Why should the countering acoustic expert be "neutral" and who gets to play God in making such a determination? Is not the expert appearing on behalf of the developer paid for his services by the development interest? How does that circumstance qualify as more neutral than the evidence potentially presented by the expert from Okemos? Wouldn't he/she be subject to the same professional standards for accuracy of information as the expert employed by the developer?
Why should the countering acoustic expert be "neutral" and who gets to play God in making such a determination? Is not the expert appearing on behalf of the developer paid for his services by the development interest? How does that circumstance qualify as more neutral than the evidence potentially presented by the expert from Okemos? Wouldn't he/she be subject to the same professional standards for accuracy of information as the expert employed by the developer?
SaveWesternOHIO 1 year ago