Added: 4 years ago
From: TheCanadianSoldier
Views: 42,318
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (251)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if the american player was smart and circled the marder not only would it have killed the marder but it would've perhaps crushed the grens

  • that's cool how the barrel of the gun glows red after firing.

  • Marder Rules^^

  • cant you choose your own color instade of being blue nazi O_o

  • @HITTHISHELLBOY you are ever blue, the enemy red...

    but in some mods you can put the colors off

  • i've killed marder with machine gun team, so how the fuck did sherman lost?

  • repair guys

  • Dude that tank hunter is so cool, it could down a Sherman with a crappy commander.

  • american is an obvious noob any decent player would have circle straffed

  • lol, marder was in its effective fire position, and there were billion guys repairing it, so retarded video.

  • If that sherman had bothered with the 50.cal upgrade the Marder III would have lost, along with a couple squads of infantry...

  • thats shit its not fair dude ^^

  • man this looks soo ugly and unrealistic with out the Normandy 1944 Mod for it

  • one shot in the rapairing infi and them down ^^

  • ee marder was repeair :p !!

  • OWNED

  • LOL!!! Of course you won because panzergrenadiers very repairing the marder!!!!

  • the sherman should've started moving the moment the marder locked-down.. than circle around it and since the grenadiers seem to have no AT capabilities, the sherman could have won this..

  • Marder loses!!! oh FUCK....BOOOOM

  • Lol my one Marder took out like 3 of my dad's Cromwells cuz they kept turning ass first then backing up into my locked down Marder......he just gave up after that

  • lol nice one :D

  • Marders and panthers are only AT non doctrinal vechicles that PE has. Thats why marder has so much damage - more than the firefly or a Tiger I, the same as 57mm and 17pounder. These weapones differ in armour penetraltion.

  • Ah yeah.. lol i love those PE even if now there under power from Roos and junk.

  • unfair battel

  • the sherman could have goten out of there....

  • good point

  • yep :) common sense lol

  • you are repairing the marder? then its easy to win

  • umm sherman will beat the marder but shis dude had it backed by riffle men so it was not fair

  • the Marder is an IFV, so that tank isn't a Marder.

  • You need to go back to history.

    That is a Marder!

  • If you're talking about the modern Marder , yes it's an IFV. But we're talking about the Marder in WW2. So shut it.

  • wolfies = OP = no skill

  • its amazing how we actually bloody won ww2 when you take alook at teh germans technology and war machines alot of the axis weapons were ten years ahead of its time

  • the germans were just completely outnumbered, with a war basically on all fronts possible

  • True... And the most interesting thing is he have been stopped in Soviet Union, by the winter. A same way like Napoleon

    US - Faith for Americas victory, quite advanced gun tech

    GB - Dominating on the Seas

    USSR - many of people and quite good propaganda

    Nazi - High military tech, aggressive tactics, luck, propaganda and most important surprise attack

    Japan - Their faith and bushido

    Sherman is a medium tank. It's gives not too much damage, quite weak armor, and it's to high. Nazi had better tanks.

  • russian no1 defense is its MUD and SNOW^_^ its proven

  • I dont agree with your interpretation of the US. All of the US guns were outdated.

  • Only US had all weapons half-automatic or machineguns. Only Springfield wasn't, because automatic guns had worse accuracy than guns like Springfield (i dont know how it calls in english). The truth is the USA was ready to war when WW2 begun.

  • ummm, no?

    M1 Garand: Not the standard infantry rifle but used at times, started production in 1930's

    Thompson: SMG Made during the 20's.

    BAR: LMG started production in 1917

    M1919 Browning machine gun:

    Produced in 1918.

    M1 carbine: Was the only 'new' american firearm produced in 1938-1941.

  • Compare that to German guns:

    Karabiner 98 Kurz: Standard infantry rifle, very accurate. Produced 1935-1945.

    MP40:German submachine gun, produced from 1940.

    STG44: Worlds first assualt rifle, produced late 1943.

    MG34: German GPMG, produced from 1935 but replaced by

    MG42: German LMG and HMG, Mass produced, produced from 1942.

    G43: Reliable semi-auto rifle able to be equipped with telescopic sights. Produced from 1943.

  • if there was Soviet Union(like it should bee) T-34 would crush everbody(in real it would but i don`t really know on game)...

  • it will be like jaghpanther that can turn his turret around and faster...

  • A shermen would destroy that Piece

  • Sherman was a poor tank made in stupidly large numbers

  • the marder is a tank destroyer. and it was being repaired and it's gun was sighted.

  • not only that, but PE was vastly overpowered in earlier patches, most tanks take damage penalties against AT weapons, and that sherman could have easily circle-strafed that Marder.

  • The player with the Marder was cheating

  • that us guy is just retarded

  • no he isnt the Grman guy is he has like 5 squads repairing him, he would be owned by that sherman

  • the sherman main target is the marder if he dont kill it he will be destroyed, so the PE player, does i good, if the sherman was supported by inf, it was a other story

  • Marder kinda reminds me of M10 Tankbuster

  • King Tiger PWN all

  • no but the Jagdpanther

  • Yeah!

  • good thing about marder, if it's well placed and set down for max power it could take or wound a tank badly, best tactic for open field is have 2 marder stationed a 2 spread out to prevent flank 1 slightly above the other 1, so 2 marder wont get flank

  • dude looks like u cant do a video will real fight between these two units... (1) not fixing while fighting (2) not turning sherman ... and btw sherman can destroy marder by flanking it...

  • Him turning at the last second exposed his weak side armour... fail sherman...

  • whoever was using that sherman was Crap . he could've just killed like 10 infantry with one shot

  • Sherman must use his mobility and flank the marder.

  • haha the marder has really strong attacks but the armor is shit an mg can do alot of damage to it even without the AP rounds unlike other tanks it cant do shit

  • First off your repairing (not a fair fight). Second you have an advantage he has lower health. Thirdly the guy you are facing doesnt know how to tank battle if given half a brain he would have run down your men with his sherman and then blown your tank. L2P!!

    Gratz!

  • Its hardly his fault! He won that battle but who knows he could have lost some. Its mostly how you use your units and tactics that win a fight.

  • true of course the marder will win lol

  • If the US guy didn't suck he could have eaisly circled and killed the marder.

  • U were repairing it wile dieing xD

  • i dont really like panzer elite, wehrmatcht is more my playing style. i like to secure points early with an MG in a building and panzer elite cant do that

  • in real it would be important who shoot at first. with one shoot a marder 3 with his pak 40 could take out the sherman and the shermman could destroy the marder with one shot too ...

    but in the game the shermancommander was an idiot :D he could get around the marder so his enemy couldn't shoot ^^

  • You cant flank the Marder while its in lock-down with one tank. The marder always keeps his gun pointed against the Sherman. SO if the sherman would attempted to go around the Marder, the marder would of turned

  • The Marder has practically no armor, one shot from the Sherman would destroy it. On the flip side though, the PaK40 on the Marder is powerful enough to take out the Sherman in one hit.

  • flank the marder, it could help.

  • Well the Marder did have like 3 crews fixing it while the sherman was firing at it.

  • its all the same with allied players. ffs "a sherman should take down a panther" " a sherman should take down a marder" shermans were massed produced but german tanks alone could beat a sherman any day. shermans always attacked in numbers because they knew a german tank would win 1 on 1, german tank crews were better aswell. im english and what did we do to a sherman? what did we do? put a 17 pounder at gun which could then tackle german armor. english technolgy and knowlege lol

  • ya but shermans r 2 expnesive in this game.The whole point of the shreman is to outnumber german tanks but you can do that

  • Of course, the premise of CoH is that you try to keep your units alive instead of mindlessly throwing them at enemy units... Since you are only able to purchase so many units before you're broke.

  • wtf there were guys fixing it

  • Germany is better :P haha

  • yeah GErman quality is better yes!, The germans had the best equiptment of WW2

  • seriously though the mico of the allied player is horrible, an m8 can take downa marder if it just drives in circles around it

  • Your right, but that is cheap!

  • Seriously waaaaaaaaaay to unbalanced. I was driving a sherman with upgraded gun full HP.

    The Marder had half HP and locked down. We shot at eachother and the marder won..

  • yeah but in real life the Marder 3 had a 88mm Pak 43 mm gun and the sherman had a L3 76mm who would win ,i think the marder would win

  • All u bitches are such noobs. Shermans in real and in games are da same!!! da sherman is a great tank but da thing is dat its gun and armour were too weak for tigers and king tigers which only shermans will only rule their ground is by da team work of air support, arty support and the infantry!

    so dont go commenting on shermans dat u dont know commenting on shermans if u dont know such true info!

    and tungkid95, i agree with him!! da mardar was crawling with repairs even after getting shot.

  • Lern 2 spel prply

  • this is what happens when niggers comment videos

  • That was lame. The Sherman just stood there and let the Marder take shots at it. Also the Marder was locked in where it loses mobility for more powerful shots. The Sherman should have gone around to the flank or do a tactical retreat.

  • The Sherman missed 2 shot,and it didnt reach full health,and the marder is crawling with repairers around,with out this the sherman will win.

    (The sherman controller is a noob btw...)

  • But marder really sucks with quick tanks ;)

  • the marder is basicly a AT gun on tracks but its outdated armor SUCKS!

  • Wehrmacht is better than the allies, The Rocket, The Tiger and my favorite the StuG are making the Wehrmacht nearly unbeatable.

    And Guys dont forget, it is a Computergame

    Down with the Nazis ? Dude in WWII there had been more german (child-) soldiers who werent a Nazi in anyway.

    Learn some more about history to avoid those comments

  • yea. children-soldiers inferiorated by the hateful shit that the nazis drilled into them... nazi youth who were crazed. i now history too.

  • those panzer grenadiers definitely influenced the fight :P

    generally a sherman can take out a marder if it hits first, thanks to the marders bogus armor, but if the marder makes first git, preferably a rear armor hit, it can win easily....

  • I think those engineers slightly influenced the fight :P

  • how does it call this game?

  • Yeah this game has a lot of balance problems, but the person controlling the Sherman was a noob. it is very easy to kill a Marder with circling it. The Sherman should be less expensive when the main gun isent upgraded.

  • yes because we didnt see a repair symbol apear above the marader at all did we people? :/

  • or the 100 engineers surrounding it

  • dude ever heard of circle strafing?

  • This is fucked up balance:

    Sherman - 420, 90

    Marder - 300, 40

    Marder 50% hp vs Sherman FRESH. Marder wins, front against front. RETARDED

  • yup i cant seem to win vs axis, probably why i see everyone wanting to be axis.... lol the AT guns on allies side are shit compared to the germans camo AT gun and the king tiger.... lol

  • na the sherman should of won u can see theres also a heap of guys repairing the damage

  • however, even if you shoot first the armor in the maurder is strong enough to resist 75mm rounds, and the gun in the maurder is higher velocity, more powerful.

  • The marder is a tank hunter while the sherman is a inf support tank and not build 100% for Armour battle though luckly it was mass produced.

  • Kennyboy0077 not all germans are/was nazis. and the german soldiers aren't allowed to be a member of a political party

  • dude its just a friggin game..... :P

    whats the big deal if u play as the germans

    they had better weapons anyway, in the game and in world war 2.....

    cheers

  • The germans didn't necessarily have 'better weapons.' The standard Wehrmacht soldier used a Kar98k, which was bolt action, against an M1 Garand semi-automatic rifle. When it came to man-to-man combat, the M1 was superior. Germany simply couldn't outfit all of its troops with superior weaponry on an individual basis.

  • in later war the mp44 came out witch kicked alot of ass in close range but it came way too late in the war to really matter

  • germans, allies, british they all have certain OP aspects so your points are bullshit.

    you know whats bullshit

    280 man

    for a fucking pit that can bomb the shit out of me in my own base at the beginning of a game.

  • this marder kicks ass

  • yeah that was fair

    marder(REPAIRING) sherman(no repairs)

  • dude thats retarded crap fucking mardar was getting repaired like shit!

  • marders wins yeah! shermans are crap

  • he was getting fixed thats stupid

  • is this opposing fronts?

  • the marder is a antitank tank so is cleary

  • that wasnt a fair fight. marder was being repaired while fighting but sherman wasnt.

  • That open hatch is just begging for a Molotov Cocktail.

  • lol the marder I has got 75 mm canon

  • lol noob

    marder is a troup tank with a 35mm canon -.-

    shermin have been more -.-

  • no the marder has a 75mm gun

  • sherman started out with a 37mm, and ended up with a 76mm

  • but marder have 35mm?!

    the TIGER 1 of ww2 has 88mm ;)

  • he should have got an m10 and circled it....

  • you can circle a Marder with a m8

  • Well..... Not exactly a marder vs a sherman because you were repairing the thing with panzer grenadier squads. You should have made it a fair fight lol. Anyway panzer elite are alright faction, Most people online just spam shreks and hetzers so it takes the fun out of the strategy behind that faction. Good game overall however COH is amazing game :D

  • the marder was repair in the battle vs the sherman,in that way,the victory,sure belong to the axis tank

  • lol mit reparieren kann ja jeder ^^

  • dont like its un fair because the German had engineer LOLB

  • wih are the germans soldiers white?

  • the marder had panzer greinders repairs it ive done this before and for me the sherman won.the sherman lost because it probally didn't have the 87mm upgrade plus the marder has more fire power overall you shouldn't approach something that has the words anti, killer,and hunter in it.YOULL LOSE

  • marder 3 is best tank of pe(panzer elit) before i hear some people said "Pe can get panther and jagpanther" i said marder 3 with the last upgrade cost only 40 of fuel and about 300 of hp(humain point sorry for my bad english)for his powrful canon and he got one best range in all ger army call 2 panther cost 1000 of hp!!!

  • marder would win.. its like an AT tank, if you tried to flank the marder the marder would 1 shot you in the side before you could even get behind it.. the infantry can use at nades or whatever the germans call it

  • What a waste Sherman could have easily won if it put its rotating turret into good use. It's there for a reason: to circle around Marder which does not have a rotating turret and have to rotate its whole chassis as such can't catch up and return fire.

  • But in that range, all the marder would have to do is rotate it's vehicle. And dont give me some excuse like "the sherman could've disabled the Marder's tracks" because that means the marder could've / would've already done the same thing to the Sherman

    -.-

  • My point would be moot if you thinks that the Marder actually turns faster than the Sherman would circling around it. If Marder could win a Sherman that's encircling it, then why there's a need for rotating turret in the first place? Think about it. Micro-circling is what makes the Sherman gain an upper hand, not face to face brawling.

  • ookay.....i didnt quite fully understand your english...

    P.S. the purpose of a rotating turret on the sherman is so that the sherman would not have to rotate on it's chassis, but the turret only moves 360 degrees on a fixed point. Also, why did you involve the rotating turret in this? like i said earlier, the rotating turret is put on a fixed point on the tank, and can only ROTATE, which doesnt help you when you're trying to reach different sides of the tank, unless you move the actual tank.

  • the marder activated "rapid fire" that's one thing,second,where hell should the sherman have gone so that it flank the marder...third,you idiot...look at the distance between the two,the marder IN THIS SITUATION would out-turn the sherman...I hate people like you..

  • Close up the distance and micro-circle around the rapid-fire activated marder. Deactivation takes time and the turretless marder will not be able to hit sherman. Turning IS a problem for the marder. Sherman don't have to turn its chassis to fire. Don't hate me or people who thinks out of the box. I don't hate inflexible people, you know.

    Don't get it? Watch the video "Shermans vs Stugs", similar concept. Duh.

  • Sure, stugs are similar in concept, but I'm not going to lie... StuGs suck. If the Wehr player wants a form of anti-tank, it'd just be better off getting Grenadiers with Shrecks. The fuel can go to a better vehicle.

  • also the sherman was stupid exposing his flank T_T

  • thats cuz it looked like the shermans was turning to try and flank the marder xD

  • well maybe since there are 30 guys repairing the tank, it may survive

    but overall it would survive with out repairs when in that hold ground stance thing

    and when the sherman is not moving

  • king tiger ftw

  • Sutpid pit point system for losers...

  • well the sherman guys a total noob, he should have charged that marder and could have ran over every single guy repairing that thing or force moved so u werent, the micro around it and....marders gone

  • well i would call this video sherman vs marder + pg squads repairing it.

  • lol so true mate

  • No matter what I call the video, there's no way I can force myself to leave a marder unsupported.

  • Yeah. Hence I would use them only as support vehicles. I would use my Panzer IV tank to defend the shots and kill off the soldiers and use the Marder to finish off the armoured vehicles.

  • Its easy to earn resources. Its hard to maintain the area that generate your resources. Yeah. Panther is really a killer. But i prefer to have a Marder tho. Mobile and agile and powerful enough to kill. :P

  • Haha. Yeah i meant that as well, pop cap, munitions, fuel manpower, etc. Haha Thanks anw

  • Marder is a great tank. I once destroyed 20 M10's with only 3 Marders. But it has a weak armor (even when faced frontal) so always' keep it safe and some granadiers to repair it.

  • the germans have all the cool stuff :P

  • I agreed. This tank together with the Panther (both of which can be built in unlimited quantities in the game provided that it has alot of manpower etc.) is extremely devastating to allied units. But i love the Hummel most. It can destroy 1 buildings with just 2-3 shots. Not even the allied artillery in the game can match this accuracy and power!

  • okay, u had ur mIII ability enabled and millions of pioneers repairing you...... So thats a fair fight right? xD

  • I'm not going to send in a Marder all alone... That'd be silly :P

  • rofl . xD

  • little bit of micro would ahve dominated that marder. the absence of the repair people would have helped too

  • Maybe. The same thing can be said for the Marder though.

  • yeah but the point is that the marder cant match the speed of the sherman, and would have been easily flanked, since it also doesnt have a moving turret. not saying the marder is a bad tank, its not, but i just hate watching people let their tanks sit their and grind it out. german tanks would win everytime.

  • Hmmmm... How did the Marder III TANK HUNTER win? Hmmmmmm

  • owned

  • Sherman will win in 1v1 battle.

  • Yes with flanking..

  • you have tons of peaple repairing the marder

  • Marders have a great rate of fire once they are locked down. That and the fact that the Marder is 8 against tanks in this game is why you can rip through Shermans.

  • marder is way to easely countered even a stuart or m8 can kill it by just driving around it.