Added: 4 years ago
From: theMediaFork
Views: 10,104
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I am NOT a fan of Bill O'Reilly, but I appreciate that he will occasionally say something reasonable about politicians like Clinton

  • No response from "The media fork" I guess that means i win.

  • no response to from "eagesfanica" i guess that means i win.

    (just ranting in a reply while ignoring the argument that previously handed your ass to you is not a claim to victory)

    FAIL

  • notified of the difference? He must have thought it was weird when he was recieving letters in the mail about voting in the republican primaries huh? duh. where are they coming from i'm an independent.

  • why are you sitting on this story instead of breaking it? quick! bust this dispute wide open and post your evidence that oreilly voted in any republican primaries! go go g---oh? you pulled that out of your ass?...oh... =(

    FAIL again then

  • the story was broken. You are just too much of a fan of his to know it.

    Good luck helping Palin in 2012, you know that is who you voted for.

  • LIAR. no story was broken. if it were, you would have cited it instead of giving up and running away with a ridiculous ad hominem that relates to nothing but your own intellectual bigotry and how you caricature everyone you disagree with (or in this case, everyone who embarrasses your non-factual rants with logic and reality).

    thanks for the theater.

    EPIC FAIL

  • Bill O'Reilly is a registered independent.

  • Dear Sas

    "Bill O'Reilly is a registered independent."

    Well, that is just ONE of the things O'Reilly is!! LMAO! This guy is such an empty sack of wind! If he says "Good day" you better look outside and check. He appears to be a blow-hard, a bully, and a butt-licker of his boss Murdock.

    Peace

    Peace

  • this comment was an empty sack of wind.

    whiny and lacking any substance.

    Peace

    Peace

    FAIL

  • Not in 2000 he was not. And he only changed it after washington Post reported it.

    And then said he had no idea.

  • now THERE'S a smart correction.

    "stating a fact eh? oh ya!? not 9 years ago!"

    and he "only" corrected his registration to reflect what he wanted it to after he was notified of the difference?? you mean he's not psychic? Eaglesfaninca, you should be a reporter with scoops like this!

  • Notified of the difference? Do you mean caught? That would be the term I use.

    Besides did you watch the show when he said Sarah palin can be "Tutored"

    I guess you believe Bill O'reilly is "independent" and every one else is a part of the liberal media bias.

    Sorry if I offended you by attacking your hero

  • You "guess" some pretty stupid things based on zero evidence, but thats not surprising as you didnt even argue your case. "caught"? with what motive?

    You give yourself far too much credit to think your baseless and flawed attacks could fall under "offensive" (to ones intelligence, maybe, but personally? no). You also reveal the basis of your emotional attack being just that; lacking in rationality, or you wouldnt think in terms of "offense". what you or O'Reilly claim is either true or untrue.

  • He admitted it on his radio show. I heard the clip. He said he "had no idea" so he changed it. He said he remembered he checked republican because there was noi check box for indepenednt. When in fact there was a box for "I don't want to be affiliated with any party".

    So he lied about that.

    Someone that passionate about government and politics, that just accidently checked and republican box.

    Right wing biased show do very well. Which is why he is successfull. Limbaugh, beck etc.

  • so busy guzzling the haterade brand of brainwash kool-aid are you that you actually think "he checked a box on a piece of paper! that is incontrovertible proof against all other evidence that he is a secret republican!" is actually a devastating argument. in fact it is pathetic and you are fooling no one besides maybe yourself. good luck with that.

  • This is the one i was talking about remember this?????

    You should probably delete your stupid comments.

  • It's hard to debate an intellect so large that doesnt use punctuation where required and overuses when not, but pretending I'm psychic won't help you prove any points. Nothing was said on this comment thread that was stupid, inaccurate, or contradicted by anything except the ravings of an obsessed lunatic who, oddly, has your same youtube screen name.

    hmm... fishy.

  • Yeah wow the same youtube screen name as mine. Hmmm. Maybe it is because it is the same account and they are all my comments. Dumbass. Maybe you are too stupid to talk to. How hard was that to figure out.

    Read the comments below. I had said that a story was put out that o'reilly was a regeistered republican and you didn't believe it.

    You really are the dummest person on here? Are you a creationist? It must be hard to get owned when you forget it ever happening.

  • Your hilarious sarcasm detection fail puts you at 11.

    Cite your sources with quotes when you make a claim. and you wont embarrass yourself like this 12th failure on O'Reilly's registration. No comment was made about not believing a his registration (you can even find a picture of the form online). the denial was about your claims that this meant anything.

    You really are the dummest [sic] person on here? Are you a creationist? It must be hard to get owned when you forget it ever happening.

  • 1. You said Clinton deserved 8 years of blame for 9/11. That is based on OPINION and only on opinion as 9/11 did not happen on his watch. While Osama did survive the Clinton administration he did not successfully pull of 9/11 until AFTER Clinton was out of office.

    2. It is a FACT that 9/11 happened under Bush. It is a FACT that Bush failed to get him either.

    3. My point was you can plagarize someone for their opinion, not for things based on fact.

  • 1. History fail. Bin Laden planned the 9/11 attacks during Clintons term, attacked the US, declared war, etc. Clinton failed to stop the plot and so did Bush.

    2. noting the time each president failed to stop an enemy is not opinion.

    3. and your point fails since you cited the fact that Bush did not stop Bin Laden in his 8 months of office, while ignoring the fact that Clinton did not stop Bin Laden in 8 years of office.

    you are doing a terrible job of weaseling out of your idiotic claim.

  • 4. O'Reilly tried to DENY he knew anything about being registered as a republican. He must have thought it was odd getting mail about voting in the primaries huh? Dumbass.

    Alright I am done with you. I think anyone who can read can obviously tell you have been owned.

    Have a nice life. Learn to stop drinking the kool aid.

  • 4. What evidence do you have that O'R voted in any primary or received any mail about it? & why didn't you bring this up earlier as it is the ONLY evidence of a lie or anything shady taking place via this pathetic scandal. i suspect you completely made that up, but if not, by all means: show your cards and you'll have a point.

    I know anyone who can read can obviously tell you have been owned because you don't even respond to 9 out of 11 corrections.

    Learn to stop drinking the kool aid.

  • Correction: I see now that you DID bring this up 4 months ago in the comments, and likewise failed to cite a source or lend even a shred of credibility to your claim. Typical...

  • It says that in the daily news article. apparently you haven't ever read it. What you said is an exact copy of wikipedia too, and you know it.

  • Just like you could have made up the fact that the newspaper reported that he was a republican.  Go look it up. Except im not a complete douschebag asking for an apology for some idiot halfway across the world.

  • "He then changed his registration to become unaffiliated with a party." That was from wikipedia.

  • Apparently you dont have a thorough understanding of the english language. the word "is" is a verb that is used in the present tense. Presently it is 2008, not 2000. In 2008, he is a registered independent.

  • Bill O'Reilly is a registered independent.

  • Bill orielly really does tell it how it is and really isn't very biased towards any side....The only reason you think so is because liberal media like MSNBC makes you think he this big right wing devil. If you actually listen to the things he says most of the time he is just trying to get the truth out.

  • @wharfrat89 I could find you many many examples of O'reilly being biased and misleading his audience. He is however the most honest and up front person on fox in my opinion.

  • Clinton never said he loathed the military

  • john135246, Bill's a registered Independent. Listen to what he says on the radio and on television, he has no political agenda. It's a breath of fresh air, really. Now, the reason Fox News gets such high ratings is because they successfully keep the news COMMENTATORS and REPORTERS separate. Most of the Fox commentators do lean to the right, but it ends there. When it comes to reporting, there isn't a slant.

  • Bull Shit. They stayed away from Libby, Craig, and Foley.

    ABC< NBC< CBS all went after Clinton over his affair with lewinsky which has nothing to do with anything.

  • no they didnt. they went after his lying about.

    perjury has a lot to do with everything when you're the president of the united states.

    get in the game.

  • Well Bush did not even go under oath during the 911 commission.

    Clinton cheated on his wife. The economy was great, we were seeing surpluses. But he have to find some reason to hate the democrat, so they got their wish.

  • changing the subject isn't a response and you're not fooling anyone into thinking you've responded to anything when you haven't. terrible try. original rebut remains intact.

    enjoy the sidelines.

  • That is right scotty, the reason catholics and other religioous groups oppose Hiallaryis because of her PRO ABORTION beliefs not to mention the poor moral standards of the Clinton's.

  • 9 Month Abortion proof they have tried it

  • POOR Bill POOR little Mother F KER

  • y would he say anythign bad about the right? he's a conservative.

    u obviously a liberal, so ur gonna be saying shit about the right...

  • Bill is fair and balanced but i would hardly say his comments were defending Hillary. Bill just tells it like it is even though it bothers the Clintonians to hear the truth about the Clintons horrible dealings. Bill, unlike the Clinton supporters does not and will not spin to defend anybody. Least of all the Clinton's. Good job Bill!

  • Bill tells is how he sees it. His monster ego gets in the way all of the time, but he's on the ball here!

    I actually like him though, he speaks his mind.

  • He never answers the questions. He gives a totally different response.

  • ass kisser

  • You know, blank you.

  • He's not defending Hillary, for God's sake!

  • O'Rielly is one of the only people out there who is fair and balanced. If you hear the whole piece and not just parts, you will realize that he does not support Clinton or Kerry anymore than he does Edwards. He is against the 527 groups including the ones that attack Pres. Bush.

  • You guys have such a funny country. O´reilly? Come on!

  • What the FUCK!?!?! Is that really Bill O'reilly? I had heard that he wasn't as big an ultra-right douche as he seems but i never believed in it. I couldn't believe the whole right wing koolaid reference, damn kudos to bill (for once) for acting right (no pun intended).

  • Hey O'Reilly gave his opinion and he's pretty centered. He is "dealing with what's in front of him" at the moment. That's pretty sensible to me.

  • @prrolg centered? O'reilly is about as far to the right as you can get

  • @DonaldBumsfeld DonaldBumsfeld? You're just a clown. so long

  • Don't get your knickers in a twist.

    I'm just letting you know your judgment is wrong :-)

  • @DonaldBumsfeld Knickers? Fuck off clown

  • @prrolg

    don't cry :-)

  • @DonaldBumsfeld Good pussy's comeback you masterbating loser. LOL

  • @DonaldBumsfeld You are so wrong. Call up Rush Limbaugh one day, ask him what he thinks about Bill O, and listen to him rant about how far to the left he is. Bill might not be centered exactly, but he is not very far to the right at all.

  • @CaptainPriceLives O'Reilly works for Fox!

    They don't employ people unless they are right wing.

    He has to appear to consider all points of view so he seems unbiased and then he holds more weight on the important issues that need to be hammered home.

  • @DonaldBumsfeld You are so misguided. Look at this video for example. He is against people having assault rifles and the death penalty, he wants green energy, and supports civil unions for gays. OMG so right wing!

    Fox also has hosts Bob Beckel and Alan Colmes, two prominent liberals. Shepherd Smith and Chris Wallace - two centrist hosts they employ.

    Certainly they are more right than left, but to say they only employ right wingers is a flat out lie. Half of Bill's TV staff is Democratic.

  • o'reilly is ust a showman, don't take him seriously

  • that second caller is such a pussy. "No, no, i don't think you're republican" hahaha

  • I'd just like to say that it's funny that the Republicans use one thing to attack the democrats, but when the democrats use millions of things to criticise the republicans (which are worse), they say it doesn't matter.

    Oh, and well said Bill O'Reily.

  • I'm voting for Hillary! =)

  • Hillary Clinton for president !!!

  • Bill O'really?

  • what did they do to the real oreily

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more