Dude - I like your videos - you are quite gifted in pointing out ironic inconsistencies - think about the Mosque people don't want at Ground zero right? Would people protest in a Synagogue was proposed in the Wall Street area because of Bernie Madoff., Andy Fastow of Enron,, Mark Swarts of Tyco, Miliken, Boesky...get the picture. Please check our warbydeception(.)com it is the best factual documentary on 911 truth.
On the question of public health, it seems to me that the government is (for better or worse) more concerned with regulating infectious, communicable diseases caused by things like bacteria and viruses, hence food safety regulations, vaccines, etc. On the other hand they seem to put less emphasis on more general "environmental toxins", that take longer to have a significant effect, hence cigarettes, corn syrup, and petroleum are still legal. In my opinion these sorts of things should be taxed.
Wait, they were arrested for tax evasion? or for producing and distributing raw milk without a license? If its a regulated product, then its a regulated product and under the purview of the law, just like pot, just like fertilizer. If you do something illegal, even between private parties and on private property, it's still against the law afaik.
pasteurisation exists for a reason that isn't some illuminati plot. ofc the gov is overreacting but they are overreacting towards overreactors. it's an entirely stupid situation on all sides. when idiots collide, let them get on with it.
@gratex pasteurization was originally done to preserve milk while shipped across country, stored in stores for a few days, then goes into a home for more time. fresh, unpast milk will spoil in a matter of days. THAT is the reason.
factory farms, w/ their hormones & grain fed cows produce unhealthy milk so pasteurizing THAT milk is necessary. it's not necessary 4 milk drunk fresh & from healthy cows that graze on grass. so you benefit from living enzymes that pasteurizing kills
Rawesome found a way to get around what amounts to a form of gov’t racketeering, if not also a NWO food dependency. Rawesome broke a little part of the control grid--but even that much was scary enough to TPTB for them to do a raid. TPTB do not like local stuff--you can’t keep the wealth of the world in the hands of a few if you have locales making their own wealth, and that’s what this is really about--not what a cow discharges.
@yassau pasteurizing was orignally done 2 preserve milk that would be shipped, sit in stores, then sit in homes. fresh milk will spoil in days.
factory farms with their hormones and grain fed cows create unhealthy milk so pasteurizing that milk is necessary. it's not needed 4 milk drunk fresh & from healthy cows that graze on grass. so u can benefit from the living enzymes that pasteurizing kills.
@yassau pasteurizing kills lactobacillus, bifidobacterium, saccharomyces cerevisiae bacteria which is good for humans.
if you don't have unhealthy cows stuffed with hormones and living in dark factory farms in their own crap and eating unnatural grains, they won't produce harmful milk so you won't have to pasteurize and you won't kill those healthy bacteria.
How do you know when it came from a totally healthy cow? How about the farmer who managed the milk and teats? How do you know it came from a sterile system where no contaminants such as manure and human secretions came in contact with the milk? And if everything is perfect, there is still Staphylococcus aureus present in bovines and human skin, that could multiply and produce toxins, if find a proper environment, temperature and time.
@gingowitch Did you know that circumcision drastically reduces a person's chance to contract HIV? It's actually on the WHO's agenda for combating HIV. Your plan sounds like it would cause massive loss of life, is that your plan?
@mattschol Did you know this statistic is dramatically skewed by the fact circumcision is not a cultural norm in Africa? Numbers can be spun to say just about anything you want them to. Not that I condone troll ass gw's thinking, just look past the numbers. We are on proteanview's channel...
@Theonlydump No, among the African population circumcision reduces the risk of hiv contraction. I'd rather not explain the gritty details of why this is true.
@mattschol Have you read the study? The reasons given that justify this so called study, more like a poll, are so stupid and fraudulent. They say for example that the reason is probably because HIV can enter the foreskin cells and sleep there. They ignore due to American medical falsehoods about circumcision the obvious fact that circumcised men are sexually weaker than uncircumcised men and therefore have less sex. This is slavery, and it is a fraud and plot to weaken innocent people.
@mattschol There is more here you aren't taking into account. Such as: Who are getting circumcisions there? Most of them are isolated to South Africa, the slice along the Mediterranean, and Ethiopia. Now what makes these places have a higher instance of circumcision? A higher than average density of Christians and Jews. What else do these religious groups espouse? Do you see where I'm going yet, or shall I continue?
@Theonlydump Jews and Muslims circumcise. Usually Christians don't circumcise unless they are influenced by nearby or coexisting child mutilating peoples. Americans are stupid and they mutilate their children. And they cause violence against Muslims who mutilate their children at a later age.
@Theonlydump What thinking? Is it strange to you to imagine that making your penis callous and insensitive has an adverse effect of your entire body, mind, and your entire life. Ask yourself why someone would take it away from you without asking or through lies. Then put two and two together and you will see circumcision is a plot. That is the correct terminology. Perhaps you do not have an advanced body able to see such things, in which case take kung fu and yoga and meditate.
@gingowitch I apologize for the troll dig, but you are certainly way off the mark in thinking ending masturbation and circumcision will cure even a fraction of the worlds ills. I'm personally with you on circumcision being equivalent to genital mutilation. Let the kid do it when they grow old enough to choose it.
@Theonlydump It should be illegal for all ages. All the people causing violence in the world are circumcised - Americans, Israelis, Jews, and Muslims. And they fight each other, like how they gang up against each other in a locker room. Secondly, masturbation, which has only been promoted in modern times, turns a human into an abusive animal type person. Excessive masturbation in modern times is caused by circumcision, because the penis foreskin of the circumcised man is pulled back always.
@gingowitch you know it does make sense specially to people who are open minded and not blinded by the same society they live day to day...shit man even in d.c. they got an erect penis, symbolism is all over the place...what the fuck does ancient roman/egyptian architectural designs have to do with a "free" new country when it was founded, it's all scam they operate under the roman fascist law of dagon or mithras or whatever other phony diety. People need to wake the fuck up, check your water..
@fanomunoz Thanks, I drink good imported water. Circumcision is a mark of slavery. People in USA are constantly talkinga bout freedom but they are more slaves than the Africans two centuries ago, because at least they knew they were slaves and they had intact penises. USA people give you the evil eye everywhere you go if you have a strong idea in your head concerning these things. And if you act normally with this ideathey will band against you and even hurt you and touch you like animals.
As for masturbation; aren't our food distribution networks already a bit strained and uneven already to start pumping full litters of children into the world? Beyond that, do you really want a whole world of sexually frustrated people to do what most sexually frustrated people do, and resort to violence? You are also being fairly presumptive as I am an advanced practitioner of wing chun and tai chi.
@Theonlydump That is a shame. A Kung fu master is wise and compassionate. Not a child mutilating masturbator. I think you need to become exposed to happehtheory . com. Masturbation makes you blind and crippled you immature gimp.
@gingowitch Again, presumption, oh placid one... I never claimed mastery, nor my support for circumcision/genital mutilation. You know what else is immature? trying to win an argument via insult when your logic doesn't hold up. I also see the initial troll dig was fully warranted. You will not garner another response from me because I have constructive things to do with my time. Good day sir/madam.
@Theonlydump Dude, you do kung fu and you are simultaneously crippling yourself masturbating. I am doing you a favor: go to happehtheory . com and then go to google and search "Taoist semen retention" and that will be a very constructive thing to do with your time.
@mattschol Cutting off the penis entirely reduces your chance of getting aids by 97.86 percent. Cutting your nostrils off will reduce stuffy noses by 83 percent. You think you are benefitting mankind by making men lead sad, insensitive, hurtful, violent, stupid lives? I want all men to lead normal complete pleasureful lives with complete penises. So you best behave yourself stoopid before you get the rest of your dick cut off.
@gingowitch Do you even know what circumcision is? There is no reason that circumcision would lead to sad, insensitive,... lives. Do you have a source? Are you threatening me?
@mattschol Circumcision makes the penis less sensitive. Go restore your foreskin with a tlctugger and then you may begin to see what was taken from you.
No I am not threatening you - I am telling you that if you continue to be stupid and say cutting off a part of the penis is no big deal then watch out - the forces of evil might come in with an "extra" "optional" surgery of cutting the rest of your penis off in the dreary scary future. You never know.
Ed, why do you accept and endorse the notion that nonhuman animals are the property of human animals? For you to accept and promote this discriminatory concept is just incredible.
This "club" is no different than illegal gambling clubs, you pay a member "fee" and then you gamble with something like mints. This kind of member benefit exchange has been illegal since the 60's, as it makes profits for the club owner only. They are still selling a service, but frankly a spade is a spade, these people knowingly evaded taxes and distributed a product without going through the proper channels.
@morakdais I find fault with your logic. The membership of Rawesome Foods would not be members if the service Rawesome Foods provided didn't profit them as well. Hell, your example is invalid as well as these 'illegal' gambling clubs also profit those who are members as well. They provide a safe arena in which the gambler/addict is able to do what they desire to do, the dangers mostly coming from the 'illegality' of the clubs due to government edict.
@KushinLos You obviously don't understand early gambling nor the problem with these "clubs". Most Communal goods "clubs" aren't responsible if you get sick, or your animals dies, on top of that they skim out what you don't have and usually have to a premium. If exclusivity of this kind continues, then it limits and hurts others. Ask people who had no access to larder, oh wait they are all dead.
@morakdais As to evading taxes, why shouldn't someone who finds a loophole and benefits from it not use it? If I could find one that allowed me to take home every last cent I made and be reimbursed for every taxable transaction I could come across I could save up enough money to actually break out of my position in life and I find it hard to believe that anyone else wouldn't do the same in my position.
@KushinLos because we pay taxes to benefit alot of other people, and in your life you have used or been issued this money. How about we revoke your food, education, clothing and anything else that the government pays into to allow you to exist. I pay my taxes, because it helps others, you however sound like a selfish ass.
@morakdais I'm betting you pay taxes because you are forced to.
Typical socialist rambling. Keeping your own money to decide how you want to educate your children, etc., is greedy. As if a large proportion of taxes didn't go to funding no-bid sweet heart contracts, lining politicians' pockets, and ballooning useless bureaucracies. Where the fuck do you people get off? You're all modern day advocates of slavery, and you don't even realize you're the slaves.
@machaeroguy No I pay taxes because otherwise we wouldn't have anything. Would you pay for the roads or just use them expect someone else to pay? Sure taxes get exploited by people in power, but instead of infighting we should be more concerned about removing the problem. People like you accuse and complain but will never do anything about because you don't know a better way to construct a society.
@morakdais "I pay taxes because otherwise we wouldn't have anything" What a joke. Yeah, the government also makes the sun shine and the grass grow. Roads can and should be funded by gasoline surcharges which would function as a toll.
No one knows how to construct a better society. The decentralized market is an emergent phenomenon, just like evolution. The problem is, people like you think you do. Thus, private ownership of roads is either outlawed or rendered moot by eminent domain.
...for all the complaining I hear about monopolies from statists in general, they never complain about the grand monopoly of government assuming control over goods and services that would be there anyway without them. There's been lots of progress in technology and civil engineering from private firms and individuals, yet governments always somehow manage to jump in front of the parade and fool the gullible, like you.
@machaeroguy "the grand monopoly of government assuming control over goods and services that would be there anyway without them" - this view always makes me wonder if the ultimate failure of government is in education. If people truly understood our history they would know that without some form of regulation and organization (call it government, tribal council, whatever) then YES none of these goods and services would exist
@beriukay No, it's not magic. Is it magic that human intelligence emerged randomly on this little, blue dot we call Earth? Is it magic how flocks of birds and schools of fish move as one without a leader? No, it's emergence.
@machaeroguy What if schools of fish swam in a completely different way? Would "emergence" be the word you use, even if everything that is actually going on is different? Remember, phlogiston used to be a completely reasonable explanation for everything that happened. Which means it actually couldn't predict anything at all. What exactly does emergence predict, and what does it say can't happen? The strength of a theory is in the things it rules out, not the things it explains.
@machaeroguy Well a surcharge on products is TAX, wow what a genius you are! There are many better ways to construct a society, in fact ours is good, just not the people in power. How about we privatize all roads, good luck not getting gouged on the way to work, because you would have to pay in to drive on it. Every other block would be a toll booth and the other half falling apart. You obviously are undereducated which is half the problem of why we are in the state we are in.
@morakdais No, when a government puts a surcharge on something to put into a general slush fund it's a tax. When a gas station owner puts it on a gallon of gas to directly offset the cost of maintaining the road he's on, it's not a a tax, 'k Einstein? Obviously you never heard of conditional deeds, or cartel undercutting.
btw, I'm sure you would never be able to get into my profession, so don't go assuming I'm uneducated. I've read about many different socioeconomic models, and you probably only learned about two, perhaps in one of the government schools you adore so much.
@machaeroguy If this was directed at me, you haven't mastered the reply button yet. I never said I adore government education, you just have no way of arguing with facts. Well considering you seem like some who would vote green party or worse, ron paul, i would assume drug dealer, hemp necklace maker, or glassblower.
Why would I want your profession? obviously you think it's so great, yet you don't understand that your job has no bearing on intelligence, as morons are everywhere.
@machaeroguy Actually not Tax is any surcharge placed on a product or service, government or not it is still considered a tax. Also conditional deeds have never worked, if there is no render for the deed then nothing happens. Let me dumb it down for you: gas station $ ->roads, no gas station = no $ = no roads, so if the conditions aren't met by the deed than it is null. Since there isn't a gas station on every road, most will fall into disrepair. Stop your crying about this, it's sad.
@morakdais There's plenty of literature out there about how private roads could work, I'd start with Walter Block. Bottom line is, here you are trying to rip apart any theory of how a voluntary arrangement for roads could work, and in the meantime, cheering on the destruction of a successful, voluntary agricultural cooperative. Good job, useful idiot.
@machaeroguy And there is proof that it doesn't work, in fact that same idea failed in medieval europe and several times in china. Also I would like to point out that the owner of Rawesome INTENTIONALLY avoided getting a license to start a non-existant controversy. Considering that people like you find any reason to cry about the government, makes it not a successful business, but intentional failure. also his "volunteering" is more like polite slavery ha ha
@morakdais I don't why it took me so long to think of this, but there could obviously be an arrangement where the local gas station owners voluntarily contract to maintain all roads in an area. I hope I don't have to explain the implicit incentives for them to do something like this.
@machaeroguy local gas stations don't make enough money to make it viable, as they get the smallest percentage of the products worth. Here is an easier way, find a better, cheaper and more durable material to make roads out of. Then we all ensure that our roads get upgraded by our local, state and federal governments, and that they do it properly for an acceptable cost.
@KushinLos Why you shouldn't tax-evade? Because we live in communities. There are services that we have to share, which should be publicly funded. And quite frankly, the state of the community as a whole has a profound impact on the prosperity of it. Take the Scandinavian countries, for example. We might not have as many billionaires as you do, but we barely have any economic social division, a very broad middle class, everyone gets educated, everyone gets medical treatment - Prosperity is high.
@morakdais As for product distribution, those people who were and are members of Rawesome Foods are really the only ones who can legitimately be said to determine if the channels were proper or not; not anyone else who is not involved with the distribution. If the members did not think that the channels they used were proper, they would have either made the management of Rawesome Foods change the channels, ended their membership or never would have become members in the first place.
@KushinLos Except proper channels is to let the government inspect your food, all businesses that sell food are required to do so, semantics aside, they were selling access to food and service to render the food. It is highly unlikely that the people were given the necessary information to understand exactly how food regulations work, as the club obviously didn't care. The most likely is that uninformed anti-government nuts wanted to cut taxes under the guise of "natural"
Hey you never know those cows could be genetically engineered to produce crack in their milk. XD Yea it's really stupid what they did they should have left the farm people alone.
Sales taxes collected from such an establishment would be the province of the state and local governments. Unless there's some trading tariff on milk >.>... Why would the federal authorities be involved with what you would define as a state/local tax dispute? Or would you posit that the federal government was conspiring with the state/local government?
I can see your point somewhat on the ownership part of it.
However, one fatty steak, or even 50 fatty steaks, are not going to kill you on their own. 50 cigarettes will similarly not kill you. Drinking unpasteurized milk, just one or two glasses of it, can and HAS killed people due to contaminants that pasteurization would have killed off. This is why it's different.
@KushinLos It's the seller prohibited from selling. Can't sell anything that dangerous even if people did want it. Maybe you think they should be able to anyway, but that's a different argument.
@Zaunstar Who determines what is dangerous? Don't know about where you are from, but here in Idaho raw milk isn't considered dangerous and if they started to do so I'd expect that it had more to do with other dairy farmers rather than whether or not raw milk can kill you. Contaminates in anything you take into your body can kill you after one use regardless what it is.
@KushinLos Science, evidence, statistics, etc. will determine what is dangerous. What a group of people considers dangerous isn't necessarily what is objectively dangerous.
@Zaunstar I trust science a great deal, it not only made sure I could be conceived, it also ensured I didn't die of jaundice after I was born premature. I'm evidence of science improving lives as my birth brought great happiness to my parents and the family as a whole, not to mention the added benefit of my brother being born as well. I know enough about statistics work to know that one should be careful with what questions one should ask. They do contribute in determining what is dangerous.
@Zaunstar What I'm telling you is that despite how dangerous something might be, policy is determined by that group of people who benefit from it the most. Raw milk is one of those things that is desired by some people and that the people who seek to outlaw it, among other ways, benefit more then other people from it being outlawed/regulated the way they want it to be.
@Zaunstar I'm not saying things shouldn't be regulated, only that the people who use a product or service are the best in determining how much regulation is needed for them.
it doesn't matter what the government has the legal authority to do or not do. they have the guns. they have the legislature. they have the backing of megacorps.
Fuck taxes...trade when you can with your local grower, baker, butcher, artist, craftsperson, handyman, doctor, vet, tutors, private transportation, etc. If you dont have anything to trade, use a 3 way system (almost like vouchers, but with goods and services redeemable thru the third party). Get educated where you can, acquire skills and talents when you can and you can go far in this system...especially when all hell finally (hope it doesnt, though) breaks loose.
Well I agree with you but ...yes but ... it really is just a way around the regulations and thats a problem for health concerns when it will be the government thats expected to pick up the bill for emergence services and public welfare.
Public welfare just like if you had a cow in your half acre suburban lot.
I hate being the statist toadie, but as a economic progressive you gotta know you want safeguards youre gonna get a nannystate treating you as a lease only 'ownership' tenant.
@igotsissues Ha ha, I'm a SUPER-MEGA VEGAN! I only eat air and water with ALL micro-organisms and their by-products filtered out. Food is for evil dummies!
Joking aside, Great video. Although, I am beginning to understand that the term "globalism" means anything anyone wants it to mean. Otherwise, what the hell does India and China have to do with some people in the US imposing retarded laws on other people in the US? Globalism this.. Globalism that... Does the term actually mean anything at all?
Yeah I think it means that as most companies are subsidiaries of other companies in the corporate dominated world economy state policy is going to be bent to favor these multinational organizations because that keeps the government in the tax money cash crop as well.
The corporations lose money and control, so does the government to keep power directed as they like and maybe not to what the populace would like.
Are you suggesting that government employees are acting on behalf of corporations? How dare you insinuate that our courageous public servants are pawns of the power elite, that the sacred institution of voting is a farce and democracy does not work?! This is an outrage. I will vote you into punishment soon enough.
@utubehayter I feel you. I think of globalization as a movement to get all of us to rely on international corporations and banks. instead of consuming or working for only local businesses, we buy from and work for multi nationals. outsourcing to india - globalization. exchanging locally = anti globalization. nothing is localized. no community is self reliant or independent. that's what i understand it to mean anyway.
I do not understand the fetish of being "self-reliant". What is this? Germany of 1930s?... that people want autarky? If I can buy my food, my shoes and my water, then I am self-reliant regardless of what skin color the seller of these things has or what part of the planet he lives.
the supreme court ruled that the interstate commerce clause allows that regulation of any activity as long as it can be shown to have some connection to commerce, somehow.
I'm not justifying it, I'm just saying that the Government has interpretted the constitution to grant itself unlimited powers.
Well here's an ironic point of view...It is partly about the taxes, it is partly about the threat to market shares...You' re right...they don't want us finding a way around buying the garbage that big ag produces with the help of the USDA and the FDA. All of that is VERY good for big pharma...Making people sick the way it does.
But the people that are most behind this are the ones who print the money (worthless) and demand the taxes ( also worthless) . So what's it all about? DISTRACTION
Members commission includes the payment of the "Stuff" they are "distributing". You see there are many-ways to avoid paying taxes, this "members only" organization is blatantly created as a tax shelter. The gov. is not stupid.
@Ethioness Have to agree there. I'm guessing if this were really an arrangement between two neighbors the government wouldn't bother to intervene but once you have larger organizations of this type, it makes sense.
This sounds like fascism, corporatism, crony capitalism where government protects big corporations from the little people (or socialism for the rich).
Dude - I like your videos - you are quite gifted in pointing out ironic inconsistencies - think about the Mosque people don't want at Ground zero right? Would people protest in a Synagogue was proposed in the Wall Street area because of Bernie Madoff., Andy Fastow of Enron,, Mark Swarts of Tyco, Miliken, Boesky...get the picture. Please check our warbydeception(.)com it is the best factual documentary on 911 truth.
cuttervielli 6 months ago
On the question of public health, it seems to me that the government is (for better or worse) more concerned with regulating infectious, communicable diseases caused by things like bacteria and viruses, hence food safety regulations, vaccines, etc. On the other hand they seem to put less emphasis on more general "environmental toxins", that take longer to have a significant effect, hence cigarettes, corn syrup, and petroleum are still legal. In my opinion these sorts of things should be taxed.
CallMeNiel 6 months ago
People who pretend to hate America and all forms of government but would never dream of moving away. Cowards.
RonPaulHatesBlacks 6 months ago
Proteanview:
Government is a parasite. Arguing what should be taxable is like arguing which of your daughters should be raped.
sdkee 6 months ago
Wait, they were arrested for tax evasion? or for producing and distributing raw milk without a license? If its a regulated product, then its a regulated product and under the purview of the law, just like pot, just like fertilizer. If you do something illegal, even between private parties and on private property, it's still against the law afaik.
TZ3k 6 months ago
Silly person!
One doesn't drink cow piss.
One makes paint from it.
It's called "gamboge yellow".
WetlandsRemediation 6 months ago
Smash the state!
Mastikator 6 months ago
Fuck the feds
Shadowlit001 6 months ago
pasteurisation exists for a reason that isn't some illuminati plot. ofc the gov is overreacting but they are overreacting towards overreactors. it's an entirely stupid situation on all sides. when idiots collide, let them get on with it.
gratex 6 months ago
@gratex pasteurization was originally done to preserve milk while shipped across country, stored in stores for a few days, then goes into a home for more time. fresh, unpast milk will spoil in a matter of days. THAT is the reason.
factory farms, w/ their hormones & grain fed cows produce unhealthy milk so pasteurizing THAT milk is necessary. it's not necessary 4 milk drunk fresh & from healthy cows that graze on grass. so you benefit from living enzymes that pasteurizing kills
khemeticone 6 months ago
well explained!
mozadek1 6 months ago
Rawesome found a way to get around what amounts to a form of gov’t racketeering, if not also a NWO food dependency. Rawesome broke a little part of the control grid--but even that much was scary enough to TPTB for them to do a raid. TPTB do not like local stuff--you can’t keep the wealth of the world in the hands of a few if you have locales making their own wealth, and that’s what this is really about--not what a cow discharges.
freddietz96 6 months ago 2
Why should it be raw? Why can´t it be pasteurized milk?
yassau 6 months ago
@yassau pasteurizing was orignally done 2 preserve milk that would be shipped, sit in stores, then sit in homes. fresh milk will spoil in days.
factory farms with their hormones and grain fed cows create unhealthy milk so pasteurizing that milk is necessary. it's not needed 4 milk drunk fresh & from healthy cows that graze on grass. so u can benefit from the living enzymes that pasteurizing kills.
khemeticone 6 months ago
@khemeticone
Thanks for the reply khemeticone. But enzymes don´t live. Bacteria do.
yassau 6 months ago
@yassau pasteurizing kills lactobacillus, bifidobacterium, saccharomyces cerevisiae bacteria which is good for humans.
if you don't have unhealthy cows stuffed with hormones and living in dark factory farms in their own crap and eating unnatural grains, they won't produce harmful milk so you won't have to pasteurize and you won't kill those healthy bacteria.
khemeticone 6 months ago
@khemeticone
How do you know when it came from a totally healthy cow? How about the farmer who managed the milk and teats? How do you know it came from a sterile system where no contaminants such as manure and human secretions came in contact with the milk? And if everything is perfect, there is still Staphylococcus aureus present in bovines and human skin, that could multiply and produce toxins, if find a proper environment, temperature and time.
yassau 6 months ago
End masturbation and circumcision and you will end the majority of the world's problems.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@gingowitch Did you know that circumcision drastically reduces a person's chance to contract HIV? It's actually on the WHO's agenda for combating HIV. Your plan sounds like it would cause massive loss of life, is that your plan?
mattschol 6 months ago
@mattschol Did you know this statistic is dramatically skewed by the fact circumcision is not a cultural norm in Africa? Numbers can be spun to say just about anything you want them to. Not that I condone troll ass gw's thinking, just look past the numbers. We are on proteanview's channel...
Theonlydump 6 months ago
@Theonlydump No, among the African population circumcision reduces the risk of hiv contraction. I'd rather not explain the gritty details of why this is true.
mattschol 6 months ago
@mattschol Have you read the study? The reasons given that justify this so called study, more like a poll, are so stupid and fraudulent. They say for example that the reason is probably because HIV can enter the foreskin cells and sleep there. They ignore due to American medical falsehoods about circumcision the obvious fact that circumcised men are sexually weaker than uncircumcised men and therefore have less sex. This is slavery, and it is a fraud and plot to weaken innocent people.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@gingowitch You only spend a small fraction of your life having sex, so sexual energy is very very important for all other pursuits.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@mattschol There is more here you aren't taking into account. Such as: Who are getting circumcisions there? Most of them are isolated to South Africa, the slice along the Mediterranean, and Ethiopia. Now what makes these places have a higher instance of circumcision? A higher than average density of Christians and Jews. What else do these religious groups espouse? Do you see where I'm going yet, or shall I continue?
Theonlydump 6 months ago
@Theonlydump Jews and Muslims circumcise. Usually Christians don't circumcise unless they are influenced by nearby or coexisting child mutilating peoples. Americans are stupid and they mutilate their children. And they cause violence against Muslims who mutilate their children at a later age.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@Theonlydump What thinking? Is it strange to you to imagine that making your penis callous and insensitive has an adverse effect of your entire body, mind, and your entire life. Ask yourself why someone would take it away from you without asking or through lies. Then put two and two together and you will see circumcision is a plot. That is the correct terminology. Perhaps you do not have an advanced body able to see such things, in which case take kung fu and yoga and meditate.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@gingowitch I apologize for the troll dig, but you are certainly way off the mark in thinking ending masturbation and circumcision will cure even a fraction of the worlds ills. I'm personally with you on circumcision being equivalent to genital mutilation. Let the kid do it when they grow old enough to choose it.
Theonlydump 6 months ago
@Theonlydump It should be illegal for all ages. All the people causing violence in the world are circumcised - Americans, Israelis, Jews, and Muslims. And they fight each other, like how they gang up against each other in a locker room. Secondly, masturbation, which has only been promoted in modern times, turns a human into an abusive animal type person. Excessive masturbation in modern times is caused by circumcision, because the penis foreskin of the circumcised man is pulled back always.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@gingowitch you know it does make sense specially to people who are open minded and not blinded by the same society they live day to day...shit man even in d.c. they got an erect penis, symbolism is all over the place...what the fuck does ancient roman/egyptian architectural designs have to do with a "free" new country when it was founded, it's all scam they operate under the roman fascist law of dagon or mithras or whatever other phony diety. People need to wake the fuck up, check your water..
fanomunoz 6 months ago
@fanomunoz Thanks, I drink good imported water. Circumcision is a mark of slavery. People in USA are constantly talkinga bout freedom but they are more slaves than the Africans two centuries ago, because at least they knew they were slaves and they had intact penises. USA people give you the evil eye everywhere you go if you have a strong idea in your head concerning these things. And if you act normally with this ideathey will band against you and even hurt you and touch you like animals.
gingowitch 6 months ago
As for masturbation; aren't our food distribution networks already a bit strained and uneven already to start pumping full litters of children into the world? Beyond that, do you really want a whole world of sexually frustrated people to do what most sexually frustrated people do, and resort to violence? You are also being fairly presumptive as I am an advanced practitioner of wing chun and tai chi.
Theonlydump 6 months ago
@Theonlydump That is a shame. A Kung fu master is wise and compassionate. Not a child mutilating masturbator. I think you need to become exposed to happehtheory . com. Masturbation makes you blind and crippled you immature gimp.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@gingowitch @theonlydump (third post) and dude, haven't you heard of semen retention.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@gingowitch Again, presumption, oh placid one... I never claimed mastery, nor my support for circumcision/genital mutilation. You know what else is immature? trying to win an argument via insult when your logic doesn't hold up. I also see the initial troll dig was fully warranted. You will not garner another response from me because I have constructive things to do with my time. Good day sir/madam.
Theonlydump 6 months ago
@Theonlydump Dude, you do kung fu and you are simultaneously crippling yourself masturbating. I am doing you a favor: go to happehtheory . com and then go to google and search "Taoist semen retention" and that will be a very constructive thing to do with your time.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@mattschol Cutting off the penis entirely reduces your chance of getting aids by 97.86 percent. Cutting your nostrils off will reduce stuffy noses by 83 percent. You think you are benefitting mankind by making men lead sad, insensitive, hurtful, violent, stupid lives? I want all men to lead normal complete pleasureful lives with complete penises. So you best behave yourself stoopid before you get the rest of your dick cut off.
gingowitch 6 months ago
@gingowitch Do you even know what circumcision is? There is no reason that circumcision would lead to sad, insensitive,... lives. Do you have a source? Are you threatening me?
mattschol 6 months ago
@mattschol Circumcision makes the penis less sensitive. Go restore your foreskin with a tlctugger and then you may begin to see what was taken from you.
No I am not threatening you - I am telling you that if you continue to be stupid and say cutting off a part of the penis is no big deal then watch out - the forces of evil might come in with an "extra" "optional" surgery of cutting the rest of your penis off in the dreary scary future. You never know.
gingowitch 6 months ago
Man, This guy is so stupid.
TomKS88888 6 months ago
Correct, it is sad but true.
TheRenekruse 6 months ago
Raw milk is delicious.
rolthox 6 months ago
Cow piss FTW
Yahweigh 6 months ago
You are a bright man and a master of the obvious. Appreciate your videos
motorolarules 6 months ago
Comment removed
jasamdomo 6 months ago
On Orwell's "Animal Farm" the pigs stole the milk......
methuselus 6 months ago
Sorry Pro....Personal Farms are technically illegal as per S510...Read it Pro...it'll open your EYES !
Buckhead1959 6 months ago
I had this on in the background and had to start it over to hear the full effect. Love it and keep them coming.
KushinLos 6 months ago
Ed, why do you accept and endorse the notion that nonhuman animals are the property of human animals? For you to accept and promote this discriminatory concept is just incredible.
TheAnimalHolocaust 6 months ago
This "club" is no different than illegal gambling clubs, you pay a member "fee" and then you gamble with something like mints. This kind of member benefit exchange has been illegal since the 60's, as it makes profits for the club owner only. They are still selling a service, but frankly a spade is a spade, these people knowingly evaded taxes and distributed a product without going through the proper channels.
morakdais 6 months ago
@morakdais I find fault with your logic. The membership of Rawesome Foods would not be members if the service Rawesome Foods provided didn't profit them as well. Hell, your example is invalid as well as these 'illegal' gambling clubs also profit those who are members as well. They provide a safe arena in which the gambler/addict is able to do what they desire to do, the dangers mostly coming from the 'illegality' of the clubs due to government edict.
KushinLos 6 months ago
@KushinLos You obviously don't understand early gambling nor the problem with these "clubs". Most Communal goods "clubs" aren't responsible if you get sick, or your animals dies, on top of that they skim out what you don't have and usually have to a premium. If exclusivity of this kind continues, then it limits and hurts others. Ask people who had no access to larder, oh wait they are all dead.
morakdais 6 months ago
@morakdais As to evading taxes, why shouldn't someone who finds a loophole and benefits from it not use it? If I could find one that allowed me to take home every last cent I made and be reimbursed for every taxable transaction I could come across I could save up enough money to actually break out of my position in life and I find it hard to believe that anyone else wouldn't do the same in my position.
KushinLos 6 months ago
@KushinLos because we pay taxes to benefit alot of other people, and in your life you have used or been issued this money. How about we revoke your food, education, clothing and anything else that the government pays into to allow you to exist. I pay my taxes, because it helps others, you however sound like a selfish ass.
morakdais 6 months ago
@morakdais I'm betting you pay taxes because you are forced to.
Typical socialist rambling. Keeping your own money to decide how you want to educate your children, etc., is greedy. As if a large proportion of taxes didn't go to funding no-bid sweet heart contracts, lining politicians' pockets, and ballooning useless bureaucracies. Where the fuck do you people get off? You're all modern day advocates of slavery, and you don't even realize you're the slaves.
machaeroguy 6 months ago
@machaeroguy No I pay taxes because otherwise we wouldn't have anything. Would you pay for the roads or just use them expect someone else to pay? Sure taxes get exploited by people in power, but instead of infighting we should be more concerned about removing the problem. People like you accuse and complain but will never do anything about because you don't know a better way to construct a society.
morakdais 6 months ago
@morakdais "I pay taxes because otherwise we wouldn't have anything" What a joke. Yeah, the government also makes the sun shine and the grass grow. Roads can and should be funded by gasoline surcharges which would function as a toll.
No one knows how to construct a better society. The decentralized market is an emergent phenomenon, just like evolution. The problem is, people like you think you do. Thus, private ownership of roads is either outlawed or rendered moot by eminent domain.
machaeroguy 6 months ago
...for all the complaining I hear about monopolies from statists in general, they never complain about the grand monopoly of government assuming control over goods and services that would be there anyway without them. There's been lots of progress in technology and civil engineering from private firms and individuals, yet governments always somehow manage to jump in front of the parade and fool the gullible, like you.
machaeroguy 6 months ago
@machaeroguy "the grand monopoly of government assuming control over goods and services that would be there anyway without them" - this view always makes me wonder if the ultimate failure of government is in education. If people truly understood our history they would know that without some form of regulation and organization (call it government, tribal council, whatever) then YES none of these goods and services would exist
TZ3k 6 months ago
@machaeroguy 'emergent' is a synonym for 'magic': it is a black box with no moving parts, and therefore a useless explanation.
beriukay 6 months ago
@beriukay No, it's not magic. Is it magic that human intelligence emerged randomly on this little, blue dot we call Earth? Is it magic how flocks of birds and schools of fish move as one without a leader? No, it's emergence.
machaeroguy 6 months ago
@machaeroguy What if schools of fish swam in a completely different way? Would "emergence" be the word you use, even if everything that is actually going on is different? Remember, phlogiston used to be a completely reasonable explanation for everything that happened. Which means it actually couldn't predict anything at all. What exactly does emergence predict, and what does it say can't happen? The strength of a theory is in the things it rules out, not the things it explains.
beriukay 6 months ago
@machaeroguy Well a surcharge on products is TAX, wow what a genius you are! There are many better ways to construct a society, in fact ours is good, just not the people in power. How about we privatize all roads, good luck not getting gouged on the way to work, because you would have to pay in to drive on it. Every other block would be a toll booth and the other half falling apart. You obviously are undereducated which is half the problem of why we are in the state we are in.
morakdais 6 months ago
@morakdais No, when a government puts a surcharge on something to put into a general slush fund it's a tax. When a gas station owner puts it on a gallon of gas to directly offset the cost of maintaining the road he's on, it's not a a tax, 'k Einstein? Obviously you never heard of conditional deeds, or cartel undercutting.
machaeroguy 6 months ago
btw, I'm sure you would never be able to get into my profession, so don't go assuming I'm uneducated. I've read about many different socioeconomic models, and you probably only learned about two, perhaps in one of the government schools you adore so much.
machaeroguy 6 months ago
@machaeroguy If this was directed at me, you haven't mastered the reply button yet. I never said I adore government education, you just have no way of arguing with facts. Well considering you seem like some who would vote green party or worse, ron paul, i would assume drug dealer, hemp necklace maker, or glassblower.
Why would I want your profession? obviously you think it's so great, yet you don't understand that your job has no bearing on intelligence, as morons are everywhere.
morakdais 6 months ago
@machaeroguy Actually not Tax is any surcharge placed on a product or service, government or not it is still considered a tax. Also conditional deeds have never worked, if there is no render for the deed then nothing happens. Let me dumb it down for you: gas station $ ->roads, no gas station = no $ = no roads, so if the conditions aren't met by the deed than it is null. Since there isn't a gas station on every road, most will fall into disrepair. Stop your crying about this, it's sad.
morakdais 6 months ago
@morakdais There's plenty of literature out there about how private roads could work, I'd start with Walter Block. Bottom line is, here you are trying to rip apart any theory of how a voluntary arrangement for roads could work, and in the meantime, cheering on the destruction of a successful, voluntary agricultural cooperative. Good job, useful idiot.
machaeroguy 6 months ago
@machaeroguy And there is proof that it doesn't work, in fact that same idea failed in medieval europe and several times in china. Also I would like to point out that the owner of Rawesome INTENTIONALLY avoided getting a license to start a non-existant controversy. Considering that people like you find any reason to cry about the government, makes it not a successful business, but intentional failure. also his "volunteering" is more like polite slavery ha ha
morakdais 6 months ago
@morakdais I don't why it took me so long to think of this, but there could obviously be an arrangement where the local gas station owners voluntarily contract to maintain all roads in an area. I hope I don't have to explain the implicit incentives for them to do something like this.
machaeroguy 6 months ago
@machaeroguy local gas stations don't make enough money to make it viable, as they get the smallest percentage of the products worth. Here is an easier way, find a better, cheaper and more durable material to make roads out of. Then we all ensure that our roads get upgraded by our local, state and federal governments, and that they do it properly for an acceptable cost.
morakdais 6 months ago
@KushinLos Why you shouldn't tax-evade? Because we live in communities. There are services that we have to share, which should be publicly funded. And quite frankly, the state of the community as a whole has a profound impact on the prosperity of it. Take the Scandinavian countries, for example. We might not have as many billionaires as you do, but we barely have any economic social division, a very broad middle class, everyone gets educated, everyone gets medical treatment - Prosperity is high.
xxhellspawnedxx 6 months ago
@morakdais As for product distribution, those people who were and are members of Rawesome Foods are really the only ones who can legitimately be said to determine if the channels were proper or not; not anyone else who is not involved with the distribution. If the members did not think that the channels they used were proper, they would have either made the management of Rawesome Foods change the channels, ended their membership or never would have become members in the first place.
KushinLos 6 months ago
@KushinLos Except proper channels is to let the government inspect your food, all businesses that sell food are required to do so, semantics aside, they were selling access to food and service to render the food. It is highly unlikely that the people were given the necessary information to understand exactly how food regulations work, as the club obviously didn't care. The most likely is that uninformed anti-government nuts wanted to cut taxes under the guise of "natural"
morakdais 6 months ago
Hey you never know those cows could be genetically engineered to produce crack in their milk. XD Yea it's really stupid what they did they should have left the farm people alone.
MistressArte 6 months ago
And that's the important part: this thing benefits the PEOPLE and corporations would lose profit, thats why they raided it.
NwZ2 6 months ago
Sales taxes collected from such an establishment would be the province of the state and local governments. Unless there's some trading tariff on milk >.>... Why would the federal authorities be involved with what you would define as a state/local tax dispute? Or would you posit that the federal government was conspiring with the state/local government?
hallavast 6 months ago
wow! i finally understand why people are pissed about this particular case.
i was thinking they were selling the milk.
yorkshirepuddiiing 6 months ago
Are you telling me there is food in American grocery stores that isin't made in China?
startreking2007 6 months ago
I can see your point somewhat on the ownership part of it.
However, one fatty steak, or even 50 fatty steaks, are not going to kill you on their own. 50 cigarettes will similarly not kill you. Drinking unpasteurized milk, just one or two glasses of it, can and HAS killed people due to contaminants that pasteurization would have killed off. This is why it's different.
Zaunstar 6 months ago 3
@Zaunstar It would still be the individual who has chosen to purchase and drink the milk in question who takes the risk. That is why it is the same.
KushinLos 6 months ago
@KushinLos It's the seller prohibited from selling. Can't sell anything that dangerous even if people did want it. Maybe you think they should be able to anyway, but that's a different argument.
Zaunstar 6 months ago
@Zaunstar Who determines what is dangerous? Don't know about where you are from, but here in Idaho raw milk isn't considered dangerous and if they started to do so I'd expect that it had more to do with other dairy farmers rather than whether or not raw milk can kill you. Contaminates in anything you take into your body can kill you after one use regardless what it is.
KushinLos 6 months ago
@KushinLos Science, evidence, statistics, etc. will determine what is dangerous. What a group of people considers dangerous isn't necessarily what is objectively dangerous.
Zaunstar 6 months ago
@Zaunstar I trust science a great deal, it not only made sure I could be conceived, it also ensured I didn't die of jaundice after I was born premature. I'm evidence of science improving lives as my birth brought great happiness to my parents and the family as a whole, not to mention the added benefit of my brother being born as well. I know enough about statistics work to know that one should be careful with what questions one should ask. They do contribute in determining what is dangerous.
KushinLos 6 months ago
@Zaunstar What I'm telling you is that despite how dangerous something might be, policy is determined by that group of people who benefit from it the most. Raw milk is one of those things that is desired by some people and that the people who seek to outlaw it, among other ways, benefit more then other people from it being outlawed/regulated the way they want it to be.
KushinLos 6 months ago
@Zaunstar I'm not saying things shouldn't be regulated, only that the people who use a product or service are the best in determining how much regulation is needed for them.
KushinLos 6 months ago
HES GOT DAIRY! SHOOT HIM! HE MIGHT GET US FAT!
ghostrj 6 months ago
@Proteanview who OR WHAT IS THE IRS. please answer ASAP!
firefox8192 6 months ago
it doesn't matter what the government has the legal authority to do or not do. they have the guns. they have the legislature. they have the backing of megacorps.
Urudrim 6 months ago
Fuck taxes...trade when you can with your local grower, baker, butcher, artist, craftsperson, handyman, doctor, vet, tutors, private transportation, etc. If you dont have anything to trade, use a 3 way system (almost like vouchers, but with goods and services redeemable thru the third party). Get educated where you can, acquire skills and talents when you can and you can go far in this system...especially when all hell finally (hope it doesnt, though) breaks loose.
skeletonmom 6 months ago 2
Well I agree with you but ...yes but ... it really is just a way around the regulations and thats a problem for health concerns when it will be the government thats expected to pick up the bill for emergence services and public welfare.
Public welfare just like if you had a cow in your half acre suburban lot.
I hate being the statist toadie, but as a economic progressive you gotta know you want safeguards youre gonna get a nannystate treating you as a lease only 'ownership' tenant.
Curas1 6 months ago
Ha ha, just glad I'm vegan. Goats and cows are for dummies.
ManNorthern 6 months ago
@ManNorthern Ha ha, just glad I'm an organic raw vegan. Cooked foods and pesticides are for dummies.
igotsissues 6 months ago
@igotsissues Ha ha, I'm a SUPER-MEGA VEGAN! I only eat air and water with ALL micro-organisms and their by-products filtered out. Food is for evil dummies!
pureevilfnord 6 months ago
Fresh cow piss?! Great!
Joking aside, Great video. Although, I am beginning to understand that the term "globalism" means anything anyone wants it to mean. Otherwise, what the hell does India and China have to do with some people in the US imposing retarded laws on other people in the US? Globalism this.. Globalism that... Does the term actually mean anything at all?
utubehayter 6 months ago
@utubehayter
Yeah I think it means that as most companies are subsidiaries of other companies in the corporate dominated world economy state policy is going to be bent to favor these multinational organizations because that keeps the government in the tax money cash crop as well.
The corporations lose money and control, so does the government to keep power directed as they like and maybe not to what the populace would like.
Curas1 6 months ago
@Curas1
Are you suggesting that government employees are acting on behalf of corporations? How dare you insinuate that our courageous public servants are pawns of the power elite, that the sacred institution of voting is a farce and democracy does not work?! This is an outrage. I will vote you into punishment soon enough.
utubehayter 6 months ago
@utubehayter
LMAO! :P
Curas1 6 months ago
@utubehayter I feel you. I think of globalization as a movement to get all of us to rely on international corporations and banks. instead of consuming or working for only local businesses, we buy from and work for multi nationals. outsourcing to india - globalization. exchanging locally = anti globalization. nothing is localized. no community is self reliant or independent. that's what i understand it to mean anyway.
igotsissues 6 months ago
@igotsissues
I do not understand the fetish of being "self-reliant". What is this? Germany of 1930s?... that people want autarky? If I can buy my food, my shoes and my water, then I am self-reliant regardless of what skin color the seller of these things has or what part of the planet he lives.
utubehayter 6 months ago
I'm glad you researched what happened and did another video on the subject. What happened to that store was robbery, plain and simple.
HomeGymFitness 6 months ago
There is no money in healthy consumers, they don't care about logic.
ZenMasterC 6 months ago
@ZenMasterC no, they don't care about the money, logically, it makes more sense to be healthy and alive than wealthy and dead...
Nate2203 6 months ago
the supreme court ruled that the interstate commerce clause allows that regulation of any activity as long as it can be shown to have some connection to commerce, somehow.
I'm not justifying it, I'm just saying that the Government has interpretted the constitution to grant itself unlimited powers.
Worldslargestipod 6 months ago
Well here's an ironic point of view...It is partly about the taxes, it is partly about the threat to market shares...You' re right...they don't want us finding a way around buying the garbage that big ag produces with the help of the USDA and the FDA. All of that is VERY good for big pharma...Making people sick the way it does.
But the people that are most behind this are the ones who print the money (worthless) and demand the taxes ( also worthless) . So what's it all about? DISTRACTION
ancestralblue 6 months ago
Same with people being arrested for growing food in their yards. Fucked up.
DiNatalli 6 months ago
My luck i would get tazzed cause i was packing fresh butter.
Atheistprimate 6 months ago
More taxes yay!
Tyr753 6 months ago
Or they could just over through the scum that extort them and live free... not like the serf slaves they are.
bryphi77 6 months ago
Members commission includes the payment of the "Stuff" they are "distributing". You see there are many-ways to avoid paying taxes, this "members only" organization is blatantly created as a tax shelter. The gov. is not stupid.
Ethioness 6 months ago
@Ethioness Have to agree there. I'm guessing if this were really an arrangement between two neighbors the government wouldn't bother to intervene but once you have larger organizations of this type, it makes sense.
megamarsvin 6 months ago
pimple!!!
Meskiagkasher 6 months ago
there's a Utube channel who was there when it happened... the footage was compelling...
Kensho
IChoseTheRedPill 6 months ago
This sounds like fascism, corporatism, crony capitalism where government protects big corporations from the little people (or socialism for the rich).
VexZeed 6 months ago
it's the same with capturing rainwater to drink. there are laws in the book that make rainwater illegal to hold and use. look it up i shit you not.
KlingonSpider 6 months ago
Excellent video
Kirbynessness 6 months ago
Can always count on Prot to bring up these issues! : )
ONESPECIES 6 months ago
first
TylerHmm 6 months ago