Added: 3 years ago
From: redvand
Views: 158,220
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (568)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • another waste of money by K street lobbyists for some bankrupt shipyard in some bankrupt state.

  • Both the LCS1(Freedom) and LCS2 (Independence) Classes are a basic boondoggle. A report by the Pentagon's director of Operational Test and Evaluation found that neither design was expected to "be survivable in a hostile combat environment" and that neither ship could withstand the Navy's full ship shock trials. And of course, the MASSIVE cost overruns...Qwerty99 had it absolutely right! Every blackshoe in the Navy hates these... and for good reason.

  • Absolutely freakin hillarious....thx redvand!

  • Dumb Dumb Dumb. Divided you will fall.

  • We need this to stop underwear bombers?

  • Speaking as a retired USN sailor: No he wouldn't; because the LCS is an almost useless, over priced gold plater that needs DDGs to defend it from anything bigger than a go-fast. It's hated by almost everyone in the Navy who doesn't work in the Pentagon.

    Thanks Light Weight Mafia! (Rumsfield's Defense Department)

  • @Qw3rty99 its meant for low intense warfare ,navy hated carriers as well then pearl harbour changed that.

  • @MrFattyfatfatboy Being built to civilian construction standards means they aren't built for ANY kind of warfare. The hull in both types can be penetrated by small arms fire, unlike normal combatants which are resistant to anything .50cal or below.

  • Comment removed

  • Bush was a failure and Obama is a disappointment...Its hard to pay too much to people who cant at least acknowledge that its a failing system doesnt matter whos at the top..I love the country but our leaders arent doing it justice.

  • Iraq is going to fall apart like Yugoslaviia did. Too many factions hating each other. When America gives up control..Iran will help one faction. There will be civil war

    and a renewed holocaust.

  • Short answer: Yes. Obama has killed more terrorists than Bush ever did, and handled Libya rather expertly without costing a single American life in the process. Credit where it's due. You conservatives have lost your national defense cred, and any semblance of foreign policy aptitude. You just fill in your lack of leadership with racist and fanatical religious banter. No better than the Taliban. And for the record I'm not a Democrat ether.

  • @Lukos0036

    That's funny - the same military and Bush foreign policy aptitude has been used all along. Besides the Bow and Apology Tour. Obama changed nothing. Only a democrat makes comments like you. You can't even be truthful in your anti-right rant. NATO handled Libya - the US does not control NATO last we knew. Come to think of it, France actually played a big part. Poor Obama - he only wishes he was the master of agenda like Bush was. Where's the college records Barry? Hiding somewhere?

  • @PeganCove Your precious right wanted to send a full deployment to Libya. Obama abstained and used drones. The war in Iraq cost a trillion dollars, Libya cost a billion, and they plan to pay that back. How? Oil I imagine. It shouldn't me America's job alone to hold the gun and shoot people. Why shouldn't Europ pull it's weight? Ditch the imperialist elitist bs. Bush made us more enemies and spent all our cash. Obama killed them. Economy will take years longer yet.

  • @Lukos0036

    The first to use drones the most was Bush. There have been 4 upgrades to the drones since then and many newer models - hmmm, I wonder how they are much more accurate as time goes along. The right didn't want to touch Libya at all fool. That's why they barked at Obama during the debt crisis. Obama is no field general pal nor is any other president. They have a military panel that advises them what is happening. They give yes or no answers. Bush said F the middle east and was right.

  • @Lukos0036 Are you fucking retarded? The Britts had more to do with ops in Lybia than the US . They sent a bloody squadron of Typhoons ffs, and you send some drones. So stop being so fucking arrogant and giving the US a bad name, because I know not all Americans are like you. And stop wanking on about how Europe should "pull its weight" because it fucking well does, it just doesn't support wars for oil. Get over yourself. I agree that Obama is a BAWSE though.

  • @lardman2228 Actually if you bothered reading I was addressing Americas policy in Libya, not the EUs. And if you want to get technical, and I know you do you elitist jackass, France had the biggest footprint in the region. As for wars for oil, we get most of ours from Canada and Venezuela. Not the middle east. It's YOUR gas we are fighting for. You're as ignorant as you are rude. Try working on your reading comprehension. Jackass.

  • @Lukos0036 Hold on just a minute, you were't addressing the EUs policy in Lybia? Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure you said " Why shouldn't Europ pull it's weight?" which it is obviously doing. France had the biggest footprint in what region, what are you on about? Is that even relevant? How do you know where your oil comes from? I'd highly doubt that none of it comes from the middle east. And I don't know what you mean by MY gas, you don't even know where I'm from.

  • @Lukos0036 Hold off on the judging, yeah?

  • It's amazing how ignorant people remain even with the internet at their fingertips. This dumbass only knows what people tell him to think. Thinking for himself is just not part of his make-up.

  • The ask whether Obama would build this is the most ignorant and disgusting question you could ask. I am a life long Democrat and I would remind you that after Bush, and his criminal gang chicken hawk scum spent us into oblivion by starting two wars one ilegal and unecessary, and the other botched until Obama came along. Pig scum republicans mismanaged our military nearly destroying it in the process. Obama provided the leadership that killed Benladin and other top scum Jihadis. Your an ass!

  • It;s not up to the president to build this ship as it has already been built. Only the US Congress can authorize the military budget or trim it, and they have already given the Navy the go ahead on the littoral fleet. Pres. Obama has correctly recognized that the threat from Islamic terrorists won't come from the sea as they have no navy. If you are afraid of terrorism then the terrorists have already beaten you and no ship will protect you from another 9/11 attack.

  • Obama has hence killed more high ranking terrorists than Bush ever did. Props where due bro.

  • o yeah and look up the uss new york

  • I dont think Obama builds ships :L And your military cannot modernize, you are too much debt due to the stupid ideology of Capitalism. USA will become a new Province of China in 2 years.

  • @owen82100 modernize? ur a moron look up the LCS freedom, we've been modernized! the rest of the world is still playing catch up. 10 aircraft carriers, the best tank in the world, 178 f-22 raptors, apache gunships, f-35's coming to service this year and plans to make a 6th generation fighter and bomber. province of china? I'll laugh when we don't pay them notthing, europe is in worst shape than america, Portugal, Greece, Spain, Italy, Ireland and france is next..say hello to ur german overlord

  • How is it that you daft republican supporters make everything into an anti Obama statement. Who got bin laden? Bush? No not that fuckwit.  Who got Al Awaki? Get a grip and reaise that Obama is the best that USA has right now. If the alternative is Romney or Perry, the world will write off the US as a bunch of right wing nut jobs. Your idealogically driven prejudices blind you to the realities. By the way, I class myself as conservative. What you guys are is simply nuts.

  • @0sacrosanct

    The US Military and CIA got bin Laden. You think Obama got him? With what - his Harvard pen?

    "I class myself as conservative." Who is this - Hillary? Are you going to run your campaign on "Blame Obama"?

  • @PeganCove yes they found him . and he gave the kill order . with out that they would not have gone in

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    You mean like Clinton? He said not to when operatives had him in the cross-hairs. So what Barry gave the order. His wife could have too. He didn't hunt or kill him - our military did. So, he didn't 'get' him. He never fired a weapon in his life!

  • @PeganCove . the order still cam from obama like it or not with out permtion form him . the seal team would not have been let off there leash

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Give the credit where it is due - those who put their lives on the line, not the person who said GO! Even Carter would have given the order. Well, maybe.

  • @PeganCove bottom line. yes they seal team did there job good . but bottom line with out the kill order form prez. it would have never happen bottom line. just like in ww2 they held all of thos you gave the orders to kill pow accttabel. same thing here

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Which POW's are you talking about? The military is going to do their job no matter who is in charge. The credit goes to those who did the heavy lifting, not the person firing the starting gun. Do you think he wouldn't give the order? Like I said, even Carter would have and he was the biggest pacifist to ever be in the White House. The SEALS are responsible for taking bin Laden out, not the president. While they were putting it all on the line, the president watched safely on TV

  • @PeganCove no poop he wached it safely on tv. ya think any prez would be aloued to say hay i want to go on this mission and shoot him my self . no secret service would not let him. like it on not history will recored it that he got him bottom line

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Um, no partner. Those who fired the shots that killed bin Laden GOT him, bottom line, like it or not. Would you give a football team president the credit for his quarterback throwing the game winning touchdown? Nope. The president gave the ORDER. He'll be remembered for giving the order. He did not GET bin Laden. He was ADVISED by our military, who helped track him down also. So, our military found him AND killed him, not Obama. Got it Bro? By the way, your spelling is horrible.

  • @PeganCove lmao i dont care what you say all i know is history will recored that he got him bottom line. im not your bro or your partner . just a person who stats facts aso to what history will recorde botom line

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    I don't care what you say either. History will show he was in charge when Navy Seal Team Six got bin Laden. The only people who GOT him actually put their hands on his dead body and then dumped him in the ocean. Kind of hard for Barry to do that when he was in Washington DC. Some day, you will grasp that fact...hopefully. Bottom line - Obama gave the OK. Our military got him. Operation Neptune Spear - the only mention of Obama is giving approval. Have a nice day.

  • @PeganCove lmao ok lets see what the would see on the sub ject . ah lets google who got osama. well look at this

    'Obama got Osama' won't win in 2012 - CNN----Field Notes - Across New York City, joy that 'Obama got Osama'----Capitol Idea: Obama Got Osama –--Information Processing: Obama got Osama---Obama Got Osama Gifts - Zazzle. there ya go bottom line all over the net history will record obama got osama. there my fact case cloased

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    How about this headline "DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN". You can Google all you want. The internet is filled with goofy opinion. Don't base yours on it. Base it on backable fact. Google Operation Neptune Spear (the actual act) and SEAL Team Six gets the accolades. Case closed. Yes You Can!

  • @PeganCove yes you can but . rember what the fact is who ever gave the go order is responsable. in any chain of command there for he got him . bottom line 

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Not true. Those who do the actual actions are. FACT. When a scientist working for Merck creates a ground breaking new drug, the CEO doesn't get the credit, the scientist does. Same thing with the SEALS getting bin Laden and Obama being cozy in the White House. Bottom line.

  • @PeganCove your talking drug companys. im talking millatery chain of command. wich the buck stops at the prezadent. just like bush is blamed for the iraq war . the troops did the fighting. not bush so do we blame the troops for attking a contry that had no wmd left. no we blame bush. the person who gave the order is the one how eather gets the blame or the credit. bottom line

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Dumb Arse, Congress approves war, not Bush. If Congress doesn't approve the war, there is no war. Bush gave the order, but Congress can say no way. Both Congress and Bush get the blame for Iraq. By the way, nice of Obama to take credit for the Iraq troop withdrawal which was right on schedule...with Bush's time line. Seems to me Obama said he was pulling ALL troops from Iraq and Afghanistan within a year of getting elected...boy, did he do a 180. He'll say anything for votes.

  • @PeganCove ah but bush wint in befor congress approved

  • @TFOKillSwitch uh no he didn't..check your history

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Wrong again. Did you go to school stupid and come out exactly the same?He wint in? What kind of English are you trying to write?

  • @PeganCove lol so now you see you were wrong and now you resault to insaults good for you. you so moving up in the world. and yes bush wint in be for it was aproved not once but twice

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    TFO, you haven't been right since I replied. The person that said check your history was replying to YOU. The Iraq assault only happened once under GW Bush in 2003, so how did he go in twice?His father, with Congressional approval also, authorized Desert Storm in 1991. But, only once. With comments of yours like "resault to insaults", we can only imagine you have an IQ under 70 or brain damage from too much kind bud! Give it up donkey lover - you have DERAILED! Bottom Line!

  • @PeganCove i have been to. on the main topic Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan on May 2, 2011, shortly after 1 a.m. local time . The operation, code-named Operation Neptune Spear, was ordered by United States President Barack Obama and carried out in a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) .

    yup he ordered it he got him case cloased y acan keep on crying like a kid all ya want facts facts

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    "carried out in a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)" what? SEAL Team Six got him. FACT. Case closed. Barry was warm and cozy in Washington DC. He didn't even get a paper cut, Bottom Line. Obama also ordered the stimulus which put the country in debt for an additional $800 billion and wants to add over $400 billion more now! Great Work Moonbats! Keep digging, our military FOUND and GOT bin Laden! May we suggest you learn how to write proper English before replying again.

  • @PeganCove lmao the coruntry was allredy going in to the hole during the elections. bush allredy spent the surpluse that clitton got.. so whats your idea or are you a sheep who is like every one else and has no ideas and just go along with the RP bull crap .iv been to war i got the meddels to prove it what have you dune . probly nuthing in this life . just a nother rp hater

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    The surplus? You mean the surplus the republican congress gave to Clinton? Clinton didn't create a surplus in a back room. Congress handed it to him. Clinton also handed Bush an economy on the downfall after the dot com boom from the early 90's. Add Fannie/Freddie nd the screw up of BOTH PARTIES and you have today's current situation. I was in Iraq in 1990/1991. 3rd Battalion 2nd Marines. Where you a water boy or something? You're just another lib tard pom pom boy for NObama!

  • @PeganCove the 1st tank batllion we sparheaded the assalt of task force papa bear

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Which Spearhead? There were 3 in total. Were you in the Marines?

  • @PeganCove 1st marine expediionry force we reached the air port and held it

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    You're talking 2003. Why don't you say it? There were 2 invasions of Iraq - even you know that.

  • @PeganCove some deamons are well left in boxes were they belong

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Iran is the enemy. And Jordan and Syria and to some extent Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. But, Iran is the central location of the real vermin. They are supplying the forces we fight in Afghanistan now similar to what we did when those forces fought the Soviets. We can't afford a battle on Iran and they know it. Patience. Plus, we need a combined effort. Every country pays instead of just us.

  • @PeganCove im going to go drink some wisky now . good debating with ya Semper Fi

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Semper Fi. Booze it up!

  • @PeganCove Pakistan is doing the real supplying actually. Haqqani network is sending them weapons and supplies, and fighters. Pakistan doesn't want a strong Afghanistan on one border with a rising India on the other. There is a tribal facet to this as well.

  • @Lukos0036

    You're right. They both are in fact. Take a guess what will happen in Iraq within a year of us withdrawing. To those thanking Obama for 'ending the war', it has been over for years in Iraq. He again is following the Bush time line for troop withdrawal without mentioning his name. We'll know just how smart he is by this time next year...right before election time. Didn't know Harvard was a military school - they teach Westpoint and Naval Academy curriculum there? Kagan hated US Army.

  • @PeganCove Of course when Obama does something right it's Bush that did it first, but when something Bush actually did goes wrong it's all Obama's fault. Credit where it's due man. Bush has been gone for 3 years now. He was never a competent leader. And holding him up like your hero Regan doesn't make a messy administration any better. Stop cheering for a banner or "team" and start voting for you, and your families welfare. Republicans and Democrats are leveraging us against one another. Think!

  • @Lukos0036

    Tell us, what did Obama 'do right'? First the wars were bad with Bush. Now, they're good because Obama put his hands on them. Like I said, it's the same military and policy used for a decade. You are saying he's doing good job with Iraq, but when Iran sends in extremists by the thousands, you'll see that it was premature. Bush's plan to pull all troops by the end of 2011 was based on the region's stability. A competent leader doesn't go on Bow and Apology tours.

  • @PeganCove Bow and Apology sounds like a Rush Limbaugh sound bite. Stop getting your information from multi billionares that act like they give a shit about you when they don't.

  • @Lukos0036

    Your commentary sounds word for word like Chris Matthews or Rachel MadCow. Do a little bit more research to get the whole picture before spitting out nonsense. Libya has already said they are installing a Sharia based gov't. Great Work Obama!

  • @Lukos0036

    Also, if I were you, I wouldn't take a flight that brought you anywhere near Libya for quite some time. That huge cache of anti-aircraft weapons has still not been located. Those F's are crazy enough to shoot at anything flying by and say it was Allah's will.

  • @Lukos0036

    Bush was certainly no prize and Obama ain't a whole lot of an improvement. Obama wishes he had half the balls Reagan did. You think the Soviets would have bowed to a democrat like Carter, Clinton or Obama during the Cold War? We are F'd no matter which party represents us. But, Obama was supposed to be the guy to unite us, not divide us. He's done nothing to stop it except keep tossing blame. Like you said, he's been in charge for 3 years. I love the 'Bush's 8 years' BS - hilarious.

  • @PeganCove Under Regan we got trickle down economics, savings & loan debacles, and a huge deficit from run away military spending. Under Bush Sr, er got recession. Clinton's administration saw a economic boom and eradication of debt. Bush Jr. pissed that all away and then some. Now we have Obama and we are struggling but recovering slowly. Obama has made mistakes. His national security policy isn't one of them which is the premise of this video. The soviets did themselves in, ran out of money.

  • @Lukos0036

    Reagan pulled us out of a recession due to Carter's complete F up of a term and his policies made our economy strong once again. Bush Sr got us into a recession, but Clinton rode the wave of the computer boom due to timing. He had nothing to do with the dot com boom, the 90's was the biggest peg in corporate history. Republican congress handed Clinton the surplus. Clinton handed Bush Jr. the dot com bust. Both parties are to blame for the toxic mortgage blowout that sunk us.

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    The Army's 3rd Armored Division led the main spearhead north in Iraq. Not 1st battalion. Sorry baby bear.

  • What happened after WW2? We rebuilt France and helped England too. You expect for us to just walk away? We did that to Afghanistan after they fought the Soviets. Assisted them at first and left them nothing but their shattered homeland. That's who were are up against now. Those same people were we helped 2-3 decades ago. Only, they are against us presently. Do you not understand that we can't just walk away afterward? Does that make sense to you now? Figured a liberal would pick it up first.

  • @PeganCove its hard to rebuild when you cant evean trust a kid you helping out of a dich form blowing your buddys hed off. they dont want us there let them rot in hell

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    Iraq is safer now than when Saddam controlled it. He killed more of his own people every year than we did in the invasion. He killed over 10,000 Kurds in a single Sarin gas attack (WMD). There is always going to be suicide bombers as there are extremist Muslims all over the middle east including Israel. You might be thinking of Vietnam with that comparison.

  • @PeganCove no we were helping a kid .he hade to be no more then 8 . he was laying down crying we thought he was hurt so we rushed over there to help him . sam wint down there to pick him up and. kid sid some thing in his arabic. and then boom sam gon kid gone . im laying on my back with my ears ringing. then wating to kill every thing in sight

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    During the invasion and shortly after - sure. Now, the majority of Iraq supports the forces still there. They know if we leve completely, they are toast by the extremists. I have 2 cousins still there. Just have to keep on guard like anywhere else they say. Safe is a loose term that needs lost of tightening with checks and re-checks. The sooner we wipe out Iran, the sooner over 90% of terrorists go bye bye.

  • @PeganCove henc my gamer name . not the band kill switch. but the switch that is fliped in you head. and is hard to trun off

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    A soldier's job is to wear the US uniform and kill the enemy. Period.

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

    - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

    - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

  • @PeganCove as a repply to this yes he was . had the ones we gave him. bush just wanted to impres his daddy and finshe what his father couldent. and fucked up the whole middel east

  • @TFOKillSwitch

    He had the ones we gave him what? What the hell are you talking about? Bush went after Saddam after he grew out of being our puppet. The US gave him all kinds of support when Iraq was at war with Iran since Iran was hated (and still is). The lie was WMD and the libs all cried like babies. The middle east has been F'ed up for years way before we went over there partner. Bush's father could have finished it back in the 90's but public pressure forced us to stop. Big Mistake.

  • We were a day from Baghdad with the biggest assembled military force since WW2. Nobody was stopping that army except politicians and they did. If they allowed the job to be finished, our forces would have been home long ago. You need to do a little more research before running your mouth off via stupid replies Man!

  • @PeganCove bush sinnore . knew what would happen . if you poped him out of there. years and years of rebuilding there.

  • Obama wouldn't build a rowboat if it was going to belong to the US military....

  • @Draxillior Really? What proof can you offer to back up that stupid statement? Go on, give me just one reason!

  • obama would build anything he's told to build, invest in anything that is profitable for the right people. What more is there to being president?

  • obama works for bush crime family

  • obama dont build boats he builds headaches

  • Oh agreed.. Russia and China are by no means stupid.. During the cold war there was no greater adversary than Russia. Twice they averted a nuclear war.. Look up Vasili Arkhipov and Stanislav Petrov.. You think of the Soviet Union and the United States as being big and bad superpowers.. But we were genuinely Scared of each other.. And thats how it will be any time in the future with any country.. If you have nukes.. You're not gonna want to use them... Like holding a grenade in closed room..

  • And yes Obama would build a ship like the USS Freedom litoral combat ship. If he is willing to support spending 9 billion dollars on building three of the most advanced combat ships in the world ( the ddg 21 zumwalt class destroyers) then why not.

  • yessssss! cut the defense budget now . China, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan and Russia are not planning or ever will be planning to invade the United States of America. Its time for the American Empire to come to an end and start addressing more dire needs at home, that are more of a threath to American national security than worrying about a few countries that are not threaths at all.

  • yessssss! cut the defense budget now . China, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan and Russia are not planning or ever will be planning to invade the United States of America. Its time for the American Empire to come to an end and start addressing more dire needs at home, that are more of a threath to American national security than worrying about a few countries that are not threaths at all.

  • i would have laughed if the boat flipped...

  • wow an lcs ship...littoral meaning basically our own waters.... meaning we probably spent a few billion to build something our existing navy could aready do. and exactly what is this ship going to fight? The Al-Qaeda navy... or air force? Like the non-existent WMD's in Iraq I am awaiting evidence that such a force even exists. I am sure the defense department and weapons industry can come up with some "Facts" to that effect...4 their budget.

  • @Mattothee: OK you really need a "leg-up" class in mathematics + epidemiology, this forum limits the comment length, so any rebuttal I give on are differences due to calculation method / or stat source is trivial. Long story short; you are comparing apples and fig trees. Let's just agree I'm pro western imperialism, and you are against. 14/88 --Katie

  • Obama is building better.... LCS2 :)

  • @Derealmist You mean General Dynamics and Austal are building better. Obama really had nothing to do with lcs 1 or 2

  • Sure the right wing conservative Obama would build this ship, unlike Bush he got Bin Laden and Quadafi, didn't he.

  • @kdc43 I think you got the two mixed up... Obama is super liberal and Bush is a conservative

  • @Trackernate Bush is neo con conservitive you mean? Bush is a corporate croney and a retard at that.

  • @Trackernate Both are. Obama is more conservative than Reagan, Reagan would be forced out of the GOP for being a too moderate GOP.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Well even though Obama is not a fan of the Bush Style type army, he LOVES using CIA and drones, and similar platforms. So i am not sure whether he will want to build this. It may fit in his niche category due to its stealth, but it's kind of large and bulky and is not the stealth blackhawks that he'll automatically fund.

  • I thought that shit was going to tip over and capsize there for a second

  • Obama is BS

  • @Mattothee : .."your government killed 1 000 000 innocent Iraqi civilians." Really? You sound worse than a WW2 jew trying to grub reparation money. Check your stats idiot. Iragi pop. has grown @ 2.5% since 2000 through present,

    google.ca/publicdata/overview?­ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&ctype=l&stra­il=false&nselm=h&hl=en&dl=en , just another America hating faggot, that spouts libtard/MTV propaganda. Go back to high school stats class nigger. 14/88 --Katie

  • @katiesaucedon Iraq population only grew 2.5% in 10 years?? America population grew by over 10% in that period. Average growth each year for 3rd world is 2-3% I think. Hmm, maybe 1 million Iraqi deaths is conservative. No doubt, there is blood on America's hands! In the 1980's alone, it is estimated US caused 6 million deaths. During the Philippine-American War 1899-1902 it is estimated US caused the deaths of up to 1 million civilians. So Iraq is nothing new at all.

  • The situation in the Gulf is complex, but the early 90s tanker war and the sorties of the Iranian navy revealed the threat to US carriers from a growing multiplicity of threats- high speed missile armed frigates., Mach 6 land based ex Ukranian sunburst anti ship missiles, small 200 ton submarines revealed to be lethal by the North Koreans, Yugoslavs, Columbian drug runners and Kilo missile subs. Naval commanders face a multiplicity of potentially fast closing threats in multi level chess.

  • Since Obama has been president for several years now, then he IS building a ship like that. In fact, he's building that ship. So question answered.

  • @Parrotguy1999 Thia video was posted in 2008. Check dates before you look silly

  • @CocacolaCowboy1919 So what? They were still being put into service when he was elected, and the class is still being built now. So it's the ignorant Obama bashers that look silly.

  • @CocacolaCowboy1919 I don't think you understand what was being said. He was not reffering to physically currently manufacturing. Of course Obama is not going to go to the shipyards and say "Stop Building these". He means if Obama was president back when the Navy was planning this he wondered if O would have approved of the design and finances etc or would he want budget cuts to the military which is what is different between liberals and conservatives. Reagan had large defense budget. .

  • That's so great! But...what the hell is it supposed to be?? It doesnt look like it has a defense system of any kind

  • @B1gO Armament: 1x BAE Systems Mk 110 57 mm gun, 400 rounds in turret and two ready service magazineswith 240 rounds each.[8] 4x .50-cal machine guns 2x Mk44 Bushmaster II 30mm guns 21x RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile Surface-to-Air Missiles 45 NLOS missiles (As part of ASuW mission module)[9][10] Aircraft carried: 2x MH-60R/S Seahawk

    MQ-8 Fire Scout

  • @B1gO The design incorporates a large reconfigurable seaframe to allow rapidly interchangeable mission modules, a flight deck with integrated helicopter launch, recovery and handling system and the capability to launch and recover boats (manned and unmanned) from both the stern and side.combatant for missions such as anti-mine warfare, anti-submarine warfare, surface warfare and humanitarian relief.with a 40man crew.a other ships of her size takes over a 100man crew . crewing cost down

  • idk

    

  • Wait, so is the original posters point that LCS 1 Freedom is more patriotic than LCS 2 Independence? Or, is he claiming that President Obama is responsible for every atrocity against humanity in the history of man: Dark Ages, disco, Macarena and Justin Bieber, to name a few? Anyways, the President didn't create the problems we're experiencing, and unfortunately, didn't do much to solve them, either. Oh well.

  • Well, it was Obama, as a democratic president, that caught Bin Laden.. It's Obama that is busy ending the 2 wars (Iraq and Afghanistan) that Republican George W. Bush started and that cost(ed) billions of dollars. Obama is the man that tries to unite political parties inside the USA (Republicans and Dem's) to work out solutions for the USA a a whole. He also is very much respected for his intelligence in the world outside the USA. Mr. Obama for president in 2012 again!

  • Obama, the puppet of the banking elitists ought to be AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE ENEMY!! Their agenda is to destroy our econimic system to bring in a new world order and you can see it happening!! The Bush family, Clinton, Henry Kissinger too are all apart of the Bilderberg and Illuminate. They want to force a New World Order and a New World Government. America will lose her sovereignty if we continue to vote for ungodly people!!

    WAKE UP AMERICA AND PRAY AGAINST THESE PEOPLE!!!

  • The USA spends more on defence than China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, Canada, Japan, South Korea, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Israel, South Africa, Mexico, Spain...... COMBINED!!

    In fact, taken as a percentage, with the whole world @ 100%, the USA spends 52% of of the ENTIRE worlds defence budget!

    Who are you afraid of?! Nobody!

  • @danking1966 tHE BANK MANAGER : )

  • @danking1966 The Bank Manager : )

  • We need a powerful military, and our big guns, to keep the evil powers of the world at bay. (Iran, N.Korea Ect).

    Like they always say;

    You can get farther with a kind word and a gun, then with just a kind word.

  • Obama all the way!

  • Obama might not be that great. But he isn't a dumbfuck like republican presidents are. Ships like these represent a sledgehammer in a day when a ball peen and claw hammer and expert craftsman are needed. We are just like the Roman and British Empires, and are falling because of the exact same retarded thinking. We beat the British because we were smarter, now we are dumb and will be defeated by smarter people. Nice little bathtub toy that boat is. It wont save us though. Only our wits will.

  • @heartfire451 Obama is not a dumbfuck, as you put it - but a cunning anti-American bent on destroying this country by weakening the military, by overwhelming the economy with his capntrade and obamacare, so to create a Marxist-socialist shithole the rest of the world can spit on. Can't wait till 2012 - let's hope America isn't as gullible as it turned out to be in 2008!!!

  • @igordy  LOL

  • Oh wow, I didn't know that's how they move new ship onto the water. Just throw them over!

  • TERRORISM WAS CREATED IN AMERICA UNDER BUSH.. EVEN BIN LADEN DID NOT KNOW WHAT AL QUAIDA WAS.USA OF MAKING EVERYONE ALWAYS SCARED PF THE BOOGYMAN THATS NEVER THERE WASTING OUR COUNTRIES MONEY..

  • Well he might later on but he's probably a bit busy now being President.

  • He talked to BinLadin....... with a BULLET !

  • Oh look. Another fat target for diesel-electric subs and anti-shipping missiles. Ships of this class have done exactly zilch to protect the 50 U.S. states since the end of WWII.

    What they have done is ensured that EXPORTED AMERICAN JOBS can continue to profit while american citizens rot.

    We're #1.......in first world nations with homeless people. Whoot.

  • @Pangolinx1 i would like to coreect you on one point. this ship was built in marinette wisconsin. her sister ship was built in AB. there are going to be 10 more built in WI. and 10 more in AB

  • @TFOKillSwitch The U.S. Navy seems helpless to stop piracy off the coast of Somalia. What exactly is it good for?

    It protects us from imaginary enemies that haven't attacked U.S. shores since 1945. Note the 9-11 terrorist attacks were allegedly prosecuted by people who walked into the U.S. with valid passports. There is nothing the U.S. Navy coud have done to prevent that occurrence.

    War is a racket.

  • @Pangolinx1 yes you are wright . but i was ancering you on this point

    What they have done is ensured that EXPORTED AMERICAN JOBS can continue to profit while american citizens rot.

    and on this point you are wrong. all 20 ships are bing built here in fact they added a nother 1000 jobs to marinette marin just to fill the order

  • Read some history about The Roman Empire and the British Empire and see what maintaining a large standing army across wast areas ends up doing to the security of these empires!!! And when you done that read some about economy about balancing budget and what mounting debts do to the security of a country. When you done that, provided you can read of course, you would realise that strength lies in economic power, not in military. If you don't get that I recommend you start learning Chinese!!!

  • Freedom? in the USA today? Travel, go see the rest of the world and find out what I'm talking about. good luck and best wishes from the land of the free.........Canada

  • beautiful ship beautiful name!

  • @ Redvand You have as much warfare experience as dumb ass Sarah Palin. Winning the war is about changing influence not high tech. Also, if you knew ships you would know there are better ships out there. Get some warfare experience before you talk out your butt!!!! If everyone would stop playing politics and be serious about ending this goat rope we would have finished this war by the time this numbskull posted this statement.

    Remember WWII draft, war tax, war bonds, rationing, sacrifice....

  • I can't think of too much need for a ship of this capability, and the program has gone grossly overbudget and behind schedule. The program could have funded a few school programs, and maybe then we could have better educated a new generation of diplomats and sociologists and officers. The diplomats to work with potential adversaries, sociologists to understand them, and officers in case the former are beyond helping us. Tools HELP win a war, but are useless without PEOPLE.

  • If we were to maintain only a modest army and air force and keep a well equipped standing navy, America would be fine. America cannot afford to protect the world, even thought that is a noble cause. If anyone were to attack we could easily hold off any attack until we brought up a massive military counter attack. Look at WW2 where we were relatively unprepared and then had more military power than we had any conceivable need for.

  • protecting america pfff it's more like crusading n playing god , but islam is going to conquer America even if u build more carriers n destroyers , it's an idea and u can't stop it , as for war , america's destruction will be by a self nuking or a natural deasaster

  • To answer the title of this vid. Nope!!! But he will de-fund the program in a NY minute and give the money to people that have 15 kids and will not work or AID to Muslim countries.

  • I think that the Saudis and the Chinese actually own this vessel.

  • but she stayed strong and got back up. Old freedom

  • What do you mean by, "would Obama build a ship like this?"? Are you asking if he would go to the shipyard himself and build it with his bear hands? Go Navy!

  • oh yeah because there is such a need for more ships in the fleet because of the growing naval powers of ....... somolia?

  • @kalif151byccrew . no dumb ass its becaus we have anging fleet. that needs to be replaced .the lcs can do the work of 3 ships and only have a 40 man crew verses haveing to have a crew of 100 or so with the older ships. so you save mony in crewing cost over the long run.the ships are made to costal waters .

  • @asseder1 i'm a dumbass? you're arguing with someone on the internet hahahaha navy is for fags anyways hahahahahaha loser get a life hahahahahahaha

  • @kalif151byccrew lmao im not arguing im stating a point . the fleet is old and needs replacing . ships date back to the 60. and with a responce like that comming form you insted of ingaging in facts you resault to insulats . what a true dumb ass you are

  • @asseder1 your point is gay and I'm the wrong person to try and prove it to. call your senator. you're still a loser and so what if the ships are from the 60's, that means they still work. if you and your friends want to fund more newer ships by all means. not on my tax dollar.

  • @kalif151byccrew lmao your taxe doller . you probly still live with your parents. and dont work.so there for you dont pay taxes. so yes your right not on your tax dollers caues you dont pay any

  • @asseder1 yes because you gathered all this info via youtube, you are so smart there's no wonder why these ships aren't built already. at least i have parents you test tube baby

  • @kalif151byccrew. no i know this becuase i live next to one of the workers form marinette marine . 1 once again kid learn something first be for speaking. freedom is allready.in CA the second freedom class ship forth worth was just put in to the water . how i know i wached her go in. they are being built in my home town.2 the navel contracts for the next 9 ships was aproved last summer. thats y they are not built yet. so kid . go back to school you do need it

  • @asseder1 you have one subscriber, probably yourself no videos posted so who's the broke one now? get a camera post a vid and be somebody

  • @kalif151byccrew lol get out of your parents house . grow up  be somebody

  • @asseder1 stop being broke and buy a camera and post a video you lurking troll internet is great for losers like you. you are a loser internet loser not one video posted and one subscriber kill yourself you lame ass loser please do us all a favor and hang yourself bitch ass loser hahaha no camera no video why are you on youtube? to troll hahaha like a fucking loser. where do you live so I can help you kill yourself loser. check my vids idiot I got the guns to do it, I dont just post vids

  • @kalif151byccrew lmao marinette 1447 shrmen st bring it

  • @kalif151byccrew o and now you are reported lol injoy the banding headed your way for threting . wich viloats youtubs end agremnt injoy

  • @asseder1 Guess what, dumbfuck. He's still here. Two weeks and your report ain't done shit, now get yourself enrolled in a fucking English class.

  • @kalif151byccrew o and so what you got guns big deale im scared now lmao

  • @asseder1 don't be scared, just don't be a loser either

  • Yeah he porbably would its not like were in a depression and in massive amounts of debt......

  • @VIKINGSGUY33 lol RP wast of space

  • Malamao Tim your are a complete fool....To build a weapon system such as this is a several year project which has not one thing to do with Obama. Before you attack something which you understand nothing about get your facts straight. Its idiots such as you who voted this lib in who now is wrecking our social structure and economic future. Gas up 180%, unemployment staying at they say 8%, but truely the actual numbers are double...Grow a brain man.....