"Pseudo" Child Pornography??? o_O [Re-Uploaded]

[sWeepingsAnd]

Anyone know why herglassbones left?

[Ujames1978Forever]

Dear sWeepingsAnd,

I'm afraid that I don't :-(

[Adnaana]

I loved the last comments, they were wonderful. Please keep up such sharp wit.

[Moontanman]

I have to agree, not child pr0n, crazy to think so...

[TheAssesKicker]

I agree with you on this one.

[DarthAzabrush]

My old boss at Postmortem Studios wrote the Hentai cardgame Hentacle. Boy did he get stick for it!

[YeOldeHeretic]

Of course it is not child porn. It is like saying two enthusiastically consenting adults playing out a hostage fantasy {with all the trappings of safe, sane, and sober play} is the same thing as kidnapping. One can be offended by these types of fantasies, but it takes some really fancy mental gymnastics to come to the conclusion that it is a mirror image of the real thing.

Just my ha'penny,

Laurel

[MacNutz2]

Maybe there is something wrong with my eyesight. I don't see any children in the photograph. Women way too young to be of real interest to me, but certainly not children.

This thing of condemning any sexual act that you yourself aren't interested in is silly and frankly hypocritical at times.

Grown women dressing like school girls is one thing. Dressing little girls in sexy lingerie is something entirely different and most objectionable. The two should not be confused.

[gabiotta]

Of course it resembles child pornography, don't be disingenuous.

[Ujames1978Forever]

Dear Gabiotta,

...How? Even Gail Dines herself admitted in the article (now lost) that everything that happened is between consenting adults.

Please watch my video 'It's A Fantasy! It's Consensual! GET OVER IT!!!" In which I pwn similar allegations made regarding 'Furry Cosplay,'

No matter how they are dressed or what role they may perform, consenting adults are consenting adults. And being attracted to a woman pretending to be a cat or a child is still attraction to an adult woman.

[gabiotta]

@Ujames1978Forever

Yes, I get your point, it is not a complicated one.

Dressing up women who have recently passed the age of consent to look as though they might be below the age of consent in order to titillate men who fantasise about having sex with children.

I don't like it. I disapprove of it. I do, however, like porn and consume it enthusiastically. Where do I fit into your simple for/against, you must be the morality police rhetoric?

[ManicRaider]

@Ujames1978Forever I don't agree that this type of stuff leads to pedophlia and child molestation but you have to admit that in your fantasy you're fantasizing about doing it with an underage girl. It doesn't make you a pedophile but it does mean you get sexually charged by thoughts of having sex with a young female child, correct? So because it's a fantasy it's not wrong? So that's saying that the guy who stares at kids in the park is ok as long as he doesn't touch them?

[JohnzaloogIII]

Just a question James, because I feel it is linked to the subject of this vid. What is your opinion of lolicon/shotacon? that is, hentai with underage characters. I would say they aren't real kids, and it hurts nobody so fair game, but what's your call? :)

Johnathan

[Ujames1978Forever]

Dear Johnathan,

If no real people are involved, then there is no problem at all, and I agree with you :-)