Dr Judy Wood Pt 1 - DEW & 9/11 - March 16 2010

[uutttg]

Nothing in Dr. Woods book "Where did the Towers Go?" has been refuted. Thats what makes her case so strong, she simply uses the available evidence. Fantastic book and a courageous woman.

[LOPRESTI68]

DR. JUDY WOOD IS A BRILLIANT SCIENTIST AND A TRUE TRUTH SEEKER WILLING TO GIVE HER LIFE FOR ALL THOSE WHO LOST THEIR LIVES THAT MORNING. I BELIEVE EVERYTHING THIS WOMAN IS SAYING IS THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH THE EVIDENCE IS WAY TO OVER WHELMING AND NOBODY WILL DEBATE THIS WOMAN CAUSE THEY NO THEY CAN NOT. THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT COULD DO THIS IS OUR OWN GOVERNMENT. USING THIS GREAT TECHNOLOGY FOR EVIL INSTEAD OF GOOD WHAT A SHAME. YOU BETTER WAKE UP PEOPLE

[2000tc88]

@LOPRESTI68 Her book along with Andrew Johnson`s book "9/11 Finding the Truth" go hand in hand.Andrews book goes BEHIND the scenes into E-mails and other forms of correspondence with people who have hung SHIT on Dr Wood,showing how they are working VERY hard to keep her side of the story QUIET,Why,because she is right on the MONEY.

1945,new weapon unleashed.

Atomic Bomb.

2001,A Newer Weapon Unleashed.

D.E.W.

Is it that hard for people to understand.

[Spindry96]

Why do they talk like children? Claiming the towers disapeared in a puff of smoke.. Claiming free fall speed too, um free fall speed would have been a 300 km per hour descent not the actual 200 km per hour.

[MrNohatin]

this woman is so smart I wanna smell her fart

[alexander211974]

preaching to the converted

[914light]

WOW !! EXCELLENT interviewer !! he did a great job !! she is so EXCELLENT when she NOT under attack.....very nice to hear an interviewer who recognizes her expertize and is willing to learn from her !!!!

@ CathyFromPensacola ...you did good posting this interview !! THANKS !!

[truthbetoldni]

Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition film explains how it was done and proves it..Check it out.

[2000tc88]

@truthbetoldni Are you kidding,in one part he says that the nuke was detonated in the basement taking out the centre of the towers all the way up causing them to collapse and MELT,and in another he claims that they were taken down in the same manner except from the top down.

Can`t have it both ways,he sucked you right in like many others.He`s in it for the money.

[Born2Flesh]

I don't know what they used to bring down the WTC, but THE OFFICIAL STORY = OFFICIAL BULLSHIT.

[bluesman979]

I've watched a few videos now about this "DEW"/"Ray-Guns" (according to perspective ;-) ) subject and can't see *any* reasons to think "that's what did 9-11"

Ive seen the video where Hutchison claims to levitate (with hisTesla coils and whatever else he uses) a 70lb cannon ball

However its impossible to find any details about how it works, how much power it used etc and he's been unable to repeat it in lab conditions

Can you shed any light on this ? (no pun intended) ;-)

TIA

[CathyFromPensacola]

@bluesman979 Highly recomment reading Dr Wood's book, "Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Free-Energy Technology on 9/11". It is excellent!

[onefodderunit]

@bluesman979

Are you in denial of all video evidence showing the Twin Towers turning to dust in mid air?

[azdebi]

She and John Hutchinson were the first to put me on the right path to finding the TRUTH! They are BOTH very honorable and have NOTHING to gain except standing up for AMERICA and AMERICANS! God Bless them both!

[MrBullfrog9876]

I see steel being blown up and thrown up and way, way out. There are pictures of steel beams thrown a long way away and embedded in buildings, this is only done by explosives, not steal disappearing. The cars below caught fire due to debris thrown a long way igniting the gasoline. The plastic handles and thin license plates melted, paper fell from the buildings after and did not catch fire.

[yimnerr]

@MrBullfrog9876 thankyou

[pewterbot9]

@MrBullfrog9876 remarked: "I see steel being blown up and thrown up and way, way out."

So where are all those injured pedestrians? I am indeed surprised to not hear of serious injuries across the city, by flying projectiles from the towers. Yet...not a one.

[2020starman]

Progressive Disproportionate Collapse.. anyone have any input on that?..

[rocknhdsocal]

Hey , Cathy you're always welcome! whadja think? pretty creapy! You take her easy!.. Be safe!

[CathyFromPensacola]

@rocknhdsocal What do I think? I think Dr Wood is right on and I admire her courage to stand up for the truth come what may.

As painful as it may be, knowing the truth is always better than living a lie. We have been lied to and mislead in so many areas due to the controlled media.

John 14:6 says, "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."

No God = No Peace... Know God = Know Peace

Cheers & blessings to you!

[rocknhdsocal]

He's messing her up by babbling! Her interview on coast 2 coast 1st wk of May 2011

[CathyFromPensacola]

@rocknhdsocal Found it! thanks... watch?v=Ms1uUZX_g2I

[starmanskye]

Wait a minnut -- The brought in dirt (loamy clay) to construct a ramp for the hvy equipment and trucks to get into the hole, once they had excavated below grade. Not to quibble overmuch, just to clarify one of the last things Dr. Woods sed here. I sure don't buy the 'natural collapse' from airplane strikes -- TOO MANY THINGS don't add up. Esp. freefall speed.

[doughauf]

@starmanskye They still have to haul in dirt to stop the fumming or build up of pressure under the surface around the world trade center.

Doug Hauf

[dhudson369]

3 NUKES 5 BOMBS A MISSILE A DEMOLITION CREW AND A LOT OF LIES = 911

[CathyFromPensacola]

@dhudson369 Listen to Dr Wood in this May 3 2011 interview: watch?v=Ms1uUZX_g2I

No bombs but new to us technology used as a weapon.

[CathyFromPensacola]

@dhudson369 "Moreover, the site wasn't 'hot', that is, radioactive. The bathtub survived, as has been seen, making it highly unlikely that nukes of any kind were used. Additionally, the Richter reading did not show the use of a nuclear weapon. If a nuke large enough to destroy the WTC had been used, it would have registered a seismic signal greater than if the building had fallen to the ground. What the seismograph showed was that the majority of the WTC did not hit the ground." Dr Judy Wood

[dhudson369]

@CathyFromPensacola Look up anti radiation missile or ARM explosions heard before so called plane hit so whos to say that plane was not that missile although the explosion comes from within so whos to say the explosion werent just them missile being deternated from inside the missile does what it says ont the tin one thing is for sure molten metal was 50 meters under the buildings 1 2 & 7 for weeks also look at fitterman hall it was in the blast radius. i could go on and on with evidence of nuke

[CathyFromPensacola]

@dhudson369 Have you read her book or gone to Dr Wood's website to read any of her research? Do you have proof of what you are claiming or are you simply here to argue and cast doubt on her scientific findings? Just wonderin'...

[dhudson369]

@CathyFromPensacola yes i think there is enough and more proof of nukes than this new weapon she talks about im not here to say this is all BS i just simple put a statement now im getting this why are you so against the nukes a french man said it two days after 911 it took dimitri khalezov years to come out with it have you watched dimitri's videos start at part 15 also dimitri's videos get taken down this ladies dont so thats saying something in its self. i dont want to argue its a comment

[CathyFromPensacola]

@dhudson369 "this lady" lost her job/career as a university professor because of her stance. All I'm saying is read her book. Thanks!

[dhudson369]

@CathyFromPensacola also its now called ground zero do you even know what that means????

well if you look in a dictionary made before 2001 as yes they have removed it from dictionaries after 2001

just changed it like that thats saying something too. anyway.

it means a place where a nuclear bomb has be deternated. There rubbing it in everyones face by even calling it that. like i said more leads towards nukes than this new weapon

[karllegaladvice]

@dhudson369 911missinglinks . c o m

[dscomp]

Just discovering Dr Wood's work and theories. Much more believable than the CTD theory. Keep up the good work Judy!

[CathyFromPensacola]

@dscomp Here's a recent interview with Dr Wood: watch?v=Ms1uUZX_g2I

[janettkachuk]

Look at that PICTURE of the collapse!! It's pure powder!!!

[CathyFromPensacola]

@janettkachuk

Indeed!! Be sure to check out Dr Wood's website. She has TONS of photos and info.

[kolkrabe19]

Thanks a lot for this.