she's come from not rich tiger's for money... she just doing that for tiger coz she n tiger live there almost 2 years that's way... she marryd for money. he'd give so much money for her... this people r sick really really is........................... if tiger is white he can kip kids with hem he can take care of. in this country just like that really is. :(
she's come from not rich tiger's money... she just doing that for tiger coz she n tiger live there almost 2 year that's way... she marryd money. he'd give so much money for her... this people r sick really really is........................... if tiger is white he can kip kids with hem he can take care of. in this country just like that really is. :(
She's the scum of the earth. To think the majority of people on earth live in makeshift shelters and this BITCH is not satisfied with a massive mansion so much so that she bulldozes it and builds a new one is disgusting.
As far as I can see at least she is creating more jobs. She tearing down the old house and probably going to build a mega plaza to replace it. I guess their is nothing wrong with that. At least she spending here money on something to help the economy rebound.
To bad no one else will ever live in tiger woods old mega house, oh well.
God, some times I wish I were a beautiful woman, rather than an average-looking man, so that I could marry a rich man and get a huge divorce-settlement XD
To be honest if i'd all that money I'd buy a Lamborghini and probably another Lamborghini just so I'd have one to drive and one to admire and think how pretty. Probably build a big ass house to.
And have big gates to keep the government from taking my money. Scratch that last part I'll just buy a politician and have him make me more money.
TYT has gotten soo shit now stop being such overly opinionated bastards how is this more important than all the other things in the news. Also Fuck you Cenk and Ana
@rynb93 oh gawd this pisses me off so much its her money if she wants roll it up and shove it in her ass she can! also taxing wont take it all it is HER money so yaa the rich should be taxed but ye shud come off yer high horse and lose some weight
There's all kinds of suffering in the world. People are homeless, hungry, dying of disease. You could help them with your fantastic excess wealth. Or, spend a couple million dollars to tear down a perfectly good mansion and build it over again. Like Cenk said, tax the rich. I now have no sympathy for her, either.
Idk about this one. It's not like Elin's hurting anyone or screwing the rest of us out of anyone, so why not let her do what she wants with her money? I bet she has something particular in mind she wants to do with the property, possibly something really cool.
TERMITES people TERMITES !!! Elin wasn't such a bitch after all ( she even offered habitat for humanity to take whatever they wanted for a month. Nice gesture.).
So...she takes her money. Decides where she wants to live, wants to design it to her own tastes most likely for the long term (a house she can die in and have no regrets) so she creates jobs by destroying it, and then by designing and building a new one?
I'm not suggesting I don't agree with the "tax the rich" sentiment, but this is not a supporting argument. She is actually SPENDING her money, not hiding it in a hole and being destructive with it. I wish ALL the rich did as she is doing.
It's her $; she spends it like she wants to. It's not unusual for ppl with money to spend it.The English castles, Biltmore, etc. It's all relative. In fact, most ppl spend in line with their income.
Their arguments are extremely silly. Take an issue like pollution. The free market solution to a company polluting is to show your disapproval by buying from another company. First off, in a country without govt watchdogs how the hell is anyone to know? Second, often times you can't buy from another company ie. there's only one electric company that services my area, if they're doing something wrong I'm not able to switch. And 3rd if no ones telling them not too they'll generally all do it.
And no, history shows that whenever radical free market economics are implemented the middle class DOES degrade, as well as further impoverishment of the poor. Friedman was probably the poorest example you could give. The idea that the "market" takes care of all is a falsehood. If you're willing to discuss this I'd be glad to go into detail.
@senortonyful You're soooooo right! Free market economics with zero regulation is inherently flawed because it assumes that people are going to always "do the right thing". However, in no other field would you even THINK of not having rules and regulations. You wouldn't raise children w/o rules. You wouldn't run a hospital w/o regulations. Why on EARTH would it make sense to run an entire economy without rules and regulations?! Conservatives trip me out with that nonsense!
Where's the trickle? The fact is that nearly every economic system has been tried at one point in time or another. Friedman had his experiment in Chile and drove the country past the brink of disaster. The same free market nonsense was tried in post-Soviet Russia and failed miserably. A perfect example would be the last U.S tax holiday. Tax-free money flooded U.S corps, they still cut jobs. A company can have all the money in the world and they're not going to create jobs unless someones buying.
I do think the rich should be taxed a fair amount like everyone else. I do agree though that the rich are not obligated to be charitable and spend wisely, and shouldn't be taxed just because they have extra dollars. However, the rich aren't total victims...they have a history of buying favors from politicians, that exploit the rest of us. Plus with tax funded subsidies and bailouts, they don't hurt all that much either. But for what you say, it is true.
lol anyone who bought a 12 million dollar house and only 2 people live in it all year. I'm sorry got ripped off, and i hope they enjoy cleaning, heating and taking care of something you will never enjoy.
@Otokogoroshi That costs money too, I guess I'm just a Simple man that enjoys simple things. Makes it so I don't have to slave too hard for the Rich then too. Much easier way of living in my opinion. Rich people and all that money are not happy, and this proves all that Money don't bring happiness or allows them to enjoy life any better then I.
@Wangnarok That's true, what you are seeing in these comments are people's true colors shining through. On a psychological level, some people simply cannot stand others having more than them. Its sends them into an almost murderous rage. Such people are quite frequent TYT's channel and Cenk is definitely one of them. Their sense of envy, and jealousy is so overwhelming that they have to fleece the rich guy at any cost. Coming up with some bullshit "I care about the poor" story is just a facade
Even if im a swed but i think Elins is brigheter then you give here Credit for, think se can se a good deal in this propery, buy in for 12, get rid of the shabby house and then buld a new on, in the end she will spend about 20 miljon but hawe a house worth a bit more then that.
Well, Well, Well. Look at these dumbasses. This is all they got. I thought this was supposed to be entertainment. Now, Cenk where is the joke about how Tiger did those women, the sinful shit you normally say? Also, why has Ana suddenly started reporting real stories like the whole deportation story as this was one of the few of the "entertainment" stories the whole week. The answer is that we have finally gotten to these assholes. Just wait, the sinful Wolf-PAC is going as well. Take that.
Anna doesn't know anything about this one. In palm beach (the richest zip code in the country) that is not just common but it is the only thing done with those mansions. You do not buy a mansion in palm beach to live in you buy it to tear it down and build a different one. That is all. You would never see someone buy a house there and just move in. Unless it is historic like maralago or something and you legally cannot tear it down.
Oh, come on Cenk! This lady is employing people in the construction industry, the industry that was hardest hit by the recession. This is a case of egregious job creation, and Tiger Woods' money is going to the middle and lower classes to build the new mansion. It's awesome!
I hope you realize that I was making a joke. I am a poor person. The shed was literally falling down and I still used as much of the lumber from it as a could. Apparently any time someone makes a joke on youtube they have to write out "just joking" or people freak out.
Taxing the rich isn't going to solve anything! You need to balance the budget by cutting spending.
Cut the military budget and the social programs. Just creating more revenue by taking more money out of the private sector and killing millions of jobs isn't really going to solve ANYTHING!
Please get it through your head TYT not all rich people work for Goldman Sachs and other speculative corporations most rich people are owners of producing business which we need to grow the economy.
@antonio3p1 I respectfully disagree, the rich need to be taxed more in order to get more revenue in. Also i definitely think we should balance the budget by cutting the military drastically and cutting some social programs.
The need for jobs will only come from demand. If workers pay more taxes they will purchase less goods and services. A portion of the tax burden was lightened for the rich on the false premise that they would reinvest excess capital in commodities and services rather than gamble in the casino houses of equity markets.
In other words:
PAYING PEOPLE TO CREATE JOBS THEIR IS NO MARKET FOR IS FUCKING RETARDED. TAX THE RICH.
@TruthDevours We're not paying them. We're just letting them keep their money.
By the way I think you lack understanding of the capitalistic economic model. It works for 1000 people and it will also work for 7 billion people for that matter. What I'm saying is that there's nothing wrong with the economic model and there's nothing wrong with letting rich people keep their money. The economy is so bad not because of free markets but because of government interference. Learn Austrian Economics.
@antonio3p1 The economy collapsed because we don't check on what the company's are doing. A few months ago a Belgian bank was about to collapse, after it was saved by the French and Belgian governments we found out they had over 3 times the bnp of the entire country of Belgium in derivative bets with money they don't have. The collapse of that bank would have killed Belgium and taken down the entire EU in one big domino event. I say fuck capitalism is it leads to this.
What leads to this is the Federal Reserve giving out interest free loans and the government bailling them out whenever they make a mistake or fail.
If it wasn't for that terrible economic enviroment created by the federal government banks and other speculative corporations wouldn't focus so much on the derivatives business because they know that they would actually FAIL if they did it.
@antonio3p1 You've made an assumption that taxing the rich is going to kill jobs. Fortunately that theory doesn't pan out. What does create jobs is putting money INTO the poor and middle class ie. redistributive tax policies, social programs. Then you've created a demand. The rich end up with the money anyways (the poor/middle spend it all ) it's just that everyone else gets something for the money in the mean also. Cutting taxes on business if no ones buying helps nothing.
@senortonyful Well that theory first of all is socialism which doesn't work for several reasons. One is economic another is also morals which I do not have time to explain in a youtube comment. I suggest you read some Milton Friedman books.
Your theory says that there is no such thing as trickle-down economics, which is not true. The middle class will still be there even without wealth distribution.
Also giving people an income for doing nothing is such a bad idea.
@antonio3p1 " that theory first of all is socialism which doesn't work"--It must be nice seeing the world in black and white, as if there are any actual examples of a purely socialist or capitalist economy in the world. Your comment is so broad as to be utterly meaningless.
@SupermarketsRevil No but whenever we've been closest to capitalism we've been the most succesful and the most free.
When we have been closest to socialism as we are now we have been poor and our civil liberties have been taking away, our wars have expanded and our endless wasteful spending has aswell.
@antonio3p1 "whenever we've been closest to capitalism we've been the most succesful &the most free"-- This whole 'closer to X' phrase is a waste of bandwidth. Be specific in what you are talking about. Yes, free (but regulated) markets have been very beneficial to economic growth. So has taxation which leads to investment in infrastructure, education &research.
"When we have been closest to socialism as we are now"--Who is 'we'? Nations like Germany have 'socialist' policies & are successful.
@SupermarketsRevil Germany is not succesful. They might be doing better than a lot of other people but they still have massive debt.
Through the American "golden age" period we have low taxes, almost no regulations and a small decentralized government which almost did nothing, and that was the time were we had the BIGGEST middle class the world had ever seen and the most prosperity.
Now we are poor, uneducated, have a massive national debt and we're nationbuilding for our empire.
@antonio3p1 At present we are seeing relatively higher tax rates for the middle class and lower tax rates for the most wealthy. Financial disparity in the US is increasing dramatically and it is becoming more and more difficult for the middle class to live comfortably. During many periods of US economic growth through the 20th century, tax rates were significantly higher than they are today.
American infrastructure is crumbling as its bought and paid for politicians funnel money to the wealthy
@SupermarketsRevil During most of US tax rate history we didn't have a federal income tax at all. So don't argument doesn't hold any ground.
You complain about too high tax rates for the middle and lower class. Well how about we just have low tax rates for everybody. Stop the welfare system which doesn't work. Stop the warfare and stop trying to spread "democracy" around the world and mind our own business.
@antonio3p1 There is a reason I specified economic growth in the 20th century; clearly it is a different macroeconomic environment when there is no national income tax.
"You complain about too high tax rates for the middle and lower class"--No, I'm complaining about financial disparity. A given tax rate may be more or less justifiable depending on what the government provides in return.
@SupermarketsRevil Financial disparity is not going to be fixed through high taxes. Quite the contrary actually. Look at India. For decades they had a central planned economy and a lot of hand outs to the poor but none of that helped and their misery continued but when they got rid of that and adopted a free market system they got richer and more prosperous.
Low taxes, getting rid of regulations and no government interference is the way to go if you want what's best for the poor.
@antonio3p1 Because a nation like India has comparable demographics and economy to the US -__- Of course free markets are beneficial. the question is what regulation is needed. We've all seen what happens when there is too little regulation; competition dries up and is replaced by a small handful of multinationals who seek to maximise short term gain at the expense of the general public. In fascist police states like the US they even get taxpayer funded bailouts as a reward for this theft.
@SupermarketsRevil No it's very simple alll over the world you can see the same results. In economies with centralized planning the economy is bad at adopting and transforming whenever the demand changes or other events that might disrupt the market occur.
Also throughout American and world history whenever big corporations have become too big too fail is when their markets were regulated and government was too big and therefor also corrupt.
@antonio3p1 "throughout American and world history whenever big corporations have become too big too fail is when their markets were regulated"--This is demonstrably fallacious. The big four banks in Australia have not merged solely because of regulation. The leaders of these firms express a desire to merge their businesses, obviously so that their is reduced competition.
You don't seem to understand the distinction between regulated free markets and a centralised economy.
@SupermarketsRevil So what was the government supposed to do? Force those banks not to merge? No that would give government too much power and therefor increase lobbying.
The problem in Australia will be fixed in a couple of years by competition. Other banks with rise and force the four big merging banks to lower their prices in order to stay competitive. I'm sorry but the whole socialistic idea that big corporations will rule everything in a free market is not true.
@antonio3p1 "So what was the government supposed to do? Force those banks not to merge?"--Yes, and that is what they have done and are doing.
By making this obvious implication that you think such regulation is bad you either think 1) more competition is bad (which I'll assume you don't agree with) or 2) More mergers of financial institutions/fewer competitors is going to increase competition.
The reality is that corporations do rule in the US, and they are anti-competition/free markets
@SupermarketsRevil No I don't think more competition is bad but your idea that competition will not merge again after a few years is not true.
Also it's called freedom. We can't allow freedom and then prohibit it somewhere else as long as they aren't stealing, commiting fraud or violating any other law.
If they want to merge let them merge. If they raise prices to much watch other banks form and steal their customers. It's that simple. It's called competition.
@antonio3p1 that fine but then dont bail them out either, and thats what created the problem the banks lobbied and put their people in the government to deregulate, they go back and forth from government to the banks and corporation, we have fascism here,its the merger of state and corporate power ,no they should never have been allowed to be in ght government in the 1st place ,and should not have been able to use their influence to repeal glass stegal act,and the rest of the deregulation
@bulletproof2353 Those regulatory bureaucracies are just going to get lobbied by the fortune 400 corporations in order to make their own regulations and kill competition. All you can do is minimize the government and enforce private property laws and prosecute banks who commit fraud. The problem is all the politicians are bought and corrupted but they wouldn't be so corrupt if government had less power, simply because the fortune 400 corporations wouldn't lobby as they do now
@antonio3p1 Excuse me, I am Indian, i don't know where you're getting your info from, but gvmt never gave "hand outs" to the poor. People are poor is because of growing population & corruption. People are poor because of lack of jobs & opportunities. People are poor because of lack of investment in education vs opportunities for middle class & rich. CONTINUED....
@Stingerbillion No India had a huged centralized economy a few decades ago you should check up on your facts and it was first when government let the market roam more freely thing became better. Now the poor might not be doing as well as they could but they are certainly better off now compared to the past.
@antonio3p1 You are telling me i don't know my country? I grew up there! I follow every news that happens. I would like to know which sites you get your information from because clearly you don't know shit about India. You are right about one thing and that's India has opened up it's market for jobs investment. Please don't use "free market", there is no such thing today. Every country has capitalism, India certainly has embraced it thanks to work of Manmohan Singh (PM). CONTINUED...
@antonio3p1 You're out of your mind if you think i will waste my time by listening to Republican spread lies and failed policies on what is needed in this country or not.
@Stingerbillion Well then keep being ignorant and keep listening to the establishment you sheep. One day you will live in tyranny if you don't wake up.
@Stingerbillion the problem is that the government regulation is not working ,the government dont regulate the big corporations and banks, it uses the money it gets from them,and you to regulate the little guy out of existence with regulation that the big corporations never have to abide by cause they paid to put it them place the government is nothing more than the enforcer for the big elite banking and corporate cartels and it dont help that those same interests also own the media TOTALLY
@bulletproof2353 so there is no media it is corporate state run propaganda its just like north korea ,an none of there corporate GOP or democrat puppets will ever fix it,there all OWNED and so are you
@antonio3p1 CONTINUED...Less regulations is why buildings are crumbling in India. Less regulation is what caused bridge to collaspe in New Dehli in 2010. Different religions, caste systems, different ethnics. Less regulations is why companies are free to pollute in water ways. Today more people are demanding more regulations and crack on corrupted officials. You don't know what the hell you are talking about!
@Stingerbillion If you think that companies are allowed to pollute because of the lack of regulation then you're crazy. That's not why they are. In India there are probably government regulations against polution, but because the government regulators have been bought up by corporations those laws and regulations don't apply to the people that have bought goverment only to the people who haven't and thus killing off competition. It's called fascism you know.
@antonio3p1 CONTINUED....I am sure you are a nice person, but to spread false info about how regulations & public education don't work is absolutely bullshit. It's people like you who are bad for this country & many other nations about the world. Regulations are desperately needed in this country if it wants to have a future. You should apply at Goldman Sachs, i am sure they are hiring people like you. You will make millions spreading lies.
@antonio3p1 " Stop the welfare system which doesn't work"--I agree. At the moment the US is doing a reverse robin hood; stealing from the poor and giving to the rich, corporate socialism. There should be no such thing as too big to fail. Perhaps if the US gov't invested in education, infrastructure and industry instead of giving more morally repulsive subsidies to the most wealthy citizens and corporations then it's citizens might actually have the chance to live comfortably.
@SupermarketsRevil I agree, subsidizing any business and giving them a unatural advantage is wrong.
Public education has always been bad. It's wasteful, it's full of bureaucracy and most importantly to know is that it's full of government propaganda such as pro interventionist foreign policy and keynesian economics.
So public education is a bad thing and we shouldn't invest in that.
Infrastructure is something I can deal with but even that can be handled better by the private market.
Okay, so she's a crazy rich-ass bitch. Fair enough. Should the rich be taxed more? Absolutely.
However, through her tearing down a home and creating a new one, she totally created business maybe a couple jobs as well. From construction contractors to lumber companies to architects, this act of bitchery helped slightly stimulate the economy. Probably among the few rare cases that "trickle down economics" can be verified as legitimately occasionally, though not often, happening.
Guess that project kept the unemployment numbers down for awhile. Lots of sales taxes for the local area and money into the suppliers and their sources. A flat tax or just a sales tax and no income taxes. Good or bad. What good is all that money if it isn't being spent.
Once again, Ana is not prepared. She is always blowing it. This time she calls it NORTH PALM BEACH, FL. For fuck's sake. That place doesn't even exist! Doesn't Cenk read her the riot act? Ana, get it together.
So she married a rich bad man who cheated on her and gets $10 million. Get locked up in prison for 10 years before you prove your innocence & you get how much? There is way way way too much money in divorce settlements at every level from the super rich to the poor. The guy was a cock, was he $10 million worth of a cock? No. With the law as it stands and divorce rates as they stand, you have to be a complete fool to be a man and get married. If marriage improves society, we need to fix this.
We don't really know if the house was in great condition. Maybe she liked the place but the house had foundations problems and needed to be demolished. Have you seen her house in Sweden? It's really no big deal. She is never been a person with an extravagant personality and taste.
@Saaduk92 Most "charities" shave off 80 cents on every dollar for "administrative costs". She'd be better off volunteering. You are too concerned with money.
She brougt it for the land probley wanna build her own dreamhouse child proof
Most Swed´s stay friends after divorse ..for the sake of the children..
THAT`S THE SWEDISH MENTALETY
TTiger Wood payed Russian Roulette with Elins life having sex without condome with 100s of girls..There´s still golfers friends of both who reufuse to speak to Tiger Woods
@hash1212121212 Because she's smart and he's an idiot. It's your own fault for not raising your voice when a yahoo gets billions for hitting a ball into a hole.
Its funny how in 10 years that $100,000,000 is going to -$50,000,000. When you get that much money without knowing the actual hard ship one has to go through to achieve that much, you just spend, spend and before you know it its GONE.
if you have $100,000,000. Automatically $50,000,000 should be invested in various property's, business etc etc etc etc. Not pay $12,000,000 fucken million on a house.
@elfornse Alright. Let's make a deal. I won't ask Tiger Woods to pay an additonal 4% on his adjusted earned income above $350,000, but don't you dare bitch about the economy when the top 1% is paying the lowest tax rates in 50 years. And your republo-libetarian friends don't try to fucking take away the social security & the safety net programs that I, my family & other taxpayers have already paid into. Deal?
@schillerblvd I think your proposal is just trying to polish a turd to be honest. This entire statist system needs to be scrapped because its not working
The only deal Id be interested in is one where taxes are reduced to 0% for everyone, and anyone who has stolen money or assets returns them to their rightful owners and additionally pays damages. We want to rid out society of parasitic behaviour...Give it no quarter....and make no distinction between a rich parasite and a poor parasite
@elfornse Nobody pays any taxes. Brilliant. Who needs roads, bridges, police, fire departments, clean air, water, safe food, military, or anything like that? We will just live in a country where everything is privately owned. Of course, your bills for these things might just go up a wee, tiny lil'o bit because with private ownership comes a profit margin where you will have to pay the salaries of CFOs, CEOs, mid-managent, & dividends to shareholders. cont.....
@elfornse And, if we are dissatisfied with the corporation that owns the roads, why, we can just build our own roads. That's the free market, right? If we are disatisfied with how our privatized police force enforces the law, we can just start our own police force, right? As long as nobody has to pay EVIL TAXES!!!
Don't forget that there are no laws, because that would be a function of government as well. Instead, the corporate police will arrest you for violating "company policy" which is whatever the hell they want it to be, and then send you to their forced labor camps where you'll work as a slave for the rest of your life. A fascist government in everything but name.
Living in a country that is kept stable by services (including the military) that are paid for by taxes, without paying your fair share into those services is theft. You've got it backwards. If you don't like paying for the services that keep this country a stable society, then go move to your libertarian utopia of Somalia.
You think endless wars and threatening WW3 with Iran is stable?
You thank financial meltdowns and banker bailouts are stable?
At this rate, the only thing that will be stable in the future is the cardboard box we will be sleeping on each night thanks to people like you who cheerlead this criminal organization called government
And why would I move to Somalia? The murderous US Government is all over that place like a fat kid on a cupcake
Yes, the country has its problems, but it's definitely in better shape than the anarchy you propose. That said, the dept is largely the fault of tax breaks for the rich along with the endless wars (which are an excuse to give contractors more money). The financial meltdown are a result of a lack of governmental control (the exact same thing happened in the 20's when we let leverage get out of control).
@Onithyr Lets check back in 5 or 10 years and we'll see if you're still happy about the "shape" the US is in
As for a stateless society, I don't see how you can comment on its "shape" when it doesn't even exist
How can you use Somalia as an example of a stateless society when the US Government is creating warlords, killing people and setting up tax systems over there? Get the US military out of there completely and give them 10 or 20 years and Id bet you they'd be in "better shape" than the US
Yes, I'm already aware that the US is headed in a bad direction, I'm just aware enough of how the world works to know that your direction is far FAR worse.
"it doesn't even exist"
EXACTLY! It can't exist, because your ideals do not lead to a stable society. Finally you've said something correct.
fuck her and tiger i got a name for their life story dumb and dumber 3
diamlierx 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
she's come from not rich tiger's for money... she just doing that for tiger coz she n tiger live there almost 2 years that's way... she marryd for money. he'd give so much money for her... this people r sick really really is........................... if tiger is white he can kip kids with hem he can take care of. in this country just like that really is. :(
TheDaily365 3 weeks ago
she's come from not rich tiger's money... she just doing that for tiger coz she n tiger live there almost 2 year that's way... she marryd money. he'd give so much money for her... this people r sick really really is........................... if tiger is white he can kip kids with hem he can take care of. in this country just like that really is. :(
TheDaily365 3 weeks ago
These two can not speak to save their lives. I hope to never see another video of these desparate losers.
keuter04 4 weeks ago
seinfeild did the same thing in the hamptins and many other celebs too, only they worked for their money
bulletproof2353 1 month ago
She's the scum of the earth. To think the majority of people on earth live in makeshift shelters and this BITCH is not satisfied with a massive mansion so much so that she bulldozes it and builds a new one is disgusting.
vince225566 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
As far as I can see at least she is creating more jobs. She tearing down the old house and probably going to build a mega plaza to replace it. I guess their is nothing wrong with that. At least she spending here money on something to help the economy rebound.
To bad no one else will ever live in tiger woods old mega house, oh well.
WaterFish22 1 month ago
@trentWHY I know, it must be terrible. Could have been avoided if you just answered my question but nope! :)
LoveVampire 1 month ago
God, some times I wish I were a beautiful woman, rather than an average-looking man, so that I could marry a rich man and get a huge divorce-settlement XD
SkullOfYorick 1 month ago
To be honest if i'd all that money I'd buy a Lamborghini and probably another Lamborghini just so I'd have one to drive and one to admire and think how pretty. Probably build a big ass house to.
And have big gates to keep the government from taking my money. Scratch that last part I'll just buy a politician and have him make me more money.
JamesAColemanFan 1 month ago
according to anna's numbers, 50 million x 2 dollar whores = 100 million dollar settlement
MaggieRoara 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That woman can't seem to find good "wood" anywhere.
Danimal102306 1 month ago
SOON SHE'LL BEGGING FOR ONE DOLLAR THAT WHORE.
SCORPION1720 1 month ago
FUCK SWEDISH PEOPLE.
SCORPION1720 1 month ago
theres is a newspaper in sweden called AFTONBLADET they adore what she did.
THAT LITTLE BITCH ELIN NORDGREN.
swedish people are so stupid you can do whatever you like with them.
SCORPION1720 1 month ago
I bet she did this because Tiger stuck his penis in that girls vagina...
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
I was under the impression that house had an infestation problem they tried to solve first but couldn't.
bluumberry 1 month ago
TYT has gotten soo shit now stop being such overly opinionated bastards how is this more important than all the other things in the news. Also Fuck you Cenk and Ana
rynb93 1 month ago
@rynb93 oh gawd this pisses me off so much its her money if she wants roll it up and shove it in her ass she can! also taxing wont take it all it is HER money so yaa the rich should be taxed but ye shud come off yer high horse and lose some weight
rynb93 1 month ago
There's all kinds of suffering in the world. People are homeless, hungry, dying of disease. You could help them with your fantastic excess wealth. Or, spend a couple million dollars to tear down a perfectly good mansion and build it over again. Like Cenk said, tax the rich. I now have no sympathy for her, either.
TheGiantRobot 1 month ago 3
Idk about this one. It's not like Elin's hurting anyone or screwing the rest of us out of anyone, so why not let her do what she wants with her money? I bet she has something particular in mind she wants to do with the property, possibly something really cool.
TheCreeperhunter 1 month ago
@TheCreeperhunter People dislike this bitch because she never earned a penny of the 500 million she got from Tiger.
afk0306 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@afk0306 And Tiger did 'earn' the money by hitting a ball around with a club?
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@afk0306 Oh okay. I guess I just never payed much attention to that particular divorce, or any celebrity divorce for that matter. Never really cared.
TheCreeperhunter 1 month ago
TERMITES people TERMITES !!! Elin wasn't such a bitch after all ( she even offered habitat for humanity to take whatever they wanted for a month. Nice gesture.).
MistahWagwan 1 month ago 2
So...she takes her money. Decides where she wants to live, wants to design it to her own tastes most likely for the long term (a house she can die in and have no regrets) so she creates jobs by destroying it, and then by designing and building a new one?
I'm not suggesting I don't agree with the "tax the rich" sentiment, but this is not a supporting argument. She is actually SPENDING her money, not hiding it in a hole and being destructive with it. I wish ALL the rich did as she is doing.
MARTIN0641 1 month ago
Is that a rhetorical question? If they did pay the same rates as the rest of the 'bottom' there'd be no crisis certainly!
4youLola 1 month ago
It's her $; she spends it like she wants to. It's not unusual for ppl with money to spend it.The English castles, Biltmore, etc. It's all relative. In fact, most ppl spend in line with their income.
LadySePe 1 month ago
IS IT ME OR DO I HEAR VOICES COMING FROM SOMEWHERE IN THE STUDIO
convener777 1 month ago
@convener777 just calm down and take these pills.
weeman26 1 month ago
Housewhifes usualy fuck their hustband for the money. Or mooch of him after a divorce.
Liqtor 1 month ago
tax the rich...
nory826 1 month ago
she just wanted a bigger kitchen
ogokafor 1 month ago
How many women...?" Ana is so pissed...
nsx1com 1 month ago
Tax the bitch, I mean, the rich.
YAHSHARAL 1 month ago 69
Their arguments are extremely silly. Take an issue like pollution. The free market solution to a company polluting is to show your disapproval by buying from another company. First off, in a country without govt watchdogs how the hell is anyone to know? Second, often times you can't buy from another company ie. there's only one electric company that services my area, if they're doing something wrong I'm not able to switch. And 3rd if no ones telling them not too they'll generally all do it.
senortonyful 1 month ago 10
And no, history shows that whenever radical free market economics are implemented the middle class DOES degrade, as well as further impoverishment of the poor. Friedman was probably the poorest example you could give. The idea that the "market" takes care of all is a falsehood. If you're willing to discuss this I'd be glad to go into detail.
senortonyful 1 month ago
@senortonyful You're soooooo right! Free market economics with zero regulation is inherently flawed because it assumes that people are going to always "do the right thing". However, in no other field would you even THINK of not having rules and regulations. You wouldn't raise children w/o rules. You wouldn't run a hospital w/o regulations. Why on EARTH would it make sense to run an entire economy without rules and regulations?! Conservatives trip me out with that nonsense!
nmryda 1 month ago
Where's the trickle? The fact is that nearly every economic system has been tried at one point in time or another. Friedman had his experiment in Chile and drove the country past the brink of disaster. The same free market nonsense was tried in post-Soviet Russia and failed miserably. A perfect example would be the last U.S tax holiday. Tax-free money flooded U.S corps, they still cut jobs. A company can have all the money in the world and they're not going to create jobs unless someones buying.
senortonyful 1 month ago
@trentWHY Says the person who is 'wasting their time' replying to my messages. You poor thing.
LoveVampire 1 month ago
@Wangnarok
I do think the rich should be taxed a fair amount like everyone else. I do agree though that the rich are not obligated to be charitable and spend wisely, and shouldn't be taxed just because they have extra dollars. However, the rich aren't total victims...they have a history of buying favors from politicians, that exploit the rest of us. Plus with tax funded subsidies and bailouts, they don't hurt all that much either. But for what you say, it is true.
raspberrymuffin 1 month ago
she is a job creator
hollywoodjokerpicalo 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 70
There are two passages in Proverbs that speak directly of the issue of greed and
the lust for money. Proverbs 15:27 says 27 He who is greedy for gain troubles his own house… Proverbs 27:20 says
20 Hell and Destruction are never full; So the eyes of man are never satisfied. The biggest problem with having a
lot of wealth is that you never seem to get enough. Horace once said “As riches grow, care follows, and a thirst for
more and more.” Proverbs 23:4 says 4 Do not overwork to be rich…
Budvb 1 month ago
lol anyone who bought a 12 million dollar house and only 2 people live in it all year. I'm sorry got ripped off, and i hope they enjoy cleaning, heating and taking care of something you will never enjoy.
Budvb 1 month ago
@Budvb That's what hiring immigrants is for! They do all the work! (Sarcasm mode.)
Otokogoroshi 1 month ago
@Otokogoroshi That costs money too, I guess I'm just a Simple man that enjoys simple things. Makes it so I don't have to slave too hard for the Rich then too. Much easier way of living in my opinion. Rich people and all that money are not happy, and this proves all that Money don't bring happiness or allows them to enjoy life any better then I.
Budvb 1 month ago
@Otokogoroshi Lynyrd Skynyrd - Simple Man <~~~~ all i can say words of wisdom, free here on Youtube.
Budvb 1 month ago
@trentWHY Sure and you can keep avoiding a argument since you have a pea-brain. :)
LoveVampire 1 month ago
I think it might be the fact they would not buy anything second hand and if the house has been lived in it second hand.
Avatarfan10000 1 month ago
100 million settlement for sleeping with 50 million women... hmm 2$ per woman is not bad at all...
zeus018 1 month ago
@Wangnarok That's true, what you are seeing in these comments are people's true colors shining through. On a psychological level, some people simply cannot stand others having more than them. Its sends them into an almost murderous rage. Such people are quite frequent TYT's channel and Cenk is definitely one of them. Their sense of envy, and jealousy is so overwhelming that they have to fleece the rich guy at any cost. Coming up with some bullshit "I care about the poor" story is just a facade
elfornse 1 month ago
Even if im a swed but i think Elins is brigheter then you give here Credit for, think se can se a good deal in this propery, buy in for 12, get rid of the shabby house and then buld a new on, in the end she will spend about 20 miljon but hawe a house worth a bit more then that.
anoger 1 month ago
"It's not a problem to have money. It's a problem to be an ass with your money."
One of my new favorite quotes lol
Taizen001 1 month ago
Pre-nup, guys. Pre-nup.
TheCagedTiger 1 month ago
Did Anna really just use the word "bourgie"?
liberationn15 1 month ago
if you have the money, why not spend it?
toritwinkle 1 month ago
@trentWHY Uhhh no, it just proves that you can't give a decent reply because you're avoiding it like the plague.
LoveVampire 1 month ago
Well, Well, Well. Look at these dumbasses. This is all they got. I thought this was supposed to be entertainment. Now, Cenk where is the joke about how Tiger did those women, the sinful shit you normally say? Also, why has Ana suddenly started reporting real stories like the whole deportation story as this was one of the few of the "entertainment" stories the whole week. The answer is that we have finally gotten to these assholes. Just wait, the sinful Wolf-PAC is going as well. Take that.
jatt5at 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This is why we need to TAX THE HELL out of the rich!
TheEmpowered787 1 month ago
What a fucking Golddigger. She doesn't deserve shit.
GenTsoChicken1 1 month ago in playlist TYT
@GenTsoChicken1 Well she did subject herself to Tiger's over used, disease ridden dick. That's gotta be worth something.
metalsusa1 1 month ago
@metalsusa1 Minimum wage. The most.
GenTsoChicken1 1 month ago
That what I say too ! Tax the rich why poor kids go hungry.
sonofatiger 1 month ago
I would like to ask her some questions when she runs out of money in about a year. That will be funny :)
SIC66SIC66 1 month ago
Bwahahahahahah, xD
.
What a dumb fucking bitch, she probably had her period of the month and got an urge to make a point about something she could take up in the kitchen.
.
Christian tradition clearly shows women are irresponsible and should never have control over property and capital.
Giving women right to administer property and inheritance in the 1800s was a communist-Muslim-environmentalist plot.
underbjorn 1 month ago
The author of the newsletters have been uncovered. It wasn't Ron Paul
atkinsoniv 1 month ago
Anna doesn't know anything about this one. In palm beach (the richest zip code in the country) that is not just common but it is the only thing done with those mansions. You do not buy a mansion in palm beach to live in you buy it to tear it down and build a different one. That is all. You would never see someone buy a house there and just move in. Unless it is historic like maralago or something and you legally cannot tear it down.
PaddyCollector 1 month ago
WTF, that house was built in 1932 and it's right on the beach. Restoration work is usually much more expensive than rebuilding.
Get a f*ing life and stop flapping your gums unless you know the whole story.
The lady will probably make a profit if she decides to sell her new home.
BTW, it's HER money (not Tyger's).
hyperboreean 1 month ago
Oh, come on Cenk! This lady is employing people in the construction industry, the industry that was hardest hit by the recession. This is a case of egregious job creation, and Tiger Woods' money is going to the middle and lower classes to build the new mansion. It's awesome!
tnordloh 1 month ago
I hope you realize that I was making a joke. I am a poor person. The shed was literally falling down and I still used as much of the lumber from it as a could. Apparently any time someone makes a joke on youtube they have to write out "just joking" or people freak out.
senortonyful 1 month ago
Comment removed
kileer7 1 month ago
@kileer7 Is it "woman's scorn" or "woman scorned"? I never could tell.
senortonyful 1 month ago
why not just donate the money to people who need it.. $12,000,000 could save a lot of kids lives
ilightbite 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jewish Republican Coalition didn't invite Ron Paul to its debate because Ron Paul refuses to send Americans to war & death for Israel
Vote Ron Paul.
Stevie68000 1 month ago
Hell, yes. We should definitely raise taxes on the rich.
dlunas81 1 month ago
Eat the rich
Shiggedy 1 month ago
Hey now, listen, shes a JOB CREATOR. Imagine all the mexicans she needs to hire in order to get that job done! (I'm kidding)
J3yblivion 1 month ago
Rich bitches be CRA-ZY.
ogrish84 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 37
@ogrish84 no all bitches are crazy. she just has the money to show it.
hollywoodjokerpicalo 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Taxing the rich isn't going to solve anything! You need to balance the budget by cutting spending.
Cut the military budget and the social programs. Just creating more revenue by taking more money out of the private sector and killing millions of jobs isn't really going to solve ANYTHING!
Please get it through your head TYT not all rich people work for Goldman Sachs and other speculative corporations most rich people are owners of producing business which we need to grow the economy.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 I respectfully disagree, the rich need to be taxed more in order to get more revenue in. Also i definitely think we should balance the budget by cutting the military drastically and cutting some social programs.
TrueTacticia 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheYoungTurks
@antonio3p1
The need for jobs will only come from demand. If workers pay more taxes they will purchase less goods and services. A portion of the tax burden was lightened for the rich on the false premise that they would reinvest excess capital in commodities and services rather than gamble in the casino houses of equity markets.
In other words:
PAYING PEOPLE TO CREATE JOBS THEIR IS NO MARKET FOR IS FUCKING RETARDED. TAX THE RICH.
TruthDevours 1 month ago
@TruthDevours We're not paying them. We're just letting them keep their money.
By the way I think you lack understanding of the capitalistic economic model. It works for 1000 people and it will also work for 7 billion people for that matter. What I'm saying is that there's nothing wrong with the economic model and there's nothing wrong with letting rich people keep their money. The economy is so bad not because of free markets but because of government interference. Learn Austrian Economics.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 The economy collapsed because we don't check on what the company's are doing. A few months ago a Belgian bank was about to collapse, after it was saved by the French and Belgian governments we found out they had over 3 times the bnp of the entire country of Belgium in derivative bets with money they don't have. The collapse of that bank would have killed Belgium and taken down the entire EU in one big domino event. I say fuck capitalism is it leads to this.
Helghastl33t 1 month ago
@Helghastl33t No capitalism doesn't lead to this.
What leads to this is the Federal Reserve giving out interest free loans and the government bailling them out whenever they make a mistake or fail.
If it wasn't for that terrible economic enviroment created by the federal government banks and other speculative corporations wouldn't focus so much on the derivatives business because they know that they would actually FAIL if they did it.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@antonio3p1
"What I'm saying is that there's nothing wrong with the economic model and there's nothing wrong with letting rich people keep their money."
This response is laughable. You have addressed NOTHING. Fuck Austrian Economics. Try learning *basic* economics. I'll say it again:
PAYING PEOPLE TO CREATE JOBS *THERE IS NO MARKET FOR IS FUCKING RETARDED. TAX THE RICH.
Now...please address this point, or kindly STFU.
TruthDevours 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 You've made an assumption that taxing the rich is going to kill jobs. Fortunately that theory doesn't pan out. What does create jobs is putting money INTO the poor and middle class ie. redistributive tax policies, social programs. Then you've created a demand. The rich end up with the money anyways (the poor/middle spend it all ) it's just that everyone else gets something for the money in the mean also. Cutting taxes on business if no ones buying helps nothing.
senortonyful 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@senortonyful ---
"You've made an assumption that taxing the rich is going to kill jobs. Fortunately that theory doesn't pan out."
.
It's not even a theory, it's just a nonsensical slogan founded on no theoretical basis whatsoever.
underbjorn 1 month ago
@senortonyful Well that theory first of all is socialism which doesn't work for several reasons. One is economic another is also morals which I do not have time to explain in a youtube comment. I suggest you read some Milton Friedman books.
Your theory says that there is no such thing as trickle-down economics, which is not true. The middle class will still be there even without wealth distribution.
Also giving people an income for doing nothing is such a bad idea.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 " that theory first of all is socialism which doesn't work"--It must be nice seeing the world in black and white, as if there are any actual examples of a purely socialist or capitalist economy in the world. Your comment is so broad as to be utterly meaningless.
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@SupermarketsRevil No but whenever we've been closest to capitalism we've been the most succesful and the most free.
When we have been closest to socialism as we are now we have been poor and our civil liberties have been taking away, our wars have expanded and our endless wasteful spending has aswell.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 "whenever we've been closest to capitalism we've been the most succesful &the most free"-- This whole 'closer to X' phrase is a waste of bandwidth. Be specific in what you are talking about. Yes, free (but regulated) markets have been very beneficial to economic growth. So has taxation which leads to investment in infrastructure, education &research.
"When we have been closest to socialism as we are now"--Who is 'we'? Nations like Germany have 'socialist' policies & are successful.
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@SupermarketsRevil Germany is not succesful. They might be doing better than a lot of other people but they still have massive debt.
Through the American "golden age" period we have low taxes, almost no regulations and a small decentralized government which almost did nothing, and that was the time were we had the BIGGEST middle class the world had ever seen and the most prosperity.
Now we are poor, uneducated, have a massive national debt and we're nationbuilding for our empire.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 At present we are seeing relatively higher tax rates for the middle class and lower tax rates for the most wealthy. Financial disparity in the US is increasing dramatically and it is becoming more and more difficult for the middle class to live comfortably. During many periods of US economic growth through the 20th century, tax rates were significantly higher than they are today.
American infrastructure is crumbling as its bought and paid for politicians funnel money to the wealthy
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@SupermarketsRevil During most of US tax rate history we didn't have a federal income tax at all. So don't argument doesn't hold any ground.
You complain about too high tax rates for the middle and lower class. Well how about we just have low tax rates for everybody. Stop the welfare system which doesn't work. Stop the warfare and stop trying to spread "democracy" around the world and mind our own business.
If we did that things would be much better.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 There is a reason I specified economic growth in the 20th century; clearly it is a different macroeconomic environment when there is no national income tax.
"You complain about too high tax rates for the middle and lower class"--No, I'm complaining about financial disparity. A given tax rate may be more or less justifiable depending on what the government provides in return.
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@SupermarketsRevil Financial disparity is not going to be fixed through high taxes. Quite the contrary actually. Look at India. For decades they had a central planned economy and a lot of hand outs to the poor but none of that helped and their misery continued but when they got rid of that and adopted a free market system they got richer and more prosperous.
Low taxes, getting rid of regulations and no government interference is the way to go if you want what's best for the poor.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 Because a nation like India has comparable demographics and economy to the US -__- Of course free markets are beneficial. the question is what regulation is needed. We've all seen what happens when there is too little regulation; competition dries up and is replaced by a small handful of multinationals who seek to maximise short term gain at the expense of the general public. In fascist police states like the US they even get taxpayer funded bailouts as a reward for this theft.
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@SupermarketsRevil No it's very simple alll over the world you can see the same results. In economies with centralized planning the economy is bad at adopting and transforming whenever the demand changes or other events that might disrupt the market occur.
Also throughout American and world history whenever big corporations have become too big too fail is when their markets were regulated and government was too big and therefor also corrupt.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 "throughout American and world history whenever big corporations have become too big too fail is when their markets were regulated"--This is demonstrably fallacious. The big four banks in Australia have not merged solely because of regulation. The leaders of these firms express a desire to merge their businesses, obviously so that their is reduced competition.
You don't seem to understand the distinction between regulated free markets and a centralised economy.
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@SupermarketsRevil So what was the government supposed to do? Force those banks not to merge? No that would give government too much power and therefor increase lobbying.
The problem in Australia will be fixed in a couple of years by competition. Other banks with rise and force the four big merging banks to lower their prices in order to stay competitive. I'm sorry but the whole socialistic idea that big corporations will rule everything in a free market is not true.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 "So what was the government supposed to do? Force those banks not to merge?"--Yes, and that is what they have done and are doing.
By making this obvious implication that you think such regulation is bad you either think 1) more competition is bad (which I'll assume you don't agree with) or 2) More mergers of financial institutions/fewer competitors is going to increase competition.
The reality is that corporations do rule in the US, and they are anti-competition/free markets
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@SupermarketsRevil No I don't think more competition is bad but your idea that competition will not merge again after a few years is not true.
Also it's called freedom. We can't allow freedom and then prohibit it somewhere else as long as they aren't stealing, commiting fraud or violating any other law.
If they want to merge let them merge. If they raise prices to much watch other banks form and steal their customers. It's that simple. It's called competition.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 that fine but then dont bail them out either, and thats what created the problem the banks lobbied and put their people in the government to deregulate, they go back and forth from government to the banks and corporation, we have fascism here,its the merger of state and corporate power ,no they should never have been allowed to be in ght government in the 1st place ,and should not have been able to use their influence to repeal glass stegal act,and the rest of the deregulation
bulletproof2353 1 month ago
@bulletproof2353 Those regulatory bureaucracies are just going to get lobbied by the fortune 400 corporations in order to make their own regulations and kill competition. All you can do is minimize the government and enforce private property laws and prosecute banks who commit fraud. The problem is all the politicians are bought and corrupted but they wouldn't be so corrupt if government had less power, simply because the fortune 400 corporations wouldn't lobby as they do now
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 Excuse me, I am Indian, i don't know where you're getting your info from, but gvmt never gave "hand outs" to the poor. People are poor is because of growing population & corruption. People are poor because of lack of jobs & opportunities. People are poor because of lack of investment in education vs opportunities for middle class & rich. CONTINUED....
Stingerbillion 1 month ago
@Stingerbillion No India had a huged centralized economy a few decades ago you should check up on your facts and it was first when government let the market roam more freely thing became better. Now the poor might not be doing as well as they could but they are certainly better off now compared to the past.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 You are telling me i don't know my country? I grew up there! I follow every news that happens. I would like to know which sites you get your information from because clearly you don't know shit about India. You are right about one thing and that's India has opened up it's market for jobs investment. Please don't use "free market", there is no such thing today. Every country has capitalism, India certainly has embraced it thanks to work of Manmohan Singh (PM). CONTINUED...
Stingerbillion 1 month ago
@Stingerbillion Just search Milton Friedman on youtube. Watch his debates especially those were he debats against socialist and kicks their ass.
Ron Paul 2012
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 You're out of your mind if you think i will waste my time by listening to Republican spread lies and failed policies on what is needed in this country or not.
Stingerbillion 1 month ago
@Stingerbillion Well then keep being ignorant and keep listening to the establishment you sheep. One day you will live in tyranny if you don't wake up.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
@Stingerbillion the problem is that the government regulation is not working ,the government dont regulate the big corporations and banks, it uses the money it gets from them,and you to regulate the little guy out of existence with regulation that the big corporations never have to abide by cause they paid to put it them place the government is nothing more than the enforcer for the big elite banking and corporate cartels and it dont help that those same interests also own the media TOTALLY
bulletproof2353 1 month ago
@bulletproof2353 so there is no media it is corporate state run propaganda its just like north korea ,an none of there corporate GOP or democrat puppets will ever fix it,there all OWNED and so are you
bulletproof2353 1 month ago
Comment removed
Stingerbillion 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 CONTINUED...Less regulations is why buildings are crumbling in India. Less regulation is what caused bridge to collaspe in New Dehli in 2010. Different religions, caste systems, different ethnics. Less regulations is why companies are free to pollute in water ways. Today more people are demanding more regulations and crack on corrupted officials. You don't know what the hell you are talking about!
Stingerbillion 1 month ago
@Stingerbillion If you think that companies are allowed to pollute because of the lack of regulation then you're crazy. That's not why they are. In India there are probably government regulations against polution, but because the government regulators have been bought up by corporations those laws and regulations don't apply to the people that have bought goverment only to the people who haven't and thus killing off competition. It's called fascism you know.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
Comment removed
Stingerbillion 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@antonio3p1 CONTINUED....I am sure you are a nice person, but to spread false info about how regulations & public education don't work is absolutely bullshit. It's people like you who are bad for this country & many other nations about the world. Regulations are desperately needed in this country if it wants to have a future. You should apply at Goldman Sachs, i am sure they are hiring people like you. You will make millions spreading lies.
Stingerbillion 1 month ago
@antonio3p1 " Stop the welfare system which doesn't work"--I agree. At the moment the US is doing a reverse robin hood; stealing from the poor and giving to the rich, corporate socialism. There should be no such thing as too big to fail. Perhaps if the US gov't invested in education, infrastructure and industry instead of giving more morally repulsive subsidies to the most wealthy citizens and corporations then it's citizens might actually have the chance to live comfortably.
SupermarketsRevil 1 month ago
@SupermarketsRevil I agree, subsidizing any business and giving them a unatural advantage is wrong.
Public education has always been bad. It's wasteful, it's full of bureaucracy and most importantly to know is that it's full of government propaganda such as pro interventionist foreign policy and keynesian economics.
So public education is a bad thing and we shouldn't invest in that.
Infrastructure is something I can deal with but even that can be handled better by the private market.
antonio3p1 1 month ago
divorce is so fucking idiotic, why again does she get the money from him?
TheLazyAngel89 1 month ago
Tax the Rich? More like "Ax the Bitch".
marcetclaude 1 month ago
Okay, so she's a crazy rich-ass bitch. Fair enough. Should the rich be taxed more? Absolutely.
However, through her tearing down a home and creating a new one, she totally created business maybe a couple jobs as well. From construction contractors to lumber companies to architects, this act of bitchery helped slightly stimulate the economy. Probably among the few rare cases that "trickle down economics" can be verified as legitimately occasionally, though not often, happening.
iKickComputers 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheYoungTurks
She refused to date Tiger Woods 2 times before she agreed to see him. Her family was already well off, She isn't a Gold Digger and she had his kids.
If the fucking dumbass wanted to fuck many women....why did he get married??
She created jobs....good for her. It was her money.
Personally, I stay in Sweden.
daguzify 1 month ago
Maybe that's why tiger was cheating on her crazy ass
woodyfly 1 month ago
Guess that project kept the unemployment numbers down for awhile. Lots of sales taxes for the local area and money into the suppliers and their sources. A flat tax or just a sales tax and no income taxes. Good or bad. What good is all that money if it isn't being spent.
coal4life 1 month ago
Once again, Ana is not prepared. She is always blowing it. This time she calls it NORTH PALM BEACH, FL. For fuck's sake. That place doesn't even exist! Doesn't Cenk read her the riot act? Ana, get it together.
eqsmooth 1 month ago
Tax the rich!
SrRulao 1 month ago 82
And this is why we should tax the rich.
Zackerybob 1 month ago
this is what money will do to you
jwdesign336 1 month ago
*HEADDESK*
Kurotaka 1 month ago
Her money, she has every right to what the fuck she wants with it. Next video...
FunnyRandomShitLoL 1 month ago
@FunnyRandomShitLoL not her money tigers money, shes a women she took it and stole it. fuck off
rubixcubesolve 1 month ago
@rubixcubesolve she's a woman and she stole it ? Oh no, but she took it first. LOL !
FunnyRandomShitLoL 1 month ago
I think this is AWESOME! She is creating jobs! about time someone does.... All rich people should do this.
Stop telling low class to buy, tell the rich people to buy buy buy
Gr4yW0rld 1 month ago
Admired!!!
walk4trot2canter3 1 month ago
So she married a rich bad man who cheated on her and gets $10 million. Get locked up in prison for 10 years before you prove your innocence & you get how much? There is way way way too much money in divorce settlements at every level from the super rich to the poor. The guy was a cock, was he $10 million worth of a cock? No. With the law as it stands and divorce rates as they stand, you have to be a complete fool to be a man and get married. If marriage improves society, we need to fix this.
William00048 1 month ago
We don't really know if the house was in great condition. Maybe she liked the place but the house had foundations problems and needed to be demolished. Have you seen her house in Sweden? It's really no big deal. She is never been a person with an extravagant personality and taste.
SilentedSpirit 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
She could've at least made that money useful and donated it to a charity.
Saaduk92 1 month ago
@Saaduk92 Most "charities" shave off 80 cents on every dollar for "administrative costs". She'd be better off volunteering. You are too concerned with money.
callouschristian 1 month ago
@callouschristian
...and several don't take any money.
Saaduk92 1 month ago
Tax the rich ....republican are pure losers
jewel360x 1 month ago
Swedish women are NOT like American women ..
She brougt it for the land probley wanna build her own dreamhouse child proof
Most Swed´s stay friends after divorse ..for the sake of the children..
THAT`S THE SWEDISH MENTALETY
TTiger Wood payed Russian Roulette with Elins life having sex without condome with 100s of girls..There´s still golfers friends of both who reufuse to speak to Tiger Woods
MissMelodia4U 1 month ago
why does this whore get tigers money?
hash1212121212 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@hash1212121212 Because she's smart and he's an idiot. It's your own fault for not raising your voice when a yahoo gets billions for hitting a ball into a hole.
callouschristian 1 month ago
@callouschristian
He gets billions of dollars because he sells billions in product with his name attached to it. What does she do? Divorce law is bullshit.
hash1212121212 1 month ago
Yes raise them
MsGoddessAkasha 1 month ago
@trentWHY Sure ya do.
LoveVampire 1 month ago
all while little children starve all over the world. FUCK U. Even if i had a billion dollars i would never fucking do that. BIIIIITCCCCHHH!
elmirasahar 1 month ago
Its funny how in 10 years that $100,000,000 is going to -$50,000,000. When you get that much money without knowing the actual hard ship one has to go through to achieve that much, you just spend, spend and before you know it its GONE.
if you have $100,000,000. Automatically $50,000,000 should be invested in various property's, business etc etc etc etc. Not pay $12,000,000 fucken million on a house.
rapandrnb 1 month ago
@elfornse Alright. Let's make a deal. I won't ask Tiger Woods to pay an additonal 4% on his adjusted earned income above $350,000, but don't you dare bitch about the economy when the top 1% is paying the lowest tax rates in 50 years. And your republo-libetarian friends don't try to fucking take away the social security & the safety net programs that I, my family & other taxpayers have already paid into. Deal?
schillerblvd 1 month ago
@schillerblvd I think your proposal is just trying to polish a turd to be honest. This entire statist system needs to be scrapped because its not working
The only deal Id be interested in is one where taxes are reduced to 0% for everyone, and anyone who has stolen money or assets returns them to their rightful owners and additionally pays damages. We want to rid out society of parasitic behaviour...Give it no quarter....and make no distinction between a rich parasite and a poor parasite
elfornse 1 month ago
@elfornse
You haven't answered my question, elfornse. Should the violent criminal simply be set free or not?
Onithyr 1 month ago
@elfornse Nobody pays any taxes. Brilliant. Who needs roads, bridges, police, fire departments, clean air, water, safe food, military, or anything like that? We will just live in a country where everything is privately owned. Of course, your bills for these things might just go up a wee, tiny lil'o bit because with private ownership comes a profit margin where you will have to pay the salaries of CFOs, CEOs, mid-managent, & dividends to shareholders. cont.....
schillerblvd 1 month ago
@elfornse And, if we are dissatisfied with the corporation that owns the roads, why, we can just build our own roads. That's the free market, right? If we are disatisfied with how our privatized police force enforces the law, we can just start our own police force, right? As long as nobody has to pay EVIL TAXES!!!
schillerblvd 1 month ago
@schillerblvd
Don't forget that there are no laws, because that would be a function of government as well. Instead, the corporate police will arrest you for violating "company policy" which is whatever the hell they want it to be, and then send you to their forced labor camps where you'll work as a slave for the rest of your life. A fascist government in everything but name.
Onithyr 1 month ago
@Onithyr The infantile are ripe for fascism.
schillerblvd 1 month ago
I thought this was from the onion before I clicked on it.
thabithskit 1 month ago
@trentWHY Because you don't have a good argument to justify it.
LoveVampire 1 month ago
Tax these assholes. Hit them where it hurts: their wallet.
Miranox2 1 month ago
@elfornse
Living in a country that is kept stable by services (including the military) that are paid for by taxes, without paying your fair share into those services is theft. You've got it backwards. If you don't like paying for the services that keep this country a stable society, then go move to your libertarian utopia of Somalia.
Onithyr 1 month ago
@Onithyr
You think a $16 Trillion Dollar debt is stable?
You think endless wars and threatening WW3 with Iran is stable?
You thank financial meltdowns and banker bailouts are stable?
At this rate, the only thing that will be stable in the future is the cardboard box we will be sleeping on each night thanks to people like you who cheerlead this criminal organization called government
And why would I move to Somalia? The murderous US Government is all over that place like a fat kid on a cupcake
elfornse 1 month ago
@elfornse
Yes, the country has its problems, but it's definitely in better shape than the anarchy you propose. That said, the dept is largely the fault of tax breaks for the rich along with the endless wars (which are an excuse to give contractors more money). The financial meltdown are a result of a lack of governmental control (the exact same thing happened in the 20's when we let leverage get out of control).
Onithyr 1 month ago
@Onithyr Lets check back in 5 or 10 years and we'll see if you're still happy about the "shape" the US is in
As for a stateless society, I don't see how you can comment on its "shape" when it doesn't even exist
How can you use Somalia as an example of a stateless society when the US Government is creating warlords, killing people and setting up tax systems over there? Get the US military out of there completely and give them 10 or 20 years and Id bet you they'd be in "better shape" than the US
elfornse 1 month ago
@elfornse
Yes, I'm already aware that the US is headed in a bad direction, I'm just aware enough of how the world works to know that your direction is far FAR worse.
"it doesn't even exist"
EXACTLY! It can't exist, because your ideals do not lead to a stable society. Finally you've said something correct.
Onithyr 1 month ago