Added: 5 years ago
From: darthbobby007
Views: 91,169
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (446)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I cannot pronounce the host's name

  • A Moscow region court has declared books and brochures by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard as extremist, the Prosecutor General’s Office said in a statement Thursday.

    The Shchyolkovo town court, at the request of local prosecutors, ruled that Hubbard’s book “What Is Scientology?” and “several other” brochures “call for extremist activities” and include “humiliating characteristics” of people depending on their social status, the statement said.

  • This is fake 

  • 104 people are scientologist, and they have Negative"thetans" Or watever the fuck its called.

  • this is a joke surely

  • i hate it when religious people say WE believe this or WE believe that, whats wrong with individuals thinking for them selves.

  • Thanks for the lulz !

    And for exposing a bit of the idiocy of scientology ofc.

  • It's funny that most Christians find this ridiculous while their own religion is perhaps even more retarded.

    Atheism is the only truth.

  • LAME!

  • Hey, I also do that kinda thing.

    Sitting in a room, alone, and cleansing my inner self, sort off.

    Lol, luv these guys.

  • You guys are great actors, you should win an award :) You depict scientology perfectly.

  • gud vid...

  • lulz! very scientology to me!xD love this vid!

  • Kim Bellotte is a very sexy $cientologist.

    Kim Bellotte is the executive director of this dangerous cult in DC.

    Tax this terrible cult.

  • ok this is how it goes down: They guy who invented this religion was a smart man. He knew people could be controlled by the fear of the unseen and unknown (basic Psychology) he knew that a financially-driven cult based on an undisporvable theory could fork in millions and give him the sinister pleasure of power. PATHETIC WELPS! I wish anonymous every luck with dismanteling the church of $cientology!

  • Me to, it doesnt even have the historical value that chritianity or even islamic religions have scientology is a bunch of bullshit stick to to the real religions, the worste thing about scientology is is that when people come out of it it they are very dispondant to other religions and are often atheist because they got screwed over so badly in this one false religion, sad really down with scientology, i to wish anonymous luck with the dismantling of the cult

  • @thomas242007

    The other religions are just as bad, I don't see the differences between any of them.

    All it comes down to is false beliefs and mythology.

  • @LanteanKnight

    Well, the cultist practices, the agressive stalking, the blackmailing, the excomunnication, the abuse of financial power and legal suits, their access to the administration and media...

    Do make it slightly more fucked up for the average westerner.

  • I hope they learn what are dimensions and how they work for next time.

  • christainity is a joke, and pretty much every religion. who gives a shit what happened like 10 thousand years ago. all that its doing is starting wars

  • set up but so funny

  • HAhahahahahaahahahaaaa, this is the best thing I've seen for a looooong time <3

  • $350,000 hahaha LOL. I would get that money playing Grand Theft Auto easily, CoS, milking your titties out of money.hehe

  • I understand this is fake but this is no more insane than any other religion.

  • people drawn to it are more crazy.

  • ahahah this is great it is a JOKE btw.well done to tha dude on the left real good acting,this is actuly what scientologist act like mad muther fuckers.

  • Needs a little work.

  • WTF

  • The part about this that isnt funny is that Scientologists actually believe this.

  • Are you joking? That's the funniest part.

  • Comment removed

  • Is this a fuckin joke? The interviewer has a lot more sense than this idiot.

  • scientology is the antichrist

  • Scientology is JUST another religion that rejects Jesus is God.

    Reincarnation...um, no.

    Eternal Life...um, yes.

  • What do scientologists think about Love?

    Make Money, Make More Money, Make Others Work so as to Make More Money!

    What do scientologists say about Hubbard?

    All lies.

    What does Hubbard say about Hubbard?

    Nothing but the truth so help me Source!

    When does a scientologist achieve the state of Clear?

    When none of their checks do?! {oo}

    Why do scientologists deny the existence of Xenu?

    Cause they know once you admit it, you go mad!

  • How many scientologists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    One. But he must first sign a billion year contract! lol

    What came first, the chicken or the egg?

    I'm sorry but that's classified information which can only be rvealed after one does the Advanced OT Levels of $cientology.

    Why did Charles Manson get into Scientology?

    He wanted to KILL all his body thetans?! =)

    Why doesn't Scientology have any dogma about God?

    Because there can only be ONE SOURCE! {oo}

  • This is very sad. Belief is stupid.

  • this belief is stupid

  • Hey, I know you, how random that you showed up as like a video recommended for me hehehe :-p

  • Upon the death of L.R.H. David Mischavich stated there was a new OT level OT9 meaning Hubbard was working for Scientology after his death.

    No wrong the guy O.D.ed on pills and alcohol.

    The problem with OT9 is that Co$ can't make any money off of a dead person.

  • scientology is a fucking sad joke. his son is being denied psychological help because of their stupid-ass "religion".

  • Its not right when people have to protest anonymously,because they fear for their own safety. Its not right when John Sweeney from BBC panorama,was followed and intimidated at every turn. Its not right when private investigators show up on the doorstep of a protester,illegally harassing him. The evidence is damming.Scientology lies,Scientology is sneaky,Scientology is vindictive,Scientology is nasty. Its not right. Google "Scientology scam" to find information on this evil cult.
  • What debate? There is no debating that people who could believe that obviously false "religion" are either crazy or pitifully stupid. Unfortunately, there are a lot of both kinds of people in the word. Scientology preys on the pride of the vain and egomaniacal.

  • is this supposed to be funny?

  • no......very sadly.

  • lol, Bob' shirt is funny.

    "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, and used against you."

    :P

  • Google "Scientology scam" to find information on this evil cult.

  • eh bob is one fat fuck

  • Lol, this is a spoof on interviewing a scientologist. I give it kudos.

  • u chat shit u fucking wasted paki

  • Youtube is freezing the view count of all anti-scientology vids, as well as preventing them from being on the front page. Anon must make note of this during the 3/15 raid. Spread this to the rest of youtube and the chans.

  • Hey Bob, what does dianetics say about being overweight?

  • dianetics say you are an SP the same way islam calls you an infidel. Try to compare, Though I'm sure Scientology hasn't taught you how to make simple comparisons during your farming class on the Scientology cow ranch.

  • fucking gringo. go to hell vato

  • how about this gringo puts a german axe in your skull and makes a beer cup lol "racist" fuck your mexican spanish you all sound like children to me no body can hate like a german remember that bean brain.

  • how about writing in English?

  • What would Tom Cruise say about this? LOL

  • He would say: "hehehe! wait a minute...hehehe! you got it all wrong! I mean, I mean hehehe! you have to look at it from what we (then go completely off course without answering a question by saying) believe in...hehe! I understand... I really do. You're either in or out! It make so much...hehehe! so much...heh! sense!!!

  • ooh good tunes at the start....

  • its like theyre acting

  • ohp yeah this is definitely fake

  • 200,000 only.....done wonder for my money loss.

    tom cruise is a nut cake.wow

  • Scientology is proof that the human race (partially) has reached a whole new nut level.

  • /agreed

  • quite sad, i know...

  • its not much different than other religions.Catholics think a guy was stuck on a cross,died,then came back to life.Jews think a guy split the ocean so everyone could get to the "new land." All religion is bullshit

  • That is why I said a "new" nut level.

  • while i agree that at least most religion is bullshit,Scientology is probably one of the most dangerous,insidious chunks of bullshit available

  • You sir, are an idiot.

  • NO IM A GENUIS

  • Umm...you only named two religions, so how can you refute religion if you dont give examples of them all?

  • I agree it is pretty much impossible to disprove religions such as Confucianism that do not have God nor spirits, but guides followers with Moral Virtue.

  • confuscianism sounds confusing just kidding thats kinda cool so thats what it is sounds like more of a beleif than a religion

  • His stories aren't even all that good, it all feels like a shitty episode of star wars or something.

  • Google "download secretdox.rar" to get hundreds of official scientology documents - including all the OT levels.

    Read about the story of Xenu in Hubbards own handwriting.

    International scam.

  • I've heard you can get copies of all the secret documents at the swedish state archives aswell.

  • Scientology is a cult. A gobal scam.

    L. Ron Hubbard was nuts. His space opera and alien ramblings is crazy stuff and anyone that believes it should get their Jedi costume on and go to the nearest Starwars convention. vaLLarr, the short bus is waiting for you. Now, put your helmet on and be a good boy today. ;-)

    "Make money, make more money, have others make money for you!!" LRH

    :-)

    watch?v=UnUbdAw9V4Y

  • vaLLarrr can't prove noting. And Scientology worshiped L.Ron and there is no proof that Scientology works at all if you think it works then why is there OT super powers and why do we come from clams like L.Ron said i thought we were aliens oh something like that?

    You can't prove noting at all vaLLarrr.

    Enjoy you're day vaLLarrr theres noting like a lair to speak to us all.

  • So you attack me becouse i speak the truth nice to know that.

  • "So you attack me becouse i speak the truth nice to know that....

    actually, no.

    the reason is that you're a bigot.

    AND an imbecile.

  • I never called you a name so i don't hate you for calling me names no matter what you call me.

    Love and let live thats my matto.

    Sie sind Gehirnwäsche mein Freund um Hilfe bitte.

  • "I never called you a name"

    really.

    you said, "Enjoy you're day vaLLarrr theres noting like a lair to speak to us all.'

    I guess you don't consider "lair" a name, huh?

    nice try.

    and I don't hate you either.

  • You sir are one and i speak only the truth remeber and calling someone a lair and diffrent then calling someone a name.And Co$ is the biggest lie in the world.Think before you reply to me and repeating is not way to speak to someone oh sure you can repeat what i have said does that mean you are right.

  • 'You sir are one..."

    oh, so you DID call me a name, huh?

    you said, ""I never called you a name"

    so that makes YOU the liar!

  • lol he only spent 20 000$

  • WTF is this after school special????

  • ʇǝu˙nuǝx˙ʍʍʍ

  • ŵŵŵ·xenu·net!

  • this is hilarious... what college station was this done for?

  • alright guys if u keep this up ill turn this car around. so help me xenu ill do it!

  • -----

    No? Sad. Reality is fun. Reality is better than dreams and videogames. And certainly better than mindfuck. Farewell losers at life, I'm back to work.

  • FUKKEN THETANS!

    Sometimes I ask myself how can I be so tolerant and friendly to people who act weird and look weird and speak crap? Talking to a scifag, no matter in person or online is always a weird experience. Why should I? They are a part of a dangerous org that wants to take over a planet and establish fascism-like regime? Yep, but still this is all weird. Don't you scifags have a sense of reality?

    ----

  • THETAAAAAAAANSSSSSSSS THEY ARE EEEVERYWHEEEEDERE

    you just can't see them.

  • THETANZ!!!@!!

    THETANZ!!!@%&^@

  • 'Scientology - is it the truth?'

    Lolwut?

    This Indian guy looks sick.

  • "I have proven many times that -..."

    stating something does not "proof" make.

    and where is it "proven" any psychiatric "diagnosis" is true, in the FIRST place?

    nowhere?

    ah, that's the answer I was looking for, thank you.

  • "stating something does not "proof" make."

    L Ron's tech states that blidness can be cured, and that asthma can be cured. This is a complete lie.

    If this were the case, then there would be no blind people left on earth.

    The tech is a lie. It is science fiction garbage.

  • "The tech is a lie. It is science fiction garbage....'

    taznc25

    stating something does not "proof" make

    vaLLarrr

  • "stating something does not "proof" make

    vaLLarrr"

    L Ron Hubbard states that the "tech" can cure blindness, radiation poisoning, asthma, a tech used for over 50 years, not one case can be presented where this has happened.

    The burden of proof is on you to show that the tech works. What's that? You can't show us one verifiable case? That's what I thought.

    More lies from L Ron Hubbard, a paranoid schizophrenic, child molesting, racist, convicted criminal.

  • 'L Ron Hubbard states that the "tech" can cure blindness, radiation poisoning, asthma,..."

    David Miscavige claims that it cured his asthma.

    So?

  • "David Miscavige claims that it cured his asthma."

    We already know Miscavige is a liar. Watch him lie about L Ron taking his own life to continue his research, even though the coroner's report states that LRH died from a stroke.

    watch?v=aON8Mqk3X8Y

    So? One verifiable case of the tech curing blindness, radiation poisoning, or asthma from a source other than the liar Miscavige, please. Oh what's that? You don't have any? That's what I thought.

  • "Watch him lie about..."

    yea, that wasn't a lie.

    so?

  • On Miscavige-

    "yea, that wasn't a lie."

    Sure it was. People can judge for themselves. The coroner's report states that L Ron Hubbard died from a stroke. What is David Miscavige trying to cover up? Why does he lie in this video about L Ron committing suicide?

    watch?v=aON8Mqk3X8Y

  • "The coroner's report states that L Ron Hubbard died from a stroke. ..."

    so?

    how do you know that he didn't GIVE his body the stroke.

    that is what is claimed anyway.

    whether YOU believe it or not.

    who cares anyway?

    not ME.

    only YOU apparently.

    again, so?

  • "how do you know that he didn't GIVE his body the stroke.

    that is what is claimed anyway."

    Like Blind people are blind because they used their superhuman powers to burn others down with their eyes. Superman was a Scientologist! Oh I see.

    get real. When are you going to grow up and realize superheros are just in comic books and other forms of Science Fiction like the cult of scientology that you subscribe to.

    Theta, Theta see ya lata!

    Wonder twin powers, activate!

  • 'get real. When are you going to grow up ..."

    your ridiculous and sophomoric response shows that you are not worth responding to.

  • vaLLarrr:

    Scientologists don't mention L. Ron Hubbard having a stroke. In fact, a stroke is a medical illness, and L. Ron Hubbard could not appear to have the ability to contract any worldly illnesses, which is why his remains were cremated so quickly. Do you believe that L. Ron Hubbard is now living on a planet one galaxy away, performing "higher level spiritual research?"

  • oh, you mean the guy that PROFITS from scientology the MOST?

    thats just gullibility, yo.

  • vaLLarrr:

    Asthma has been known to go away on its own as people grow and age. The fact that David claims Scientology can cure disease and make you successful at whatever you do is a lie, which is why they must state that Scientology has no medical basis and cannot actually cure disease in each book they publish.

  • 'You do not believe medical studies, so I can not prove it to you..."

    you can't even show me a medical STUDY that says it's a psychosomatic illness.

    "genius."

    you have only "proven" that you know nothing.

  • "Prove it with objective medical studies. ..

    you are saying that it IS a psychosomatic disease.

    the burden of proof is on you.

    "genius." lol

    ho hum

  • "There is no study, objective or not that proves the Tech works....

    we agree on nothing.

    especially on "studies" that prove anything in psychiatry works.

    and Alzheimer's is not a psychosomatic disease at ALL.

    shows what you know, "genius."

    nothing, that is.

    ROFL

  • vaLLarrr:

    Psychosomatic diseases are caused by mental processes of the sufferer. They either have a psychological cause or psychological symptoms. Brain damage results in many psychological symptoms. Alzheimer's can occur do to stress, which is considered psychological. So, technically Alzheimer's is a psychosomatic "disease" because it can have a psychological cause and definitely always has psychological affects. You shouldn't insult others, it doesn't make you look good.

  • ""Theta, Theta, see ya lata!"...

    as I said, how sophomoric.

    and I suggest YOU google Lobotomy Nobel Prize, and see just how "objective" the medical profession is about their "studies."

  • "vaLLarrr- Please show us all a study, with OBJECTIVELY verifiable results that Scientology Tech works...."

    sure.

    just as soon as you can show me a study where you substitute "psychiatry" for "Scientology", and show us all a study, with OBJECTIVELY verifiable results that psychiatry "tech" works, and the subjects weren't faking it, or weren't paid to "obtain" a certain result.

    or that they all had a "chemical imbalance."

    take all the time you need.

  • vaLLarrr:

    There are many studies showing that psychiatry and medicines created by psychiatrists, as well as those created for psychiatric purposes, work. Medicines are generally tested before their use is allowed. Most likely the subjects of Scientology were faking it or were paid to say that the "tech" works, because they were creating commercials, and now they have to state that it doesn't work in the first page of each book the publish.

  • "So is medical advice from psychiatrists. People should not have their cult tell them psychiatrists are ALL bad. ..."

    they don't. Thomas Szasz comes immediately to mind.

    just the VAST majority of psychiatrists, who almost ALWAYS prescribe a mind altering drug, instead of sending them to a psychologist and trying pure cognitive therapy FIRST.

    which they almost NEVER do.

    so?

  • "Just because Scientology makes you feel better, does not mean it works against anything..."

    that's true.

    that is for the person to decide, one way or the other.

    so?

  • "that's true.

    that is for the person to decide, one way or the other."

    Actually there are objective tests for whether or not things work. There are a number of claims made by scientology with regards to abilities gained at various levels - none of which have ever been scientifically validated.

  • "There are a number of claims made by scientology ...."

    to my knowledge, any "claims" made are things that HAVE happened during the process of auditing. Not that they are nececessarily "reproducible" on demand.

    LRH also says, "it takes as long as it takes."

  • If it is not repeatable on demand, it is not science. If a result can not be reproduced in a controlled setting and/or was never observed by an unbiased observer or recorded for later observation and/or analysis - then it can not be considered factual.

  • "Actually there are objective tests for whether or not things work. "

    it depends on what you mean by "work."

    there is no way to "prove" that something "worked" by making your "depression" better, or "cured" you of a "phobia."

  • We select a group of people with an extreme phobia and no prior knowledge of scientology. Individually we expose these people to the cause of their phobia and measure physiological responses to establish a baseline. We then introduce a control group that has no phobias. Randomly, subjects from both groups undergo either scientology auditing or a session of psychoanalysis. Then we re-introduce the stimulus and measure physiological responses again. This is a rather simple double blind study.

  • "We select a group of people with an extreme phobia..."

    yea, one SLIGHT problem.

    how do we "prove" they had a phobia in the FIRST place?

    because they "say" they do?

    what if they're lying?

    how does one prove that one has or doesn't have a phobia?

    or any "neurosis" for that matter?

  • "how do we "prove" they had a phobia in the FIRST place?"

    Which is why you perform the study on a reasonably large population (say 20-50 in both test and control group) and do not inform the subjects in either test or control groups as to the purpose of the study. The bottom line is it is possible to structure an objective scientific study for this.

  • "Which is why you perform the study on a reasonably large population .."

    how does the size of the population "prove" or "not prove" whether any or all of them actually HAVE a phobia or whether any or all of them are lying about it or not?

  • Given that none of the participants know the purpose of the study, none of them have a reason to be deceptive. However we have to allow for a small chance that someone would make up a phobia just for fun/attention/pathological lying. Increasing the size of the population will marginalize this "incidental" deception and will make statistically insignificant for the final results. All of these are basic principles of conducting studies.

  • "Given that none of the participants know the purpose of the study, none of them have a reason to be deceptive...."

    one does not have to have a "logical" reason to be deceptive.

    for instance,

    Munchausen syndrome is a type of factitious disorder, or mental illness, in which a person repeatedly acts as if he or she has a physical or mental disorder when, in truth, they have caused the symptoms.

    continued

  • continued ...People with factitious disorders act this way because of an inner need to be seen as ill or injured, not to achieve a concrete benefit, such as financial gain. They are even willing to undergo painful or risky tests and operations in order to get the sympathy and special attention given to people who are truly ill. Munchausen syndrome is a mental illness associated with severe emotional difficulties."

  • furthermore, one would have no way of knowing if any or ALL of the participants had a hidden agenda, to "validate" the efficacy of a psychiatric drug for some drug company, for instance, and were "paid" participants.

    studies such as you mention, where the "results" cannot be "OBJECTIVELY" verified, are by nature, not "proof."

    they are subject to all kinds of manipulation, since one is not measuring a PHYSICAL phenomenon, that verifiably corrolates with a subjective phenomenon.

  • I have acknowledged that some degree of deception is possible in any study. I have also outlined standard approaches to marginalizing such to the study outcome. You seem to be fixated on showing how scientology claims can not be proven. Why don't you propose a way to clearly and objectively demonstrate the beneficial effects of scientology? After all in science claims have to be proven.

  • "You seem to be fixated on showing how scientology claims can not be proven...."

    you make a good point. I contend that Scientology claims could be verified in EXACTLY this way.

    the only problem is that the subject is so controversial that obtaining an objective cohort of subjects might be impossible.

    but personally, I think it will eventually happen.

    but Scientology no longer trusts the "Scientific" "mental health establishment."

    since they have their OWN agenda, in MY opinion.

    so?

  • You do not need objective subjects for the study. That is the whole point of the double blind study - the subject do not know if they are receiving a treatment or the placebo and the testers do not know if they are treating someone with a problem or a healthy individual. Besides, how could a person pretending to have a phobia get one on a trained scientology auditor. Wouldn't that be automatically detected?

  • 'how could a person pretending to have a phobia get one on a trained scientology auditor. Wouldn't that be automatically detected?..."

    I have no idea what this question means in English.

  • "one would have no way of knowing if any or ALL of the participants had a hidden agenda, to "validate" the efficacy of a psychiatric drug for some drug company, for instance, and were "paid" participants."

    Here we go - the usual scientology anti-psychiatry paranoia.

    I chose to use Occam's Razor. The reason scientology's various claims have not been proven to be true after all these years is not because of the lack of scientific protocols, but because these claims are simply not true.

  • "I chose to use Occam's Razor. ..."

    ah,here we go. the usual psychiatric anti Scientolgy propaganda.

    I am using Occam's Razor as well.

    since it not a verifiable "Law of the Universe," and open to debate, that is meaningless.

    just because Scientology doesn't trust the "scientific community" as it is now, in no way "proves" that "these claims are simply not true."

  • Propaganda is stating something that is untrue. You yourself have admitted that none of the scientology claims have ever been scientifically proven. When I propose a test you start babbling about someone being paid by drug industry or some such nonsense. It looks like either a paranoid delusion or a refusal to test something that you know will fail the test. The fact that scientology is afraid of putting its claims to the test surely looks suspicious.

  • "Propaganda is stating something that is untrue. You yourself have admitted that none of the scientology claims have ever been scientifically proven..."

    first of all, not "scientifically proven" doesn't automatically="untrue."

    it just means "unproven." as in "yet."

    or "perhaps never will be."

    but that is not necessarily "untrue," therefore not propaganda.

    furthermore, Scientology makes no "claims" to be "believed."

    only if one "experiences" something oneself, should it be "believed"

  • 'Actually if you google that, Cocaine may contribute to depression. SO again your point is meaningless...."

    well gee, if you google "prozac" you will find that it ALSO may contribute to depression AND suicide.

    so YOUR "point" is meaningless.

    AGAIN.

    gee, I hate being right all the time.

    (not really, lol)

  • "There are medical studies that through trend analysis show anti-depressants work...."

    yea, just like alcohol lowers people's inhibitions.

    I'm sure this "proves" to you that "shyness" is a chemical imbalance in the brain, and alcohol "cures" it.

    what an absurd contention, that just because a drug makes one "feel better," that means they "work" against some "diagnosis."

    like just because people "self medicate" with cocaine, which makes one feel "good," it must "work" against "depression."

  • ""know PLENTY of people, including myself whose lives have been improved by Scientology."

    To use your words vaLLarrr-

    You make the claim

    "The burden of proof is on you"..."

    sure.

    that's like "proving" one is in love.

    and just HOW would one "prove" that?

    oh, they can't?

    gee, I guess that means it couldn't possibly exist. lol

    how ridiculous.

  • your just ignorant

  • IF Tom Cruise is a Scientologist then I am a Scientologist!

  • .....ok tilorb, im happy for u.... i guess

  • I thought I replied to this? Did you read further down the policy letter you gave reference to. If you read 18 books fully and listed to 200 hours of tapes in full,you will have a basic knowledge of the subject.

  • This video is anti intellectual and just stupid.

  • I would say same (anti intellectual and stupid).

  • 'Like for instance, NARCONON removing people from prespcription drugs abruptly...."

    this is not an official policy of Narconon, even IF someone did this.

    in fact, it's against their policy.

    and you say, "The same can't be said for Scientology...."

    that is your opinion, and it is not true. I know PLENTY of people, including myself whose lives have been improved by Scientology.

  • Get the buzz going for the Chicago Anonymous protest: Oprah is having Tom Cruise May 5th ! ! Outside the Oprah studio !

  • Is there any perfect organisation today? However the stuff on the net is distorted also introducing discredited info. I've read skeptic tank/xenu since 1986. It is not a perfect organisation, but its goals are specific and it does help others? If you met scientologists informally you would be shocked how nice they are, really. My wife was.

    Some friends and colleagues joined the Freezone but my answer is too long but essentially I believe the CofS apply Scn better if not perfectly.

  • Thanks for the answer. In that case this is commendable and sincerely you should be given a medal for dangers you faced and any injuries you may have sustained. Feeling good about helping others is priceless would you not agree? I'm an ex-member and was dissatisfied with the last services and discontinued in 1986. I read the hostile sites for years but found nothing of any worth. My stepdaughter did some low cost Scientology courses and changed from dropout to college student. Is that bad?

  • My point (Lifting a finger). So the answer is still you would not lift a finger right? I thought so. I didn't say scientologist I said anti-scientologist. Must you persist in altering everything I say and evading a question with abuse? My point is those in A.R.S tried to stop the Scn efforts through the media and complaining to the authorities but did nothing to help the victims. I was just illustrating a common thread of those who perpetuate hatred against Scientologists that is all.

  • Hubbard was convicted in France in absentia which is unconstitutional in common law. In fact they didn't know whether he was dead or alive. The war with the IRS is over. Scientology won. This is 2008. Again, a frivolous law suit by a lawyer does not make a lawyer or its client a criminal. You've been reading too many of these websites which deliberately pevert the facts out of desperation. Yes I will now continue courses as are many other colleagues.

  • @whichphilosophy

    It's been 3 yrs and a lot has happened since. My question to you is, are you still a scientologist? I reached the *level* of "clear" & did a lot of courses, incl. the KTL and LOC, among others. I was at the "Portland Religious Crusade" & helped open up the Dominican Republic to Scientology by running purifs & establishing a mission. I gave Scientology up in 2005 after 27 yrs.

  • You are copying verbatum old cut and pastes found in xenu and skeptic tank and are identical on other posts. I've seen these a lot. This is why Cabereta came unstuck when she called for a ban on Scientology 2008, The German goverment stated no evidence existed to support such. The reason I asked about helping others is most people against Scn have an adverse fear of helping others.

  • So you would not help in sucha situation. I knew so. When you save a life that is help. Not one single anti-scientologist lifted a finger during 9/11 Instead A.R.S mobilised the press to avoid mentioning Scientology or filming them. As an ex-member I began to realize how insane A.R.S. really are and don't understand why some scientologists in their own time (taking time off work) would do this.

    What were David Msicavige's words. Did he shoot himself?? I don't think so.

  • taznc25. So you've evaded the question. I will repeat it. Would you help in the event of a major disaster such as another 9/11, Chenobal etc.

  • Whichphilosphy. I live in China Beijing as a Troubleshooter for a Chinese state company. Bathing was a problem because of water shortatges and poverty. Things are improving even in the poor farm areas. So you wouldn't help in a Tsunami, bomb attack either I take it. Is that correct?

  • Taznc. Re Chenobyl. Actually I agree in part. When I did courses we were not encouraged enough to go out and help others on such a big scale. I'm at fault too. Nowadays the C of S is more organised and encourages its members to apply the tech outside. Would you also assist in such a disaster again?

  • whichphilosophy, this is the first part to the video. the other parts are in the related video section (youtube address)/watch?v=hPeTvghhd_M

  • whichphilosophy, actually thwere is a video on youtube which shows david M telling an audience that lrh took his own life. he describved it as "moving to the highest level".

  • Hubbard died from a Stroke, no one in the C of S said otherwise. Hubbard did not dictate to the Board of Directors. Choosing presidents and Chairpersons is like any other organization.

    Traces of the drug were found. It is used to treat the effects of Horse Fleas. Hubbard lived on a ranch for the later part of his life. This is common for dealing with allergies. This was conveniently missed in the 'anti' reports.

  • taznc25 Such claims lack merit and are nonfactual. Since payments are voluntary, how can these be demands? The propaganda campaign against Scientology and Scientologists is a mass brainwashing campaign according the text book. For instance non factual information disseminated for (even when discredited 60 years ago) is just one sample of controlling populations with lies. It worked in Nazi Germany.