Added: 2 years ago
From: SperoPatria
Views: 10,182
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (505)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • At 0:10 how come the picture of the white people was drawn like that how come they didn't look like White people really look? Some of them dress like skin heads and some have that Grunge look others have tattoos and ear rings all over their bodies this picture is a bullshit drawing of White people in the world today. You're just as radical as the picture of the black and brown people in this drawing. Oh and yes, I did keep pushing repeat at 1:34

  • They might hesitate because "There is no such thing as a Japanese people." doesn't make grammatical sense.

  • You can take out Romans and Normans, they didnt not migrate and settle, they were rulers which is totally different.

  • All the past invasions up to now were violent minorities taking over the running of our Nation. A couple of decades ago, 80% of the British bloodline had been here practically since the last ice age. Yes, 80% of us are actually Welsh!

  • There is such a thing as English people, as there is with Scottish and Irish. It is mainly the islamics that are evil and need to leave the UK.

  • "Britain was created as a nation, around 1,000 years ago" = Wrong.

  • Firstly you cannot logically disagree that Nation does not exists, for example things such as the government, country, society are merely aggregations for a collection of individuals, therefore concepts (which don't exist because they are thoughts.) like Nation cannot have any moral standing and therefore are arbitrary.

  • all whites are filth. asians are taking over street by street, town by town. so keep arguing amongst yourselves...more of us are arriving eveyday lol

    britainistan 2050

  • /watch?v=GUZ5gGO0_Pw

  • @JapManc interestingly the Chinese COmmunist party considers the BNP and Australia First Party to be threats to Chinese business investments there. but yet in america the KKK is not considered a threat to Chinese investments in USA, its because right wing has even less power in america. here black people and asian people wear the american flag as their undewear

  • DEPORT THEM TO THERE ORIGIN VOTE BNP

  • The BNP are the hypocrites. Britain stole lots of countries and made population there and they think that's ok. But it's not ok for immigrants to come Britain. That is a DAMN right hypocrite.

  • @LOhaha94 your talking about war and invasion right?

    as far as im aware the countries we once took over who wanted indipendance from us were returned upon request

    the Uk hasent invaded and taken control over a country in a very long time

    sure we inviaded iraq but the goal was never to take thier country from them

    british people never had a problem with immigration until it became clear to us how many problems mass immigration has caused

    and what pissed us off was out govement did nothing 

  • @LOhaha94 I suggest not bringing in historical events from centuries ago into a modern day argument.

  • @lolatmyaccounts still is relevent though because the past reflects the future. 

  • @JapManc No you did not worked in Poland, why you lie? Fucking wanker. You call us racist cuz we don't want to look like GB, France or Germany now with burning neighborhoods and welfare-like state for dangerous criminals. FUCK YOU! Look at Japan, historical revisionism, laws against immigrants etc. Who's racist.

  • Without hate you cannot have love,they are different sides of the same coin.

  • Nationalism is the scourge of humanity. All it's brings is hate and dislike of people who are allegedly different from you. Country doesn't exist in objective reality, if you believe in the concept of country you might as well believe in the tooth fairy. The government uses Nationalism as a religion so you can blindly love your Country even if they indulge in immoral activities. It makes me laugh when I see people get sexually aroused over songs, flags and other national junk.

  • @darrouken Chauvinism brings hate and dislike not nationalism. Learn and do not confuse the two.

  • @0masakra0 I can see where you're coming from... Chauvinism is behind Nationalism and many other problems in this world.

  • @darrouken Still you confuse the two. Nationalism is not equal to chauvinism nor is chauvinism equal to nationalism. Learn the difference. I'm a nationalist and I'm not a chauvinistic person.

  • @0masakra0 I read up on Chauvinism on Wikipedia, and you are right they're not connected but many Nationalists are chauvinists especially the politicians. I respect the fact that you're a Nationalist and not a Chauvinist but I still stand by my point made in the comment you first replied to that Nationalism is a concept which doesn't exist in objective reality like all concepts and in this fabricated world of ideals (The Matrix) came Nationalism which caused and causes much pain and suffering.

  • @darrouken Stalin, Lenin, and Mao, would be proud of Marxist scum like you. Keep on preaching comrade. Your EUSSR is coming down . :)

  • @12Zenman Haha, you're assumption is incorrect, I resent being called a communist and put into the paradigm of left and right propaganda.

  • @darrouken Every side has their own flaws that become more expressive as time goes on. The days of the left are counted though. You think that Stalin, Lenin, and Mao didn't preach multiculturalism?

    What is funny about "anti fascist" like you is that you will go on and on about the how bad nationalist are, etc. Yet funny how you do't put "anti communist." Who killed more people? Hitler or Stalin? Hm?

  • @12Zenman Of course communists didn't want multiculturalism because that distracts from the main goal that the subjects should worship the state under one culture. I appreciate your critique of my list, and you're right I should add communism and I will. To be honest I spent less than 5mins on that list so it's not entirely accurate of my beliefs. :-P

  • @darrouken Actually they did advocate multiculturalism. The idea that different groups of people from different nations living together as a "Soviet" people was central idea. It is true that it was worship of "state" but it was a Union of different groups of people working with common interest (commune).

    I can't post links for evidence. Google "Stalin Propaganda" and then click on images. The forth picture with Stalin in the middle raising his arm and sea of different "diverse" people together.

  • @darrouken On your page you post there is no such thing as nation. That is exactly what the EU and SU both argued (and the best way to achieve it was to dissolve national sovereignty and put diverse cultures under one superstate. Thus you have a far left regime called the "European Union (even have the same last word...very original). So where is the left talking about this? Or is it your wet dream come true?

  • @12Zenman What I meant by there's no nation is that it doesn't exist in objective reality, it is a subjective concept. I'm not preaching left propaganda it's just logic. What exactly is the point you're getting across, sir?

  • @darrouken Every side has their own view. Nations form on the basis of a similar cultural, ethnic (racial), origin. If that is not "objective" then I don't know what is. Nations simply don't fall from the sky, are randomly put into place, and boundaries are drawn just because someone felt it. Nations reflect the historical period of the particular time. Just because nations change doesn't mean they are artificial. I used to believe what you did by obviously my mind changed.

  • @darrouken Nations share a common idea and history that forms the basis of the reality for those particular people. When a nation has a civil war for example their becomes a divergence of thought reflected by the people within that nation. Basically a nation is a living organism which we are the cells within it. Or at least that is my recent view.

  • @12Zenman No offence but I asked you before what is the point you're getting across? Are you trying to disagree that Nations do not exist and are concepts in the mind and therefore there is no need to get worked up over them? Are you a Nationalist?

  • @darrouken Yes. I'm disagreeing that nations are just arbitrary concepts but rather reflect very real ideas (etc) from a common group of people. I guess, if you want to label.

  • no,a person born in america would be american,they have an american passport regardless of their ancestry.ethnic identity,or race, and nationality are not the same thing.its not that ethnic identity doesnt exist, im just saying it cant be defined in the same terms as nationality. race is a broad genetically defined category of people like black,caucasian,asian and oriental,nationality is the nation you are from. im english too- i was born here. if my parents were from france i wouldnt be french

  • there is no japanese race, just as there is no english or american race.

    nationality and race are seperate, nationality is defined by where you are born, not where you are descended from, so by definition the english people are the people living in england, in the same way the japanese people are the people livin in japan. if a british person had a child in japan and raised it there the child would be japanese regardless of race

  • @silas98ify Stop talking through your arse. People have ethnic identities. So someone born in America must be a native American Indian (using your logic), even though the ethnic differences would tell you otherwise. Your civic mentality says that anyone can adopt an identity regardless of race, creed or colour - which makes a mockery of what marks out someone's identity, i.e. its uniqueness. I'm ethnically English, and whose ancestry is northern European, i.e. Germanic. Don't like it? Too bad!

  • @silas98ify the child wouldnt be ethnically japanese though. Much the same that any non white born in Britain cannot be ethnically British because for this you have to be white. Its not a popular pc opinion but its true nevertheless

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @JapManc

    well said. Dont worry, empty vessels tend to make a lot of noise. Your words are wonderful

  • @ SperoPatria Your "question" isn't a question. Your "answer" is self-contradictory. Japanese and British are not different species, they are the same species, i.e. Homo sapiens. Thus your "colonizing" point is moot. Your definition of indigenous is disingenuous at best, and frankly laughable. You are cherry-picking facts that suit your self-serving delusions, and missing the larger picture. The UK is better and stronger for having embraced new people, words, ideas, and practices.

  • people of britain look at these videos of the BNP more and more people are liking them more and more people are watching tem and more and more are chanting on to VOTE THE BNP INTO POWER this is not just a party but an army of patriots the BNP will have more and more voters everyday at this rate VOTE BNP AND PUT THE GREAT BACK INTO BRITAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @JapManc Ok i believe that Japan is for Japanese and England for English,so why such hypocrisy by non-Whites?

  • @JapManc Why dont you let fucking piece of shit Japan being flooded with millions of muslims and blacks.

  • The Bigot Nazi Party will always be racist the BNP is no good scum, white working class racist, homophobic, islamaphobic scum, the BNP is wrong all members will be defeated by Karma.

  • the fucking irony!!!!!! before the bnp was taken to court and forced to accept coloured members, this jap wouldn't be allowed to join the bnp not that the coloured membership of the bnp amount to much. 1 can think of and he hates muslims not loves the bnp.

  • sic of imagrant slowy takeing over blythe livin in bushes and steeling our jobs

  • man that japanese chick was hot

  • God BNP and God bless the UK! a supporter from America.

  • MMMMHMMM THAT JAPANESE BITCH IS GONNA GET IT ! Vote bnp ;)

  • @oopticom under the BNP you would be a race-traitor for shagging a Jap bird.you could only shag fat ugly British women in fleese's and over stretched leggings.

  • Britain wasn't created as a nation 1,000 years ago, The act of union came about in 1707 and thus the nation of Britain (or Great Britain) was created. Before that, the geographic region of England was made up of three two three major nations (England and Wales, which unified properly under the Laws in Wales Acts 1535–1542). Roughly 1,000 years ago, Britain was vastly divided. You had the Kingdom of England, the different kingdoms nominally under the control of Gruffudd ap Llywelyn and heirs.

  • @Wodanaz And Scotland was even more divided. The Gaelic,Brythonic and Anglic parts were hardly united, hence you had areas owned by the king of the Isles and the king of Norway. The idea of an indigenous pretty group is, even with your loose definition, quite absurd, especially as it would mean that an indigenous group has only existed since the 1700s...

  • Europe wanted to have the world, steal other peoples land and valuables. Well, Europe and the Europeans in the US are experiencing payback time...and its white people making it possible. I think there you have the problem. the white people are divided in 2 camps...the left side made it all possible but the right side were to busy making money and forgot to stop the left side. Now, we whites, are complaining. But now its too late.

  • With the regard to the question about there not being a British people. There WAS a British people when Napoleon tried to conquer us. Then there was another British people when the Germans went to war with us twice. So i hope there is another war because then I'll be telling the government to FUCK OFF.

  • yes the bnp tell the truth" all muslims are evil terrorists, the holocaust never happened, anyone from the middle east is a paki and that black men are monkeys"some quotes from the "beloved" british nazi party . you say that we all came from celts, romans, germans, scandinavians, but you fail to recognise where they came from. you say that you turn hate into righteous anger...ANGER AND HATE ARE THE SAME!!!! you have very little grasp of distance and of time, romans weren't here when vikings were

  • @me6664 Thats what the Illuminati controlled news channels want you to believe. You are being hypnotized daily to accept this NWO that is happening. But think outside the box, have you ever read a party you've judged manifesto? Have you ever talked to a member? Do you really believe other things as well - like the war in Afghanistan being just? Immigration elevels? 9/11 being done by terrorrist from the middle east? You are just a pawn for the corrupt leaders, you need to think past the lies.

  • @JapManc ...thanks?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • ridiculous. The red and grey squirrel analogy doesn't work. Pakistanis aren't neanderthals, they are humans. The same as us.

  • If we could teach Racists that there are good and bad people in every group then they may be able to break the bonds that keep them ignorant.

    .....

    Until that day comes, racists will continue to be hateful, ignorant, delusional sub-humans

  • @MACKATTACK1970 Every racist knows that. It's just that there are more bad people in some groups than in others.

  • Hay BNP supporters, how's that social awkwardness and/or physical disability treating you?

    "herp, but I'm important because I'm british and get to shout at muslims instead of having sex for another year thanks to pionering new brain aneurysm and clubbed foot treatments!"

    Nobody's interested in race mixing. The only reason BNPers are convinced is because they see girls go for foreign guys over them all the time. And guess what, ITS BECAUSE YOU'RE A CUNT :)

    signed: English caucasian

  • Damn that japanese girl is HOT!!!!

  • smash the bnp

  • There is no ''British'' ethnic group, imbeciles. The Japanese are comparable to the English, who are an ethnic group. Britain is merely a unity of different ethnic groups. How stupid can you be?

  • @JapManc i,m one of the idiots that want to live in your country. nice food, beautiful women no religious nutters. hope you,ve not lost any friends or family over the last few weeks.  over there.

  • @JapManc I love this comment. Well said mate. You gave us a great view from a visitor. Dom arigato

  • What is it with the BNP and other facists? Why are they always so hell bent on placing everyone in boxes and labelling people? I am British, and veyr proud, and not a 'lefty' 'libroid' 'uaf' or whatever box you try and put me in. I also however do not want to become a racist and joing your party. Especially since I just found out you've been giving money to the IRA!!! Now's who's Britishness is in question? Fucking hypocrites. Go on block me now like you do. Freedom of speech my arse!!

  • @fadmucker08 yes im not a lefty or right winger but whats going on in britain needs adressed there is a video of the 1rst british muslim mp before a large audience proclaiming a muslim prime minester by 2030 before a big hall of muslims what does happen if this country becomes an islamic stae there wiil be no more left or right punk rap or anything that is not islamic do you want that islam is the real nazi this is not a war of colour but for freedom the bnp are teddy bears too islamic nazi

  • @GAREMPOTS our leaders wouldnt let that happen

  • @fadmucker08 They are not focused on placing everyone in 'boxes' because you clearly don't have too.. These so called Muslims cannot assimilate into our society, they live segregated from everyone else, more move in one at a time until eventually (as more INDIGENOUS people move out) the entire area is taken over by Muslims. This will keep happening until eventually we are the minority. Btw, Brown/Blair/Cameron have been giving Pakistan (the very same country harbouring Bin Laden) millions of £s.

  • I am one of your 'antis' and have never said 'there is no such thing as the British people', nor has anyone I know in any anti-racist organisation. The key word here is 'indigenous'. I do not believe there is an indigenous British people, or an indigenous Japanese people. If you wish to understand our position then type 'There is no such thing as an 'indigenous' Briton' and read james Mackay's article. If you do not, then you are entitled to your opinion, but you are wrong.

  • Why do BNP supporters feel the need to associate themselves with the Germans, Dutch and Scandinavians?

    Germany has a totally distinct culture from the U.K. British people do not wear lederhosen. British people do not eat the same traditional foods as Germans.

    Same with Scandivians.... they are different cultures. Desperately trying to affiliate yourselves with other Europeans kind of makes you look stupid.

  • @RapidEyesCream German people do not eat fish and chips or Yorkshire puddings. Just shut up with all this bullshit.

  • great video

  • Great. Excellent. Splicing half-baked BNP propaganda with Japanese wanking fetish porn. That'll show 'em. Vote BNP!

    By the way, the Japanese are basically Han Chinese invaders who pushed the native Ainu minority upwards and intermarried with the rest - A bit like the Saxons with the Celts. Whatever this stuff has got to do with voting for a bunch of old school lunatics and 'hail Britannia' loyalists led by a fat cyclops is beyond me.

  • @ShezaDeLondres Excuse my French but that is a fucking cracking response. Well said.

  • there is no such thing as a British person, Britain is a political union, there are ethinic English, Welsh, Scots and Irish but not British

    As for Japan you probably should have picked Chinese, the Japs are fairly homogeneus not have experenced much immigration over the milleniea unlike China that has seen waves of invasions just like Britain

  • problem, whos scientific definition? also, northern european celts are decendants of aryans who split into 3 from modern day iran. they immigrated to central asia, north europe and also remained in middle east. so the northern europeans then become non-idigenous before they immigrate to britain. i think its just best to share the world since it becomes for of a philosophical debate hinging on language and terminology than actual empirical facts. also BNP as a party is a farce, a business. peace

  • How can anyone be immigrants anyway. Immigrants are people who come into a political defined country - since a politically united country didn't exist in the 5th century how are they immigrants? Since for most of Britain's history people were tribal, any people that did come would have to fit into those tribes. The term nation had a completely different meaning in say Alfred the Great's time (collection of tribes), no modern ideas of nations existed.

  • @MickeyCool30 Immigration isn't defined by whether the nation in question is politically structured. I'm sure it says different on wikipedia etc. but use your brain and think outside the box. Call it what you will and define it how you like emigration/immigration existed as long as man existed.

  • Yes, great video, but one has to question the context of history. Was there really mass immigrantion of Vikings, Celts, Anglo-Saxons etc or did the natives simply change allegiances and adopted language and culture? Were all Britons Celts or Celtic speaking? To me the Celts simply spoke a Celtic language not a race/ethnic group (mosts so called Celts fought each other). Were the Vikings one race or lots of individual groups? To me Northern Europeans have shared culture for thousands of years.

  • I'd like to thank the BNP for rekindling my interest in voting. I was never that enthusiastic about voting, untill I realised we had a BNP candidate in our area, once I relised that, I made sure I went out and voted AGAINST him, he didn't win the election, and I'm PROUD to have helped defeat him. As long as the BNP field candidates here, I'll make the effort to vote and help keep them out.

  • there were original britons who established stone hanege in prehistoric days. then received celtics from the continent, then received roman soldiers from the empire, then received angles, judes, and saxsons from mainly garmany, then recived noldic vikings such as danes and swedish, then received norman conqueest from continental france. do you need more?

  • Why does the guy who uploaded this vid love Japanese porn vids?

    You are a fake nationalist. you should rub your dick to the british porn.

  • Great video, Anglo-Saxon scum get out of our country! Britain only for the Celts.

  • Brilliant video...telling it like it is!

  • @ashleelmb Check out on youtube--(Europe 2029)

  • The BNP are a party of nobodies, never get any real power in the UK just a few token seats in Europe from which they can do nothing.

  • Comment removed

  • @jjr89avfc "next, I'm going to whack you off once....does it feel good? I'll hit you in the face too" was as close as I could understand but the sound isn't clear

  • She said in Japan men have tiny dicks, but with English men we do this ......... see demo! LOL

  • the worlds fucked.

  • ITS TIME FOR A NEW HITLER

  • @Auschwitz2012 ITS TIME FOR A NEW STALIN

  • im not really interested in who did what to someone else in the past, we are not children, for all those that say BNP are all Rascists is like saying all Muslims are terrorists... all most of us want is to be left alone to be who we are to appreciate our own culture, the minorities ruin it-those who hide behind organisations to indescriminately hate with no reasons of their own...get a brain, get an opinion, stop following others and live life without hurting people...i know many BNP members...

  • @sarahknowstheanswer

    ...all are descent law abiding people, they dont hate skin colour they joined the BNP to stop terrorism and curb the crime rate as the party is the only one who would stop crime by harsher punishments, its ironic how the Muslims and the BNP want the same thing (im not talking about terrorists on wither side either), the stupid part of the whole debate is at some point we are all one race, we went our own ways-now we view all other nations as foreigners...

  • @sarahknowstheanswer

    if we are 1 one race. then you wouldnt mind measures that would increase white europeans and decrease non whites, in all non white countries while at the same time getting thier tax money for it and getting preferencial treatment, and full monopoly of education of thier childrens mind, and thier political system, and thier history and financial system at our disposal. no problem with that eh?

  • i dont get it.........

  • SIEG HEIL ;)

  • after WW2 the powers that be wanted to destroy this country,they wanted to destroy every western developed country and so they have.

  • @drwf We are not an island of immigratio it is a myth to claim that earlier migrations was greatly life changing they were not the massed groups of people that came over in the fifties and sixties and the communities that did come over in bulk like the Irish and Jews all maintain a seperate cultural identity. The last time a mass imigration happened was when the anglo saxons came into England the Normans weren't as many as the anglo saxons and the English race is predominately Anglo Saxon.

  • Good vid, to those who say we have had immigration for years I say this, european in large numbers, non-european in minute numbers. There is a difference between a handful of chinese people and a million western hating medieval muslims.

  • So you can't imagine this?

    There IS no such thing as a Japanese people. This is simply a label that has been applied to anyone born in Japan over time and is exactly the same in any other nation.

    A person born in the amazon rain jungle will not just suddenly one day say "Oh wait I'm brazillian" as no one has told them they are.

    Patriotism and nationalism are both illusions used by statists to control massed groups of people and justify forced collectivism through common identity. :)

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing

    Wrong! having nations is a tribal instinct and can you imgaine if all of the boarders were to close? there would WW3 on our streets.

  • @theshow2k8

    Really? Did you figure out your nationality for yourself? Or did someone else tell you what you are?

    It's all in your head I'm afraid. The idea you share common ground with such a large group of people based on pre-determined, imaginary lines is quite irrational.

    And, actually, you do realise most large scale wars have been caused due to nations? for instance the first two world wars. Why would an individualistic society cause such irrational behaviour?

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing I think we all know what nationality we are from an early age. We learn about it in school, we experience it as we grow up. Just because it is something we are taught does not make it any less of a reality.

    I think I do share common ground with large groups of people. We speak the same language, we share similar values and traits, we are a product of similar school systems, we are the inheritors of a cultural and ethnic legacy. If you threw me into China I would have...

  • @johnbr59 Well, yes it does. Its like me imagining a line around your neighbourhood and calling it a name, then saying "everyone born in here acts a certain way because they were born in the same set of lines"

    And we share the same values? Really?

    Is every British person a Christian?

    Does every British person like football?

    Do we all think the same?

    No of course not that's a ridiculous position to hold.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing A poor argument. Here in Britain, we have different regions, counties and districts we have Yorkshire, Lancashire, The West Midlands, London, Cornwall, etc etc. Each part is distinctive while part of the greater whole, with various accents, differing customs, political affiliation, etc etc. They culminate to make what is Britain. So those lines do exist.

    I think we do. We share, on the whole for example, the values of democracy, free speech, equal rights for men and women

  • (continued) almost nothing in common with them because I wouldn't even be able to communicate. It doesn't mean I should resent them, but I would much prefer to come back to the West and live among people more culturally similar to me.

    Wars come about due to a variety of factors. Nations have been founded by wars, and nations chose to go to wars. Is your argument that we should get rid of all nations, and there be no wars, or conflict? Can you actually substantiate this ridiculous claim?

  • @johnbr59 Now this is true we do have the same language (In a very, VERY broad sense) But this is pretty much incidental to the nation. Yes people in a certain area will speak the same language, but this means they all think the same? act the same? No.

    And I'm not even arguing about wars here, that was the other guy commenting on me. I am talking about forced collectivism and forced association, the bigger picture.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing (continued) as well as societal norms and customs. I would, for example, say that Muslims do not share the same values and norms (particularly with regards to free speech, democracy and women!)

    Not every Britain is a Christian, but our Christian heritage has shaped our society and our values. Not every Briton likes football, but it is one of our most popular sports, which brings countless people together.

  • @johnbr59 Yes, these are popular but that's just generalising. Take me for instance, I think democracy is barbaric and just a nice way of saying mob rule, This does not fit with the British belief of democracy.

    So can I truly be called British? Even though my beliefs on this subject are largely different from others should I be grouped with them based on birthplace?

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing Out of interest, if you don't agree with democracy, what is your alternative?

    This doesn't mean you are not British, even if it is one of Britain's core political values. It really depends on how many British values you subscribe to, and nevertheless you are a product of and an heir to our culture whether you like it or not. If you change the people, you change the culture.

    You are grouped with them because you live in the same society. A society has to be driven by

  • @johnbr59 My alternative is anarcho-capitalism.

    But I am forced to live in the same society, In my own private property, I am still subject to the will of the majority, even though I haven't given consent.

    And to say I'm an heir to British culture, you would have to argue that I have a biological impulse to act by the stereotypical view of my nationality.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing Anarchy by definition is destructive. You could argue this is simply down to human nature. If you believe in evolution, we are animals, after all, and subject to the same primordial impulses. Therefore society needs measures of control. I cannot see how anybody can seriously advocate any form of anarchy.

    There doesn't need to be a biological impulse. The fact is that if the Britons who have collectively inherited a sporting, artistic, literary, musical,

  • @johnbr59 You're confusing anarchy with anomie. There are many ways to keep order in Anarchism from the left to the right of it.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing (continued) environment, religious and governmental identity and culture reject it, i do not believe it can survive - it will be replaced by something else - and that could very well be Islamic. The fact is, that the West has produced societies with greater freedom, rights, education and chance for the individual to reach their maximum potential as human beings than any other society. Our culture has been a major part of this. It has to be preserved.

  • @johnbr59 The West may have produced more freedom than Middle Eastern or African areas but in the grand scheme of things, it is still terribly authoritarian. The only way to achieve maximum individual liberty is through an individual oriented society.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing 'Terribly authoritarian'? Okay, that's a good one! No. The answer is that the West must be maintained. Without the West, we have a new dark ages-literally. Read Mark Steyn's 'America Alone: The End of the World as We Know it'. The answer to the inequalities that still exist in the world is not to destroy the west and culture through mass third world immigration. It requires industrialization, greater education, health care, etc etc - this can only be done gradually.

  • @johnbr59 All of these things are provided easily in my system. However with the Western belief that democracy is so wonderful not much can be done to enlighten people. And of course the system we live in now is authoritarian. The war on drugs, gun control and political correctness are just a few examples of the anti-freedom system we live under.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing Well I believe in democracy. I don't believe in globalisation, and I believe in individualism to the extent that I think western society provides greater prosperity, freedoms and opportunities, better health, and better opportunities for you to live your full human potential, than any other society. I think it falls into a narrow band of cultural inheritance.

    I agree there are anti-freedom aspects to our system, these do need changing.

  • @johnbr59 The 'globalisation' bogeyman. That word seems to mean anything to anyone. BNP's use it to mean 'Jewish Bankers'. Advocates for the developing world use it to mean unfair trade, protectionism and exploitation etc...

    If we strip it down to meaning literately acting in a unified way in decisions about the planet and the species, I think that is very sensible and unavoidable if you wish to maintain even the basic personal freedoms you are so worried about.

  • @CmdrTobs of course the word has many connotations, but I used it in the context of mass immigration, and outsourcing (this type of population globalisation)

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing certain values, interests and aspirations for the common good of those that make up that society.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing Languages allows us to communicate, and it is just one example of our culture: our shared history, temperament, our sporting, artistic, literary and musical heritage. Our environment, our interests and aspirations, our language, our religion and our form of government. If you disagree with glottalization, you should reject multiculturalism.

  • @johnbr59 Multiculturalism has many definitions, so since I'm not sure which one you go by I'm simply going to say. I realize everyone is individual and should be able to associate with anyone voluntarily and I believe in free travel.

    When I say globalisation I mean more the belief that everyone is the same, I believe we are all different, everyone, not just different nationalities but we are ALL individual. Therefore I believe in voluntary association.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing 'This is simply a label that has been applied to anyone born in Japan over time and is exactly the same in any other nation.'

    So there is a Japanese people then? You just contend it by calling it a label. You're practically arguing semantics.

    You're an idiot. It's like playing tennis with someone who just says 'your ace is just a social construct'. Different peoples exist. Different people have different cultures and identities, reflected in the character of their nation.

  • @johnbr59 Well no there isn't, as the lines which define any nation are purely imaginary. I'm talking about the label being applied based on a nationalists perceptions.

    Of course different peoples exist, that is my argument, we are ALL different as we are all individuals. I'm arguing that my identity is my individuality rather than nationality.

    You're up against an individualist here, not a globalist.

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing Just because you claim they are imaginary does not make them so. Those lines are defined by territory and by the citizens who reside in said territory. They are defined by that nations history, its culture, its values, its people, its society and its economy. Nations exist. I don't see how anybody can say the concept is 'imaginary'. Is this some kind of nihilistic approach? That things only exist because we say they do, and so really they don't exist? What kind of an argument

  • @JakkaLakkaDingDing (continued) is that?

    Different people exist as individuals, yes. But every individual is part of a greater culture and society. Individuals from different cultures and societies will have different values, religions, and ways of life.

    Your identity is shaped more by your nationality more than you think, and perhaps more than you would like. I on the other hand embrace my identity. You are a good example of how Britain has come to reject its identity as racist and hateful.

  • @johnbr59 Yes I know, but I'm saying individuals from "the same culture", also have different values, religions and ways of life. Therefore we can't be clumped in the same group.

    And again, I embrace my identity, the difference being my identity is based on my own experiences and preferences, whereas you've just taken up an already existing one. You refer to your identity as British, I refer to my identity as me.

  • You fuckin turds, You're not british. YOU'RE NORWEGIAN!

    By Harald we claim what's ours, as it's actually Norwegian.

    King Rollo --> William

    Not to mention all the cities we founded, and all the women we screwed.

    yeeh... no doubt, just hand the pile over. King Harald will accept Elizabeth at his palace in Oslo a week from now, there she will recieve her new title as "The Sherrif of England, vassalage of the Great King Harald" Huzzah! or as we say in Norwegian (Your new language)

    Hurra!

  • @Serethen Actually that line was knocked out by the plantagents and Angevins plus the British queen is from another line again and completly seperate from the Norweginas. Battle of Stamford Bridge look it up.

  • @TheMaskhadov

    Dude. I'm just jokin..Stamford bridge, I live 30 meter from Harald Hardråde's "grave" he's under the pavement right outside my door.

    ofc I know that the linage was knocked out long time ago. I'm just messing around with them nazis.

    You're wrong on one thing.

    The Norwegian royal family is not of a viking royal house.

    King Harald V is the first foreign Monarch in the line of succesion to the British throne.

    Maud of Wales, daughter of Edward VII, and Queen of Norway

    Look it up ;P

  • Unity through Nobility

    Aryanism . net

  • The Chinese , Muslims and Jewish have been coming to Britain for hundreds of years prior to 1945 It's not a new thing.

    Yemeni sailors, Ukrainian diaspora and the Black British in the 17th Century are all reflects on migration that came integrated and are no longer visible.

    Ironically many asain and black migrants are far more grounded in British culture than White Migrants due the empire. Drinking tea, watching cricket and speaking english (having gone to British school abroad).

  • @theshamonline Right on, and where do these idiots suppose tea came from in the first place?

  • @songsiIikejk I don't thinkl its right to remain a bunch of people that think that the British are superior to everyone by reminding them their forefathers laid claim to the largest Empire the world has ever seen and its effect is still having an effect even today.

  • @TheMaskhadov I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you are trying to say. I mean literally. The words themselves as you have arranged them make no sense to me. I was agreeing with the man's comments that immigration has been integral to the creation of the modern UK by using as example the fact that the quintessential English beverage is in fact a cultural product of Asia. Perhaps you misunderstood me.

  • @songsiIikejk It was not immigration that brought tea it was an overseas empire. What I was saying was that to remind a bunch of people that believe the British are superior that they had one of the biggest empires in the world isn't exactly helping.

  • @songsiIikejk Just because we got tea from Asia doesn't mean it is a purely Asian cultural component, it doesn't refute the fact that it is an extremely British one today. Britain was shaped by its empire, and this includes cultural influences from abroad. But this is no way constitutes a meaningful argument for mass immigration and multiculturalism, it just shows how the British were able to pick and choose the desirable cultural aspects, products, and natural resources of other nations.

  • @johnbr59 "British were able to pick and choose the desirable cultural aspects, products, and natural resources of other nations."

    Which is exactly what the Xenophobic BNPers would have shut down if you had been running the empire. "No bloody wog leaf juice for us real Brits!" "No Dutch bloody juniper vodie in my waters of quinine, guv'ner" You can't pick and choose desirable elements from cultures you shut out as undesirable.

  • @songsiIikejk Would they? If you can find the part of their manifesto which says that, I'll believe you. The point is that societies can be impacted positively from various cultural aspects of different societies, but it doesn't justify mass immigration or multiculturalism, because I think that can only lead eventually to the dismantling of the majority culture.

  • @theshamonline

    Grounded in british culture is not being british

  • @StarOfFortune It's a pretty good start though!

    If other 'more foreign' groups have assimilated within a hundred years without destroying Britain, why won't others.

  • @theshamonline In extremely small proportions. This was a consequence of empire. It cannot be compared in any meaningful way to mass immigration today. Doing so just proves you are an idiot.

  • nick griffin's daughter became hindu recently and likes curry with her cocks.

  • We are all human, why does it matter if the "races" mix?

    BNP is really making all the other anti-islam parties look like racists too :/

  • I now know why jamesrbobdobbes hates the welsh. To say the whole worlds sick source can be traced to wales is going to far. The welsh only take up a small part of the UK and anyone who visits will find most friendly.

    Anyone that has a ounce of intelligence will know the truth about the welsh ancestry and can be researched anywhere on the Internet. And not all welsh are just simply welsh I am also English with some English and Scot friends.

    He is just trying to bait people!!!

  • jamesrbobdobbes Is a coward who as threatens and bullies women. He is upset because I had the guts to stand up to him with no real disrespect from me towards him. He writes total bull all over YouTube against other Brits. He is a coward who thinks - believe it or not..only ginger headed Scot's are the real native Brits. Did not mind him saying a few harsh words but to go as far as saying I was a dead whores love when my mother did die recently was sick.

    Nothing wrong in opinions but he is nuts

  • @8385misty typical uaf commie

  • jamesrbobdobs Is on here again about his trash Just because I stood up to him, no way are the welsh Greek, if they where I would admit it. His hatred of the welsh is deeper than he makes out. One minute he is Scot then English and told me his surname is Lloyd - a welsh name. he is not BNP and has put me off supporting them. He is coward and sorry to say - so are most BNP. No will stand up to him,putting down people who do have right to be in UK. FIGHT THE MUSLIMS - THATS A JOKE!!

  • You love our country so much that you would vote for the BNP - a party that, if in power, would destroy our economy and health care system over night?. Wow, you must really love our country ¬_¬

  • The problem in our country is Zionism.They hide behind this rubbish and do their filthy work.

  • Most white british people totally reject the BNP. Yes many have concerns about the levels of immigration and muslim extremism. But they wont ever vote for the BNP as they seem them as extremists and freaks.

  • We have been softened for decades. The continual dumbing-down of our educational system and the increasing balality of popular culture are just two trends we can trace to a sick source. That source is Welsh people. They are right out in the open. Society has become so Welsh that most people do not recognize Welshness when they step in it. Like my mother's lawyer. Fucking Welsh bastard.