1. I really wish you would have gone into more detail about what the effects on the atom could do (in the molecule in which it is currently housed) caused by its remote formerly entangled counterpart.
2. What do you think the implications are (if you think there are any) for a pair of entangled atoms that now reside in a pair of people?
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
The teachings of quantum physics confirms that to attain peace,love,compassion and all the best qualities of human species, We need to truly share the earth , cooperate for our collective well being and do away with this politically corrupt and manipulated market mechanism where humanity are batteries charging the insatiable drive of a minority for ever more power and control.
Hate to burst your bubble but doing whatever to one of the entangled particles immediately breaks the supposed entanglement, so no, you don't manipulate one entangled particle and manipulate the other over distance.
@avrilinblood This is the one line in the video I wish I had clarified. Strictly speaking, one can still manipulate either of the entangled particles (unitary operations) and still maintain the entanglement and correlations. This is done all the time. It is only when measuring one of the particles that the entanglement is removed (traced out). If one believes in collapse, then measuring one of the particles instantaneously collapses the state of the other. Sorry for the confusion.
@QuantumPieBlog I suppose that's the problem. I don't believe in collapse. I didn't in college and I don't today. To me, the wrong interpretation of QM was made a long time ago, and now we're spending a lot of resources trying to create quantum entanglement info (i.e. comms and logic) devices, but I haven't ever seen any papers showing this to be valid. Where can I find an example of the exchange of bits??? Message Security - absolutely! Info transfer - erroneous assumptions! Reference please.
I assume arbitrary numbers of atoms across the universe can be entangled at the same time, right? So far, all the online YouTube lecture videos on this subject demostrate the concept with only 2 atoms or molecules.
Why would you ASSUME that arbitrary numbers can be entangles? There's a REASON why all the YouTube lectures deal with 2 particles (NOT MOLECULES) are used in the demos.
I assumed that arbitrary numbers of particles can be entangled - even though I'm sure the probability of seeing this happen goes down super-exponentially with the number - only as a general principle that the laws of physics have to be the same everywhere and regardless of the numbers of particles.
You said you could take the two molecules to opposite ends of the universe and anything you did to the one molecule, would instantly affect the other molecule. Wouldn't the components of that interaction then move faster than light?
@RBBlues The effect would be much faster than the speed of light. How can that be since nothing can travel faster than light? But you are thinking in an Einsteinian frame of reference. The effect is not "traveling" in the sense that matter or energy does. The quantum world cannot be analyzed in the same way our physical world can be. In the quantum world, something can be here, or there, or both places simultaneously. In the quantum world, an effect can occur instantly without delay.
@RBBlues There could certainly be some non-local (faster than light) influence happening. The trick is that there is no information transmitted. Strictly speaking what is forbidden by relativity is the communication of information faster than the speed of light. The kind of non-local correlations in entanglement cannot be used to send a message or information faster than light. This seems like a strange concept, but is well studied. Look up "Bell Inequalities" for more information.
"The trick is that there is no information transmitted." Your video directly contradicts this statement with several examples around the 1:30 mark. I don't normally criticize folks who put themselves out there doing science education for the lay public, but I have to say that this video sheds no light whatsoever on what quantum entanglement is, even in the places where it's not actively wrong.
Those were kings, not jacks :[
jarhead4life 5 days ago
Magician's sleight of hand at 2:27. It's so fast it looks like a flash. No chance of catching that without video.
joeyt5000 2 weeks ago
1. I really wish you would have gone into more detail about what the effects on the atom could do (in the molecule in which it is currently housed) caused by its remote formerly entangled counterpart.
2. What do you think the implications are (if you think there are any) for a pair of entangled atoms that now reside in a pair of people?
BrainHygiene 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video!
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
nickharvey7 2 months ago
How can we do that card trick? That was sweet.
MrMoneyHustler 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The teachings of quantum physics confirms that to attain peace,love,compassion and all the best qualities of human species, We need to truly share the earth , cooperate for our collective well being and do away with this politically corrupt and manipulated market mechanism where humanity are batteries charging the insatiable drive of a minority for ever more power and control.
arzoyan 7 months ago
the "transcribe is not ncessarily over the video it is sufficent also a part and printable"
giuseppe92205 7 months ago
Hate to burst your bubble but doing whatever to one of the entangled particles immediately breaks the supposed entanglement, so no, you don't manipulate one entangled particle and manipulate the other over distance.
avrilinblood 7 months ago
@avrilinblood This is the one line in the video I wish I had clarified. Strictly speaking, one can still manipulate either of the entangled particles (unitary operations) and still maintain the entanglement and correlations. This is done all the time. It is only when measuring one of the particles that the entanglement is removed (traced out). If one believes in collapse, then measuring one of the particles instantaneously collapses the state of the other. Sorry for the confusion.
QuantumPieBlog 7 months ago
@QuantumPieBlog there was this very recent news somewhere, where this university has managed to keep the particles entangled for one hour.
ab3339 6 months ago
@QuantumPieBlog I suppose that's the problem. I don't believe in collapse. I didn't in college and I don't today. To me, the wrong interpretation of QM was made a long time ago, and now we're spending a lot of resources trying to create quantum entanglement info (i.e. comms and logic) devices, but I haven't ever seen any papers showing this to be valid. Where can I find an example of the exchange of bits??? Message Security - absolutely! Info transfer - erroneous assumptions! Reference please.
RealInventor 4 months ago
please how could I get the transcript of then audio?
giuseppe92205 8 months ago
@giuseppe92205 I will try and transcribe the audio in the video. It will take some time though.
QuantumPieBlog 7 months ago
I assume arbitrary numbers of atoms across the universe can be entangled at the same time, right? So far, all the online YouTube lecture videos on this subject demostrate the concept with only 2 atoms or molecules.
mphello 8 months ago
@mphello
Why would you ASSUME that arbitrary numbers can be entangles? There's a REASON why all the YouTube lectures deal with 2 particles (NOT MOLECULES) are used in the demos.
frazzzer8888 4 months ago
@frazzzer8888
And what is that reason?
I assumed that arbitrary numbers of particles can be entangled - even though I'm sure the probability of seeing this happen goes down super-exponentially with the number - only as a general principle that the laws of physics have to be the same everywhere and regardless of the numbers of particles.
mphello 4 months ago
You said you could take the two molecules to opposite ends of the universe and anything you did to the one molecule, would instantly affect the other molecule. Wouldn't the components of that interaction then move faster than light?
RBBlues 10 months ago
@RBBlues The effect would be much faster than the speed of light. How can that be since nothing can travel faster than light? But you are thinking in an Einsteinian frame of reference. The effect is not "traveling" in the sense that matter or energy does. The quantum world cannot be analyzed in the same way our physical world can be. In the quantum world, something can be here, or there, or both places simultaneously. In the quantum world, an effect can occur instantly without delay.
ve7ha 9 months ago
@RBBlues There could certainly be some non-local (faster than light) influence happening. The trick is that there is no information transmitted. Strictly speaking what is forbidden by relativity is the communication of information faster than the speed of light. The kind of non-local correlations in entanglement cannot be used to send a message or information faster than light. This seems like a strange concept, but is well studied. Look up "Bell Inequalities" for more information.
QuantumPieBlog 7 months ago
@QuantumPieBlog
"The trick is that there is no information transmitted." Your video directly contradicts this statement with several examples around the 1:30 mark. I don't normally criticize folks who put themselves out there doing science education for the lay public, but I have to say that this video sheds no light whatsoever on what quantum entanglement is, even in the places where it's not actively wrong.
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
This vid rocks!!
morningmayan 1 year ago