Added: 4 years ago
From: domi1928
Views: 50,732
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (111)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I will continue to say it until I'm blue in the face! Show me the cases where people who have used cellphones and have developed brain tumors or have died using them. Can this fancy talking pseudo doctor give me even one case?

  • Yes If You Text U Are Getting Zapped By The Cell Phones Radioactive Batteries!!EMF Comes Of Of All Charged Batteries And Cause Tumors Near Where The Cell Phone Is Usually Located.

  • and this guy calls himself a doctor?

    talking BS and selling 'protective buttons' and 'holy water' (those webpages).

    to get cancer, DNA in cells needs to be changed. that requires IONIZING radiation- x-rays, gamma rays etc; wifi, gsm and similar are NOT ionizing.

    wikipedia: "... By the end of 2009, [...] the number of mobile cellular subscriptions worldwide reached approx. 4.6 billion, 300 times the 1990 number ..." (and now add wifi users).

    there is NO evidence between cancer and radio waves

  • A well known brain surgeon in Australia have indicated that breast cancer double it cell numbers in weeks or months. However brain cancer tooks just 16 hours at its quickest.

    So to those who enjoys the convience, don't say we did not let you know.

    Most EMR or EMF from handphones studies are made at least 4-5 yrs ago or longer. Ask how long do u use the hp on a daily basis then as compared to now. So before it take 10-20 yrs to fry yr brains, now my guess is 10 yrs before it is cooked.

  • this fool just dresses nice and talks fancy. i wanna see the facts that say this shit is true. theres so much wi-fi now adays and pretty much everything is wireless so y arent we all fucked up in the brain n shit.

  • Comment removed

  • okay okay how about texting????? texting????? are you being affected by radio activity when you text?? some one answer this for me and send me a article that backs it up please

  • @ortilia duh... is your wireless on? It doesn't matter if you have a signal, in fact it's even worse if you don't. If then = you're being affected Skippy period. Never-mind the humans in your proximity.

    But ask FCC they don't test during load balancing and they most certainly inform the telco company of the impeding piss test. and the levels they say are safe are far from it believe me.

    But its all safe for you other wise, you collapse the worlds economy for decades. Enjoy :^)

  • @UncoveringConscious These kinds of studies simply don't find funding or support here period.

    I work in this industry and I understand DSP wave propagation and the various frequencies the protocols for GSM CDMA MiMO Wifi wimax. Let me tell you the “awake ones” don't use BT and stay clear of testing areas. I could name a director of engineering for a well know company who lives by this. But what do you know; oh that’s right only what you're fed.

  • if i see you in the street Mr Carlo, i will shoot you in the face. You are a con artist playing on the insecuritys of people to sell fake merchandise and science fiction.

    Do some research people, all the companys this man has been involved with have ended up with law suits against them. BioPro? GIAwellness.

    BTW none of the information in this video is conclusive, just a bunch of jargon to make this man seem like he knows what he is talking about.

  • first your grandpa got cancer, then your aunt got cancer, then your father got cancer, then your kids got cancer....then you got cancer

  • After all we we already have screens for computers to reduce radiation We wear heavy capes for x-rays So yes the tech. does it exist The question is why aren't we implementing it?

  • When the studies showed in fact these instruments did cause adverse health effects They shut it down in other words these companies have no accountability to the human life's they have effected

    Taking all this into account It would not be hard for these companies to build shielding into their devices or any other type of electrical & electrical company to retrofit and produce already shielded products

  • @Swiperluck sounds like you give up before you began

    In fact yes we do have a technology age here to stay Unless some unforeseen cataclysm or human stupidity ends it all However all these technologies have got away scot free from using us a bank accounts and failed test subjects They have even repressed studies showing direct connection with EMF wave Look up Professor Ross Adey who was hired by Motorola when the for studies with brain cancer and cell phone connection

  • Hello please check universetechnique, universetechnique2, universetechnique3, greatsorcerer, greatsorcerer2, thaijellybean242. Thank you. Enjoy learn something new. View all my favorite. Thank me later. Be a part of what I know.Welcome to my life. You have been selected to view the opening movie trailer of the movie Touch of Fluid.Remember I was here today and time era.Where ever I go too. Many people will follow after. Thai

  • My cousin is dying of brain cancer....huge cell phone user.

  • I found this very interesting, but shouldn't there be at least a part 5 also? It seemed kind of cut of in the end of part 4. Anyway, thanks a lot for sharing!

  • Theyll never get rid of this type of wave technology, coz someone is making a lot of money out of it,

    At least when they banned leaded petrol, they had something to replace it with

    And this is probably why our kids are a bunch of fuck-wit retards

  • cell phones and wi-fi do not cause cancer and sterility

    say cell phone industry funded scientists

  • I would rather be affected by radiation for conveniance and live not as long but happily rather then live long without anything

  • You can use your landline at home and get a headset for your cell phone with an air tube. Then you have convenience AND safety from something that could potentially be harmful.

  • I TOTALLY AGREE!!

  • for your short-term convenience you would possibly sacrifice not only yrs off your life but illnesses that will make you wish you were dead! ...ur logic baffles me.

    it's a pity if ppl are not exposed to the accumulating evidence but how do you deal with people who chose not to hear and see what is given?

  • ur logic baffles me too. what can u do bout it ae? billions of cell users.. increasing market demand and unstoppable growth in technology all across the world. life is short and I live it to the fullest without worrying about the inevitable. well everyone has their own opinion and that's just mine.

  • of course everyone is entitled to their own opinions. but this is not a circumstance that i would classify as 'inevitable'. and there is a few simple things you can do to protect urself! i own a blackberry and i can assure you its features are addicting BUT i have a few safeguards like

    1. i don't keep it on my body at all (bb and iphone manuals tell u to keep ur cell phone at least 1 in away from u)

    2. use a tube piece to my ear or keep it on speakerphone as much as possible

  • 3. minimize usage in areas with bad signal like rural areas/basements

    life is very short! and i have no intention to prolong mine, i just want to ensure as much as possible that those yrs are spent happy, healthy, and grateful. and being complacent in the face of accumulating evidence that something is potentially a great risk does not go along with those principles!

  • okay yea thats one thing I agree with you i have a samsung phone and i never keep it in my pockets near my heart (chest) or anywhere else. they aren't nice to your body obviously. i just don't see a reason to freak about it or anything like that really. cellphones are too much are part of our life's and that goes for laptops, wi-fi, tv's, radio's, microwaves.... yea. and yes i would want to live healthy too and carefree.

  • @Swiperluck I agree with you completely then. Once you are informed and take necessary precautions (which you have) the rest is out of your control. My issue is that so many young people my age refuse to acknowledge these risks and spend all their waking hours with these cell phones in their pockets! It really upsets me to see this.

  • Nerve impulses do not travel at the speed of light. The fastest impulses only travel at 120 m/s. Light speed is 299792500 m/s.

  • 6:18 - gang sign for no cellphonez crew

  • does anyone else find it hypocritical to be preaching about the dangers of wireless technology while using a wireless microphone?

  • you mutherfucking cocksuckers. every last one of you

  • nope, wireless microphone put out tiny amount of power.. millivolts at the rf stage.. and low frequency RF is less abrasive anyways. hes talking about microwave radiations around 800-3000mhz

  • LOL. I saw that in the video! I like wireless technology. It's convenient and you can carry it anywhere. I just bought the latest Samsung touch cell phone. Yep, you just touch the screen and it does everything for you! I love it!

  • lool

  • We are doomed since thousand if not million satelittes will provide broadband wireless internet at infinitely faster speeds.

  • saracen frenzy and saracen rush are good

  • I don't get the gool to but everything wire-less, Wi-fi is most of the time pretty useless.

  • I dunno about some of the things he is talking about, but I do know cell phones have radiation, you can find that on cnet on which phones have the highest.

  • Lets not be swayed by such silliness. We don't need for these type of people to tell us anything when we have other things to worry about.

  • Yes, scary shit,i have noticed that people who use theyr cell phone much, become almost like a zombie. They change to more agressive and forget important things and are off focus.Seems like the microwaves disturbs the brain and personality in the long term..

  • I actually know some heavy cell phone users that are totally off their rocker. And they are in their 20's! I only thought old people showed signs of senile dementia.

  • and your name is reptilian shapeshifter, he was hired by cell phone companies, and your giving up your integrity here you must really be full of shit then huh?

  • An epidemiologist doesn't have any expertise in biology or physiology. I have no idea why he is trying to teach something that is way outside his field. He's doing a good job at presenting gibberish, I'm sorry to say.

  • Whats so hard to believe about what this guy is saying? The truth hurts reptilian... and it looks like you have an aversion to it. Their is plenty of good science that makes a definitive case for backing up everything the guy is saying. And the scary part is the potential ramifications of where this thing is heading when you consider the sheer number of people who use their cell phone way far too much for their own perceived good.

  • If you read my post, I never said anything about the safety of cell phones. I know they are dangerous.

    The problem with his lecture is that the biology he talks about is total hogwash. I am talking about the microtubules and gap junctions. I am not going to teach you bio, just open a text book and you'll see how wrong it is.

    With that said, Dr. Carlo is an exceptional and well knowledgeable Epidemiologist (not a biologist or medical scientist).

  • All I can is that cancer cases increases every year. Brain cancer in children is increases about 2.7% every year. Look it up on Wikipedia. Look at the trend of lung cancer and smoking, see a similarity. Also, look at the types of cancers that contribute to the most cases. Most related to digestion and breathing. We are want we eat and breathe, and now might be what technology we use and surround ourselves.

  • alex882000: You said there was an increase in brain cancer however I can not find the information you're talking about. Also increased DETECTION of cancer isn't the same as an increase in cancer, not that I am saying there is an increase just opening you to a possibility you hadn't realised.

    Perhaps when you come back with something more factual instead of scaremongering we can discuss this further.

  • how dumb are you guys like really RADIATION=CANCER, AND HEALTH PROBLEMS

  • well ...too much radiation does pose health problems not sure about cancer though.

  • While I cannot say definitively that cellular RF does not cause any harm (though I believe it is highly unlikely), I CAN say that this video is absolutely terrible information. The biology is completely wrong. Just about everything he says is incorrect regarding the human body. But don't take my word for it, open a basic high school biology textbook.

    I am an MD (hematologist).

  • I'm an IT consultant in the UK, my clients include Asda/Wallmart. I will no longer install wi-fi routers anywhere because of the growing evidence of risk to health. I now hear that cordless phones can be even more harmful to health than wi-fi.

    There is plenty of info out there. For example, Google "Wi-Fi: Children at risk from electronic smog"

    My philosophy now is to use Mains Lans and ethernet cables. I've also switched to an older style-wired phone. Why risk your health for wire-LESS

  • is it dangerous if u put it on speakerphone?

  • YES IT IS, BUT YOU ARE REDUCING THE RISK

  • He claims to be an epidemiologist? There is absolutely no way this dingbat has any qualifications. Everything he said about biology was 100% gibberish. Heck, everything he says about EVERYTHING is gibberish, but if he's claiming expertise in biology, he's doing a piss-poor job of pretending.

    Seems to be fooling at least a few dummies, though. Sad.

  • @errorchip:

    For which cellphone company you said you worked for?

  • Why dont you actually say what he said that you disagree with?  He is mostly talking textbook cell biology, specifically electrical communication between cells. Try again troll.

  • Funny you should say that, the things I "disagree" with him about are matters that can actually be found in a textbook. We're talking basic cell-biology definitions.

    For instance, you can try looking up "microtubules", which actually have dick-all to do with electrical communication, much less "across the body". His definition of gap junctions is slightly closer to reality, but the way he describes their relationship to microtubules is, again, gibberish.

    Take a science class, dummy.

  • Just as expected, no substance and more errors like your name implies.

    "When cells differentiate microtubules establish cell polarity and changes in cell morphology, they participate in the communication between cells by interacting with signaling molecules, and they are involved in cell migration during tissue formation"...Institute for Research in Biomedicine

  • Signaling molecules are CHEMICAL signals, not electrical, you ignoramus. And chemical signals sure as hell don't travel at the "speed of light" like this bozo claims.

    I actually had a more lengthy response typed up after that, but there's only so much I can do to compensate for your staggering lack of educationwithin 500 characters, so I will simply ask, where is the peer-reviewed scientific study that demonstrates that cell phones disrupt microtubules?

  • Sad thing is, this guy could have constructed a more plausible story simply by stating that the pain signal is carried out by action potentials along the nerve membrane: the rapid depolarization of the axon caused by the opening of ion channels. Since that IS an electrical phenomenon, he could have actually made a more plausible case for EMF interfering with the nervous system.

    But he didn't know this simple textbook fact, and neither did his audience. I don't know who to be more ashamed for.

  • The only idiot here is you. What are you qualifications besides being an internet retard?

    Quit sucking big telecoms dick and being such a apologist for the mobile phone industry. What do you know about the subject... a whole lot of nothing to jack shit is my guess.

  • You don't have to "guess" whether I know what I'm talking about -- you can find out for yourself by reading a damn biology textbook.

    And while you're at it, can you find some peer-reviewed scientific data that supports Carlo's claims about EMF effects on cells? Thanks!

  • Kphett absolutely right, telecoms is a big employer though so good luck to you.

  • And yet, if I stub my toe while talking on a cellphone, I still feel it "instantaneously."

  • no, this isnt great info, anyone with a basic understand of how science and the world works can realize this makes no sense. NO SENSE. christ, this is like the Ron Paul equivalent in the science world, you people would believe anything.

  • great info

  • I know this is important information...Please listen carefully.

  • I need to get out of this country. I'm sorry to say that America is going to suffer! The new era will be harder for smart people to come up in life, so if you have hope for something big do it now..! My advice...

  • well hertzian waves are bad,but tesla waves are safe.they can hold millions of horsepower in resonance over the earth,its also good for wireless systems like cellphones, but there would be only one or two towers for the whole world!look nikola tesla up, he worked with his technology and never got cancer or any debilitating problems, he made sure his system was safe for humans to use.also my fathers cell phone shuts down the hd tvs at the store when it rings, its crazzy how much power is radiated

  • well the idiots die first own fault unfortunately they destroy us too like someone here was saying

  • [citation needed]

  • if you are scared of getting cancer from your cell phone, just go get a PET scan regularly. They can catch when something is developing, and like aky332000 said, cancer takes YEARS to develop

    (my dad ONLY talks on his cell phone or our house wireless. he has NO cancer!)

  • So as if that means anything at all... you could say the same thing about your dad smoking like he currently smokes and HE DOESNT HAVE CANCER.

    Fast forward 20 years when emphysema and lung cancer have hit and then your logic totally flys out the f--king window. Your shortsightedness is truly epic!

  • ignorance will protect you. The studies out of europe, where they had greater cell phone

    penetration, are pretty conclusive. "crackpot

    science, right". Of course the cellular companies are going to deny it, like the tobacco companies did. The profits come first.

  • I have been burned by a bluetooth product and it happens to any one who wheres it with in mins. It is on the market now. I am sure it is from emf. Beware of motorola's s9 headset. speak up!

  • I invite users to see my videos confirming cell phone nuisances in the University of Oklahoma library. The miscreants in the OU administration have tolerated this for years and have made the campus noisy in other ways. The OU library is also a friendly host to numerous jerks with loud earphones.

  • The surface is only being scratched. Just recently emf is being linked to Autism. 20 years ago the rate of autism in America was 1 in 10,000. It currently stands at 1 in 150 and climbing.

  • @moffin01 Provide your proof. EVERY group that doesnt understand something claims it causes autism. peta says cows milk does it. MADD claims alcohol does. And provide the source of your statistics, prove it is not made up on the spot or exagerated.

  • cell phones cause brain tumors,in my case after 7-10 years.u still don't believe me.check out the link on the bottom of my site for some photos of what nearly killed me & mobile phones DO cause brain tumors.you will see soon a huge epidemic very very soon.4 all the people glued to the phone you are most as risk,have you headaches,mood swings,loss of concentration,poor sleep,children under 12 most at risk,take this seriously please.

  • Oh yes let the truth be told ,the ones that are stupid will get a brain tumor then will be saying you guys were right.Don't believe it and you fall right into the cigarette lobby's hands thats why they invested in cell phones.

    Oh you didn't know that?

    Hey I guess you think smoking is harmless too.

  • stupid, continue to fry your brain then!

  • The truth scares ya doesnt it... Too bad that reality doesnt fit in your with convient world view but if you come down with some serious health issue as a result of being an ignoramus... dont go home crying to ya mammie because WE TOLD YA SO!

  • Dont be an ignorant ass. If he ends up getting sick because of this shit, you should feel deeply sadneded. If this stuff is real, than it means we've been lied too by the people who claimed what we invested in was safe. I would suspect he would cry if he ended up with a brain tumor, who wouldnt? Thats a very shitty way to go. Dont be digusting, kphett. Have some compassion.

  • So will we soon be seeing the iBraintumor?

  • Soon enough Im afraid, seriously is this "convience" something your willing to risk your life for?

  • this guy is the most often quoted person on the Internet regarding wireless and he works out of a non-profit. that seems pretty legit to me...

  • Dr. Carlo sounds excessively alarmed, no matter how pays him.

    If the effects of cellphones would be so extreme, then we would see tausends of injured persons. But the no-termical effects of electromagnetic waves are subtle. Maybe they rise Your cancer risk, but this things are difficult to meassure.

    So use Your headset and be happy...

  • We use this cin't of modulation only the last years. You must lissen good.

    It is not the amound of power thats the problem.

    It is the frequens off modulation that the use.

  • So when do You expect to start widespread deaths? Or how many cellphone calls make LD50?

  • Palivier you talk like a naive kid. (1) NOT everybody develops cancer (2) cancer takes YEARS to develop

    so people can use their mobiles have children that will buy more mobiles etc... and the mobile producer will be happy. Then, if someone get cancer well, it will take tens of years to prove a direct role mobiles, you know like the cigarettes, it took 40 to ban them from the public places [and only in some countries]

  • Can You tell me what exactly did upset You?

  • I don't use the mobile because I'm AWARE of its effects, but being surrounded by dumb monkeys that use mobile phones all the time without any regard to others upsets me! [I'm sure that you are one of them].

    Fucking bastards get a tumor by your own and do not involve others!

  • What do you mean not everybody develops cancer? Im pretty sure just about anything that lives can get cancer.

  • grrmonkey: I meant that some people are genetically predisposed to do not develop certain types of cancer

  • k should have said that. =\

  • I don't buy this story about "predisposition" to disease. I've never heard of genetic diseases, if you parents have diabetes you may also get the disease? Well if you eat the same sugary foods as your parents you will get diabetes, no so called "predisposition" needed.

  • Esiosan: I don't know much about diabetes, but definitely certain [NOT all] types of tumor need a genetic predisposition to develop, otherwise they will not develop no matter what someone does.

    Going back to the mobiles, I guess that nobody would like to gamble their health hoping to be "immune" to radiation. In other words, genetic factors can only explain the individual variability [e.g. time necessary do develop the desease, exposition, etc.] but cannot be used as an excuse.

  • you should take a biology class dipshit.

  • Thanks for posting, this is extremely interesting

  • thanks for posting this up..

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more