I don't think our mind is able to see or imagine higher dimensions, like 4D or 7D (without counting the time), it's something we just can't accept because we haven't seen nothing similar before
Yes you can, the only thing is that you will only have 2/7 of the information that the the 7D structure can show you. This is the same thing with a 3D structure represent on 2D, you have 2/3 of the info. It is hard to explain, even more to understand but it is possible. p.s. Sorry for the spelling if there is any errors, I'm from Québec.
These are theories but it is possible to say that by logical interraction between objects that the fourth dimension will be time, so in the fourth dimension, volume change in every single time, the "carpe diem". By searching you could learn a lot of interressing facts about the dimensions. In bref, it has been settle that there are 11 dimension because of supergravity theory. This theory advance that each dimension pull another one in the universe, if there was more than...
...11 dimensions, the attraction force will be so great that it will tear appart dimensions, and the universe will disapear because each dimension will implode. Damn I love Einstein!
actually, i must be picky this time about the description, the description says thats what it would look like, i will be picky, if we were a 7d object, we would perceive this differently, than now, because its a 3d projection of a 7d object
I hate when a good theoretical hyperdimensional geometry conversation gets derailed when someone mentions the word time. It's analogous, but for the sake of this topic, completely misses the point. We are talking about space, space, space, and nothing but space! The context is geometric theory, rather than physical reality.
I don't think our mind is able to see or imagine higher dimensions, like 4D or 7D (without counting the time), it's something we just can't accept because we haven't seen nothing similar before
Thinnestmeteor 8 months ago
@Thinnestmeteor i agree
NightNike11 1 month ago
@Markt666
Yes you can, the only thing is that you will only have 2/7 of the information that the the 7D structure can show you. This is the same thing with a 3D structure represent on 2D, you have 2/3 of the info. It is hard to explain, even more to understand but it is possible. p.s. Sorry for the spelling if there is any errors, I'm from Québec.
hdugre 11 months ago
@hdugre but when we only can see 3 dimensions. What is the the evidence for the existence of a fourth or seventh dimension?
Michivonundzulaut 8 months ago
@Michivonundzulaut
These are theories but it is possible to say that by logical interraction between objects that the fourth dimension will be time, so in the fourth dimension, volume change in every single time, the "carpe diem". By searching you could learn a lot of interressing facts about the dimensions. In bref, it has been settle that there are 11 dimension because of supergravity theory. This theory advance that each dimension pull another one in the universe, if there was more than...
hdugre 8 months ago
@Michivonundzulaut
...11 dimensions, the attraction force will be so great that it will tear appart dimensions, and the universe will disapear because each dimension will implode. Damn I love Einstein!
hdugre 8 months ago
You simply cant explain 7D on a 2D surface...
Markt666 11 months ago
Amazing !!!
edwinp26 1 year ago
actually, i must be picky this time about the description, the description says thats what it would look like, i will be picky, if we were a 7d object, we would perceive this differently, than now, because its a 3d projection of a 7d object
Kounteron 2 years ago
@Kounteron
2D Projected.
I must be picky too :D
YouCantClickMyName 2 years ago
@YouCantClickMyName would-be 3d projection on a 2d flat surface, must be picky also :D, but it kinda makes it 2d anyways
Kounteron 2 years ago
I hate when a good theoretical hyperdimensional geometry conversation gets derailed when someone mentions the word time. It's analogous, but for the sake of this topic, completely misses the point. We are talking about space, space, space, and nothing but space! The context is geometric theory, rather than physical reality.
FluffyBunniesOnFire 2 years ago 10
Exactly how many eyes do you need to look at it in a good way?
Barnix005 2 years ago
@Barnix005
I guess you need 6 eyes to see the deph of 7 dimensions. We need two for 3D.
sry for bad english
YouCantClickMyName 2 years ago
q mierda tienen
eso no esplica nada
alvarorc14 2 years ago
it not true 4d means time
mastercheeok 2 years ago
do you have proof
xam714 2 years ago
the forth dimention is time that is
mastercheeok 2 years ago
proof plz
xam714 2 years ago
3 dimentions, we can see, the rest is i sub-atomic level.
go and find out yourself
mastercheeok 2 years ago
not all of us own a sub-atomic shrink rey
dfer159632 2 years ago
how the hell can you even say that that would be like asking someone"so if there is a second dimension, prove it"
dfer159632 2 years ago
time would be misinterpereted(sorry for the misspelling)as time but time as an actual thing is an illusion
dfer159632 2 years ago
do you have proof that its not
dfer159632 2 years ago
This is insane,, not many minght get it but for those who do,,, whoa
jassassa33 3 years ago