why isn't this lady getting on the case of their local mental health for letting this freak out there. why didn't the carpenters have gun if their neighbors had one take some freakin' responsibility. and would this child have been able to get the gun? if stored properly load it and aim it with any efficancy.
So, this women and her family were disarmed. A man broke into their house, and he didn't have a gun either. So being disarmed didn't prevent any crime here at all. The neighbor, however, was willing to defend his home, family, and life. Unfortunately, the law didn't allow him to take the firearm he used for that out of his home to defend his neighbor.
There aren't nearly enough police to be everywhere, thank god there aren't, but there are enough guns for everyone to defend themselves.
I wish I did not have to agree, but it's true... what hurts me is the fact that many of them don't even believe in the basic human right to self defense. Life is CHEAP to such people, and that makes them less than pathetic to me.
I asked a liberal about why they were more concerned with confessed killers & terrorists than actual innocents RR through the justice system and he didn't see the importance; also, if I was gangraped by poor people they'd defend them so that they have the "fair" advantage as someone rich. But if I shot either group as they tried, rich or poor, that I should be crucified for "taking the law into my own hands." He couldn't see why I found his sentiments upsetting, & why others were ticked at him.
why isn't this lady getting on the case of their local mental health for letting this freak out there. why didn't the carpenters have gun if their neighbors had one take some freakin' responsibility. and would this child have been able to get the gun? if stored properly load it and aim it with any efficancy.
wcresponder 8 months ago
@wcresponder If you google Mary Carpenter you will get answers to your questions.
NCGunGuy 8 months ago
protect your loved ones... a gun in every law abiding citizen's home... i love it
ccphilly1984 3 years ago
not only in the home but the right to carry every where !! the neighbor had a gun but did use it !!
sargon08 3 years ago
So, this women and her family were disarmed. A man broke into their house, and he didn't have a gun either. So being disarmed didn't prevent any crime here at all. The neighbor, however, was willing to defend his home, family, and life. Unfortunately, the law didn't allow him to take the firearm he used for that out of his home to defend his neighbor.
There aren't nearly enough police to be everywhere, thank god there aren't, but there are enough guns for everyone to defend themselves.
AreThereNoMoreNames 4 years ago
Could you refine your comment and communicate more clearly?
Many thanks.
NCGunGuy 4 years ago
Gun control advocates are traitorous scum. Limit, Restrict, Ban. They live to let the innocent die.
sigmasquadleader 4 years ago 9
I wish I did not have to agree, but it's true... what hurts me is the fact that many of them don't even believe in the basic human right to self defense. Life is CHEAP to such people, and that makes them less than pathetic to me.
cramsa 4 years ago
I asked a liberal about why they were more concerned with confessed killers & terrorists than actual innocents RR through the justice system and he didn't see the importance; also, if I was gangraped by poor people they'd defend them so that they have the "fair" advantage as someone rich. But if I shot either group as they tried, rich or poor, that I should be crucified for "taking the law into my own hands." He couldn't see why I found his sentiments upsetting, & why others were ticked at him.
JaneCochran 4 years ago
OK liberals and gun-law wackos, what part of this video do you NOT understand?
pshinspections 4 years ago