Added: 3 months ago
From: eyepatchentertainmen
Views: 2,652
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Easy: Screw the Canon, get a Nikon.

  • whats wrong with your fucking face

  • Interesting.

  • I try to get Neat Video but they told me this in an email >>>" Dear Sir, Unfortunately, Neat Video products are currently not available for technical reasons. SWREG will refund the payment for the order you have placed. Please accept our apology for the inconvenience." Best regards,

    Alex

  • MARK

  • @gatler05 Whoa bro

  • @eyepatchentertainmen I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE

  • I already try it, because I only got a kit lens. And usually on night shots I work with ISO 6400, so my footage it's basically a noise festival. Neat Video works pretty well for me. I will try your settings. Great tutorial BTW!.

  • Nice tutorial! I think post production noise is sometimes very important. Especially for still frames. It gives the image some sort of life. Without extra noise a viewer can probably spot a still image and most of the time it's not what I want the viewer to do.

  • I thought this was really helpful even though to my eye, the original image looked better than the remastered image. Sorry about that. The thing that really threw me off was the rectangular flare-space in the lower right-hand corner. As I listened and watched this video, I found myself thinking about this issue in terms of the AVCHD codec my Pana HMC150 employs to create the grainiest images on the planet! I'm hoping you'll make a brief video about fixing AVCHD grain-problems. Thanks!

  • Please add an anotation that tells you to switch to 1080p playback. Than the viewers are really able to see the noise.

  • The unfixed footage kind of looked like Super 8 to my untrained eye. I actually liked the way it looked. The fixed footage looks great though. Thanks for the tips.

  • I use these technics i photoshop. And they work well too.

  • Great tip Mark.

  • thanks for the video ! That lens flare idea is a great one!! I have a question, I can open to 1.4 (canon FD) on a GH1, but it lacks a lot of details (night setup), would it be better to go higher on iso and use neat video, or would it lack even more details because of the removed noise. I use the hack that mostly provides a lot of details. Do you think I'd have more details with a GH2 for night shots? Thank you in advance !

  • @NfectMedia If the lens is really bad I'd stick to 1.8 or f2, but almost always having the lens wide open is preferable to upping the ISO. On the Gh1 in particular, in order to avoid FPN at high ISOs, you should always have a light in your scene that reaches 100% exposure. (ex: a lampost with the light in the shot)

  • @eyepatchentertainmen thanks a lot for the answer !

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more