Stossel is great. There is one more scam he should investigate - the whole seduction community.
There is not even 1 (one) scientific study confirming the ideas some guys who call themselves pick-up artists spread. But they still make big buck selling that nonsense and even mainstream media bought it!
Something tells me that O'Reilly doesn't know that Harry Markopoulos had been writing the SEC about a fraud named Bernie Madoff for 9 years before they did anything.
I don't understand why O'Reilly has the 8 o'clock (the most important) timeslot, honestly. Good thing the Judge is on at the same time so I have someone intelligent to watch.
On that note, Stossel is an amazing factual debater.
@thecomputergurukid yeah, no... I m gonna start a bank, and spend as much money as i want... but... u cant let my bank fail?! it ll cause a depression... BU HU
John Stossel needs to replace Glenn Beck. He's a true libertarian. He is out to inform and persuade, and he never tries to get involved in partisan bickering. Glenn Beck pretends to be a libertarian but all he cares about are ratings and fear mongering.
The best libertarian at raping people in arguments was Milton Friedman. He could take down any liberal or conservative an in argument with just Logic and Factual information. Its impossible to win against Milton Friedman because he argues like a true scientist, if you disagree with him your arguing against theories and laws.
hey and a year later what happend the bail out came and we are still in a recession .. but wait the bankers got trillions ... so they made out ok ... plus thebillions the have gone un acounted for ..... so the only people that got ffffff over wus us the lower class and middle class .
Land of the free, home of the BRAVE. Stossel isn't afraid of any recession, depression, whatever. We shouldn't be either because America has gotten through it before DESPITE fdr. We should fear the huge federal government because they'll screw it all up... red or blue.
History has proved O'Reilly right on one point. Stossel asks what will prevent the banks from making bad loans in the future. As of this date, people like Donald Trump (sorry, he's the best I could do off the top of my head) say the banks are tight fisted and not loaning to anybody. They seem determined to try and lower the amount of leverage they have. Also, in my opinion, most businesses know that if they ask for a government loan during a recession, they get it, not in a recovery.
@ drmodestoesq - i think banks should be tight fisted. They have a duty to their shareholders and members to be successful and recoop what the they lent out. History has shown us that people that pay their bills on time, have sensible spending habits and save instead or charge can repay those debts. What is happening is the gov't is forcing banks to lend money to the folks that normally wouldn't get approved; those are the same that default. BANG housing lending market turns upside down.
to hell with O'Reilly, if Stossel was as assertive on his beliefs as Bill is, it would be called the Stossel Factor. I think he can be, but he really needs to start showing it to get himself some ground in the libertarian side of things in the media.
Both bail outs were completely idiotic. It would have been more beneficial to put that money in the companies that weren't going bankrupt, or into new companies. It's like what, 16,000$ in spending for every American... imagine if they'd just bailed out the people, so they could pay off their debts, which would take that burden off companies, and that would have freed up a lot of capital for these companies. And any leftovers would stimulate the economy. That's how the bail out shoulda gone
You can say that now, but Bush's bailout was accepted as God's word by most conservatives. But when Obama did it, most conservatives flip flopped on the issue, and liberals too. It would be more accurate to say Bill O'Reilly is a Republican, because he'll blindly support the party on all majority positions, and oppose the Democrats on their key positions.
I completely disagree with you on your point. Most conservatives were AGAINST the bailout, hence why Republicans are losing more and more support from conservatives.
I personally have been consistent in my criticism on this bailout by attacking both Bush and Obama. This is a true example of the lack of difference between Republicans and Democrats.
"I would argue that nobody knew what was happening. Everybody was too busy buying things." Then you should spend less time commenting on YouTube videos and more time looking into the economist Peter Schiff, as well as MANY other Austrian Economists. But oh well, the lies of 1) no one saw this coming (to make the market seem unstable and scary) and 2) that it was too LITTLE regulation to blame will continue to prosper. It's easier to understand a dumb lie than a correct opinion which isnt slick
Bill is a fookin mongoloid. He defends and denounces the concept of property rights from one sentence to the next.
It doesn't get any stupider than Bill defending the bailout. Stossel has towering intellect and integrity --Bill has a bunch of bad brainwashing. For a further intellectual revelation (somewhat heavy reading) read Hayek's "Why I am not a conservative". That's all I have to say about bloviating blowhard Bill-O.
Austrian economists have been warning about this for years, but the monopoly men of the government didn't care, they wanted the market to crash. Now they want to pose as saviors while they continue to ignore sound austrian economic advice and theory.
Billo made the logical mistake of assuming there are only two choices, e.g. pass the bailout *or* do nothing (and "watch it fall"). There are a host of things the government can do that would help such as reducing regulation (mark to market comes to mind) reduce spending (withdrawing from Iraq is one way) but printing money by the dump truckload and pouring it down rat-holes only helps those at the bottom of the rat-holes, not the general economy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
O'Reilly is interviewing the wrong guy! Stossel does great work but he is no economist and clearly does not understand the problems of ouor economy. Interview Peter Schiff or Jim Rogers!
I agree. O'Reilly doesn't understand the economy. But he is supposed to be the journalist doing an interview. At least he should interview someone who saw these problems coming.
You're probably right about O'Reilly. He thinks he knows everything and if we just listen to him the world will be a better place.
P.S. There are a number of people that forecasted this economic collapse years ago. The average American was in the mall running up his credit card debt but guys like Peter Schiff and Jim Rogers saw this coming. There are plenty of youtube clips from 2006 that show their predictions.
That doesn't make him an economist. He's a journalist that understands certain ideas about economics. He understands how gov't interference will distort an economy and do more harm. But from what I've heard he doesn't understand the fundamental problems of our economy.
I dont know if I agree with Stossel not understanding the fundamentals of the economy but for the sake of argument i'll agree. What I really respect about him is that he has had some of the heavy hitters of economics like Milton Friedman come on and talk about economics. These are the guys we should be listening to
I'm not a big fan of Milton Friedman since he is a monetarist. I've seen some recent Stossel work and interviews and I think he is gaining more understanding. Stossel has been on Fox's Freedom Watch with Peter Schiff and other real economists so I think he is learning a lot more.
The thing about this bail out that bugs me is the people responsible (US Gov forcing loans) are the very people we are now trusting to get us out of this. Government will not reform the policy of forcing loans, they will blame wall street and the free market for this crisis. They will use this to take more of our freedoms and put more restrictions on the free market. Maybe it is time we tear it all down and start over or at least go back to a very limited government like the constitution says.
Once again, O'Reilly was proven dead wrong. Everything he said was wrong here. Not only are we headed downhill here, but the bailout bill he suupports has hurt foreign economies tied to us.
How is short-term thinking and a lack of adhearance to free market principles going to solve a crisis instigated by short-term thinking and a lack of adhearance to free market principles?
O'Reilly is such a sophist and a partisan. His verbiage boils down to, bascially, a demand for a magical leveling of all information, available to anyone at any time. This is not, and never will be, possible. In fact, it is disparities in information which makes the market move!
Another point: How is creating $800B out of thin air going to shore up anything?
In our State 60% are against the bail out! Since 80% -90% of government is Democraps. Is this a dirty trick of Obama to make the Rep look bad because the Pres is Rep. to swing the election. Most of the people supporting Obama can cause this to happen. PS The people bailed out are Obama, Hillary and Democraps. Stossel had his say!
All this AND Pink floyd's Money?
Niiiiiiiiice.
theyeti101101 2 months ago
Stossel is great. There is one more scam he should investigate - the whole seduction community.
There is not even 1 (one) scientific study confirming the ideas some guys who call themselves pick-up artists spread. But they still make big buck selling that nonsense and even mainstream media bought it!
Read more on SeductionMyth com
SeductionMyth 3 months ago
" Crisis is the friend of the state" More power, more money to it and its cohorts, less freedom and money to us. Sounds about right.
2100v 7 months ago 3
Government regulators are too busy downloading porn to oversee companies.
2100v 7 months ago
Something tells me that O'Reilly doesn't know that Harry Markopoulos had been writing the SEC about a fraud named Bernie Madoff for 9 years before they did anything.
Goodatconnect4 9 months ago
I don't understand why O'Reilly has the 8 o'clock (the most important) timeslot, honestly. Good thing the Judge is on at the same time so I have someone intelligent to watch.
On that note, Stossel is an amazing factual debater.
ZerogunRivale 10 months ago
I'd like someone to respond: Why not bail out the people who were given bad mortgages and let these companies go under?
halvor311 11 months ago
capitalism =profit and LOSS. end of debate
mumuchu99 1 year ago 3
john stossel was slapped in the face by a wrestler. he got owned
YuberSepiroth 1 year ago
@YuberSepiroth
LOL, I didn't realize that was John Stossel, I just looked it up and it was him! He was young back then. XD, that was almost 30 years ago.
IndividualParties 10 months ago
People like John Stossel caused the Great Depression. You can't just let banks fail, you get a depression doing that.
thecomputergurukid 1 year ago
@thecomputergurukid Bank failures did not cause the Depresssion. Know your facts, sir.
GoingGoingGalt 1 year ago
@thecomputergurukid yeah, no... I m gonna start a bank, and spend as much money as i want... but... u cant let my bank fail?! it ll cause a depression... BU HU
Wolky702 1 year ago
lol wow billo kept pretty level headed here, thought he was gonna pop any second
ImEuanAndIGotsSkeelz 1 year ago
John Stossel needs to replace Glenn Beck. He's a true libertarian. He is out to inform and persuade, and he never tries to get involved in partisan bickering. Glenn Beck pretends to be a libertarian but all he cares about are ratings and fear mongering.
13lackLight 1 year ago 2
The best libertarian at raping people in arguments was Milton Friedman. He could take down any liberal or conservative an in argument with just Logic and Factual information. Its impossible to win against Milton Friedman because he argues like a true scientist, if you disagree with him your arguing against theories and laws.
nagasnharpes 1 year ago
@nagasnharpes
Yes, and not only that, he did it with a smile. Not only did you get exposed for being wrong, you looked like a jerk compared to him.
EGarrett01 11 months ago
bill o'reilly is a worhless speaker taking up my oxygen. he should just shut up. mass media cullings should be imminent
kroovyandcal 1 year ago
Stossel speaks and thinks like a true American should.
FantomShadowz 1 year ago 3
hey and a year later what happend the bail out came and we are still in a recession .. but wait the bankers got trillions ... so they made out ok ... plus thebillions the have gone un acounted for ..... so the only people that got ffffff over wus us the lower class and middle class .
al8397138 1 year ago
@al8397138 thank you exactly
K5GIXX 1 year ago
Deich, Water, Panic, the only option we have, shore it up...words with no meaning...reflects incompetence on basically every level...
manoman0 1 year ago
Oreilly once again has shown that he has no principles.
truevoice08 1 year ago 2
Stossel always give Oreilly the "what the hell are you looking at me for?" look
Melville10 2 years ago
Land of the free, home of the BRAVE. Stossel isn't afraid of any recession, depression, whatever. We shouldn't be either because America has gotten through it before DESPITE fdr. We should fear the huge federal government because they'll screw it all up... red or blue.
benmaloney1 2 years ago
History has proved O'Reilly right on one point. Stossel asks what will prevent the banks from making bad loans in the future. As of this date, people like Donald Trump (sorry, he's the best I could do off the top of my head) say the banks are tight fisted and not loaning to anybody. They seem determined to try and lower the amount of leverage they have. Also, in my opinion, most businesses know that if they ask for a government loan during a recession, they get it, not in a recovery.
drmodestoesq 2 years ago
@ drmodestoesq - i think banks should be tight fisted. They have a duty to their shareholders and members to be successful and recoop what the they lent out. History has shown us that people that pay their bills on time, have sensible spending habits and save instead or charge can repay those debts. What is happening is the gov't is forcing banks to lend money to the folks that normally wouldn't get approved; those are the same that default. BANG housing lending market turns upside down.
curryay 1 year ago
O'reilly = propaganda. Stossel = honest, logical reporting on important issues.
jgrimsl1 2 years ago
"but with cocks ahead of the FCC" hahaah
kingincrimson 2 years ago
to hell with O'Reilly, if Stossel was as assertive on his beliefs as Bill is, it would be called the Stossel Factor. I think he can be, but he really needs to start showing it to get himself some ground in the libertarian side of things in the media.
wachman 2 years ago 2
Stossel!!!!!
Ditch ABC and come over to FOX News!!!
Your a libertarian working for a hard left wing media.
TheLiberalssuckdick 2 years ago
he did :D
MindCBase 2 years ago
yeah, i know.
TheLiberalssuckdick 2 years ago
o'reily is a dunce
nexus411 2 years ago 2
Never debate Stossel, you will get fucking raped
fluff125 2 years ago 39
Wow, stossel is awesome.... so calm and assertive...
NoUseForAName06 2 years ago 6
Moderate rights (Oreily) vs libertarian (Stossel). In hind sight the libertarian side was right. Like usual.
UncommonThinker 2 years ago 6
Indeed.
TimeWarp66 2 years ago
It's never wrong to choose liberty.
funktroop3r 2 years ago
Both bail outs were completely idiotic. It would have been more beneficial to put that money in the companies that weren't going bankrupt, or into new companies. It's like what, 16,000$ in spending for every American... imagine if they'd just bailed out the people, so they could pay off their debts, which would take that burden off companies, and that would have freed up a lot of capital for these companies. And any leftovers would stimulate the economy. That's how the bail out shoulda gone
bbg5000 2 years ago 5
Well sure, people already paid those taxes, they just would get refunded, it's not socialism.
timetraveler3797 2 years ago
Stossel is the bommmbbbb
rescuemay 2 years ago 27
conservative vs liberal i think
americadashi 2 years ago
technically, a conservative (O'reily) vs a libertarian (Stossel). But O'Reily isn't a true conservative if he's supporting the bail out.
superdinoyoshi 2 years ago 6
i accept your statement
americadashi 2 years ago 2
You can say that now, but Bush's bailout was accepted as God's word by most conservatives. But when Obama did it, most conservatives flip flopped on the issue, and liberals too. It would be more accurate to say Bill O'Reilly is a Republican, because he'll blindly support the party on all majority positions, and oppose the Democrats on their key positions.
bbg5000 2 years ago
Bill O'Reilly is a fake Republican aka neocon
DyeTyme 2 years ago
I completely disagree with you on your point. Most conservatives were AGAINST the bailout, hence why Republicans are losing more and more support from conservatives.
I personally have been consistent in my criticism on this bailout by attacking both Bush and Obama. This is a true example of the lack of difference between Republicans and Democrats.
mrblujet 2 years ago 2
mrblujet, that's why we Libertarians call them all "Republicrats."
BRYAN351 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Free Market Free Market Blah Blah Blah.
Cypressmyst 2 years ago
dont let a crisis go to waste
ForTehNguyen 2 years ago
"I would argue that nobody knew what was happening. Everybody was too busy buying things." Then you should spend less time commenting on YouTube videos and more time looking into the economist Peter Schiff, as well as MANY other Austrian Economists. But oh well, the lies of 1) no one saw this coming (to make the market seem unstable and scary) and 2) that it was too LITTLE regulation to blame will continue to prosper. It's easier to understand a dumb lie than a correct opinion which isnt slick
ronrutherford 2 years ago
Bill is a fookin mongoloid. He defends and denounces the concept of property rights from one sentence to the next.
It doesn't get any stupider than Bill defending the bailout. Stossel has towering intellect and integrity --Bill has a bunch of bad brainwashing. For a further intellectual revelation (somewhat heavy reading) read Hayek's "Why I am not a conservative". That's all I have to say about bloviating blowhard Bill-O.
Vote Libertarian!
libertarianjury 2 years ago 4
I second that opinion!
cherryblossom39 2 years ago
Austrian economists have been warning about this for years, but the monopoly men of the government didn't care, they wanted the market to crash. Now they want to pose as saviors while they continue to ignore sound austrian economic advice and theory.
CorrosionX3 2 years ago 3
Larry Elder is right: O'Reilly is a populist.
phattonez 2 years ago 3
Obama is showing he cannot think on his feet and cannot speak extemporaneously off the cuff. he is apparently a little ignorant about the economy.
crawfishpolecat 2 years ago
BO : "...but the dike is breaking, alright? Don't you have to stop the water, and then make the dike stronger?"
This is why we have both environmental AND economic disasters - because statists, like O'Reilly think they understand, and act in ignorance.
When a dike breaks, millions of gallons of water rushing at you, is THAT the best time to go over to PATCH THE LEAK? Hell no!
Time is PASSED for this. The answer is - GET OUT OF THE WAY!! Help people, allow the system to equilibrate.
kidShaman 2 years ago
Stossel = the absolute best of the best.
luckyvet 2 years ago 4
"Gov't can't even count the votes correctly"
Brilliant
Juanmag84 3 years ago 10
Amen
drhoffma 2 years ago
The "Stos" with another great quote and Fact
sillyjipsy 2 years ago
Billo made the logical mistake of assuming there are only two choices, e.g. pass the bailout *or* do nothing (and "watch it fall"). There are a host of things the government can do that would help such as reducing regulation (mark to market comes to mind) reduce spending (withdrawing from Iraq is one way) but printing money by the dump truckload and pouring it down rat-holes only helps those at the bottom of the rat-holes, not the general economy.
Bustafunny 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
O'Reilly is interviewing the wrong guy! Stossel does great work but he is no economist and clearly does not understand the problems of ouor economy. Interview Peter Schiff or Jim Rogers!
jsyc07 3 years ago
And O'Reily is an economist? He does not have a clue when it comes to the economy.
vaughn8113 3 years ago 4
I agree. O'Reilly doesn't understand the economy. But he is supposed to be the journalist doing an interview. At least he should interview someone who saw these problems coming.
jsyc07 3 years ago
Well, maybe O'Reily want to be a hero and solve all of our problems.
P.S. I would argue that nobody knew what was happening. Everybody was too busy buying things.
vaughn8113 3 years ago
You're probably right about O'Reilly. He thinks he knows everything and if we just listen to him the world will be a better place.
P.S. There are a number of people that forecasted this economic collapse years ago. The average American was in the mall running up his credit card debt but guys like Peter Schiff and Jim Rogers saw this coming. There are plenty of youtube clips from 2006 that show their predictions.
jsyc07 3 years ago
Stossel isn't an economist?
So much for ALL his videos on economic topics...
wolfborn10 2 years ago
That doesn't make him an economist. He's a journalist that understands certain ideas about economics. He understands how gov't interference will distort an economy and do more harm. But from what I've heard he doesn't understand the fundamental problems of our economy.
jsyc07 2 years ago
I dont know if I agree with Stossel not understanding the fundamentals of the economy but for the sake of argument i'll agree. What I really respect about him is that he has had some of the heavy hitters of economics like Milton Friedman come on and talk about economics. These are the guys we should be listening to
soxfan0408 2 years ago
I'm not a big fan of Milton Friedman since he is a monetarist. I've seen some recent Stossel work and interviews and I think he is gaining more understanding. Stossel has been on Fox's Freedom Watch with Peter Schiff and other real economists so I think he is learning a lot more.
jsyc07 2 years ago
im on cam and bored
i liked this video :) uZ
DONTtell1 3 years ago
The thing about this bail out that bugs me is the people responsible (US Gov forcing loans) are the very people we are now trusting to get us out of this. Government will not reform the policy of forcing loans, they will blame wall street and the free market for this crisis. They will use this to take more of our freedoms and put more restrictions on the free market. Maybe it is time we tear it all down and start over or at least go back to a very limited government like the constitution says.
WSOR4025 3 years ago
John Stassi
bahramf 3 years ago
stossel is the shit! badass last word!
redrajani 3 years ago 4
John Stossel is my new hero.
ModernSurvivor 3 years ago 8
John Stossel = Honorable truthful man
Oreilly = actor / neocon
chrisvet1 3 years ago 4
You think O Reilly only ACTS like a neocon?
:D
stealthswimmer 3 years ago
it's steven colbert in a o reilly suit
myiqisinfinity 3 years ago
I don't know who the Stossel guy is but I agreed with what he said, I just wish he had a little more time.
FSM2786 3 years ago 7
oh my gowd how could you not know who john stossel is?
ab1tchslap 3 years ago
Once again, O'Reilly was proven dead wrong. Everything he said was wrong here. Not only are we headed downhill here, but the bailout bill he suupports has hurt foreign economies tied to us.
What an idiot.
FreeFragSGS 3 years ago
I now understand why O'Reilly is such an idiot. He never shuts up. If he'd clamp his yapper for a few minutes he might learn something.
mwbrady68 3 years ago
How is short-term thinking and a lack of adhearance to free market principles going to solve a crisis instigated by short-term thinking and a lack of adhearance to free market principles?
grantsinmypants2 3 years ago 4
O'Reilly is such a sophist and a partisan. His verbiage boils down to, bascially, a demand for a magical leveling of all information, available to anyone at any time. This is not, and never will be, possible. In fact, it is disparities in information which makes the market move!
Another point: How is creating $800B out of thin air going to shore up anything?
grantsinmypants2 3 years ago
In our State 60% are against the bail out! Since 80% -90% of government is Democraps. Is this a dirty trick of Obama to make the Rep look bad because the Pres is Rep. to swing the election. Most of the people supporting Obama can cause this to happen. PS The people bailed out are Obama, Hillary and Democraps. Stossel had his say!
Dallouez 3 years ago
I appreciate O'reilly but I wish he let Stossel speak more - he has great insight on things.
Tidoublemy 3 years ago
You appreciate O'reilly? He's literally wrong on EVERY issue.
audioX1 3 years ago 2
How?
zacideamus 3 years ago