Because RNA has a single helix, it can catalyze chemical reactions just like an enzyme. It isn't mumbo jumbo, it's plain logic: if the teartiary and quanternary structure of a protein reactant is changed in way that makes the chem reaction faster you have yourself a catalyst, in our case our lovely one-helixed RNA.
It IS basic biology and biochemistry and as refference I give you Basic Principles of Cell Biology by Alberts and Stryer's Biochemistry. Read more and then try to sell creationism...
@awaisau393 um, yeah, it is true, that you need DNA to make RNA, and RNA to make protein, the basic dogma of life. However, from an evolutionary standpoint, RNA did evolve first. Wiki: RNA_world_hypothesis
@awaisau393 It is basic knowledge that RNA came first. Which one is more stable? DNA. RNA is more prone to mutations thus, that's better for "varied situations." Furthermore, RNA can act as a protein (ribozymes). Meaning, RNA can act like DNA (passing on information) as well as acting like a protein.
Are you serious that you don't understand that RNA came first?
Also, Wikipedia can be edited by anyone...but do you see the links at the bottom? You can read those...for references. Wow...
@awaisau393 I'm in med school. I'm going to assume that you're not judging from your arguments, combined with the fact that instead of coming up with a logical argument, you just try to insult others.
Create RNA on its own? Are you kidding...that's already been done...since the 60s...I just told you where to get "reference"...go to wikipedia...go to the bottom where it says "references"...and it would connect you to the NCBI articles or appropriate places.
@awaisau393 Hm we do have a life actually, it is research. I am sorry but if you want to argue with biologist you damn well better be willing to get your hands dirty with the same rigorous approach to knowledge. It is extremely poncy to not even bother checking citations simply because you "have a life". Ya then you know what? You have no right to put up videos like this and to engage us in any type of discourse!
@cucumbersareawesome And you dont actually need DNA to create RNA. RNA can be used as a template for creation of a complementary strand such as happens in non retroviral RNA viruses. In the case of retro viruses, RNA leads to the creation of DNA rather than the otherway around, proving that DNA did not need to have existed first. It only makes sense that the simpler system consisting of only RNA would have existed first and that the more complex DNA -> RNA would have been a later adaptation.
What the fuck? Giving bacteria a bad rep!! We woud all be dead without most of the bacteria in our bodies. There are 6-10 times as many bacterial cells in the human body as human cells. Ya- trip on that! Thanks for the post it is just sort of heavy on the fear element- it feels like you are leading us to an execution or something the way the guy speaks and really our immune system is amazing!!
They didn't specify against bacteria but instead germs or pathogens, bacteria being one form of them. Just because they chose to use bacteria doesn't mean bacteria aren't good just as you said but bacteria are among the easiest of the pathogens to explain the immune system and all aspect the employment of the 3 lines of defense. Of course humans & most animal would not survive without these bacteria. Such that ruminants would gain no nutrients from their only source of food, plants. Humans also
i think he was refering to how phatogens attack the human body n how are immune system helps to contract that attack, and his right bacteria is every where but thanks to are advanced immune system we dont have to worry about them too much since....
Unlike Adnan Oktar, (former holocaust denier) who is the guy behind this video, I support your right to present differing opinions. He tried to block evolution from being taught in Turkey. I'm not interested in blocking your attempts to inform people about the creationist point of view, but I think it's extremely revealing that you don't mention that point of view in the title or info, and that the video doesn't mention it until halfway through.
this movie is bogus. i won't say that you are wrong. and i won't say that you are right in your beliefs. However, you use all of your videos as proof that there is a god. You cannot prove that god exists with the bible. that is not a valid argument.I cannot support something that claims that god is real by using the bible (it's own creation) as a source.
As much as I find this amusing and entertaining (because you have no argument) I have a life and i will live it because there is no afterlife.
Watch my videos again! I dont use bible, I use SCIENCE to reject the THEORY of evolution (I know Bible is wrong any way... Quran is the true word of God, 100s of scientific facts stated in the Quran have been proven by the science right only recently & not 1 contradicts with science). Live ur life without morals because according to ur believe life is fight 4 survival, u have to win the fight no matter wat happens to people around u. Selfishness, cruelty, hungar all is permissible according to u
Christians never denied that belief in GOD requires faith, as Jesus's fulfillment of prophecy is 1 in 1 + 100 zeroes, however, a greater faith is required in the belief of chance, 1 in 1 +72,000 zeroes.... As GOD created all of us with free will, you are free to choose what you believe, Thanks for the helpful video.
why do you have illnesses then? why do you fall sick? if you control your body cells then you should be healthy all you life, never fall ill or grow into old age!!
Ok, I think before we start to argue whether my cells belong to me or not, we have to clear out some fundamental issues. This will take some text so I apologize beforehand for my English, but I will try to do my best to make myself clear.
Fundamental question no. one is: How did live begin, and to who does it, in consequence, belong? As I assume, your final answer is: live was created by God and therefore finally it´s his....
My answer is: the beginning of live was (and still is) a matter of chance, and therefore it belongs to live itself aka the living thing.
The first requirement for live is, that there is a universe. I agree to that, there have to be elements (with all their characteristics and from them resulting scientific rules) and of course space. How they arised is unknown and therefore a matter of faith, though I still wouldn´t insist on the existence of God, just because humans are unable to research that
However, let´s start with your first argument against live evolving on its own, which was that it contradicts the 3rd rule of thermodynamics which is Entropy. For those who might read this, and do not know what Entropy is, let me explain it with a simple model. Imagine there is a box, filled with blue and red balls at the bottom. One half is filled with blue ones the other with red ones. These balls are highly arranged and therefore the Entropy (disarrangement) is low.
When you agitate the box the balls will mix arbitrarily and the Entropy will increase. The probability that the balls will arrange themselves like in the beginning when we agitate the box again is extremely low. Just a human (or some superior power) could do that, and will have to spend energy to do so. Living things are like this box at the beginning, highly arranged. So how does live manage to create this rearrangement, when it is so extremely unlikely?
When molecules forms, activation energy has to be put into the system and after they have formed, heat is released. And that is basically the answer to the question above. Every living thing releases heat, and heat is the arbitrary movement of small molecules and atoms. This heat increases Entropy, and allows forming high arrangements of molecules in the living thing. The sum of all this heat is emitted into the space and increases its Entropy (maybe therefore the universe is expanding)
So emitting heat is our only weapon against chaos (ironically by increasing it) and the only reason we exist is that chemical reactions releases heat.
Maybe it was like in Miller´s experiment, and the light he used served as activation energy to form amino acids, R/DNA, and lipids. I can also imagine that UV-rays wouldn´t affect the molecules as they were absorbed by the water.Then lipids could have formed micelles and encapsulate hydrophobic amino acids that could have formed peptide bonds.
By and by, forming more arranged molecules and always releasing heat. Maybe this lipid covered bubble can be called the first cell: a closed system that keeps its high organization by releasing heat.
And now evolution comes into play. As it is so unlikely for molecules to form, you might agree with me, that the world is quite hostile towards live. In order to exist, the new molecules have to have some advantage relating to entropy, activation energy and stability compared to the molecule before.
When it doesnt have this advantage it wouldn´t even form. Nothing else is evolution. By chance different and maybe better molecules formed and therefore survived in this particular environment. You might now ask why an organic molecule would form an amino acid, and an amino acid a peptide, and a peptide a protein? Well a fact is that an amino acid has other properties than an organic molecule, as well as a peptide has other properties than an amino acid.
So a protein is more than just the sum of its atoms, it has properties that none of the atoms has. If this property brings out the advantage I mentioned above, it will form! On each hierarchical level new properties are gained, and selected by the criteria I mentioned also above. This will go on and on until it reaches the best adaptation to the present environment.Another question you might ask now is why it is an advantage to be that complex as we humans are? In fact it isn´t.
Simple one cell livings are very well adapted to this world, and thats why their amount on this earth is so proportionally high compared to other, more complex beings. However, complexity is also not a drawback, and offers completely new possibilities to survive (which are actually a plus).
After all this talk I hope you realized that complexity and higher organization are for all intents and purposes able without a superior God commander :)
You need to study fundametals of evolution. Evolution clearly states life evolved from a simple to more complex form. i.e according to evolution the "premitive eye" was much simpler than today's much more complex eye. This clearly contradicts fundamentals of thermodynamic laws.
If the Bible contains errors it doesnt mean that God doesnt exist! u need to look into other religions whose books i.e Quran, dont contain no scientific errors but contains solid scientific facts e.g the big bang
I dont allow shit comments on my videos. Dont just say mistakes point out which mistakes you are talking about and how they are wrong? your comments were too vague...
You can not say in science something which you can not back up! Godcreated? where is the proof? untill you have proof it cannot be accepted in science.
The AIDS virus (which should be known as AIDD as it is nolonger a syndrom but a disease) is a retro virus i.e. RNA not DNAas thevideo states.
It then states again that viruses live with in cells. THEY do not live, they are a set of intructions!
Everything around you, your own body,each and every cell in it. Evolution cannot explain the complexity of life. You cannot prove evolution! Its just a theory put forward by a person who didnt have no clue how complex this universe is.
Whether viruses are living or not is a totally different debate. Evolution cannot be proved by right or wrong by this debate so i wouldnt waste my time arguing over it...
it's not much detailed, but good for many things ..a first is to understand the basic of immune system, second is to realise how much God is powerful;how much he's able to make miracles, and how much human is powerless and he is always in need of Gods help..
THANX AWAISAU for puttin that , May God BLESS U :)
i was lookin for some ineractive videos about the immune system and reponses, to understand more some my lessons of immunology.. i fount this serie of 3 videos ....when i saw them i forgot what i was lookin for lol ,though i know all of these things, but i felt i know them for 1st time..i was really astonished coz its really a miracle from God ,
wow. i'm telling you that i have worked with students who do not understand what AIDS virus means. once they hear that HIV causes AIDS, it clears it up for them. it's a simple mistake. you seem to want to attack people who correct you.
Its "i have worked with students who DID not understand..." You yourself need some english lessons mate, feel really sorry for your students they must be dumb like you that they did not understand the difference between AIDS and HIV even though both abbreviations contain "disease" and "virus" in them.
and this DOES matter, although this is not an english lesson
wtf is this inaccurate shit? if it wasn't for all these semi-professional pseudo scientists, youtube'd be a great source for research on medical topics
No one said in this video that there is dna sructure inside virus!! When in the video it says "AIDs virus", obviously it dont mean that AIDs it self is a virus but it means the virus which causes AIDs! Its like you said "HIV virus", thats wrong! because HIV stands for Human Immunodeficiency Virus! so you dont have to stick virus twice in there calling it Human Immunodeficiency Virus virus!! which dont make sense. Come down England to learn some english dude! what do german's know about english!
"AIDS" is not a virus--it's a syndrome. The virus is "HIV"--the human immune deficiency virus. It does not contain DNA--it contains RNA, an important distinction.
Ok we not having an enlish class here so get to the point. When we say "flu virus" every one knows what we talking about, when we say "aids virus" every one knows what we talking about!!!
it's an important distinction. the public needs to know that HIV causes AIDS -- not everyone knows what we are talking about. i do HIV research. i have met people who have misunderstood what HIV/AIDS means. i think for a lot of them "hiv destroys the immune system, which leads to aids" resolves their issues much of the time.
Ok seems like you didnt study english at school. The term "AIDS virus" means the virus which causes AIDS. Even a child who went to a primary school is taught that. You dont have to be genius to work that out. You should come out of your gaming world and learn some english...
The topic not over yet, those who find some problem in this, please watch the other two parts of this series.... A very nice animation...easy to understand...
This video started out as something I wanted to watch, then I heard "God". What a letdown.
@awaisau393: The bullshit you're spewing has been proven wrong ages ago. You'll find nearly all the information you need here on youtube, but I don't expect you to look up any of it.
I have more than "feel his existence" I have the HolY Spirit Power, strength comes from the Lord, Ive also seen dead people come to live and many more miracles in Christ name. The Bible is not religion but a way for sinful man to have connection with God through Jesus Christ
Physical strength comes from your muscles and psychological strength comes from your brain.
A person isn't truly dead before the conciousness is lost. I doubt you've seen a dead person come to life, you've probably just seen a body restarted before the brain was damaged, simple and it happens all the time.
The bible is an immoral book of hypocrisy, a book of religion. You have no connection to god, you just think you do. Just the brain releasing a little dopamine when you think about god.
Have you seen protons, electrons, neutrons? No! then why do you believe they exist? How do you know that you are not a bastard? What makes u so sure that the man who claims to be your father is your real father? I mean your mum could have slept with any one...
If it wasnt because of religion there wouldnt be no society. Every one would be selfish and mean. There wouldnt be no morals.
No, I haven't, no one have. I believe the theories describing them because they are the best we have, they fit perfectly with what we can observe. God doesn't.
Way to pull a strawman but anyway: Similarities make me sure my father is my father.
If it wasn't for religion we would be so much more advanced (dark ages anyone?).
Atheists aren't more or less selfish than anyone else. Man's morals doesn't come from the bible, the bible's morals comes from man cause the bible comes from man.
Science does not explain everything. For example the existence of life on earth. Mathematicaly its been proven that living things cant come into existence from inanimate matter. How did this universe began?
The Bible contains many errors itself. I never claim it to be from God, people wrote it with their own hands. IF Bible is wrong that dont mean that God does not exist...
Science doesn't explain everything and it doesn't claim to. Science is a method, it is what we use to obtain knowledge about the universe.
The beginning of life is somewhat explained by science though not fully. What is explained is what happened after life began. The evolution theory is very extensive, proven correct on many occasions and never proven wrong.
If something replicates with errors in an environment, evolution is inevitable. D/RNA can form on its own and that is all...
...that is needed. Evolution doesn't even need to be about life. Religions evolve based on a form of selection just as life does. Ironic, isn't it? Evolution is simply the process of something changing and adapting over generations.
The bible proves nothing. It doesn't mean god exists and it doesn't mean he doesn't exist. The thing is that nothing indicates that any god exists and therefore I choose not to believe.
I know what word "evolution" means, it can be used in many places and it would fit but as far as evolution of species is concerned its not true. Evolution is NOT science its a theory which contradicts many fundamental laws of science! I dont know how you say that evolution is proven right on many occasions but im affraid THERE IS NO PROOF FOR EVOLUTION. If u have any proofs represent it to me, im happy to look at it...
A theory in science is an explanation; everything is explained by theories. Theories of gravity, relativity, evolution, etc. Evolution is definitely science.
For proof you can start with the fossil and DNA records, both are very extensive. Don't start talking about transitional fossils, every fossil is a transitional fossil.
Gravity & relativity are backed by solid scientific proof & mathematical calculations. On the contrary Evolution contradicts some fundamental scientific laws as well as mathematical calculations.
No fossils have ever been found which support evolution. All the fossil records confirm that living things were created fully & completely. Fossils shout out NO EVOLUTION OCCURED. DNA is too complex to have formed by evolution so i dont know which DNA record u talking about...
No, it doesn't. What are you talking about? Evolution is very easy to understand and comprehend, just watch some videos about it.
The fossil record is extremely large, something I don't think you realise. Everything (fossils, genetics, carbon dating, other forms of dating, etc.) supports it. Please educate yourself more on the matter before making claims.
Evolution contradicts with the 3rd law of thermodynamics also known as law of entropy. It is a very bad way to learn about evolution just by looking at some random videos.
Exactly see you dont know yourself any fossil proving evolution. I just asked you 1 example just one. Why is it so hard to get one example from this "extremely large" record?
Evolution doesn't contradict with the third law of thermodynamics. I've also seen others say that and it's wrong, something you'd know if you understood what evolution is. Watch a documentary or get your information from other sources if you will. As long as the source is credible it's all good.
Why do you want "one" example? The fossil record itself is a great example that shows the gradual changes in species over time. Every fossil is transitional, if that's what you're talking about.
I gave you an example of "evolution contradicting science". By you shouting that "Evolution doesn't contradict..." wouldnt change anything.
I am unaware of any fossils proving evolution right and trust me i've done more research on the topic than you can ever imagine... I have never found such fossil record which supports evolution so i ask u to put forward ATLEAST one example which supports evolution.
You want me to explain entropy to you then? That would take a little too much time and characters but here is a good explanation: tinyurl(dot)com(slash)5vesny
The fossil record is the example. You see the gradual, sequential change that happens over time. Various dating methods confirm the sequentiality of it and the fact that the Earth is more than 6000 years old. That makes a hell of a lot more sense than "it's complex so god did it."
Stop directing me to different websites. Give me a simple and explicit explaination of entropy just like i give you.
Watch my other videos on fossil record. They PROVE that fossil record does not support evolution. I have never said earth is 6000 years old! You assume things out of thin air. Just because earth is millions of years old does not mean evolution is right!
Okay, I've been in classes that have had extensive evolution units. And you want to make an argument of how there is not ONE fossil that supports this LAW.
I will give you your example. Palaeolagus. pre-historic rabbits. And you claim that you have "studied" the topic.
You would understand these beautifully presented arguments if you graduated high school.
There really is no point in arguing anymore. I can see that your uneducated and ignorant mind is far too inferior to comprehend these ideas.
DNA could not have formed on its own. A little biology lesson for u. DNA replicates itself by the help of special enzymes and the information about these enzymes is encrypted in the DNA... One cant exist before the other unless it is CREATED. Foot prints on a path indicate some one just been walking here, feaces in the middle of a desert indicate that an animal passed from here. This vast universe with all its balances shouts out loud that it has a Creator. Look it your own body...
DNA probably didn't form on its own, but RNA might have. Exactly how it happened is unknown and it's up to science to figure it out. There are hypotheses. One thing that's proven is that the necessary amino acids can form on its own.
My own body is not representative for the beginning of life. Its complexity is an inevitable result of millions of years of evolution though.
Obviously you dont have no clue as to what DNA or RNA is. Without DNA u cannot have RNA because RNA. Do your home work. Share the proof with me which says amino acids can form on its own...
Would you like to explain how exactly did the parts of your body evolve? i.e. in an eye 20 different parts work together in order for it to see. If 1 of these parts is missing the whole eye will be useless. So the eye made of 1 part will have no advantage what so ever. SO no reason for evolution...
RNA can be and is the genome of some organisms, like viroids. The primordial soup contains what is needed to form amino acids and over millions of years they will form. There are studies, just search for them.
It's easy to imagine how the eye could have evolved. Watch ZPcwLyJ0hGU for a short but good explanation.
Yeah over millions of years they will for out of nothing. Ok letssay a protien is formed, the U-V rays from sun would destroy it completely within mins after its formed coz there was no ozon layer.
Read the comments below the video for the eye u gaveme, you'll get your answer. In that video they make it look like the eye is the simplest thing in the world. They need to be reminded that eye is the much more complex than simple drawings by a 10 year old.
UV radiation doesn't penetrate water very far and this was happening in the ocean.
The point of the video is to show how a complex structure can evolve from something very simple. Of course the eye is more complex than the drawings, but that is irrelevant.
Ammino acids join together by a condensation reaction to form protein chain and laws of chemistry tell us condensation reaction cannot take place in hydrous conditions. So the formation of protein in water is disproven by scientific laws.
No the video does not recognise that eye is a complex structure. It simplifies the functions of eyes hundrads of times to fool people like. Study how the eye functions and then look at the video and you will know the difference...
I'm pretty sure you're thinking of dehydration reactions. There is no reason as to why a condensation reaction that doesn't release water can't happen in water. Also, cells are about 70% water and it happens there.
Yes, it simplifies the eye and thus the explanation (to make it easier to understand), but that doesn't mean it's wrong. The exact same thing happened in the real world, it just took more time and involved some extra details, but the basics are the same.
This is a law of chemistry, its called Le Chatelier's Principle. You need to understand more about structure of the cell to know how the protiens are made in there. In your brain cell is just a little sack with lot of water in there but the reality is a single living cell is more complex than an entire city!
No! it simplifies eye structure so you can fit your little evolution into it. No matter how much you study the simple structure of the eye, u will never be able to become an eye surgeon.
I'm well aware of the structure of cells and Le Chatelier's principle. What I said in the comment you're replying to is based on that principle. You really need to read more about this because your claims are old and long since refuted.
What the example is used to explain is still the same (the principle that is) and that is all that matters. Compare the example to a less evolved eye if you will.
Thats what I meant!!! He had a clue to what he was talking about but he was wrong! So i told him that yes! you do have a clue to what you talking about (by using 2 negatives) but what you have in your head is wrong". So there is nothing wrong with my vocabulary. As I said, this is too complicated for you sweet heart, go play with your barbies...
A little Bio Lesson for you.. from someone who knows about biology.
DNA actually evolved from RNA.
some protists (the first forms of life) that had RNA evolved into multicelled organisms (like you or me). We have both DNA and RNA. However, during evolution and the process of natural selection, DNA prevailed. Hence, our ancestors, protists, are far inferior to us and have RNA and therefore have a harder time replicating.
You need to study basic bio yourself dude! It is impossible for RNA to exist with out DNA because RNA is TRANSCRIBED from the DNA. With out DNA you cannot have RNA. Learn basic biology and then come and preach it to others...
well what about retroviruses? they use RNA as a template. DNA gets transcribed from RNA via reverse transcriptase in that case. You could take exception to emKRU18's claim that protists are early life forms which use RNA as a template, which is total nonsense. We didn't evolve from protists, and protists do NOT use RNA as its genetic material, although DNA probably did evolve from RNA.
@awaisau393 Hi, If you are going to go w/ the facts you learned in your biology class, you should acknowledge that emKRU18 is actually right. DNA did evolve from RNA, since there is not much of a difference, actually just "Deoxy" part...which makes DNA more flexible to use.
@cucumbersareawesome "RNA is transcribed from DNA by enzymes called RNA polymerases and is generally further processed by other enzymes." If u dont have DNA u cant get RNA. Should have concentrated on ur bio at school kid!
@awaisau393 OMG are you serious?? hahahahaha u sound kinda retarded by saying this. RNA came before DNA! everybody knows that. Yes it needs DNA to be transcribed and all, but RNA came first.
never debate about God creation... everything are created with its purpose. if you live with healthy lifestyle (physical, emotional, social relationship)
HIV cause by having dangerous activity with sex... do that with wrong person, for wrong way, and wrong purpose... then welcome AIDS!
The AIDS virus? I assume he means HIV? Also, it's not DNA based, as someone said, HIV is RNA based and contains reverse transcriptase. As someone else said as well, viruses are not classified as living things. So many errors in this video...
AIDS is a disease caused by HIV virus. As RNA is compliment of DNA it is impossible to have RNA without the use of DNA. How can a none living thing be so clever as to "hide" inside a living cell and take over its activities and put them to its own use? Whether Viruses are living or non-living is another debate the main purpose of this video is to refute darwinism which it does supperbly!
No viruses have both DNA and RNA, they have one or the other, which is the reason that they're not classified among living organisms. Whether you believe in God or not is your own business, I'm just taking issue with the incorrect info in the video about viruses. When was this video made?
listen to the content the sentence is being said in! clearly "..AIDS virus.." means virus which causes AIDS! If we follow your stance it would mean that your statement which trying to say "HIV virus" is wrong aswell!! because you using the word "virus" twice i.e. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Virus!
all I wanna say that ,, please open your mind 'truthly' that you will accept any thing can convince you .. and deeply think about your self , life , earth , the universe ..
Come on .. cant you see how great the universe is working , the plants are rolling around itself & others in tightly regular fascinating manner ,even crushings are for reasons .. cant u see how universe is going in tightly regulating that we never can say ,it just came hubhazardly or accidently ..
however ,,i was interested in the debate between fretbuzz6 & awaisau393 so i went through it ..
am strongly convenienced with the idea that God is the creator of every thing ,and when fretbuzz said that he or she questions every thing . I just wanna tell u .. I do ,too. I never blindly believed in any thing ..
But yeah, I believe I've had my say on this video, and a few other things. I think I'll be going. I'll check back on those comments just for laughs in seeing what you say but this debate/argument/whatever is done between you and I. Enjoy your life, I hope everything works out for you, I hope you're right about Islam, there has to be some sort of truth out there, right? May you have the best of luck obtaining it.
That's why humans need to learn something over and over before they can understand it, like learning math. In some aspect of a chimp's lifestyle, good short-term memory has become important for its survival. In contrast I haven't heard of any long-term memory experients done on chimps so I couldn't comment on that, but that's one thing humans are better at.
Just putting it out there that another animal species can learn, in a relative sense, and accomplish some things better than we could.
Guy I'm saying a chimpanzee's brain has superior short-term memory in comparison with a human's. That's not to say we aren't more gifted in other aspects. Stop taking what I'm saying far out of context. They conducted experiments that follow all known logic -- they tested several human's and chimp's short term memory and found chimps possess far greater short-term memory. That isn't saying we arn't perfect though, we just don't need a complex short-term memory system for our way of lives.
Another thing you should look into is that Charles Darwin wasn't the only person to come up with the idea of evolution through natural selection. During the same time in another part of the world, Alfred Wallace was forming the same conclusion, Darwin just beat him to the publishing. A little random information for ya.
In short, a chimps brain has far superior short-term memory than a human's brain has. Go do some research on that one, but I know you won't because science isn't your cup of tea. But there you go, the human brain has a flaw!
may be you should now find a way to swap your brain with a chimps'. Dont know about you but atleast I wouldnt have to answer your stupid illogic questions.
Imagine you had a computer program that shows 10 cards upside-down. When you click the mouse, the cards flip over for exactly 1 second and flip back upside-down. The cards each have a random number (1 to 20) on them. A chimpanzee can immediately remember all the numbers each card had and then press each card in numerical order on a touch screen. Can humans do that? Nope. Thus, our bodies lack sufficient short term memory and as a result, are NOT PERFECT.
Are you trying to tell me chimp brain is better than humans'? I dont think so mate. There might be some good things about animals' brains but when you compare over all, Humans are the best without needing any further improvement.
"Produce a genuine sceintific arguement to disprove what I said."
All right, I will. First, learn how to spell scientific and argument..
"Our bodies are perfect! This is what makes us superior to all the animals."
No. We are superior to other animals because we can use tools. And no, our bodies are not perfect. They are the best they can be for us through adaptation from environmental stimulus.
Ok so now an american will teach an english man how to speak english! I dont think you realise that to use a tool you need a brain (btw i dont think you got one anyway) which is part of the body. Find me a single defect in a healthy human body? I dont know about you but thank God my body is perfect, may be you want to be more like a superman, batman or spiderman. dont worry, keep waiting in your imaginary world, may be some day that "usefull mutation" will transform you.
It doesn't matter if you don't like what I say, you don't delete other people's comments. That's called censorship, effectively "shutting up" what you don't want others to hear.
Did you even bother to read on past the first sentence on "teacher's domain"? Obviously not because you are still rambling about the universe being comprised of more than just H and He. I dare you to read on, it explains where the other 89 (Li was always present) elements were derived from.
and change the name of your video to "darwin was wrong because god created your immune system" so people who actually want to learn don't sit through your mindless dribble. you're just practicing the art of deception.
The title is just fine. The video explains HOW the immune system works and then reasons that such a complex system could not have arisen as a result of blind mutations and natural selection.
"No where does it say in the title "HOW DOES immune system work?"..my main objective of uploading this video (and other videos) is to refute darwinism which I think this (and other) video(s) do superbly.."
he even claims it's every religious follower's duty to proclaim the word of god to everyone. that's cool you have a belief but people like you disgust me. save your self-righteous godly praises for people with similar beliefs.
Again you just chatting through your ass. Produce a genuine sceintific arguement to disprove what I said. But no you want to lick darwin's ass because he provided you with a belief which goes according to your desires.
Why do you keep deleting my comments, kid? I've seen 3 get removed for no reason. All I said in one was to genuinely google search "origin of the elements" to prove that we are composed of elements manufactured inside of stars and you go ahead and erase it? That's a victory on my part and officially ends this argument. And no, I do not wish to read your religious ramblings for the sole reason that I know you will never pick up a physics book in your life if you can't even do legitimate research.
"All liquids, gases, and solids found on our planet are made from one or more of 92 naturally occurring elements", This is what it says on the first search result, which is exactly what I have been telling you all along. THERE ARE 92 NATURALLY OCCURING ELEMENTS NOT JUST HE AND H2. The reason I deleted your compents was because you dont listen to me and keep going on and on with your bullshit. I havent got time to keep up with your bull.
"For all that and the happy life after death you have to turn towards a religion (Islam)."
You know, I really wish I could be like you and actually believe in the idea of eternal happiness after death. If that's what gets you by in this life, great more power to ya. But I'm just another curious human in this world and I like to learn through my senses and experiences, not be told to believe and never to question. I question EVERYTHING. And on that peaceful note, I'm off.
You think i blindly believe in Islam??? NO WAY! I read Quran and found some scientific facts, which a man could never have known 1400 years ago. This was enough for me to except that it is the word of God and not man. (If u want i can email you all that)
finally yes we are made up of the same shit stars are made of whether you want to believe it or not. the universe started with H, He and trace amounts of Li. All other elements in the universe were manufactured in the center of stars and spit out in supernovas. Please Please Please read a physics book. You'll need to if you ever want to master chemistry. I'm telling you to go out and buy a non-religious biased physics book, since i started laughing when you said...
You need to go and pick up a periodic table from you primary school books and it wont take you long to realise that there are other elements in the universe as well. Now dont start telling me that all the elements of periodic table came from Helium and Hydrogen! lol you should be given a noble prize in stupidity. By the way its chemistry not physics.
seriously, it offends me you want me to believe god controls my immune system. when medicine is created, highly skilled organic chemists design and synthesize (obviously) carbon based compounds to interact with your body is a predetermined manner...yeah, they can do that, and i know this because i'm majoring in organic chem right now. you insult my intelligence with your godly babel.
Well maybe you should put your knowledge to work and create medicines which have a 100% cure rate. Treatment does not always give a cure! As far as I know people may have the same disease but same treatment will not work for all of them. You tell me, does these chemists just pull out these carbon based compounds out of the thin air? No! who is the creator of carbon and other elements? God! now He has given us the knowledge to use these elements to make new compounds for our benefits.
but....just for shits and giggles i'll attempt to shed some facts on your skewed vision of the universe. your mommy really brainwashed your ass good while upbringing you. sad children are easily persuaded if you hammer in religious ideals on the daily. i went to a christian school for 3 years and the only thing i learned were bible stories, bible verses, and an absolute shit science curriculum. so don't sit their and tell me i need to study medicine to understand how god controls my immunity.
See the problem with you! If Bible and Christianity is wrong that does not mean all the other religions are wrong as well. You have to do your research and pick the right one for yourself. I have have done my research and I only found the truth in Islam. Science gives you skills and art for this world, it doesnt tell you how to live your life in a moral way or whether to harm other people or not. For all that and the happy life after death you have to turn towards a religion (Islam).
We as a human species stand here today questioning everything with curiosity just as our ancestors did. We are a present-day result of a universe attempting to understand itself. We are comprised of the same shit stars are made of. It's cool you have something to believe in, but please refrain from stating "the intelligence of your immune system and every phase of it belongs to God".
That's almost like dark age catholic church scare tactics, spewing out propaganda that god controls your health.
Most of the stars are made of H2 and He. I dont think I am made of any gases may be you are. Well the statement is 100% right. No blind mechanism like evolution can create such an intelligent and complex system. God does control your health! you will have to study medicine in order to understand it. If our medicine had cure in it then all the people going to hospital would come out healthy but that doesnt happen all the times. Our medication benifits us only when God wants it to.
"New type of molecular system was born" i ask, HOW & WHY?
From billions of years of these proteins and organic compounds interacting, mixing about and having easy transfer of electrons in the electrochemical water environment. Put a bunch of monkeys in a room with a typewriter and they will write shakespeare is exactly what I'm saying here. We are the fluke result of a giant bath full of the ingredients for life as we know it.
if transfer of electrons was so easy to create new proteins and molecular systems then today in we would have created many intermediate species such as half human-half ape, half reptile-half bird etc to prove evolution right. i dont know which monkeys you are in touch with but i dont think any monkey can ever write shakespeare on a typewriter even in billions of years. you watch too many science fiction movies..
your welcome... Just trying to educate people as well as telling them the true nature and face of science which most but not all scientists hide these days...
"there was enough U-V rays from sun which would have destroyed anything made because there was no ozone layer."
UV radiation doesn't penetrate water very far. Once you have life splitting the hydrogen from the water, oxygen rises and accumulates in the atmosphere. Once there is enough, the upper layer of O2 is bombarded with UV which breaks up the diatomic oxygen molecules. Each O atom then bonds to a nearby O2 atom to form ozone. Marine life is now safe to move out of the oceans.
I just told you it would have been impossible for the synthesis of protein underwater, by the laws of chemistry. "Marine life is now safe to move out of water", HOW & WHY? I never seen fish comming out of water and surviving even for few hours, have you?
Furthermore, I don't consider describing the immune system with little animations of missiles and army's to be the correct way of explaining how it works. Cute though.. As if stating "the intelligence of your immune system and every phase of it belongs to God" during the video didn't throw all scientific credibility out the window.
Nobody is refuting science here. How the immune system works in science BUT science did not creat this complex system. what I say is "science is law of God". As the greatest scientist, Einstein says, "science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind"..
Somebody with some sound chemistry background would easily take in and understand what I've just said.. however you do not, therefore I advise you to sit back and believe in whatever you want to believe while at the same time letting others exercise that same right.
Viruses...
tedoymisojos 2 months ago
Aww, only 240p :(
tomtomgags 3 months ago in playlist More videos from awaisau393
omg mateeee, get to the point ! 9 mins wasted of examination review time
KimmyKimChi 7 months ago
hëhe_Ï_fÉÈl_sO_lÔñélY_tOÐäý
LunaiJaneaa572 8 months ago
lol mormin style (god an all i mean)
tzaralbert 8 months ago
@tzaralbert yeah lol they lost me at god...
joshuajmv1 4 months ago
wow. this is ridiculous. i mean, wow.
5Paramour8 8 months ago
Could the quality possibly be any worse?
Phisher491 9 months ago
colóquenle unos subtitulos a español porfavor
yuliviza1026 9 months ago
brain cells - scientists :P
TheFunky333 10 months ago
Because RNA has a single helix, it can catalyze chemical reactions just like an enzyme. It isn't mumbo jumbo, it's plain logic: if the teartiary and quanternary structure of a protein reactant is changed in way that makes the chem reaction faster you have yourself a catalyst, in our case our lovely one-helixed RNA.
It IS basic biology and biochemistry and as refference I give you Basic Principles of Cell Biology by Alberts and Stryer's Biochemistry. Read more and then try to sell creationism...
Doppelgangergr 1 year ago
what a stupid background music.
soadl80 1 year ago
Subhanallah! Wonderful!! thank you =D
jdnash88 1 year ago
too damn silly
paranoidboytoy 1 year ago
you are absolutely right: you can be smarter and use pubmed (NCBI)....since I can't post the link directly on here
cucumbersareawesome 1 year ago
@awaisau393 um, yeah, it is true, that you need DNA to make RNA, and RNA to make protein, the basic dogma of life. However, from an evolutionary standpoint, RNA did evolve first. Wiki: RNA_world_hypothesis
cucumbersareawesome 1 year ago
@cucumbersareawesome You get ur scientific knowledge from wiki! well done! u should know anyone and every one can put whatever they want on it...
awaisau393 1 year ago
@awaisau393 It is basic knowledge that RNA came first. Which one is more stable? DNA. RNA is more prone to mutations thus, that's better for "varied situations." Furthermore, RNA can act as a protein (ribozymes). Meaning, RNA can act like DNA (passing on information) as well as acting like a protein.
Are you serious that you don't understand that RNA came first?
Also, Wikipedia can be edited by anyone...but do you see the links at the bottom? You can read those...for references. Wow...
nescionesum 1 year ago
@nescionesum Even in the most advanced laboratories have scientists have been able to create RNA on its own!
Anyone can make the references up.. I dont have enough time to check each and every reference up, I actually have a life unlike u.
awaisau393 1 year ago
@awaisau393 I'm in med school. I'm going to assume that you're not judging from your arguments, combined with the fact that instead of coming up with a logical argument, you just try to insult others.
Create RNA on its own? Are you kidding...that's already been done...since the 60s...I just told you where to get "reference"...go to wikipedia...go to the bottom where it says "references"...and it would connect you to the NCBI articles or appropriate places.
nescionesum 1 year ago
@awaisau393 your life is a complete waste of biological matter
antiprotonable 9 months ago
@awaisau393 Hm we do have a life actually, it is research. I am sorry but if you want to argue with biologist you damn well better be willing to get your hands dirty with the same rigorous approach to knowledge. It is extremely poncy to not even bother checking citations simply because you "have a life". Ya then you know what? You have no right to put up videos like this and to engage us in any type of discourse!
daiitokumyouou899 8 months ago in playlist immunoglobulin
@awaisau393 Also, there's no need to be a troll...
nescionesum 1 year ago
@cucumbersareawesome And you dont actually need DNA to create RNA. RNA can be used as a template for creation of a complementary strand such as happens in non retroviral RNA viruses. In the case of retro viruses, RNA leads to the creation of DNA rather than the otherway around, proving that DNA did not need to have existed first. It only makes sense that the simpler system consisting of only RNA would have existed first and that the more complex DNA -> RNA would have been a later adaptation.
Agispsi 9 months ago
Comment removed
awser44 1 year ago
you can count the pixels in this video
richardwebster23 2 years ago
"You will also realise that the intelligence which prevails in this war... belongs to God, the creator"... Wait, what?
Religion, GET THE HELL OF SCIENCE'S TURF.
F1ghtingFalcon 2 years ago
Yea....wtf was that all about lol
timbom3 1 year ago
Get over yourself and then get to the effin point... pretty please.
Brasik1 2 years ago
How to Strengthen the immune system (437%)against viral infection such as swine flu and..
more info: inmune4@yahoo.con
ExitoGlobal 2 years ago
.con? Doesn't that say it all?
copperblade 2 years ago
Hahahahah, this is awsome. I love the Science Fiction of this doco. It's like in vitro Star Wars. The music is wicked.
Pretty general information wise, but high on the entertainment-edu-tainment value.
hemansteve 2 years ago
thanks for the kind sharing*
dracentsparkle 2 years ago
What the fuck? Giving bacteria a bad rep!! We woud all be dead without most of the bacteria in our bodies. There are 6-10 times as many bacterial cells in the human body as human cells. Ya- trip on that! Thanks for the post it is just sort of heavy on the fear element- it feels like you are leading us to an execution or something the way the guy speaks and really our immune system is amazing!!
frenchylemone 2 years ago
They didn't specify against bacteria but instead germs or pathogens, bacteria being one form of them. Just because they chose to use bacteria doesn't mean bacteria aren't good just as you said but bacteria are among the easiest of the pathogens to explain the immune system and all aspect the employment of the 3 lines of defense. Of course humans & most animal would not survive without these bacteria. Such that ruminants would gain no nutrients from their only source of food, plants. Humans also
AuzzieClimber 2 years ago
i think he was refering to how phatogens attack the human body n how are immune system helps to contract that attack, and his right bacteria is every where but thanks to are advanced immune system we dont have to worry about them too much since....
NaJiStar 2 years ago
Jim Humble MMS will knock that shit out !!
Squabbles10 2 years ago
He stole the music from "The Rock" with sean connery and nicholas cage.
gmaro2 2 years ago
Unlike Adnan Oktar, (former holocaust denier) who is the guy behind this video, I support your right to present differing opinions. He tried to block evolution from being taught in Turkey. I'm not interested in blocking your attempts to inform people about the creationist point of view, but I think it's extremely revealing that you don't mention that point of view in the title or info, and that the video doesn't mention it until halfway through.
retron23 2 years ago
this movie is bogus. i won't say that you are wrong. and i won't say that you are right in your beliefs. However, you use all of your videos as proof that there is a god. You cannot prove that god exists with the bible. that is not a valid argument.I cannot support something that claims that god is real by using the bible (it's own creation) as a source.
As much as I find this amusing and entertaining (because you have no argument) I have a life and i will live it because there is no afterlife.
emKRU18 2 years ago
Watch my videos again! I dont use bible, I use SCIENCE to reject the THEORY of evolution (I know Bible is wrong any way... Quran is the true word of God, 100s of scientific facts stated in the Quran have been proven by the science right only recently & not 1 contradicts with science). Live ur life without morals because according to ur believe life is fight 4 survival, u have to win the fight no matter wat happens to people around u. Selfishness, cruelty, hungar all is permissible according to u
awaisau393 2 years ago
Christians never denied that belief in GOD requires faith, as Jesus's fulfillment of prophecy is 1 in 1 + 100 zeroes, however, a greater faith is required in the belief of chance, 1 in 1 +72,000 zeroes.... As GOD created all of us with free will, you are free to choose what you believe, Thanks for the helpful video.
veritassetsyoufree 2 years ago
"Every Face of it belongs to God?!"
My body cells belongs to me!! There is no God "Commander" coordinating the immune response. That´s ridiculous!!
llaz83 3 years ago
why do you have illnesses then? why do you fall sick? if you control your body cells then you should be healthy all you life, never fall ill or grow into old age!!
awaisau393 3 years ago
Ok, I think before we start to argue whether my cells belong to me or not, we have to clear out some fundamental issues. This will take some text so I apologize beforehand for my English, but I will try to do my best to make myself clear.
Fundamental question no. one is: How did live begin, and to who does it, in consequence, belong? As I assume, your final answer is: live was created by God and therefore finally it´s his....
llaz83 3 years ago
My answer is: the beginning of live was (and still is) a matter of chance, and therefore it belongs to live itself aka the living thing.
The first requirement for live is, that there is a universe. I agree to that, there have to be elements (with all their characteristics and from them resulting scientific rules) and of course space. How they arised is unknown and therefore a matter of faith, though I still wouldn´t insist on the existence of God, just because humans are unable to research that
llaz83 3 years ago
However, let´s start with your first argument against live evolving on its own, which was that it contradicts the 3rd rule of thermodynamics which is Entropy. For those who might read this, and do not know what Entropy is, let me explain it with a simple model. Imagine there is a box, filled with blue and red balls at the bottom. One half is filled with blue ones the other with red ones. These balls are highly arranged and therefore the Entropy (disarrangement) is low.
llaz83 3 years ago 2
When you agitate the box the balls will mix arbitrarily and the Entropy will increase. The probability that the balls will arrange themselves like in the beginning when we agitate the box again is extremely low. Just a human (or some superior power) could do that, and will have to spend energy to do so. Living things are like this box at the beginning, highly arranged. So how does live manage to create this rearrangement, when it is so extremely unlikely?
llaz83 3 years ago
When molecules forms, activation energy has to be put into the system and after they have formed, heat is released. And that is basically the answer to the question above. Every living thing releases heat, and heat is the arbitrary movement of small molecules and atoms. This heat increases Entropy, and allows forming high arrangements of molecules in the living thing. The sum of all this heat is emitted into the space and increases its Entropy (maybe therefore the universe is expanding)
llaz83 3 years ago
So emitting heat is our only weapon against chaos (ironically by increasing it) and the only reason we exist is that chemical reactions releases heat.
Maybe it was like in Miller´s experiment, and the light he used served as activation energy to form amino acids, R/DNA, and lipids. I can also imagine that UV-rays wouldn´t affect the molecules as they were absorbed by the water.Then lipids could have formed micelles and encapsulate hydrophobic amino acids that could have formed peptide bonds.
llaz83 3 years ago
By and by, forming more arranged molecules and always releasing heat. Maybe this lipid covered bubble can be called the first cell: a closed system that keeps its high organization by releasing heat.
And now evolution comes into play. As it is so unlikely for molecules to form, you might agree with me, that the world is quite hostile towards live. In order to exist, the new molecules have to have some advantage relating to entropy, activation energy and stability compared to the molecule before.
llaz83 3 years ago
When it doesnt have this advantage it wouldn´t even form. Nothing else is evolution. By chance different and maybe better molecules formed and therefore survived in this particular environment. You might now ask why an organic molecule would form an amino acid, and an amino acid a peptide, and a peptide a protein? Well a fact is that an amino acid has other properties than an organic molecule, as well as a peptide has other properties than an amino acid.
llaz83 3 years ago
So a protein is more than just the sum of its atoms, it has properties that none of the atoms has. If this property brings out the advantage I mentioned above, it will form! On each hierarchical level new properties are gained, and selected by the criteria I mentioned also above. This will go on and on until it reaches the best adaptation to the present environment.Another question you might ask now is why it is an advantage to be that complex as we humans are? In fact it isn´t.
llaz83 3 years ago
Simple one cell livings are very well adapted to this world, and thats why their amount on this earth is so proportionally high compared to other, more complex beings. However, complexity is also not a drawback, and offers completely new possibilities to survive (which are actually a plus).
After all this talk I hope you realized that complexity and higher organization are for all intents and purposes able without a superior God commander :)
Kind greets and a free mind to everyone *peace*
llaz83 3 years ago 2
You need to study fundametals of evolution. Evolution clearly states life evolved from a simple to more complex form. i.e according to evolution the "premitive eye" was much simpler than today's much more complex eye. This clearly contradicts fundamentals of thermodynamic laws.
If the Bible contains errors it doesnt mean that God doesnt exist! u need to look into other religions whose books i.e Quran, dont contain no scientific errors but contains solid scientific facts e.g the big bang
awaisau393 3 years ago
Why did you remove my comment about the clear mistakes in this video?
magnersnice 3 years ago
I dont allow shit comments on my videos. Dont just say mistakes point out which mistakes you are talking about and how they are wrong? your comments were too vague...
awaisau393 3 years ago
I statedthe mistake.
You can not say in science something which you can not back up! Godcreated? where is the proof? untill you have proof it cannot be accepted in science.
The AIDS virus (which should be known as AIDD as it is nolonger a syndrom but a disease) is a retro virus i.e. RNA not DNAas thevideo states.
It then states again that viruses live with in cells. THEY do not live, they are a set of intructions!
magnersnice 3 years ago
Everything around you, your own body,each and every cell in it. Evolution cannot explain the complexity of life. You cannot prove evolution! Its just a theory put forward by a person who didnt have no clue how complex this universe is.
Whether viruses are living or not is a totally different debate. Evolution cannot be proved by right or wrong by this debate so i wouldnt waste my time arguing over it...
awaisau393 3 years ago
it's not much detailed, but good for many things ..a first is to understand the basic of immune system, second is to realise how much God is powerful;how much he's able to make miracles, and how much human is powerless and he is always in need of Gods help..
THANX AWAISAU for puttin that , May God BLESS U :)
EyesOfPower10Y 3 years ago
i was lookin for some ineractive videos about the immune system and reponses, to understand more some my lessons of immunology.. i fount this serie of 3 videos ....when i saw them i forgot what i was lookin for lol ,though i know all of these things, but i felt i know them for 1st time..i was really astonished coz its really a miracle from God ,
EyesOfPower10Y 3 years ago
A simple mathematical equation like fractals can form COMPLEX COMPLEX COMPLEXgeamotrical structures
fresstrivec 3 years ago
So how exactly does that prove evolution right?
awaisau393 3 years ago
I have to Agree with Flarsen.
If you look at fossil's you can read it like Mother Nature has written it.
fresstrivec 3 years ago
Which fossils have you been reading??
awaisau393 3 years ago
GOD IS GOD!!!
right...
or maybe your all crazy... just saying i dont hear voice's
kombat420wombat 3 years ago
wow. i'm telling you that i have worked with students who do not understand what AIDS virus means. once they hear that HIV causes AIDS, it clears it up for them. it's a simple mistake. you seem to want to attack people who correct you.
cpricejones 3 years ago
Its "i have worked with students who DID not understand..." You yourself need some english lessons mate, feel really sorry for your students they must be dumb like you that they did not understand the difference between AIDS and HIV even though both abbreviations contain "disease" and "virus" in them.
awaisau393 3 years ago
aids is not a virus,
there's no dna chain inside the HIV virus!
and this DOES matter, although this is not an english lesson
wtf is this inaccurate shit? if it wasn't for all these semi-professional pseudo scientists, youtube'd be a great source for research on medical topics
ThaiFabi 3 years ago
No one said in this video that there is dna sructure inside virus!! When in the video it says "AIDs virus", obviously it dont mean that AIDs it self is a virus but it means the virus which causes AIDs! Its like you said "HIV virus", thats wrong! because HIV stands for Human Immunodeficiency Virus! so you dont have to stick virus twice in there calling it Human Immunodeficiency Virus virus!! which dont make sense. Come down England to learn some english dude! what do german's know about english!
awaisau393 3 years ago
"AIDS" is not a virus--it's a syndrome. The virus is "HIV"--the human immune deficiency virus. It does not contain DNA--it contains RNA, an important distinction.
cpricejones 3 years ago
Ok we not having an enlish class here so get to the point. When we say "flu virus" every one knows what we talking about, when we say "aids virus" every one knows what we talking about!!!
awaisau393 3 years ago
it's an important distinction. the public needs to know that HIV causes AIDS -- not everyone knows what we are talking about. i do HIV research. i have met people who have misunderstood what HIV/AIDS means. i think for a lot of them "hiv destroys the immune system, which leads to aids" resolves their issues much of the time.
cpricejones 3 years ago
Ok seems like you didnt study english at school. The term "AIDS virus" means the virus which causes AIDS. Even a child who went to a primary school is taught that. You dont have to be genius to work that out. You should come out of your gaming world and learn some english...
awaisau393 3 years ago
The topic not over yet, those who find some problem in this, please watch the other two parts of this series.... A very nice animation...easy to understand...
EmanAmna 3 years ago
This video started out as something I wanted to watch, then I heard "God". What a letdown.
@awaisau393: The bullshit you're spewing has been proven wrong ages ago. You'll find nearly all the information you need here on youtube, but I don't expect you to look up any of it.
FLarsen 3 years ago
How is it proven wrong boy? give me a proof!!
awaisau393 3 years ago
As I said, you'll find what you need on youtube. Just look it up.
Begin with Potholer54's and Potholer54debunks' videos. Also check out Tunderf00t's videos.
You must remember that you are the one making claims, so the burden of proof lies on you.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Also, the argument "it's complex so God did it" is a logical fallacy.
FLarsen 3 years ago
God is real my friend, you need to repent Amen.
TURNTOCHRIST 3 years ago
I don't think so and I can find no reason to.
You say he's real, but have you ever observed him? I think not.
Do you feel his existence? Then your so called god is probably just dopamine in your brain.
Have you seen a miracle? Then you've probably just seen a statistical inevitability.
Whatever your so called reason to believe in god is, it's probably been debunked ages ago. Religion is just pointless and degrading to society.
FLarsen 3 years ago
I have more than "feel his existence" I have the HolY Spirit Power, strength comes from the Lord, Ive also seen dead people come to live and many more miracles in Christ name. The Bible is not religion but a way for sinful man to have connection with God through Jesus Christ
TURNTOCHRIST 3 years ago
Physical strength comes from your muscles and psychological strength comes from your brain.
A person isn't truly dead before the conciousness is lost. I doubt you've seen a dead person come to life, you've probably just seen a body restarted before the brain was damaged, simple and it happens all the time.
The bible is an immoral book of hypocrisy, a book of religion. You have no connection to god, you just think you do. Just the brain releasing a little dopamine when you think about god.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Have you seen protons, electrons, neutrons? No! then why do you believe they exist? How do you know that you are not a bastard? What makes u so sure that the man who claims to be your father is your real father? I mean your mum could have slept with any one...
If it wasnt because of religion there wouldnt be no society. Every one would be selfish and mean. There wouldnt be no morals.
awaisau393 3 years ago
No, I haven't, no one have. I believe the theories describing them because they are the best we have, they fit perfectly with what we can observe. God doesn't.
Way to pull a strawman but anyway: Similarities make me sure my father is my father.
If it wasn't for religion we would be so much more advanced (dark ages anyone?).
Atheists aren't more or less selfish than anyone else. Man's morals doesn't come from the bible, the bible's morals comes from man cause the bible comes from man.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Science does not explain everything. For example the existence of life on earth. Mathematicaly its been proven that living things cant come into existence from inanimate matter. How did this universe began?
The Bible contains many errors itself. I never claim it to be from God, people wrote it with their own hands. IF Bible is wrong that dont mean that God does not exist...
awaisau393 3 years ago
Science doesn't explain everything and it doesn't claim to. Science is a method, it is what we use to obtain knowledge about the universe.
The beginning of life is somewhat explained by science though not fully. What is explained is what happened after life began. The evolution theory is very extensive, proven correct on many occasions and never proven wrong.
If something replicates with errors in an environment, evolution is inevitable. D/RNA can form on its own and that is all...
FLarsen 3 years ago
...that is needed. Evolution doesn't even need to be about life. Religions evolve based on a form of selection just as life does. Ironic, isn't it? Evolution is simply the process of something changing and adapting over generations.
The bible proves nothing. It doesn't mean god exists and it doesn't mean he doesn't exist. The thing is that nothing indicates that any god exists and therefore I choose not to believe.
FLarsen 3 years ago
I know what word "evolution" means, it can be used in many places and it would fit but as far as evolution of species is concerned its not true. Evolution is NOT science its a theory which contradicts many fundamental laws of science! I dont know how you say that evolution is proven right on many occasions but im affraid THERE IS NO PROOF FOR EVOLUTION. If u have any proofs represent it to me, im happy to look at it...
awaisau393 3 years ago
A theory in science is an explanation; everything is explained by theories. Theories of gravity, relativity, evolution, etc. Evolution is definitely science.
For proof you can start with the fossil and DNA records, both are very extensive. Don't start talking about transitional fossils, every fossil is a transitional fossil.
By the way, it's proof, not proofs.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Gravity & relativity are backed by solid scientific proof & mathematical calculations. On the contrary Evolution contradicts some fundamental scientific laws as well as mathematical calculations.
No fossils have ever been found which support evolution. All the fossil records confirm that living things were created fully & completely. Fossils shout out NO EVOLUTION OCCURED. DNA is too complex to have formed by evolution so i dont know which DNA record u talking about...
awaisau393 3 years ago
No, it doesn't. What are you talking about? Evolution is very easy to understand and comprehend, just watch some videos about it.
The fossil record is extremely large, something I don't think you realise. Everything (fossils, genetics, carbon dating, other forms of dating, etc.) supports it. Please educate yourself more on the matter before making claims.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Evolution contradicts with the 3rd law of thermodynamics also known as law of entropy. It is a very bad way to learn about evolution just by looking at some random videos.
Exactly see you dont know yourself any fossil proving evolution. I just asked you 1 example just one. Why is it so hard to get one example from this "extremely large" record?
awaisau393 3 years ago
Evolution doesn't contradict with the third law of thermodynamics. I've also seen others say that and it's wrong, something you'd know if you understood what evolution is. Watch a documentary or get your information from other sources if you will. As long as the source is credible it's all good.
Why do you want "one" example? The fossil record itself is a great example that shows the gradual changes in species over time. Every fossil is transitional, if that's what you're talking about.
FLarsen 3 years ago
I gave you an example of "evolution contradicting science". By you shouting that "Evolution doesn't contradict..." wouldnt change anything.
I am unaware of any fossils proving evolution right and trust me i've done more research on the topic than you can ever imagine... I have never found such fossil record which supports evolution so i ask u to put forward ATLEAST one example which supports evolution.
awaisau393 3 years ago
You want me to explain entropy to you then? That would take a little too much time and characters but here is a good explanation: tinyurl(dot)com(slash)5vesny
The fossil record is the example. You see the gradual, sequential change that happens over time. Various dating methods confirm the sequentiality of it and the fact that the Earth is more than 6000 years old. That makes a hell of a lot more sense than "it's complex so god did it."
FLarsen 3 years ago
Stop directing me to different websites. Give me a simple and explicit explaination of entropy just like i give you.
Watch my other videos on fossil record. They PROVE that fossil record does not support evolution. I have never said earth is 6000 years old! You assume things out of thin air. Just because earth is millions of years old does not mean evolution is right!
awaisau393 3 years ago
Okay, I've been in classes that have had extensive evolution units. And you want to make an argument of how there is not ONE fossil that supports this LAW.
I will give you your example. Palaeolagus. pre-historic rabbits. And you claim that you have "studied" the topic.
You would understand these beautifully presented arguments if you graduated high school.
There really is no point in arguing anymore. I can see that your uneducated and ignorant mind is far too inferior to comprehend these ideas.
emKRU18 2 years ago
DNA could not have formed on its own. A little biology lesson for u. DNA replicates itself by the help of special enzymes and the information about these enzymes is encrypted in the DNA... One cant exist before the other unless it is CREATED. Foot prints on a path indicate some one just been walking here, feaces in the middle of a desert indicate that an animal passed from here. This vast universe with all its balances shouts out loud that it has a Creator. Look it your own body...
awaisau393 3 years ago
DNA probably didn't form on its own, but RNA might have. Exactly how it happened is unknown and it's up to science to figure it out. There are hypotheses. One thing that's proven is that the necessary amino acids can form on its own.
My own body is not representative for the beginning of life. Its complexity is an inevitable result of millions of years of evolution though.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Obviously you dont have no clue as to what DNA or RNA is. Without DNA u cannot have RNA because RNA. Do your home work. Share the proof with me which says amino acids can form on its own...
Would you like to explain how exactly did the parts of your body evolve? i.e. in an eye 20 different parts work together in order for it to see. If 1 of these parts is missing the whole eye will be useless. So the eye made of 1 part will have no advantage what so ever. SO no reason for evolution...
awaisau393 3 years ago
RNA can be and is the genome of some organisms, like viroids. The primordial soup contains what is needed to form amino acids and over millions of years they will form. There are studies, just search for them.
It's easy to imagine how the eye could have evolved. Watch ZPcwLyJ0hGU for a short but good explanation.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Yeah over millions of years they will for out of nothing. Ok letssay a protien is formed, the U-V rays from sun would destroy it completely within mins after its formed coz there was no ozon layer.
Read the comments below the video for the eye u gaveme, you'll get your answer. In that video they make it look like the eye is the simplest thing in the world. They need to be reminded that eye is the much more complex than simple drawings by a 10 year old.
awaisau393 3 years ago
UV radiation doesn't penetrate water very far and this was happening in the ocean.
The point of the video is to show how a complex structure can evolve from something very simple. Of course the eye is more complex than the drawings, but that is irrelevant.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Ammino acids join together by a condensation reaction to form protein chain and laws of chemistry tell us condensation reaction cannot take place in hydrous conditions. So the formation of protein in water is disproven by scientific laws.
No the video does not recognise that eye is a complex structure. It simplifies the functions of eyes hundrads of times to fool people like. Study how the eye functions and then look at the video and you will know the difference...
awaisau393 3 years ago
I'm pretty sure you're thinking of dehydration reactions. There is no reason as to why a condensation reaction that doesn't release water can't happen in water. Also, cells are about 70% water and it happens there.
Yes, it simplifies the eye and thus the explanation (to make it easier to understand), but that doesn't mean it's wrong. The exact same thing happened in the real world, it just took more time and involved some extra details, but the basics are the same.
FLarsen 3 years ago
This is a law of chemistry, its called Le Chatelier's Principle. You need to understand more about structure of the cell to know how the protiens are made in there. In your brain cell is just a little sack with lot of water in there but the reality is a single living cell is more complex than an entire city!
No! it simplifies eye structure so you can fit your little evolution into it. No matter how much you study the simple structure of the eye, u will never be able to become an eye surgeon.
awaisau393 3 years ago
I'm well aware of the structure of cells and Le Chatelier's principle. What I said in the comment you're replying to is based on that principle. You really need to read more about this because your claims are old and long since refuted.
What the example is used to explain is still the same (the principle that is) and that is all that matters. Compare the example to a less evolved eye if you will.
FLarsen 3 years ago
Le Chatelier's principle is not a theory which can be refuted, its a established principle. It is part of science...
awaisau393 3 years ago
"Obviously you dont have no clue as to what DNA or RNA is."
a double negative. intelligent.
Do you realize that you sound like a barbarian (of whom you evolved)?
This actually means, if you state it correctly:
"Obviously you have a clue as to what..." the two negatives cancel out. You would know, claiming to know about math as well.
Do you know about English and grammar?
Obviously not. Your arguments do not sound legit because you do not have the extensive vocabulary to back it up, therefore...
emKRU18 2 years ago
Thats what I meant!!! He had a clue to what he was talking about but he was wrong! So i told him that yes! you do have a clue to what you talking about (by using 2 negatives) but what you have in your head is wrong". So there is nothing wrong with my vocabulary. As I said, this is too complicated for you sweet heart, go play with your barbies...
awaisau393 2 years ago
A little Bio Lesson for you.. from someone who knows about biology.
DNA actually evolved from RNA.
some protists (the first forms of life) that had RNA evolved into multicelled organisms (like you or me). We have both DNA and RNA. However, during evolution and the process of natural selection, DNA prevailed. Hence, our ancestors, protists, are far inferior to us and have RNA and therefore have a harder time replicating.
emKRU18 2 years ago
You need to study basic bio yourself dude! It is impossible for RNA to exist with out DNA because RNA is TRANSCRIBED from the DNA. With out DNA you cannot have RNA. Learn basic biology and then come and preach it to others...
awaisau393 2 years ago
well what about retroviruses? they use RNA as a template. DNA gets transcribed from RNA via reverse transcriptase in that case. You could take exception to emKRU18's claim that protists are early life forms which use RNA as a template, which is total nonsense. We didn't evolve from protists, and protists do NOT use RNA as its genetic material, although DNA probably did evolve from RNA.
irboyd 2 years ago
Comment removed
irboyd 2 years ago
@awaisau393 Hi, If you are going to go w/ the facts you learned in your biology class, you should acknowledge that emKRU18 is actually right. DNA did evolve from RNA, since there is not much of a difference, actually just "Deoxy" part...which makes DNA more flexible to use.
cucumbersareawesome 1 year ago
@cucumbersareawesome "RNA is transcribed from DNA by enzymes called RNA polymerases and is generally further processed by other enzymes." If u dont have DNA u cant get RNA. Should have concentrated on ur bio at school kid!
awaisau393 1 year ago
@awaisau393 OMG are you serious?? hahahahaha u sound kinda retarded by saying this. RNA came before DNA! everybody knows that. Yes it needs DNA to be transcribed and all, but RNA came first.
janeissupercool123 1 year ago
never debate about God creation... everything are created with its purpose. if you live with healthy lifestyle (physical, emotional, social relationship)
HIV cause by having dangerous activity with sex... do that with wrong person, for wrong way, and wrong purpose... then welcome AIDS!
hheheh...
manyapearl 3 years ago
what do you mean "the wrong person?"
AwesomePictures 3 years ago
err....
right, are you on something?
coogiez 3 years ago
Damn germs lol.
jacko39 3 years ago
The AIDS virus? I assume he means HIV? Also, it's not DNA based, as someone said, HIV is RNA based and contains reverse transcriptase. As someone else said as well, viruses are not classified as living things. So many errors in this video...
lordofthesox 3 years ago
AIDS is a disease caused by HIV virus. As RNA is compliment of DNA it is impossible to have RNA without the use of DNA. How can a none living thing be so clever as to "hide" inside a living cell and take over its activities and put them to its own use? Whether Viruses are living or non-living is another debate the main purpose of this video is to refute darwinism which it does supperbly!
awaisau393 3 years ago
The video presents it as if AIDS is the virus.
No viruses have both DNA and RNA, they have one or the other, which is the reason that they're not classified among living organisms. Whether you believe in God or not is your own business, I'm just taking issue with the incorrect info in the video about viruses. When was this video made?
lordofthesox 3 years ago
listen to the content the sentence is being said in! clearly "..AIDS virus.." means virus which causes AIDS! If we follow your stance it would mean that your statement which trying to say "HIV virus" is wrong aswell!! because you using the word "virus" twice i.e. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Virus!
awaisau393 3 years ago
viruses arnt organisms, because they do not meet the classification standereds, instead they are reffered to non-cellular agents
mitch4907 3 years ago
all I wanna say that ,, please open your mind 'truthly' that you will accept any thing can convince you .. and deeply think about your self , life , earth , the universe ..
Come on .. cant you see how great the universe is working , the plants are rolling around itself & others in tightly regular fascinating manner ,even crushings are for reasons .. cant u see how universe is going in tightly regulating that we never can say ,it just came hubhazardly or accidently ..
linabtb 3 years ago
hi,thanx for the video .
however ,,i was interested in the debate between fretbuzz6 & awaisau393 so i went through it ..
am strongly convenienced with the idea that God is the creator of every thing ,and when fretbuzz said that he or she questions every thing . I just wanna tell u .. I do ,too. I never blindly believed in any thing ..
linabtb 3 years ago
wow i like the sound effects
somedudeanonymous 3 years ago
You're right, it's RNA based. . .but obviously that RNA has information in it. So how did that information get there?
tristenmc 3 years ago
that's a silly question! obviously the spaghetti monster put it in there!
ramen
janlennart 3 years ago
Well whatever you want to call it. . .it would certainly be more intelligent than we are, that much is certain.
tristenmc 3 years ago
But yeah, I believe I've had my say on this video, and a few other things. I think I'll be going. I'll check back on those comments just for laughs in seeing what you say but this debate/argument/whatever is done between you and I. Enjoy your life, I hope everything works out for you, I hope you're right about Islam, there has to be some sort of truth out there, right? May you have the best of luck obtaining it.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
That's why humans need to learn something over and over before they can understand it, like learning math. In some aspect of a chimp's lifestyle, good short-term memory has become important for its survival. In contrast I haven't heard of any long-term memory experients done on chimps so I couldn't comment on that, but that's one thing humans are better at.
Just putting it out there that another animal species can learn, in a relative sense, and accomplish some things better than we could.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
Guy I'm saying a chimpanzee's brain has superior short-term memory in comparison with a human's. That's not to say we aren't more gifted in other aspects. Stop taking what I'm saying far out of context. They conducted experiments that follow all known logic -- they tested several human's and chimp's short term memory and found chimps possess far greater short-term memory. That isn't saying we arn't perfect though, we just don't need a complex short-term memory system for our way of lives.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
An excellent and fascinating film. Wow thanks for posting.
flossy100 3 years ago
Another thing you should look into is that Charles Darwin wasn't the only person to come up with the idea of evolution through natural selection. During the same time in another part of the world, Alfred Wallace was forming the same conclusion, Darwin just beat him to the publishing. A little random information for ya.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
In short, a chimps brain has far superior short-term memory than a human's brain has. Go do some research on that one, but I know you won't because science isn't your cup of tea. But there you go, the human brain has a flaw!
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
may be you should now find a way to swap your brain with a chimps'. Dont know about you but atleast I wouldnt have to answer your stupid illogic questions.
awaisau393 3 years ago
Imagine you had a computer program that shows 10 cards upside-down. When you click the mouse, the cards flip over for exactly 1 second and flip back upside-down. The cards each have a random number (1 to 20) on them. A chimpanzee can immediately remember all the numbers each card had and then press each card in numerical order on a touch screen. Can humans do that? Nope. Thus, our bodies lack sufficient short term memory and as a result, are NOT PERFECT.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
Are you trying to tell me chimp brain is better than humans'? I dont think so mate. There might be some good things about animals' brains but when you compare over all, Humans are the best without needing any further improvement.
awaisau393 3 years ago
"Produce a genuine sceintific arguement to disprove what I said."
All right, I will. First, learn how to spell scientific and argument..
"Our bodies are perfect! This is what makes us superior to all the animals."
No. We are superior to other animals because we can use tools. And no, our bodies are not perfect. They are the best they can be for us through adaptation from environmental stimulus.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
Ok so now an american will teach an english man how to speak english! I dont think you realise that to use a tool you need a brain (btw i dont think you got one anyway) which is part of the body. Find me a single defect in a healthy human body? I dont know about you but thank God my body is perfect, may be you want to be more like a superman, batman or spiderman. dont worry, keep waiting in your imaginary world, may be some day that "usefull mutation" will transform you.
awaisau393 3 years ago
It doesn't matter if you don't like what I say, you don't delete other people's comments. That's called censorship, effectively "shutting up" what you don't want others to hear.
Did you even bother to read on past the first sentence on "teacher's domain"? Obviously not because you are still rambling about the universe being comprised of more than just H and He. I dare you to read on, it explains where the other 89 (Li was always present) elements were derived from.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
OH yh and that proves that religion is wrong!.. a very stupid logic!
awaisau393 3 years ago
and change the name of your video to "darwin was wrong because god created your immune system" so people who actually want to learn don't sit through your mindless dribble. you're just practicing the art of deception.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
The title is just fine. The video explains HOW the immune system works and then reasons that such a complex system could not have arisen as a result of blind mutations and natural selection.
awaisau393 3 years ago
awaisau393 is a troll.
"No where does it say in the title "HOW DOES immune system work?"..my main objective of uploading this video (and other videos) is to refute darwinism which I think this (and other) video(s) do superbly.."
he even claims it's every religious follower's duty to proclaim the word of god to everyone. that's cool you have a belief but people like you disgust me. save your self-righteous godly praises for people with similar beliefs.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
Again you just chatting through your ass. Produce a genuine sceintific arguement to disprove what I said. But no you want to lick darwin's ass because he provided you with a belief which goes according to your desires.
awaisau393 3 years ago
Why do you keep deleting my comments, kid? I've seen 3 get removed for no reason. All I said in one was to genuinely google search "origin of the elements" to prove that we are composed of elements manufactured inside of stars and you go ahead and erase it? That's a victory on my part and officially ends this argument. And no, I do not wish to read your religious ramblings for the sole reason that I know you will never pick up a physics book in your life if you can't even do legitimate research.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
"All liquids, gases, and solids found on our planet are made from one or more of 92 naturally occurring elements", This is what it says on the first search result, which is exactly what I have been telling you all along. THERE ARE 92 NATURALLY OCCURING ELEMENTS NOT JUST HE AND H2. The reason I deleted your compents was because you dont listen to me and keep going on and on with your bullshit. I havent got time to keep up with your bull.
awaisau393 3 years ago
"For all that and the happy life after death you have to turn towards a religion (Islam)."
You know, I really wish I could be like you and actually believe in the idea of eternal happiness after death. If that's what gets you by in this life, great more power to ya. But I'm just another curious human in this world and I like to learn through my senses and experiences, not be told to believe and never to question. I question EVERYTHING. And on that peaceful note, I'm off.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
You think i blindly believe in Islam??? NO WAY! I read Quran and found some scientific facts, which a man could never have known 1400 years ago. This was enough for me to except that it is the word of God and not man. (If u want i can email you all that)
awaisau393 3 years ago
finally yes we are made up of the same shit stars are made of whether you want to believe it or not. the universe started with H, He and trace amounts of Li. All other elements in the universe were manufactured in the center of stars and spit out in supernovas. Please Please Please read a physics book. You'll need to if you ever want to master chemistry. I'm telling you to go out and buy a non-religious biased physics book, since i started laughing when you said...
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
You need to go and pick up a periodic table from you primary school books and it wont take you long to realise that there are other elements in the universe as well. Now dont start telling me that all the elements of periodic table came from Helium and Hydrogen! lol you should be given a noble prize in stupidity. By the way its chemistry not physics.
awaisau393 3 years ago
seriously, it offends me you want me to believe god controls my immune system. when medicine is created, highly skilled organic chemists design and synthesize (obviously) carbon based compounds to interact with your body is a predetermined manner...yeah, they can do that, and i know this because i'm majoring in organic chem right now. you insult my intelligence with your godly babel.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
Well maybe you should put your knowledge to work and create medicines which have a 100% cure rate. Treatment does not always give a cure! As far as I know people may have the same disease but same treatment will not work for all of them. You tell me, does these chemists just pull out these carbon based compounds out of the thin air? No! who is the creator of carbon and other elements? God! now He has given us the knowledge to use these elements to make new compounds for our benefits.
awaisau393 3 years ago
but....just for shits and giggles i'll attempt to shed some facts on your skewed vision of the universe. your mommy really brainwashed your ass good while upbringing you. sad children are easily persuaded if you hammer in religious ideals on the daily. i went to a christian school for 3 years and the only thing i learned were bible stories, bible verses, and an absolute shit science curriculum. so don't sit their and tell me i need to study medicine to understand how god controls my immunity.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
See the problem with you! If Bible and Christianity is wrong that does not mean all the other religions are wrong as well. You have to do your research and pick the right one for yourself. I have have done my research and I only found the truth in Islam. Science gives you skills and art for this world, it doesnt tell you how to live your life in a moral way or whether to harm other people or not. For all that and the happy life after death you have to turn towards a religion (Islam).
awaisau393 3 years ago
We as a human species stand here today questioning everything with curiosity just as our ancestors did. We are a present-day result of a universe attempting to understand itself. We are comprised of the same shit stars are made of. It's cool you have something to believe in, but please refrain from stating "the intelligence of your immune system and every phase of it belongs to God".
That's almost like dark age catholic church scare tactics, spewing out propaganda that god controls your health.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
Most of the stars are made of H2 and He. I dont think I am made of any gases may be you are. Well the statement is 100% right. No blind mechanism like evolution can create such an intelligent and complex system. God does control your health! you will have to study medicine in order to understand it. If our medicine had cure in it then all the people going to hospital would come out healthy but that doesnt happen all the times. Our medication benifits us only when God wants it to.
awaisau393 3 years ago
"New type of molecular system was born" i ask, HOW & WHY?
From billions of years of these proteins and organic compounds interacting, mixing about and having easy transfer of electrons in the electrochemical water environment. Put a bunch of monkeys in a room with a typewriter and they will write shakespeare is exactly what I'm saying here. We are the fluke result of a giant bath full of the ingredients for life as we know it.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
if transfer of electrons was so easy to create new proteins and molecular systems then today in we would have created many intermediate species such as half human-half ape, half reptile-half bird etc to prove evolution right. i dont know which monkeys you are in touch with but i dont think any monkey can ever write shakespeare on a typewriter even in billions of years. you watch too many science fiction movies..
awaisau393 3 years ago
immune system is our protect sistem from cancer or bacteria and so on.bacteria recognaized not self,cancer is also not self.
we don't know immune system about pregnanncy.baby is not self for the mother.
immune system resembles army.
I know Bcell,Tcell,helper,NKcell,memoryBcell,plasma
cell,CD4,CD8,CD28,CD86,MHC,and so on.
our blood,immune system is amazing.but difficult to understand,and arergy is scary.
immune cell was born in thyms,bone.I must study about my body,espitialy immune.
chinenyuki 3 years ago
wow, Intense. what's with the low rating? because of the God reference? let's lighten up, shall we
thanks for uploading
kookoobabe 3 years ago
your welcome... Just trying to educate people as well as telling them the true nature and face of science which most but not all scientists hide these days...
awaisau393 3 years ago
"there was enough U-V rays from sun which would have destroyed anything made because there was no ozone layer."
UV radiation doesn't penetrate water very far. Once you have life splitting the hydrogen from the water, oxygen rises and accumulates in the atmosphere. Once there is enough, the upper layer of O2 is bombarded with UV which breaks up the diatomic oxygen molecules. Each O atom then bonds to a nearby O2 atom to form ozone. Marine life is now safe to move out of the oceans.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
I just told you it would have been impossible for the synthesis of protein underwater, by the laws of chemistry. "Marine life is now safe to move out of water", HOW & WHY? I never seen fish comming out of water and surviving even for few hours, have you?
awaisau393 3 years ago
Furthermore, I don't consider describing the immune system with little animations of missiles and army's to be the correct way of explaining how it works. Cute though.. As if stating "the intelligence of your immune system and every phase of it belongs to God" during the video didn't throw all scientific credibility out the window.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago
Nobody is refuting science here. How the immune system works in science BUT science did not creat this complex system. what I say is "science is law of God". As the greatest scientist, Einstein says, "science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind"..
awaisau393 3 years ago
Somebody with some sound chemistry background would easily take in and understand what I've just said.. however you do not, therefore I advise you to sit back and believe in whatever you want to believe while at the same time letting others exercise that same right.
fretbuzz6 3 years ago