I've just watched this for the first time. Tho' certainly I come from a place of some knowledge about such things, my mind has so very currently been 'blown' by this, I must reserve opinions until after subsequent viewings. Mostly, I get it. But until I can intelligently chat about it, I'm sure I don't totally comprehend what is being related. Kinda cool to think about...
OK so it's not particles, how bout string theory, yea that's it...wait wait, not string, no no no, how about membrane, yea, that's the ticket, many many much of them, with parallel universes, an infinite number, some the same as ours except where Elvis lives, all following the same laws of physics...no, actually completely different laws of physics, ones we can't even begin to understand...hmmm, we finally understand it all..fantastic stuff..yeaaa, who needs God to explain anything. Paweeze!!!
We c`ant even understand how the brain God gave us works, YET, we go outside the thing we can`t understand to try and figure out something vastly more complex." I will confound the haughty and high minded...................." Why is a ? WAY more important here than how ,as that is the reason for the how.
@GodOfTheInternets ... Thank you, yes we have a God created nature given brain, could`nt have one without the other! ALSO, I said NOTHING about finding God given logic to (invent?) new medicine. Please drop the scales from your God -Nature created eyes.
A modern-parable. Once there was an undergraduate student who brought a perpetual motion machine to a professor. The professor showed the student it would violate the conservation of energy and could never work. "You can't create energy or anything out of nothing, my boy! Its called the conservation of mass-energy." That night, the professor spoke at a Big Bang Conference, lecturing, "All of the known universe was created at one moment of time out of nothing."
@tropchouette "Why are they called "Parallel", if they intersect and bump into each other?"
If you have water pipes parallel, one above the other, if you put a pipe between them they'll remain parallel but water will still flow from the top one to the bottom.
"Why are they "Universes", if a Universe should contain All?" Universe no longer means all.
"How do these Dimensions work?" Exact same as the ones we know in everyday life.
"Isn't 11 overdoing it a bit?" Because of the mathematics of M-theory. It would be impossible to explain it to anyone short of having a PhD in mathematics, particuarly on YouTube. Though through mathematics we know that if M-theory is correct there must be 11 dimensions.
"If there is an infinite number of Universes, doesn't that mean that there is an infinite amount of interaction between our Universe and the Others?"
If there is an infinite number of planets, but an infinite space for them to be in, there would be planets with an infinite amount right next to them, and planets that are an infinite distance away from any other. And planets with a few next to them, a few far away, an infinite amount an infinite distance away.
"Final Question: Why don't I understand All, since this is It?"
But you say the Dimensions work the same as we know in everyday life. If I understand, the 11th dimension is more like a place (an infinitely long tube) than a direction, no? and where did all the other space-dimensions (4-10) get to? And it says that 11th D. is so and so far away from us; how is that possible, since dimensions are all at a right angle to each other?
also gravity might be as strong as the other forces, but it looses strength in different dimensions. like a line has the most gravity, adn a squre has less and a cube has less. then the fourth dimension might be able to fly, and the fifth dimension could float. its possible. lines move back and forth, squres can move up and down.
how big are theese membranes anyway. because if they fit in the 11 dimension than they must be small, so they might be small enough to not bump into each other. there for there could be a nother quest to find the secret of the universe. maybe there is a god, or maybe a subatomic particle aperied and became a black hole, i dont know. i am just wondering
Odd thing is, when I took LSD in the 60's the universe seemed to be One unified thing appears as many. Where time was endless and yet all one millisecond, where the perceived and perceiver are the same thing. But we are legally kept from this and work on it through math. Again, representing life, instead of being it.
I actually liked the Nassim Harameins unified field theory much more than this stuff...i can never actually get myself to like BBC and simillar documentarys...theres something in them thats just sayin, they'r bullshitin you...especially when a scientist that usually looks more like an actor, skates on ice and and shit like that.
The math behind the movement of large objects doesn't hold true to the movement of subatomic particles. String Theory is able to reconcile the difference, but half the scientific community considers string theorists to be madmen and heretics. The existence of the "strings" is still theoretical, because current technology can't verify their existence.
@Mxlsptlk current math can only verify ANYTHING to a certain degree, its never a complete fact. our whole science is based only on what we have discovered so far. And the scales in which we calculate from the smallest to the biggest, cant account for everything that happens in the universe. We think we have it all figured out, but every time we find something new, more troubles appear. Besides our science is full of holes and quantum physics is basically only theoretical.
@ripdoggie ... u ignorant... from where u got that God is human? computers where created by human and it doesm look like us right? They just similiar pfbtje fonction of our brain... I hope u will use ur braim to get my point... u talk of what u know and theres A LOT to know
Budda explained about how big the universe. He use one example. Pulled a hair from the rabbit and slice it into a hundred of very fine hair and deep into the water then pull it out. On the tip of this hair the amount of the water (our galaxy) put into the ocean. That is the size of our universe.
Everything are created by subconsciousness mind and so the universe. So be aware of our intention. That was Budda teach us three thousand years ago. We are all affected by the nature law which is cause by the conditional causation. (cause and affect) . All things created under the conditional causation and have a boundry. To leave out from the boundry. You must need to fully understand the law of nature how to run. A Mi Ta Fu!
Well-known scientists daydreaming in metaphysics...sounds intriguing...teach it as fact....penalize anyone who dissents...shove under the rug contradicting empirical data...perpetuate the mystery....perpetuate the need to solve the mystery....obtain government funding, grants to find a solution....the metaphysical dogma keeps on marching on...
@nohabitualthinking all you know about science was once known as mumbo jumbo, heresy, and stuff like that. No proof not real not possible. I think the only rules for a scientists is to STATE facts after solid calculations but always have an open mind for theories and possibility's. I think science can explain a lot of spiritual stuff, but only when it stops being rigid and stuck in its paradigm while discarding certain things.people whole explained atoms.they looked pretty crazy and full of shit
@nohabitualthinking I think 'scientists' have the same 'foibles' as most men. They are 'prisoners' of their own mindset. And unlike you, can fall into 'habitual thinking'. Also all men in the search of truth, are 'betrayed' by their ego! Why do you have a problem with scientists 'daydreaming in metaphysics'? I think they are offering it as a possible explaination. This path might explain 'dark matter'. What is 'metaphysical dogma'? Would you care to share,I'm really interested. Thanks!
@fntime Big Bang is taught as a fact. It's only a conjecture. Because its clothed in elegant mathematics it must be true! This is the danger and seduction of mathematics, warned by Einstein. Chalk board analysis can involve too much a priori synthetic reasoning. Immanuel Kant purported knowledge could be acquired this way and Einstein was influenced by this via his thought experiments.
@fntime However, mathematics is only symbolic representation of objective reality. Objective reality in cosmology can only be determined by empirical data. There is not enough data to support Big Bang cosmology. There is plenty of contradicting date that is pushed under the rug as anectdotal anomalies. This is not science, this is the preservation of funding of egos.
@fntime Parallel universes is another figment of collective conjecturing that is in the realm of philosophy, not science. It exists in the corridors of theorists minds. There is no absolute mapping of this to objective reality. In our age, unfortunately, education can get in the way of discovering truth.
@fntime If mathematical models show elegant solutions, balanced by symmetry, the math must be true. It must be, is really I hope it is. Too much subjective wishing imposed on objective, critical thinking. And again, Einstein warned that elegance is for tailors.
@fntime Science needs to go back to the emphasis on empirical data and less emphasis on virtual worlds created between two ears. Imagination is good according to Einsten, but too much of it leads to comic book fantasy. It may be interesting and alluring, but so is a Hollywood movie with lots and lots of computer-aided special effects.
@nohabitualthinking By disposition I'm mentally biased toward you opinion. But, I think string theory, M theory and parallel universe theory, are on to something. I think the 'Newtonian Dream' no matter how comfortable for me, is being displaced by ideas that might not seem logical or rational, but may be right. The mind of the prime mover, may be more complicated and mysterious than we mere mortals can even comprehend. Quantum physics is terribly disturbing in its implications.
@fntime Another case in point. Black holes. Einstein dissented from this. He never believed it and wrote a paper showing how nature would prevent this. However, artificial contrivance using mathematics show that THEORITICALLY black holes can exist. The fact is there are alternative explanations found in electrical cosmology that explain what is being told by the empirical data. But this is shoved under the rug by mainstream dogmatists who don't want to let go of their monkey bottles.
@fntime Another case in point. Dark matter. Dark matter arose out of a need for explanation of the rotation speed of stars on the outer edge of rotating galaxies. There is not enough of visible matter to generat enough gravity to hold the stars in place. Thus, there must be an invisible matter responsible. However, plasma scientists have created models that show all of this can be explained by electrical forces, which again, are shoved under the rug by the mainstream establishment.
@fntime Final case by analogy. Trading successfully is simple. Too many people make it more complicated then it has to be. Charts littered with mathematically based indicators clouds the objective reality. Price alone tells the trader what the market is doing, not the mathematically derived indicators. A moving average is all one needs to detect trend movements and Dow's explanation of higher highs and lows for uptrends, lower highs and lows for downtrends. That's it. That's all you need.
@nohabitualthinking Are you an Objectivist? Your thoughts are consistent with Ayn Rands 'philosophy'. In some cases,objective reality,is necessary, an engineer designing an airplane. Parallel Universes,come under the 'Theoretical Physics'. Einstein's Theory of Relativily, certainly was counterintuitive and didn't fit into objective reality in its inception. Do you have any objective facts that prove that Parallel Universe can't be true. It's a starting point. Thanks for your replies.
@fntime I don't categorize myself. I think there is truth and that reliance on the senses-- touch, taste, sight, hearing is a good start to contact reality. Too much reliance on thinking, over-thinking, can lead to outright absurdities. We know that individuals on hallucigens can have very convincing delusions and we know they are not true. They don't conform to reality. In science this can happen less dramatically.
@fntime Do I have facts that prove that Parallel Universes can't be true? We have to be careful here not to comit a logical fallacy. One could ask, show me data that disproves the hypothesis that the earth is infested with quantum-sized martians that get into peoples food and causes cancer. What? You can't show me such data? Then, it might be true.
@fntime About string theory, M-theory, etc. Man always wants to have an explanation, a story, something to give closure. It's human nature. But this need can often push out objectivity. We crave answers because we do not like intellectual dissonance. It unbalances us. The assumption is that man can and should know everything. Well, we can know some things if we don't let our minds get in the way.
@nohabitualthinking I've done a lot of work with vibrational sounds and the effects of vibrations. I'm biased toward string theory. Why? Because it makes sense to me and it feels right. I realize this is not proof. But, I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone. There are certain things for me, that I just know! It is an offshoot of my meditations. I know this sounds wacky!!!! (lol) If you'd like to continue with this, please send me an e-mail to fntime love to hear from you.
@nohabitualthinking What in the world are you going on about? Nobody is teaching string theory "as fact". If you watch/read more about it, you'd realize that. Also, do you not know how the biggest scientific discoveries historically take place? Before the atom was proved to exist in the "dust particle" experiment, they were just "metaphysical daydreams", as you'd call them. Same with black holes. Same with almost every other major discovery in the world of physics.
@nohabitualthinking There is no conspiracy to brainwash everyone into thinking all this is fact. Once (and if) it's PROVEN as fact, it will be taught as such. This is the way of science.
@nohabitualthinking And FYI, there are lots of "well-known" physicists who don't agree with much of string theory. One of the Nobel Prize laureates for discovering the standard model is one of those physicists. Science is very open to all sides of the story. This isn't the 18th century anymore.
This kind of metaphysics is used in tv shows like on the History channel. There's no conspiracy to promote unproven theories. Grants are given on a peer review basis, and require publications, and jornals are peer reviewed and require scientific verification.
@1umbnonearth Yes, great show. Great animation, great special effects, great music, great metaphysical dialogue, but no grain of truth to any of it. All philosophical, anti-science, untestable horse dung.
The more we understand the more the jigsaw is put together but this jigsaw is huge and each generation will contribute to its compleation through the science of the time, We today are only at the very edge of understanding reality.
as well meaning as these scietists are, i cant help thinking they are like monkeys tying to figure out how a super computer works. i mean i could simply ask them, "ok now what started the multiverse?" or "where does time come from?". need i say more.
@stephenddblyth Where things come from might be a problem of language rather than a scientific problem. The answer might be quantum fluctuation started it all, or that everything has always been, or something else. Only science can give an answer anyway, we have no other tool.
I don't buy it. I see people creating theories based on theories then creating the mathematics to fit them and not the other way around. It's like a chess player planning the whole game and claiming to have won without knowing how the opponent will play. I think it would perhaps be better to concentrate on proving certain things without doubt than building a house of cards with theories. In this film they talk about gravity fitting in with the 11th dimension. First, prove what gravity is...
@staminapromos we know for 100% what gravity is, we just don't know why its much more weak than other forces. The only explanation till now is, that gravity is as strong as other forces, but gets weak in our 3D world, after passing trough the other Dimensions. This really sounds very theoretical and like sci-fi, but thats the only logical explanation for it.
i wish i was more intelligent to understand this alot more, i wish i could understand how they were calculating the formula's and what they meant. i can just about picture how it is all occuring.....maybe we are only pass through the membranes when we become what is alowed to pass through and it may take alot of time and many existances to become that....
This is real, just like in your dreams. You dreamt that you can fly, you dreamt that you see orange clouds and surroundings , you dreamt that you are in your home but not the same what it looks including your neighbors. THAT IS BECAUSE YOU HAVE A VERSION OF YOURSELF IN THE OTHER WORLDS WHICH LIKELY COMMUNICATED WITH YOU THRU TELEPATHY WHEN YOU HAPPEN TO FALL ASLEEP SINCE YOUR MIND IS AT REST. AND THOSE WORLDS WHICH I BELIEVE ARE PARALLEL TO OUR PLANET .
I don't get it, if particles go in and out of existence how does that prove parallel universes... If the particle disappears for a sort time to go to another universe it should never re appear do to the infinite number of universes.
@Chansulus .. I went to your channel .. saw your background.. and now i know why you keep repeating fractals, but I in this documentary I don't think that they mentioned fractals... (maybe i'm wrong viewed this a long time ago )
If you have any knowledge about a documentary that would explain why are fractals relevant in the search for parallel universes then please send me the link.
This is CRAP :| They explain the beginning of our universe by claiming there was something before it... And how did that something come in existence? INFINITY! Really?!
So, could a black hole be a tear in reality, leaking material into another dimension? Could the other side be a big bang and afterward an expanding universe? Maybe when the tears happen because of the rate at which the universe expands? Maybe I'm missing something.
Interesting stuff. God created the universe that is the way it is it amazes me all the junk ppl will believe to try and rationalize away from the truth.
So, basically, they said that a parallel universe caused the Big Bang in ours. What caused whatever it was that caused the first universe? The theory is thus unsatisfactory, as it does not solve the problem, but assigns it to another universe. Consequently, we end up with infinite regression, which is problematic and arguably too paradoxical to offer any practical solution. Only the involvement of an Uncaused Cause can satisfy.
@mealemnono tha is the most moronic thing ive ever heard the bible predicts everything 100 % never been wrong never will be i really feel sorry for you and pray for you.
@katrwall1984 lol where is ur god now ?? the world is fucked up i dont think there is god .. btw im suppose to be a muslim .. im egyptian .. but i rlly dont see god !! :/
@mealemnono "the [sic] bible is all bulshit [sic]"
Prove it!
While you're certainly entitled to your opinion, your comment wasn't even an opinion, if it were you'd have provided your reasons for believing so. Your comment was just intended to insult those people that DO believe the Bible is true. In which case, your comment was simply immature and simple-minded. Let's see if you can construct a reasonable argument for your comment, instead of just throwing insults around like a child.
@mealemnono Oh, well. 8 thumbs up, whew! You've hit the big time. If that's really all that you need to feel like you've constructed a worthwhile argument, I can see I'm dealing with a genuine mental midget.
Too much reading for you, huh? OK, go back to your video game Einstein.
@Dr1Canuckchuck hahaha i dont play video games and im not trying to construct anythiing .. i just said wats on my mind and ppl feel me ! go back to ur bible :)
@mealemnono Well, this may surprise you, but I don't feel the Bible is true, either. I was referring more to a belief in God than I was the truth of the Bible. I think the Bible was man-made to achieve an objective of control over the masses and all organized religion is a scam to support that agenda. However, I DO believe in God. I was simply asking you to support your argument with some facts, because you were clearly just attacking other people's beliefs, and that is childish.
I know you're not trying to construct anything, that was the basis for my reply. If you can't construct something around a statement like the one you made, you have no business making those types of comments. They just show the rest of us that you are unable to construct anything and you're just attempting to belittle the beliefs of others, that is what's childish about what you said - get it?
@mealemnono All I was trying to get you to see is that when you are going to express your beliefs you need to also back it up with facts, otherwise it's just an insult and it doesn't take much intelligence to insult someone else's beliefs.
@Dr1Canuckchuck Your very smart, your very polite, AND your very right on what you just said. BUT, theres one but. This isnt a school/collage/university or any other social controlled debate, hence anyone can say whatever the fuck they want, just ignore. it's not like your going to educate him or "teach him a lesson" and you know it, why bother? Just let it go ;] I for example have a couple of theories for god and bibble's, but cant say i truly believe in any yet.
@mrice102888 what are you talking about?just check 2 comments lower, I quote: prove the opposite! At least Science has explained most things, even what happened a billion of a second after the big Bang. Islam, Christianity and Judaism wants that you believe, that an old Guy is sitting somewhere and creating stuff and looking at us...come on.
Next time read before you talk such a crap, I just rewrote the first comment, because I forgot something. Gosh...you're such an idiot, sorry but try to act like a man, not a little boy.
@mrice102888: I will quote it, as you're to stupid to find it: "prove the opposite! At least Science has explained most things, even what happened a billion of a second after the big Bang. Islam, Christianity and Judaism wants that you believe, that an old Guy is sitting somewhere and creating stuff while looking at us...come on."Try to act like 23, if you really are.
prove the opposite! At least Science has explained most things, even what happened a billion of a second after the big Bang. Islam, Christianity and Judaism wants that you believe, that an old Guy is sitting somewhere and creating stuff and looking at us...come on.
Michio can get you to believe anything. He is very convincing and brilliant. Parallel Universes aren't mathematically provable at this time, but it's more believable than a lot of the stories in the bible. Especially it's creation stories, etc.
Great stuff. Wish Feinman were here to share his well grounded and practical views concerning this voodooish sounding stuff. A metaphor using fingernail clippings or something. Cool voodoo though.
An infinite number of universes would surely contain, an infinite number of universes identical to ours, as well as an infinite number of universes that differ from ours, by an infinite range of differences, from the placement of one penny or the location of one atom....etc. Surely someone in one of those universes will have figured out how to traverse, or send probes across the multiverse. Where are they?
Ok, question: if there are infinite universes, would there be one where Napoleon's troops all carried bananas and aimed them like they were guns? I'm just thinking of Hawking's statement about the moon being made of cheese and I wonder how ridiculous things can get.
@MrStillmans I was thinking something like that also - could it really be that in a galaxy far, far away, the entire storyline of Star Wars actually played out, perhaps minus the 'impossible physics'?
@MrStillmans Or perhaps only those events that can be found by following a chain of adjacent steps of Planck length and time are available to us. Not quite sure how to express that idea, but I think of 'impossible' meaning that you need to build a bridge that's too far past whats actually available even to the fundamental particles.
ok so this means theres a universe where i don't have to put up with kaku and his smug sense of self worth but also that actually is prob one which does in fact revolve around him. also does the last bit sound very much like the internet to anyone else
@hyshyco he speaks pure feces..just cool trendy buzz words to grab attention, but reveals little about the science behind it..I dont think he is even a real scientist with a PHD
@lukedyks13 are you Kaku? anyway people are smarter than you think..no harm in throwing in some maths and quantum mechanics..not everyone needs everything broken down into sub-100 IQ chunks
@viralfunnies I agree with you fully about the lack of mathematics in the show but the program is designed to get viewers. I watched this program on tele a few years ago before I studied the subject, it was quite confusing at the time. Without any maths!
@xHappax the human mind... not the brain... it's all good to spit out facts, though reality consists of a lot more than just facts... i do not presume to be all knowing... but i know what i know is what i know... :)))
What the grand majority of people don't realize is that the infinite universes out there ARE us! We send fractals of our own being to experience the different constructs of others universes that are literally made of us. An aspect of you is inside my universe, which I created, and an aspect of me is inside your universe. We are all just trying to learn how to be like each other. Currently we are learning the construct of light, and will soon be able to create our own light construct universes.
This is the problem with science and logic, inherently based on the limited info of what can be percieved within this reality. They have confused the difference between other universes and other dimensions WITHIN this universe. There ARE infinite other universes out there, but they are not all made of the construct of light/sound/vibration. There are NOT infinite other parallel universes out there like this one, where you have lived out all the different choices in your current life.
@ranneyceth could the multiverse be a multi dimensional fractal, comprised of dimensional vortex's... being that each vortex connects not only all the dimensions in a universe to each other, but to thier universe as well as connecting all the universes together allowing the size of the multiverse to be greater than itself while also containing laws of structure?
@NAKOR007 Hard to answer this question without defining what a multiverse is. The grand majority of people in this scientific realm confuse other dimensional levels of THIS universe with actual other universes. Dimensional levels themselves, in this universe, are not ultimately connected by vortexes. They are only separated by the vibrational frequency of the energy in each level. To ascend to a higher dimensional level one merely increases the vibrational frequency of their consciousness.
@NAKOR007 Bewarned, ranneyceth sounds a lot like deepak chopra. "To ascend to a higher dimensional level one merely increases the vibrational frequency of their consciousness" sounds like BS
So why isn't there an alternate universe, where humans somehow managed to come into our universe, and greet us saying they came from a paralell one?
Deep40000 40 minutes ago
"Hippo gets explosive diarrhea." [suggested video]---------------------------------------------->
Thanks, youtube media moguls. It's so obvious that you aren't trying to dumb us all down as the conspiracy theorists allege.
benskin79 12 hours ago
I've just watched this for the first time. Tho' certainly I come from a place of some knowledge about such things, my mind has so very currently been 'blown' by this, I must reserve opinions until after subsequent viewings. Mostly, I get it. But until I can intelligently chat about it, I'm sure I don't totally comprehend what is being related. Kinda cool to think about...
JWCreatesArt 1 week ago
Oh, and I think M in M-Theory should should stand for Metaphysics....or Megamind :)
toontune 2 weeks ago
OK so it's not particles, how bout string theory, yea that's it...wait wait, not string, no no no, how about membrane, yea, that's the ticket, many many much of them, with parallel universes, an infinite number, some the same as ours except where Elvis lives, all following the same laws of physics...no, actually completely different laws of physics, ones we can't even begin to understand...hmmm, we finally understand it all..fantastic stuff..yeaaa, who needs God to explain anything. Paweeze!!!
toontune 2 weeks ago
Wouldn't this theory open the possibilty for infinite energy production?
bogieman987 3 weeks ago
@bogieman987
No because you can't access other universes.
GodOfTheInternets 2 weeks ago
@GodOfTheInternets How do you know?
bogieman987 2 weeks ago
We c`ant even understand how the brain God gave us works, YET, we go outside the thing we can`t understand to try and figure out something vastly more complex." I will confound the haughty and high minded...................." Why is a ? WAY more important here than how ,as that is the reason for the how.
muypro4 1 month ago
@muypro4
Blah blah blah. By your logic we should not try to invent new medicine because we haven't figured out how our nature-given brain works.
GodOfTheInternets 2 weeks ago
@GodOfTheInternets ... Thank you, yes we have a God created nature given brain, could`nt have one without the other! ALSO, I said NOTHING about finding God given logic to (invent?) new medicine. Please drop the scales from your God -Nature created eyes.
muypro4 2 weeks ago
@muypro4 Natural selection gave us developed brains.
DannyKing3000 1 day ago
@DannyKing3000 Could be, yet who made the original brain?
muypro4 1 day ago
For some reason, I always believed in parallel dimensions..... Now I believe I wasn't crazy lol
Djvfm1 1 month ago
Don't know why I didn't just use the internet before asking here. 2002.
mFlemMusic 1 month ago
When was this program broadcast? I'm taking a wild guess at early 2000s or possibly 90s?!
mFlemMusic 1 month ago
..and who created these membranes???
tubinho79 1 month ago
@tubinho79 You mean "what".....
bogieman987 3 weeks ago
Quite interesting. Hoping the maths are not artifacts.
philippejacob 1 month ago
A modern-parable. Once there was an undergraduate student who brought a perpetual motion machine to a professor. The professor showed the student it would violate the conservation of energy and could never work. "You can't create energy or anything out of nothing, my boy! Its called the conservation of mass-energy." That night, the professor spoke at a Big Bang Conference, lecturing, "All of the known universe was created at one moment of time out of nothing."
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@nohabitualthinking The intellectualized rational mind lacks
subtly and requires 'measurements'. I lack spelling.(lol)
Scientist don't can't even comphrend the concept of a Prime
Mover. It violates not only their egoistic intellectualized mind,
it will get them kicked out of the 'science fraternity'.
I agree with your objections. They can't get themselves out
of concept a universe without a creator.
No intelligent person buys into religion, but being an
atheist, is simplistic.
fntime 1 month ago
Why are they called "Parallel", if they intersect and bump into each other?
Why are they "Universes", if a Universe should contain All?
How do these Dimensions work? Isn't 11 overdoing it a bit?
If there is an infinite number of Universes, doesn't that mean that there is an infinite amount of interaction between our Universe and the Others?
Final Question: Why don't I understand All, since this is It?
tropchouette 1 month ago
@tropchouette "Why are they called "Parallel", if they intersect and bump into each other?"
If you have water pipes parallel, one above the other, if you put a pipe between them they'll remain parallel but water will still flow from the top one to the bottom.
"Why are they "Universes", if a Universe should contain All?" Universe no longer means all.
"How do these Dimensions work?" Exact same as the ones we know in everyday life.
BlueCosmology 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tropchouette
"Isn't 11 overdoing it a bit?" Because of the mathematics of M-theory. It would be impossible to explain it to anyone short of having a PhD in mathematics, particuarly on YouTube. Though through mathematics we know that if M-theory is correct there must be 11 dimensions.
"If there is an infinite number of Universes, doesn't that mean that there is an infinite amount of interaction between our Universe and the Others?"
BlueCosmology 1 month ago
@tropchouette
If there is an infinite number of planets, but an infinite space for them to be in, there would be planets with an infinite amount right next to them, and planets that are an infinite distance away from any other. And planets with a few next to them, a few far away, an infinite amount an infinite distance away.
"Final Question: Why don't I understand All, since this is It?"
Don't understand what you mean.
BlueCosmology 1 month ago
@BlueCosmology
Thanks for the explanations!
But you say the Dimensions work the same as we know in everyday life. If I understand, the 11th dimension is more like a place (an infinitely long tube) than a direction, no? and where did all the other space-dimensions (4-10) get to? And it says that 11th D. is so and so far away from us; how is that possible, since dimensions are all at a right angle to each other?
Thanks again :)
tropchouette 1 month ago
also gravity might be as strong as the other forces, but it looses strength in different dimensions. like a line has the most gravity, adn a squre has less and a cube has less. then the fourth dimension might be able to fly, and the fifth dimension could float. its possible. lines move back and forth, squres can move up and down.
nosightnoearsnomouth 1 month ago
how big are theese membranes anyway. because if they fit in the 11 dimension than they must be small, so they might be small enough to not bump into each other. there for there could be a nother quest to find the secret of the universe. maybe there is a god, or maybe a subatomic particle aperied and became a black hole, i dont know. i am just wondering
nosightnoearsnomouth 1 month ago
Isn't this like the thinks we imagined as children of multiple verses? Interesting.
TheDevilsBusiness 2 months ago
We live in those other universes, and this is the reflection.
TheDevilsBusiness 2 months ago
@TheDevilsBusiness lol you need to lay off the drugs.
katrwall1984 1 month ago
@katrwall1984 Or you need to try
TheDevilsBusiness 1 month ago
Odd thing is, when I took LSD in the 60's the universe seemed to be One unified thing appears as many. Where time was endless and yet all one millisecond, where the perceived and perceiver are the same thing. But we are legally kept from this and work on it through math. Again, representing life, instead of being it.
TheDevilsBusiness 2 months ago
I actually liked the Nassim Harameins unified field theory much more than this stuff...i can never actually get myself to like BBC and simillar documentarys...theres something in them thats just sayin, they'r bullshitin you...especially when a scientist that usually looks more like an actor, skates on ice and and shit like that.
Remedynr 2 months ago
The math behind the movement of large objects doesn't hold true to the movement of subatomic particles. String Theory is able to reconcile the difference, but half the scientific community considers string theorists to be madmen and heretics. The existence of the "strings" is still theoretical, because current technology can't verify their existence.
Mxlsptlk 2 months ago
@Mxlsptlk current math can only verify ANYTHING to a certain degree, its never a complete fact. our whole science is based only on what we have discovered so far. And the scales in which we calculate from the smallest to the biggest, cant account for everything that happens in the universe. We think we have it all figured out, but every time we find something new, more troubles appear. Besides our science is full of holes and quantum physics is basically only theoretical.
Remedynr 2 months ago
we still hav lot to understand
sufiakhatoon 2 months ago
So we're just one big episode of Sponge bob square pants.
Redflowers9 2 months ago 6
@Antonysmarvels You should check more around you and care less for yours passions
alphys 2 months ago
@ripdoggie ... u ignorant... from where u got that God is human? computers where created by human and it doesm look like us right? They just similiar pfbtje fonction of our brain... I hope u will use ur braim to get my point... u talk of what u know and theres A LOT to know
alphys 2 months ago
@alphys God came to earth as a human as Jesus Christ to allow us into heaven, and died for us but. He is not human he m
ade us in his image though. He actually exist in 3 entities but is one.
katrwall1984 1 month ago
Budda explained about how big the universe. He use one example. Pulled a hair from the rabbit and slice it into a hundred of very fine hair and deep into the water then pull it out. On the tip of this hair the amount of the water (our galaxy) put into the ocean. That is the size of our universe.
kamsmelon1 3 months ago
Everything are created by subconsciousness mind and so the universe. So be aware of our intention. That was Budda teach us three thousand years ago. We are all affected by the nature law which is cause by the conditional causation. (cause and affect) . All things created under the conditional causation and have a boundry. To leave out from the boundry. You must need to fully understand the law of nature how to run. A Mi Ta Fu!
kamsmelon1 3 months ago
Well-known scientists daydreaming in metaphysics...sounds intriguing...teach it as fact....penalize anyone who dissents...shove under the rug contradicting empirical data...perpetuate the mystery....perpetuate the need to solve the mystery....obtain government funding, grants to find a solution....the metaphysical dogma keeps on marching on...
nohabitualthinking 3 months ago
@nohabitualthinking all you know about science was once known as mumbo jumbo, heresy, and stuff like that. No proof not real not possible. I think the only rules for a scientists is to STATE facts after solid calculations but always have an open mind for theories and possibility's. I think science can explain a lot of spiritual stuff, but only when it stops being rigid and stuck in its paradigm while discarding certain things.people whole explained atoms.they looked pretty crazy and full of shit
Remedynr 2 months ago
fntime 1 month ago
@fntime Big Bang is taught as a fact. It's only a conjecture. Because its clothed in elegant mathematics it must be true! This is the danger and seduction of mathematics, warned by Einstein. Chalk board analysis can involve too much a priori synthetic reasoning. Immanuel Kant purported knowledge could be acquired this way and Einstein was influenced by this via his thought experiments.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@fntime However, mathematics is only symbolic representation of objective reality. Objective reality in cosmology can only be determined by empirical data. There is not enough data to support Big Bang cosmology. There is plenty of contradicting date that is pushed under the rug as anectdotal anomalies. This is not science, this is the preservation of funding of egos.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@fntime Parallel universes is another figment of collective conjecturing that is in the realm of philosophy, not science. It exists in the corridors of theorists minds. There is no absolute mapping of this to objective reality. In our age, unfortunately, education can get in the way of discovering truth.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@fntime If mathematical models show elegant solutions, balanced by symmetry, the math must be true. It must be, is really I hope it is. Too much subjective wishing imposed on objective, critical thinking. And again, Einstein warned that elegance is for tailors.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@fntime Science needs to go back to the emphasis on empirical data and less emphasis on virtual worlds created between two ears. Imagination is good according to Einsten, but too much of it leads to comic book fantasy. It may be interesting and alluring, but so is a Hollywood movie with lots and lots of computer-aided special effects.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
fntime 1 month ago
@fntime Another case in point. Black holes. Einstein dissented from this. He never believed it and wrote a paper showing how nature would prevent this. However, artificial contrivance using mathematics show that THEORITICALLY black holes can exist. The fact is there are alternative explanations found in electrical cosmology that explain what is being told by the empirical data. But this is shoved under the rug by mainstream dogmatists who don't want to let go of their monkey bottles.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@fntime Another case in point. Dark matter. Dark matter arose out of a need for explanation of the rotation speed of stars on the outer edge of rotating galaxies. There is not enough of visible matter to generat enough gravity to hold the stars in place. Thus, there must be an invisible matter responsible. However, plasma scientists have created models that show all of this can be explained by electrical forces, which again, are shoved under the rug by the mainstream establishment.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@nohabitualthinking At the turn century, there were scientist
who complained that 'atoms' were not provable and didn't exist.
I personally never felt comfortable with Dark matter & Dark
energy. There is an effect, searching for a cause.
fntime 1 month ago
@fntime Final case by analogy. Trading successfully is simple. Too many people make it more complicated then it has to be. Charts littered with mathematically based indicators clouds the objective reality. Price alone tells the trader what the market is doing, not the mathematically derived indicators. A moving average is all one needs to detect trend movements and Dow's explanation of higher highs and lows for uptrends, lower highs and lows for downtrends. That's it. That's all you need.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
fntime 1 month ago
@fntime I don't categorize myself. I think there is truth and that reliance on the senses-- touch, taste, sight, hearing is a good start to contact reality. Too much reliance on thinking, over-thinking, can lead to outright absurdities. We know that individuals on hallucigens can have very convincing delusions and we know they are not true. They don't conform to reality. In science this can happen less dramatically.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@fntime Do I have facts that prove that Parallel Universes can't be true? We have to be careful here not to comit a logical fallacy. One could ask, show me data that disproves the hypothesis that the earth is infested with quantum-sized martians that get into peoples food and causes cancer. What? You can't show me such data? Then, it might be true.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@fntime About string theory, M-theory, etc. Man always wants to have an explanation, a story, something to give closure. It's human nature. But this need can often push out objectivity. We crave answers because we do not like intellectual dissonance. It unbalances us. The assumption is that man can and should know everything. Well, we can know some things if we don't let our minds get in the way.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
@fntime String theory is truly a mathematical Alice in Wonderland, but Alice in Wonderland was a work of fiction.
nohabitualthinking 1 month ago
fntime 1 month ago
@nohabitualthinking You must have looked at my favorites.(lol)
Your evaluation of trading for me is correct.
Sometimes you get paralysis through analysis. Making simple
things complicated. But, it's important to understand what
other traders are thinking or not thinking.
I think short term traders usually go broke.
Warren Buffet to me, has it right when it comes to investing.
Play the major trend and watch that it is intact.
But, if you got another theory that works, I'm all ears!!
fntime 1 month ago
@nohabitualthinking What in the world are you going on about? Nobody is teaching string theory "as fact". If you watch/read more about it, you'd realize that. Also, do you not know how the biggest scientific discoveries historically take place? Before the atom was proved to exist in the "dust particle" experiment, they were just "metaphysical daydreams", as you'd call them. Same with black holes. Same with almost every other major discovery in the world of physics.
intuit13 1 week ago
@nohabitualthinking There is no conspiracy to brainwash everyone into thinking all this is fact. Once (and if) it's PROVEN as fact, it will be taught as such. This is the way of science.
intuit13 1 week ago
@nohabitualthinking And FYI, there are lots of "well-known" physicists who don't agree with much of string theory. One of the Nobel Prize laureates for discovering the standard model is one of those physicists. Science is very open to all sides of the story. This isn't the 18th century anymore.
intuit13 1 week ago
@nohabitualthinking
This kind of metaphysics is used in tv shows like on the History channel. There's no conspiracy to promote unproven theories. Grants are given on a peer review basis, and require publications, and jornals are peer reviewed and require scientific verification.
charlesvan13 3 days ago
fact or bullshit....you decide!
sirpico123 3 months ago
As I said, sciemce itz just the detailled explaination of Gods Majesty
alphys 3 months ago
@alphys haha you have no idea what your talking about.
rainbowsandonions 3 months ago
@alphys god's majesty LOL... you're smoking massive crack... there's no imaginary man watching you pee...
ripdoggie 3 months ago
Lol its funny... Arent they any believer in The Almighty?
alphys 3 months ago
@alphys YEP THERES PLENTY OF US DONT WORRY! :]
Antonysmarvels 2 months ago in playlist dOCUMENTARIES
Great show! *****
1umbnonearth 3 months ago
@1umbnonearth Yes, great show. Great animation, great special effects, great music, great metaphysical dialogue, but no grain of truth to any of it. All philosophical, anti-science, untestable horse dung.
nohabitualthinking 3 months ago
I wouldn't have minded being in the same carriage on the train as those 3 guys to witness that conversation they had! :D
jacderida 3 months ago
The more we understand the more the jigsaw is put together but this jigsaw is huge and each generation will contribute to its compleation through the science of the time, We today are only at the very edge of understanding reality.
john5o 3 months ago
as well meaning as these scietists are, i cant help thinking they are like monkeys tying to figure out how a super computer works. i mean i could simply ask them, "ok now what started the multiverse?" or "where does time come from?". need i say more.
stephenddblyth 3 months ago
@stephenddblyth Where things come from might be a problem of language rather than a scientific problem. The answer might be quantum fluctuation started it all, or that everything has always been, or something else. Only science can give an answer anyway, we have no other tool.
astroboomboy 3 months ago
12:11 so for their lives we have to keep these phyiscs laws.this is nonsense only the thing that is true shud remain all rest shud rest now,
schehry 4 months ago
"Next time tonight get set for the great sperm race"
hahah
lonnie817 4 months ago
I don't buy it. I see people creating theories based on theories then creating the mathematics to fit them and not the other way around. It's like a chess player planning the whole game and claiming to have won without knowing how the opponent will play. I think it would perhaps be better to concentrate on proving certain things without doubt than building a house of cards with theories. In this film they talk about gravity fitting in with the 11th dimension. First, prove what gravity is...
staminapromos 4 months ago
@staminapromos we know for 100% what gravity is, we just don't know why its much more weak than other forces. The only explanation till now is, that gravity is as strong as other forces, but gets weak in our 3D world, after passing trough the other Dimensions. This really sounds very theoretical and like sci-fi, but thats the only logical explanation for it.
ChrisRenucci 3 months ago
i wish i was more intelligent to understand this alot more, i wish i could understand how they were calculating the formula's and what they meant. i can just about picture how it is all occuring.....maybe we are only pass through the membranes when we become what is alowed to pass through and it may take alot of time and many existances to become that....
TheOrganic78 4 months ago
Those Who Disliked This Video is either Out of their mind Or has no mind at all.
WEDoTA2011 4 months ago
Comment removed
10047paul 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@logmwinwtf and what about it? do u believe a big guy created 2 people and a talking snake to eat out of a tree that gives u knowlege????...idiot.
llamascanplaynitendo 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is real, just like in your dreams. You dreamt that you can fly, you dreamt that you see orange clouds and surroundings , you dreamt that you are in your home but not the same what it looks including your neighbors. THAT IS BECAUSE YOU HAVE A VERSION OF YOURSELF IN THE OTHER WORLDS WHICH LIKELY COMMUNICATED WITH YOU THRU TELEPATHY WHEN YOU HAPPEN TO FALL ASLEEP SINCE YOUR MIND IS AT REST. AND THOSE WORLDS WHICH I BELIEVE ARE PARALLEL TO OUR PLANET .
pogpog28 4 months ago
So maybe when we look through a microscope and see cells divide, we could acctually be watching new universes being created ;)
ThermalHD 4 months ago
I don't get it, if particles go in and out of existence how does that prove parallel universes... If the particle disappears for a sort time to go to another universe it should never re appear do to the infinite number of universes.
shapingAfuture 5 months ago 2
@shapingAfuture good insight
Remedynr 2 months ago
@shapingAfuture its fractal dumb ass .
Chansulus 1 month ago
@Chansulus What "its fractal" ? Please use your rich vocabulary to explain it in more detail.
shapingAfuture 1 month ago
@shapingAfuture its fractal
Chansulus 1 month ago
@Chansulus .. I went to your channel .. saw your background.. and now i know why you keep repeating fractals, but I in this documentary I don't think that they mentioned fractals... (maybe i'm wrong viewed this a long time ago )
If you have any knowledge about a documentary that would explain why are fractals relevant in the search for parallel universes then please send me the link.
(seriously I would like to know more about it)
shapingAfuture 1 month ago
The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine!
J.B.S. Haldane
whitenightf3 5 months ago
This is CRAP :| They explain the beginning of our universe by claiming there was something before it... And how did that something come in existence? INFINITY! Really?!
logmeinwtf 5 months ago
Psh. No documentary narrator can beat Morgan Freeman.
Bredli37 5 months ago 2
@Bredli37 unless it's James Earl Jones
Kreneep1052 4 months ago
This music is driving me crazy!
A55ma57er 5 months ago
So, could a black hole be a tear in reality, leaking material into another dimension? Could the other side be a big bang and afterward an expanding universe? Maybe when the tears happen because of the rate at which the universe expands? Maybe I'm missing something.
TheSpurian 5 months ago
Comment removed
katrwall1984 6 months ago
Interesting stuff. God created the universe that is the way it is it amazes me all the junk ppl will believe to try and rationalize away from the truth.
katrwall1984 6 months ago
@katrwall1984 Stop talking, you're an embarrassment.
MinotawrTV 6 months ago 11
@katrwall1984 Faggot.
mike060187 6 months ago
So, basically, they said that a parallel universe caused the Big Bang in ours. What caused whatever it was that caused the first universe? The theory is thus unsatisfactory, as it does not solve the problem, but assigns it to another universe. Consequently, we end up with infinite regression, which is problematic and arguably too paradoxical to offer any practical solution. Only the involvement of an Uncaused Cause can satisfy.
yasashiiookami 6 months ago
@yasashiiookami I'm shocked by the fact that this isn't the top comment..
SomeAnimeOtaku 5 days ago 2
the bible is all bulshit
mealemnono 6 months ago 48
@mealemnono tha is the most moronic thing ive ever heard the bible predicts everything 100 % never been wrong never will be i really feel sorry for you and pray for you.
katrwall1984 6 months ago
@katrwall1984 lol where is ur god now ?? the world is fucked up i dont think there is god .. btw im suppose to be a muslim .. im egyptian .. but i rlly dont see god !! :/
mealemnono 6 months ago
@katrwall1984 Deluded fool. Please don't post anything else; you truly are an embarrassment to humanity.
hexdrin 4 months ago
@mealemnono thought I am not 'religious' theres still alof o good aspects of the bible, no religion at its core wishes for the suffering of others.
Synetearis 6 months ago
@Synetearis thats exactly right .. im wit u in this
mealemnono 5 months ago
Comment removed
Dr1Canuckchuck 5 months ago
@mealemnono "the [sic] bible is all bulshit [sic]"
Prove it!
While you're certainly entitled to your opinion, your comment wasn't even an opinion, if it were you'd have provided your reasons for believing so. Your comment was just intended to insult those people that DO believe the Bible is true. In which case, your comment was simply immature and simple-minded. Let's see if you can construct a reasonable argument for your comment, instead of just throwing insults around like a child.
Dr1Canuckchuck 5 months ago
@Dr1Canuckchuck i will not read all that :D
im rite cuz my comment got 8 thumbs up !
mealemnono 5 months ago
@mealemnono Oh, well. 8 thumbs up, whew! You've hit the big time. If that's really all that you need to feel like you've constructed a worthwhile argument, I can see I'm dealing with a genuine mental midget.
Too much reading for you, huh? OK, go back to your video game Einstein.
Dr1Canuckchuck 5 months ago
@Dr1Canuckchuck hahaha i dont play video games and im not trying to construct anythiing .. i just said wats on my mind and ppl feel me ! go back to ur bible :)
mealemnono 5 months ago
@mealemnono Well, this may surprise you, but I don't feel the Bible is true, either. I was referring more to a belief in God than I was the truth of the Bible. I think the Bible was man-made to achieve an objective of control over the masses and all organized religion is a scam to support that agenda. However, I DO believe in God. I was simply asking you to support your argument with some facts, because you were clearly just attacking other people's beliefs, and that is childish.
Dr1Canuckchuck 5 months ago 2
@mealemnono A whole 8 people "feel" you?
I know you're not trying to construct anything, that was the basis for my reply. If you can't construct something around a statement like the one you made, you have no business making those types of comments. They just show the rest of us that you are unable to construct anything and you're just attempting to belittle the beliefs of others, that is what's childish about what you said - get it?
Dr1Canuckchuck 5 months ago
@Dr1Canuckchuck no no no im not trying to belittle the beliefs of any thing .. but .. i will say wat i want .. and i dont care wat u think about me
mealemnono 5 months ago
@mealemnono All I was trying to get you to see is that when you are going to express your beliefs you need to also back it up with facts, otherwise it's just an insult and it doesn't take much intelligence to insult someone else's beliefs.
Dr1Canuckchuck 5 months ago
@Dr1Canuckchuck Your very smart, your very polite, AND your very right on what you just said. BUT, theres one but. This isnt a school/collage/university or any other social controlled debate, hence anyone can say whatever the fuck they want, just ignore. it's not like your going to educate him or "teach him a lesson" and you know it, why bother? Just let it go ;] I for example have a couple of theories for god and bibble's, but cant say i truly believe in any yet.
Remedynr 2 months ago
@mealemnono Prove it.
mrice102888 4 months ago
Comment removed
ChrisRenucci 4 months ago
@ChrisRenucci Pussy removed his comment. LOL :D
mrice102888 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrice102888 what are you talking about?just check 2 comments lower, I quote: prove the opposite! At least Science has explained most things, even what happened a billion of a second after the big Bang. Islam, Christianity and Judaism wants that you believe, that an old Guy is sitting somewhere and creating stuff and looking at us...come on.
ChrisRenucci 4 months ago
Next time read before you talk such a crap, I just rewrote the first comment, because I forgot something. Gosh...you're such an idiot, sorry but try to act like a man, not a little boy.
ChrisRenucci 4 months ago
@ChrisRenucci Really? I'm an idiot? Where is you're new comment? It is gone. BTW, i'm fuckin 23 you ass.
mrice102888 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrice102888: I will quote it, as you're to stupid to find it: "prove the opposite! At least Science has explained most things, even what happened a billion of a second after the big Bang. Islam, Christianity and Judaism wants that you believe, that an old Guy is sitting somewhere and creating stuff while looking at us...come on."Try to act like 23, if you really are.
ChrisRenucci 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
prove the opposite! At least Science has explained most things, even what happened a billion of a second after the big Bang. Islam, Christianity and Judaism wants that you believe, that an old Guy is sitting somewhere and creating stuff and looking at us...come on.
ChrisRenucci 4 months ago
@mealemnono so, go out and get your fill ! satan is waiting ..
TheFrostymountains 2 months ago
@anaid223 Perhaps light is conscious. On a base level, that is.
DeLightToDeLirium 6 months ago
String Theory is a great concept, but it has holes in it.
Boogyman4050 6 months ago
@Boogyman4050 it needs black holes to be complete. check nassim haramein's theory
ziochristmas 6 months ago
Michio can get you to believe anything. He is very convincing and brilliant. Parallel Universes aren't mathematically provable at this time, but it's more believable than a lot of the stories in the bible. Especially it's creation stories, etc.
Boogyman4050 6 months ago
No kidding! Kaku really figure skates? Cool!!
EarthaKit2 6 months ago
Feynman. I spelled his name wrong before.
EddiePssghetti 7 months ago
Great stuff. Wish Feinman were here to share his well grounded and practical views concerning this voodooish sounding stuff. A metaphor using fingernail clippings or something. Cool voodoo though.
EddiePssghetti 7 months ago
An infinite number of universes would surely contain, an infinite number of universes identical to ours, as well as an infinite number of universes that differ from ours, by an infinite range of differences, from the placement of one penny or the location of one atom....etc. Surely someone in one of those universes will have figured out how to traverse, or send probes across the multiverse. Where are they?
EddiePssghetti 7 months ago
@EddiePssghetti probing a different universe lol
eamo89 6 months ago
Ok, question: if there are infinite universes, would there be one where Napoleon's troops all carried bananas and aimed them like they were guns? I'm just thinking of Hawking's statement about the moon being made of cheese and I wonder how ridiculous things can get.
MrStillmans 7 months ago
@MrStillmans I was thinking something like that also - could it really be that in a galaxy far, far away, the entire storyline of Star Wars actually played out, perhaps minus the 'impossible physics'?
stephencropley 7 months ago
@MrStillmans Or perhaps only those events that can be found by following a chain of adjacent steps of Planck length and time are available to us. Not quite sure how to express that idea, but I think of 'impossible' meaning that you need to build a bridge that's too far past whats actually available even to the fundamental particles.
stephencropley 7 months ago
ok so this means theres a universe where i don't have to put up with kaku and his smug sense of self worth but also that actually is prob one which does in fact revolve around him. also does the last bit sound very much like the internet to anyone else
frostyhammer 8 months ago
kaku is full of shit
viralfunnies 8 months ago
@viralfunnies
I find him a bit annoying!..
hyshyco 8 months ago
@hyshyco he speaks pure feces..just cool trendy buzz words to grab attention, but reveals little about the science behind it..I dont think he is even a real scientist with a PHD
viralfunnies 7 months ago
@viralfunnies The point in Horizon is to tell stories about science to make it interesting not one of my university lectures!
lukedyks13 7 months ago
@lukedyks13 are you Kaku? anyway people are smarter than you think..no harm in throwing in some maths and quantum mechanics..not everyone needs everything broken down into sub-100 IQ chunks
viralfunnies 7 months ago
@viralfunnies I agree with you fully about the lack of mathematics in the show but the program is designed to get viewers. I watched this program on tele a few years ago before I studied the subject, it was quite confusing at the time. Without any maths!
lukedyks13 7 months ago
@viralfunnies
as you are
BelleDeloin 7 months ago
@BelleDeloin no, I don't spout pseudo scientific shit..I stick to cold real facts, and dont whore myself to the media
viralfunnies 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Michio is awesome !
thats is all !
carry on !
as you were !
ZySLyPhlonzelatol 8 months ago
science fiction!
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
i have dreamt of the fabric of space and time. it flows as smooth as a silk sheet in a cool breeze. electrified and static as chaos remains.
NAKOR007 9 months ago
most scientists seem to forget where science actually came from......
NAKOR007 9 months ago
@NAKOR007 from where did it come from NAKOR?
xHappax 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xHappax the human mind... not the brain... it's all good to spit out facts, though reality consists of a lot more than just facts... i do not presume to be all knowing... but i know what i know is what i know... :)))
NAKOR007 8 months ago
What the grand majority of people don't realize is that the infinite universes out there ARE us! We send fractals of our own being to experience the different constructs of others universes that are literally made of us. An aspect of you is inside my universe, which I created, and an aspect of me is inside your universe. We are all just trying to learn how to be like each other. Currently we are learning the construct of light, and will soon be able to create our own light construct universes.
ranneyceth 9 months ago
This is the problem with science and logic, inherently based on the limited info of what can be percieved within this reality. They have confused the difference between other universes and other dimensions WITHIN this universe. There ARE infinite other universes out there, but they are not all made of the construct of light/sound/vibration. There are NOT infinite other parallel universes out there like this one, where you have lived out all the different choices in your current life.
ranneyceth 9 months ago
@ranneyceth could the multiverse be a multi dimensional fractal, comprised of dimensional vortex's... being that each vortex connects not only all the dimensions in a universe to each other, but to thier universe as well as connecting all the universes together allowing the size of the multiverse to be greater than itself while also containing laws of structure?
NAKOR007 9 months ago
@NAKOR007 Hard to answer this question without defining what a multiverse is. The grand majority of people in this scientific realm confuse other dimensional levels of THIS universe with actual other universes. Dimensional levels themselves, in this universe, are not ultimately connected by vortexes. They are only separated by the vibrational frequency of the energy in each level. To ascend to a higher dimensional level one merely increases the vibrational frequency of their consciousness.
ranneyceth 9 months ago
@ranneyceth sweet............ i'm totally down with accension...
NAKOR007 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NAKOR007 Bewarned, ranneyceth sounds a lot like deepak chopra. "To ascend to a higher dimensional level one merely increases the vibrational frequency of their consciousness" sounds like BS
altonator91 8 months ago
@ranneyceth ahah did you see kaku skating!?!!? that itself sent me into a greater place ROFL
GodlessMartyr666 9 months ago