Everyone, these are the most popular releases yet! The actual russian federal government actually opened up to public 3 hundred documents! They are on ufosecretXnet (replace X with . )
Note the RCS firing as Endeavour changes orientation.. that 'UFO' you see is ice and left over propellant from the shuttle. Very common and well explained by NASA PAO a few days ago when Atlantis did the same thing.
Stop with the semantic trickery. 'UFO' has unambiguous connotations of 'unexplainability', which are undeserved on these kinds of videos, because nobody has been able to perform normal, basic contextual research required before ANY report can be considered a 'real UFO'. Such research is frustrated by the refusal of the posters to provide checkable date/time hacks for the scenes, a gimmick to prevent the kinds of investigations which DO find the real explanations. Deception through coverup.
Note how it comes OUT of the payload bay -- mighty small "door"!! See at 1:01 it moves in FRONT of the LOMS pod.
Was it STS-61 or STS 61A, or 61B, or 61C? With actual ID and time/date, an investigator could find the technical context of the scene and maybe get a prosaic explanation -- but secretnasaman won't TELL you that data, maybe he's scared the answer is easy to find,
At 1:00 You see the object in FRONT of the pod, yes.. but if you look closer you can see that the object is not defined matter -- I would say IF this is ET and it could be for all we know.. it is not a 'physical spacecraft' as most imagine ET crafts to be. It could be an energetic field or astral form of some sort. I am saying that it also could be conscious.
If it isn't ET in nature, howcome it appears transparent and shape-shifting in the beginning, then turning another direction or morphing.
I think you're overinterpreting the features of the camera system, including image latency and low resolution. These are off-the-shelf B&W vidicon cameras whose purpose is to monitor payload and spacewalker activities, not make Hubble-quality observations. Even the stars are smeared out and fuzzy. More exotic explanations aren't justified, IMHO.
i believe that would be a refraction of light effect through the camera lense, something similar to a newton effect, or what you see in movies when the camera pans across a light source, only in this case you only catch a small snippet of it
Uh that did not look anything like a refraction. Did you actually watch it? Mind you I don't think it's a UFO either, probably just a bit of junk floating around.
a satelite maybe. the speakers rreaction is interesting they both both pause as it passes then he breaks the silence with, well any way... people in that position must see alot of stuff like this. just another UFO vid that kaes you wonder.
its flat as fuck it might be alien if their as thin as paper
ninggningedy 1 year ago
dont go to the site needforcabal is advertising its a scam.. its a phisher site
30secondstomarscam 1 year ago
this is obviously ice or other debris. getting excited over this makes other people look silly who point out other real events.
onebadmoto 1 year ago
Everyone, these are the most popular releases yet! The actual russian federal government actually opened up to public 3 hundred documents! They are on ufosecretXnet (replace X with . )
needforcabal 1 year ago
Note the RCS firing as Endeavour changes orientation.. that 'UFO' you see is ice and left over propellant from the shuttle. Very common and well explained by NASA PAO a few days ago when Atlantis did the same thing.
EndeavourLaunch 1 year ago
for me looks like a camera flare
sebastiansz 1 year ago
space junk , but it would be cool if there were a UFO out there.
airbrushbill 1 year ago
Thats DOCTOR WHOOO !!!! With HIS TARDIS !
makedonc5436 1 year ago
Obviously debris.
Kirke182 2 years ago
It is obviously a piece of space junk rotating as it drifts, not "morphing in shape" as some people suggest.
LittleHampie 2 years ago
Well i recognize orion there but, sorry to say but that looks like the concept of the imprisoned 3 from superman...or just a tile
Omexoplex 2 years ago
It remains a UFO unless someone know what it is, UFO does not mean its a alien spaceship people keep forgetting that.
legi0naire 2 years ago
Stop with the semantic trickery. 'UFO' has unambiguous connotations of 'unexplainability', which are undeserved on these kinds of videos, because nobody has been able to perform normal, basic contextual research required before ANY report can be considered a 'real UFO'. Such research is frustrated by the refusal of the posters to provide checkable date/time hacks for the scenes, a gimmick to prevent the kinds of investigations which DO find the real explanations. Deception through coverup.
JamesOberg 2 years ago
I wonder why the quality is allways so bad when it comes to prove crazy stuff
Bababatra 2 years ago
Someone dropped their wallet.
LeeMaple 2 years ago
Note how it comes OUT of the payload bay -- mighty small "door"!! See at 1:01 it moves in FRONT of the LOMS pod.
Was it STS-61 or STS 61A, or 61B, or 61C? With actual ID and time/date, an investigator could find the technical context of the scene and maybe get a prosaic explanation -- but secretnasaman won't TELL you that data, maybe he's scared the answer is easy to find,
JamesOberg 2 years ago
At 1:00 You see the object in FRONT of the pod, yes.. but if you look closer you can see that the object is not defined matter -- I would say IF this is ET and it could be for all we know.. it is not a 'physical spacecraft' as most imagine ET crafts to be. It could be an energetic field or astral form of some sort. I am saying that it also could be conscious.
If it isn't ET in nature, howcome it appears transparent and shape-shifting in the beginning, then turning another direction or morphing.
twohseven 2 years ago
I think you're overinterpreting the features of the camera system, including image latency and low resolution. These are off-the-shelf B&W vidicon cameras whose purpose is to monitor payload and spacewalker activities, not make Hubble-quality observations. Even the stars are smeared out and fuzzy. More exotic explanations aren't justified, IMHO.
JamesOberg 2 years ago
It's probably a piece of space junk. A part of a discarded satilite.
Rayman3424 2 years ago
It can't be space junk that close to a space station/shuttle because it would cause a major danger to people out there.
ShaCRaM 2 years ago 3
Tardis,,lol good one.
bigSSG 2 years ago
Its the body of hoffa!!
turgeo2009 2 years ago
i believe that would be a refraction of light effect through the camera lense, something similar to a newton effect, or what you see in movies when the camera pans across a light source, only in this case you only catch a small snippet of it
kctxsa 2 years ago
Uh that did not look anything like a refraction. Did you actually watch it? Mind you I don't think it's a UFO either, probably just a bit of junk floating around.
Vire70 2 years ago
no, i just reply casually to random videos without actually watching or reflecting on them. it's kind of my thing.
kctxsa 2 years ago
It's the tardis dummies.
astrochicken 2 years ago
That is the only logical conclusion.
bigpinkears 2 years ago
umm....my video never loads...
erboz 2 years ago
thanks for sharing
NYmothafucka 2 years ago
It's the toolbag. It went back in time!
Jeffydomer 2 years ago
It's the monolith from 2001!
...or space garbage.
hafabee 2 years ago
its a astroid
buttmedanbuttyou 2 years ago
flat asteroid ?
ShaCRaM 2 years ago 4
Santa's sleigh?
Magic carpet?
bigpinkears 2 years ago
a satelite maybe. the speakers rreaction is interesting they both both pause as it passes then he breaks the silence with, well any way... people in that position must see alot of stuff like this. just another UFO vid that kaes you wonder.
soviet86 2 years ago
Haha it does look like a door.
Looks lime some sort of debris certainly, anyone missing a door?
Mucky1little2me3 2 years ago 2