Why people always keep calling simulators as arcade games?A software does not bring reality,so all games are playable(and can be called simulators),even if u dislike.I love F-22 Raptor,F-22 Lightning 2 & 3,F-22 ADF,F-16 Multirole Fighter,A-10 Cuba,F/A 18 Hornet 3D,etc.,and I dont know why some reviews keep saying that some games do not offer us real simulation.A game is just to entertain,not to be real.Games will never be like the real fligth experience inside the real aircraft.
@kerdougan It's not all about graphics, or how intricately detailed a sim is in my opinion. You have to strike a balance. Hated falcon 4.0 because it was TOO accurate. Don't like games like Crimson Skies as they're too arcadey and simplified. It's all about balance. F22 ADF / TAW, DI iF16 Fighting Falcon, Comanche Gold (i know it's a bit arcadey), IL-2 Sturmovik 1946, there are possibly more that I have forgotten. These games (to me) strike the magic balance of graphics / playability/ challenge.
@MrMoorkey: Well, it depends on what you are looking after. I'm looking after simulators, you're looking after games. And betwwen those two types there is a huge difference. Now the tendency is to release more and more hardcore simulators, BMS and DCS A-10C are good examples. But you still can have fun with IL2 Cliffs of Dover and Rise of Flight because there is not too much avionics.
@kerdougan True that... I probably just suck (and haven't the patience for) hard-core sims. I just can't stand simplified dross that passes for 'sims' these days. I do dabble with hardcore sims, though one of two things happen... either frustrated turning off fo computer, or days of absorbed gaming. I usually just like to dive in with an appreciable amount of realism, but without the four hundred plus key commands.
@MrMoorkey: The key to really appreciate simulators is hardware. Programmable HOTAS, Track-Ir, rudder, once you have this stuff everything becomes much more natural and it makes things easier. But it has a cost. The best way to learn how to deal with those simulators is to get involved into a virtual squadron, it's much more fun and you can make multiplayer flights and missions.
Hmm weeks and weeks i played this game.
Silver4079 1 week ago
EF2000 was better ;-)
growtogether 3 months ago
@growtogether I loved them both.
headdownharris 2 months ago
donde lo descargo pagina ?
84sakurachan 3 months ago
i loved this game
NKCdaniel 4 months ago
Why people always keep calling simulators as arcade games?A software does not bring reality,so all games are playable(and can be called simulators),even if u dislike.I love F-22 Raptor,F-22 Lightning 2 & 3,F-22 ADF,F-16 Multirole Fighter,A-10 Cuba,F/A 18 Hornet 3D,etc.,and I dont know why some reviews keep saying that some games do not offer us real simulation.A game is just to entertain,not to be real.Games will never be like the real fligth experience inside the real aircraft.
eltondjm 6 months ago
Oy my god, have you even tried Open Falcon, BMS, IL2 or Rise of Flight before saying a such thing? ADF looks like an arcade game now.
kerdougan 6 months ago
@kerdougan It's not all about graphics, or how intricately detailed a sim is in my opinion. You have to strike a balance. Hated falcon 4.0 because it was TOO accurate. Don't like games like Crimson Skies as they're too arcadey and simplified. It's all about balance. F22 ADF / TAW, DI iF16 Fighting Falcon, Comanche Gold (i know it's a bit arcadey), IL-2 Sturmovik 1946, there are possibly more that I have forgotten. These games (to me) strike the magic balance of graphics / playability/ challenge.
MrMoorkey 5 months ago
@MrMoorkey: Well, it depends on what you are looking after. I'm looking after simulators, you're looking after games. And betwwen those two types there is a huge difference. Now the tendency is to release more and more hardcore simulators, BMS and DCS A-10C are good examples. But you still can have fun with IL2 Cliffs of Dover and Rise of Flight because there is not too much avionics.
kerdougan 5 months ago
@kerdougan True that... I probably just suck (and haven't the patience for) hard-core sims. I just can't stand simplified dross that passes for 'sims' these days. I do dabble with hardcore sims, though one of two things happen... either frustrated turning off fo computer, or days of absorbed gaming. I usually just like to dive in with an appreciable amount of realism, but without the four hundred plus key commands.
MrMoorkey 5 months ago
@MrMoorkey: The key to really appreciate simulators is hardware. Programmable HOTAS, Track-Ir, rudder, once you have this stuff everything becomes much more natural and it makes things easier. But it has a cost. The best way to learn how to deal with those simulators is to get involved into a virtual squadron, it's much more fun and you can make multiplayer flights and missions.
kerdougan 5 months ago
multiplayer isteyen varmı ?
boorock14 7 months ago
yes ADF was also my first sim. loved it.
gneyra 1 year ago
...this was a great game...
dionysiussmith 1 year ago
It takes you that long to take down a Mig 27?
killajakez 1 year ago
Dude can you upload a clip of the intro music of this game, i need it so bad. It haunts me. But I dont have the game anymore.
a1exgerman 2 years ago 2