I try to get Neat Video but they told me this in an email >>>" Dear Sir, Unfortunately, Neat Video products are currently not available for technical reasons. SWREG will refund the payment for the order you have placed. Please accept our apology for the inconvenience." Best regards,
I already try it, because I only got a kit lens. And usually on night shots I work with ISO 6400, so my footage it's basically a noise festival. Neat Video works pretty well for me. I will try your settings. Great tutorial BTW!.
Nice tutorial! I think post production noise is sometimes very important. Especially for still frames. It gives the image some sort of life. Without extra noise a viewer can probably spot a still image and most of the time it's not what I want the viewer to do.
I thought this was really helpful even though to my eye, the original image looked better than the remastered image. Sorry about that. The thing that really threw me off was the rectangular flare-space in the lower right-hand corner. As I listened and watched this video, I found myself thinking about this issue in terms of the AVCHD codec my Pana HMC150 employs to create the grainiest images on the planet! I'm hoping you'll make a brief video about fixing AVCHD grain-problems. Thanks!
The unfixed footage kind of looked like Super 8 to my untrained eye. I actually liked the way it looked. The fixed footage looks great though. Thanks for the tips.
thanks for the video ! That lens flare idea is a great one!! I have a question, I can open to 1.4 (canon FD) on a GH1, but it lacks a lot of details (night setup), would it be better to go higher on iso and use neat video, or would it lack even more details because of the removed noise. I use the hack that mostly provides a lot of details. Do you think I'd have more details with a GH2 for night shots? Thank you in advance !
@NfectMedia If the lens is really bad I'd stick to 1.8 or f2, but almost always having the lens wide open is preferable to upping the ISO. On the Gh1 in particular, in order to avoid FPN at high ISOs, you should always have a light in your scene that reaches 100% exposure. (ex: a lampost with the light in the shot)
Easy: Screw the Canon, get a Nikon.
Gidenkidenk 3 weeks ago
whats wrong with your fucking face
bomankeith 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wowww!i love the quality of images of this
camera :)! Do you know you can make Time
Lapse Photography with this camera?
These guys have an infrared time-lapse
remote for NIKON cameras with infared, and
for every major brand of cameras! Check the
website: tempus.bymac.org
bymacorg3 2 months ago
Interesting.
kookiemoose 2 months ago
I try to get Neat Video but they told me this in an email >>>" Dear Sir, Unfortunately, Neat Video products are currently not available for technical reasons. SWREG will refund the payment for the order you have placed. Please accept our apology for the inconvenience." Best regards,
Alex
Savor1979 3 months ago
MARK
gatler05 3 months ago
@gatler05 Whoa bro
eyepatchentertainmen 3 months ago
@eyepatchentertainmen I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE
gatler05 3 months ago
I already try it, because I only got a kit lens. And usually on night shots I work with ISO 6400, so my footage it's basically a noise festival. Neat Video works pretty well for me. I will try your settings. Great tutorial BTW!.
bruno70 3 months ago
Nice tutorial! I think post production noise is sometimes very important. Especially for still frames. It gives the image some sort of life. Without extra noise a viewer can probably spot a still image and most of the time it's not what I want the viewer to do.
Bauzi514 3 months ago
I thought this was really helpful even though to my eye, the original image looked better than the remastered image. Sorry about that. The thing that really threw me off was the rectangular flare-space in the lower right-hand corner. As I listened and watched this video, I found myself thinking about this issue in terms of the AVCHD codec my Pana HMC150 employs to create the grainiest images on the planet! I'm hoping you'll make a brief video about fixing AVCHD grain-problems. Thanks!
MobileMediaProducts 3 months ago
Please add an anotation that tells you to switch to 1080p playback. Than the viewers are really able to see the noise.
Bauzi514 3 months ago
The unfixed footage kind of looked like Super 8 to my untrained eye. I actually liked the way it looked. The fixed footage looks great though. Thanks for the tips.
ar4216 3 months ago
I use these technics i photoshop. And they work well too.
sirnubenegra 3 months ago
Great tip Mark.
mp4podcastDOTcom 3 months ago
thanks for the video ! That lens flare idea is a great one!! I have a question, I can open to 1.4 (canon FD) on a GH1, but it lacks a lot of details (night setup), would it be better to go higher on iso and use neat video, or would it lack even more details because of the removed noise. I use the hack that mostly provides a lot of details. Do you think I'd have more details with a GH2 for night shots? Thank you in advance !
NfectMedia 3 months ago
@NfectMedia If the lens is really bad I'd stick to 1.8 or f2, but almost always having the lens wide open is preferable to upping the ISO. On the Gh1 in particular, in order to avoid FPN at high ISOs, you should always have a light in your scene that reaches 100% exposure. (ex: a lampost with the light in the shot)
eyepatchentertainmen 3 months ago
@eyepatchentertainmen thanks a lot for the answer !
NfectMedia 3 months ago