Nuclear Power is the second safest energy source in the world. Why are the Greens supporting Wind Power, such a vile energy source slaughtering birds and hurting our poor farmers health, when Nuclear Power is so much safer and better?
How many decades away is the technology to build these so-called safe fourth generation reactors? We could be utilising renewable energy so much more (and more pople are doing it themselves anyway) but the lousy right-wingers are hell bent on "clean" nuclear energy. Clean my ass. They truly are insane. And where would we put these safe and clean reactors righties? In safe Liberal/National electorates? You want it in your backyard than go for it.
"there is no environment group, state, national or international that's supporting nuclear power"
moron. there needs to be some serious re-education for people like this on this subject. people need to get out of this xenophobic mind frame and start building some freakin westinghouse ap1000's. nuclear is our friend.
The opposition to nuclear energy is ideological and emotional. Fourth-generation nuclear reactors have the potential to literally save the world, and we should be building them now. Without them we are doomed to global warming and/or energy starvation, both of which are threats to human civilisation.
Surprise surprise. Another long haired uninformed naive environmentalist hippie who think nuclear is unsafe. Give me a break. These people are so naive when it comes to renewable energy and have no idea the costs involved. They have no answers for the storage and backup problem and anyone who brings up Chernobyl as a reason why nuclear should not be used, I'm sorry but you're an idiot. Brooks' analogy with aviation is spot on. Good video. Nuclear is the pragmatic solution.
Also, one of the world's top nuclear proliferation experts is strongly supporting fourth generation nuclear. The truth is exactly the opposite of what Noonan would like you to believe.
David Noonan, like the other green groups, is seriously misinformed about fourth generation nuclear. His statement about fourth generation nuclear producing plutonium is misleading. Every nuclear reactor produces plutonium. He make it sound like only breeders produce plutonium. But the fourth generation nuclear actually CONSUMES the plutonium and turns it into fission products. Today's nuclear reactors don't do that. They don't consume the plutonium at all. Fourth generation nuclear is safer.
Argentina build the Lucas Heights' reactor.
Superalexmarket 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone find suspicious the 2 sponsored results appearing in a Google search of 'carbon tax'?
Now that imposed legislative dependence is certain, I wonder how soon our GE supplied nuclear reactors will be arriving?
DhrTressie 7 months ago
Nuclear Energy is the way to go!
bit . ly / cr4Ru1
If France can power with Nuclear why cant we?
randomsrvapps 8 months ago
Labor is Gay!
UncleSnub 8 months ago
Sydney has got a reactor isn't it?
niburu2012 8 months ago
3:26 Yeah right, and still aircrafts come down.
niburu2012 8 months ago
Hi,
I'm very interested in your videos, could you please tell me what was the date of the Stateline TV show that this video was ripped from?
Cheers
neddo93 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nuclear Power is the second safest energy source in the world. Why are the Greens supporting Wind Power, such a vile energy source slaughtering birds and hurting our poor farmers health, when Nuclear Power is so much safer and better?
MarsMoonEuropa 10 months ago
How many decades away is the technology to build these so-called safe fourth generation reactors? We could be utilising renewable energy so much more (and more pople are doing it themselves anyway) but the lousy right-wingers are hell bent on "clean" nuclear energy. Clean my ass. They truly are insane. And where would we put these safe and clean reactors righties? In safe Liberal/National electorates? You want it in your backyard than go for it.
cherton 11 months ago
@cherton 2015. But we already have safe Nuclear Power Plants. These are just better ones. All new Western Reactors are fool proof.
MarsMoonEuropa 10 months ago
@odst121 sounds good, lets store all the waste in your backyard.
Kokoda144 1 year ago
should have nuclear power in australia as its cheaper and safe and the greens get very very upset
russ9356 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CLIMATE CHANGE IS A FRAUD!!!!!!!
TheNews284 2 years ago
Fast Reactor will be built in Russia at 2012. It will work on waist from previous generation reactors.
SeregaCh 2 years ago
We should have done it years ago..... Im so green Im glowing :)
TheFluffyDuck 2 years ago
"there is no environment group, state, national or international that's supporting nuclear power"
moron. there needs to be some serious re-education for people like this on this subject. people need to get out of this xenophobic mind frame and start building some freakin westinghouse ap1000's. nuclear is our friend.
krustikov1 2 years ago 2
The opposition to nuclear energy is ideological and emotional. Fourth-generation nuclear reactors have the potential to literally save the world, and we should be building them now. Without them we are doomed to global warming and/or energy starvation, both of which are threats to human civilisation.
cragwolf 2 years ago
hmm what if the terriosts attack the nuclear plant like 9/11 with a big ass air plane, then nuclear radioactive will be release and that is dangerous
jackuy12345 2 years ago
@cragwolf too bad this technology doesn't exist yet.
TheNews284 2 years ago
Surprise surprise. Another long haired uninformed naive environmentalist hippie who think nuclear is unsafe. Give me a break. These people are so naive when it comes to renewable energy and have no idea the costs involved. They have no answers for the storage and backup problem and anyone who brings up Chernobyl as a reason why nuclear should not be used, I'm sorry but you're an idiot. Brooks' analogy with aviation is spot on. Good video. Nuclear is the pragmatic solution.
ouimer96 2 years ago 8
@ouimer96 I wouldnt call them naive, it is wilful ignorance.
TheFluffyDuck 1 year ago
@ouimer96 japan?
sacattack69 11 months ago
@ouimer96 fucking hippies wreaking the world!
UncleSnub 8 months ago
Also, one of the world's top nuclear proliferation experts is strongly supporting fourth generation nuclear. The truth is exactly the opposite of what Noonan would like you to believe.
stevekirsch32 2 years ago 3
David Noonan, like the other green groups, is seriously misinformed about fourth generation nuclear. His statement about fourth generation nuclear producing plutonium is misleading. Every nuclear reactor produces plutonium. He make it sound like only breeders produce plutonium. But the fourth generation nuclear actually CONSUMES the plutonium and turns it into fission products. Today's nuclear reactors don't do that. They don't consume the plutonium at all. Fourth generation nuclear is safer.
stevekirsch32 2 years ago 2