we all come from Adam an Eve an if we wr related to apes dont u think there wld b a ape baby in the world ? im so sick of this have evolution dudes stop trying to confuse people we were all made from adam an eve
@back2nez You obviously don't understand what evolution is. Evolution cannot be denied, because it is fact. It is a change in the gene pool of a population over time. We have seen this happen with our own eyes, for goodness sake. Educate yourself before you post such ignorance. Your Adam & Eve story is is not based on logic, reasoning or data, unlike evolution.
They always make it out that an ape got up one day and walked as though it was some conscious decision. They should emphasize that walking upright evolved and took generations to happen and happened because those that did walk upright tended to survive long enough and pass on there genes.
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.
people are not interested in finding out our origins...instead they are more interested in kissing the popes ass or blowing them selves up for 72 virgins or cluster bombing civilians...we demonize killing criminals when they kill their own family more than others,,,well,that's what we doing every day.
These creationist trolls are ridiculous... Don't feed them guys please, if they want to debate they will have to do much more studying and educate themselves further.
Very interesting fairy tale making by atheist... believe all but trust none. human is a perfect creation from GOD. Intelligent is evidence of difference between us and animal. We not an animal.
@batestiaful can you enlighten us and explain which creator you're referring to? cuz honestly there's a wide range of claims in this regard yet scientific findings disagree with all of them...so...who's the "Creator" that you have in mind?
@selebet77 Human beings are as imperfect as the hypothetical God you claim designed us...how do u explain the existence of muscles and bones and organs in our bodies that we don't use any more?
If you are a truth seeker, go to Truthcontest(dot)com and open the Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this, what it says will turn this world right side-up if it reaches enough people in time. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
Nearly every instance here, someone was about to give up and "got a hunch" or heard a voice, then went on to make a major discovery. Really lazy writing of the reconstructions and far too much time spent on the Piltdown hoax.
No mention of; h. rudolphensis, h. antecessor, h. hiedelbergensis, h. ergaster, denisovans etc. The BBC's effort "Walking with Caveman" is much more comprehensive.
@SinisterAngel1 Genetic similarity is a fact, it doesn't matter if due to common ancestry or "intelligent" creation: it still indicates a common, similar nature. Just like a Porsche and a VW Beetle are undoubtedly related due to a common creator, even if we had a creator the fact would remain that we are related to chimps, rats and avocados no matter what.
@linghun 98% identical yet where light years ahead in differences. we are all made from the dust of the earth, breath the same air, eat the same food, where bound to be similar.
@linghun No, we share a common creator not an ancestor....if that is the case clouds are 100% water, jelly fish are 98% water, and watermelons are 97% water. Does this prove they a evolved from an ancestor?
@batestiaful Then tell me when did this creator create life? When was each species created, and where? Was the first of a species created adult or infant? Was the chicken created before or after the egg? Did the first of each mammal have a navel, and why? How do you explain the fossil record? Please point to scientific research supporting your view.
@linghun Are you trying to state that clouds are not water? Or Jelly Fish are not water?? Fossil record??? Oh you mean Lucy? The scientific bunk that was proven false but none other than scientists themselves. You do know that carbon dating is also not an exact science as well right? No of course not, but you believe the bunk posted on You Tube. Can you tell me when science stated when life began? Can science state what was the first species? Has science stated if the first animals had navels?
@batestiaful No, I am honestly asking you to answer those questions: when did the creator create life? When was each species created, and where? Was the first of a species created adult or infant? Was the chicken created before or after the egg? Did the first of each mammal have a navel, and why? How do you explain the fossil record? You can elaborate.
Oh, and I'm trying to watch every video in the channel which is several hours; besides one of the dramatizations of Darwin's life, I've never seen any of the others before. So, thank you very very much for this work. Regardless of how limited I might find any one video, I'm am massively grateful to you for doing the work to make these available. Thank you, thank-you, thank you. I love people who make my brain explode!
Everything is a tool of the brain and the outer brain is the tool of the Limbic brain; the most poorly understood system in modern science. No matter what we did or grew from the hair roots to the toe nails, everything we did with our hands or feet, were all expressions of the goal states or the result of the global behavior generated our of the Limbic brain; the source and fabric of consciousness.
How long does it take to change a brain from monitoring for danger from below, shedding that trait while keeping the critical ability to recognize the origin of a sound as coming from either level with the head or above the head; danger from above? How much evolutionary time is required to rewire the entire brains auditory system from the internal wiring to the vestigialization of the lower lobe?
It's sad that they didn't mention or deal with the genetic evidence showing our divergence from chimps at 6.6 mya. Also, they did not show us Lucy's teeth, hip bone configuration, or her feet. What differentiated us from the chimp solution to life with a jungle. It's obvious that our species had done something different enough for reproductive divergence from the chimp linage. Note the human ear lobe, the vestigial lobe indicating a change from when the lower ear was important. Now its not!
@mikieginokc1 The Lucy "theory" was prove false.....just another species of primate "ape". If "evolution" occurs in a species, shouldn't all of the species evolve at the same time and not just a certain sect of it? Such as apes to human theory, why does the evolutionist believe that humans evolved from a species of apes, yet, have no explanation as to why the theory didn't apply to all of the species? Because it never happened.
Some of the politically inspired resistance to Darwinism in human affairs comes from evolutionary scientists themselves. By overemphasizing the search for universals, that is, pan-human traits (partly to show people's commonalities), many evolutionists abandon the very comparative method that created the Darwinian Revolution in the first place. Ignoring or minimizing the role of heritable variation goes against the two basic postulates of Darwinian theory. Go to CHARLESDARWINRESEARCHORG.
@EvolutionDocumentary Comparative anatomy shows that animals and humans have a common Designer. Evol- utionists like to limit their comparisons to bone structures, but why stop there? Clouds are 100% water, jelly fish are 98% water, and watermelons are 97% water. Does this prove they all evolved from a common ancestor?
The kidney bean, the redwood tree and the opossum each have 22 chromosomes. Second or third cousins, perhaps?
@EvolutionDocumentary Humans have 46 chromosomes, which would make us near of kin to the bat, and tobacco. With a few million years of gradual evolution, we might even catch up with the carp or maybe even the fern .
The Darwinians like to compare humans and animals to show similarities, but they limit the comparisons to keep from looking foolish. We have a common Creator and Designer, not a common ancestor.
@Arielslopa: Exactly. If all your ancestors didn't live in Southern Africa, then you carry the genes. Your a hybrid between them and what H sapiens was as it exited Africa.
@puncheex well even if your ancestors are from somewhere other than South Africa, it still not 100% true that you have their genes in you. From what I remember, it was a really small minority of people that actually mixed with them, so the chances of a "modern-man" to be related to a Neanderthal are quite slim (it's about 1% to 4%). Still, I'm not an expert xP
@Arielslopa: No, the interpretation is that everyone other than sub-Saharan Africans contains the 700 or so Neanderthal genes that were accepted into the our general genome and have grown to be part of our shared heritage. The uncertainty of 1-4% reflects the probabilities that individual genes have been derived from Neanderthal, not whether you have them or not. In 200 yrs, they will probably wind up in everyone.
we all come from Adam an Eve an if we wr related to apes dont u think there wld b a ape baby in the world ? im so sick of this have evolution dudes stop trying to confuse people we were all made from adam an eve
back2nez 1 day ago
@back2nez You obviously don't understand what evolution is. Evolution cannot be denied, because it is fact. It is a change in the gene pool of a population over time. We have seen this happen with our own eyes, for goodness sake. Educate yourself before you post such ignorance. Your Adam & Eve story is is not based on logic, reasoning or data, unlike evolution.
Adrianaaa2605 21 hours ago
@back2nez didn't know it was actually possible to be that stupid
montebo86 15 hours ago
They always make it out that an ape got up one day and walked as though it was some conscious decision. They should emphasize that walking upright evolved and took generations to happen and happened because those that did walk upright tended to survive long enough and pass on there genes.
simpsonmark 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.
simpsonmark 1 day ago
@selebet77 Agreed!
luffx4e4 1 day ago
people are not interested in finding out our origins...instead they are more interested in kissing the popes ass or blowing them selves up for 72 virgins or cluster bombing civilians...we demonize killing criminals when they kill their own family more than others,,,well,that's what we doing every day.
theWACKIIRAQI 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These creationist trolls are ridiculous... Don't feed them guys please, if they want to debate they will have to do much more studying and educate themselves further.
IBezimeniI 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
IBezimeniI 2 weeks ago
Very interesting fairy tale making by atheist... believe all but trust none. human is a perfect creation from GOD. Intelligent is evidence of difference between us and animal. We not an animal.
selebet77 2 weeks ago
@selebet77 It is at that, entertainment but nothing that supports anything outside of creator.
batestiaful 1 week ago
@batestiaful can you enlighten us and explain which creator you're referring to? cuz honestly there's a wide range of claims in this regard yet scientific findings disagree with all of them...so...who's the "Creator" that you have in mind?
theWACKIIRAQI 1 week ago
@selebet77 Human beings are as imperfect as the hypothetical God you claim designed us...how do u explain the existence of muscles and bones and organs in our bodies that we don't use any more?
Also...which God you referring to?
theWACKIIRAQI 1 week ago
Dubois and his fellow Dutchmen seem to speak Afrikaans!
Popperite 2 weeks ago
How come the Neanderthals not captured and made into slaves like typical behaviour of human species.
I think this latest claim is based on a big race to win the prize for figuring out why the Neanderthal fell of the face of the earth
It is fun to wonder about..but .this 'mass murder' theory of Neanderthal extinction does not make sense to me...
jamieolah 3 weeks ago
If there is no missing link, so what? Science and religion have a lot in common. Neither tolerates anomaly..
toodance 3 weeks ago
Did Homo sapiens actually kill all the Neandertals as seems to be depicted here? I thought we were unsure why Neandertals dies out.
simpsonmark 3 weeks ago
If you are a truth seeker, go to Truthcontest(dot)com and open the Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this, what it says will turn this world right side-up if it reaches enough people in time. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
AnyColourYouLike1OO 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This documentary is very poor.
Nearly every instance here, someone was about to give up and "got a hunch" or heard a voice, then went on to make a major discovery. Really lazy writing of the reconstructions and far too much time spent on the Piltdown hoax.
No mention of; h. rudolphensis, h. antecessor, h. hiedelbergensis, h. ergaster, denisovans etc. The BBC's effort "Walking with Caveman" is much more comprehensive.
007hor 1 month ago
Comment removed
007hor 1 month ago
one person has ancestors named adam and eve.
heysoleilsam 1 month ago
These are some great videos however I don't believe to be a descendant of an Ape
SinisterAngel1 1 month ago
@SinisterAngel1 the fact remains that your DNA is 98% identical to chimps so it doesn't matter what we want to believe
linghun 1 month ago
@linghun Do you know the reason for that?
SinisterAngel1 1 month ago
@SinisterAngel1 Genetic similarity is a fact, it doesn't matter if due to common ancestry or "intelligent" creation: it still indicates a common, similar nature. Just like a Porsche and a VW Beetle are undoubtedly related due to a common creator, even if we had a creator the fact would remain that we are related to chimps, rats and avocados no matter what.
linghun 1 month ago
@linghun 98% identical yet where light years ahead in differences. we are all made from the dust of the earth, breath the same air, eat the same food, where bound to be similar.
SevenLivesManyFaces 1 month ago
@SevenLivesManyFaces light years ahead in terms of differences???
so we walk upright.... lose hair.... get smarter .... and slightly change the morphology ('slightly' in evolutionary terms)
the similarities far outweigh the differences.
haz020190 4 weeks ago
@linghun Humans also share nearly 85% of their DNA with mice. Does that mean that we evolved from mice?
batestiaful 2 weeks ago
@batestiaful No, it means we and mice share a common ancestor
linghun 2 weeks ago
@linghun No, we share a common creator not an ancestor....if that is the case clouds are 100% water, jelly fish are 98% water, and watermelons are 97% water. Does this prove they a evolved from an ancestor?
batestiaful 2 weeks ago
@batestiaful Then tell me when did this creator create life? When was each species created, and where? Was the first of a species created adult or infant? Was the chicken created before or after the egg? Did the first of each mammal have a navel, and why? How do you explain the fossil record? Please point to scientific research supporting your view.
linghun 2 weeks ago
@linghun Are you trying to state that clouds are not water? Or Jelly Fish are not water?? Fossil record??? Oh you mean Lucy? The scientific bunk that was proven false but none other than scientists themselves. You do know that carbon dating is also not an exact science as well right? No of course not, but you believe the bunk posted on You Tube. Can you tell me when science stated when life began? Can science state what was the first species? Has science stated if the first animals had navels?
batestiaful 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@batestiaful No, I am honestly asking you to answer those questions: when did the creator create life? When was each species created, and where? Was the first of a species created adult or infant? Was the chicken created before or after the egg? Did the first of each mammal have a navel, and why? How do you explain the fossil record? You can elaborate.
linghun 1 week ago
@SinisterAngel1 Neither do I.
batestiaful 2 weeks ago
Oh, and I'm trying to watch every video in the channel which is several hours; besides one of the dramatizations of Darwin's life, I've never seen any of the others before. So, thank you very very much for this work. Regardless of how limited I might find any one video, I'm am massively grateful to you for doing the work to make these available. Thank you, thank-you, thank you. I love people who make my brain explode!
mikieginokc1 1 month ago
Everything is a tool of the brain and the outer brain is the tool of the Limbic brain; the most poorly understood system in modern science. No matter what we did or grew from the hair roots to the toe nails, everything we did with our hands or feet, were all expressions of the goal states or the result of the global behavior generated our of the Limbic brain; the source and fabric of consciousness.
But what could I know?
mikieginokc1 1 month ago
How long does it take to change a brain from monitoring for danger from below, shedding that trait while keeping the critical ability to recognize the origin of a sound as coming from either level with the head or above the head; danger from above? How much evolutionary time is required to rewire the entire brains auditory system from the internal wiring to the vestigialization of the lower lobe?
mikieginokc1 1 month ago
It's sad that they didn't mention or deal with the genetic evidence showing our divergence from chimps at 6.6 mya. Also, they did not show us Lucy's teeth, hip bone configuration, or her feet. What differentiated us from the chimp solution to life with a jungle. It's obvious that our species had done something different enough for reproductive divergence from the chimp linage. Note the human ear lobe, the vestigial lobe indicating a change from when the lower ear was important. Now its not!
mikieginokc1 1 month ago
@mikieginokc1 The Lucy "theory" was prove false.....just another species of primate "ape". If "evolution" occurs in a species, shouldn't all of the species evolve at the same time and not just a certain sect of it? Such as apes to human theory, why does the evolutionist believe that humans evolved from a species of apes, yet, have no explanation as to why the theory didn't apply to all of the species? Because it never happened.
batestiaful 2 weeks ago
Fantastic !!!!
MrJujitsu62 1 month ago
youtube has now officially replaced TV for me thanks to you ED, please never start posting ice road truckers like the History Channel
KaijinDV 1 month ago
Some of the politically inspired resistance to Darwinism in human affairs comes from evolutionary scientists themselves. By overemphasizing the search for universals, that is, pan-human traits (partly to show people's commonalities), many evolutionists abandon the very comparative method that created the Darwinian Revolution in the first place. Ignoring or minimizing the role of heritable variation goes against the two basic postulates of Darwinian theory. Go to CHARLESDARWINRESEARCHORG.
NIETZSCHEAN14 1 month ago
I couldn't stop watching this. Thanks for posting!
scotchlouis 1 month ago
All videos are very, very good!
I've fav'ed this one, it is about humans, that's why it is of a more immediate interest. As many people as possible on you tube should watch it.
dewinthemorning 1 month ago
Please like guys, it helps spread the video. I'd appreciate it.
EvolutionDocumentary 1 month ago 14
@EvolutionDocumentary You are the #1 channel on youtube m8. You're providing knowlege and high quality content. Keep up the amazing work!
darkrage1985 1 month ago 8
@EvolutionDocumentary man I fuckin' love it
Laparanoicafierita 1 month ago
@EvolutionDocumentary Comparative anatomy shows that animals and humans have a common Designer. Evol- utionists like to limit their comparisons to bone structures, but why stop there? Clouds are 100% water, jelly fish are 98% water, and watermelons are 97% water. Does this prove they all evolved from a common ancestor?
The kidney bean, the redwood tree and the opossum each have 22 chromosomes. Second or third cousins, perhaps?
batestiaful 2 weeks ago
@EvolutionDocumentary Humans have 46 chromosomes, which would make us near of kin to the bat, and tobacco. With a few million years of gradual evolution, we might even catch up with the carp or maybe even the fern .
The Darwinians like to compare humans and animals to show similarities, but they limit the comparisons to keep from looking foolish. We have a common Creator and Designer, not a common ancestor.
batestiaful 2 weeks ago
Amazing documentary!
Although sad. we killed our own cousin in the pursuit of natural survival.
Arielslopa 1 month ago
@Arielslopa: Well, according to this dramatization.
puncheex 1 month ago
@puncheex regardless of the dramatization, we still brought our cousin's to extinction...
Oh well, I don't think we would have been able to co-exist with them.
(Also apparently some of our ancestors had allegedly "out-breeded" with them, so perhaps they didn't die out completely xD)
Arielslopa 1 month ago
@Arielslopa: Exactly. If all your ancestors didn't live in Southern Africa, then you carry the genes. Your a hybrid between them and what H sapiens was as it exited Africa.
puncheex 1 month ago
@puncheex well even if your ancestors are from somewhere other than South Africa, it still not 100% true that you have their genes in you. From what I remember, it was a really small minority of people that actually mixed with them, so the chances of a "modern-man" to be related to a Neanderthal are quite slim (it's about 1% to 4%). Still, I'm not an expert xP
Arielslopa 1 month ago
@Arielslopa: No, the interpretation is that everyone other than sub-Saharan Africans contains the 700 or so Neanderthal genes that were accepted into the our general genome and have grown to be part of our shared heritage. The uncertainty of 1-4% reflects the probabilities that individual genes have been derived from Neanderthal, not whether you have them or not. In 200 yrs, they will probably wind up in everyone.
puncheex 1 month ago
@puncheex ohh, okay.... as I said: "I'm not an expert"
Arielslopa 1 month ago
Thanks for uploading! Great series.
falynsoul 1 month ago