@tabalitigi This is meant to be a launching system, not an interplanetary traveling system. The current launchers are VERY havy compared to the payload they're shipping. Every kilogram you take up to space needs a lot of kilograms of fuel and launcher to take to space. If you could use this "gun"-system for small and light satalites, or for example the solar sail you're referring to, you would eliminate a large fraction of mission cost.
@tabalitigi I understood what you said, but why? If, for small projectiles, this way of launching things is way more efficient, why not use it? The fact that it's an old concept doesn't mean anything.. We have been using launchers(rockets) for 50 years or so now so that's not really new either. It's been a trend in the last couple of years to make smaller satellites and such, and those could easily be shot into space with a projectile rather than being launched with a huge rocket.
@whohasgottenit :because we are in an age of waste...We are stuck in the mindset from the industrial age, and combustion based technology is NO WAY to travel/send supplies efficiently LONG TERM...We are thinking in the "NOW", and that now is VERY archaic...The "modern" technology just needs to die off, and let the quantum age move in. I am not advocating "stopping" space travel. These "projectile based" concepts are just archaic to be nice. We are too eager to go space without a REAL plan...
@tabalitigi We do live in a age of waste. But this idea wastes far,far less because you dont need to speed a load of fuel merely to carry fuel! This design could make huge savings and increase access to space within a decade. I'm all for research into space-elivators and other more efficiant designs. But this is "now" tech, a space elivator at best is 50 years away.
@GoogleTech Talks G'day, nice clip, if a tad fanciful... If ya enjoy looking at hardware that's real, try searching 'solar thermal ramjet', & see where NASA managed to come 2nd to an Australian Hillbilly ! 'Twas but a 5th-Order Design-Priority, but one couldn't resist... Search 'sunfoil' for interlocking clips covering all aspects. Open Source, view the Data on the "Science" clip; the "Short-Talk" includes the CSIRO Evaluation. Enjoy... Ciao !
Is this an exclusive American project ,or are there other countries doing this as well,and if so,are they ahead of the USA?This technology is absolutely fascinating.Does anyone know if there has been any big strides taken place in space elevator technology?I do understand that nano(nanotubes) technology is the most important accomplishment if this has any possibility of ever working some day.Would this be an accurate statement ?I know there are many other hurdles/barriers to jump as well.Thanx
After accidently coming across this utube site(previously I was just checking out all types of sites which had NOTHING to do with science,period),I'm coming to the realization that I'm not a dumb person.I never finished high school,but eventually got my GED(Good Enough Diploma),but anyway,I had this idea about 20 years ago of building a gigantic gun that would shoot projectiles into space.
My concerns were the same as this man speaking,and that was the effects of G forces on electronics.
@MoxieChan do the math .. you only need a slide rule paper & handheld portable graphic inerface device. it's not that difficult it's been done since ernst mach & the 13th century.
@MoxieChan 've noticed lots of that happening too. i was searching for knox's the matrix reloaded, and a breast feeding video came up in the right hand side ..
search Gerald Bull Space Gun on this site he was the originater of the space cannon almost built one but was assasinated before he could finish it by the messad
This project can be used as a first step for launching into orbit of the earth materials and structural components are small and not sensitive to very high accelerations.
I think it'd be fruitful if instead of worrying about how we have come across this technology, or any of the historical arguments brought from such, we simply put energy into developing and producing such technology.
Unfortunately the only ones capable of easily developing expensive tech is either the government or rich people.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
These ideas are all cool, but really the only viable space exploration technology would be an anti-gravity based system, manipulation of the 'Higgs field' or the 'dimensional fabric'.
Intense magnetic fields may be involved though and that could pose problems.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
w00t for the nazi's figuring out to spin super fluid mercury to make a electro magnetic field vortex bending space and time :)!! and hahaha i loved the NG where they shot a missile in a small shed and said theirs no way a missile hit the pentagon.. i was like O_o that just proves these people are STUPID
it uses electromagnetized ferro fluid mercury in a supercooled state which rotates 50,000-80,000 RPMs in a small disk like generator... it goes faster than mach 50 and is what most people know as the trinagle UFOs... no those aren't aliens they're ours.
An ocean location also will absorb the shock from the recoil. However a mountain location is usually proposed for canon, catapults and rail guns to shoot things into orbit. It might be cost effective to create a man made lake or reservoir at altitude (in say, the Andes) to avoid the thickest part of the atmosphere. Lakes are not typically deep enough, but with the right engineering, this actually might be a workable modification.
@hemojr Well there's Lake Toba in Indonesia, at the apex of the long dormant Toba volcano, 2805 metres above sea level. Seems to fit all the criteris you've mentioned
I think this is brilliant. Ocean pressures help keep the barrel together. Ocean allows it to change direction easily (its very very long), and the ocean will keep the barrel from getting too hot.
Sounds very plausible. I hope they build one. (Just one as I expect there will be improvements)
I usually do not like to cite mythbusters here, but they did do tests where shockwaves from bullets being fired in water would kill a fish, so if this huge hydrogen powered gun shot off, then I would say yes, this would kill marine life in it's direct vicinity.
@ 52:30 the spinning ring toy he is talking about is called the "Zyclone Ring Blaster". I hope this helps someone else who found it difficult to understand what he said.
Why not use an electromagnetic mass driver gun?
apex02001 1 month ago
im not that technical when it comes to combustion based technology, but i find this video informative though...
iLOVENATURE2011 1 month ago
it's sad to see such smart people conceptualizing such dumb concepts...
we need to think "sailboats", not "guns" for intergalactic travel or any sort of new age interstellar travel...
This whole "projectile" fixation is fucking archaic...
tabalitigi 6 months ago
@tabalitigi This is meant to be a launching system, not an interplanetary traveling system. The current launchers are VERY havy compared to the payload they're shipping. Every kilogram you take up to space needs a lot of kilograms of fuel and launcher to take to space. If you could use this "gun"-system for small and light satalites, or for example the solar sail you're referring to, you would eliminate a large fraction of mission cost.
whohasgottenit 5 months ago
@whohasgottenit
I'm saying we need to start thinking beyond projectiles and combustion...
tabalitigi 5 months ago
@tabalitigi I understood what you said, but why? If, for small projectiles, this way of launching things is way more efficient, why not use it? The fact that it's an old concept doesn't mean anything.. We have been using launchers(rockets) for 50 years or so now so that's not really new either. It's been a trend in the last couple of years to make smaller satellites and such, and those could easily be shot into space with a projectile rather than being launched with a huge rocket.
whohasgottenit 5 months ago
@whohasgottenit :because we are in an age of waste...We are stuck in the mindset from the industrial age, and combustion based technology is NO WAY to travel/send supplies efficiently LONG TERM...We are thinking in the "NOW", and that now is VERY archaic...The "modern" technology just needs to die off, and let the quantum age move in. I am not advocating "stopping" space travel. These "projectile based" concepts are just archaic to be nice. We are too eager to go space without a REAL plan...
tabalitigi 5 months ago
@tabalitigi We do live in a age of waste. But this idea wastes far,far less because you dont need to speed a load of fuel merely to carry fuel! This design could make huge savings and increase access to space within a decade. I'm all for research into space-elivators and other more efficiant designs. But this is "now" tech, a space elivator at best is 50 years away.
twdarkflame 1 month ago
Nice closed captioning! "Foadable Tags" @ 17:40
It's 'photovoltaics' if anyone doesn't know.
williwonti 6 months ago
@GoogleTech Talks G'day, nice clip, if a tad fanciful... If ya enjoy looking at hardware that's real, try searching 'solar thermal ramjet', & see where NASA managed to come 2nd to an Australian Hillbilly ! 'Twas but a 5th-Order Design-Priority, but one couldn't resist... Search 'sunfoil' for interlocking clips covering all aspects. Open Source, view the Data on the "Science" clip; the "Short-Talk" includes the CSIRO Evaluation. Enjoy... Ciao !
WarblesOnALot 7 months ago
Phone in the middle of presentation! --How professional for a contractor competing nasa
rickypandey 8 months ago
Gerald Bull, the father of the project, was assassinated. See qvCYZ2p8yTA
contrisssue 9 months ago
Is this an exclusive American project ,or are there other countries doing this as well,and if so,are they ahead of the USA?This technology is absolutely fascinating.Does anyone know if there has been any big strides taken place in space elevator technology?I do understand that nano(nanotubes) technology is the most important accomplishment if this has any possibility of ever working some day.Would this be an accurate statement ?I know there are many other hurdles/barriers to jump as well.Thanx
demmylowther 10 months ago
After accidently coming across this utube site(previously I was just checking out all types of sites which had NOTHING to do with science,period),I'm coming to the realization that I'm not a dumb person.I never finished high school,but eventually got my GED(Good Enough Diploma),but anyway,I had this idea about 20 years ago of building a gigantic gun that would shoot projectiles into space.
My concerns were the same as this man speaking,and that was the effects of G forces on electronics.
demmylowther 10 months ago
I cannot believe I just watched all of that.
OtherworldJudge89 1 year ago
Wow. With this technology, it suddenly becomes feasible for private industry to build a space "hotel" for space tourism.
velveetaslingshot 1 year ago
watch?v=Ic4ba04_n0o
iYobo1000 1 year ago
Use a cern type of set up and launch a new Man made satelite to any planet or any moon. Voila
Noogymonster 1 year ago
Thankz for posting!... the little satellite is amazing!!!
bellrockyin 1 year ago
11 kilometres per second ?!? for how long?
and why the fuck is there a video with jennifer lopez in an ugly body suit on the right?
MoxieChan 1 year ago
@MoxieChan do the math .. you only need a slide rule paper & handheld portable graphic inerface device. it's not that difficult it's been done since ernst mach & the 13th century.
circusboy90210 1 year ago
@MoxieChan 've noticed lots of that happening too. i was searching for knox's the matrix reloaded, and a breast feeding video came up in the right hand side ..
spadehatesscrewtube 1 year ago
magnetic propulsion is a far better bet, and probably alot safer.
circusboy90210 1 year ago
@circusboy90210 At 25:15 minutes he explains why it's not a "far better bet"
cptbritain 1 year ago
@circusboy90210 opiinion & conjeecture probably a comination of the both is better.
circusboy90210 1 year ago
Help with the CC: It's "Asymptote" and "Photovoltaics"
studio7manga 1 year ago
That was crazy awsome!
lizzizzleVIP 1 year ago
T hey called it the "Doomsday gun" the Howard Bull story I think, good movie.
Mosfet510 1 year ago
search Gerald Bull Space Gun on this site he was the originater of the space cannon almost built one but was assasinated before he could finish it by the messad
deltapeco 1 year ago
If I was looking for a primer on G force hardening, where would I start?
mrdoornbos 1 year ago
This project can be used as a first step for launching into orbit of the earth materials and structural components are small and not sensitive to very high accelerations.
AVKtt 1 year ago
I think it'd be fruitful if instead of worrying about how we have come across this technology, or any of the historical arguments brought from such, we simply put energy into developing and producing such technology.
Unfortunately the only ones capable of easily developing expensive tech is either the government or rich people.
justicetrooper 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
These ideas are all cool, but really the only viable space exploration technology would be an anti-gravity based system, manipulation of the 'Higgs field' or the 'dimensional fabric'.
Intense magnetic fields may be involved though and that could pose problems.
IndrasBlade77 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
w00t for the nazi's figuring out to spin super fluid mercury to make a electro magnetic field vortex bending space and time :)!! and hahaha i loved the NG where they shot a missile in a small shed and said theirs no way a missile hit the pentagon.. i was like O_o that just proves these people are STUPID
sirsmokesalotaganja2 2 years ago
TR-3B
it uses electromagnetized ferro fluid mercury in a supercooled state which rotates 50,000-80,000 RPMs in a small disk like generator... it goes faster than mach 50 and is what most people know as the trinagle UFOs... no those aren't aliens they're ours.
this is great but is not needed anymore...
daveyboi03 2 years ago
To the Space Gun and so we end an age...
'Beware of the concussion, beware of the concussion!'
watch?v=dCle32Ofr9w
Odziz 2 years ago
An ocean location also will absorb the shock from the recoil. However a mountain location is usually proposed for canon, catapults and rail guns to shoot things into orbit. It might be cost effective to create a man made lake or reservoir at altitude (in say, the Andes) to avoid the thickest part of the atmosphere. Lakes are not typically deep enough, but with the right engineering, this actually might be a workable modification.
hemojr 2 years ago 14
@hemojr
You so funny. Recoil. hahahahaha.
And people believe you too!
1HumanKind 1 year ago
@1HumanKind
There is massive recoil! What's the joke?
XSAlexio 1 year ago
@XSAlexio your matriarchal parental units mons pubis could absorb the kinetic energy of almost any recoil.
(sorry, couldn't resist. no really, thats what she told me!)
spadehatesscrewtube 1 year ago
@spadehatesscrewtube
I know man, but your mother's seemed more fragile. I might have killed her!
XSAlexio 1 year ago
@XSAlexio ah, the games afoot.
spadehatesscrewtube 1 year ago
@hemojr Well there's Lake Toba in Indonesia, at the apex of the long dormant Toba volcano, 2805 metres above sea level. Seems to fit all the criteris you've mentioned
omikron441 10 months ago
I think the method can be used to project sun light reflective material to the orbit to reflect part of the sun light to the earth.
kmingtsai 2 years ago
I think this is brilliant. Ocean pressures help keep the barrel together. Ocean allows it to change direction easily (its very very long), and the ocean will keep the barrel from getting too hot.
Sounds very plausible. I hope they build one. (Just one as I expect there will be improvements)
brinksbury 2 years ago
A question I would ask is could there be a concern for ocean life in the vicinity if it was to produce a huge bang under water?
Sounds really interesting though and strikes me as promising given the research already conducted to prove the technology.
9ff70f96 2 years ago
I usually do not like to cite mythbusters here, but they did do tests where shockwaves from bullets being fired in water would kill a fish, so if this huge hydrogen powered gun shot off, then I would say yes, this would kill marine life in it's direct vicinity.
Krawnikal 2 years ago
look up physicists talking about mythbusters they say mythbusters set their experiments up wrong making them have to fail...
sirsmokesalotaganja2 2 years ago
Comment removed
IndrasBlade77 2 years ago
@Krawnikal
Before each shot they will fire a small non harming explosion that will only scare all wildlife away from any deadly shock forces
knight2255 1 year ago
@9ff70f96 I don't know much about this but I would suspect that most of the sound would come from the rip of the barrel (like with normal guns).
eggaweb 4 months ago
@9ff70f96 I don't know much about this but I would suspect that most of the sound would come from the rip of the barrel (like with normal guns).
eggaweb 4 months ago
I think instead of elevating the gun they should just dig cleave shaft in the ground and set the gun in it.
kenshin0694 2 years ago
This cannon is nothing short of amazing.
pu3he 2 years ago
hydrogen? Oh, the humanity!
pete275 2 years ago
@ 52:30 the spinning ring toy he is talking about is called the "Zyclone Ring Blaster". I hope this helps someone else who found it difficult to understand what he said.
watch?v=O_Cysu_NplI
roidroid 2 years ago
Informative
Qulopuaa 2 years ago 7
Wiki: Gerald Bull
iamufreak 2 years ago
~D:
lordennis01 2 years ago