full of shit.
At least the JLW7 uses a variable density voice coil to help maintain, linear excursion, and motor force. Audiobahn did just about nothing.... Their excursion was just like there power handling... Grossly over rated, and to bad the W7 uses a single progressive spider.. That bitch will sag. Efficiency > excursion.
I understand what you are trying to say, but come on... How much does a progress spider cost really? You cant tell me an extra spider would jump the cost of a W7 as much as a full DD3500 recone.
The w7 does not need an extra spider anyway... maybe a better one, but it performs. The W7 has its flaws like anything else, but regardless of things, The price of the W7, and JL in general is hard to justify.
JL did the smartest thing with the W7. They gave it optimal performance and gave it an "image". That brought up the only problem with the W7, it costs WAY too much for that "image". I've mainly owned Rockford and MTX equipment and I will say the same things that make Alpine, Kicker, RE, Fi, and DD fans have said: the W7 just isn't worth THAT much. Of course it could be better, like twin spider suspension, outward mounting holes, or rubber surround. But that's why there are other makers.
I never liked JL audio.. Thier performance isnt bad but the main reason why i will never buy them bec theres no mounting hole to get it easier and im not going to waste my time taking the ring off and remove the foam to just get to the screws thats the most stupid plan they ever did.. and thier foam dont last at all you got to replace it down the road i pefer to buy subs thats rubber not foam. they cost too much for both image and performance period.
I've seen rubber surrounds wear away from heat and cold but not as quickly as foam. The inward mounting holes do make it an inconvenience for your average user especially since the sub is quite heavy. My thing with it is you'd have to create some weird contraption just to mount it with the magnet out. But what's smart about inward mounting holes is the end of the surround is at the end of the frame, leaving more room for better surround structure and more room for cone surface area.
yea I know but still dont like them lol but have u heard of armor all? that makes the rubber out last everything i use them on my subs since they are rubber and plastic its 5 years old and still looks brand new out of box when i bought it. my other friend has this jbl gt thats 9 years old and its rubber and plastic still running strong! my other frined has jl w3 he had to buy the foam 3 times he said its junk so i replaced it for him by installing rubber for it and lasted him 4 years no plm
ROFL, of all the things I use Armorall for, I honestly never thought to use it on my subs. Hell, I use Armorall wipes to clean my hands, shoes, computer, RC cars, and sometimes to clean and shine my interior, but for the subs that actually sounds quite neat!
LOL it works great! give it a try u will be impressd of how new it makes the sub looks I've used it all my life just dont use it on subs that's foam or paper it will weaken it lol
Check out the JL Audio Fathom home subwoofer. It uses a reconditioned W7 driver. When they first hit the market, audio enthusiasts were skeptical because JL Audio did car audio, which is notorious for sounding like crap. But, they're minds quickly changed when they heard them, and now the Fathom is regarded as one of the best subs out there, and competes with other home subs costing much, much more; and at $3700 for the 13 in. model, it's a freaking bargain for how well it performs.
@ihaterabbits127 NO look it up on youtube then reply to my comment. stupid ass.
longtrenton 1 month ago
@ihaterabbits127 Its called woofer porn look it up.
longtrenton 1 month ago
this is like a porno to me :)
MRsublover101 3 months ago
horney jbl
applefanXXX 4 months ago
Lol
XXSMASH951XX 4 months ago
SUBWOOFER PORN!
Iwantapplez109 5 months ago 5
name song?pleas
giuseppe1rapper 5 months ago
Why do you need 3 1/2 inches of excursion? That's useless...my old Infinity Sm-120 has just 1 1/2 inches and it's still making the house shake...
Schirmi195 6 months ago
Hmm... I'd still prefer a Sundown Monster prototype. Held up to a 120V for 4.5 minutes and came out without a scratch. No coil discoloration, 2328W for nearly 5 minutes and it still worked like brand new. Sundown Ftw!
jareddickey87 6 months ago
masturbing woofer
LuisGdj 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I want this as my wallpaper!!!
seemeeatme 6 months ago
this is a example of you and your mum last night :P
jaiden270274 7 months ago
nice woofer porn and does anyone know what the song is
18Fibtl 9 months ago
this is fake. It is just a compilation of pics with the sub at it's best moments.
WinXPwhiz 10 months ago 8
@WinXPwhiz No it isnt? wtf you talkin about?
funnyface680 9 months ago 33
@funnyface680 LOL
BobbysBongSpot 8 months ago
@funnyface680 its a high speed shot... its on JL's website
PaKtiV1 7 months ago
@WinXPwhiz ur retarded
SOUTHERNOUTDOORSMAN1 8 months ago
@WinXPwhiz it's called slowmotion little kid
perry244 6 months ago
@WinXPwhiz this it real,,,,,
TheSleepermgm 6 months ago
@WinXPwhiz either way it still flexes like hes saying it is idiot? lol
Marshmallow250f 6 months ago
@WinXPwhiz What do you think a video is. Just a bunch of pictures played back after each other.
kolton5543 1 month ago
am really sorry but......it looks like an ass hole!
ABLACKX 10 months ago
this subs only 3 1/2 inch of excursion not no damn 4". read the dedcription
Dantedijon 10 months ago
wooow thats fcucken crazy this woofer is $ though if i could afford it i would buy it
BassPounderX 11 months ago
Woofer pron!!!!!!!!
DDFJ1230 11 months ago
Alguien me puede desir como se llama esa cansion ?
milichetas 1 year ago
Realm of excursion.
Saaguu1 1 year ago
it better than xnxx
streeatbeat97 1 year ago
it is sex!
BAkowHeckler 1 year ago
Man JL sucks..
ManRossDamn 1 year ago
@ManRossDamn For what reason LOL. other then you just being a fan boy of some other brand.
tom58c 1 year ago
@tom58c Pretty damn straight forward.
Go research you mindless troll.
TC Sounds LMS Ultra sounds better, and is plently louder.
Along with DD's, Sundown Audio, SSA Xcon's, Incriminator Audio, and many others
ManRossDamn 1 year ago
@ManRossDamn Troll? who said anything about that?
Comparing a tc lms to a w7 is dumb, not in the same class. And ive heard ssa sundown and all those. They dont really sound better, just more impact with the bass from Bl and other factors. But that doesnt mean I have to be an ass and go around and say something sucks lol
tom58c 1 year ago
@tom58c Damn you're dumb.
They sound tons better tuned correctly and put into the right box.
For the gay ass price of 900$ I can buy much more that sounds much better.
And correction, they are in the same class.
It's like saying the FI Q isn't in the same class even though they're both 1K Rms.
Damn troll
ManRossDamn 1 year ago
@ManRossDamn Does my channel look like a trolls? get your head out of your ass. At least I dont go around saying something sucks. THATS what a troll does.
The lms ultra, 2000rms, the w7 13 1000 rms. Looks like your the idiot here.
tom58c 1 year ago
@tom58c Damnnn you're dumb.
Fucking Trolling ass e-thugs these days.
Nga's needa learn to calm their undropped balls! :facepalm: to the troll warrior!
Just an FYI, SSA Icon is rated at 1K RMS, looks like a even run there. The DDZ 3515 runs at 800 watts, so.. Get YOUR head out of your ass before you get wrecked like trash
ManRossDamn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ManRossDamn listen to yourself dude, listen to your self. And you call me a troll? You have no idea about the actualy workings of audio do you?
tom58c 1 year ago
@ManRossDamn yeah man, not as good as your subwoofer you made right?... oh... sorry...
balisongman07 11 months ago
yeah and orion hcca 12 has 4 inches o excursion.
MrRobban1234 1 year ago
wow thats excursion!!!!
antonio64284 1 year ago
what is this song?
walkingfreak 1 year ago
thats what happens to my girlfriends asshole when im nailing it..
greenrolaids 1 year ago
masturbating?
vanjastanic 1 year ago 20
thats cool
mike66479 1 year ago
thats the motion i make when i ****
live4football31 1 year ago
speaker-porn
Mrtechux 1 year ago
Wtf is this fake or something because if you pause right as the cone moves to the very top, you can see that the cone is part of the surround.
david96888 1 year ago
yay for speaker porn!!!
combover1234 1 year ago
butthole flex!
madmkila1 1 year ago
Comment removed
caraudioman16 1 year ago
@caraudioman16 Thanks for stopping by! ASSHOLE!!
funnyface680 1 year ago
Comment removed
caraudioman16 1 year ago
@caraudioman16 Lol so? Ive seen 13w7 in a SEALED box do a 150 at 40hz vs a guy with 2 12inch rockford fosgate t1s in a ported box that only hit a 147.4.
funnyface680 1 year ago
@funnyface680 haha so? you could buy 2 DC level three or four subwoofers for this price and achieve that high of a score if not louder and have a more durable subwoofer
mattintc 1 year ago
@funnyface680 cool story bro!
bassl0va 1 year ago
@bassl0va Thaaanks
funnyface680 1 year ago
@funnyface680 Not to sound like a dick but I think it seams unlikely unless it's an extreme car. Especially when W7s are SQ not SPL, I'm not saying it didn't happen, but 150's are harder than you think.
bassl0va 1 year ago
@funnyface680
LOLz, fo realz?
Hell no, this sub isn't meant for SPL;, that's why a lot of woofers beat the W7.
A single 13w7 will never do a 150. never never never, and certainly not on a Tremlab.
epiphonesg007 1 year ago
@funnyface680 you left out what the t1's were tuned at... and how much power was on each lol 40hz is getting near the high side of things... where as alot of people that go ported go closer to the 30 hz area... plus jl is overpriced shite personally i have some t1's but am going to fi btl's because the t1's just arent enough :D
Wag3x 1 year ago
@funnyface680 ok yea get me a vid of a single w7 ever hitting a 145 in a sealed i have fucked with w7s for a while and i have only seen a good ported box at 38 hz on 2000 rms not 1000rms burp a 143 and t1s maybe but idk
tristincole07 1 year ago
@caraudioman16 outdated tech? why is it that it hasnt changed in 10 yrs....because its flawless......... you have just lost credibility with the entire "educated" car audio world....obviously not including moron fan boys who say they suck because there too poor to buy something good!
smokeymasterjedi 1 year ago
@caraudioman16 they use foam to make the sub more efficient cause it causes less drag on the cone therefor u need less power to make it move but as far as the rest the sub is state of the art and very efficiently designed
wfw5607 1 year ago
@caraudioman16 Your wrong. its rated a 1500 rms so the max it can handle is 3000 watts.
nunucpt 1 year ago
@nunucpt really numb nuts, because if you go to their site it sure as hell doesn't say that.
caraudioman16 1 year ago
@caraudioman16 so u saying that jl audio sucks?
nunucpt 1 year ago
@caraudioman16 First off the fact that you mention max power shows that you don't really know what you are talking about. JL's are SQL subs not SPL. If you wanted a sub with amazing power handling, look elsewhere. If you want, arguably the best sound quality, you go with JL. Hey guess what Cerwin Vega uses for their surrounds? Foam, yeah. I'm not even a huge fan of JL but credit is due where it's due. And funnyface, great video!
mc430ftjesus 1 year ago
@caraudioman16 you say that because u cant afford it douche bag........
smokeymasterjedi 1 year ago
LMFAO ata W7 being better than a RE XXX.....jl is a good company but buying jl is like spending $1200 at crutchfield for a $600 piece of equipment. Not that people can't afford it, just smart enough to know better.
Purdysik 1 year ago
you guys are all fuckhead noobs
guitar1111111 1 year ago 3
Jl is too expensive they dont suck there good subs but there are louder subs (same diameter) for the same price Audio Q for one i think boston and kicker are ok for mainstream brands. also fi and DD. my freind blew his w7 lucky he had a warranty but still wouldnt of happened with Digital designs or re or something along the comp brands..
FORDGTFANATIC 1 year ago
I love how people think the W7 sucks because it is expensive and there are louder 18" subs. I swear you idiots make me laugh. If the W7 "sucks" so bad then there's no way it could be a world-class name and design.
phattacorider 1 year ago
@phattacorider they were "world class" about 7 years ago when they 1st came out. but they never updated the design and have not kept up with the times.
skittlesRgood182 1 year ago
@skittlesRgood182
You're right, they never updated their design. But seriously, why would anyone want to change something that works, and works really well? The only changes JL could do to the W7 while making it better than it is now is giving it a 7" voice coil, carbon fiber cone and dust cap, neo magnet, and a 1ohm configuration. The reasons so many manufacturers keep changing their designs is because they 1) couldn't get it right the first time or 2) are more worried about cosmetic appeal.
phattacorider 1 year ago
@phattacorider
wrong lol. a 7" voice coil wouldnt be an upgrade. a CF cone isnt needed on a woofer like this and neo magnets loose power over a shorter period of time. what other companies are looking into is the pole piece. lots of upgrades can be made to that alone.
skittlesRgood182 1 year ago
The only downfall of a 7" voice coil would be the required amount of power to run it, I was exaggerating with 7"...(that's what she said). A 4" voice coil on the W7 would be a good idea, at least on the 12 and 13W7. CF wouldn't be a structural improvement but using CF would be lighter and stronger than using the plastic that's currently used. The only thing they really could do with the pole piece would be to use a more dense material and create a stronger mag field for the VC to react against.
phattacorider 1 year ago
This is the best JL i love all name brand subs but i wouldnt buy this if i had the money id go find a kicker solo x or a btl
RYDOGG2992 1 year ago
i bit orion can beat jl audio's lame ass
justinbonytube 1 year ago
not a chance bro
captaincoke3 1 year ago
GO JL AUDIO, F**K you haters who can't afford one. I went with an RE XXX because everyone says the speaker is underrated and with the same power to it(2x JL 1000/1) the W7 outperformed to RE in volume and quality
AZombiesMinge 1 year ago
in no way would a JL W7 beat a RE XXX.
and also JL doesn't suck like people say, its just not worth the price it costs.
bassl0va 1 year ago
Maybe if the RE XXX ad more power it would have been able to outperform th W7. Not everyone can wants to run 15,000 watts in their car. I think JL W7 is more than worth the cost.
AZombiesMinge 1 year ago
yeah, it's mainly power and box design so either could win. A JL W7 would easy beat a RE XXX at SQ cause a XXX is SPL and W7 is SQ. But it all depends on the box and the power. I only say that they are over priced because a retail of $439.95 for a 8" is quite alot and so are the bigger ones. Oh well, they look nice and sound nice and make bass so i don't really mind :-)
bassl0va 1 year ago
Too much ganja? XXX is SQ. W7 is like SQL.
calvinblinkee 1 year ago
@calvinblinkee Google?!?! XXX is SPL W7 is SQ
bassl0va 1 year ago
XXX has a bl curve which makes it smooth = SQ.
Well actually both sub woofers are SQL.
calvinblinkee 1 year ago
@calvinblinkee there's no such ting as SQL. You must mean SPL, or SQ. But anyways XXX=SPL W7=SQ
bassl0va 1 year ago
Weird how many experienced audio people say there is.
calvinblinkee 1 year ago
@ bassl0va -- An XXX in the right install sounds just as good, if not better than a W7 and can get MUCH louder in the process. I've owned both and u can check my vids if u want some proof. There IS such thing as SQL. In the audio world it's termed "Sound Pressure Level with Quality"...
Bsktbll895 1 year ago
@Bsktbll895 Im not saying a XXX doesnt sound good, im saying its way louder than a W7. and that a W7 isn't made for SPL, it's made for SQ. You cant get loud and quality with one woofer, you can get a bit of both, but not full on loud and quality.
bassl0va 1 year ago
@bassl0va
FOR THE GARGANTUAN PRICE OF $439.95!
unsaved013 1 year ago
@unsaved013 lol, I was waiting for someone to put that somewhere!
bassl0va 1 year ago
If both subs were setup in their PERFECT install environments, the XXX would outperform the W7 in every area hands down. When the XXX was first released in the early 2000's it was widely acclaimed the best subwoofer on the planet because of it's newly engineered XBL2 motor.
Bsktbll895 1 year ago
a single 13w7 did manage a 173.3 in extreme 3 class burp.
ProjectPechkin 1 year ago
how much power was it running? Is there build information on it? Sounds interesting
bassl0va 1 year ago
how do you get "unregistered hypercam" on a camera vid wtf?
206robert206 2 years ago
are you stupid? most people get there vids from a recording software called "Hypercam" and when you dont pay for it, it has that there
uglymanity 1 year ago
no shit Sherlock.
206robert206 1 year ago
because he screen recorded it from another website
vetteguy17 1 year ago
anyway.. its a slow motion camera... those things are like $9k
vetteguy17 1 year ago
manget girl cone and voce coil boy
x305Isaiah 2 years ago 2
thats wat it looks like when im in bed with beyonce.
skatebhs4life 2 years ago 63
@skatebhs4life
ha you only have 3 1/2 inches of excursion? that sucks
dbrider4561 1 year ago
@skatebhs4life A whole 4 inch stroke , lol
davidsstilltippin 1 year ago
@skatebhs4life only 3 1/2 inches? pathetic...
brandon9491 10 months ago
flagged.
wait, thats not right...
favorited!
gerbilPROJECT 2 years ago
i never flagged it though : )
gerbilPROJECT 2 years ago
Comment removed
gerbilPROJECT 2 years ago
KillJoy418 your that man i nearley jizzed myself
kuza261 2 years ago
song ??
TheWitcherChannel 2 years ago
That's like subwoofer porn haha. My stereo nearly jizzed itself hahaha
KillJoy418 2 years ago 75
haha
SubMasterT 2 years ago
hahaha thats great
djhlsmusic 2 years ago
who cares if the surround lasts for 5 years. in 2 years they will have a sub 10 times better.
NYClife09 2 years ago
@NYClife09 SORRY BUD BUT W7 BEEN AROUND FOR 10 YEARS AND ITS RULED THE MARKET FOR PPL WITH A BRAIN SINCE.......NOTHING COMPARES TO SQ/SPL split 50/50% mainaining both aspects
smokeymasterjedi 2 years ago 2
you must have not heard of audioulse/tc sounds then
hulbert87 2 years ago
Yes i have and if you look at there products all of the sub lines have been modified heavily over the last couple years
JL doesnt change the W7 because it set the reference levels for SQ and cost and has been at the front of Subwoofer technology for 10+ years now.............A chevy 350ci has been the HP measurement for 50years now maybey you can argue that too!!!!!!!!
smokeymasterjedi 2 years ago
Yes i have and if you look at there products all of the sub lines have been modified heavily over the last couple years
JL doesnt change the W7 because it set the reference levels for SQ and cost and has been at the front of Subwoofer technology for 10+ years now.............A chevy 350ci has been the HP measurement for 50years now maybey you can argue that too!!!!!!!!
smokeymasterjedi 2 years ago
Ok were talking about car audio not engine refrences....anyway the w7 needs a redesign anyway....it only uses one spider, which is pathetic. Not saying its a bad woofer, but there is better. JL is good at marketing and getting their product out there to be seen. Other companies like Audiopulse/Tc Sounds, RE audio, Fi/AA, Audioque, do not do that so those savings are past onto the consumer through a better product, at better priced to perfromance ratio
hulbert87 2 years ago
a jl w7 is out of the question ther fucking oveer 800$ for a single 12
Felon98 2 years ago
@hulbert87
Haha yeah TC Sounds is awesome...
the9876543 1 year ago
lmao looks like someone had to much mcdonalds
steadyk77 2 years ago
Lol, the subwoofer will eat us all!
blenderfreak112 2 years ago
Sub woofer porno.
hhall21 2 years ago 7
where u got it?
SuperSmasher97 2 years ago
excurison looks so clean :(
bensonak47 2 years ago 2
nice,whats the song?
SuperSmasher97 2 years ago
it sounds familiar to me, it was a short clip at the end of an mp3 of lollipop
ThisIs2009 2 years ago 4
its at the end of alot of songs 2 step, lollipop, and idk uh good bit tho
kingadaboom 2 years ago
Comment removed
jaes610 2 years ago
lol strap a dildo to it and fuck ur girfriend
Bamchucknorris 2 years ago 27
i bet 32hz would feel great
xregulatorx 2 years ago 5
that would cause a tsunami of orgasms
Bamchucknorris 2 years ago 7
Comment removed
butterfenco 2 years ago 2
Wonder what the extent is of TSP shift... Noobs probly wont know what that is , lol.
xazax632 2 years ago
conrats you just learned something new and now you think people will think your smart.
vinman703 2 years ago
No idiot, I didnt "learn anything new". How did you form such a retarded impression? Comprehension FTL?
Anyone busting a nut over high excursion in subwoofers should understand what is really going on or fuck off like a noobx cube bumping audiobahns.
Maybe take what you just learned in my comment and people will think you are smart XD
xazax632 2 years ago
can you tell us what it is? or r u just gona sit their and talk shit like you know something. And it do matter how much the excursion is, subs need to move air to create bass just like every other speaker, Thats y tweeters have no excursion visible by the human eye.
KbApimp007 2 years ago
Comment removed
xazax632 2 years ago
What makes you think I'm "talking shit".... Why are you on my shit?
When the Voice coil moves out of the magnetic gap, the motor looses magnetic force, alot of things happen, mostly distortion. I know why tweeters "have no excursion".... Well they do, just not very much, because higher frequencies are more audible compared to lowers frequencies..
Simple shit here, common knowlege when you compete ect ect. A quick google search will yeild plenty info....
xazax632 2 years ago
I'm to fucking tired to argue with people tonight. Any company that markets their woofers advertising how much excursion their woofers have.... Like Audiobhan, are full of shit.
At least the JLW7 uses a variable density voice coil to help maintain, linear excursion, and motor force. Audiobahn did just about nothing.... Their excursion was just like there power handling... Grossly over rated, and to bad the W7 uses a single progressive spider.. That bitch will sag. Efficiency > excursion.
xazax632 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WHOAAA Big E-Penis on this guy
Snoopynave52 2 years ago
W7 have a single progressive spider because they would cost too much with two. Imagine if just the 10W7 costed 800$...
sixtx 2 years ago
I understand what you are trying to say, but come on... How much does a progress spider cost really? You cant tell me an extra spider would jump the cost of a W7 as much as a full DD3500 recone.
The w7 does not need an extra spider anyway... maybe a better one, but it performs. The W7 has its flaws like anything else, but regardless of things, The price of the W7, and JL in general is hard to justify.
xazax632 2 years ago
Well you just got to find the right deal and try not to buy directly from JL.
sixtx 2 years ago
JL did the smartest thing with the W7. They gave it optimal performance and gave it an "image". That brought up the only problem with the W7, it costs WAY too much for that "image". I've mainly owned Rockford and MTX equipment and I will say the same things that make Alpine, Kicker, RE, Fi, and DD fans have said: the W7 just isn't worth THAT much. Of course it could be better, like twin spider suspension, outward mounting holes, or rubber surround. But that's why there are other makers.
phattacorider 2 years ago
I never liked JL audio.. Thier performance isnt bad but the main reason why i will never buy them bec theres no mounting hole to get it easier and im not going to waste my time taking the ring off and remove the foam to just get to the screws thats the most stupid plan they ever did.. and thier foam dont last at all you got to replace it down the road i pefer to buy subs thats rubber not foam. they cost too much for both image and performance period.
MR2Racer89 2 years ago 5
I've seen rubber surrounds wear away from heat and cold but not as quickly as foam. The inward mounting holes do make it an inconvenience for your average user especially since the sub is quite heavy. My thing with it is you'd have to create some weird contraption just to mount it with the magnet out. But what's smart about inward mounting holes is the end of the surround is at the end of the frame, leaving more room for better surround structure and more room for cone surface area.
phattacorider 2 years ago 2
yea I know but still dont like them lol but have u heard of armor all? that makes the rubber out last everything i use them on my subs since they are rubber and plastic its 5 years old and still looks brand new out of box when i bought it. my other friend has this jbl gt thats 9 years old and its rubber and plastic still running strong! my other frined has jl w3 he had to buy the foam 3 times he said its junk so i replaced it for him by installing rubber for it and lasted him 4 years no plm
MR2Racer89 2 years ago
ROFL, of all the things I use Armorall for, I honestly never thought to use it on my subs. Hell, I use Armorall wipes to clean my hands, shoes, computer, RC cars, and sometimes to clean and shine my interior, but for the subs that actually sounds quite neat!
phattacorider 2 years ago
LOL it works great! give it a try u will be impressd of how new it makes the sub looks I've used it all my life just dont use it on subs that's foam or paper it will weaken it lol
MR2Racer89 2 years ago
Check out the JL Audio Fathom home subwoofer. It uses a reconditioned W7 driver. When they first hit the market, audio enthusiasts were skeptical because JL Audio did car audio, which is notorious for sounding like crap. But, they're minds quickly changed when they heard them, and now the Fathom is regarded as one of the best subs out there, and competes with other home subs costing much, much more; and at $3700 for the 13 in. model, it's a freaking bargain for how well it performs.
falkenlaser 2 years ago
Imagine what that would look like with no surround,lol
EdmDude 3 years ago 6
Comment removed
toojey 3 years ago
wow, tat makes me horny.. LOL
Rayvandy 3 years ago 9
Holy crap nuts! That looks like it could give blow jobs.. Damn... Serious woofer porn.
thetechnician22 3 years ago 5
lol wtf
252Blade252 3 years ago 3
your an idiot.
greame5 2 years ago
What is song?
19robercik64 3 years ago
I dont know the name on my music list just says track 1
funnyface680 3 years ago
can you send me this track?
19robert64 at gmail . com
Please :)
19robercik64 3 years ago
was that real or o_O?
wickedboy50 3 years ago
Yes it is real lol
funnyface680 3 years ago
DAMMMMN
slrmclarenf1 3 years ago
fuck this shit is sick!!!!!
ssanchez760 3 years ago 3