Bible explains ape-men clearly. The book of Yasher [chapter 9,sentence 35] says that one third of those who built the tower of Babel was killed, one third was scattered throughout the earth, and one third was cursed and "became like apes and elephants". This shows that evolution and hinduism are not based on truth.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE ( In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil) ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their vital structures, organs, and reproductive system hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works doesn't mean there's no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the apparatus exists to direct the formation of more cells, but how did that first cell originate? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not arrange or produce. If a variation survives then that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
I think it may also prove helpful to some of the viewers here to try to evaluate many of the more strident claims of the anti-theist critique ("brights") from a ideological/ metaphysics perspective. Check out the recent article by Jackson Lears in the May 16, 2011 issue of the The Nation entitled "Same Old New Atheism" .The article offers a compelling analysis of Sam Harris' works. Consideration is given to general secular social perspectives
banana man? he is still promoting that nonsense? he came up with it over 20 years ago in the town square of his and my home town where he started as a street preacher.
someone quipped that there is something else, similarly sized and shaped that fits the hand perfectly also. you can surely guess what
you can lead an atheist to evidence but you cant make him think lol so he basically say we are horses, well i can attest to that i do have a very large ... lol
There are two sure fire ways to convert any christian to atheism. 1) tell them to actually read the bible. 2) tell them to listen to a few videos of Ray Comfort lol
The only people dumber then ray most be the people who believe him. I can still remember when i first saw the bannana video. I laughed until i cried. I watched it several times and had a hard timre breathing. It was hillarious. Thank you ray. Thank you christians. You have given me so many laughs throughout the years . Thank you
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I guess the computerized voice somehow gives credibility? Trying to mimic Stephen Hawking is how a person with no credibility attempts to gain credibility!
@WSGAC The medium is use is not what gives me credibility, but the message and the data that I relay. Besides, who are you to judge since you have no videos of your own?
I guess a simple artificial voice must really intimidate you. LOL
I think I nailed it! You have a Hawking fetish. Or you use a Hawking-like medium to compensate for something lacking! I think it's the latter, and your reply confirms it!
i like richard dawkins' response to the "banana fits hand" idea. The pineapple certainly doesn't; yet, it is equally delicious and healthy. The Cucumber and the rectum is a different story ..
Geez is this the 21st century or the 11th? This is just like saying santa claus exists because he fits perfectly through the chimney to put your presents under the tree. I really hope that people will start thinking for themselves instead of blindly swallowing everything their parents tell them.
The BANANA, and obvious creation, by GOD, to fit in the hands of all great apes, as seen in zoo's around the World,...GOD also intelligently designed the banana so that his favorite ape,... RAY COMFORT (created in his own Image) would make a complete ASS out of himself ..... Ray, as a flunky, your god still loves you, and ..We all are enjoying his sense of humer...as well as many more of your fruit basket insights....GO ..Ray go...., how much longer are you going to pettle your shit?
As ray Comfort illustrates, the people who attack evolution have not actually studied it. If they did, they would see that there's nothing TO attack. It isn't a Satanic Conspiracy, it's simply the description of a process, providing a very useful taxonomy and a way to understand relationships. I see no way around this problem of ignorance. And it will become far worse if we allow these untutored people to drag our science education back into the bronze age. That is what caused the Dark Ages!
@Imaginefree69 just wondering, when you said 'you can lead an atheist to evidence, but you can't make him think' were you making fun of atheists? because you obviously promote evolution *waves flag* but i'm not sure if you hate atheists XP
You know, the first time I heard about the "banana argument", it was from a Christian nutter that was seriously presenting it to me as proof of his god. I didn't know he was a Christian at the time, and I thought he was joking. I laughed and said, "Yeah, I guess you're right. There is a god." He then smiled in satisfaction. I then realized my mistake and said... "Oh, you were serious?" :)
The basic problem is that the people who attack evolution have not actually studied it. If they did, they would see that there's nothing TO attack. It isn't a Satanic Conspiracy, it's simply the description of a process, providing a very useful taxonomy and a way to understand relationships. I see no way around this problem of ignorance. And it will become far worse if we allow these untutored people to drag our science education back into the bronze age. That is what caused the Dark Ages!
By sounding like a complete idiot and embarrassing himself whenever he challenges atheism and science, Ray Comfort unwittingly advances the case for atheism without having to respond to him.
Honestly, I`ma Christian, but watching this, I want to bang my head on the wall or scream, "You`re not helping our case!"
I have plenty of atheist (and homosexual) friends. Everyone is entittled to their opinion, but trying to sell your're religion with a banana as proof of God is... BANANAS! Haha, bad joke.
In the way that astronomers are afraid to debate astrologers and chemists afraid to debate alchemists and geologists afraid to debate flat-earthers...
...and historians are afraid to debate Holocaust deniers, and climate scientists are afraid to debate climate change deniers, and mathematicians are afraid to debate numerologists, and physicians are afraid to debate homeopaths and anthropologists are afraid to debate academic racists...
Both sides? How arrogant do you have to be to think there is only evolution and your story of creation? Maybe the oceans were filled by a god's tears, maybe there is an elephant holding up the earth. TEACH THEM ALL, but not in science class.
@hyperseauton Dawkins doesn't waste his time by debating a wilfully ignorant creationist like Comfort and his pet buddy Kirk.
Is there much use in a debate between Stephen Hawkings and Miss Universe 2009 about the origin of the cosmos? No. Likewise Dawkins doesn't debate Comfort.
Debating the creatures like Cameron or Comfort is a kind of humiliation.
If you represent certain level of honesty and knowledge and education - you'll rather try to avoid any sort of the confrontation with these incredible delusional idiots.
In other words - the is no glory in debating them whatsoever.
It is a total joke people, Ray Comfort was not being serious. Get over yourselves seriously your Evolution takes as much faith as Creation if you deny that you are ignorant.
Nice try. Straight from "Way of the bastard's" playbook. I am sorry, but you won't be able to cause misinformation on here. Banana man, has been debunked. Alot.
Now, how exactly does evolution "require faith"? Recognizing evolution does not require me to swear allegiance to anyone or anything, nor does it demand that I conform to a set of living standards that have been obsolete for centuries.
Your argument is not only ignorant, it is flat out stupid.
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? evolution is a fact, the way it works is a theory, it takes no faith to confirm that a fact is in front of you, WOW you're an idiot man, I can't believe you just said that, and yes that stupid fuck is being serious (I hope your joking) and if you are don't take what I said personally. God makes as much sense as the tooth fairy, and has an equal amount of proof, which is NONE.
It isn't a joke actually. Well, it IS a joke, but it isn't meant to be one.
As for evolution requiring faith... well, that would be far more convincing if you weren't just regurgitating what you've obviously heard from other christians. I'm willing to bet you haven't even bothered studying evolution at all, so your opinion is pretty much worthless.
first you yell, no... than you make a funny FSM remark wich i praise you for and then you say its just a theory, i kinda miss what you are trying to say here
Gravity isn't what physicists say it is. It's the work of the FSM. He holds us down with his noodly appendages. The theory of gravity is just a theory, with no evidence. I hate all of the lies that "scientists" come up with to explain the world when it is clearly Him pulling the strings(no pun intended). They just hate the FSM.
2. Evolution does not take faith since we have evidence for it. Creation takes faith since there is no evidence for it and it goes against the evidence we have.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
And I want to thank you. Because of this video and others like it I will be teaming up with 20 street preachers and handing out 1000 copys of our version of the Origin of Species come nov 21
thanks for lighting this fire come to my channel nov 22 to see what you did
You're acting as if I should be impressed that you wasted your money on the creationist propaganda. Most people will take this corrupt version, but do you have any idea where the first 50 pages will land? More than likely, the waste bins all across Canada and the US.
And do you have any idea how much money that was wasted there? We are all laughing at you for wasting money like that. Say, since you like wasting money, I have some real estate in Florida you might like...
Apparently he came out apologizing that he didn't know how much the banana was altered by modern man. He didn't mention that it was with knowledge of genetic evolution, but w/e at least he made a fool of himself again.
I know man, he shouldn't apologize if you ask me.he should point out his stupid mistake and accept the fact that his ignorance in the subject was the cause for his ridicule by everyone not just atheist dam it, also theistical scientist and people who know about evolution. the video makes appeare as if we were being dicks who didn-t know what he meant to say. dishonesty as always.
I Love this Video and also I checked out your Channel. Very interesting! If you need any help getting this Video and your Channel exposed to where it is on top in all the searches. I found this site called tubeviews.(net) that has took my breath away. I'm working on my 4th Channel now, this one I just made. My Videos are getting so many hits now. Check it out and keep in touch.
Doesn't Ray Comfort make the argument that the banana is proof there is a god because 'it was shaped to fit in your hand and the peel is like a wrapper for it'?
When did he offer Dawkins money? I haven't heard about that. <-- he offered money to dawkins, 10 thousand dollars to debate him,he needs to debate dawkins and chritopher hitchens,ray and kirck would get there asses kicked,whats funny is i posted a comment on one of the way of the masters videos on you tube saying ray doesn't have the guts to debate christopher hitchens or dawkins then like a few days later i ehard about this money ray offered dawkins for a debate,lol,
How long ago was this? <-- how long ago was what? when i posted that comment on way of the master youtube vidoe? well they got rid of the comment,i made the post in febuary
This has been flagged as spam show
Bible explains ape-men clearly. The book of Yasher [chapter 9,sentence 35] says that one third of those who built the tower of Babel was killed, one third was scattered throughout the earth, and one third was cursed and "became like apes and elephants". This shows that evolution and hinduism are not based on truth.
goodinfotoknow 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy totally wishes that banana was a penis.
robotzorro 3 months ago
lol
GeniusAtheist 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE ( In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil) ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their vital structures, organs, and reproductive system hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works doesn't mean there's no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the apparatus exists to direct the formation of more cells, but how did that first cell originate? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not arrange or produce. If a variation survives then that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Mogley52 4 months ago
christians ur watching this retard and relise how stupid he makes u look
stevenut88 4 months ago
Clevernessinadvocatingbadcausesoftenliestauntinglyjustbeyond
thebelieverscapacityforrefutationthedialecticofthedisbelieverseldomlendsitself
tospiritualthingsItisnotsimplythatbelieversshouldshrink
automaticallyfromencountersbutthatthenonbelieveroftendoesnot
reallycaretoknowHeseekstohavehissporttoworkupasemanticalsweat
graspingwhtatpleasureshecanfromalifefilledwithforlornnessOtherswhoare
havingtheirfirstwilddoubtsofdoubtsareanxioustoputdownanychallengetotheirdisbelief.
mollymu1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think it may also prove helpful to some of the viewers here to try to evaluate many of the more strident claims of the anti-theist critique ("brights") from a ideological/ metaphysics perspective. Check out the recent article by Jackson Lears in the May 16, 2011 issue of the The Nation entitled "Same Old New Atheism" .The article offers a compelling analysis of Sam Harris' works. Consideration is given to general secular social perspectives
shieldsff 8 months ago
I agree with the content of this video, but this computer voice is f****** up
atheist1904 8 months ago
i loved your work with the f@g if you dont know who they are then look them up on youtube
frootofaloom 10 months ago
banana man? he is still promoting that nonsense? he came up with it over 20 years ago in the town square of his and my home town where he started as a street preacher.
someone quipped that there is something else, similarly sized and shaped that fits the hand perfectly also. you can surely guess what
Strefanasha 10 months ago
indeed. he has promoted atheism with his arropgant stupidity. as a convinced christian I am OUTRAGED that this had happened.
he is far too stupid and arrogant to defend anything properly
Strefanasha 10 months ago
you can lead an atheist to evidence but you cant make him think lol so he basically say we are horses, well i can attest to that i do have a very large ... lol
cjhmmp 10 months ago
@cjhmmp As a deist I can say at least horses have a quiet dignity and serve a purpose. Can't say the same about creationiss.
NUTCASE71733 4 months ago
He's correct in the sense that what is created, has a "creator". What he fails on though, is that not every creator is a 'who'.
berner 10 months ago
There are two sure fire ways to convert any christian to atheism. 1) tell them to actually read the bible. 2) tell them to listen to a few videos of Ray Comfort lol
allanhill1 11 months ago 2
Of course the truth is pretty, what are you on about? In fact it's beautiful.
Gonnakillyou 11 months ago
Hey guys, guess what? It also...fits....in my ass!
unlimitedchikara 1 year ago
@unlimitedchikara This can't be a coincidence. My friend, you have irrefutable proof to creationists that God is gay.
sonicwingnut 10 months ago
The only people dumber then ray most be the people who believe him. I can still remember when i first saw the bannana video. I laughed until i cried. I watched it several times and had a hard timre breathing. It was hillarious. Thank you ray. Thank you christians. You have given me so many laughs throughout the years . Thank you
surlagachette2 1 year ago
Lol. Wow. This is one funny fool. Anyone remember the days when evidence was required for a statement to have value? This is pure opinion.
burntbit 1 year ago
Where does the money come from?
I wanna make some money!
uriituw 1 year ago
In my opinion this kind of personal attack does nothing to promote atheism.
Treefrogs2 1 year ago
Damn this voice was annoying.
bary1234 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I guess the computerized voice somehow gives credibility? Trying to mimic Stephen Hawking is how a person with no credibility attempts to gain credibility!
Nice try though!
WSGAC 1 year ago
@WSGAC The medium is use is not what gives me credibility, but the message and the data that I relay. Besides, who are you to judge since you have no videos of your own?
I guess a simple artificial voice must really intimidate you. LOL
th3w01fv2 1 year ago 24
@th3w01fv2, I
If the "medium" didn't matter, then why use it?
I think I nailed it! You have a Hawking fetish. Or you use a Hawking-like medium to compensate for something lacking! I think it's the latter, and your reply confirms it!
Have a nice day poser!
WSGAC 1 year ago
@WSGAC
I want to see you posting the same complains on the videos posted by creationists that use digitalized voices. Until you do that, you're a hypocrite.
BohemianBlasphemy 1 year ago
@th3w01fv2 I liked it. I think it gave the vid a humouristic approach fitting the context. :D
Stinukli 9 months ago
@WSGAC That's not quite the same computer voice as Stephen Hawking. I would do the same considering the not so pretty voice and accent I have.
anarkoFred 1 year ago
... A round of applause for Banana Man!!!!
Unicron4ever 1 year ago
comfort is one of the dumbest humans
HarshJourney 1 year ago
i like richard dawkins' response to the "banana fits hand" idea. The pineapple certainly doesn't; yet, it is equally delicious and healthy. The Cucumber and the rectum is a different story ..
corsair831 1 year ago
Geez is this the 21st century or the 11th? This is just like saying santa claus exists because he fits perfectly through the chimney to put your presents under the tree. I really hope that people will start thinking for themselves instead of blindly swallowing everything their parents tell them.
nightlydruid 1 year ago 4
LOL!!
Allanfries 1 year ago
religion is a hallucinogen that causes brain damage.
disteremsh 1 year ago 3
The BANANA, and obvious creation, by GOD, to fit in the hands of all great apes, as seen in zoo's around the World,...GOD also intelligently designed the banana so that his favorite ape,... RAY COMFORT (created in his own Image) would make a complete ASS out of himself ..... Ray, as a flunky, your god still loves you, and ..We all are enjoying his sense of humer...as well as many more of your fruit basket insights....GO ..Ray go...., how much longer are you going to pettle your shit?
joewittstock 1 year ago
Thanks You Ray Comfort for SHOWING that creationists are complete IDIOTs and retarded, as we ALWAYS knew they were !!
Andrewlohbihler 1 year ago 2
Imaginefree69 1 year ago 2
@Imaginefree69 I just read the Amazon previews of Ray Comfort's new book
You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, But You Can't Make Him Think.
Have a look; you won't believe your eyes!
Comfort thinks that according to evolution,
man and woman evolved separately but simultaneously,
water evolved just in time for them to drink it,
and that gravity evolved just in time to hold them to the earth!
It's really the most astounding drivel I've ever seen.
Have a look!
Better yet, write a review!
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 just wondering, when you said 'you can lead an atheist to evidence, but you can't make him think' were you making fun of atheists? because you obviously promote evolution *waves flag* but i'm not sure if you hate atheists XP
unless you're agnostic which is fine really
crazyedd123 1 year ago
@crazyedd123
*sigh*
Read carefully before replying, Ed.
Note the use of capital letters.
That is the name of Ray Comfort's book.
I don't hate anyone,
and I am an atheist.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
You know, the first time I heard about the "banana argument", it was from a Christian nutter that was seriously presenting it to me as proof of his god. I didn't know he was a Christian at the time, and I thought he was joking. I laughed and said, "Yeah, I guess you're right. There is a god." He then smiled in satisfaction. I then realized my mistake and said... "Oh, you were serious?" :)
fearguis 1 year ago 2
So true. :)
websnarf 1 year ago
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
They are not real Atheists, they are Satanists (Rev 2:9)
They want to create Atheists, and erase religion so they
can own your ass and mind!
ChristianMuslum 1 year ago
i love the robot voice, so funny.
aARIESsSs 1 year ago
Banana man is quite stupid :/
He has all these questions but if he read a Richard Dawkins book he'd be like "oh shit"
DagonMetalMusic 1 year ago 2
lol good video and i would like to throw something at this idiot all he talks about is god hell all hes doing is making money off of god
Ryanb1105 1 year ago
I really want to throw a pineapple at Ray Comfort's head.
That is assuming he actually believes what he says.
PeachyPeachPie 2 years ago 3
HAHA!
thanks ray ray! fucking idiot...
Zentz29 2 years ago
By sounding like a complete idiot and embarrassing himself whenever he challenges atheism and science, Ray Comfort unwittingly advances the case for atheism without having to respond to him.
socksumi 2 years ago 6
Honestly, I`ma Christian, but watching this, I want to bang my head on the wall or scream, "You`re not helping our case!"
I have plenty of atheist (and homosexual) friends. Everyone is entittled to their opinion, but trying to sell your're religion with a banana as proof of God is... BANANAS! Haha, bad joke.
Misheru100 2 years ago 15
This comment has received too many negative votes show
speak with your real voice,
shit.
odacir64 2 years ago
What are you talking about? THIS IS MY REAL VOICE!
th3w01fv2 2 years ago 32
@th3w01fv2
hey you sound like Stephen Hawkings...
Stephen, is that you? =)
kryptondude1 2 years ago
lol, a computer has come to life and is posting youtube videos.
sjh7132 2 years ago 2
@sjh7132 Skynet has become self-aware...
infectingthecrypts 2 years ago
@th3w01fv2 its a trap!
renano95 1 year ago
@th3w01fv2 i would only say not to use the computer voice cause it just kinda sounds annoying
abarbar06 1 year ago
@odacir64 - I like that voice. It makes the clip artsy. :-)
Zeeboe 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Comfort is better than Dawkins:
Proof: Dawkins is afraid to debate Comfort.
hyperseauton 2 years ago
In the way that astronomers are afraid to debate astrologers and chemists afraid to debate alchemists and geologists afraid to debate flat-earthers...
ChaseKittens 2 years ago 4
...and historians are afraid to debate Holocaust deniers, and climate scientists are afraid to debate climate change deniers, and mathematicians are afraid to debate numerologists, and physicians are afraid to debate homeopaths and anthropologists are afraid to debate academic racists...
Teach BOTH sides! Let US decide.
hyperseauton 2 years ago
Both sides? How arrogant do you have to be to think there is only evolution and your story of creation? Maybe the oceans were filled by a god's tears, maybe there is an elephant holding up the earth. TEACH THEM ALL, but not in science class.
sjh7132 2 years ago 6
Both sides...?
What both sides' ?
Are you trying to teach our children the astrology, the palm reading, the numerology, the religion, the alchemy, the creationism ?
You can go around and learn these things from the books scribed by these fuckups.
Do not even try to put these things into the children heads...!!!
Polonaise2008 2 years ago 7
@hyperseauton Dawkins doesn't waste his time by debating a wilfully ignorant creationist like Comfort and his pet buddy Kirk.
Is there much use in a debate between Stephen Hawkings and Miss Universe 2009 about the origin of the cosmos? No. Likewise Dawkins doesn't debate Comfort.
Gigano1986 2 years ago 14
@Gigano1986 Pet? I thought Kirk was his sex slave.
SuperBspb 1 month ago
Debating the creatures like Cameron or Comfort is a kind of humiliation.
If you represent certain level of honesty and knowledge and education - you'll rather try to avoid any sort of the confrontation with these incredible delusional idiots.
In other words - the is no glory in debating them whatsoever.
Polonaise2008 2 years ago 6
Yeah, Satanists love to use deception as a tool, False Flag ops like 911, etc..
They pose as Creationist, and then act like fools to deceive same.
and air it on the Media they own, purchased with your laundered tax dollars.
Mr. Gives, do we need faith to know gerbils suffocate in 123's assets?
TheTruthPusher 2 years ago
reminds me of the old anonymous vids against scientology lol. haven't seen any of those for awhile
isaachaze1 2 years ago
Is a pomegranate proof that God doesn't exist?
Man, those things are messy : )
roback85 2 years ago 5
@roback85
Pineapples
;)
mfunke 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ooh boy how incredibily childish this is, shows again that atheist are never serious.
I bet you just voted thumb down.
See! theists can be right too!
NOnehtaehgnik 2 years ago
Ah generalizations, what wit.
Vire70 2 years ago
When the cameras and not running Ray uses the "atheist nightmare" on Kirks anus.....
mynameisbobtoo 2 years ago 9
ray comfort is a banana!
neoarcadezr 2 years ago 2
Total TRASH !!!!!!!
Andrewlohbihler 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is a total joke people, Ray Comfort was not being serious. Get over yourselves seriously your Evolution takes as much faith as Creation if you deny that you are ignorant.
Reapster04 2 years ago
Nice try. Straight from "Way of the bastard's" playbook. I am sorry, but you won't be able to cause misinformation on here. Banana man, has been debunked. Alot.
th3w01fv2 2 years ago 7
Now, how exactly does evolution "require faith"? Recognizing evolution does not require me to swear allegiance to anyone or anything, nor does it demand that I conform to a set of living standards that have been obsolete for centuries.
Your argument is not only ignorant, it is flat out stupid.
WhosTheWretched 2 years ago
Acutally he was being serious.
Have you notice that all his video are pro- christain. Also notices that he has never made another parody video
Ray Comfort isn't know for doing paradoy videos.
badpanda84 2 years ago
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? evolution is a fact, the way it works is a theory, it takes no faith to confirm that a fact is in front of you, WOW you're an idiot man, I can't believe you just said that, and yes that stupid fuck is being serious (I hope your joking) and if you are don't take what I said personally. God makes as much sense as the tooth fairy, and has an equal amount of proof, which is NONE.
robbaress 2 years ago 3
No he was... Ray Comfort just doesnt understand evolution at all, and realised that the banana was domesticated by humans (evolution)
markgg1 2 years ago 5
It isn't a joke actually. Well, it IS a joke, but it isn't meant to be one.
As for evolution requiring faith... well, that would be far more convincing if you weren't just regurgitating what you've obviously heard from other christians. I'm willing to bet you haven't even bothered studying evolution at all, so your opinion is pretty much worthless.
Vire70 2 years ago
evolution requires just about as much faith as gravity
Zuurkool1 2 years ago 64
NO! It's all the work of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Gravity is just a theory(Theory of General Relativity).
123Atheist 2 years ago 3
first you yell, no... than you make a funny FSM remark wich i praise you for and then you say its just a theory, i kinda miss what you are trying to say here
Zuurkool1 2 years ago
@Zuurkool1
Gravity isn't what physicists say it is. It's the work of the FSM. He holds us down with his noodly appendages. The theory of gravity is just a theory, with no evidence. I hate all of the lies that "scientists" come up with to explain the world when it is clearly Him pulling the strings(no pun intended). They just hate the FSM.
123Atheist 2 years ago 3
yeahyeah very funny... you made your point. not really atheistic of you though isnt it?
Zuurkool1 2 years ago
"faith is believing in something you know ain't true."
-Mark Twain
whothecaresagives 2 years ago 9
@Zuurkool1
... clever! XD
Unicron4ever 1 year ago
@Zuurkool1 Um...no...it would need a focial for that...
Domodeath 1 year ago
@Domodeath
1... i don't know what your responding to
2... what the hell is a focial
Zuurkool1 1 year ago
@Reapster04
1. He was dead serious.
2. Evolution does not take faith since we have evidence for it. Creation takes faith since there is no evidence for it and it goes against the evidence we have.
TheRealQawser 1 year ago
what a fool
mike28 2 years ago
jesus mowes my lawn.
the end.
cali420king 2 years ago 2
He sells me oranges.
foshizol 2 years ago
yeah but at least he is funny even though that wasnt his intention
badpanda84 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And I want to thank you. Because of this video and others like it I will be teaming up with 20 street preachers and handing out 1000 copys of our version of the Origin of Species come nov 21
thanks for lighting this fire come to my channel nov 22 to see what you did
gypsydisciple 2 years ago
You're acting as if I should be impressed that you wasted your money on the creationist propaganda. Most people will take this corrupt version, but do you have any idea where the first 50 pages will land? More than likely, the waste bins all across Canada and the US.
And do you have any idea how much money that was wasted there? We are all laughing at you for wasting money like that. Say, since you like wasting money, I have some real estate in Florida you might like...
th3w01fv2 2 years ago 19
gypsy disciple?, don't you follow the hawk? and not jesus H. walker Christ?
BumLegionair 2 years ago
Good. If people read your version, and then read the real version they will understand that evolution is the real deal.
And sense you are on the street already, go a head and bite the curb. Save other people from your ignorance.
zamgwtfbq 2 years ago 2
Thank you bananaman
blauwen 2 years ago
Also this is sexual innuendo
EnthalpyH 2 years ago
THANK YOU BANANA MAN :D!!!!
blazingwarrior0 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Actually, a banana held sideways is much like an atheist. It smiles at the world and frowns at the heavens. And it's insides are mushy.
tracker1800 2 years ago
Comment removed
navimud 2 years ago
And delicious.
thesunmilitary 2 years ago
"And it's insides are mushy. "
Wait, so are you made out of some non-mushy organic material?
or METAL?
O.O
TheReasonWhyGuy 2 years ago
I bet Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron share a banana behind closed doors. Its a synthetic banana, made from silicone. And its 20" long.
harpo10 2 years ago 44
llllllllllllllmmmmmmmffffffffooooooolllllll.
funny shit bro.
a banana proves intelligent design as much a pineapple disproves it.
jrev37 2 years ago
Apparently he came out apologizing that he didn't know how much the banana was altered by modern man. He didn't mention that it was with knowledge of genetic evolution, but w/e at least he made a fool of himself again.
Proletariat12 2 years ago
I know man, he shouldn't apologize if you ask me.he should point out his stupid mistake and accept the fact that his ignorance in the subject was the cause for his ridicule by everyone not just atheist dam it, also theistical scientist and people who know about evolution. the video makes appeare as if we were being dicks who didn-t know what he meant to say. dishonesty as always.
jrev37 2 years ago
@harpo10 And it's shaped like it belongs to a horse.
berner 10 months ago
It's peanutbutter jelly time, peanutbutter jelly time!
Justinfh2point0 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
I Love this Video and also I checked out your Channel. Very interesting! If you need any help getting this Video and your Channel exposed to where it is on top in all the searches. I found this site called tubeviews.(net) that has took my breath away. I'm working on my 4th Channel now, this one I just made. My Videos are getting so many hits now. Check it out and keep in touch.
Very Lovely!
Adithidghf 2 years ago
I really think that Comfort is sincere, and he's a very engaging speaker. I wish he'd stay away from scientific topics.
jamesjeffreypaul 2 years ago
Sincere? HIM? Yeah right. He's a con artist pure and simple!!
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
Doesn't Ray Comfort make the argument that the banana is proof there is a god because 'it was shaped to fit in your hand and the peel is like a wrapper for it'?
Xipholaris 2 years ago
He did. That latest video of his, is a poor attempt at saving face and an attempt at taunting Dawkins into a debate. He's pathetic.
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
Awesome. "When you embrace the demeanor of Ray Comfort or WOTM, you are only a danger to yourself." Good video.
Chuloloc 2 years ago
This is why christianity gets a bad name...
muddmonkeys777 2 years ago
Yep! Because of clowns like that beating their chests like gorillas, and "Going bananas" ^_^
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
Haaaa! thats a good one...
muddmonkeys777 2 years ago
I got my moments where I got some good bad jokes.
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
It's kinda of hard having bad jokes when you rip on these clowns. They are just to E.Z.
muddmonkeys777 2 years ago
Ka-zing! Speaking of that weasel, you think he plans to make a quick buck off of Dawkins?
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
Of course, they have been doing it for years. We have seen this for a long time just wish that he would change...
muddmonkeys777 2 years ago
Money is a strong addiction...
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
I think Ray is a pretty cool guy. eh lies Christian and doesn't afraid of anything.
Zekkron 2 years ago
I know what frightens him. A Godless world. That he fears...
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
That and pineapples.
Zekkron 2 years ago
nice voice on this wolf :)
nibargerswife51482 2 years ago
It's nice for presentations and all, but it's not a voice I'd use for the mark IV
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
Ray Comfort offered a money to debate him? I belive that Richard Dawkins would make good old Ray an embarassment by destroying him.
redquas6920 2 years ago
If you buy their DVDs and books like gullible Christians do then the money comes from the people they exploit.
I'm assuming that Richard Dawkins turned him down because he doesn't want to be associated with a charlatan and a fraud.
Zed1967 2 years ago
damn. the way ray looks at that banana... so hot.
crumbinator 2 years ago 2
A peel he's going to slip on, or did he slip already ;D
mindwis3 2 years ago 2
Great vid... I don't know how I feel about the new voice, though. Sounds a bit weak.
Morpheus3x 2 years ago
It's not a replacement. I am only experimenting. My Avatar will still have that voice you know and love hehe
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
When did he offer Dawkins money? I haven't heard about that.
utukkuxul 2 years ago
Google for it. It's even in Ray Comfort's Wikipedia entry.
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
When did he offer Dawkins money? I haven't heard about that. <-- he offered money to dawkins, 10 thousand dollars to debate him,he needs to debate dawkins and chritopher hitchens,ray and kirck would get there asses kicked,whats funny is i posted a comment on one of the way of the masters videos on you tube saying ray doesn't have the guts to debate christopher hitchens or dawkins then like a few days later i ehard about this money ray offered dawkins for a debate,lol,
1metallica1 2 years ago 2
How long ago was this? Ray wouldn't stance a snowball's chance in Hell.
utukkuxul 2 years ago 4
The "Challenge" was issued around February. Dawkins should just let the bastard make an ass of himself.
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
How long ago was this? <-- how long ago was what? when i posted that comment on way of the master youtube vidoe? well they got rid of the comment,i made the post in febuary
1metallica1 2 years ago
Doesn't that remind you how a sub pays a Dominatrix to kick their ass? I am starting to think Ray Comfort is into sissy slut training!
th3w01fv2 2 years ago
Well he does seem to have a fixation on phallic-shaped fruit.
utukkuxul 2 years ago