THE BAD GUYS are the USA and G8 and dark FORCES which are always planning to destroy the Van Ellen Belt, to get our, and also to destroy Mankind with WARS, and LIES
there you go again the american people do not need to no what happen to the shuttle stop letting them treat you as children you pay taxes you fight in wars you die in wars but you dont need to no the truth but you can be told a big fat lie and thats alright wake up america wake up before its to late. see you on the other side
Talk about building your straw man to knock it down later by this conspiracy peddler. Lighting strike, a NASA investigator did suggest that maybe lighting struck the shuttle before launch but strike affects electronic equipment & it is a known fact the shuttles & earlier rockets have been struck by lighting on their launching pads.
But the lighting strike was shot down since Columbia suffered structural damage on a tile, not by lighting strike
finally he said it, "like a cork screw & scraggly" bolt of what appeared to be lightening. It goes by the shuttle & as if 2 "lock onto the shuttle" changes direction & makes a direct hit~This is wat I read when the first pic's & statement came out rite aftr the shuttle was "blown up"~If U look at the video of the rocket w/the nuclear warhead that was on it's way to the moon a UFO hits it with a "direct beam" of lite & does this 3 times~Not in cork screw/scraggly manner~ CAN NE1 SAY HAARP/SCALAR!
@OverlordShamala actually I don't really care about any of this any more. Thankfully I have learned that I need to pull my head out of this crap along w/so called 2012 which is equal to Y2K. i've learned who the true enemy is...which is Britain. All this crap that is going on stems from them. They've done a great job shifting focus from them onto russia, germany, china, etc. Best Gift we can give ourselves is to ignore all this ufo & 2012 b.s. I wish you much success & peace. Best of Wishes
That would be about the only way Secretly you could test such a weapon. I don't think Russia/China would like real missile launches much less a successful shoot down because the arms race would be on then!!! Around the time Vladimir Putin was shitting his pants about Our nuclear defense plans and accused the USA of secret agendas that could provoke another Arms Race. Star wars designed for NO Nukes or UFO'S or both. So Space Shuttles are perfect target practice, Space Ship riding a ICBM.
Maybe we shot it down? When kings were buried they would some times kill all grave diggers to keep the tomb location secret. If there was some kind of top secret duty while in space, the Astronauts wouldn't have been briefed until their destination. What about Regan's star wars? Very shortly after Korea Lunched those so called defective missiles NASA scheduled 30+missions to space in just a few years, Who funded that? Maybe star wars was an early costly experiment until "HEY IT WORK'S" Bush!!!
hes got to come to alberta to see are lighting here. it paules 8 to 9 times befor it disappears lasting way longer then 5 shot on a still camera. hmmm was the shuttle columbia the one that went out in to the vanellen belt and got a dose of radiation when they did a wide flip around the space staion. that it might have did more then just made the crue see lights floating just a thought
It's obvious they've been watching and what ever experiment or ritual was performed onboard the shuttle greatly offended the gods of above and they destroyed the offending hand and at the same time spoke clearly to those members of the Order of Columbia.
he's is right and the reason i say that is because i got one of those pic's and i'm not joking guy's. i always wanted to upload it but i dont know should i. i dont have the rights because it's not mine but also could coase some truoble. but what he said in this video is true. it might not be ufo but whatever it was it didnt miss the shuttle.
Is there anyway you could sent me a copy to my YOUTUBE account? I also had a copy buy it mysteriously disappeared when I took my computer to get fixed. Please think about it.
if it was shot down by a UFO it would explain why NASA was very insistant that people do not come in contact with the debrits though they did anyway...
NASA figured out and Goldie concurred that Columbia was already in frame. And because he had to push the release on the camera (no cable release) the bright orbiter left a squiggly purplish line before the camera settled to motionless. The reason you see a dimmer, straight trail on the left side is because the shuttle's trail is persistant. A lesson if you're going to take long exposures of a reentering shuttle, use a cable release and open shutter before shuttle is in frame. ..no jiggle!
Look up Moon mining Anti gravity John Hodge Bases on Moon and Mars. I am guessing that the Astronauts were safely beamed out of the shuttle onto a UFO to be taken for more work on Moon or Mars, the shuttle shot down was just to prevent investigations.
1. Photographing a object moving at 17,000 mph with a 35 mm camera and a telephoto lens on a tripod is very hard to do.
2. The frame 2:42 of the photo you show and report the shuttle to be the "green streak" dose not vaguely resemble the shuttle. It could be anything.
3. The frame 3:15 you report the "plasma particle weapon" to hit the shuttle. The debris flow is moving along with the shuttle. If the anything hit the shuttle
would at least some of the debris explode out and be left in a trail????
4. I believe in ETs and I believe we have shot at ETs before. I also believe they have returned fire after they have been fired upon. But I have never seen any other reports where ET started an engagement.
5. Why would they shoot down the shuttle on the way home instead of going into space? We have been in space a long time for the ETs to become territorial at this late date. Conclusion: hoax or wrong ID
Thanks for your reply. But what I said in 5 is still valid. 5. Why would they shoot down the shuttle on the way home instead of going into space? We have been in space a long time for the ETs to become territorial at this late date.
I don't think so. If I was posting a warning to a neighbor. I would have made an example of what not to do by stopping his unwanted act at the beginning. ie.. They would have shot down Friendship 7 and made the Mercury program a complete failure instead of a fairly successful program.
... the ground atop a tripod. I just don't think its feasable. But its only an opinion and everyone is entitled to theirs. I do believe there are other forms of life in the area of the universe we are located in, and I do think Governments are keeping secrets, but I dont think the shuttle was shot down by any human made weapon.. I welcome intelligent responses. peace..
One thing bothers me. The guy who took the photos was using an ordinary 35mm SLR right?
The shuttle was How High?
Doing what speed?
I studied photography, I did motosport journalism for my final major. Ever tried to follow a racing car doing 150mph around a track with a telephoto lens? Its bloody hard. A shuttle doing in excess of 12,000 miles an hour?!?! Plus what size was the lens? I have a 1000ml laser stabilised Canon lens. I cannot see how these pics could have been taken from...
Yet again loads of ppl are moaning about the photos not being shown... well you don't look far. The main one is on the Exopolitics UK site as I've said before and linked to.
I have no problem with disbelievers as I saw UFOs in 1972 & have always accepted that if someone had told me a story like my own & I hadn't seen them for myself I would think they were either nuts or well intentioned but mistaken.
I keep an open mind on this theory. Thereagain, after what I witnessed in 1972, I am bound to.
I look forward to further disclosure on this one.
Thank you for posting it. Your efforts are appreciated & not in vain.
WHY are you all so sure of yourselves about something you have absolutly no idea about? Is it that hard to comprehend that your government would keep secrets from you? History says no. In our entire universe is it more likly or not that we are the only living beings?
Well said. The fact the pictures aren`t allowed to be shown publically...is all the evidence you need.David never shows us the pics `cause he`d go to prison...or worse!
It is inevitable that the people saying they need the pictures in order to believe, would find some way of discrediting them as being fake or altered. There are countless pictures, videos and credible witness testimony out there and these pics wouldn't change these peoples mind- it seems they are determined to pull the wool over their own eyes.
I am not saying that they have to believe in UFO's, but just asking that people actually think before just parroting back what they have heard said by others.
None of us were there, none of us really know what happened and none of us can claim to be important enough to be told the truth. Must admit I had never heard this one before, but it does raise some interesting thoughts and questions.
Amazing how he can't show us the photos. Typical BS conspiracy theorist crap where they say "sorry, the photos are being studied and cannot be released to the public" crap. These astronauts gave their lives advancing humanity and science. Do not belittle their deaths with crazy conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.
once again nothing proved. Don't explain how the shit happened you have the prof in your hand so what you scared too be fined by who ever? If you have hardcore proof then show the fucking people!!! your just showing a new version of an old take get real. take is sooooooooooo cheap
i beleive that the shuttles downfall was from styrofoam, if it was ufos, im sure they would be able to fry the shuttle in a second than aim for its wing... i do beleive in UFO's (ive seen dozens on NASA's own footage -- even thou they try their hardest to pan away from them etc--- ) but here its styrofoam....
Your comments about "since I don't have any pictures longer than a tenth of a second...and therefore this must be advanced weaponry..." is sheer junk science and not a valid logical statement. Since I don't have any pictures of your brain suggests you don't have one or maybe some advanced alien technology sucked it out of your head. Stop with the crap unless you can prove it. This is not even remotely close to proof of anything except a total waste of time watching this video.
now see this may be a "mock-umentary" last year in my biology class we watched one of those about the world being flat...and as crazy as it sounds it was VERY convincing and actualy cast a small amount of doubt in my mind.
New thought you know how you hear that the shuttles get canceled for weather related reasons right so ask your self this why would Nasa launch a shuttle in to space with a Bad Tile. There is possiably some truth to this story and I am More sure of this then a ceramic Tile that was bad....
NASA's explanation for the Columbia being hit by a piece of ice-filled, high-speed foam is not credible. The Shuttle and the tank were travelling at the same speed. The icy foam only had a few feet in which to be slowed. The difference in velocity between the Shuttle and the foam was minimal.
it was just foam (not icy foam). the foam was exposed to DRAG! it has little mass relative to its surface area. Don't be so naive. (as a comparison) Throw a box of tissue out of your car window at 60mph, with the side of your car having a thin layer of styrofoam on that side. the box WILL damage the styrofoam.
The shuttle TPS is somewhat similar to compressed house insulation. it doesnt take much to damage it. Even rain can.
Obviously, you have no clue what you're talking about. I'm 100% against this war. Our troops should be here. I question EVERYTHING the government says. This is why I'm no longer in the military. Provide proof that the UFO was the killer. Otherwise, you're a joke.
Thats only part of the reason the shuttle is still considered experimental. Many launches had foam issues, and ALL launches had tile issues, but STS-1 had among the worst. Look it up anywhere you'd like.
yes there is a war going on betten good and evil what does that say about man...let alone the firer of the weapon...orgonite the lot and let god sort it out...
And I'm realistic. I have watched every shuttle launch live and replays in the engineer video feeds since STS-90. I read all 248 pages of the CAIB.The foam strike was clearly, obviously the cause of failure. Not a god damned UFO.
so explain why no one else has brought this UFO vs. STS-107 attack possiblity up. Never mentioned at (space) .com, (nasaspaceflight) .com or (spaceflightnow). com message boards.
No, I don't follow Christianity. I question everything, including inconsistent religions. Yes, those MB's have lengthy discussions about UFO's and the like. check out (space)coms board.
I totally think extraterrestrials exist, it's arrogant not to. but if they were of higher intelligence, they would probably let us know.
I totally think extraterrestrials exist, it's arrogant not to. but if they were of higher intelligence, they would probably let us know.
Okay,good point.But you are assuming they are from outer space.Know anything about quantum physics? Or maybe they are so much more advanced than us that the
communication link is broken.Try to have a discussion with an Ant or Bee.Who knows?
They couldn't be so much more advanced than us simply due to distances involved. If they were, they would be no more than a few million years ahead, and they would leave a definitive sign. Not sone that this crackpot saw. As you increase speed, so does your mass. At C, you are of infinite mass. Its not likely they're visiting just to kill a shuttle.
Prove that they provide their own gravity fields (again, a factor of mass). Provide a link proving that Einsteinian and Newtonian laws of physics don't apply. Otherwise, what you just said is total horse shit.
Besides, why in the HELL would UFOs have any interest in shooting down a spacecraft that can't even reach a 300 mile orbit?
hey, could that funky pink light be the same one in the " FOX News captures UFO on STS-107 Columbia incident " youtube video? If this fox news video is real, that is some scary stuff. you can see a light beam come out of what looks like a ufo beaming toward the shuttle. OMG!
The only place the shuttle can go is low earth ortbit. If the "aliens" want to keep us on this planet all they have to do is not mess with the shuttle! As long as the shuttle is our only spacecraft we aren't going anywhere!
It is Halloween night.... 2007. At this time.... there are thousands of assholes working underground.... using tax money from all of us Americans... and just jerking them selves off cause they can't figure out what to do with this technology cause they don't have enough scientologists to figure it out. Rot in hell..... assholes. Your mothers will never be proud of you... Even after death.
Within 5 years.... we will all know the truth. period. There are thousands flying around this planet each and every second. I know it seems impossible.... but that's just the reality of it. Like i said.... by the year 2012.... WE WILL ALL KNOW.
We will never know the truth on this matter. Period. You have the disclosure project with witnesses who worked in top secret projects & state they observed UFOs, are certain they pose no threat to security (aside from disabling nuclear weaponry). Now we have people claiming that they are responsible for the destruction of Columbia. If any of this is true the US will certainly build a defence programme in an attempt to destroy them. Game over.
Oh hell no! ufo shooting our spacecraft WTF??? This better not be the start of the ET false flag attack. should'n we acknowledge aliens existence before we ever go to war with them?
Mhaaahhhh we don't even know what to believe anymore...it's obvious that people won't believe any of it if these guys keep talking about having evidence but never showing it,yeah,maybe it's real and they know humans are not quite prepared for stuff like this...but sometimes i think: Humans have seen a lot of things over the years so i guess that seeing a couple of pictures won't do any harm o_O
It is amazing to me how many sceptics are out there, it must be easier to deny it then except it, WE ARE NOT ALONE and we are being lied to by the goverments of this world. MASS HESTARIA is being avoided by cover ups and lies. What happens to the story of GOD if it is all true? think about it, the advance in technology has spead up 1 million times in the last 100 years, ask yourself... How?
PARANOIA at its best... Hey you know 9/11 wasn't terrorist either, aliens took over the planes to start a war between us and other countries so we will kill each other off till they can take over our planet... LOOK I CAN DO IT TOO :)
this is aload of bull.. we all seen the foam come off and strike the shuttle.. i watched them do tests on that kind of foam.. fired it at the same rate it would of impacted the shuttle and the damage was major. you could fire a frozen pea at something at tremendous force and watch the damage it does.. just because it was foam doesnt mean its weak.. you wanna prove this theory.. show us the damn pics!! somehow.. get them on the internet for all to see!
So the piece of styrofoam insulation or whatever it was coming off the fuel tank and hitting the wing of the shuttle and making a hole on launch, and heat getting in the wing on re-entry was a load of bollox then? so what about the footage that you see of the foam hitting the wing when the film was examined? made up?
Bits coming off the shuttle happen all the time. It's essentially a piece of 20th century junk. If foam did that much damage it shows just what quality they built the shuttle to :D You're sat on top of a massive incendiary device. So foam could have come off but it doesn't make a difference to the fact that two RELIABLE witnesses saw UFO type activity does it?
- NASA are well versed in the art of deceiving the public as demonstrated by the seizure of photos. Here's the real news... a secondary space access system has existed since circa 1958. This system was provided by human/ET liaison NOT by human only advances.
In what way do you substantiate *any* of these witnesses as being 'reliable?' They do not show what they base everything on - in fact, they are merely talking about photos which they claim exist. Believe me, media outlets would buy these for the full story. You say The Discovery Channel used the photos? After that point, they remain to be used in the public domain by *any* news outlet that can substantiate that bringing them would be oaf particularly important character.
The astronomer who took the pics name is Peter Goldie. Discovery did a documentary which covered the lightning strike [absurd] theory - this features those images. Obviously it's OK to show them:
- When paid
- When associated with an non-threatening theory
Peter Goldie bent over when the boys from NASA's intel dept came knocking.
there is an "ET war" going on ...there are "dark" Et forces colaborating with a dark-covert-government of human forces that is now facing their end, against the LIGHT forces(good ET's) through devine intervention,they are here to protect us...this war is in its end times,i know this sounds crazy from the perspective of this paradigm,and the "belief system" that you have been instilled with,a new paradigm is coming to light and fruition,embrace it and live in the energy of love,peace,BrunoSmith
THE BAD GUYS are the USA and G8 and dark FORCES which are always planning to destroy the Van Ellen Belt, to get our, and also to destroy Mankind with WARS, and LIES
usacuracao 2 weeks ago
there you go again the american people do not need to no what happen to the shuttle stop letting them treat you as children you pay taxes you fight in wars you die in wars but you dont need to no the truth but you can be told a big fat lie and thats alright wake up america wake up before its to late. see you on the other side
MrTestpilot7 6 months ago
FAKE!
KohviKruus 11 months ago
Wow!
Talk about building your straw man to knock it down later by this conspiracy peddler. Lighting strike, a NASA investigator did suggest that maybe lighting struck the shuttle before launch but strike affects electronic equipment & it is a known fact the shuttles & earlier rockets have been struck by lighting on their launching pads.
But the lighting strike was shot down since Columbia suffered structural damage on a tile, not by lighting strike
OverlordShamala 1 year ago
finally he said it, "like a cork screw & scraggly" bolt of what appeared to be lightening. It goes by the shuttle & as if 2 "lock onto the shuttle" changes direction & makes a direct hit~This is wat I read when the first pic's & statement came out rite aftr the shuttle was "blown up"~If U look at the video of the rocket w/the nuclear warhead that was on it's way to the moon a UFO hits it with a "direct beam" of lite & does this 3 times~Not in cork screw/scraggly manner~ CAN NE1 SAY HAARP/SCALAR!
HigherWaysWoman 1 year ago
@HigherWaysWoman
Are you talking about a recreation of an event described by witness who were observing a launch of a ballistic missile carrying a dummy warhead?
OverlordShamala 1 year ago
@OverlordShamala actually I don't really care about any of this any more. Thankfully I have learned that I need to pull my head out of this crap along w/so called 2012 which is equal to Y2K. i've learned who the true enemy is...which is Britain. All this crap that is going on stems from them. They've done a great job shifting focus from them onto russia, germany, china, etc. Best Gift we can give ourselves is to ignore all this ufo & 2012 b.s. I wish you much success & peace. Best of Wishes
HigherWaysWoman 1 year ago
That would be about the only way Secretly you could test such a weapon. I don't think Russia/China would like real missile launches much less a successful shoot down because the arms race would be on then!!! Around the time Vladimir Putin was shitting his pants about Our nuclear defense plans and accused the USA of secret agendas that could provoke another Arms Race. Star wars designed for NO Nukes or UFO'S or both. So Space Shuttles are perfect target practice, Space Ship riding a ICBM.
6619bryanozzy 1 year ago
Maybe we shot it down? When kings were buried they would some times kill all grave diggers to keep the tomb location secret. If there was some kind of top secret duty while in space, the Astronauts wouldn't have been briefed until their destination. What about Regan's star wars? Very shortly after Korea Lunched those so called defective missiles NASA scheduled 30+missions to space in just a few years, Who funded that? Maybe star wars was an early costly experiment until "HEY IT WORK'S" Bush!!!
6619bryanozzy 1 year ago
Lightning can't strike over 30 frames? Bud you never knew my x.
YouTubbingGeorge 1 year ago
nano technology?
altoids79762 1 year ago
Cool!!
theman2720 1 year ago
I cannot believe I can't post what i want to say
danlo3333 1 year ago
hes got to come to alberta to see are lighting here. it paules 8 to 9 times befor it disappears lasting way longer then 5 shot on a still camera. hmmm was the shuttle columbia the one that went out in to the vanellen belt and got a dose of radiation when they did a wide flip around the space staion. that it might have did more then just made the crue see lights floating just a thought
withinthetruth 2 years ago
Blue spiral light beam? Where have we seen that before? Hint NORWAY.
chico280 2 years ago
It's obvious they've been watching and what ever experiment or ritual was performed onboard the shuttle greatly offended the gods of above and they destroyed the offending hand and at the same time spoke clearly to those members of the Order of Columbia.
tribexa 2 years ago
he's is right and the reason i say that is because i got one of those pic's and i'm not joking guy's. i always wanted to upload it but i dont know should i. i dont have the rights because it's not mine but also could coase some truoble. but what he said in this video is true. it might not be ufo but whatever it was it didnt miss the shuttle.
MrMadUtdMan 2 years ago
Im not saying you should, but i don't see why people have not leaked them. There is a lot of public places where it is possible to do so.
Nurken7 2 years ago
Is there anyway you could sent me a copy to my YOUTUBE account? I also had a copy buy it mysteriously disappeared when I took my computer to get fixed. Please think about it.
OrisLover 2 years ago
if it was shot down by a UFO it would explain why NASA was very insistant that people do not come in contact with the debrits though they did anyway...
Defconfx 2 years ago
NASA figured out and Goldie concurred that Columbia was already in frame. And because he had to push the release on the camera (no cable release) the bright orbiter left a squiggly purplish line before the camera settled to motionless. The reason you see a dimmer, straight trail on the left side is because the shuttle's trail is persistant. A lesson if you're going to take long exposures of a reentering shuttle, use a cable release and open shutter before shuttle is in frame. ..no jiggle!
x24val 2 years ago
Look up Moon mining Anti gravity John Hodge Bases on Moon and Mars. I am guessing that the Astronauts were safely beamed out of the shuttle onto a UFO to be taken for more work on Moon or Mars, the shuttle shot down was just to prevent investigations.
Topazman12 2 years ago
Where can we find the original pictures he is talking about?
Namaste0909 2 years ago
My 2 cents is it's a hoax.
1. Photographing a object moving at 17,000 mph with a 35 mm camera and a telephoto lens on a tripod is very hard to do.
2. The frame 2:42 of the photo you show and report the shuttle to be the "green streak" dose not vaguely resemble the shuttle. It could be anything.
3. The frame 3:15 you report the "plasma particle weapon" to hit the shuttle. The debris flow is moving along with the shuttle. If the anything hit the shuttle
tomharrell1954 3 years ago
would at least some of the debris explode out and be left in a trail????
4. I believe in ETs and I believe we have shot at ETs before. I also believe they have returned fire after they have been fired upon. But I have never seen any other reports where ET started an engagement.
5. Why would they shoot down the shuttle on the way home instead of going into space? We have been in space a long time for the ETs to become territorial at this late date. Conclusion: hoax or wrong ID
tomharrell1954 3 years ago
The answer to your question: watch?v=jBsh-7S9tWE
rommerro17 3 years ago
Thanks for your reply. But what I said in 5 is still valid. 5. Why would they shoot down the shuttle on the way home instead of going into space? We have been in space a long time for the ETs to become territorial at this late date.
tomharrell1954 3 years ago
perhaps they do are the ones whom do not want us to venture off the planet.
dmtirino 3 years ago
I don't think so. If I was posting a warning to a neighbor. I would have made an example of what not to do by stopping his unwanted act at the beginning. ie.. They would have shot down Friendship 7 and made the Mercury program a complete failure instead of a fairly successful program.
tomharrell1954 3 years ago
nobody cares what you have to say.
MudkipBlackieChan9k 3 years ago
I have two dogs that listen to me intently.
tomharrell1954 3 years ago
heavens gate??? awesome students do you believe?
whiteferio 3 years ago
yes, thank you for pointing this out, ignorant stay ignorant!!!
whiteferio 3 years ago 4
Interesting....
Molliepet 3 years ago 2
... the ground atop a tripod. I just don't think its feasable. But its only an opinion and everyone is entitled to theirs. I do believe there are other forms of life in the area of the universe we are located in, and I do think Governments are keeping secrets, but I dont think the shuttle was shot down by any human made weapon.. I welcome intelligent responses. peace..
monkeyfist29 3 years ago
face to foot style how'd you like it????? yes, i agree
whiteferio 3 years ago
I dont understand the face to foot thing? could you expand a little on that pls?
Thanks for your comment though.. :-)
monkeyfist29 3 years ago
One thing bothers me. The guy who took the photos was using an ordinary 35mm SLR right?
The shuttle was How High?
Doing what speed?
I studied photography, I did motosport journalism for my final major. Ever tried to follow a racing car doing 150mph around a track with a telephoto lens? Its bloody hard. A shuttle doing in excess of 12,000 miles an hour?!?! Plus what size was the lens? I have a 1000ml laser stabilised Canon lens. I cannot see how these pics could have been taken from...
monkeyfist29 3 years ago
-
Yet again loads of ppl are moaning about the photos not being shown... well you don't look far. The main one is on the Exopolitics UK site as I've said before and linked to.
-
exopol 3 years ago
wen it happen
wwe5lifeveryday 3 years ago
A well presented argument, in my opinion.
I have no problem with disbelievers as I saw UFOs in 1972 & have always accepted that if someone had told me a story like my own & I hadn't seen them for myself I would think they were either nuts or well intentioned but mistaken.
I keep an open mind on this theory. Thereagain, after what I witnessed in 1972, I am bound to.
I look forward to further disclosure on this one.
Thank you for posting it. Your efforts are appreciated & not in vain.
The1stBaby 3 years ago 2
WHY are you all so sure of yourselves about something you have absolutly no idea about? Is it that hard to comprehend that your government would keep secrets from you? History says no. In our entire universe is it more likly or not that we are the only living beings?
pcpsex 3 years ago
Well said. The fact the pictures aren`t allowed to be shown publically...is all the evidence you need.David never shows us the pics `cause he`d go to prison...or worse!
nerocole 3 years ago
It is inevitable that the people saying they need the pictures in order to believe, would find some way of discrediting them as being fake or altered. There are countless pictures, videos and credible witness testimony out there and these pics wouldn't change these peoples mind- it seems they are determined to pull the wool over their own eyes.
pcpsex 3 years ago 2
I am not saying that they have to believe in UFO's, but just asking that people actually think before just parroting back what they have heard said by others.
pcpsex 3 years ago
it wasn't lightning, therefore... it must be aliens! aliens, I tells ya!
thepsiborg 3 years ago
load of tosh..where's the photos?? end of story.
bally28 3 years ago
None of us were there, none of us really know what happened and none of us can claim to be important enough to be told the truth. Must admit I had never heard this one before, but it does raise some interesting thoughts and questions.
Thanks for the video!
wanyinchoy 3 years ago
Amazing how he can't show us the photos. Typical BS conspiracy theorist crap where they say "sorry, the photos are being studied and cannot be released to the public" crap. These astronauts gave their lives advancing humanity and science. Do not belittle their deaths with crazy conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.
borg12of13 3 years ago
once again nothing proved. Don't explain how the shit happened you have the prof in your hand so what you scared too be fined by who ever? If you have hardcore proof then show the fucking people!!! your just showing a new version of an old take get real. take is sooooooooooo cheap
nirob 3 years ago
i beleive that the shuttles downfall was from styrofoam, if it was ufos, im sure they would be able to fry the shuttle in a second than aim for its wing... i do beleive in UFO's (ive seen dozens on NASA's own footage -- even thou they try their hardest to pan away from them etc--- ) but here its styrofoam....
crazyknight69 3 years ago
I can not BELIEVE how many STUPID people are out there that believe this BULL.
festus3030 3 years ago
The first Israeli astronaut was on that shuttle.
ratkillerinparadise 3 years ago
good he is dead
SteveCrank 3 years ago
This is the same god damn video as part one.
theukbdvsthecbd 3 years ago
"This is the same god damn video as part one. "
- You're *really* slow aren't you?
exopol 3 years ago 5
It ended up being a piece of Styrofoam, lol, so this probably wasn't done by UFO's, BUT, I do believe in UFO's...Just not this one.
1981z28camaro 3 years ago
Again ---> Thank you David!.
tucomprend 3 years ago
LOL near the speed of light? Not even close.
Aplesause 3 years ago
check out shiv68.he's got one of the real pics as his background.
nenefaith86 3 years ago
i saw them. HOLY SHIT!
cenasux12 3 years ago
It's not traveling at the speed of light, because light is instantanious...
Or is it.
EINSTEIN!!!
Gooey2007 3 years ago
Anything is possible.
SummerDreams2008 3 years ago
Your comments about "since I don't have any pictures longer than a tenth of a second...and therefore this must be advanced weaponry..." is sheer junk science and not a valid logical statement. Since I don't have any pictures of your brain suggests you don't have one or maybe some advanced alien technology sucked it out of your head. Stop with the crap unless you can prove it. This is not even remotely close to proof of anything except a total waste of time watching this video.
cer365 3 years ago
-
Bye then! You obviously enjoyed it enough to write a nice little comment ;)
-
exopol 3 years ago
now see this may be a "mock-umentary" last year in my biology class we watched one of those about the world being flat...and as crazy as it sounds it was VERY convincing and actualy cast a small amount of doubt in my mind.
Ghostly31 3 years ago
why whenever they have pictures and proof of stuff like their never allowed to show it or they dnt want to???
it really fucks me off
showermanisgreeeeezy 4 years ago 4
check out shiv68.he's got one of the real pics as his background.
nenefaith86 3 years ago
We know what these murdering bastards can do, but until i see proof, i can't throw my opinion on this topic.
I will keep an open mind and wait for the photographs that are alleged to exist.
If the photographer wanted people to believe that Columbia was shot down, why not show the photographs? Doesn't make sense right now.
crazymoo56 4 years ago
-
There is a fair bit of data on the fact shuttle missions are being used for testing of exotic energy gadgets.
These may well be embargo'd by the ETI federations that exist outside of earth's gravity well.
-
exopol 4 years ago
New thought you know how you hear that the shuttles get canceled for weather related reasons right so ask your self this why would Nasa launch a shuttle in to space with a Bad Tile. There is possiably some truth to this story and I am More sure of this then a ceramic Tile that was bad....
donatakimonk 4 years ago
Thanks.
OneWingedElf 4 years ago
f** K IT SHOW the PICTURES
clos2one0 4 years ago
Very intruiging. Does anyone on here no of what the original 5 pictures look like or where I can see them?
OneWingedElf 4 years ago
Yup -
One of the original pics is on Exopolitics UK site, do a google search for "shuttle shot down"
-
exopol 4 years ago
nice story absolutly no proof. 9/11 truth actually has some proof to it therefore a little more credible anyone could have made this up.
CAinfowarrior 4 years ago
You know Thats exactly what I surmised that occured that day but why? what did the shuttle see or bring back?
Repomex01 4 years ago
u said actually alot. :P
Zachmister 4 years ago
NASA's explanation for the Columbia being hit by a piece of ice-filled, high-speed foam is not credible. The Shuttle and the tank were travelling at the same speed. The icy foam only had a few feet in which to be slowed. The difference in velocity between the Shuttle and the foam was minimal.
UncleChucko 4 years ago
it was just foam (not icy foam). the foam was exposed to DRAG! it has little mass relative to its surface area. Don't be so naive. (as a comparison) Throw a box of tissue out of your car window at 60mph, with the side of your car having a thin layer of styrofoam on that side. the box WILL damage the styrofoam.
The shuttle TPS is somewhat similar to compressed house insulation. it doesnt take much to damage it. Even rain can.
JephN 4 years ago
Whatever the Government says, we believe! Good for you JephN. And good luck looking for those WMDs in Iraq.
UncleChucko 4 years ago
Obviously, you have no clue what you're talking about. I'm 100% against this war. Our troops should be here. I question EVERYTHING the government says. This is why I'm no longer in the military. Provide proof that the UFO was the killer. Otherwise, you're a joke.
JephN 4 years ago
You're telling me NASA KNEW about the foam "threat" and repeatedly let that tin can go up into orbit??!!
Foam my ass. Sounds like a piss-take from the NW0(wned²) to me.
-
exopol 4 years ago
Thats only part of the reason the shuttle is still considered experimental. Many launches had foam issues, and ALL launches had tile issues, but STS-1 had among the worst. Look it up anywhere you'd like.
JephN 4 years ago
yes there is a war going on betten good and evil what does that say about man...let alone the firer of the weapon...orgonite the lot and let god sort it out...
primal111 4 years ago
FOX News captures UFO on STS-107 Columbia incident.
copy and paste this!!
mifo214 4 years ago
energia . sl . pl / shuttle / ufo_attacks_columbia . j p g
--
tetragrammaton-ankh.blogspot com
frosteesmn666 4 years ago
SEE UFO ON COLOMBIA INCIDENT!
cocon57 4 years ago
Good gods...how much jackassery can one guy spew forth from his mouth?
UFO's shooting down the columbia? How absurd.
Utter feces.
JephN 4 years ago
Then you really have little clue about NASA and alternative space systems.
exopol 4 years ago
Yeah. You just keep thinking that.
JephN 4 years ago
The Earth round?! How absurd.
You're a dick.
girlspieguys 4 years ago
And I'm realistic. I have watched every shuttle launch live and replays in the engineer video feeds since STS-90. I read all 248 pages of the CAIB.The foam strike was clearly, obviously the cause of failure. Not a god damned UFO.
JephN 4 years ago
Yo but "C" I'm just being realistic man.I have traveled from
here to Asia the eastern route and
if you try to go there the western
route you will fall off the edge of the Earth.That's if you don't get eaten by
Dragons first.Look it's in this book.
girlspieguys 4 years ago
so explain why no one else has brought this UFO vs. STS-107 attack possiblity up. Never mentioned at (space) .com, (nasaspaceflight) .com or (spaceflightnow). com message boards.
JephN 4 years ago
I have never been to these sites.
Have any of them ever mentioned anything about UFO's EVER? Let me guess-but you
believe in Jesus and God right? I don't get some people.We are floating around on some
rock in the middle of nowhere,but UFO's are hard to swallow?
girlspieguys 4 years ago
No, I don't follow Christianity. I question everything, including inconsistent religions. Yes, those MB's have lengthy discussions about UFO's and the like. check out (space)coms board.
I totally think extraterrestrials exist, it's arrogant not to. but if they were of higher intelligence, they would probably let us know.
JephN 4 years ago
I totally think extraterrestrials exist, it's arrogant not to. but if they were of higher intelligence, they would probably let us know.
Okay,good point.But you are assuming they are from outer space.Know anything about quantum physics? Or maybe they are so much more advanced than us that the
communication link is broken.Try to have a discussion with an Ant or Bee.Who knows?
girlspieguys 4 years ago
They couldn't be so much more advanced than us simply due to distances involved. If they were, they would be no more than a few million years ahead, and they would leave a definitive sign. Not sone that this crackpot saw. As you increase speed, so does your mass. At C, you are of infinite mass. Its not likely they're visiting just to kill a shuttle.
JephN 4 years ago
That's old hat... these craft create their own gravity fields. Newton/Einstein laws don't apply.
exopol 4 years ago
Prove that they provide their own gravity fields (again, a factor of mass). Provide a link proving that Einsteinian and Newtonian laws of physics don't apply. Otherwise, what you just said is total horse shit.
Besides, why in the HELL would UFOs have any interest in shooting down a spacecraft that can't even reach a 300 mile orbit?
JephN 4 years ago
hey, could that funky pink light be the same one in the " FOX News captures UFO on STS-107 Columbia incident " youtube video? If this fox news video is real, that is some scary stuff. you can see a light beam come out of what looks like a ufo beaming toward the shuttle. OMG!
magdie08 4 years ago
holy sh1t , i just seen that. definatly some light. its amazing how there is no comment on the footage whilst being on the news!
mifo214 4 years ago
HOOLY SHIIIT !
EnoDude 4 years ago 2
The only place the shuttle can go is low earth ortbit. If the "aliens" want to keep us on this planet all they have to do is not mess with the shuttle! As long as the shuttle is our only spacecraft we aren't going anywhere!
robsmith49 4 years ago
It is Halloween night.... 2007. At this time.... there are thousands of assholes working underground.... using tax money from all of us Americans... and just jerking them selves off cause they can't figure out what to do with this technology cause they don't have enough scientologists to figure it out. Rot in hell..... assholes. Your mothers will never be proud of you... Even after death.
devilfan1967 4 years ago
Within 5 years.... we will all know the truth. period. There are thousands flying around this planet each and every second. I know it seems impossible.... but that's just the reality of it. Like i said.... by the year 2012.... WE WILL ALL KNOW.
devilfan1967 4 years ago
We will never know the truth on this matter. Period. You have the disclosure project with witnesses who worked in top secret projects & state they observed UFOs, are certain they pose no threat to security (aside from disabling nuclear weaponry). Now we have people claiming that they are responsible for the destruction of Columbia. If any of this is true the US will certainly build a defence programme in an attempt to destroy them. Game over.
blackacid 4 years ago
Oh hell no! ufo shooting our spacecraft WTF??? This better not be the start of the ET false flag attack. should'n we acknowledge aliens existence before we ever go to war with them?
Eintr3eipied8 4 years ago
"FOX News captures UFO on STS-107 Columbia incident"
check it out :)
RPFS2008 4 years ago
ROFL, Can't show us the pictures.
Sure you can't
Sabiancym 4 years ago 2
haha, coz they dont exist...psssh
LVKcrew 4 years ago
Mhaaahhhh we don't even know what to believe anymore...it's obvious that people won't believe any of it if these guys keep talking about having evidence but never showing it,yeah,maybe it's real and they know humans are not quite prepared for stuff like this...but sometimes i think: Humans have seen a lot of things over the years so i guess that seeing a couple of pictures won't do any harm o_O
misery667 4 years ago
It is amazing to me how many sceptics are out there, it must be easier to deny it then except it, WE ARE NOT ALONE and we are being lied to by the goverments of this world. MASS HESTARIA is being avoided by cover ups and lies. What happens to the story of GOD if it is all true? think about it, the advance in technology has spead up 1 million times in the last 100 years, ask yourself... How?
AMVeller 4 years ago
PARANOIA at its best... Hey you know 9/11 wasn't terrorist either, aliens took over the planes to start a war between us and other countries so we will kill each other off till they can take over our planet... LOOK I CAN DO IT TOO :)
stihlslingin 4 years ago
*yamn*
edstar83 4 years ago
*yamn*
edstar83 4 years ago
Spot on stihlslingin!
Maxwell and Leir are both Cabal spokesmen,a pair of lying cunts is what they are.
Fearmongering arseholes...
And this cockend investment banker???WTF??
Total and utter nonsence!
I think Americans are more than capable of
fxcking over one another without the need to blame Star Visitors!
bibblybobbly 4 years ago
Somebody gonna tell me something!Myspace/utadoomsday
u1ta 4 years ago
this is aload of bull.. we all seen the foam come off and strike the shuttle.. i watched them do tests on that kind of foam.. fired it at the same rate it would of impacted the shuttle and the damage was major. you could fire a frozen pea at something at tremendous force and watch the damage it does.. just because it was foam doesnt mean its weak.. you wanna prove this theory.. show us the damn pics!! somehow.. get them on the internet for all to see!
Quigley420 4 years ago
its real its true !!
theufokid 4 years ago
fucking gay, just show the photos
cujo97864 4 years ago
he cant! this guy is very smart he knows exaCTLY what hes saying
theufokid 4 years ago
So the piece of styrofoam insulation or whatever it was coming off the fuel tank and hitting the wing of the shuttle and making a hole on launch, and heat getting in the wing on re-entry was a load of bollox then? so what about the footage that you see of the foam hitting the wing when the film was examined? made up?
peteq1972 4 years ago
Really. They have all this video they played over and over again on CNN. Was that video real?
highhorse313 4 years ago
i don`t know now :\
peteq1972 4 years ago
-
Bits coming off the shuttle happen all the time. It's essentially a piece of 20th century junk. If foam did that much damage it shows just what quality they built the shuttle to :D You're sat on top of a massive incendiary device. So foam could have come off but it doesn't make a difference to the fact that two RELIABLE witnesses saw UFO type activity does it?
exopol 4 years ago
- NASA are well versed in the art of deceiving the public as demonstrated by the seizure of photos. Here's the real news... a secondary space access system has existed since circa 1958. This system was provided by human/ET liaison NOT by human only advances.
exopol 4 years ago
In what way do you substantiate *any* of these witnesses as being 'reliable?' They do not show what they base everything on - in fact, they are merely talking about photos which they claim exist. Believe me, media outlets would buy these for the full story. You say The Discovery Channel used the photos? After that point, they remain to be used in the public domain by *any* news outlet that can substantiate that bringing them would be oaf particularly important character.
jenskristian 4 years ago
i love this guy hes so smart and he knows alot and he smart and he knows alot u get the idea
theufokid 4 years ago
he sure did... exopol...paid to bend over...classic
strokesgroupie 4 years ago
The astronomer who took the pics name is Peter Goldie. Discovery did a documentary which covered the lightning strike [absurd] theory - this features those images. Obviously it's OK to show them:
- When paid
- When associated with an non-threatening theory
Peter Goldie bent over when the boys from NASA's intel dept came knocking.
exopol 4 years ago
there is an "ET war" going on ...there are "dark" Et forces colaborating with a dark-covert-government of human forces that is now facing their end, against the LIGHT forces(good ET's) through devine intervention,they are here to protect us...this war is in its end times,i know this sounds crazy from the perspective of this paradigm,and the "belief system" that you have been instilled with,a new paradigm is coming to light and fruition,embrace it and live in the energy of love,peace,BrunoSmith
strokesgroupie 4 years ago
thank you strokesgroupie, you know what is going on and if more people dont find out then our soles will perish forever.
INEEDREVENGE 4 years ago
What is the name of the owner of these photos? someone post a link
fairtaxPresident2008 4 years ago