Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (98)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • kinky1989568 moderchod,randy ka bacha,

  • tendulkar scores so many runs because he uses a fat bat. If even andy bichel had used such a fat bat he would have scored more runs than him.

  • @kinky1989568 Your an idiot,

  • ha ha i love the shot played against donald.look how he he whips the ball so casually like he just wants to dismiss it from his presenc and not really hit it. so casual.brilliant

  • some illusion is also.i speculate, created by the fact that speed is always relative.

    and for the claim modern batsman are not good enough because of helmets an protective quipments..thats just childish.equipments immune you from injury they may cut your career short but you never start playing better because of them.its just not possible. i speak this from common sense and practical experience. i hav played crucket with proper leather ball in very pitches with nothing, not even pads.

  • and plus its not logical that todays fast bowlers are not so speedy as of past. cmon benaud ven tase tyson was the speediest bowler he ever saw.no doubt its because he is even older than others. how can todays bowlers suddenyl got slower? is it something to do with the fact that athletes in all sports are getting faster or that human beings have generally increased in height?

    also compare this pathetic tendency with the comments of pele who says he was the best ever!!

  • the myth of super speed of 80 fast bowlers is no doubt perpetuated by the fact that the commentratos of today who mainly played during that era are nostalgic of that time.its hard for them to accept those days are not the best. i mean look at malcom marshall he will be a dead meat in todays time bowling at batsmans pads all the time. holding looks medium fast. only andy roberts and joel garner look great. lillee looks ordinary-no doubt terrifying for his age- thompson is wayward -like hayw. tai

  • @murkygreen. yes sure and shoaib akhtar,brett lee ,allan donald waqar younis shaun tait hayward klusener bishop dillon ken benjamin all these were medium pace bowlers?get your facts straight. in any case the pitches in the 90's were fastest ever. you watch your youtube videos of matchs in australia-years 70 and 80's the pitches look subcontinental dusty. also the bowles of 80's are overrated lilee marshall and holding are medium fast compared to todays bowlers. their super speed is a myth.

  • Sachin did not play express pace at test level. Almost all these bowlers are medium fast. I think Gavaskar, Vishwanath and Amarnath were more skilled than sachin in playing the genuine fast men. And it is a shame that Amarnath is all but forgotten.

  • sachin,sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin sachin indiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaa

  • I NEVER SEEN LARA DOING THIS TO QUALITY FAST BOWLERS

  • i've been looking for this - i think it was the princess di charity match. de silva was batting at the other end and both he and tendulkar tore the bowling to shreds

  • sachin was better like that, now he is more of an accumulator

  • which match is this?

  • During this match, he scored a 1/3 of his runs in a couple of overs from Aamir Sohail. When you subtract those runs and deliveries from his total, it becomes clear that his scoring rate against the other bowlers was pretty mediocre. That's the real magic of Tendulkar. His statistics look great until you analyze them.

  • @ihamoitc2005

    Actually the real magic of Tendulkar is how he has conned practically every great bowler for the last 2 decades into picking him as the best batsman they have bowled to, or at most at No.2 behind the other legend of our times-Lara. But over 90% of bowlers would have Tendulkar as the best.

    Not to mention most of the elite batsmen - Steve, Ponting ,Lara etc.

    And most knowledgeable observers of the game.

    Man, what a magician- Conned 'em all.

  • @ihamoitc2005 Actually the real magic of Tendulkar is how he has conned practically every great bowler for the last 2 decades into picking him as the best batsman they have bowled to, or at most at No.2 behind the other legend of our times-Lara. But over 90% of bowlers would have Tendulkar as the best.

    Not to mention most of the elite batsmen - Steve, Ponting ,Lara etc.

    And most knowledgeable observers of the game.

    Man, what a magician- Conned 'em all.

  • Common guys, why do you have to defend Tendulkar against good-for-nothings like Irifalchen and robelinda2? The very fact that these guys are from Australia is a huge curse to them. Aussies are known all over the world as the worst losers, and now that they are losing like crazy, they just can't take it! In any case, SRT makes more money while drinking coffee that what these 'cricket lovers' make all year combined (one of them is a guitar teacher....yuk!), so do we need to bother about them?

  • @sareelover1 ,True that.

  • Comment removed

  • We just crapped all over Australia in the world cup quarters and threw them out by the scuff of their necks.Pakistan did the same and now Ponting is probably back home taking a dump reading a newspaper showering the Aussies with criticism.Oh the joy of it all.

  • @uthumb1 I dont think Ponting would be at home yet. India isnt exactly very close to Australia.

  • He is way past Bradman.Bradman was a great of his time.Today's cricket you'd see Bradman scoring a consistent 0 in all forms of the game against pace bowling.

  • @uthumb1 I doubt Bradman would even get selected these days, I think you'd have to be alive and breathing to get selected in a cricket team, but hey you never know with technology making more and more impact on today's matches, it could be done one day.

  • He hits 3 fours and its called an assault?? It was a charity match, who cares? I'm sure McGrath got his own back on Sachin in the 99 World Cup and 2003 World Cup, you know, matches that actually mean something.

  • @robelinda2 Yeah real matches like the one we just played at Ahmedabad? Where we thrashed the crap out of Aus and threw them out of the world cup?

  • @uthumb1 Congrats on a fine victory.

  • @uthumb1 wtf are you so cocky about, that match was a dismal performance. Winning was made remotely possible after yuvraj started getting into form. if those two overs had been played like the rest of the match you wouldn't be in over your head about how "india thrashed Austrlaia". You have players like stupid Gambhir who just don't know what to do in which situation. Australia kept India in their clutches extremely well except for two overs which would go on to spell victory.

  • @Irifalchen Whatever dude, Aus lost and thats what matters.Yeah India thrashed the shit out of Aus. Keep searching for more excuses to justify that monumental loss as it is the only thing that you can do :D

  • @uthumb1 keep feeding your ego by telling yourself that India thrashed Australia, but ultimately the truth stays, Australian innings were better to watch and better cricket too, be it batting or fielding.

  • @Irifalchen lol feeding my ego?You're the one who is trying to justify your crappy aussie team's loss to India!!hahaha never seen that one before.I thought only Pakistanis had a severe case of sour grapes but looks like you joined that bandwagon :)

  • @uthumb1 if you want to be nationalistic, go ahead and do so, pull yourself out of the support and then watch the match,

  • @uthumb1 uhh. . . i dnt think his teams aussie. seems to be closer home than tht. i think we beat them too.

  • @robelinda2 are you trying to suggest that mcgrath wouldnt want to be comtetive enough in a match that features the world's greatest batsmen and bowlers??? i mean i know it was a charity match. . . .but fast bowlers dnt know nothing about charity. unless its donating bouncers. if ur hit for runs ur try hard to get back. dsnt matter wht match it is. and back then players werent protected by their boards so thr was no 'meaningless' cricket as such.

  • grate batsman.... sachin every time he raped on pakistani bowlers

  • its mind blowing

  • wat a sight.....

    tendulkar and saeed anwar,....the 2 of the most prolific batsmen of thier time....playing 2gether.

  • lara is better

  • Oh PLZ.....................

  • @2SXC2H8 Yes Lara Dutta is definitely hotter than Sachin.

  • can any one upload full innings????

  • How easily he plays.........wen u look at his batting,u'll feel ohh...batting is this much a simpler job?elegant player.......the greatest batsman of all time......

  • lund hona chae da jawan

  • alllman2000 ...

    very rightly said bro.......have to agree with u totally....

  • alllman2000 ...

    yah very rightly said..tendulkar FACED DONALD at his PRIME in 92 SA TOUR & 96 SA TOUR--& scored 111 & 169 respectively....

    & also he scored 97 against DONALD in WANKHEDE's GREEN TOP wicket...

    DONALD admitted that TENDULKAR is the best batsman he ever bowled..

    btw who is the dumb questioned tendulkar against DONALD ?:D:d

  • i could do that..... but only on xbox. :-(

  • sachin and brian lara i can't decide which one is the G.O.A.T both were amazinglt talented and breathtaking.

  • the drive off donald's.... donald should be like "dang, how did he do that!!"

  • I rate this Rest of the World innings against MCC as right up there with Sachins best knocks in ODIs. All the shots he played on the day had elegance and grace written all over them. It was simply exquisite.The game is also one of the most shining examples of what ODI cricket was all about, at the time. This was before the popcorn version of Twenty20 was even a whimsical idea in some brit's head. It was ironic that on that day the only person who could and did end up getting him out was Kumble.

  • Comment removed

  • why dont u mofos check out how certain batsmen have done against the best team for the last 2 decades? i.e Aus.

    This is the problem...u asses have a predecided criteria...and then desperately search for some ,any data which will in your minds assist in reinforcing these conclusions in your sick brains.

    It is like looking at a gloriousl diamond and desperately searching for a scratch. and then when u apparently find something which deludes u enough u immediately start ejaculating on your comp

  • ANd "dude since u "searched for allan donald" read this and learn:

    'The best batsman I've bowled to' by allan donald- your hero himself.

    surely he knows more than u do about cricket

  • You know,i love freedom,democracy etc.

    BUT there is a dark side:

    i.e when pathetic, asses,with "bigbootys", putrefying over their computers take on the right to denigrate Masters...and in the process reveal nothing but their own utter ignorance....Guess there is always a dark side to even the best things.

  • Agreed.Donald had the wood over Sachin.

  • opinions of jackasses like u hardly matter , if Sachin wasnt really good u wudnt have had so many great cricketing legend themselves regarding him as the finest batsman of all time.

    so y dont u just fuck off and keep ur shit opinions with urself. bastard

  • @amazingIndians tht 'less known bowler' was in fact a 'well known all rounder' asshole. his name is abdul razzak. ummm. . . last i checked he was dropped for the umpteenth time. and mcgrath only got him out in 2 WCs. '99 and 2003. both times ind was facing big totals and pressure was on sachin. come to think of it even mark waugh got out for a duck in '99 finals.

  • @amazingIndians he was the best,is and wud be the best..no doubt which country u r from..i wudnt even waste my time asking

  • @amazingIndians he wasnt even 24 wen he was 'murdered' (really??? ) by those bowlers. now many 24 yr olds do you know who were even good enuf to take stance against them. ponting? ohh please. . . he was split open by srinath (playing his last series in aus) harmison (who has a bowling avg of more than 31 kemar roach, fidel edwards and many more. yes wasim and donal got him out a lot. . . .but the relevent point is how many runs did he score against them?

  • @BigYBootyDaddy0 you seem to have the icc rankings playing in your head on loop. yo udo realise that the more matches you play in a year, the more points you get. and the number of matches any team plays in a year has gone up big time. besides, unlike kallis and ponting, sachin doesn;t have anything to prove anymore, and so doesn;t have to play every single match.

    now come up with something better than an ICC ranking which the whole cricketing world is reserved about anyway.

  • Firstly Donald:

    1)Donald has categorically stated that Tendulkar is the best batsman he has ever bowled to.

    2)You are completely ignorant about the use of statsbases. For eg.if Tendulkar scores a hundred against Donald but gets dismissed by another bowler then the hundred is not counted. The 12 avg you get is only for those matches which Donald got Tendulkar out in.

  • 3)Tendulkar played Donald and co. at their primes in the 91 and 96 tours. Donald faded thereafter and others filled their boots

  • 4)Lara was infact much more pathetic against Donald at his peak. He filled his boots in the 2000s and so "righted" his record.

    5)Check the records till Tendulkar was relatively fit till 01/01/03- and you will realise that as long as Tendulkar was fit he was way ahead of the rest.

  • You know..i know ur type. uve got some kinky bias which will not permit u to recognise even if it hits u in the face.

    but surely if someone is ignorant of a subject then the view of others knowledgeable of the same must be considered? so when practically every expert in the game from bradman,benaud,woodcock down to lara,ponting etc consider Tendulkar as the best modern day batsman...then perhaps it is time for u to switch over to another sport?

  • But no u wont- u will ACTUALLY WATCH tendulkar videos!!! subconsciously marvelling at his unparalled genius...and then due to your inbuilt bias pass some comment....get a life...go watch some other player, or some other sport of which u have some understanding.

    cheeeers!

  • Dude, youre pathetic and so is the moderator for removing my last comment. All those lines you wrote to say so little. The stats speak for themselves; 35.35 average against South Africa. The title of the vid states that Tendulkar "launches an assault"... is that accurate? He hits Donald for 4! Ponting and Kallis recently beat Tendulkar out for Player of the Decade, similarly look at the ICC ratings and take note of career high... Ponting942, Kallis 935 , S.R. Tendulkar898. Bias???

  • Oh,i would say u are pathetic.

    u havent even read my comments and checked stats till tendulkar was injury free till say 01/01/03.

    what ,of course, is most pathetic is that u can actually sit here and ogle at the magnificence of tendulkar...and still with your inbuilt bias pass stupid comments on the greatest batsman of the modern generation.

  • i would say that any top 100 player would take out federer if federer had say a severe case of tennis elbow.

    but only an absolute buffoon and one who has ZERO knowledge about cricket or sport in general would offer up those head to heads as some sort of proof of the top 100 players prowess.

    u dont like tendulkar for some deep rooted psychological reasons is understandable. out of millions of ppl u cant make everyone happy.

  • So,instead of revealing your utter ignorance about cricket at any level whatsoever(never mind the highest level)...by using selective stats as and when it supports your preconceived conclusions...it would be beneficial to you and all fans if you could learn something about cricket b4 first making pompous , high sounding comments...with practically zero knowledge.

    cheers.

  • And FINALLY ,like I said if you dont like Tendulkar (for whatever personal reasons)...WHAT ARE YOU DOING OGLING AT HIS VIDEOS?!!!

    GET the f... out of here! Simple.

  • OOh ,could resist -specifically for u assholes.

    1)Born to bat- Peter Roebuck

    2) Once in a century star- Steve Waugh

    3) Sachins top of my batpack- Nasser Hussain

    4)The end is nigh but Tendulkar is not yet finished- Paul Moon

    5) Only Sachin Tendulkar can equal Don Bradman- John Woodcock

    6)Tendulkars final onslaught =cricinfo

    Please read and learn.

  • Oh oh and also:

    There is a vid right here on youtube: Tendulkar is the best batsman after Bradman.

    THis is by a man who knows more about cricket than you, your father, your grandfather...and your entire extended family COMBINED.

    Now as i mentioned initially , pls get the F...out of the Tendulkar channels...and go watch ponting,kallis whoever...ADIOS.

  • WHatt!!! STILL here?! dumb ass...do u even know the difference between decade and career.

    have u (can u?) read the other stuff i put up.

    u know ,like i said, i know your sick type...uve got some internal psychotic disturbance...so for ppl like muhammad ali,federer,maradona,tendulkar­...i.e all the greatest u sickos will attempt your heart out to show them somehow in as poor a light as u possibly can." ali got his jaw broken by ken norton! ..how can he be fast or the greatest?

  • "And u know, when ali was in the 2nd decade of his career, XYZ were actually voted as boxers of the decade ,my my...tut tut"

    librarians like u shud be stuffed in a book and then flushed

  • i dont go to their channels and churlishly attempt to put them down....BUT u sick ppl will incessantly OGLE at tendulkar...

    SO,now get the fuck outta here and go watch ponting,kallis,dravid...whoeve­r..

  • And if u want to start off with absolute "contextless" stats...i could start off with zillions. such as checking out laras, and pontings avg. in india.

    actually adinfinitum.

    but it would be degrading to stoop to your "libararian" mentality and have a "statistical battle"-so to speak.

    Only librarians ,utter dolts,couch potatoes,and other such psychological miserables resort to stunts such as selective stats to "prove" a preconceived notion.

  • Sachin can do anything and I mean anything

  • @boxedin chokeduIkar is a musIim name and sachin is not a musIim

  • Simply Sachin

  • simply sachin.

  • this the diana memorial match i think .

  • total demolition

  • I think Tendulkar-Walsh was another fantastic battle to witness. Two great thinkers of the game launching an assault on each other!

  • best batsman ever after don!!

    viv, sobers, lara, ponting..

    none hold a candle to this bloody champion right there

  • @stardevilish just a correction best batsman ever!!

  • @stardevilish: You mean the Don is the best batsman after Tendulkar.

  • @stardevilish tendulkar also !!!

  • he at his best was much better than any other batsman at his best..

    lara, viv, ponting.. they all dont hold a candle to this bloody champion right there

  • wow !!!

  • Thats awsome batting!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more