Common chimps (Pan troglodytes West and Central Africa) and bonobos (Pan paniscus forests of the Democratic Republic of the Congo) taxonomic classifications are that they are separate species.
Even though chimps and bonobos are a separate species, they are closer morphologically, genetically, and behaviorally to one another than sub Saharan Congoids, Capoids and pygmies are to the more highly evolved and intelligent European Cro magnonxNeanderthal types.
whatever stupidity makes u feel better, but yu will have to explain why Microsoft, google, Glodman sachs, Apple, recruit black people in big numbers....oh dear.. your racist world cracking... again... lol ironically you would NEVER make it to work for these SUPERFIRMS because of your low intellect as well as your racist bigotry. hilarious comedy.. come again..
@Raybanmonster they recruit blacks only because of enforced "diversity" policy and because of their desire to squeeze out the white majority as part of their ongoing racial agenda.They do NOT recruit them because of merit or because they are the equals of their white counterparts.
@IwontConform So what your saying is that in Europe without that policy, we wouldnt find black people in these firms? Phwahahahaa WE FIND MORE!! America still has PROBLEMS despite the policy. ALSO What about you? I can tell you are unlikely to be recruited by these firms. If black intellect was AS RUSHDEN CLAIMED WE WOULD HAVE NOT A SINGLE BLACK PERSON ATTENDING UNIVERSITY BECAUSE THE INTELLECT WOULDNT BE HIGH ENOUGH, IN TRUTH esp AFRICANS Flood many Universities u racist
@IwontConform Youre unbelievable low brow quality of thinking ignores the people who affect recruiting like YOU!! and then you blame the lack of job uptake on the black people themselves .. unbelievably hilarious cock eyed thinking. They recruit them in big numbers... go to these firms on Wall street, go to APPLE Google Facebook and see them working with white and Asian highly educated people.. its not enough but it is SIGNIFICANT and POO POOS everything RUSHDEN CLAIMS.
@ApeFace90210 sure.. anything you say, if you did your homework youd realise the creator of the IQ test believes these so called results of Rushdens are failures because the sampling error is so great it is beyond any reason, but you wouldnt know that, because ironically your intellect is low.
what's more important for now is avoiding inflaming the territorial rage of ignorant men who cannot think outside of their native brand of hierarchical mindset.
the international scientific community rejects this man because there is almost no way to be properly objective about race unless you're either totally enlightened or a beautiful genius with a mammoth wang. he is pointing in the right direction, but so can anyone with an open mind in a multicultural society. until they isolate genetic markers for the developmental endocrine profiles associated with the different ethnic personality-dispositions, it's see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.
But my broad point is NOT to say one "race" is more intelligent or even more inventive than the others. On the contrary, I don't believe in different races.
No serious molecular biologists would believe in different races. Regional geno- & phenotypic mutation & the perpetuation of such geno & phenotypes --- due to a combination of population pressure, isolation, sexual selection, adaptation to local environments, over many 1K's of years, etc. --- yes...
@HenryDavidT Now I understand more where you are coming from even though I disagree. I think you should be careful when you say "Greece copied EVERYTHING from other civilizations", which is far from the case. Furthermore, I agree with what is said in these videos about human intelligence. The Northeast Asians have slightly higher IQs compared to Europeans but they have failed to invent as much by a long shot. Any book on the history of science focuses on Europe mostly for a reason.
@tigerfish03 "Any book on the history of science focuses on Europe mostly for a reason."
The "reason" is INCIDENTAL, although hard for ordinary people to understand (they think like you do: that W. Euroupeans *MUST* have something unique). Europeans HAPPENED to *return* to bear the torch of science at a juncture in history where the really systematized mathematics developed by Newton & Leibniz WERE necessary at that point, a time RECORDING (paper, press mechanics, etc.) was well developed.
@tigerfish03 Let me give you an absolutely relevant example, using greats like Newton & Leibniz, two men who developed "analytic geometry" independently:
There's a reason why calculus is also called ANALYTIC GEOMETRY: it is simply to take the analysis of the field of mathematics of GEOMETRY to the next, logical level. Geometry & Algebra (& a bit later, what we would call trigonometry) HAD BEEN in development helter-skelter, back & forth, in the Middle East and Greece for hundreds of years.
What the Arabs & Hindu scholars (Hindus were the ones who invented the "arabic" numeration/positional number system; the Arabs improved on it & the West copied it) laid down, the Greeks took it to the next level. When Rome sacked Greece &, within 400 years, ushered in the Dark Ages, it's AGAIN up to the Arabs to bear the torch alone in keeping the records of math & science.
Newton HAD ALL that mathematical tradition; he did NOT invent calculus out of the blue, despite popular misconceptions.
NO ONE questions Newton's exceptionally brilliance. He's one of the truly mostly exceptional humans ever lived (he and Leibniz), there's no question about it, when it comes to seeing the PATTERNS of nature.
But, please, notice: in Newton & Leibniz's time, mide 1600-early 1700s, Chemistry was still ABSOLUTELY ALCHEMY, not well developed like Geometry & Algebra (& Engineering, the one branch of science the Romans were really good practitioners).
The REASON Newton believed the earth was 6K years old was that he had NO concrete knowledge of *ordinary* chemicals, much less fusion, fission, tectonics, or nucleosysnthesis, all of which won't become systematized until the early 1900's.
He worked on optics & math, because he COULD. His brilliance ALLOWED him to put together the necessary components to *invent* calculus. But where the PATTERNS of nature were different, or out of his inclination, he's just as useless as the next person.
His work is reliable, but he goes a little over board talking about how great the Chinese are. Does he not realize that the only reason the Chinese MIGHT (not "definately will" as he puts it) have a man on the moon is because they learned from our technology? Then he has the nerve to talk about how they have potential to surpass us. Sure they have higher IQs but they have proven to fail at inventing things.
From the 18th-21st centuries, China DID "learn from" the west, yes. But before Newton, Jobs, IBM, or NASA, the Chinese contributed MANY more fundamental discoveries & inventions to human civilization than Europeans.
You'd say "Paper?, stirrup?, compass?, printing?, gun powder? Pha, those old things are child's play!" But for THOUSANDS of years, NO ONE had the brain power to make them. And those old investions STILL are, today, more fundamental to human civilization than Google or the iPad.
@HenryDavidT Paper was developed in different forms by many civilizations. It is said in some sources that Europeans developed the compass independently from China. The Greeks had gun powder by the way. And I think your statement about all of this being more important than what Europeans have developed is quite subjective. In any case, Europeans overall have proven to be more creative and inventive on many levels going back to Greece, doing more to create the modern world.
@tigerfish03 Greece was a very exceptional STUDENT; but it did NOT come up with Geometry, Astronomy, & Architecture on its own. Virtually ALL of them (e.g. the exquisitely COLUMNATED designs supremely displayed in the Parthenon) were copied from the ancient civilizations like the Egyptians... EXACTLY like the WEST has done in the last 800 years: being able to expound on & make extremely good use of fundamental inventions & discoveries made by Arabs, Hindus, & Chinese.
@HenryDavidT Greece's contributions to math alone outnumber those of any of those other civilizations you list. I find it funny that you mention arabs when that is the group that Rushton here coins with a low IQ. There were many Indo-European tribes in the Middle East at one time, you know, such as the Persians who made most of the math developments that arabs are given credit for. You exaggerate the forms of architecture that Greece learned from Egypt.
@tigerfish03 As the great Newton paraphrase what others said before him: it is ALWAYS easier when you're standing on the shoulders of giants (or just sturdy legged farmers) who came before you.
There is NO exaggeration about the indispensable contribution of Arab mathematics & astronomy. And, yes, Greece COPIED virtually all of their ideas from their neighbors: if you visited Egyt & look at their eye-popping (although less refined) columns, you'd know how/where Greece got its ideas from...
I'm not loving Arabs & hating Europeans/Greece. In fact, I agree classical Greece defined, in the highest degree, what humans could achieve within a few hundred years. They took science & mathematics to the next level, no question.
I'm Asian, pale and straight hair, descended from the people who split from the old Central Asians folks WHO gave rise to BOTH modern Western Europeans and East Asians.
But Arabs contributed to math & astronomy in two different ways and phases:
First, through interacting with ANCIENT civilizations, from Egypt to India, the Arabs served, when there's very little going on in Northern Europe or far East Asia, as the conduit for HUMAN development.
Second & much later -- towards the latter part of secular Rome, in which the "Holy Roman Empire" started dominating, ushering in the various phases of the Dark Ages of Europe -- only the Arabs kept the math advanced by the Greeks alive; W. Europe didn't pick up the torch again until the 1500s.
@tigerfish03 "Paper was developed in different forms by many civilizations."
Please, show ONE form of paper --- made by Europeans or any other --- before or around the time the Chinese discovered the process of making paper-thin paper from refined wood/bamboo pulps (the EXACT process we use today to make paper).
Parhments like skin & cloth; pyparus scroll; stone & mud tablets, hey're all over the world, yes. But NO body outside of China made paper-thin writing material before the Chinese.
Maslows Hierarchy of needs clearly explains the apparent IQ imbalance on the surface between racial groups.. Black people are black because its an adaptation to avoid genetic damage from harful uv rays., this means the sun is hot and in the heat where the rain doesnt come you are not going to invent much when you are thirsty and looking for food and water. also it explains why chaotic lives in the urban areas produce underachievement. Its amazing these speakers have an audience
The lid has been nailed shut on this debate. To learn about the exacting science of this matter, and to find out more, google this exact phrase in quotes:
"A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race differences in average IQ are largely genetic."
(from Psychology, Public Policy and Law, a journal of the American Psychological Association)
WE ARE STILL AWAITING YOUR FACTUAL SOURCE FOR YOUR OUTLANDISH RACIST EMOTIONAL BIOLOGICAL CLAIMES. LOLOL EVERY SINGLE RACIST CLOWN THAT UTTERS NONSENSE IS A JACKASS EXTREME BECAUSE NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS BEEN ABLE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION THAT CORROBORATES WITH MEDICAL FACT. DOCTORS WILL NOT LIE ABOUT THE DIFFERENCES OBSERVED AMONGST HUMANS BECAUSE IT WOULD GO AGAINST THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH AND THEY WOULD BE STRUCK OFF FOR RISKING LIVES. THIS IS WHY I KNOW YOU ARE JUST A RACIST SKANK
Please replace "evidence" for false testimony unless you can provide for us here some kind of factual contribution FROM A CREDIBLE SOURCE just this once? lol
I do realize that Rushton uses some of the worst statistics ever seen, nut it doesn't mean that other, more reliable, studies might reach a similar conclusion.
Correct, although if you fiond ANY "more reliable" studies, we will be very very glad to hear them, why? Clever Black folks passing love facts, but please leave your hyperbole at the door in the same manner I decided it not right to address your white self as a Paedophile probability
after following the IQ/race debate for the last 10 years or so, its become quite obvious that its not that the evidence isnt there to support Rushtons argument, its that people are unwilling to look at this issue in an objective manner.
For the majority of people this issue cannot be looked at, without adding ones own subjective/emotional into the final result, in todays western culture it is seen as highly immoral to recognize any intelligence differences between the races.
After reading Biochemistry at University, it is obvious that there isnt a single shred of relevant evidence to back up anything he says.. If it is true then as a scientist he will first have to scientifically explain how on earth he tested or made scientifically sure he was testing a white balck Asian or Latino man. Answer: He cannot because there is no scientific definition, unless you think it science enough to look at someone and judge for yourself. lolol stupid dick head
Please stop claiming academic achievements that are clearly false.
If you really had studied biochemistry, or even opened a book on biology, you would know that race is a legitimate biological term along with species, families and so on.
Race is defined by two populations, who has distinct genetically divergent populations within the same species with relatively small morphological and genetic differences.
If you don't think that race is scientific, then I guess all dog are the same?
Firstly: The basic biological "scientific" definition is, "genetically divergent groups with common phenotypic traits"
Those working in biomedical research clearly understand that humans fit into distinct groups that share heritable traits, the most obvious being skin colour or skeletal differences, the list goes on.....hence the growth in race based medicine.
Secondly, you clearly proved my point with your last comment, your not looking at this issue objectively.
1. That is not a scientific definition of a race, that is an approximate description of the TERM RACE. lolol
2. There is no "race based medicine", I know this because I was once one of those biomedical researchers dude.
3. skin colour and skeletal differences are not between them genetically linked. this is why some black people are short, and some white people have curly hair.
4.I am way ahead of you and Rushton regarding objectivity, no medical Doctor in the world believes it
Phwahahahaha so let me get this right RUSHTON , you believe certain races more intelligent do you? SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN HUH? please define for us what a scientific term for a white person is, so we know HOW THESE SO CALLED IQ TESTS SELECTED FOR RACE. When you do I will show you the most backward walking Penis of all time. This is why last month NEW SCIENTIST completely poo pood' his work.YES NEW SCIENTIST. called it discredited Psuedo science.
Im not interested. you talk unbelievable nonsense. What an insult to your mothers wish to instill manners and culture into you.You wouldn't get 1 minute for any student debate contest and your English is abysmal. You are a Nigger in the true sense of the word, you do not own any white woman, and you are not related to any famous scientist of the past, neither is your intellect piquant or your looks superior, a black man runs the White House, & his wife the highest IQ first lady ever.
so what happened to you then? Do you have a degree? Are you in mensa? if not why does this subject interest you so? and what use is it in your daily life?
This subject interests me because I don't like living in a society plagued by low-intelligence minority groups who blame people like me for the problems they themselves cause.
You are not intelligent, why should the intellect of black people bother you? are you at the bottom of your class? or did a black guy take your Harvard place? Stupid jackass.. you sound like your spending time around stupid people, leading your weak feeble mind astray with utter rubbish.
Hmm... but lets be honest, you are still here, chasing me obsessed about my blackness talking about my character, physicality, intellect, questioning, probing, seeking engagement with me, I am not looking for you. You need this to be true because it gives you strength, but you can only choose to stay stupid for so long knowing the information you dread to read awaits your effort You are as stupid as you choose to be. shouting louder about shit does not turn it into Gold.
What's "blackness" got to do with anything? The issue is that populations with a low mean intelligence tend to create problems for themselves and those around them. How are you ever going to help solve these issues if you won't even admit they exist?
@twk373 The issue is that you are poorly educated so you jump to silly conclusions by filling in the gaps with nonsense and hyperbole. You are not logically driven you are emotionally driven, this causes you to appear not just racist but intensely bigoted too as you overlook common sense. You actually believe IQ comes before societal development in which case you will need to explain the difference economically between North and South Korea which despite genetic similarity is economically wide
It's plain that the only person here who bigoted and racist is you. That is why you rely on distractions and hyperbole to cloud the issue, while avoiding any semblance of facts or logic.
The simple fact is that all intelligence research shows that intelligence has a substantial genetic component. There is no research demonstrating that intelligence is purely environmental.
North Korea is communist totalitarian state. South Korea is free.
You are so lost... isnt the issue about a lack of genetics to explain any racial bias ragarding intelligence?
Do you respect New Scientist? I do. This month P38 "The 12 Pillars of Wisdom"
Quote"history is littered with disreputable ideas from phrenology and other Psuedoscientific ways of measuring intelligence to its flawed attempts to link it to race" unquote oct 2010.
No doubt you are now going to tell us NewScientist is a quack publication right?...
Of course New Scientist publishes *some* quack material. I mean, are you really seriously suggesting that I should care about some random article that just accidentally comments on race and intelligence?
Sorry, but the link between race and intelligence has been established beyond a shadow of a doubt. There are NO scholars ANYWHERE who will dispute that there is an intelligence gap between blacks and whites.
What evidence do you have that I'm not intelligent? Fact is, I'm very intelligent. Sorry!
Black people bother me because they have created a culture of crime and poverty that negatively affects me and others. This is actually very easy to understand; that you require it to be explained suggests that it's you who's weak-minded and stupid.
IT firm. First programming language BBC micro, then BBC and then onto aspects of C although these days I do not programme I provide IT servivces to the biggest Manufacturers silly cunt.
I was head boy ogf my "white " school, and you are so jealous you cannot accept the truth. or that my English is better tyhan yours. So tell us about you? Have you studied? No.. didnt think so, thats why you bury your head in the sand rather than debate properly with people. You are nothing.
BASIC is my first ever language. I have two degrees. I run my own trading company and trade futures and Options. My degree is in Biochemistry and my masters in Business. If you call that language "jigaboo" so be it. Now what? Remember you are here chasing me, I am not chasing you, you are obsessed with who I am , what I do, what I look like, my intellect, genetics... but realise I am not interested in you or feel the need to publicly insult u
@DeSouzaPauloDeSouza is this what your life has come to? cussing black strangers like a drunk in the street shouting at a tree... a product of nature as if the tree stole his life... lolol. carry on.
@DeSouzaPauloDeSouza is this what your life has come to? cussing black strangers like a drunk in the street shouting at a tree... a product of nature as if the tree stole his life... lolol. if you have a daughter she will absolutely definately go with black guys because of your behaviour. She will wonder why and come to despise you in future when she realises your hatred was based on a personal embarrassing weakness.
@bananito3 I have a degree in Biochemistry from RHBNC London University and An MBA, I trade options and Futures on Commodities and run an IT firm with NADAQ and FTSE firms as my clients ass hole, and you are an embarrassment to decent people and you speak for a sick, disaffected imbalanced few. or do you believe I am chasing you all over the internet. Dont tell me, next youll be talking about the size of my black cock and who Im having sex with. Take a wash, grow some balls and get yr own gf
@bananito3 : you forgot one thing, the idiot(B) who made choice to listen to this noise called hiphop just can not have high intelligence due to his environment(project's kid).
We are at 200th anniversary of Robert Schumann and my neighborhood school is appeasing black students to play whatever they like. We know that classical music is good for brain's development. I think even school teachers(mostly white) have low IQ to let these students play these monkey drum beats. Re: Nature vs nurture.
Dont be sorry, your the one obsessed with black issues talking like a rap star my wigger when you could be doing other things. I do not seek you but I appreciate the fact that whatever you say, you are here fussin over black people like a c list celebrity obsessed with the camera but actually himself not having all that much talent, charm style or wit, or are you an M.I.T grad or something? No.. didnt think so
However, you will find quite a few black men AND WOMEN, statistically enough to poo poo any racist claim you make Im afraid. If my memory serves me right, I believe the former head of NASA (a BLACK MAN) went there, along with my cousin and two people I came to know in my professional life asshole. lolol.
To say whay you do clearly tells us you have not been to any university, its so funny bcos u r the joke
Why do the Eastern Europeans and Greeks have significantly lower IQ than Northern and Western Europe if they are all the same race? Why do the Irish in England have such low IQs? Why is it that blacks in america, who only have 10% white blood, have significantly higher IQs than sub-saharan Africans?
@Bomber0907 : let me say this (being fellow Cdn), prof.(?) Rushton was forced to take too many IQ tests by his parents which he progressively begin to ace. So he decided to make career out of this.
Only place IQ tests should be used where a person gone through brain surgery.
One of my fellow black engineer (20 yrs ago) was stopped by white cop on the highway who shows extreme surprise to learn Barry is Electronics Eng. working on a military project ! He is musician too; very good man he is !
Also, Rushton claims that having a higher IQ makes you less violent. This is not the case if you look at Bush, Stalin, or Hitler. Serial Killers are also very intelligent.
@Bomber0907 : He is saying that one could have more control over their negative emotions with a high IQ score. But I think he is being a reductionist surrounded by people who could finger certain people for criminal behavior based on these studies then pill pushing to remedy it.
Human behavior is very complex and is not just function of IQ score. We are again at a point when whites used Darwin's theory to label colored races as inferior for almost 150yrs and we know it's not true.
I want to know if the Africans they tested had ever attended school. Obviously, if you're a poor starving person who has never had the chance to educate yourself your result will be significantly lower than that of someone who has gone to school and had all the opportunities to learn without having to worry about things such as dying of starvation! How the hell can you really believe this to be accurate unless you know the background of the people they "tested"? I say it's all bullshit.
IQ is a bunch of nonsense fabricated by simpletons in an attempt to objectify a complex and subjective attribute known as intelligence. This measures the ability to perform simple mental tasks, which can be augmented by training and practice. IQ tests take no note of intuition and creativity, nor have any bearing on true intelligence. They have some relation to job success because only this simple minded interpretation is needed for repetitive and obedient tasks.
Nonsense? IQ doesn't prove anything. IQ tests only prove how well developed your abilities to solve mental problems are. Intelligence is totally subjective. Let's say person A scores 130 on the IQ test and person B scores 98 on an IQ exam but has far more knowledge of biology, astronomy, quantum physics, and chemistry than person A. Does having an IQ of 130 make person A smarter than B?
So you think an IQ test will catch the brilliance of a pianist, footballer, hall of fame gal, or Michael Angelo or the comic rhyming talent and showmanship of Mohammed Ali do you? You think the value and skill of your mother can be assessed by an IQ test if it came down to who lives and who dies last person on the space ship away from earth huh do you? Are you another white youthful male from the US?
@Bomber0907 : No wonder why only Japanese published his book; he made them look like top dogs at the food chain. They did harakiri in WWII so do Jihadis so they've high IQ too !
Creativity is more important than IQ score in my opinion as it allow one to be more productive in this information age. Yes, knowledge plays a role but processing the same in a useful manner in stressful situation is another thing.
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." AE.
@Bomber0907 Now you are arguing educational level vs natural intelligence level. If you were to take both of these people with their base natural intelligence level, with one being much higher than the other at birth. And give each the same kind of environmental training. The person with the higher IQ level would yield better results. This is what Rushton is arguing for. He states that he personally believes that intelligence is "50 percent genetic and 50 percent environmental".
@Bomber0907 "IQ is a bunch of nonsense fabricated by simpletons in an attempt to objectify a complex and subjective attribute known as intelligence."
Exactly. The whole concept of IQ is completely useless and every person with just basic knowledge and understanding of psychology (thereby excluding racists/nazis) knows that
The other reason why there is some relation to job success is because people who are able to do puzzles, patterns etc. better are probably going to earn more who can't do those things as well, even though those things are not important.
For example if I gave high schoolers addition and multiplication problems, and asked them to solve it, the ones who finish them the fastest and most accurate would probably earn the most. But those questions aren't important nor do they test intellect
@DEFACTO9 George Lucas, Maddona, Beckhams and Heidi Klum are WHITE. Obama & Hamilton HALF white. Others on the list include sportsmen like Jesse Owens and models Naomi Cambell, NOT the intelligent people. In other words DEFACTO9 your comment doesn't make sence.
@ceejaywt Yes, of courswe great people come from all over the world.If Enistein was born in the former Yugoslavia and didnt attend school for whatever reason, it is unlikely we would have known about his theories from him, it would have been someone else or a group of individuals arriving at the same.
@ceejaywt Can you not draw any conclusion from this list? Are you the sort of person who watched Avatar and couldnt understand the link between it and issues of todays technological society Vs rural indigenous populations around the world? Please, try to think deeper, do yourself some justice
@ceejaywt I knew you were not a thinker before and now I know you make silly stupid inferences without thinking things through. Every name on that list is there for a specific reason you stupid idiot. Learn to think more deeply. You're the kind of twit who watched Avatar and didnt realise its sub context regarding ethnicity and the irrelevance of technology compared to people and thier understanding of rural or simplified spiritual ways of life. Man, you're so backward, its so embarrassing
@DEFACTO9 Explain it to me PLEASE because I'm confused about the list. Also I understood Avatar but that was about the rights of indigenous people, it was not about race.
@ceejaywt wow, more stupidity. Avatar was absolutely about race.. with cooments like "blue monkeys"? search for Unobtanium? subjugation of a people by destruction of thier land? the fact that most of Navi actors were black? Phwahahahaha.. man you white Americans are just too much loololol
@DEFACTO9 I'm white British. This should not have been about Avatar! I am asking you what is the reason behind your list PLEASE explain because I'm not getting it.
@ceejaywt nO i WONT EXPLAIN IT. i WILL LEAVE YOU TO DO WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE YEARS AGO AND THAT IS DEVELOP A MODE OF DEEPER THINKING. tHE IRONY IS THAT YOU HAVE ARGUED ABOUT INTELLECT, AND HERE YOU ARE, A THICK IDIOT NOT GETTING aVATAR AND NOT JOINING THE DOTS EITHER WITH THE NAMES SHOWN.. iF YOU DONT GET EITHER, THEN YOU ARE TRAPPED AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY NO WONDER THAT YOU CANNOT THINK YOUR WAY OUT OF YOUR RACIST HELL
@DEFACTO9 The people who are in hell at the moment is low I.Q 3rd world people and without race being taken into account for a major cause of this those people will stay in that hell! All thanx to people like YOU! Perhaps you don't know why you made the list or perhaps you've just forgotten.
There is a problem here. In fact there are a lot, but I will address only one big one.
He looked for the smartest Africans among engineers. He has a bias. A misconception that the ability to perform well in math and science is a good measure of intelligence.
I disagree with this completely. There is a social intelligence which is far more relevant to humans.
Engineers can solve technical problems. Most problems in life are not technical. Most problems are social.
I consider intelligence the ability to consider the world around you as a whole. An awareness of one's surroundings and the ability to anticipate reactions of that surrounding to various actions.
I believe true intelligence is far more qualitative than quantitative.
@SepherStar : You are right on; many engineer shy away from social situations mainly because their training doesn't allow them to develop spiritual/emotional quotient parts of the intelligence matrix.
I broke out of this mold by expanding awareness of other disciplines. But my brother and a friend, both engineers also are stuck there and I can not get along with their "logical only" personality now. They both have serious family issues.
Prof.(?) PR is tool and puppet of some secret society.
I feel bad, I couldn't understand the problem even after the answer was given.
It's a pattern problem, the top left image is to the top right image as the bottom left image is to "what".
That wasn't clear to me. I thought the four shapes had to be somehow assembled or rearranged to come up with one of the images at the bottom.
The speaker was not clear at all about how to derive the answer to this very simple test problem. I had to use Wiki to look up "Raven's Progressive Matrices".
It's just funny that I didn't understand the instructions. I wasn't familiar with this TYPE of problem. The solution is simple once the problem structure is understood.
Common chimps (Pan troglodytes West and Central Africa) and bonobos (Pan paniscus forests of the Democratic Republic of the Congo) taxonomic classifications are that they are separate species.
Even though chimps and bonobos are a separate species, they are closer morphologically, genetically, and behaviorally to one another than sub Saharan Congoids, Capoids and pygmies are to the more highly evolved and intelligent European Cro magnonxNeanderthal types.
Taxonomy will prove this out soon.
OurCommunityStandard 1 week ago
whatever stupidity makes u feel better, but yu will have to explain why Microsoft, google, Glodman sachs, Apple, recruit black people in big numbers....oh dear.. your racist world cracking... again... lol ironically you would NEVER make it to work for these SUPERFIRMS because of your low intellect as well as your racist bigotry. hilarious comedy.. come again..
Raybanmonster 1 month ago
@Raybanmonster they recruit blacks only because of enforced "diversity" policy and because of their desire to squeeze out the white majority as part of their ongoing racial agenda.They do NOT recruit them because of merit or because they are the equals of their white counterparts.
IwontConform 3 weeks ago
@IwontConform So what your saying is that in Europe without that policy, we wouldnt find black people in these firms? Phwahahahaa WE FIND MORE!! America still has PROBLEMS despite the policy. ALSO What about you? I can tell you are unlikely to be recruited by these firms. If black intellect was AS RUSHDEN CLAIMED WE WOULD HAVE NOT A SINGLE BLACK PERSON ATTENDING UNIVERSITY BECAUSE THE INTELLECT WOULDNT BE HIGH ENOUGH, IN TRUTH esp AFRICANS Flood many Universities u racist
Raybanmonster 3 weeks ago
@IwontConform Youre unbelievable low brow quality of thinking ignores the people who affect recruiting like YOU!! and then you blame the lack of job uptake on the black people themselves .. unbelievably hilarious cock eyed thinking. They recruit them in big numbers... go to these firms on Wall street, go to APPLE Google Facebook and see them working with white and Asian highly educated people.. its not enough but it is SIGNIFICANT and POO POOS everything RUSHDEN CLAIMS.
Raybanmonster 3 weeks ago
@ApeFace90210 sure.. anything you say, if you did your homework youd realise the creator of the IQ test believes these so called results of Rushdens are failures because the sampling error is so great it is beyond any reason, but you wouldnt know that, because ironically your intellect is low.
Raybanmonster 1 month ago
@ApeFace90210 Phwahahahahahaahahaaaaa
Phwahahaahahahahahahahahaaaaaa Your intelect seems to be failing you. LMFAO!!
Raybanmonster 1 month ago
@ApeFace90210
YOU BEST GET ON WITH IT THEN AND STOP BOTHERING ME WITH BANALITIES
Raybanmonster 1 month ago
what's more important for now is avoiding inflaming the territorial rage of ignorant men who cannot think outside of their native brand of hierarchical mindset.
nerdyharry 4 months ago
the international scientific community rejects this man because there is almost no way to be properly objective about race unless you're either totally enlightened or a beautiful genius with a mammoth wang. he is pointing in the right direction, but so can anyone with an open mind in a multicultural society. until they isolate genetic markers for the developmental endocrine profiles associated with the different ethnic personality-dispositions, it's see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.
nerdyharry 4 months ago
But my broad point is NOT to say one "race" is more intelligent or even more inventive than the others. On the contrary, I don't believe in different races.
No serious molecular biologists would believe in different races. Regional geno- & phenotypic mutation & the perpetuation of such geno & phenotypes --- due to a combination of population pressure, isolation, sexual selection, adaptation to local environments, over many 1K's of years, etc. --- yes...
But different homo sapien races? No.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
@HenryDavidT Now I understand more where you are coming from even though I disagree. I think you should be careful when you say "Greece copied EVERYTHING from other civilizations", which is far from the case. Furthermore, I agree with what is said in these videos about human intelligence. The Northeast Asians have slightly higher IQs compared to Europeans but they have failed to invent as much by a long shot. Any book on the history of science focuses on Europe mostly for a reason.
tigerfish03 4 months ago
@tigerfish03 "Any book on the history of science focuses on Europe mostly for a reason."
The "reason" is INCIDENTAL, although hard for ordinary people to understand (they think like you do: that W. Euroupeans *MUST* have something unique). Europeans HAPPENED to *return* to bear the torch of science at a juncture in history where the really systematized mathematics developed by Newton & Leibniz WERE necessary at that point, a time RECORDING (paper, press mechanics, etc.) was well developed.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
@tigerfish03 Let me give you an absolutely relevant example, using greats like Newton & Leibniz, two men who developed "analytic geometry" independently:
There's a reason why calculus is also called ANALYTIC GEOMETRY: it is simply to take the analysis of the field of mathematics of GEOMETRY to the next, logical level. Geometry & Algebra (& a bit later, what we would call trigonometry) HAD BEEN in development helter-skelter, back & forth, in the Middle East and Greece for hundreds of years.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
What the Arabs & Hindu scholars (Hindus were the ones who invented the "arabic" numeration/positional number system; the Arabs improved on it & the West copied it) laid down, the Greeks took it to the next level. When Rome sacked Greece &, within 400 years, ushered in the Dark Ages, it's AGAIN up to the Arabs to bear the torch alone in keeping the records of math & science.
Newton HAD ALL that mathematical tradition; he did NOT invent calculus out of the blue, despite popular misconceptions.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
NO ONE questions Newton's exceptionally brilliance. He's one of the truly mostly exceptional humans ever lived (he and Leibniz), there's no question about it, when it comes to seeing the PATTERNS of nature.
But, please, notice: in Newton & Leibniz's time, mide 1600-early 1700s, Chemistry was still ABSOLUTELY ALCHEMY, not well developed like Geometry & Algebra (& Engineering, the one branch of science the Romans were really good practitioners).
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
The REASON Newton believed the earth was 6K years old was that he had NO concrete knowledge of *ordinary* chemicals, much less fusion, fission, tectonics, or nucleosysnthesis, all of which won't become systematized until the early 1900's.
He worked on optics & math, because he COULD. His brilliance ALLOWED him to put together the necessary components to *invent* calculus. But where the PATTERNS of nature were different, or out of his inclination, he's just as useless as the next person.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
@HenryDavidT
i ENJOYED READING YOUR POSTS. SO REFRESHING TO HEAR FROM SOMEONE WITH A BIT OF OBJECTIVITY, AND NOT RACIST STUPIDITY.
Raybanmonster 2 months ago
His work is reliable, but he goes a little over board talking about how great the Chinese are. Does he not realize that the only reason the Chinese MIGHT (not "definately will" as he puts it) have a man on the moon is because they learned from our technology? Then he has the nerve to talk about how they have potential to surpass us. Sure they have higher IQs but they have proven to fail at inventing things.
tigerfish03 4 months ago
From the 18th-21st centuries, China DID "learn from" the west, yes. But before Newton, Jobs, IBM, or NASA, the Chinese contributed MANY more fundamental discoveries & inventions to human civilization than Europeans.
You'd say "Paper?, stirrup?, compass?, printing?, gun powder? Pha, those old things are child's play!" But for THOUSANDS of years, NO ONE had the brain power to make them. And those old investions STILL are, today, more fundamental to human civilization than Google or the iPad.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
@HenryDavidT Paper was developed in different forms by many civilizations. It is said in some sources that Europeans developed the compass independently from China. The Greeks had gun powder by the way. And I think your statement about all of this being more important than what Europeans have developed is quite subjective. In any case, Europeans overall have proven to be more creative and inventive on many levels going back to Greece, doing more to create the modern world.
tigerfish03 4 months ago
@tigerfish03 Greece was a very exceptional STUDENT; but it did NOT come up with Geometry, Astronomy, & Architecture on its own. Virtually ALL of them (e.g. the exquisitely COLUMNATED designs supremely displayed in the Parthenon) were copied from the ancient civilizations like the Egyptians... EXACTLY like the WEST has done in the last 800 years: being able to expound on & make extremely good use of fundamental inventions & discoveries made by Arabs, Hindus, & Chinese.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
@HenryDavidT Greece's contributions to math alone outnumber those of any of those other civilizations you list. I find it funny that you mention arabs when that is the group that Rushton here coins with a low IQ. There were many Indo-European tribes in the Middle East at one time, you know, such as the Persians who made most of the math developments that arabs are given credit for. You exaggerate the forms of architecture that Greece learned from Egypt.
tigerfish03 4 months ago
@tigerfish03 As the great Newton paraphrase what others said before him: it is ALWAYS easier when you're standing on the shoulders of giants (or just sturdy legged farmers) who came before you.
There is NO exaggeration about the indispensable contribution of Arab mathematics & astronomy. And, yes, Greece COPIED virtually all of their ideas from their neighbors: if you visited Egyt & look at their eye-popping (although less refined) columns, you'd know how/where Greece got its ideas from...
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
I'm not loving Arabs & hating Europeans/Greece. In fact, I agree classical Greece defined, in the highest degree, what humans could achieve within a few hundred years. They took science & mathematics to the next level, no question.
I'm Asian, pale and straight hair, descended from the people who split from the old Central Asians folks WHO gave rise to BOTH modern Western Europeans and East Asians.
But Arabs contributed to math & astronomy in two different ways and phases:
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
First, through interacting with ANCIENT civilizations, from Egypt to India, the Arabs served, when there's very little going on in Northern Europe or far East Asia, as the conduit for HUMAN development.
Second & much later -- towards the latter part of secular Rome, in which the "Holy Roman Empire" started dominating, ushering in the various phases of the Dark Ages of Europe -- only the Arabs kept the math advanced by the Greeks alive; W. Europe didn't pick up the torch again until the 1500s.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
@tigerfish03 "Paper was developed in different forms by many civilizations."
Please, show ONE form of paper --- made by Europeans or any other --- before or around the time the Chinese discovered the process of making paper-thin paper from refined wood/bamboo pulps (the EXACT process we use today to make paper).
Parhments like skin & cloth; pyparus scroll; stone & mud tablets, hey're all over the world, yes. But NO body outside of China made paper-thin writing material before the Chinese.
HenryDavidT 4 months ago
Maslows Hierarchy of needs clearly explains the apparent IQ imbalance on the surface between racial groups.. Black people are black because its an adaptation to avoid genetic damage from harful uv rays., this means the sun is hot and in the heat where the rain doesnt come you are not going to invent much when you are thirsty and looking for food and water. also it explains why chaotic lives in the urban areas produce underachievement. Its amazing these speakers have an audience
Raybanmonster 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The lid has been nailed shut on this debate. To learn about the exacting science of this matter, and to find out more, google this exact phrase in quotes:
"A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race differences in average IQ are largely genetic."
(from Psychology, Public Policy and Law, a journal of the American Psychological Association)
thumbsdown4U 7 months ago
@ic1male80
WE ARE STILL AWAITING YOUR FACTUAL SOURCE FOR YOUR OUTLANDISH RACIST EMOTIONAL BIOLOGICAL CLAIMES. LOLOL EVERY SINGLE RACIST CLOWN THAT UTTERS NONSENSE IS A JACKASS EXTREME BECAUSE NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS BEEN ABLE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION THAT CORROBORATES WITH MEDICAL FACT. DOCTORS WILL NOT LIE ABOUT THE DIFFERENCES OBSERVED AMONGST HUMANS BECAUSE IT WOULD GO AGAINST THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH AND THEY WOULD BE STRUCK OFF FOR RISKING LIVES. THIS IS WHY I KNOW YOU ARE JUST A RACIST SKANK
Raybanmonster 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
deceptivedan 5 months ago
The white man marches on...and gives evidence.
ic1male80 1 year ago
@ic1male80 I haven't seen him give a shred of evidence yet; so far he's only made bald assertions (no sources).
polymath7 10 months ago
@ic1male80
Phwahahahahaaaaaaaa,
Please replace "evidence" for false testimony unless you can provide for us here some kind of factual contribution FROM A CREDIBLE SOURCE just this once? lol
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
I do realize that Rushton uses some of the worst statistics ever seen, nut it doesn't mean that other, more reliable, studies might reach a similar conclusion.
ryukXsayu27 1 year ago
@ryukXsayu27
Correct, although if you fiond ANY "more reliable" studies, we will be very very glad to hear them, why? Clever Black folks passing love facts, but please leave your hyperbole at the door in the same manner I decided it not right to address your white self as a Paedophile probability
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
after following the IQ/race debate for the last 10 years or so, its become quite obvious that its not that the evidence isnt there to support Rushtons argument, its that people are unwilling to look at this issue in an objective manner.
For the majority of people this issue cannot be looked at, without adding ones own subjective/emotional into the final result, in todays western culture it is seen as highly immoral to recognize any intelligence differences between the races.
Roguefox2006 1 year ago
@Roguefox2006
After reading Biochemistry at University, it is obvious that there isnt a single shred of relevant evidence to back up anything he says.. If it is true then as a scientist he will first have to scientifically explain how on earth he tested or made scientifically sure he was testing a white balck Asian or Latino man. Answer: He cannot because there is no scientific definition, unless you think it science enough to look at someone and judge for yourself. lolol stupid dick head
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
Please stop claiming academic achievements that are clearly false.
If you really had studied biochemistry, or even opened a book on biology, you would know that race is a legitimate biological term along with species, families and so on.
Race is defined by two populations, who has distinct genetically divergent populations within the same species with relatively small morphological and genetic differences.
If you don't think that race is scientific, then I guess all dog are the same?
lortelort 1 year ago
@lortelort
Phwahahahahaaa
Race is NOT a taxanomic subclass. dont even come here trying it you fucking racist he-hawing donkey. You silly arrogant white fuck
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
You use my race as an insult, and I'M the racist? :)
I take your insults as lack of arguments..
Have a nice day...
lortelort 1 year ago
@lortelort yes I will try to have an extraordinary day thank you
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
Firstly: The basic biological "scientific" definition is, "genetically divergent groups with common phenotypic traits"
Those working in biomedical research clearly understand that humans fit into distinct groups that share heritable traits, the most obvious being skin colour or skeletal differences, the list goes on.....hence the growth in race based medicine.
Secondly, you clearly proved my point with your last comment, your not looking at this issue objectively.
Roguefox2006 1 year ago 2
@Roguefox2006
1. That is not a scientific definition of a race, that is an approximate description of the TERM RACE. lolol
2. There is no "race based medicine", I know this because I was once one of those biomedical researchers dude.
3. skin colour and skeletal differences are not between them genetically linked. this is why some black people are short, and some white people have curly hair.
4.I am way ahead of you and Rushton regarding objectivity, no medical Doctor in the world believes it
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
/watch?v=HS97nqOnrFk
If Rushton is wrong, then why does realtiy reflect his findins so closely??????
awm4151 1 year ago
@awm4151 Because you are gullible enough to believe so
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
The highest measured African IQ they took was 103? This claim is highly suspect to me.
Keysteeze 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Phwahahahaha so let me get this right RUSHTON , you believe certain races more intelligent do you? SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN HUH? please define for us what a scientific term for a white person is, so we know HOW THESE SO CALLED IQ TESTS SELECTED FOR RACE. When you do I will show you the most backward walking Penis of all time. This is why last month NEW SCIENTIST completely poo pood' his work.YES NEW SCIENTIST. called it discredited Psuedo science.
Raybanmonster 1 year ago
People From Yugoslavia are just plain stupid . !
MrSaxonwarrior 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bananito3
I also think its time your account was removed.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@bananito3
Im not interested. you talk unbelievable nonsense. What an insult to your mothers wish to instill manners and culture into you.You wouldn't get 1 minute for any student debate contest and your English is abysmal. You are a Nigger in the true sense of the word, you do not own any white woman, and you are not related to any famous scientist of the past, neither is your intellect piquant or your looks superior, a black man runs the White House, & his wife the highest IQ first lady ever.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
mmm since the nigger couldnt keep the bluff, now he became suddenly not interested.
hahaha
knock it off pathetic shit stain.
XD
bananito3 1 year ago
If your IQ is 115 or above, you are more intelligent than 98% of American blacks. Fewer than a million American blacks score at this level.
twk373 1 year ago
@twk373
I think the nigger iq average is lower than that.
in contrast asians are the most intelligent fellows on this planet (average), whites next.
bananito3 1 year ago
@twk373
Phwahahahahahaaaaaa dude I think youll find fewer than 2% of people from ANY RACE score above 115 on an IQ test. What a jackass.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
Actually, 16% of whites score above 115. Close to 20% of east asians score above 115.
twk373 1 year ago
@twk373
so what happened to you then? Do you have a degree? Are you in mensa? if not why does this subject interest you so? and what use is it in your daily life?
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
This subject interests me because I don't like living in a society plagued by low-intelligence minority groups who blame people like me for the problems they themselves cause.
twk373 1 year ago
@twk373
You are not intelligent, why should the intellect of black people bother you? are you at the bottom of your class? or did a black guy take your Harvard place? Stupid jackass.. you sound like your spending time around stupid people, leading your weak feeble mind astray with utter rubbish.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
dont take it personal, shit stain
its a statistical fact, niggers are stupid, chimps are dumb as cardboard.
And now you are contributing to a new metric, niggers tend to live in denial when they find how dumb they are.
bananito3 1 year ago
@bananito3
Hmm... but lets be honest, you are still here, chasing me obsessed about my blackness talking about my character, physicality, intellect, questioning, probing, seeking engagement with me, I am not looking for you. You need this to be true because it gives you strength, but you can only choose to stay stupid for so long knowing the information you dread to read awaits your effort You are as stupid as you choose to be. shouting louder about shit does not turn it into Gold.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
What's "blackness" got to do with anything? The issue is that populations with a low mean intelligence tend to create problems for themselves and those around them. How are you ever going to help solve these issues if you won't even admit they exist?
twk373 1 year ago
@twk373 The issue is that you are poorly educated so you jump to silly conclusions by filling in the gaps with nonsense and hyperbole. You are not logically driven you are emotionally driven, this causes you to appear not just racist but intensely bigoted too as you overlook common sense. You actually believe IQ comes before societal development in which case you will need to explain the difference economically between North and South Korea which despite genetic similarity is economically wide
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
It's plain that the only person here who bigoted and racist is you. That is why you rely on distractions and hyperbole to cloud the issue, while avoiding any semblance of facts or logic.
The simple fact is that all intelligence research shows that intelligence has a substantial genetic component. There is no research demonstrating that intelligence is purely environmental.
North Korea is communist totalitarian state. South Korea is free.
twk373 1 year ago
@twk373
You are so lost... isnt the issue about a lack of genetics to explain any racial bias ragarding intelligence?
Do you respect New Scientist? I do. This month P38 "The 12 Pillars of Wisdom"
Quote"history is littered with disreputable ideas from phrenology and other Psuedoscientific ways of measuring intelligence to its flawed attempts to link it to race" unquote oct 2010.
No doubt you are now going to tell us NewScientist is a quack publication right?...
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
Of course New Scientist publishes *some* quack material. I mean, are you really seriously suggesting that I should care about some random article that just accidentally comments on race and intelligence?
Sorry, but the link between race and intelligence has been established beyond a shadow of a doubt. There are NO scholars ANYWHERE who will dispute that there is an intelligence gap between blacks and whites.
twk373 1 year ago
Im really not interested, please get this hint and move on. Stop harassing me.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
You're the one who needs to stop harassing me. It's not hard. Just stop.
twk373 1 year ago
@twk373 and a huge gap intelligence
bananito3 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
What evidence do you have that I'm not intelligent? Fact is, I'm very intelligent. Sorry!
Black people bother me because they have created a culture of crime and poverty that negatively affects me and others. This is actually very easy to understand; that you require it to be explained suggests that it's you who's weak-minded and stupid.
twk373 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DEFACTO9
Why are you so interested in this topic?
twk373 1 year ago
@bananito3
IT firm. First programming language BBC micro, then BBC and then onto aspects of C although these days I do not programme I provide IT servivces to the biggest Manufacturers silly cunt.
I was head boy ogf my "white " school, and you are so jealous you cannot accept the truth. or that my English is better tyhan yours. So tell us about you? Have you studied? No.. didnt think so, thats why you bury your head in the sand rather than debate properly with people. You are nothing.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
BBC micro is that a language? or a COMPUTER, stupid piece of a your mother chimp whore?
BTW do you know what language you need to program that old piece of shit computer?
could you write me some lines?
Do you want me to teach you?
and C? hahaha, i dont think i have ever known a chimp that knows even the basics of the old C language.
Its funny how every nigger owns a TI firm in youtube, but have no basic knowledge whatsoever
LOL
bananito3 1 year ago
@bananito3
no idiot, BBC is BASIC.!!!! llololol
and remember your the one who believes this nonsense
What an ass, we see right through you.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
you said language is BBC, wrong, now after your 24 hours of trying to understand wikipedia article on machine BBC you came with BASIC. fail
But i give you one chance, fucking irrelevant dumbass nigger:
Write some BASIC here, i know you dont know anything about any object oriented language like the old C, for you it is like learning rocket science.
so plz then write some basic jigaboo.
and yep i see right through you dark beast skin.
XD
bananito3 1 year ago
@bananito3
how childish.. believe what you want to
BASIC is my first ever language. I have two degrees. I run my own trading company and trade futures and Options. My degree is in Biochemistry and my masters in Business. If you call that language "jigaboo" so be it. Now what? Remember you are here chasing me, I am not chasing you, you are obsessed with who I am , what I do, what I look like, my intellect, genetics... but realise I am not interested in you or feel the need to publicly insult u
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
bla bla bla and more bla bla bla, so where is the BASIC instructions.
And where is the IT firm, the programming experience, are you now into biochemistry, what is next, are you going to be Obama's missing twin.
Knock it off pathetic buck boy, you wasted 1 day, but you still have 2 more.
Go ask any whiteboy under 12 years old, they learn BASIC @ school, they could save your nigger bluff.
Dont ask nigger kids, since nigger's school is prison.
bananito3 1 year ago
@bananito3
I like to discuss things with people at least half my age dude... sorry... Im just not going to engage..
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
Apocrine bromhidrosis is more common in patients in dark-skinned ethnic groups than in others. That's genetics too.
That's the reason the buggers like to splash on double doses of strong cologne.
I can smell one of them from 50 feet away if the wind is right.
for more information on their stench, google using search words: "emedicine" +"Bromhidrosis"+ "Author: Wingfield Rehmus, MD"
DeSouzaPauloDeSouza 1 year ago
@DeSouzaPauloDeSouza is this what your life has come to? cussing black strangers like a drunk in the street shouting at a tree... a product of nature as if the tree stole his life... lolol. carry on.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DeSouzaPauloDeSouza is this what your life has come to? cussing black strangers like a drunk in the street shouting at a tree... a product of nature as if the tree stole his life... lolol. if you have a daughter she will absolutely definately go with black guys because of your behaviour. She will wonder why and come to despise you in future when she realises your hatred was based on a personal embarrassing weakness.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DeSouzaPauloDeSouza
You are Bromhydrosiphobic. look that one up lolol
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@bananito3 I have a degree in Biochemistry from RHBNC London University and An MBA, I trade options and Futures on Commodities and run an IT firm with NADAQ and FTSE firms as my clients ass hole, and you are an embarrassment to decent people and you speak for a sick, disaffected imbalanced few. or do you believe I am chasing you all over the internet. Dont tell me, next youll be talking about the size of my black cock and who Im having sex with. Take a wash, grow some balls and get yr own gf
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 BTW what is NADAQ hahahaha niggers are plain stupid.
bananito3 1 year ago
@bananito3
are you 12?
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@bananito3 : you forgot one thing, the idiot(B) who made choice to listen to this noise called hiphop just can not have high intelligence due to his environment(project's kid).
We are at 200th anniversary of Robert Schumann and my neighborhood school is appeasing black students to play whatever they like. We know that classical music is good for brain's development. I think even school teachers(mostly white) have low IQ to let these students play these monkey drum beats. Re: Nature vs nurture.
Zeno1999 1 year ago
India's IQ is 85, but India has more intelligent kids than the US has kids.
Bomber0907 1 year ago
@Bomber0907 I prefer indians but no niggers
not even indians want niggers
they are a global disgrace
sorry nigger.
bananito3 1 year ago
@bananito3
Dont be sorry, your the one obsessed with black issues talking like a rap star my wigger when you could be doing other things. I do not seek you but I appreciate the fact that whatever you say, you are here fussin over black people like a c list celebrity obsessed with the camera but actually himself not having all that much talent, charm style or wit, or are you an M.I.T grad or something? No.. didnt think so
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9
MIT ? i love MIT
whats wrong with the MIT? do you think its "razzizt" because you wont find any niggers there?
well, its not a race thing, its an intelligence thing.
and how can you be intelligent if you waste half your life trying to refute my sporadic witty cmts.
Poor nigger.
bananito3 1 year ago
@bananito3 Phwahahahasaa,
lolYou will not find a single "niger" at M.I.T.
However, you will find quite a few black men AND WOMEN, statistically enough to poo poo any racist claim you make Im afraid. If my memory serves me right, I believe the former head of NASA (a BLACK MAN) went there, along with my cousin and two people I came to know in my professional life asshole. lolol.
To say whay you do clearly tells us you have not been to any university, its so funny bcos u r the joke
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
Why do the Eastern Europeans and Greeks have significantly lower IQ than Northern and Western Europe if they are all the same race? Why do the Irish in England have such low IQs? Why is it that blacks in america, who only have 10% white blood, have significantly higher IQs than sub-saharan Africans?
More reasons why Rushton's theories are bullshit.
Bomber0907 1 year ago
@Bomber0907 : let me say this (being fellow Cdn), prof.(?) Rushton was forced to take too many IQ tests by his parents which he progressively begin to ace. So he decided to make career out of this.
Only place IQ tests should be used where a person gone through brain surgery.
One of my fellow black engineer (20 yrs ago) was stopped by white cop on the highway who shows extreme surprise to learn Barry is Electronics Eng. working on a military project ! He is musician too; very good man he is !
Zeno1999 1 year ago
@Zeno1999
Also, Rushton claims that having a higher IQ makes you less violent. This is not the case if you look at Bush, Stalin, or Hitler. Serial Killers are also very intelligent.
Bomber0907 1 year ago
@Bomber0907 : He is saying that one could have more control over their negative emotions with a high IQ score. But I think he is being a reductionist surrounded by people who could finger certain people for criminal behavior based on these studies then pill pushing to remedy it.
Human behavior is very complex and is not just function of IQ score. We are again at a point when whites used Darwin's theory to label colored races as inferior for almost 150yrs and we know it's not true.
Zeno1999 1 year ago
I want to know if the Africans they tested had ever attended school. Obviously, if you're a poor starving person who has never had the chance to educate yourself your result will be significantly lower than that of someone who has gone to school and had all the opportunities to learn without having to worry about things such as dying of starvation! How the hell can you really believe this to be accurate unless you know the background of the people they "tested"? I say it's all bullshit.
closetbug 1 year ago
IQ seems to me a clumsy, yet still quite useful way of judging peoples intelligence
cveich 1 year ago
IQ is a bunch of nonsense fabricated by simpletons in an attempt to objectify a complex and subjective attribute known as intelligence. This measures the ability to perform simple mental tasks, which can be augmented by training and practice. IQ tests take no note of intuition and creativity, nor have any bearing on true intelligence. They have some relation to job success because only this simple minded interpretation is needed for repetitive and obedient tasks.
Bomber0907 1 year ago
@Bomber0907
Now THAT is a bunch of nonsense!
lortelort 1 year ago
@lortelort
Nonsense? IQ doesn't prove anything. IQ tests only prove how well developed your abilities to solve mental problems are. Intelligence is totally subjective. Let's say person A scores 130 on the IQ test and person B scores 98 on an IQ exam but has far more knowledge of biology, astronomy, quantum physics, and chemistry than person A. Does having an IQ of 130 make person A smarter than B?
Bomber0907 1 year ago
@Bomber0907
Person B might have more KNOWLEDGE than person A.
But person A has the potential to have more knowledge than person B, if exposed to it.
lortelort 1 year ago
@lortelort
So you think an IQ test will catch the brilliance of a pianist, footballer, hall of fame gal, or Michael Angelo or the comic rhyming talent and showmanship of Mohammed Ali do you? You think the value and skill of your mother can be assessed by an IQ test if it came down to who lives and who dies last person on the space ship away from earth huh do you? Are you another white youthful male from the US?
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@lortelort No, not neccesarily because you imply you understand intelligence, and we dont
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@Bomber0907 : No wonder why only Japanese published his book; he made them look like top dogs at the food chain. They did harakiri in WWII so do Jihadis so they've high IQ too !
Creativity is more important than IQ score in my opinion as it allow one to be more productive in this information age. Yes, knowledge plays a role but processing the same in a useful manner in stressful situation is another thing.
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." AE.
What a waste of my tax dollars !
Zeno1999 1 year ago
@Zeno1999
Exactly my point. Most inventors and innovators used creativity to design and engineer their projects.
Bomber0907 1 year ago
@Bomber0907 Now you are arguing educational level vs natural intelligence level. If you were to take both of these people with their base natural intelligence level, with one being much higher than the other at birth. And give each the same kind of environmental training. The person with the higher IQ level would yield better results. This is what Rushton is arguing for. He states that he personally believes that intelligence is "50 percent genetic and 50 percent environmental".
TheMedievalMan 1 year ago
@Bomber0907 You are a fucking retard
SPQRomantic 5 months ago
@Bomber0907 "IQ is a bunch of nonsense fabricated by simpletons in an attempt to objectify a complex and subjective attribute known as intelligence."
Exactly. The whole concept of IQ is completely useless and every person with just basic knowledge and understanding of psychology (thereby excluding racists/nazis) knows that
YouFailedAgain 1 year ago
@YouFailedAgain
These racialists/WN's desperately want to claim that having a high IQ makes you intelligent to justify their own lust for "racial superiority"
Bomber0907 1 year ago
Comment removed
bananito3 1 year ago
@Bomber0907
damn your are such a desperate racephobe
holding the egalitarism BS about to collapse.
EPIC FAIL.
bananito3 1 year ago
@Bomber
The other reason why there is some relation to job success is because people who are able to do puzzles, patterns etc. better are probably going to earn more who can't do those things as well, even though those things are not important.
For example if I gave high schoolers addition and multiplication problems, and asked them to solve it, the ones who finish them the fastest and most accurate would probably earn the most. But those questions aren't important nor do they test intellect
SuperGoat777 1 year ago
@Bomber0907
yEAH RIGHT NOBODY IS SMARTER THAN ANYBODY ELSE WE'RE ALL THE SAME GOOD THINKING GENIUS.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DEFACTO9 George Lucas, Maddona, Beckhams and Heidi Klum are WHITE. Obama & Hamilton HALF white. Others on the list include sportsmen like Jesse Owens and models Naomi Cambell, NOT the intelligent people. In other words DEFACTO9 your comment doesn't make sence.
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 Are you saying that great people come from all over the world? This video is about race and intelligence!
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt Yes, of courswe great people come from all over the world.If Enistein was born in the former Yugoslavia and didnt attend school for whatever reason, it is unlikely we would have known about his theories from him, it would have been someone else or a group of individuals arriving at the same.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 Hey have you looked at my channel yet?
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 It would have probably been anouther jew that would have done what Einstein did?
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 I'll ask you again why have you mentioned all these people.
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt Can you not draw any conclusion from this list? Are you the sort of person who watched Avatar and couldnt understand the link between it and issues of todays technological society Vs rural indigenous populations around the world? Please, try to think deeper, do yourself some justice
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 Alot of those people arn't black (Beckhams) and some of them are sports stars.
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt I knew you were not a thinker before and now I know you make silly stupid inferences without thinking things through. Every name on that list is there for a specific reason you stupid idiot. Learn to think more deeply. You're the kind of twit who watched Avatar and didnt realise its sub context regarding ethnicity and the irrelevance of technology compared to people and thier understanding of rural or simplified spiritual ways of life. Man, you're so backward, its so embarrassing
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 Explain it to me PLEASE because I'm confused about the list. Also I understood Avatar but that was about the rights of indigenous people, it was not about race.
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt wow, more stupidity. Avatar was absolutely about race.. with cooments like "blue monkeys"? search for Unobtanium? subjugation of a people by destruction of thier land? the fact that most of Navi actors were black? Phwahahahaha.. man you white Americans are just too much loololol
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 I'm white British. This should not have been about Avatar! I am asking you what is the reason behind your list PLEASE explain because I'm not getting it.
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt nO i WONT EXPLAIN IT. i WILL LEAVE YOU TO DO WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE YEARS AGO AND THAT IS DEVELOP A MODE OF DEEPER THINKING. tHE IRONY IS THAT YOU HAVE ARGUED ABOUT INTELLECT, AND HERE YOU ARE, A THICK IDIOT NOT GETTING aVATAR AND NOT JOINING THE DOTS EITHER WITH THE NAMES SHOWN.. iF YOU DONT GET EITHER, THEN YOU ARE TRAPPED AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY NO WONDER THAT YOU CANNOT THINK YOUR WAY OUT OF YOUR RACIST HELL
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 The people who are in hell at the moment is low I.Q 3rd world people and without race being taken into account for a major cause of this those people will stay in that hell! All thanx to people like YOU! Perhaps you don't know why you made the list or perhaps you've just forgotten.
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt Phwahahahahaaaaa
still you cant work it out? Phwahahahahaaa. I have yet to meet a racist person like you who was balanced and intelligent... simply doesnt exist.
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
@DEFACTO9 Why have you mentioned all these people?
ceejaywt 1 year ago
@ceejaywt
If you really have to ask your not thinking hard enough
DEFACTO9 1 year ago
There is a problem here. In fact there are a lot, but I will address only one big one.
He looked for the smartest Africans among engineers. He has a bias. A misconception that the ability to perform well in math and science is a good measure of intelligence.
I disagree with this completely. There is a social intelligence which is far more relevant to humans.
Engineers can solve technical problems. Most problems in life are not technical. Most problems are social.
SepherStar 1 year ago
@SepherStar
I consider intelligence the ability to consider the world around you as a whole. An awareness of one's surroundings and the ability to anticipate reactions of that surrounding to various actions.
I believe true intelligence is far more qualitative than quantitative.
SepherStar 1 year ago
@SepherStar : You are right on; many engineer shy away from social situations mainly because their training doesn't allow them to develop spiritual/emotional quotient parts of the intelligence matrix.
I broke out of this mold by expanding awareness of other disciplines. But my brother and a friend, both engineers also are stuck there and I can not get along with their "logical only" personality now. They both have serious family issues.
Prof.(?) PR is tool and puppet of some secret society.
Zeno1999 1 year ago
bla...blaaa....
DisturbedlllTheBest 2 years ago
@Entanglement9 oh ya, go tell him, not me..
babanachiket 2 years ago
@babanachiket ok understood..
Entanglement9 2 years ago
My proffessor told me that indians have the highest IQ in the world. what type of research has he done ?
babanachiket 2 years ago
LOL! i take it that your professor is indian...
CrackerJackLee 2 years ago
@ 6:00
I feel bad, I couldn't understand the problem even after the answer was given.
It's a pattern problem, the top left image is to the top right image as the bottom left image is to "what".
That wasn't clear to me. I thought the four shapes had to be somehow assembled or rearranged to come up with one of the images at the bottom.
The speaker was not clear at all about how to derive the answer to this very simple test problem. I had to use Wiki to look up "Raven's Progressive Matrices".
SBRslacker00 2 years ago
Just tilt it 45 degrees and change the color as in the example shown in the first line...
daNorse 2 years ago
No, I get it.
It's just funny that I didn't understand the instructions. I wasn't familiar with this TYPE of problem. The solution is simple once the problem structure is understood.
SBRslacker00 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Phil how sweet you used to be
goldenrightsjustice 2 years ago
Phil how sweet you used to be
goldenrightsjustice 2 years ago