I sympathise with Rorty's childhood experiences and the resulting desire to have domination over the people who dominate you. He is an inspiration for people suffering from resentful fantasies because he broke the cycle and recreated himself as someone opposed to domination and cruelty and for freedom and compassion.
@PavelSTL he can afford to be, he was already considered by then the greatest living philosopher....he could afford to say 'fuck you' to any validation of others
"shy, withdrawn, hoping to get away from school...being asocial...never made any friends...not easy in dealings with people...escaping others..scenes in nature, animals, birds..fantasies of power, control, omnipotence..acquiring intelectual power to get back at people..sense of mastery and control that you get out of philosophical ideas..need for domination"
sounds like somebody read nietzsche's zarathustra straight into his life but missed some very important lines like "life is a well of joy"
@vladaro but i don't think rorty missed out on those lines, he definitely saw more beauty in life, even than he lets on here. at least from what i can tell. it's got to be hard growing up feeling like you don't have control, i think he's just being honest
@ssarkis1 of course you're right, but my point was purely philosophical i guess, and could perhaps be put in this way as well, that it seems as if rorty read only one side of zarathustra, and completely missed the other side, which in fact is the side which is harder to read, which is what nietzsche himself or zarathustra constantly repeats, saying how gravity, weight, seriousness are hard (or even impossible) to oppose, especially for a philosopher...rorty is just a big mess in this interview
Really insightful. By the way, the New York Times just created a philosophy blog with Simon Critchley from the New School as the moderator; in the first post he describes a philosopher. But I think Rorty's essay "The Philosopher as Expert" is much more on target and seems more interesting. It is reprinted in the thirtieth-anniversary edition of Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.
Lulz, I went back school this year to finish my philosophy degree but taking strictly english courses. Time better spent carving many masks rather than attempting to shatter others.
I like how he ends this interview, he basically sums up the experience of most upper year philosophy courses were a bunch a of vain disgruntled students engage in a sort of 'I know best' conversational bloodsport. Well, there and youtube, I suppose.
Interesting insights into his psyche. I understand his point about not being able to come up with small talk. I just don't have the stomach nor the time for trivial BS. Life is too short to waste it talking about shoe color or complaining about the boss of a job you hate.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
So he more or less admits that he was a social loser in childhood and therefore he tried to compensate for his feelings of inadequacy by lusting after power through intellectual pursuits. His vacuous philosophic output reflects the unfulfilled need to dominate the world he hated.
Nice ad hominem! I feel truly privileged to have seen the intellectual powers of a superior rational individual in action. It's also good to see that you are not so lacking in compassion and understanding that you won't jump in to take advantage of a person when he is at his most vulnerable. Glad to see all those ethics lessons paid off, qtronman!
And looking to get back at people via intellectual power? And what he liked about his philosophy courses was that it gave a sense of domination... Wow. Is there no better way to dominate people than to undercut their sense of reality?
Note that Rorty is talking about his childhood and adolescence here. Fantasies of domination and control are surely common in children and young adults that are bullied and shuffled round from school to school.
Have you read Rorty's autobiographical essay 'Trotsky and the Wild Orchards' (in Philosophy and Social Hope)? There is much in it you will hate, but it would help you to put the above video into perspective and to see that Rorty's philosophical ideas were the result of genuine intellectual inquiry rather than an unbalanced character.
I sympathise with Rorty's childhood experiences and the resulting desire to have domination over the people who dominate you. He is an inspiration for people suffering from resentful fantasies because he broke the cycle and recreated himself as someone opposed to domination and cruelty and for freedom and compassion.
James3940 4 months ago 2
Interesting how greatness is born...
demonfelix 8 months ago
HA! "..turning out to be the unacknowledged son of the King, that sort of thing.."
Outthereandback 1 year ago
it takes a very intellectually mature and secure person to be honest like that.
PavelSTL 1 year ago 9
@PavelSTL he can afford to be, he was already considered by then the greatest living philosopher....he could afford to say 'fuck you' to any validation of others
carlo88moe 7 months ago
this is awesome, thanks for posting
ssarkis1 1 year ago
I had a similar childhood, but I became a rabid anti-communist.
TheFlanker35 1 year ago 2
"shy, withdrawn, hoping to get away from school...being asocial...never made any friends...not easy in dealings with people...escaping others..scenes in nature, animals, birds..fantasies of power, control, omnipotence..acquiring intelectual power to get back at people..sense of mastery and control that you get out of philosophical ideas..need for domination"
sounds like somebody read nietzsche's zarathustra straight into his life but missed some very important lines like "life is a well of joy"
vladaro 1 year ago
@vladaro but i don't think rorty missed out on those lines, he definitely saw more beauty in life, even than he lets on here. at least from what i can tell. it's got to be hard growing up feeling like you don't have control, i think he's just being honest
ssarkis1 1 year ago
@ssarkis1 of course you're right, but my point was purely philosophical i guess, and could perhaps be put in this way as well, that it seems as if rorty read only one side of zarathustra, and completely missed the other side, which in fact is the side which is harder to read, which is what nietzsche himself or zarathustra constantly repeats, saying how gravity, weight, seriousness are hard (or even impossible) to oppose, especially for a philosopher...rorty is just a big mess in this interview
vladaro 5 months ago
A need for domination? Oh yeah, a true philosopher...
toolesttool 1 year ago
This guy really needs a hug.
123gwf 1 year ago 16
Those school yard bullies are really going to get what was coming to them when Rorty's post-foundational utopia comes about.
Quidtimeam 1 year ago 5
@Quidtimeam The best revenge is a living a meaningful life.
That and a beaker of acid to the face, but he wasn't a science nerd, looks like.
Seleteles 1 year ago
Really insightful. By the way, the New York Times just created a philosophy blog with Simon Critchley from the New School as the moderator; in the first post he describes a philosopher. But I think Rorty's essay "The Philosopher as Expert" is much more on target and seems more interesting. It is reprinted in the thirtieth-anniversary edition of Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.
pmzavala 1 year ago
what an incredible sincere guy
santiago023 1 year ago
It's amazing how exceptionally unpretentious he is...
I mean, it's like, could such 'straight-talking' exist anywhere outside the U.S.?
Yet, at the same time, one craves a little bit of a mask... why do we love the masks we see others fashion for themselves?
Anyway, I really related to that statement about not being able to make small talk at parties =P
@brokennarcissist And that is exactly why I ended up switching my major from Philosophy to English at Berkeley =P
autumnlingo 2 years ago
Lulz, I went back school this year to finish my philosophy degree but taking strictly english courses. Time better spent carving many masks rather than attempting to shatter others.
brokennarcissist 1 year ago
I like how he ends this interview, he basically sums up the experience of most upper year philosophy courses were a bunch a of vain disgruntled students engage in a sort of 'I know best' conversational bloodsport. Well, there and youtube, I suppose.
brokennarcissist 2 years ago 5
This is the most dark insight into a person I have seen, in over a week.
hauntmeinharmony 2 years ago
I love how he seems reluctant to answer questions and then ends up answering the questoins so fully. He's aloof and engaged at the same time.
columbusclipper 2 years ago 3
Rorty is Dick Cheney's doppelganger (the good other half, of course).
renaldo999 3 years ago
Not even similar.
sosiopat 3 years ago
Whoa... What if some alchemist DIVIDED one person into Richard Rorty and Dick Cheney!
bananaslugpopsicle 2 years ago 2
he went to yale i think that says it all
truthtrekker 3 years ago
Interesting insights into his psyche. I understand his point about not being able to come up with small talk. I just don't have the stomach nor the time for trivial BS. Life is too short to waste it talking about shoe color or complaining about the boss of a job you hate.
I seek knowledge and truth.
Slavesrevolt 3 years ago
Irony in action.
samshipstone 3 years ago 5
This is one of the most interesting clips I've seen. Really intimate and real. Wonderful.
rootberg 3 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So he more or less admits that he was a social loser in childhood and therefore he tried to compensate for his feelings of inadequacy by lusting after power through intellectual pursuits. His vacuous philosophic output reflects the unfulfilled need to dominate the world he hated.
qtronman 3 years ago
Nice ad hominem! I feel truly privileged to have seen the intellectual powers of a superior rational individual in action. It's also good to see that you are not so lacking in compassion and understanding that you won't jump in to take advantage of a person when he is at his most vulnerable. Glad to see all those ethics lessons paid off, qtronman!
Kaaru 3 years ago
Taking advantage of? What the hell are you talking about? The man clearly said he is a power luster.
qtronman 3 years ago
As for "compassion and understanding," I wish far worse on Rorty than what I stated above.
qtronman 3 years ago
Fantasies of power and control? O.O
And looking to get back at people via intellectual power? And what he liked about his philosophy courses was that it gave a sense of domination... Wow. Is there no better way to dominate people than to undercut their sense of reality?
nine9s 3 years ago 2
Hi nine9s,
Note that Rorty is talking about his childhood and adolescence here. Fantasies of domination and control are surely common in children and young adults that are bullied and shuffled round from school to school.
Kaaru 3 years ago 2
Have you read Rorty's autobiographical essay 'Trotsky and the Wild Orchards' (in Philosophy and Social Hope)? There is much in it you will hate, but it would help you to put the above video into perspective and to see that Rorty's philosophical ideas were the result of genuine intellectual inquiry rather than an unbalanced character.
Kaaru 3 years ago 2
Rorty almost certainly had Schizoid Personality Disorder...like me.
You're an Objectivist? Long live Canaanite trafficking! Let us hope Hebraic morality can keep concupiscence in check!
Why you folks don't refer to yourselves simply as Liberals (in the 19th century sense), I'll never understand.
neothomist1275 3 years ago
please post more.
19562133 3 years ago
Thanks for posting this! Please post more soon.
creaturely 3 years ago 3
Thank you so much for posting this. Please post more!
groundless 3 years ago 3