Darwin's Evolution Religion Falsely Called Science in Public Schools - Part 1 of 3

[p90x4lifewaswrong64]

I don't debate Creationists just as a Geographer wouldn't debate a Flat-Earther, but I just wanted to take the time to thank God for the fact that your video only has 580 views and that you have suspended your medical practice. Good luck with your preaching though.

[CAnswersTV]

@p90x4lifewaswrong64 The only "God" you believe in is Charles Darwin & his evolution mythology. Darwin's religion, of which you are a follower, is composed of three elements (a sort of triune "god" of evolutionism) for which you put ALL your trust, namely, FATHER TIME (unlimited billions of years), MOTHER NATURE (only natural processes), & LADY LUCK (chance probabilities). You are deluded & why? "For this cause God shall send them strong delusion that they should believe a lie" (2 Thess 2:11).

[LucianUramu]

No I don't know what "scientism" is since it isn't a real word...

As for who has a metaphysical position, the one that claims things are to complex not to involve magic seems to better fit that title. And as for complexity of the eye itself then I guess your god spent more time concerned about mantis shrimp then humans' visual capacity. "Even a liar can tell you the truth." Are you the liar then? Btw can and willing too are two very different things, so I won't hold my breath for you to say it.

[CAnswersTV]

@LucianUramu Thanks for displaying your ignorance for all to see; according to Wikipedia: "Scientism is the idea that natural science is the most authoritative worldview or aspect of human education, and that it is superior to all other interpretations of life.[1] The term is used by social scientists such as Friedrich Hayek,[2] or philosophers of science such as Karl Popper." Since you're ignorant it proves everything else you say is also ignorant. Your "mantis shrimp" doesn't disprove God.

[SanguineBullet667]

Whoever made this video is obviously an uneducated bigot

[CAnswersTV]

@SanguineBullet667 The only "uneducated bigot" talking is you. "To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, & for the correction of spherical & chromatic abberation, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree" - Charles Darwin (1809-1882), British naturalist, "On the Origin of Species," 1859, chapter 6. Evolution is ABSURD!

[CarnivorousBiped]

@CAnswersTV Quote mining, are we? Should have continued reading:

"Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex

eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its

possessor, can be shown to exist;..."

[CAnswersTV]

@CarnivorousBiped Quote mining? "Yet reason", what reason? You have something "perfect & complex" with NOTHING to show HOW it got there, get it? How about some more quotes: "I became convinced that people believe in evolution because they choose to do so. It has nothing at all to do with evidence. Evolution is NOT A FACT, as so many bigots maintain. There is not a shread of evidence for the evolution of life on earth." - A.J. Monty White, Ph.D. in gas kinetics, University College of Wales.

[LucianUramu]

@CAnswersTV

Fail 1 "perfect & complex" the human eye has less resolution & complexity then most species like wolves, owls, insects. The mantis shrimp in fact can see in both ultraviolet and infrared. I guess its eyes are "perfecter" then ours.

Fail 2 Quoting someone with a Ph.D. in gas kinetics is like taking medical advice from an engineer. Yes they are smart but not in the field they have decided to through their weight in. Your attempt at reasoning is just sad.

[CAnswersTV]

@LucianUramu You "fail" on both counts & that's because evolutionary fairytale believers such as yourself can't see the nonsense of their metaphysical position since it is all based on a false sense of security called scientism. Do you even know what "scientism" is? You fail on the "complexity" of the eye since you're not getting the real argument here, the eyes of "wolves, owls, shrimp" or whatever are too complex to have randomly evolved, get it? 2nd "fail": even a liar can tell you the truth.

[p90x4lifewaswrong64]

@CarnivorousBiped Yeah, Creationists like to quote Darwin's rhetorical technique which was meant to offer something to his naysayers,... only then to disillusion them. It's useful, but Creationists often only quote the rhetorical part, and not what came after.

[Oallos1]

In the news today:

Deleting a gene removes a limit to learning and memory in mice. RGS14 appears to hold mice back mentally, John Hepler, PhD, professor of pharmacology at Emory University School of Medicine, says he and his colleagues have been jokingly calling it the "Homer Simpson gene." RGS14 is also found in humans.

Anyone care to speculate on the implication this has for evolution theory...?

...Yes this IS evidence AGAINST evolution theory.

[DJC9189]

Hahaha "best established facts in history"

Men who are experts in evidence, evidential law. Quick thinking on his feet to try and make that make sense lol. I know the first person i would ask about jesus' resurrection is an evidential law expert.

Hahahaha he wanted scientific evidence so went to unbias people with absolutely no vested interested in distorting facts in favour of the view he wanted reinforced. Not like an M.D would know any real scientists or anything.

Hahaha Gish! brilliant

[CAnswersTV]

@DJC9189 Your comment displays a "brillant" stupidity & ignorance which is par for the course for anyone who would believe that he evolved from a worm. You're so ignorant you haven't even heard of Simon Greenleaf (1783-1853), the famous Royall Professor of Law at Harvard University. Greenleaf wrote "A Treatise on the Law of Evidence" (1842) which is still used in law schools today. Greenleaf later wrote a volume concluding that the evidence for Christ's resurrection met all the rules of law.

[DrewDubious]

@CAnswersTV Simon Greenleaf's father in law was a Reverend. Would you suggest that Simon Greenleaf's research may have been biased towards proving religion instead of disproving? The man was not a scientist, he was also the President of the Massachussetts Bible Society. I ask again, ould you suggest that his research might (just might!) be biased?

[timeofwonder2009]

Hm, what about presenting your alleged proof instead of publicly demonstrating that you have not understood Darwinian evolution? Just one example: even if there was no fossil record at all the evidence for Darwinian evolution at hand would still be overwhelming. Also, I fail to understand how relying on logical fallacies, like the appeal to theory, even remotely do further the speaker's claim of maintaining an evidence-based argument.

[CAnswersTV]

@timeofwonder2009 The problem you have is complete ignorance of the opposing side's point of view. It is obvious from your comments here that you simply do not have a clue as to what the creation science perspective is.  It would bode well for you if you bothered to further research the subject rather than make these rather pointless comments to a very short 10 minute presentation. Why don't you check out the "Answers in Genesis" website or the "Institute for Creation Science" website first.

[CAnswersTV]

dogofthegaps it's obvious that you've NEVER studied the evidences that are well established to support the argument that you find so offensive. The argument DESERVES PLENTY OF ATTENTION but the problem is you DON'T WANT TO BELIEVE IT from the start otherwise you would have to totally change your way of living & actually live AS IF GOD REALLY EXISTED! Besides 2000 fulfilled Bible prophecies, historical, manuscript, & archeological evidences, there are fundamental FACTS (read "Case for Christ").

[dogofthegaps]

@CAnswersTV

Blah blah blah god this, jesus that.

Even your silly gospel stories can't get the resurrection straight, there are no eye witness accounts and christians assume that jesus rose from dead because they assume he was divine.

I stand by my comment, claiming that the resurrection of jesus is one of the best established facts in history is completely absurd to anyone who is not already a believer.

p.s. If it was proven that god existed I would have no reason to change how I live.

[CAnswersTV]

"dogofthegaps" Spoken like someone who is TRULY IGNORANT of the subject yet flaunts his IGNORANCE as if it were a badge of honor. You & your RIDICULOUS religious beliefs based on UNINFORMED NONSENSE is an amazing ILLOGICAL FALLACY to behold! Besides our our 3 websites, BIBLEQUERY ORG, HISTORYCART COM, & MUSLIMHOPE COM which are packed with decades of research, try reading Josh McDowell's "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" or Strobel's "The Case for Christ." Take your BALONEY somewhere else.

[anonymousnamealso]

@dogofthegaps 1. The apostles are eye witness believers. One wouldn't go to death unless they had seen a proven fact allowing them to believe something different than what they had been taught all their life.

2. The eyewitness of The various People which he came in front of when he resurrected.

3.His birth change our timeline, from people before him to after him. That makes us eye witness. 4. The roman empire, they persecuted his believers worse than the jews. Why?

[anonymousnamealso]

@dogofthegaps I 1never mentioned his birthday. you did. BIble doesn't give a date, just pagan man, much like yourself.

2. There were more than 1eyewitness report. as mentioned in the bible.

[imkluu]

Even if you had left out the proof of creationism, what was given refutes evolution in a logical and scientific manner. Evolutionists are always asking us to prove God and yet they cannot prove evolution. Both are based on faith only one of them is without any reason for it.

I have not found any one who has told me WHY they believe in evolution. But those that believe in God can usually tell me why they do.

Thank you for these videos.

[CAnswersTV]

@imkluu Thank you for your insightful comment here. The problem for the "evolutionist" unbelievers of this world is not they can't see the scientific evidence being presented by creationists (such as in this video for instance) but they simply DO NOT WANT TO BELIEVE IN GOD! Atheistic evolutionists have an emotional religious FAITH so that they can do away with the God of the Bible. Paul said it best in Romans 1:18-32, "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools." They hate God!

[ojoreakatheoj]

If you can explain what evolution is in your own words, I will take you seriously. Right now I'm not sure if you understand the process it describes.

[CAnswersTV]

@ojoreakatheoj you are still dodging MANY of my questions that I have brought up in this rather interesting discussion & your comment here is just an example of one more dodge. Never-the-less, try this: MACROEVOLUTION: large-scale and long-range evolution with base mechanics such as mutation, migration, genetic drift, and natural selection producing major evolutionary change IF given enough TIME. By this definition your MAGIC PIXIE DUST, your GOD, if you will, is TIME. TIME becomes GOD!

[Saullb9]

This is Great, Rationalism is by far the worst religion anyone can have (Atheism). Funny thing is, if you really know what Truth is then you would see the Bible by itself prove true to claims of Jesus Christ but one who has no understanding of this should look into it and you'll come out knowing God, not "believing".

[ojoreakatheoj]

LOL what!? This is so dense with BS that I don't know where to start... I'm overwhelmed with misinformation....

[CAnswersTV]

@ojoreakatheoj It should be a simple thing to tell us what "misformation" you have been "overwhelmed" with. For instance, our video on "Louis Farrakhan: Caucasians Are Devils" (on Youtube & Clipser; long versions on GOOGLE VIDEO & YAHOO VIDEO) we take the time to document what Farrakhan says about the mad scientist Yakub who created white people & then refute it from the Biblical record & scientific data. The same with Islam (we have 40 hours posted, search LARRY WESSELS on GOOGLE VIDEO).

[ojoreakatheoj]

Nope, it's not simple at all. It's like trying to drink water from a fire hydrant... there is just too much.

I wouldn't want to highlight one propagandist lapse in logic or truth and make it seem more important than the others.

OK OK OK i'll point out one blatant piece of nonsense... You really think there is indisputable evidence that a guy was tortured to death only to miraculously come back to life? Sounds like a zombe movie...

[CAnswersTV]

ojoreakatheoj I'm surprised that you've decided to question the resurrection of Christ rather than come on with some of your evolutionary fairytales which your Atheistic religion calls for. Since you already believe in a big bang & that man came from monkeys then it should be a small thing for a man to rise from the dead wouldn't you say? Since you already believe life came from dead matter in a primordial soup then what's the big deal about a resurrection, especially with so many witnesses?

[ojoreakatheoj]

LOL aren't you mr. presumptuous. You don't know if I'm an atheist or not, and you don't know what I believe... LOL @ You

Actually, it doesn't even matter. Obviously you don't understand what evolution is (it's not man coming from monkeys... lol...).

Your agenda seems to be to be nothing but academic vandalism... Please learn the science... at least enough to talk wittingly about it...

By the way, most people who consider themselves atheist define it as a rejection of religion.

[CAnswersTV]

ojoreakatheoj the PRESUMPTION is all yours my young "know-it-all" recent "graduate from University of CA at Davis, with a B.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering." Hoping to go to med school, huh? Virtually everything in your comment here, as with your other comments, is false. I have a university degree also & I have studied the "science" so-called (this video was shot at my alma mater) & the only vandalism taking place is by you with the laws of logic. Atheism IS A RELIGION & belief system.

[ojoreakatheoj]

My comments are false? Lets see... So far I have pointed out that your video is full of misinformation, and I pointed out one example: that you believe jeezuz came back from the dead...

The difference between you and I is that I believe things based on evidence, and you believe them without it.

This video is intellectual vandalism.

Btw, I don't know why you keep telling me that "atheism is a religion", since I havent even commented on that part of your video... stay on topic.

[CAnswersTV]

"Ojoreakatheoj" your comments are false & this latest comment of yours is not only false but pure intellectual vandalism known in the laws of logic as BEGGING THE QUESTION (making an assertion that needs to be proven). What is fun about debating religious Atheists is that they fail miserably at logical concepts because they are BLIND to their own philosophical weaknesses. Your denial that Jesus did not rise from the dead does not prove your proposition. Your presumption is false & invalid.

[ojoreakatheoj]

@CAnswersTV

Lol what? It's as if you're pulling random arguments you like out of nowhere. You should try reading what I've written. I haven't asserted anything, and you still don't know anything about what I believe in terms of theism.

I'm saying that you're full of rubbish, and there is so much rubbish in this video that it's not worth refuting comprehensively. So, I only point out one blaring bit of nonsense... that you believe jeezy-wheezy came back from the dead. Prove it.

[CAnswersTV]

Once again your comment here here is illogical & false ojoreakatheoj! You say you "haven't asserted anything"!? But go back & read your own comments, YOU HAVE ASSERTED PLENTY! Just based on what you (& your YOUTUBE account) say, it is easy to see that you are not a Christian, Muslim, Hindu or offshoot sects of these. Your educational background indicates "evolution" as your science & metaphysical rationalism/skepticism/existen­tialism as your religious philosophy. Prophecy proves Jesus rose.

[ojoreakatheoj]

LOL. How is it illogical and false to ask you to prove that jeezus came back from the dead?

Prove it.

You say "Prophecy proves Jesus rose"

LOL, is there a reason they don't teach this in public schools? I'm asking you. My guess is that they don't teach jeezus resurrection in schools because it's unsubstantiated mythology.

Prove it. Prooooooove it.

[CAnswersTV]

@ojoreakatheoj As typical atheists do, you completely ignore WHY I was saying your comment was ILLOGICAL & FALSE by PRETENDING my point was on something else ( RED HERRING). You're AFRAID to DECLARE your own BELIEF SYSTEM OUTRIGHT since you already KNOW that it has LESS going for it than CHRISTIANITY which has plenty of EVIDENCE to support it (see our websites: BIBLEQUERY ORG & HISTORYCART COM) which REFUTES your "unsubstantiated mythology" TRIPE! Over 300 Bible prophecies prove resurrection.

[ojoreakatheoj]

@CAnswersTV

Alright, you're dillusional... You're not even talking anymore. You're just writing in a lot of capital letters.

You believe some unbelievable and unsubstantiated things without any evidence to support them. How is that a good thing?

[CAnswersTV]

@ojoreakatheoj The only one "dillusional" is you since you act as if I have said nothing. My last comment alone gave you 2 of our 3 websites which are packed with years of research dealing with the very things you say are "unsubstantiated" & "without any evidence." Yours are the "unsubstantiated" comments. Please point out to me on either BIBLEQUERY ORG or HISTORYCART COM just WHAT is "without any evidence to support" (cite page)? While you're at it, read "Evidence that Demands a Verdict."

[ojoreakatheoj]

@CAnswersTV

No. You didn't provide any links actually. And even if you did, that's a poor job in making an argument. We all know that those bogus creation "science" websites are scoffed at and refuted by actual scientists.

[CAnswersTV]

@ojoreakatheoj "Links"? What are you talking about?! I never gave you any "links" just 2 of our 3 websites, BIBLEQUERY ORG & HISTORYCART COM. It's up to you to take these two website names & put them in a web search on YAHOO or GOOGLE & then click on the sites when the search pages appear. These sites provide EVIDENCE for CHRIST'S RESURRECTION. If you want a CREATION SCIENCE site then go to ANSWERSINGENESIS ORG which has support from many "ACTUAL SCIENTISTS." GROSS GENERALIZATION by you!

[ojoreakatheoj]

@CAnswersTV

Ok... I wasted some time looking through the creationist websites you linked me to... These are not credible sources... try an acredited scientific journal like Nature or Pubmed etc. Some random creationist websites are not convincing.

[CAnswersTV]

@ojoreakatheoj I'm proud of you though! You may have "wasted" time (& possibly not more than 30 minutes in a less than half-hearted way) but at least you did something that most people in their entire lives will never do. Once again your comment here is a logical fallacy called HASTY GENERALIZATION since I have files in my office going back 20 years for organizations like the Institute for Creation Research documenting hundreds of bona fide sources & scientists. Our webmaster has a Ph.D. also.

[ojoreakatheoj]

@CAnswersTV

Alright, we've reached a fundamental disagreement. I will not be convinced by any source you provide that isn't accredited-- That means your source has to meet specific criteria set by the larger scientific community. Journals like Nature and Pubmed have met these standards.

[CAnswersTV]

I enjoyed talking with you ojoreakatheoj & have tried to show you & readers why your arguments are based on (& continue to be) based on LOGICAL FALLACIES predicated on your wishful religion of ATHEISM. You CANNOT PROVE THAT GOD DOES NOT EXIST nor will you ever be able to. When you stand before GOD on judgement day you will tell HIM HE IS NOT THERE BECAUSE HE IS NOT "ACCREDITED" by your religious EVOLUTION "scientism" books. Alchemy & a flat earth would have been your "science" 500 years ago.

[richdorks73]

Irresponsible twit! God obviously has come up with a great way to naturally select the stupid. God has given us the cure to death in the bible and religion?

How can you people look in the mirror. This is horrible stuff. Have you not considered the consequences of your actions.

[CAnswersTV]

"richdorks73" are you referring to yourself as a "irresponsible twit" by supposing that you have been naturally selected to be "stupid"? Based on what you are saying here that conclusion seems to have great merit. You apparently have no sense of logical thought processes (could this be termed "stupidity'?). You make statements without verification of the validity of your argument (you seem to be at a loss). Have you considered the consequences of appearing "stupid" in front of the public eye?

[salerio61]

So, Stephen Gould refuses to debate does he? I wonder if that is because he's been dead getting on for 10 years.

[CAnswersTV]

@salerio61 For your information, this video was shot in 1991 so the information given was correct afterall, wasn't it? Answering this one was fun in a way because it reflects the situation you will find yourself in upon your death. You will have spent your entire earthly life believing your evolutionary fairytales but upon your death you will discover God was real afterall!  2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 says God sends "delusion" on unbelievers so they'll believe "a lie" & the penalty is damnation.

[SPACKlick]

Lies very often

Apparent limited understanding of science and education

Limited understanding of the evidene for evolution

quote mining

Distortion of punctuated equilibrium

Nothing new here

[CAnswersTV]

SPACElick it is unclear what you are talking about here. Why are you making declarative statements without documenting or proving your points? Is it because your atheistic religiousity is being threatened by the scientific evidence being presented? Are you, as so many religionists are apt to do, running into a psychological state of denial simply because Dr Girouard is trampling on your keenly held religious beliefs about how you came to be on this planet? Can it be your hidden fear within?

[FirebrandNIRE]

Great stuff!