The First Moon Landing in 1969

[poisonplumbs]

its funny that people actually believe this stuff,i hope im around for the real moon landing.

[TheJomogogo]

@poisonplumbs

you'd just say it was fake

[parkisooon]

fuck u

[Sam67SG]

Second light source? Where is the second shadow?

[KaOssis]

The vid from 0:26 - 0:38 and again from 0:45 - 1:44 is a superimposed shot of two films, the shuttle is just a miniture model and the astronauts superimposed over the top of the miniture model film, that's why the astronaut appearse ghostlike and the background image from the miniture model film are seen clearly through the astronaut, a problem with bleaching ektachrome film too much and putting two seperate films together, and yet more proof that Nazi NASA faked Apollo 11!

[LunarTuner]

@KaOssis No, the ghost-like appearance is because this was a rarely-used video standard using only 10 frames per second, combined with a Vidicon tube. The result was "burn in" where still objects remain in the CRT phosphors while moving objects "like astronauts" are not "transparent." It's a common issue of the video technology of that day. There is no "film" involved here.  This was live video!

[KaOssis]

Bullshite LunarTuner, this scene from Apollo 11 was two scenes filmed with Kodack Ektachrome, a well known trick of running two filmed scenes through a projector onto a screen used in the movie industry for decades, especially in horror movies. One scene was a model of Apollo 11, the 2nd scene was the astronauts running about a studio. Your refering to the news video that recorded from the projection screen. I watched the news record this scene from a porjector screne LIVE, where was you???

[LunarTuner]

@KaOssis, you watched the "news" record this when you were 8? Why were you with "the news" when you were 8?

That's a fun "theory" but you have not one shred of tangible evidence showing this Kodak Ektachrome process you refer to. On the other hand, I can show you photos of the camera used by Apollo 11, how and where it was stowed, how it was deployed, how the image was sent to earth and I can give testimony from those involved. Can you do anything of the kind?

[KaOssis]

Hahahaa, yep, I was watching the global news reporters all setting up their equipment and they all recorded NASA's Ektachrom movie which was filmed months earlier and shown on a projector screen LunarTuner. You can go on about all the techie stuff you like, I was there, you wan't, and I witnessed a lot more than just that public display of NASA's A11 moon fakery than you think, even thought I was a child at the time, I don't need evidence to remember the truth, and you can't destroy that!

[LunarTuner]

@KaOssis, you were hanging out with the press corp when you were 8? Seriously? Please tell that story....

...or maybe you can't. Since all you have is memory and no actual evidence, your "conjecture" is worthy of being thrown out of the court of rational judgement. Come back when you have an actual case, Einstein.

[KaOssis]

Hahaha, no, I was in the same conference room that the press were recording from their cameras the NASA faked A 11 moon scam LunarTuner, cause thats the recordings your using your techie crap about, the news reporters footage, nt the ektachrome footage that NASA had already filemed months earlier, adn it was only the live radio broadcast that was actually live that day, and scripted to fit the earlier filmed moon mission. Lovely place Mexico, but pretty hot in those space suits, tee hee!

[LunarTuner]

@KaOssis Mexico? You hoaxheads can't decide it it's Mexico, New Mexico, California, Nevada, Texas, Antarctica or Langly, VA. And your story is cute, but as I said, it's nothing but an imaginative story with not a bit of credibility. Quaint, but you can't back it up. Sad.

[KaOssis]

You need to study a dictionary LunarTuner, cause a Hoaxer is one that fakes an event, I havn't faked any event, I've witnessed an event being Hoaxed, so go back to school, cause you sound like you need educating a lot more than just the 20% of one half of your brain active, and only Nazi's use reverse psychology, so remember that before you use it again!

[LunarTuner]

@KaOssis Uh, I don't believe I called you a "hoaxer."

...and you still don't appear interested in offering any evidence to your theory.

[KaOssis]

You only had to read a couple of posts back to see that you DID accuse me of being a Hoaxer LunarTuner, and herre's your own words that make you look like you have qalzheimers brain degrade!

"You hoaxheads can't decide it it's Mexico, New Mexico,... ".

And I don't have to offer any evidence to you whatsoever, clearly my memory work's a lot better than yours does!!!

[LunarTuner]

@KaOssis "Hoaxhead" ≠ "Hoaxer"!

Do those two words look the same to you?

Enjoy your memories. The rest of us will enjoy data, facts and objective reality.

[KaOssis]

Your still calling me a hoxer LunarTuner, which is Nazi Psychotic Schitzophrenia and Munchausen by Proxy reverse psychology, cause I havn't faked any event to dupe the public with, you havn't got an ounce of evidence with which to substantiate your allegations that I've hoxed anthing, but NASA has many times and you know it, cause you wouldn't be using Nazi reverse psychology calling me the hoaxer otherwise and I don't give a flying pigs arse what you say, I'm still laughing at you, hahaha!

[LunarTuner]

@KaOssis Whatever, Hoaxhead.

[Synthetrix]

@LunarTuner I prefer the term "hoaxturd" for the morons who think the Apollo moon landings were faked.

[realdrummer110]

@Synthetrix  I prefer real music to the dogshit you produce....hahahahaha and so do 98.9% of all peoples of planet earth.. hahahahahaha

[TheJomogogo]

@Synthetrix

Yes, hoaxturd is good, how about Lunartics?

[MrDoverben22]

For good-ness sake this vid was done in 1969 give these dudes a break, it looks fishy by todays standards?

[bevoorbeeld]

It's fake.

[nosajj12345]

If the missions truly were faked don't you guys think NASA would of performed one serious editing job on the films before releasing them. With the reputation of our country at stake, don't you hoaxers think they would have taken the time to edit out things like errant shadows, fake suns, wires and all the other things you claim are visible on the films. Hahaha...why would they leave all those mistakes for you boneheads to find. They don't call them rocket scientists for nothing

[TarotLadyLissa]

He seems kind of transparent.

[krisdevalle]

It's just poor image quality. First time they took a video camera into space and all, and it had to be really light. So what you're getting is a slow update, with some of the background still showing as the astronaut moves in the foreground.

[nosajj12345]

@nasafakedit Not as fake as you

[nasafakedit]

@nosajj12345  the propaganda retarded pimp

[axis187]

LOL Bullshit the flag is not supposed to fly in space bands idiots there is no air but nobody thinks...

[123Thisizit]

Race for dominance ,this is crazy Hollywood crape let's see some new tech pictures so we can see it was a fake landing . It is as fake as a cure for cancer .Lets just send Cancer patients their and see them get cooked with radiant ion for the cure .

[123Thisizit]

Looking for the hoax fakery ? Take the shot of the space walk and watch how the lighting changes position , stage lighting is very evident if you look for it.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

"look for it"

Everytime I'm asked to do that, I never see anything. Neither does anyone else.

The "hoax" is built entire on the wishful thinking of predictable newbs who want to find something so bad, they see whatever they want to.

[123Thisizit]

You also probably believe that burning kerosene can melt steel .

[SpreadingtheMuse]

You're probably dumb enough to believe any conspiracy you hear. ;)

Out of all of the usual nonsense

911

Princess Di

Pearl Harbor

JFK

etc etc etc, cant you name one thats SO stupid that even YOU dont believe it?

[TheJomogogo]

Oh....shit........there's no stars it must be fake LOLOLOL

[wsee]

project paper clip 1947 details of nasa's NAZI origins... "germany lost the war, the NAZI'S just moved" mark phillips, ex CIA. THEY WILL FAKE ANYTHING & EVERYTHING including an 'ALIEN INVASION"... get your popcorn, pathetic brainwashed man on the moon believers.... the 'show' will be a DOOZIE, & you will even see it in the sky, not just on your mandatory upgraded to HIGH DEF idiot boxes... so it will have to be true, right??? nasa are the "HoAXturds"!!!!

[Spherian7]

love how that magic sceptor next to the flag materializes and dematerializes. Neat trick !

[GSpotter63]

Its called a secondary light reflection you &$#)*^ moron, get an education.

[nasafakedit]

@GSpotter63 its a 2nd light source you moron

even Jan Lunberg from hasselblad admited that

[Synthetrix]

I highly recommend the Science Channel's series, "Moon Machines", especially for today's skeptical youth who were not around when it happened. They go into great technical detail on the various systems and how they were designed, built and operated. It's really fascinating and will answer many of the ridiculous suppositions put forth by the hoaxtards on YouTube. Stay in school kids, you don't want to end up like these pathetic ass hats. A quick look at their profiles usually reveals the madness

[pintend]

I have watched that series,and it blew my mind away to how these incredible machines are made,I recommend everyone to watch that documentary.

[Atheistjeremy]

I second that. Please get an education. Listen in school.

[maruca88]

Thats one small step for man; one giant leap for mankind. Great words!! 40 years of a great day for the humanity!

[RickE323]

humanmonkeys1 shut the hell up- youi have no idea what the hell you are talking about. It did happen. Sorry to burst you bubble it happened and then we laned there another five times after this.

[MrNochanceever]

HUman monkey is just a retard who says the moon landing was a hoax over and over but never gives a fact. He's a dimwit.

[eblanaken]

A sound stage somewhere in Texas.

[BamBoemBam]

They never went there in 1969. NASA needed funding and to win the moon war with russia, so they faked it.

Period.

[TheJomogogo]

Yes Bambam I agree because if they drove through the Van Halen Belt thing, they'd have gotten supar powers like the Fantastic Four but none of the astronauts even got Xray vision so it must be fake.  Wanna help me build a fort in my backyard tomorrow? We can look at the moon through cardboard tubes an prove more stuff about how it was phony.

[CaptainCrunchOwns]

"but none of the astronauts even got X-ray vision so it must be fake"

Oh gosh, Jomo, that was awesome. Truly awesome...thank you for the laugh.

[ZombiesNTea]

Basic conjecture is bullshit. Do you have evidence?

[joebran8]

if this is real, then why is there a giant light beaming down the middle?

[capetown99]

Is that the sun?

[CaptainCrunchOwns]

I dunno, I think it was probably due to this star in the center of our solar system commonly referred to as "the sun". That's my guess, but good point joebran8.

[Umbrella0021]

your wrong but if thats so true, is a moonlanding not a stunt than?, its not usefull at all,

[dthibds]

THE FLAG IS NOT MOVING AT ALL WTF R CONSIPRACY THEORISTS ON ABOUT!!!, why do they question human technology the only thing i question is why hasent much changed in 40eyars :(

[nicmcn744]

i know well the flag moves when it takes back off

[auggiebendoggy]

No air = no float = no clouds?

I think the point he's making is shouldnt the dirt fly alot further than it is. When launched by being kicked, should it not travel quite a distance?

[SpreadingtheMuse]

"I think the point he's making is shouldnt the dirt fly alot further than it is. When launched by being kicked, should it not travel quite a distance?"

Well should it or shouldnt it? He shouldnt have to guess, because without friction or air resistance, thats a black-letter physics equation any yutz could calculate.

So its simple, what IS that physics equation, and if this screwball really did do the calculation on how far the dust should have gone, MAY I SEE these calculations?

[auggiebendoggy]

LOL,

if they wanted to show the world they should have jumped off and not climbed the ladder!

[azminivanracer]

not sure i follow...

[tatsrocks11]

100% Fake.

How come, no one ever goes on the moon now. Only once and they like never went again.

ITS CAUSE U CANT GO ON THE MOON/ as i was saying 100% fakeee

[azminivanracer]

nobody goes to the moon anymore because missions like that are HUGELY expensive. the Apollo missions collectively cost somewhere around 50 Billion dollars. then the shuttle program began. the shuttle was never designed for moon landings and it's the only vehicle for manned spaceflight that we have used since Apollo.

Apollo simply cost too much. also at the time, people had lost interest in moon landings by the Apollo 17 mission. and, where there is a lack of interest, there is a lack of funds.

[WTFclips]

they went to the moon 7 times not just 1s and there ara plans to go back in 2011

[eblanaken]

Why? Because there is so much interesting shit there? How much moon dust does it take to figure out that it is just the Moon? A barren rock, probably not unlike anything you kick around in your backyard.Go fix the healthcare system.

[Umbrella0021]

USA is a country of falsehood, with help of German/Dutch rocket scientists Russia sets almost every space record, because USA couldnt admit defeat to the mighty Russian bear it faked a moonlanding wich was so called the hardest target so most points, nonsence Russia wins and Europe rules

[azminivanracer]

the soviets had alot of "first's" in their space program, but the achievements by the Soviets are not as impressive as some would imply. that a number of these 'firsts' were mere stunts that did not advance the technology significantly, or at all (e.g. the first woman in space) Most of the firsts by the Russians were done by the US within a year afterward (sometimes within weeks). In 1965 the US started to achieve many firsts which were important steps in a mission to the Moon.

[Eschatus2]

Was this filmed in the desert? Why are there frogs jumping around on the ground? 1st at 0:57 at right mid-foreground from left to right in front of flag pole; and 2nd at 1:42 at center extreme foreground from left to right.

[ChanVideos]

Its a reflection you dumb ass

[Eschatus2]

AUTO BLOCK: YouTube recipient does not recognize your routing number.

[charliep1963]

So who took the vid of the first man to stand on the moon?? And as the gravitational pull is less and they said it was like charcoal dust but white, why aren't there clouds of it as they run around. It would also take longer than 20 mins for it to settle after landing. Where are the stars? They apparently should always be seen from the moon.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

There was a camera in the leg of the lander, put there specifically to record the ladder, as someone thought it might be a good idea to record the first man on the moon. ;)

Dust "billows" because its floating on air.

Moon has no air.

No air = no float = no clouds

No stars because they are too dim compared to the exposure time on the camera. Take your own camera outside and try to take a pic of a star, you'll get nothing. Try it anytime.

[Salt231]

You can't see the sky or stars from this camera angle. Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon, he was the one filming the other guy getting out.

[JerusalemHolyLand]

Nasa and USA is not gone to moon!!

All is big lie!!

All video is fake!! USA lie to all world!!

[user17v]

Not one thing that appears on the surface of the Moon had to be placed by Man. Be it mirrors to reflect lasers from here on Earth to calculate distances or seismology equipment. All could have been placed there by robotic machines. It wouldn't necessarily need a human to place them there. Or sent during earlier probe missions...

[kurziieee]

i think its intersting to see humans not droids operate in space. our metabolism is very complicated so if we ever want to colonize other planets we should start get used to space as much as possible :>

[user17v]

Fool me Once ... Shame On You.

Fool me Twice ... Shame on Me.

Fool me SIX TIMES ... we are a bunch of idiots.

[RCBSilat]

When people where on the moon they put mirrors there and now nearly every day we fire lasers at them to calculate the distance from the Earth to the moon. Also to hoax this would involve so many people it would be practically impossible to stop some leaking the information out and they would have scruitinised it for months to make sure there where no mistakes.

[3254man]

You are right. completely impossible to hoax.

[Scousegod81]

$40 Billion dollars was raised for this "mission" it is easy to pay off enough people to cover it up.

No one has been back to the moon since this day (even though technology is much more advanced) and Bill Clinton was told it would take 11 years before they were ready to put a man on the moon.

Its fake, it didnt happen!

[rounddeworld]

Regardless as to how much technology has advanced, the number of retards posting on youtube has only increased.

Thanks for your glorious post proving that we've never made it to the moon.

Fucking idiot.

[CodyLawrenceTV]

People need to understand, none of these scientists who make up these theories have been on the moon, how in the hell would they know what goes on?

[adamrawksyourworld]

Youtube comments make me want to shoot myself!

[AbbyStern413]

so fake because u can see threw him

[jamesgambino]

reason u cud see thru them is bc of the moons lack of ionization. It is a hypothesis on why we see ghosts. We are seeing in ultra violet like an xray machine. Good observation but incorrect about being fake. It wud be fake if u cant see thru them. U disproved your own point

[CamelDrifter]

It's fake and I fucking know it.

[Legendary12345]

anyone who says this is fake is fucking retarded just like the faggots who say the hollocaust wasnt real. If were doing space missions PAST the moon dont u think we would have landed on it 1st dumbasses we have the technology to go to the moon for fuck sake

[aurora2k]

I said is fake what the fuck are u gonna do about it ?

robotics is one thing landing humans and bring them back is another. The technology at the time wasn't sophisticated enough to land a man on the moon.

[AmgCJoop]

Well, one thing u didnt notice was the flag, waving through the air, in space theres no fucking wind u moron! SO GIVE US A GOOD REASON WHY TIS AINT FAKE.

[Legendary12345]

too bad it isnt moving and when it is its him putting the flag down into the surface and faggot it looks like its moving but thats the shadow moron

[gaaraxzs]

If it were the showdow, where did the shadow come from? if you think it were the stars then how come you can't see them?

[Legendary12345]

gaar its the shadow from the sun dumbass. if it was on the opposite side where it was pitch black cause the sun wasnt hitting it u wouldnt be able to see shit BUT since they landed on the light side u were able to see a shadow from the space ship. plus u retards say its fake but look where we are at now with technology were able to go past the moon maybe u should read up on some of the shit and stop looking like retards

[jamesgambino]

shadows are caused from the lights on the transport and stars. do ur research on this and let me know

[sinjohnt]

they did a test on mythbusters and it prooves that it only moves when someone it touching it because the flags rod is up and accross the top and thers your reason

[charlieelcharlie]

SO FAKE! And gravitational force in the moon is six times less, so when he walks he should jump a lot higher if it were real. And what is amazing is that history books stil put Neil Amstrong as the first man to walk in the moon in 1969, this is such a lie.

[glymusic]

Did you realize that if that was on earth he would not be able to jump at all because that suit is heavy... I hate to think how people these days became more stupid since we've become more skeptical.

[accountfnax]

LOL! You no nothing about gravity at all! Besides, the suit is not very flexible meaning he can't just jump super high! If you was walking in moon gravity, i think you would be pretty wacky too when you walk! huh?

[Harlew]

Was it local moon tv station cameras that took the first video images.Where are the footprints leading back from camera position?

[SCcritic]

You can see that flag moving like there is no tomrrow!

[odell007]

After we get our troops home from this meaningless war, We need something to this caliber to put our country back on track.

[ronnieknotts]

Despite this amateurish garbage...

I do hope we get to the moon one day.

It will take a lot of money though!

I wonder who the first person will be!

[tatoo56]

one brave man

[Huckf113]

Hey, is that a spot light, to the right of our screens. There is a flashing dot in the black background!

[camz21]

this whole video, is a shit! how come the flag move a bit, there's no air outside the earth, how come he can hop at the moon, coz if u hop, you'll b floating forever at the universe, thats why this whole video is just one of a lie in the lives of mankind

[InuTheDawg]

Because the moon has gravity like the earth does?

[Rilaayy]

the flag isnt waving...it only moved when they were shaking it. otherwise it was straight the whole time...

and the moon does have a gravitational pull....just not as strong as earth's..

[TroutButter]

Uh dude, if it has mass, it has a gravitational force. Even your shoe, of course it's very small. Learn some physics.

[SpaceShipBuilder]

we landed on the moon. now get over it

[Lauren123a]

hahaha

[directorwvp2]

i want to go to the moon too

[kavina656]

LOL.... LOOK HOW HE WAS RUNNING! Space Is So Hilarious! xD he Looked SOOOO Funny... I Guess Its Awesome How Gravity Works xD

[aajoeyjo]

That is awesome! Thanks for posting it. Now just imagine how bright and clear the moon would look if we would just go there now, with iTechnology...lol

[kenzylee]

no,it is camera on the space ship...

[vvfking]

there was someone filming him while he stepped outside the spaceship...

[vvfking]

and if neil armstrong were the first man on the moon. who was the one filming him?

[vvfking]

they did not land on the moon, since their is no gravity on the moon they wouldnt leave foot marks... and there is no wind on the moon so why is the flag moving?

[Rospippimippiness]

there is some grevaity, just not much

completely agree with you on the flag thing

[NicNasty1981]

flag might be moving slightly because of solar wind

[thebronx666]

i dont by this

[Aviator178]

this goes to snuguyenn, we believe it because we study it, you are a fucking cokehead asshole.

[lilmovieboi]

it was a setup

[raghavpradeep]

he he.. guys be a sport..

[fairynk9]

There is no starch on the flag. It is stiff because there is no wind and very little gravity on the moon.

[synermartin]

They must have put a lot of starch on that flag, it's pretty stiff.

[wesstrite]

it's also stiff because the flag pole is an upside down L. there's a pole across the top to hold it up. Nothing complicated.

[metehan58]

fake..

[ChrissyoSpace]

Nope.

[joenufc111]

My god, we all love a good conspiracy don't we. Make your dull lives a bit better does it. Some of the comments here are so stupid, we did land on the moon. Get over it.

[snguyenn]

EVERYONE KNOWS ITS FAKE. if you think its real your a fuckign noob. only thing real is the MARS ROVER, USA only made the man on the moon to scare the NATZIS during the cold war, to show and pretend they had better technology during the time. its always a war between who had the best gadgets etc --dennis

[ChrissyoSpace]

The Moon Landings were real. Get over it. :)

[mofuman]

"Natzis during the cold war?"

wtf pls go to school and study some history dumbass

[StraitSomali613]

Natzis in the cold war? LOL go read up on ur history man

[bliggsy1163]

typical inteligence level of your typical appolo hoax beliver! natzis FFS!

[tatoo56]

get a life dude

i think its real so u think im a fucking fag come say it to my face in spokane washington ill beat ure ass

[brazza1016]

its fake

[WaterTheBest100]

look there is no stars who engine at the button of the egale and selitwats where there not suppose to be

this is waayyy fake

[arpee92]

If that was the first moon landing , who recorded him landing on the moon!?

[icysakuke]

it saterlite u dumass!!!!

[zlayzer]

Someone probbly has but this is fake since they get the message from neil and the other guy directly and they are like 1 million kilometers away from each other! And how the hell did they film from the outside when he hasnt been outside yet since i don't think that they had wireless cameras in 1969!

[gaaraxzs]

thats fake no man has ever been on the moon!

[Avigoorn]

They where. Only because of things they found and saw on the moon (original footage) they couldn't use that film. They made some studio recordings instead. This film is indeed fake.