they hang suspended, people ... thats impossible, whats that tell you? Wires possibly? ... how about all times the nauts fall and dont worry about it? such as these examples....
1. hammer on nauts foot, hey no prob, no one's worried about puncture and death!!!
watch?v=GmcTYq8Xh7k
2. nauts goes down hard, hey no prob! bounce up, don't even inspect your uni!
40 лет не было этого клипа, а тут появился как по заказу, целых 43 секунды сняли. Интересно на чем они там прыгают, на батуте что ли? А что там на заднем плане? Гора что ли? По моему возле горы прилунился Аполлон-15.
@stalkervision Oh, and by the way, take a look at the jump on 0:15 - based on his helmet I would estimate the height of that jump to be around 80 centimeters, and the time it takes for him to land is 1,0 seconds.
This means that g in the formula g = 2h / t² should equal somewhere close to 1,62, which is the moon's gravitational acceleration; so let's try that --- g = 2*0,80 / 1,0² = 1,6.
Would you look at that?! Even MATH supports the moon landing footage!
@stalkervision Okay, and what about 10-20 years later from now? When they will most likely have made a telescope that can actually show the lunar lander in detail?
Do you seriously think that NASA are just sitting around hoping that nobody will ever "find out they were lying" and somehow manage to play extremely calm the whole time?
And how do you explain the pitch-black sky depsite great sunshine?
@stalkervision Then why the hell would NASA perform these high jumps in front of live cameras and for the whole world AND release it for all the world to see if it was so "bogus"?
Anyone interested in physics could've pointed it out anytime!
You also need to explain what exactly NASA would earn from "faking" a moon landing and feeling proud of it if it would be found out in the near future, with powerful enough telescopes, that "there's no lunar lander" on the moon anyway.
@stalkervision When they did the "jump salute" they were only intending to make a salute while jumping, and they still managed to get 1,3 feet up in the air, which is impossible on Earth if you weigh around 360-380 pounds.
In this video they use all their force to jump as high as possible; this is like making a regular jump on Earth and then suddenly trying to jump as high as you can.
@0:17 the Astronaut doesn't bend his knees at all, and is suddenly 20+ inches in the air... this is completely inconsistent with the Salute jump, where John Young bends his knees almost as far as the suit would allow, and doesn't go any higher than a person jumping in Earth gravity. If this is a video of real Astronauts, doing real jumps on the moon, then I'll eat my own penis. This is fake.
@shanehoustein The moon landings have been confirmed for over 40 years by rocket scientists and space engineers all over the world, even by RUSSIAN scientists.
Deniers have an agenda the precludes the consideration of facts. Their minds simply aren't formatted to require facts to support their need to pursue their agenda. Nothing about the deniers is unique or surprising. They like many others are dragged by the nose by well spoken others who desire their support in the form of cash or supportive rhetoric.
kinda of a stupid thing to do on the moon being so risky an all, why didnt they just fake it on earth? were they stupid enough to try that shit on the moon?
@datzfast Apparently they were. Its funny, conspiracy theorists complain don't do the massive jumps they imagine are possible in 1/6th g, ignoring the mass and stiffness of the suits, and yet when astronauts do smaller, but still unearthly, jumps with these kinds of results, they also complain.
@loperspest your right. this jump is convincing if it was not faked. its high enough not to be earth. but only if they arent suspended on a wire. thats why i think its dumb to say this is any proof we landed on the moon. hollywood would cosider this an easy stunt with absolutly no CGI needed. i would rater see high resolution photos of shit left on the moon as proof, but hell even that could be faked by holly wood. so were stuck with asking the astronauts about stars.
@datzfast Wires wouldn't allow a pendulum to swing longer then in air or earth gravity.
/watch?v=01A61jra37o
/watch?v=kojsfbN8ulc
It also wouldn't allow thrown objects to follow a trjactury consistant with lunar gravity.
watch?v=NxZMjpMhwNE
The stars argument is silly. One, you try seen stars in a sunlit enviroment. Two, some Apollo photos do show stars, both sets use long exposure times, so the reason CT give why stars weren't added if they should be there, too hard to fake, doesn't add up.
@loperspest The problem with hoax believers is that they flat out *refuse* to believe the moonlanding footage is authentic - no matter what proof they get, they will always be like "no that's not real, show me proof today!!!1!onetwo!!".
@Laurelindo other side of the fence is... the problem with those that believe we went to the moon, they are so single minded they even sit there and debunk scientific fact and start saying its all wrong, so it kind of works both ways..
Your comment alone is enough to suggest you would not even seriously consider it was a fake even if Neil Armstrong told you so....
This video is a fake, proof is not someone jumping on a trampoline hidden from view behind another object..get real
People saw the lift-off in real life with their own eyes, and the astronauts recorded lots of scenes from the lunar module - none of that footage has been proven "fake" a single time.
Then the astronauts return to Earth with several sacks of moon dust, and that sand has been verified many times.
Do you reallly think they were so stupid that they used Earth sand and thought "oh yeah, let's use this sand, it's safe, they will never realize it's from Earth"?
@Laurelindo Yea people saw a rocket life off there is no question about that, but less than 50 miles its out of sight.
Pay a group of scientists to come up with a conclusion and that is what they do.
Look at the legal system of people on trial for murder, the defence expert and prosecution expert who are both scientific experts come up with different conclusions. one is to prove they did something, the other to prove they didn't. thats what they are paid for..
@kevinturvy Nobody denies that you can't see the rocket with your naked eyes for very long, but if they were just floating around in space ("to account for their disappearance" as Bill Kaysing puts it) they would've instantly been tracked and found- heck, even a powerful telescope could see them in the middle of the Van Allen belt - and even if they would've been able to hide it would still be almost impossible, especially on a first try, and several times on all the other moon landings.
@Laurelindo Although in this video do you not find it odd that we never see there feet, just the tops of there legs, if you saw a guy floating in mid air on stage but his legs were hidden by a box would you not think it was a trick and assume it is just standing on a platform or jumping on a trampoline:)
@kevinturvy No, they show the exactly same demonstration in other videos, and you can see their feet there - and yes, 15-16 inches IS very high if you do it almost without bending your knees and with a heavy spacesuit and a heavy packback on; on Earth you can barely jump 16 inches even when you do push off and don't have any extra weight.
Try it yourself: how high can you jump if you don't bend your knees that much?
@Laurelindo How high could i jump without bending my knees, well i could elevate myself 10 inches just by standing on my tip toes, so 16 inches should be easy, and as for wearing a back pack etc... well i dont have the advantage of 1/6 gravity, but if i did it would be pretty easy
I don't believe this is real because in a real, scary situation you'd hear like, "oh shit, I fell down" And "fuck man, be careful" and "fuck off it wasn't on purpose, dickshit"
This is so obvious how these astro-nots r being jerked up by wires-they don't even control their own hands while jumping.lol Nice hiding behind all the equipment too guys
makes t harder to see u with my dears.Phoney shit.
What fucking bullshit-These assholes r only jumping about 2 feet into the air-not 4 feet
They should have been able to jump alot higher than that if they were really on the moon. Love the way they jump with all the equipment in the way blocking the view.
If that was the case, why didn't they do what Hollywood does in the event of a mistake during shooting, a retake. He is off balance because of the mass of the PLSS affecting his centre of gravity.
Well, then, in your experience, why didn't they do a retake? Cirque De Soleil is in front of live audience, but any movie maker, if this really was fake, should have done a retake. So why didn't they?
@loperspest Cirque de Soleil...... I rig wires for astro-nots so they can perform Moon Olympics. lol My next show is going to be called Moon-Nots.....watch for it.
@loperspest it's been fun making u think i work for the circus-lol Which just goes to show MOON-TARDS will believe ANYTHING- just like we went to the moon-LOL Biggest LIE & Hoax of all time. LOL
@loperspest And you are a gullible,believe anything that anyone says which in itself,
is ignorance personified. LOL
we never ever went to the moon.-this is all braindead fakeshit.people in the 60's were gullible fools who still believed the government wouldn't lie to them-experiment ON them,feed them LSD,watch them die of syphilis,or spray them with germs.lol Boy were they wrong. lol
What I meant, and I am pretty sure you know this, was that you are ignorant on one of the methods used to simulate flight or similar effects on film and stage, wire work. Since you are, and have admitted so, why should I trust your word when you say the astronauts were on wires?
As for evils the US government has done, the USSR weren't sunshine and roses either. They were worse in fact.
Should this be a reason to discard their commendable space achievements as 'fake' or 'hoax'?
@loperspest Please stop the bullshit.The VAB wasn't safe then & it's not safe now.
We never went to the moon at all genius. BTW u will never ever convince me that anyone ever went to the moon.Just looking at the fucking LEM tells me that.Give up.
It's not bullshit, it's Russian scientists own studies of the Van Allen belt.
As for the LM, Lunar Excursion Module was discarded as its title early on in the development process.
It doesn't need to be aerodynamic because it was never meant to re-enter an atmosphere. The gold foil covering is to reflect heat, the wrinkles keep contact with the subsurface to a minimum, minimizing conduction. Other spacecraft do the same thing.
@loperspest the wrinkles keep contact with the subsurface to a minimum, minimizing conduction.= LOL U r like a fucking parrot for Nasa-the ones who faked all this apollo shit t beginwith. lol Polly want a cracker? lol
Did you even look at the photo of the Indian Space Research Organisation Chandrayaan lunar orbiter?
It has the same wrinkled foil exterior, for the exact same reasons. Aluminized Mylar has high reflectivity, and by minimizing the points it touches the interior, you minimize the amount of heat that leaks in of the minimum that is absorbed in the first place.
Just because you are ignorant of passive thermal control doesn't mean everyone is.
@loperspest LOL Yeah let me roll up some toilet paper after i wipe my ass and stick it to the LEM & tell you it's a refractive lens material cover that has a hyperbolic coating on it to prevent light reflection & refraction & to sensitive the meter for the reading of thermal waves while the lem is in orbit. LOL YOU'D FUCKING BELIEVE IT. LOL
@loperspest Fake hoax of the century.Blackmail the russians with Gagarin who was never in the russian rocket & tell them to shut up about apollo never going to the moon. The russians r happy & so r the dumb fuck americans.1969 People were really really dumb & the government had them so fucking brainwashed -they would believe anything. LOL
If Gagarin wasn't in the rocket, why decades later reveal that the reentery didn't go as smoothly as once claimed, with the service module not detaching until the wires burned though, or that Gagarin ejected from his capsule before landing, contrary to older claims.
In your scenario if Gagarin didn't fly, these would also be lies. Why would the USSR do that?
As for what you say about the US government, so? I'm not saying that's not terrible, but I don't see what it has to do with Apollo.
It was early days yet for space flight, Errors occurred. Mercury-Atlas 7 was over 400 kilometres off course, no one saw that splash down either. Was Scott Carpenters flight a hoax? And you still haven't explained why if they were lying why they would invent decades later more damaging lies?
You also still haven't explained what you meant by 'impossibly fake connections'.
@loperspest I was talking about the fake cardboard looking sides of the LEM & all those fake rocket nozzles all around that fake bullshit Lunar Module.Come on- how the fuck did they even rendez-vous with the CM with no GPS- no real radar on the LEM no way of even hooking up-all BULLSHIT. What did they do say-READY,SET,GO
Where are you getting your 'facts' that the LM didn't have rendezvous radar? And if you don't believe me that the outer wasn't pressurized, look at this photo of the LM ascent stage during construction.
And if Vostok and Mercury programs were hoaxes, where did NASA get the experience to build the Space Shuttle and Soyuz? Are they hoaxes too, or are you just going to claim I am lying again?
. Your 'point' seems to be to claim any evidence against your case you can't explain is bullshit or lies, despite not providing any evidence that is in fact the case.
Logically, this is known as the Bare Assertion Fallacy. I got the title wrong last time I mentioned it, saying 'base' instead of 'bare', but you still seem to be continuing with it.
No, those are claimed to be wires, yet I have yet to see evidence that it is not simply the result of being in one sixth gravity. The 'pings'? They had antennas on their PLSS.
Neither wires nor slow down can explain the evidence of vacuum and lesser gravity seen in the following video. In a desperate attempt to explain it, one conspiracy theorist claimed they moved their arms 'really fast'. Yeah, and I bet that's how they did at the end of the Benny Hill show.
Yes, and they are in similar lighting conditions in a lot of videos, using the same camera. Why should it be surprising there should be a lot of lens flare?
Why is the 'fake blast off' 'ridiculous'? You do know that the Apollo LM used a specific blend of hypergolic fuels whose exhaust in main sequence is transparent? The Delta 2 rocket uses the exact same fuel and oxidiser and you see the same thing.
That so totally shows what a fake apollo was-it's ridiculous.
$2,000,000 Moon Globes with Track for cameras to film the fake Moon Ladings. LOL
Then destroyed after apollo's fakes are finished.Tricky Dick resigns-end of apollo hoaxes. LOL PS-U will never ever ever convince me of any moon landings so u might as well give up.We never went to the moon lol
They were used during flight training. A camera tried to controls in a simulator would 'fly' over the simulated terrain, in this case a lunar globe, playing on screens in the 'windows'.
Contemporary flight simulators did the same thing.
From a distance it does indeed look like the moon. But comparing close ups with close ups of the moon taken by Apollo shows the lack of detail in the model.
Also, Nixon resigned in Aug. 74, Apollo 17 flew in Dec. 72. I don't see the connection.
@ed11561 I only skimmed the first 30 seconds and it's ludicrous. Have you ever been to night practise in a sports field? All those different light sources in separate locations mean multiple shadows criss crossing each other at angles. This not seen in Apollo photos.
It should be quite obvious what it is, lens flare.
If it was multiple lights, how come there isn't multiple shadows? And if they were lights, how come no one on the alleged hoax production team noticed? Airbrushing lights out of black sky would probably be the easiest thing in the world, you could probably do it in MS-Paint.
@loperspest actually download any NASA photo and play around with the contrast and shit and interesting square boxes and blocks start showing up in the black space sky. almost like they were to cheap to work it out the hard way in the development bath so they did it on the actual photograph. i have done this for myself after some one showed me how on you tube.
@loperspest naw i dont need to, i could have invented jpeg compression, so i understand it. it simple. and your right to a certain extent. i would never claim we didnt visit the moon based on photo evidence because it really is an object image and not a virtual image.
@cadu1995 Well, as you admitted yourself, you will never be convinced we landed on the moon. Spoken by a true believer, no amount of evidence will ever persuade you otherwise. You need to honestly take a step back and look at the statement you just made. When it comes to the point where you will ignore all evidence that doesn't support your position, you are truly lost.
@ajhick2 The EVIDENCE i've seen is bullshit.When i see real film footage of a conceivable moon landing THEN i'll believe but they were already caught faking shit.
Outright forgery in the CMsupposedly going to the moon.Funny how Kaguya & LRO
@ed11561 So, when you see something you don't believe is convincing evidence you just say you don't like it and that's it? No science? No concrete rebuttal? It just doesn't look real to you? Wow, brilliant. You make it an easy job for those of us who believe and can demonstrate the historicity of Apollo.
@ed11561 they did too, they proved with a one meter ground resolution you can see boot trials when the boots are just 6 inches wide. of course you cant do that on earth photographs but this is the moon god damn it and its a special place.
@datzfast they did too, they proved with a one meter ground resolution you can see boot trials when the boots are just 6 inches wide. of course you cant do that on earth photographs but this is the moon god damn it and its a special place.
LOL TOTAL BULLSHIT. Wake the fuck up moron-we never ever ever went to any moon.They would have been fried like calamari dummy. lol Nevermind-go back to sleep.
@loperspest The recent Falcon-9 launch was unusual in having an upper stage burn kerosene/LOX. Most upper stages burn LH2/LOX or hypergols, known to have plumes that are nearly invisible even in air. But guess what - Falcon showed that, in a vacuum, even kerosene/LOX rockets have invisible plumes!
It's classic. When an Apollo denier sees something that defies his intuition, it must be faked; his intuition could never be wrong!
@loperspest 1969 The US shot Plutonium in the arms of people-gave them LSD-Watched as they died of syphillis & didn't give them the cure.Spread germs & virus' in the NYC subway system-sprayed chemicals in NYC thru cars exhaust pipes.Told us saccahrine & tobaco were good for us.Sprayed DDTon school kids in playgrounds.
total bs. there is something fishy. if it was 1/6th gravity when astronauts fell they should easily be able to pick up them selves with 1 hand. im talking about the first appllo mission. and now they can jump 4 feet.
TeamDarkMatter, no matter where they are, getting up wearing a bulky, stiff, pressurized suit is not going to be easy. It's like wearing your own space ship!
stargazn00, first of all, the "first apollo mission" was an unmanned test of a Saturn 1b rocket. Second, the goal of the first spacewalk was not to see how high one can jump. Just because one can jump 4 feet doesn't mean one always will or always should!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
greenmagoos is right- at 0.19 the astronaut 'pings' up in the air without moving his arms or legs. He just shoots up into the air. Watch and see it for yourself.
Theres millions of real events televised in the world and people dont pick holes in them, theres a good reason why people pick holes in the lunar missions , it's because their are so many flaws in them. Watch "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" for more info.
"Watch "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" for more info. "
One thing you will not get from "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon" is "info". A good laugh, possibly. A demonstration of extreme stupidity, certainly. A perfect illustration of why people with no scientific understanding whatsoever should not attempt to comment on scientific matters, absolutely. But "info"? No.
Did it ever occur to you that his arms and legs don't move that much because he's in a big bulky spacesuit that is restricting his motion? Moontard logic is amusing.
Astronauts fall over all the time in films and they don't show any concern, the don't check their backpacks either.
The Astronaut on the left clearly looks under the influence of a wire when he falls.
.
Why are photos and films so limited in the landscape they show, why didn't one of the astronauts get to a high point and show a large area of land, theres aways hills in the near horizon, where are the photos or film of craters at ground level?
They don't usually fall on their backpacks from four feet in the air.
Watch the other footage of astronauts falling over on the moon (e.g. Dave Scott tripping over a rock in the Apollo 15 footage). They twist their bodies as they fall, to avoid landing on their backpacks, and the moon's gravity usually allows them time to do it. Here, Charlie Duke overbalances and can't right himself, and lands pretty heavily on his back. He was right to be scared.
Not necessarily the near horizon. Those hills could be mountains three hundred miles away for all you know - the moon's empty landscape makes it impossible to judge distance.
They couldn't land the lunar module on the side of a hill because it might overbalance, and they couldn't use the rover to climb up the side of mountains. But Apollo 15 landed in Hadley Rille, and Apollo 16 landed in the lunar highlands. Try looking into these missions...
Of course, lunatic conspiracy theorists, as always, will do their best to use it to support their empty theory. Once they claim astronauts never jumped high enough, then when they actually see they did, CTs say it's fake.
There is no evidence here or in any other scene in Apollo footage that any wire supports were used.
All moving objects, including tools, pieces of foil dropped or thrown, and dust, behave consistently with Moon's environment.
The moon's gravity is about 1/6 that of earth. Someone wearing a 380 pound backpack can't jump a foot on earth, so why shold they be able to jump 6 feet on the moon?
Show me a photo taken from Earth orbit with an exposure time equal to Apollo with stars in it. Possibly, but Shaq is also at least a foot taller, trained most of his life to jump, and not wearing a spacesuit with equal his dry weight and mass on his back.
Well, I guess the guy manning the alleged studio wires was sleeping on the job.
Serious, Charlie Duke is one of my favorite astronauts. He's a good ol' boy with a very down to earth, sensible way of describing things. This was awesome.
What makes the Moon Hoax Believers tick? First and foremost...they want to sound smart. They want to feel important. They want to be respected. All day they carefully monitor their favorite YT Hoax clips, and when they see one of their supporters chiming in, their heart skips a beat with joy. They absolutely beam with pride thinking they are taking on the Evil NASA Establishment and winning!!!! LOL!!! TOO funny. What a bunch of losers.
Hoax Believers are perfect examples of Scientific Illiterates who think they'll be big heroes by finding the NASA "smoking gun". In reality...most Hoax Believers are simply frustrated by their own insignificance and failures. Sadly...because Mommy always told them how smart they were, they can't transition to the real world. In the adult realm, the typical Hoaxer is unable to function. Only on the internet, can a Hoaxer feel a little success. Said it before...Hoax Believers are simply losers.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hmmm...Wires come to mind! Then, when you watch this in light of panner excuses that the astronots couldn't jump very high because of their backpacks. Well, they come out as double-talking, back-peddling, bullshit artists that they are!
"Wires come to mind" Good idea. Electroconvulsive Therapy might work on you, un4g1v3n1. Although it works best on manic depressives, apparently there has been some success in treating those such as you who have psychotic delusions and paranoia. Give it a try, un4g1v3n1. It certainly couldn't make you any worse.
Is that how they were able to treat you? Hmm...it didn't work...You still believe in Santa Clause...How is it working in his shop with the other elves?
Sorry. Don't believe in Santa. I believe the dust particles that appear when I use flash photography are fifth dimensional beings or creatures of the multiverse No, wait... I don't believe that; YOU do. My bad.
You don't have a clue what I believe in that respect. I've only provided a video for consideration. If you wish to write every one of every persons photos and videos off to dust, that would just be more of your fear, and lack of proper investigation showing your ugly, scared, little boy self. It's people like you that scoffed at the idea of germs and atoms years and years ago. Keep scoffing. It's the unhealthy skeptics best friend.
Thanks for providing that video for consideration ...and for posting the reply from a trained photographer who clearly explains the cause which you summarily dismiss. Their reply: "the truth is, you seem to be the close-minded one - refusing to believe any simple, factual explanations." They certainly pegged you on that one. Thanks, but I'll keep scoffing if you don't mind.
Why don't you try and defend these antics by the Apollonots...This anot is such a liar. Fear. How can he fear when he is obviously on a moon set, and not the moon at all. Apollogists said over and over again the reason the anots never reached any great heights was because of the bulk and weight of their packs. Once this video was revealed, they flip flopped faster than politicians on ice! You want to flip flop with them. Scoffing is all you have!
/watch?v=AYWIJwo2SLk
i think we got a "little" problem here))))
DEHUCOK 2 months ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 6 days ago
The best mission of Apollo program :) the John e Charlie show
TheArmstrong1969 3 months ago
@stalkervision ... check out my post on top of this thread, thanks to LT, I found this joke of a clip and debunked it with 2 clips of my own.
pt1gard 4 months ago
they hang suspended, people ... thats impossible, whats that tell you? Wires possibly? ... how about all times the nauts fall and dont worry about it? such as these examples....
1. hammer on nauts foot, hey no prob, no one's worried about puncture and death!!!
watch?v=GmcTYq8Xh7k
2. nauts goes down hard, hey no prob! bounce up, don't even inspect your uni!
watch?v=IbYUj1L2J-0
pt1gard 4 months ago
40 лет не было этого клипа, а тут появился как по заказу, целых 43 секунды сняли. Интересно на чем они там прыгают, на батуте что ли? А что там на заднем плане? Гора что ли? По моему возле горы прилунился Аполлон-15.
1978Ivanov 4 months ago
@stalkervision Oh, and by the way, take a look at the jump on 0:15 - based on his helmet I would estimate the height of that jump to be around 80 centimeters, and the time it takes for him to land is 1,0 seconds.
This means that g in the formula g = 2h / t² should equal somewhere close to 1,62, which is the moon's gravitational acceleration; so let's try that --- g = 2*0,80 / 1,0² = 1,6.
Would you look at that?! Even MATH supports the moon landing footage!
jahajahaga 5 months ago
@stalkervision Okay, and what about 10-20 years later from now? When they will most likely have made a telescope that can actually show the lunar lander in detail?
Do you seriously think that NASA are just sitting around hoping that nobody will ever "find out they were lying" and somehow manage to play extremely calm the whole time?
And how do you explain the pitch-black sky depsite great sunshine?
Or the absence of heat waves?
jahajahaga 5 months ago
@stalkervision Then why the hell would NASA perform these high jumps in front of live cameras and for the whole world AND release it for all the world to see if it was so "bogus"?
Anyone interested in physics could've pointed it out anytime!
You also need to explain what exactly NASA would earn from "faking" a moon landing and feeling proud of it if it would be found out in the near future, with powerful enough telescopes, that "there's no lunar lander" on the moon anyway.
Laurelindo 5 months ago
@stalkervision When they did the "jump salute" they were only intending to make a salute while jumping, and they still managed to get 1,3 feet up in the air, which is impossible on Earth if you weigh around 360-380 pounds.
In this video they use all their force to jump as high as possible; this is like making a regular jump on Earth and then suddenly trying to jump as high as you can.
Laurelindo 5 months ago
@0:17 the Astronaut doesn't bend his knees at all, and is suddenly 20+ inches in the air... this is completely inconsistent with the Salute jump, where John Young bends his knees almost as far as the suit would allow, and doesn't go any higher than a person jumping in Earth gravity. If this is a video of real Astronauts, doing real jumps on the moon, then I'll eat my own penis. This is fake.
shanehoustein 7 months ago
@shanehoustein The moon landings have been confirmed for over 40 years by rocket scientists and space engineers all over the world, even by RUSSIAN scientists.
Laurelindo 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
See here.
Apollo 11 One small step - From the beginning - NASA 1969 watch?v=0SAwcF8LVFQ
Restored Apollo 11 Mission - NASA Goddard Space Flight Center watch?v=WblNjNlDnWM
Apollo 15 Lift off
watch?v=2xQMCGA9nCM
Apollo 11 Moon: Lunar TV Camera 1969 First Moon Landing
watch?v=l0NcOWnhgNI
OVERLOADInformation 9 months ago
Funny how you do not see there feet or the trampoline being obscured by the L.E.M.
Any idea where this was filmed
kevinturvy 9 months ago
Never have seen this one,whata' jewel, Duke is the man.
.
How many hoaxers' does it take to make a hoax video? Answer: 10, one to make the video, nine to say they could have done it better.
Tweekerhead 9 months ago
Surprise at 0:16, he thought he was done jumping. What jerked him up like that?
deadlyradiation 10 months ago
@deadlyradiation You have to be kidding me.. he jumped on his own, he just did it off the back off his foot it seems.
AgrivatedKillah 9 months ago
@AgrivatedKillah Yeah it's normal to jump higher without using your toes. lol Try thinking about what you say before you type it.
deadlyradiation 9 months ago
Deniers have an agenda the precludes the consideration of facts. Their minds simply aren't formatted to require facts to support their need to pursue their agenda. Nothing about the deniers is unique or surprising. They like many others are dragged by the nose by well spoken others who desire their support in the form of cash or supportive rhetoric.
slump75 11 months ago
When astronauts don't jump high enough, hoax believers say they should've been able to jump 6x higher on the Moon...
When the astronauts jump high enough, as seen in this scene, hoax believers say it was a trick and wire supports were used...
There is no end to hoax lunacy for those who believe it fanatically. Whatever arguments are shown to them, they just "know" it was a hoax...
In reality, all it takes to realize it was filmed on the Moon is knowledge of high school physics.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
kinda of a stupid thing to do on the moon being so risky an all, why didnt they just fake it on earth? were they stupid enough to try that shit on the moon?
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast Apparently they were. Its funny, conspiracy theorists complain don't do the massive jumps they imagine are possible in 1/6th g, ignoring the mass and stiffness of the suits, and yet when astronauts do smaller, but still unearthly, jumps with these kinds of results, they also complain.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest your right. this jump is convincing if it was not faked. its high enough not to be earth. but only if they arent suspended on a wire. thats why i think its dumb to say this is any proof we landed on the moon. hollywood would cosider this an easy stunt with absolutly no CGI needed. i would rater see high resolution photos of shit left on the moon as proof, but hell even that could be faked by holly wood. so were stuck with asking the astronauts about stars.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast Wires wouldn't allow a pendulum to swing longer then in air or earth gravity.
/watch?v=01A61jra37o
/watch?v=kojsfbN8ulc
It also wouldn't allow thrown objects to follow a trjactury consistant with lunar gravity.
watch?v=NxZMjpMhwNE
The stars argument is silly. One, you try seen stars in a sunlit enviroment. Two, some Apollo photos do show stars, both sets use long exposure times, so the reason CT give why stars weren't added if they should be there, too hard to fake, doesn't add up.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest The problem with hoax believers is that they flat out *refuse* to believe the moonlanding footage is authentic - no matter what proof they get, they will always be like "no that's not real, show me proof today!!!1!onetwo!!".
It's getting kind of old, really. <_<
Laurelindo 11 months ago 2
@Laurelindo other side of the fence is... the problem with those that believe we went to the moon, they are so single minded they even sit there and debunk scientific fact and start saying its all wrong, so it kind of works both ways..
Your comment alone is enough to suggest you would not even seriously consider it was a fake even if Neil Armstrong told you so....
This video is a fake, proof is not someone jumping on a trampoline hidden from view behind another object..get real
kevinturvy 9 months ago
@kevinturvy What "scientific fact"?
People saw the lift-off in real life with their own eyes, and the astronauts recorded lots of scenes from the lunar module - none of that footage has been proven "fake" a single time.
Then the astronauts return to Earth with several sacks of moon dust, and that sand has been verified many times.
Do you reallly think they were so stupid that they used Earth sand and thought "oh yeah, let's use this sand, it's safe, they will never realize it's from Earth"?
Laurelindo 9 months ago
@Laurelindo Yea people saw a rocket life off there is no question about that, but less than 50 miles its out of sight.
Pay a group of scientists to come up with a conclusion and that is what they do.
Look at the legal system of people on trial for murder, the defence expert and prosecution expert who are both scientific experts come up with different conclusions. one is to prove they did something, the other to prove they didn't. thats what they are paid for..
Just a thought, i was not there
kevinturvy 9 months ago
@kevinturvy Nobody denies that you can't see the rocket with your naked eyes for very long, but if they were just floating around in space ("to account for their disappearance" as Bill Kaysing puts it) they would've instantly been tracked and found- heck, even a powerful telescope could see them in the middle of the Van Allen belt - and even if they would've been able to hide it would still be almost impossible, especially on a first try, and several times on all the other moon landings.
Laurelindo 9 months ago
@Laurelindo Although in this video do you not find it odd that we never see there feet, just the tops of there legs, if you saw a guy floating in mid air on stage but his legs were hidden by a box would you not think it was a trick and assume it is just standing on a platform or jumping on a trampoline:)
kevinturvy 9 months ago
@kevinturvy No, they show the exactly same demonstration in other videos, and you can see their feet there - and yes, 15-16 inches IS very high if you do it almost without bending your knees and with a heavy spacesuit and a heavy packback on; on Earth you can barely jump 16 inches even when you do push off and don't have any extra weight.
Try it yourself: how high can you jump if you don't bend your knees that much?
Certainly not 16 inches.
Laurelindo 9 months ago
@Laurelindo How high could i jump without bending my knees, well i could elevate myself 10 inches just by standing on my tip toes, so 16 inches should be easy, and as for wearing a back pack etc... well i dont have the advantage of 1/6 gravity, but if i did it would be pretty easy
kevinturvy 9 months ago
I don't believe this is real because in a real, scary situation you'd hear like, "oh shit, I fell down" And "fuck man, be careful" and "fuck off it wasn't on purpose, dickshit"
beneehall 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@beneehall
'I don't believe this is real because in a real, scary situation'
That's why wimps like you aren't astronauts, or any other hero-type, that doesn't soil their drawers when things get tough.
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
Why would he die if he tears his suit??
TOSHOKU 1 year ago
@TOSHOKU
his oxygen would rapidly deplete and he would suffocate ... without saying his blood could boil because of the lack of pressure.
asusp3v4x 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TOSHOKU Why would he die if he tears his suit??
NAH..he was just on a hollywood set-nothing would have happened. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
This is so obvious how these astro-nots r being jerked up by wires-they don't even control their own hands while jumping.lol Nice hiding behind all the equipment too guys
makes t harder to see u with my dears.Phoney shit.
ed11561 1 year ago
What fucking bullshit-These assholes r only jumping about 2 feet into the air-not 4 feet
They should have been able to jump alot higher than that if they were really on the moon. Love the way they jump with all the equipment in the way blocking the view.
We never went to any moon. lol
ed11561 1 year ago
Only "Moon-Missions" made during the presidency of TRICKY DICK.Not b4-not since
How convenient.LOL
astro-nots at play in nevada.lol
ed11561 1 year ago
Why do people even deal with these hoax idiots? Just enjoy the video.
Unstung 2 years ago
Lol!
What is that jump at 0:18 ;)
The wires man, pulled a bit too soon?
Petroslip 2 years ago
@Petroslip LOL The wires definitely pulled him up too soon.Watch his hands-totally unprepared & off balance,
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
If that was the case, why didn't they do what Hollywood does in the event of a mistake during shooting, a retake. He is off balance because of the mass of the PLSS affecting his centre of gravity.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest oy u guys r more fucking deluded than a psychiatric patient on Haldol lol
We never went to the moon.
He is off balance because the wires weren't helping but bouncing them all over the place.lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
What is your experience with one sixth gravity that makes you such an expert? Or for that matter, with wire work?
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest I work for Cirque De Soleil like the astro-nots did. lol All wire work.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
Well, then, in your experience, why didn't they do a retake? Cirque De Soleil is in front of live audience, but any movie maker, if this really was fake, should have done a retake. So why didn't they?
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest Union coffee break, piss break, lunch break, Coffee truck pulled up outside the studio. Thought they could get away with it.
All bullshit. We never went to the moon. lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
"Union break"? Very funny. What do you do for Cirque De Solal?
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest Cirque de Soleil...... I rig wires for astro-nots so they can perform Moon Olympics. lol My next show is going to be called Moon-Nots.....watch for it.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 Whatever, you've just convinced me that you don't work for them. Except maybe cleaning up dropped popcorn and maltballs.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest Wow you're really quick.lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 I was merely giving you the benefit of the doubt. But since you are not an expert on wire work I find your claims irrelevant.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest Who cares? YOU are irrelevant.lol All of this is irrelevant.lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 Good bye, ed11561. I would say it has been fun discussing this with you, but it honestly hasn't.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest it's been fun making u think i work for the circus-lol Which just goes to show MOON-TARDS will believe ANYTHING- just like we went to the moon-LOL Biggest LIE & Hoax of all time. LOL
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 All that is saying to me is that you are neither an expert in wire work or one sixth g. In fact, you seem to be glorying in your ignorance.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest And you are a gullible,believe anything that anyone says which in itself,
is ignorance personified. LOL
we never ever went to the moon.-this is all braindead fakeshit.people in the 60's were gullible fools who still believed the government wouldn't lie to them-experiment ON them,feed them LSD,watch them die of syphilis,or spray them with germs.lol Boy were they wrong. lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@loperspest Einstein was not an expert in wire work OR 1/6 Gravity. Was HE ignorant? lol Your parameters are ridiculously dumb.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
What I meant, and I am pretty sure you know this, was that you are ignorant on one of the methods used to simulate flight or similar effects on film and stage, wire work. Since you are, and have admitted so, why should I trust your word when you say the astronauts were on wires?
As for evils the US government has done, the USSR weren't sunshine and roses either. They were worse in fact.
Should this be a reason to discard their commendable space achievements as 'fake' or 'hoax'?
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest Who the fuck is talking about Russian government? I couldn't give a fuck.
BTW we never went to the moon & that was the only way that the US could beat Russia space-wise. FAKE IT.100% Hoax. lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
Why was that the only way? What was stopping them, Van Allen Belt radiation?
Even the Russians knew it was safe.
"Seven day flights along the trajectories of the Zond-5 and 7 probes are safe from the radiation point of view."
cdsweb*cern*ch/record/864491/files/p484*pdf
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest Please stop the bullshit.The VAB wasn't safe then & it's not safe now.
We never went to the moon at all genius. BTW u will never ever convince me that anyone ever went to the moon.Just looking at the fucking LEM tells me that.Give up.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
It's not bullshit, it's Russian scientists own studies of the Van Allen belt.
As for the LM, Lunar Excursion Module was discarded as its title early on in the development process.
It doesn't need to be aerodynamic because it was never meant to re-enter an atmosphere. The gold foil covering is to reflect heat, the wrinkles keep contact with the subsurface to a minimum, minimizing conduction. Other spacecraft do the same thing.
gujaratiblogger*com/uploads/chandrayaan-05*jpg
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest the wrinkles keep contact with the subsurface to a minimum, minimizing conduction.= LOL U r like a fucking parrot for Nasa-the ones who faked all this apollo shit t beginwith. lol Polly want a cracker? lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
Did you even look at the photo of the Indian Space Research Organisation Chandrayaan lunar orbiter?
It has the same wrinkled foil exterior, for the exact same reasons. Aluminized Mylar has high reflectivity, and by minimizing the points it touches the interior, you minimize the amount of heat that leaks in of the minimum that is absorbed in the first place.
Just because you are ignorant of passive thermal control doesn't mean everyone is.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest LOL Yeah let me roll up some toilet paper after i wipe my ass and stick it to the LEM & tell you it's a refractive lens material cover that has a hyperbolic coating on it to prevent light reflection & refraction & to sensitive the meter for the reading of thermal waves while the lem is in orbit. LOL YOU'D FUCKING BELIEVE IT. LOL
ALL HORSESHIT DUMMY. all lies littleboy.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
What, you think they put the aluminized Mylar over the outer wall on because it looks pretty?
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest No they had to hide all the cardboard parts & impossibly fake connections.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
" impossibly fake connections" What impossibly fake connections are you referring to?
There is photos of the LM being manufactured. What were they building?
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest Fake hoax of the century.Blackmail the russians with Gagarin who was never in the russian rocket & tell them to shut up about apollo never going to the moon. The russians r happy & so r the dumb fuck americans.1969 People were really really dumb & the government had them so fucking brainwashed -they would believe anything. LOL
ed11561 1 year ago
If Gagarin wasn't in the rocket, why decades later reveal that the reentery didn't go as smoothly as once claimed, with the service module not detaching until the wires burned though, or that Gagarin ejected from his capsule before landing, contrary to older claims.
In your scenario if Gagarin didn't fly, these would also be lies. Why would the USSR do that?
As for what you say about the US government, so? I'm not saying that's not terrible, but I don't see what it has to do with Apollo.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest all bullshit by both sides.Funny how each "slash-down" was done in view of NO-ONE. LOL
we never went to the moon.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
It was early days yet for space flight, Errors occurred. Mercury-Atlas 7 was over 400 kilometres off course, no one saw that splash down either. Was Scott Carpenters flight a hoax? And you still haven't explained why if they were lying why they would invent decades later more damaging lies?
You also still haven't explained what you meant by 'impossibly fake connections'.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest I was talking about the fake cardboard looking sides of the LEM & all those fake rocket nozzles all around that fake bullshit Lunar Module.Come on- how the fuck did they even rendez-vous with the CM with no GPS- no real radar on the LEM no way of even hooking up-all BULLSHIT. What did they do say-READY,SET,GO
LOL we never went to any fucking moon genius
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
'cardbored looking' WHat makes you say that? The outer wall wasn't pressurized anyway.
. "fake rocket nozzles" Those 'fake' rocket nozzles were for orientation the lunar module on all axis. What makes you say they are fake?
"no real radar on the LEM"
Actually, they did have radar.
history*nasa*gov/alsj/ApolloLMRadarTND6849*pdf
NASA had much practise with orbital rendezvous with the Gemini program, which also had no way to 'look up'.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest LOL stop parroting nasa supposed facts.All bullshit lies.
Ready-set-blast off. geez i hope we meet up with the CM 1 of these years. LOL
we never ever went to any moon.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
Where are you getting your 'facts' that the LM didn't have rendezvous radar? And if you don't believe me that the outer wasn't pressurized, look at this photo of the LM ascent stage during construction.
hq*nasa*gov/office/pao/History/alsj/misc/apmisc-LM-noID-10*jpg
And if Vostok and Mercury programs were hoaxes, where did NASA get the experience to build the Space Shuttle and Soyuz? Are they hoaxes too, or are you just going to claim I am lying again?
It seems to be a reflex for you.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest tHE ASTRO-NOTS were never out of earths orbit EVER. lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
So now your down to the base assertion fallacy.
Unfortunately for you, others tracked the astronauts out of Earth orbit.
Some visually, following among other things, the clouds of vented urine.
astr*ua*edu/keel/space/apollo*html
Others were able to pick up their conversation on the moon.
svengrahn*pp*se/trackind/Apollo17/APOLLO17*htm
legacy*jefferson*kctcs*edu/observatory/apollo11/
So even if the USSR was covering for NASA, that still leaves many other non-NASA sources.
I got more.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest LOL All bullshit.Following clouds of vented urine?LOL U'd fall 4 ANYTHING. lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
The space shuttle does the exact same thing.
eclipsetours*com/sat/shuttle*html,
And what did you expect them to do? Store it? Would you like to be stuck in a capsule with your own waste products for the entire mission?
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest do u always totally miss the point? How old are you?
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 My age is irrelevant.
. Your 'point' seems to be to claim any evidence against your case you can't explain is bullshit or lies, despite not providing any evidence that is in fact the case.
Logically, this is known as the Bare Assertion Fallacy. I got the title wrong last time I mentioned it, saying 'base' instead of 'bare', but you still seem to be continuing with it.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest No kidding? Age is irrelevent- no shit sherlock.
Evidence? Just look at all the fims from Nasa with Astro-nots being pulled up by wires.
Watch greenmagoos-unforgiven1-and all the ohter people who post Nasa's lies that are obvious frauds.The "evidence" is everywhere.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
No, those are claimed to be wires, yet I have yet to see evidence that it is not simply the result of being in one sixth gravity. The 'pings'? They had antennas on their PLSS.
Neither wires nor slow down can explain the evidence of vacuum and lesser gravity seen in the following video. In a desperate attempt to explain it, one conspiracy theorist claimed they moved their arms 'really fast'. Yeah, and I bet that's how they did at the end of the Benny Hill show.
watch?v=01A61jra37o
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest The PINGS were well above the fake antennas they were 4 to 6 feet above the antennas, There are many films of them.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 Ever hear of lens flair?
photoanswers*co*uk/upload/2190/images/Lens%20flare*jpg
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest lens flair my ass-there r fucking wires in alot of the videos. Even on the fake blast off of the moon which is really ridiculous.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
Yes, and they are in similar lighting conditions in a lot of videos, using the same camera. Why should it be surprising there should be a lot of lens flare?
Why is the 'fake blast off' 'ridiculous'? You do know that the Apollo LM used a specific blend of hypergolic fuels whose exhaust in main sequence is transparent? The Delta 2 rocket uses the exact same fuel and oxidiser and you see the same thing.
watch?v=IvB-8CWw9eU
(watch from 7:10)
Wires can't do everything.
watch?v=IvB-8CWw9eU
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest The Lies are in your Visors
That so totally shows what a fake apollo was-it's ridiculous.
$2,000,000 Moon Globes with Track for cameras to film the fake Moon Ladings. LOL
Then destroyed after apollo's fakes are finished.Tricky Dick resigns-end of apollo hoaxes. LOL PS-U will never ever ever convince me of any moon landings so u might as well give up.We never went to the moon lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
They were used during flight training. A camera tried to controls in a simulator would 'fly' over the simulated terrain, in this case a lunar globe, playing on screens in the 'windows'.
Contemporary flight simulators did the same thing.
From a distance it does indeed look like the moon. But comparing close ups with close ups of the moon taken by Apollo shows the lack of detail in the model.
Also, Nixon resigned in Aug. 74, Apollo 17 flew in Dec. 72. I don't see the connection.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest watch?v=VSkgffxRRvk&feature=email
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 I only skimmed the first 30 seconds and it's ludicrous. Have you ever been to night practise in a sports field? All those different light sources in separate locations mean multiple shadows criss crossing each other at angles. This not seen in Apollo photos.
It should be quite obvious what it is, lens flare.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest LOL whatever u say.lol The ole lens flare bullshit.lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
If it was multiple lights, how come there isn't multiple shadows? And if they were lights, how come no one on the alleged hoax production team noticed? Airbrushing lights out of black sky would probably be the easiest thing in the world, you could probably do it in MS-Paint.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest NASA/DISNEY MOON MAGIC.LOL
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561
Lovely, but that answers neither of my questions.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest actually download any NASA photo and play around with the contrast and shit and interesting square boxes and blocks start showing up in the black space sky. almost like they were to cheap to work it out the hard way in the development bath so they did it on the actual photograph. i have done this for myself after some one showed me how on you tube.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast Look up how jpeg compression works, which is how the high resolution NASA photos are stored on line. It has this effect.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest naw i dont need to, i could have invented jpeg compression, so i understand it. it simple. and your right to a certain extent. i would never claim we didnt visit the moon based on photo evidence because it really is an object image and not a virtual image.
datzfast 1 year ago
@cadu1995 Well, as you admitted yourself, you will never be convinced we landed on the moon. Spoken by a true believer, no amount of evidence will ever persuade you otherwise. You need to honestly take a step back and look at the statement you just made. When it comes to the point where you will ignore all evidence that doesn't support your position, you are truly lost.
ajhick2 1 year ago
@ajhick2 watch?v=VSkgffxRRvk&feature=email
ed11561 1 year ago
@ajhick2 The EVIDENCE i've seen is bullshit.When i see real film footage of a conceivable moon landing THEN i'll believe but they were already caught faking shit.
Outright forgery in the CMsupposedly going to the moon.Funny how Kaguya & LRO
PROVED NOTHING. LOL
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 So, when you see something you don't believe is convincing evidence you just say you don't like it and that's it? No science? No concrete rebuttal? It just doesn't look real to you? Wow, brilliant. You make it an easy job for those of us who believe and can demonstrate the historicity of Apollo.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@ed11561 they did too, they proved with a one meter ground resolution you can see boot trials when the boots are just 6 inches wide. of course you cant do that on earth photographs but this is the moon god damn it and its a special place.
datzfast 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@datzfast they did too, they proved with a one meter ground resolution you can see boot trials when the boots are just 6 inches wide. of course you cant do that on earth photographs but this is the moon god damn it and its a special place.
LOL TOTAL BULLSHIT. Wake the fuck up moron-we never ever ever went to any moon.They would have been fried like calamari dummy. lol Nevermind-go back to sleep.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@loperspest The recent Falcon-9 launch was unusual in having an upper stage burn kerosene/LOX. Most upper stages burn LH2/LOX or hypergols, known to have plumes that are nearly invisible even in air. But guess what - Falcon showed that, in a vacuum, even kerosene/LOX rockets have invisible plumes!
It's classic. When an Apollo denier sees something that defies his intuition, it must be faked; his intuition could never be wrong!
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ed11561 Ever hear of lens flair?
photoanswers*co*uk/upload/2190/images/Lens%20flare*jpg
Also, if they are on wires, how are they waling around each other? How come they aren't getting tangled?
watch?v=8wOjDiMFjoA&
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest No one saw ANY of the splash downs. LOL
What damaging lies r u talking about now?
ed11561 1 year ago
@loperspest 1969 The US shot Plutonium in the arms of people-gave them LSD-Watched as they died of syphillis & didn't give them the cure.Spread germs & virus' in the NYC subway system-sprayed chemicals in NYC thru cars exhaust pipes.Told us saccahrine & tobaco were good for us.Sprayed DDTon school kids in playgrounds.
I LOVE THIS COUNTRY. LOL not
ed11561 1 year ago
Where are the stars??
How did the astronots get from the command module to the lunar module??
Where is the Tv transmission equipment??
hypobusa 2 years ago
Where is your Google..?
Rob260259 2 years ago
@Rob260259 LOL GOOGLE SHOWS NOTHING ASSWIPE. LOL
ed11561 1 year ago
@hypobusa
OMGWTFBBQ "where are the stars?" that question has been answered so many times over the past 40 years you must be fuckass retarded
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
@ JoMoHomo
That's not very nice...
What about the other questions.. Arsewipe....
hypobusa 2 years ago
@hypobusa
OK you ask and I'll tell you.
What other questions?
There are no moon hoax claims that can't be debunked with a few facts.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"There are no moon hoax claims that can't be debunked with a few facts."
Oh? What about "NASA used mind control devices to make everyone believe it!" xD
See if you wore the tin-foil hat like the rest of us, your eyes would be open to The Truth (tm).
Boy75402 2 years ago
@hypobusa Kinda funny how they decided to do their moon olympics totally blocked from view by all the equipment.LIARS & FRAUDS.
ed11561 1 year ago
Thank Jesus for this video. Now I can debunk all the moontards.
Right, like that'll work. Pearls before swine.
wiredforstereo 2 years ago
total bs. there is something fishy. if it was 1/6th gravity when astronauts fell they should easily be able to pick up them selves with 1 hand. im talking about the first appllo mission. and now they can jump 4 feet.
TeamDarkMatter 2 years ago
TeamDarkMatter, no matter where they are, getting up wearing a bulky, stiff, pressurized suit is not going to be easy. It's like wearing your own space ship!
LunarTuner 2 years ago
Now that's what I call the good ol days.
When are we goin back? Oh yeah, we'd rather squander our wealth fighting other humans....still
ThePipersNicks 2 years ago
Why is it only Science Dumbasses on YT that can find all the fakery?
Why can't smart people see all this obvious fakery????? HAAAAAAAAAAA
You Hoax FuckTards are just so frigging stupid.
LindaStevensBZ 2 years ago
wheres mythbusters?
stargazn00 2 years ago
i love how the first appllo missing he could jump only 4 inches now their able to jump 4 feet
stargazn00 2 years ago
No shit i love how no one even wants to talk about this video..
trexx32 2 years ago
stargazn00, first of all, the "first apollo mission" was an unmanned test of a Saturn 1b rocket. Second, the goal of the first spacewalk was not to see how high one can jump. Just because one can jump 4 feet doesn't mean one always will or always should!
LunarTuner 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
These videos are ridiculous.
ChosenOne67 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
greenmagoos is right- at 0.19 the astronaut 'pings' up in the air without moving his arms or legs. He just shoots up into the air. Watch and see it for yourself.
Theres millions of real events televised in the world and people dont pick holes in them, theres a good reason why people pick holes in the lunar missions , it's because their are so many flaws in them. Watch "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" for more info.
you2begin 2 years ago
"Watch "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" for more info. "
One thing you will not get from "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon" is "info". A good laugh, possibly. A demonstration of extreme stupidity, certainly. A perfect illustration of why people with no scientific understanding whatsoever should not attempt to comment on scientific matters, absolutely. But "info"? No.
fifiragdoll 2 years ago 9
Brilliantly said
R1cku1n0x 2 years ago
Did it ever occur to you that his arms and legs don't move that much because he's in a big bulky spacesuit that is restricting his motion? Moontard logic is amusing.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
Astronauts fall over all the time in films and they don't show any concern, the don't check their backpacks either.
The Astronaut on the left clearly looks under the influence of a wire when he falls.
.
Why are photos and films so limited in the landscape they show, why didn't one of the astronauts get to a high point and show a large area of land, theres aways hills in the near horizon, where are the photos or film of craters at ground level?
you2begin 2 years ago
They don't usually fall on their backpacks from four feet in the air.
Watch the other footage of astronauts falling over on the moon (e.g. Dave Scott tripping over a rock in the Apollo 15 footage). They twist their bodies as they fall, to avoid landing on their backpacks, and the moon's gravity usually allows them time to do it. Here, Charlie Duke overbalances and can't right himself, and lands pretty heavily on his back. He was right to be scared.
fifiragdoll 2 years ago 3
"there's always hills in the near horizon"...
Not necessarily the near horizon. Those hills could be mountains three hundred miles away for all you know - the moon's empty landscape makes it impossible to judge distance.
They couldn't land the lunar module on the side of a hill because it might overbalance, and they couldn't use the rover to climb up the side of mountains. But Apollo 15 landed in Hadley Rille, and Apollo 16 landed in the lunar highlands. Try looking into these missions...
fifiragdoll 2 years ago
Duke would have to have had wires on his feet also to give the illusion that he overbalanced due to being top-heavy.
davewatcher 2 years ago 5
whos holding the camera or controlling it? Where is it placed?
gullungen84 2 years ago
Camera is attached to the Lunar Rover Vehicle and controlled from Ground Control in Houston.
amontaiyagala 2 years ago 2
"even loaded with a back pack totaling 380 pounds an "astronaut" should be able to jump at least 6 feet, too complicated for nasa wires team"
I always love people making comments like that on the Lunar Olympics jumps.
Oh yeah, because there wasn't OBVIOUSLY a danger in doing so. Certainly not a danger that is the ENTIRE POINT of this video! :P
ImTheSecretSquare 2 years ago 4
Great scene from the Moon, so real, so human.
Of course, lunatic conspiracy theorists, as always, will do their best to use it to support their empty theory. Once they claim astronauts never jumped high enough, then when they actually see they did, CTs say it's fake.
There is no evidence here or in any other scene in Apollo footage that any wire supports were used.
All moving objects, including tools, pieces of foil dropped or thrown, and dust, behave consistently with Moon's environment.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Check Young's second set of jumps at the start.
He doesn't bend his knees at all, just gets yanked up in the air at the start.
Yet more evidence of wire supports.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
Or maybe evidence of one sixth gravity.
loperspest 2 years ago 5
lucky his suit didn't break :)
hejjagheterdaniel 3 years ago
even loaded with a back pack totaling 380 pounds an "astronaut" should be able to jump at least 6 feet, too complicated for nasa wires team
vladika07 3 years ago
The moon's gravity is about 1/6 that of earth. Someone wearing a 380 pound backpack can't jump a foot on earth, so why shold they be able to jump 6 feet on the moon?
cellohero314 3 years ago
Shaq can jump higher than that at 6x the gravity. Fuck Nasa they cant even see the stars when on the moon.Wires, mirrors and smoke fuck them
vladika07 3 years ago
Show me a photo taken from Earth orbit with an exposure time equal to Apollo with stars in it. Possibly, but Shaq is also at least a foot taller, trained most of his life to jump, and not wearing a spacesuit with equal his dry weight and mass on his back.
loperspest 3 years ago 2
Well, I guess the guy manning the alleged studio wires was sleeping on the job.
Serious, Charlie Duke is one of my favorite astronauts. He's a good ol' boy with a very down to earth, sensible way of describing things. This was awesome.
LunarTuner 3 years ago 3
What makes the Moon Hoax Believers tick? First and foremost...they want to sound smart. They want to feel important. They want to be respected. All day they carefully monitor their favorite YT Hoax clips, and when they see one of their supporters chiming in, their heart skips a beat with joy. They absolutely beam with pride thinking they are taking on the Evil NASA Establishment and winning!!!! LOL!!! TOO funny. What a bunch of losers.
LindaStevensBZ 3 years ago
Linda-
The evidence of a hoax is so clear that, once people have seen it, there's nothing you shills can do to make them think the moon missions were real.
I posted a partial summary of the hoax evidence here.
3W's (dot) rushlimbaughforum (dot) com/never-went-the-moon-t2782 (dot) html
(check link for gaps)
The only thing the government can do to sway public opinion is try to keep people from seeing the evidence.
Cosmored 3 years ago
And thank goodness you've blown it all open! I can't wait for the parades in your honor to start!
carzorthade 2 years ago
Hoax Believers are perfect examples of Scientific Illiterates who think they'll be big heroes by finding the NASA "smoking gun". In reality...most Hoax Believers are simply frustrated by their own insignificance and failures. Sadly...because Mommy always told them how smart they were, they can't transition to the real world. In the adult realm, the typical Hoaxer is unable to function. Only on the internet, can a Hoaxer feel a little success. Said it before...Hoax Believers are simply losers.
LindaStevensBZ 3 years ago
it just goes to show, they cant afford to fool around when walking on the moon too much cos there is always that fear of the suit tearing open
punji73 3 years ago
How do you reckon Young made that jump from a near stop at 0.19 when he makes no effort to bend his knees?
greenmagoos 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hmmm...Wires come to mind! Then, when you watch this in light of panner excuses that the astronots couldn't jump very high because of their backpacks. Well, they come out as double-talking, back-peddling, bullshit artists that they are!
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago
"Wires come to mind" Good idea. Electroconvulsive Therapy might work on you, un4g1v3n1. Although it works best on manic depressives, apparently there has been some success in treating those such as you who have psychotic delusions and paranoia. Give it a try, un4g1v3n1. It certainly couldn't make you any worse.
HealthySkeptic 3 years ago
Is that how they were able to treat you? Hmm...it didn't work...You still believe in Santa Clause...How is it working in his shop with the other elves?
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago
Sorry. Don't believe in Santa. I believe the dust particles that appear when I use flash photography are fifth dimensional beings or creatures of the multiverse No, wait... I don't believe that; YOU do. My bad.
HealthySkeptic 3 years ago
You don't have a clue what I believe in that respect. I've only provided a video for consideration. If you wish to write every one of every persons photos and videos off to dust, that would just be more of your fear, and lack of proper investigation showing your ugly, scared, little boy self. It's people like you that scoffed at the idea of germs and atoms years and years ago. Keep scoffing. It's the unhealthy skeptics best friend.
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago
Thanks for providing that video for consideration ...and for posting the reply from a trained photographer who clearly explains the cause which you summarily dismiss. Their reply: "the truth is, you seem to be the close-minded one - refusing to believe any simple, factual explanations." They certainly pegged you on that one. Thanks, but I'll keep scoffing if you don't mind.
HealthySkeptic 3 years ago
Why don't you try and defend these antics by the Apollonots...This anot is such a liar. Fear. How can he fear when he is obviously on a moon set, and not the moon at all. Apollogists said over and over again the reason the anots never reached any great heights was because of the bulk and weight of their packs. Once this video was revealed, they flip flopped faster than politicians on ice! You want to flip flop with them. Scoffing is all you have!
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago
amontaiyagala is a true patriot, shining the light on these Apollonot fakers!
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago