Top 20 Líderes militares de la historia Top 20 military leaders

[mastermeme7]

y hitler

[AndreAugustoPassari]

Para uma leitura crítica sobre os heróis que nos são legados pela cultura, e também uma reflexão sobre moral, procurar no youtube por: Davi, o Hitler da bíblia?

[mat290596]

@marezzo32 I continue here : he led army of italia, which was really ill-equiped and bad trained. He fought again austria and he win. Then he fought against coalition, at the head of the french empire, so the ennemies were united, and had more troops. (Austerlitz, Wagram, Iena, Borodino...) so, I don't know if he is at the same level that Cortez is, but if he isn't, he is not far...

[mat290596]

@marezzo32 Oh my god, Cortez...the inca... my error is inexcusable ><. Sorry. I thought that Cortez defeated the aztecs whith the help of natives troops from tribes which were hostile to the aztecs, but you're probably right... 200 soldiers... It's incredible ! About Napoléon now, he participated to the revolution wars, his first great battle was at toulon. And you told that he had the best army of his time... no during the italian campaign, he led the army of italia :

[marezzo32]

"et denique titulo "Carolus Serenissimus Augustus a Deo coronatus, magnus pacificus imperator, qui et per misericordiam Dei rex Francorum et Longobardorum" IMPERATOR ROMANORVM"

He was the tittle of emperor of western world...not only the kings of the franks or the germans.

[mat290596]

where is Charlemagne, It's his french name, I don't know his english name. To help you to understand about who I mean : He became The Frankish Emperor in 800(easy to remember^^)

[marezzo32]

@mat290596

Charlemagne is in other of my videos as roman emperor who he was.

[mat290596]

@marezzo32 Charlemagne ? A roman emperor ? no... He was frankish, and the frankish kingdom/empire didn't born in Roma, but in France/germany/Belgium (in France, the frankish are named "francs". France... franc... it's similar, isn't it ?)

[mat290596]

@egagu1976 Napoléon wrote the french civil code, which was the basis for the state constitution of many countries, and which is still used in France actually. Cortez defeat an empire which use obsolete technologies,more, he has done it whith the help of many tribes which were hostile to the incas. When the europeans arrived, the incas were thinking that they were gods ! Not a good thing for the troops morale !

[mat290596]

@egagu1976 Cortez was a great general, yes, he destroyed inca's empire with a few of soldiers, yes he win, while napoléon fall, but while Cotez was Fighting the Incas, Napoléon fought Russia, UK, Prussia, Austria, mamelouks, Ottoman Empire, Sweden, spain, a coalition of small german states, french royalists... and they were having the same muskets, artillery and horses ! But Napoléon win, win and win again, so he stay at the head of France from 1793 to 1815, 22 years...

[marezzo32]

@mat290596

Ahaam I´ve visited your channel. You are french, just I had thought :D

Well, I am sure that you won´t change your point of view. Only I want to say that Cortez (who fough against the AZTECS) conquered a unkown country, with millions of inhabitants, with extreme climates...only with 200 valerous soldier...Napoleon defeated a lot of europeans armies, but with the best army of his time, which had been created in the french revolutionary wars, not by napoleon.

Pardon mon ami!

[bighoonk]

ALL of you "Youtubers" go back and study your history and fight out WHY that dirty caballero Cortez was able to do that!

[egagu1976]

.Napoleon won many battles but did a lot of shit Yambio. Indeed, Spain was the first country to defeat and then you already know the story and spent his last days as ...... What has left traces Napoleon in Europe? NO. And CUTS? For a trip date for the countries of Central America and Mexico have both cultural footprint language that he and his army wrought and almost 500 years later still endures

[aledreyandmill]

1ºpublio africanus

2ºanibal barca

3ºalejandro magno

4º julio cesar

publio en ninguna de las batallas k el comando no perdio ninguno julio cesar aprendio de publio y aun asi tuvo derrotas eg= el asedio de gergovia

[rodusmorthem]

y adolf hitler?

[kiss138]

Even today the dream of every militairy leader is to achieve the glory of ALEXANDER the GREAT !! According the historians HE is number ONE.

In a deck of playing cards the four aces reprecent the great militairy leaders EVER:

Number 1. Alexander the great (Swords), number 2. Julius Cesar (Diamonds),

number 3. Charlemagne king of the franks (Clubs) and number 4.Napoleon Bonaparte (Hearts).

Just set the record straight.

[gueroalfa]

vete ala chingada alegandro el magno es el primero

[Ticonio]

Alejandro debería ser primero, como genio estratega y táctico a la vez, algo que puede compartir con Napoleón y Julio César...pero ninguno de estos dos hubiera liderado la caballería Macedónica como lo hizo Alejandro a una edad tan temprana...además ambos estudiaron muy bien a Alejandro...quien evidentemente era un genio. Saludos

[vidman163]

para el que iso este video: A caso tu madre te dejo caer quando eras un infantil

[damianpaya]

los que conocen de histroria muy pocos en estos tiempos

[SaraCHAII]

Bwahaha This video is way off. Julius Caesar??....number 1?....I mean dont get me wrong but Julius caesar was more of a politician than he was a military tactitioner. Julius caesar kissed the feet of Alexander the Great's statue and weeped wishing to be as great as Alexander was. not to mention he lost some campaigns....he is not worthy of being number 1.

[marezzo32]

.......of course Caesar the fist!

[SaraCHAII]

One of the first...but never number one. To be number one he must've done something truly great... I dont know like...maybe conquering the known world??...maybe??.....I didnt see Caesars army march onto India....never saw him explaring the desserts in the Middle East. Judea and Egypt were the farthest his army ever went. No number one for me.

[Spark02ify]

@marezzo32

Cortés before Napoleon lol

You are a big joke

[Spark02ify]

Cortés must be in top 20 or 30

[marezzo32]

@Spark02ify

Cortes defeated the mexican empire with 200 soldiers...

[jensenjose5]

muy bien! pero yo creo q el gran capitan deberia estar mas arriba

[marezzo32]

hombre, cuanto tiempo jejeje

es que los que tiene delante son muy buenos tambien..

saludos!

[Spark02ify]

@marezzo32

Anyway Napoleon is by far superior to Cotés

[marezzo32]

@Spark02ify

Well, I supose that you are french...in that case I won´t apologise you, but listen one thing: Napoleon was defeated when Cortes had triumph...

[Spark02ify]

@marezzo32

Cortés didn't conquered Europe

Napoleon won more battles than any other in the world, I have never seen Cortes in the top 10 except on this video because a spaniard made it

[protego1887]

Esta muy acertado, pero Ghengis Khan deberia tener posiciones mas altas. Y creo que hay demasiados españoles (Soy español, que conste). Por cierto Hinderburg, deberia estar, ¿no? Y trajano...

[marezzo32]

gengis khan me parece que mucho utilizar la fuerza bruta y la sorpresa pero no creo que fuese un "genial" táctico.

Y Trajano sí, un gran general, pero con los medios con los que disponía debió hacer mucho más.

[Caudillo1939]

5***** para ti, Marezzo. Aunque en algunos de ellos discrepo sobre su posición, caso de Alejandro Magno, que para mi ha sido el más grande de la Historia.

[marezzo32]

gracias por el cinco, pero mal me parece que infravalores a Julio César!

[Caudillo1939]

No osaría infravalorar a tan magnífico militar, pero en mi opinión, no puede compararse con el Gran Alejandro; la hazaña que le monarca macedonio logro me parece al alcance de una sola persona hasta la fecha: él mismo.

[marezzo32]

No te dudo de que la obra de Alejandro Magno sencillamente fue colosal, pero me da la impresión (personal, por supuesto) de que carecía del liderazgo de Julio César. Ten en cuenta que, al fin y al cabo, Alejandro Magno casi siempre tenía todos los recursos a su alcance y sus grandes campañas militares ya habían sido prediseñadas por Filipo, su padre. Con esto no le quito un ápice, pero debido a lo que tuvo que afrontar y vencer, creo que Julio César es el más grande ;)

[Caudillo1939]

Bueno, es difícil ponerse de acuerdo ya que eso depende de los criterios personales... Pero yo insisto en que lo logrado por Alejandro no tiene parangón, aunque negar el genio militar de Cayo Julio César desde luego sería una insensatez...

[marezzo32]

Bueno, para gustos colores. Aún así, estamos de acuerdo en que ambas posturas son comprensibles ¿verdad?

[Caudillo1939]

Si, ahí estamos totalmente de acuerdo, jeje Y ya es algo...

[TioDonTomas]

Tienes una pequeña errata en el nombre de "John Churchill, duque de Marlborough"...

[marezzo32]

¿cual, caballero?

[TioDonTomas]

Has escrito "Jhon" por "John" y "Marborough" por "Mar-l-borough"

:)

[marezzo32]

Joer :(, pido disculpas por ello

[TioDonTomas]

Qué va hombre, por Dios. Simplemente te lo dije para que esas erratas sin importancia no afearan tu trabajo y tu esfuerzo, nada más.

[marezzo32]

bueno jejej, pero gracias por la indicación ;)