How come there is always an "obvious" violation when an explosion, fire , death of a person(s) is OBVIOUS ?? What happens when the violations are subtle... and are just "potential and could occur" scenarios.... For example, inhalation of substances used in the work place from workmen doing remodeling...and using toxic, flammable , potentially poisonous chemicals, glues, paints that put all the public in that building at risk of an explosion, fire, over-exposure to fumes??? They are just as bad
How come there is always an "obvious" violation when an explosion, fire , death of a person(s) is OBVIOUS ?? What happens when the violations are subtle... and are just "potential and could occur" scenarios.... For example, inhalation of substances used in the work place from workmen doing remodeling...and using toxic, flammable , potentially poisonous chemicals, glues, paints that put all the public in that building at risk of an explosion, fire, over-exposure to fumes??? They are just as bad
WmRios 1 year ago
This is an excellent summary of the incident and appropriate comments on the issue of OSHA standards applied to non covered workforces. Well Done!
Are you aware of a series of OSHA standards on video on "youtube" for all to see?
racovert 2 years ago
You can't legislate intelligence, unfortunately.
themanyone 3 years ago