Added: 3 years ago
From: webcameronuk
Views: 8,736
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Andrew Lansley - tosser Andrew Lansley - greedy Andrew Lansley - TOSSER!

  • bloody tosspot. fuck off lansley

  • Andrew Landsley. You are a Tosser.

  • Lansley is a disgrace

  • "The Most important thing to me is that while we have our time in opposition, we ruin everything. And make David's mates shit loads of MONEY!"

  • Why did we vote the tories in...should have stayed labour! FUCK! What stupid bastards voted conservative!

  • Lansley, greedy Andrew Lansley. TOSSER!

  • @blipdriver the NHS is not for sale you Gray haired mangy codger

  • Fuck off libcon

  • GREEEEEEEDY TOSSSSSEERRRRRRRRR!!!

  • Fornicate off.

  • Andrew Lansley greedy Andrew Lansley TOSSER!

  • This man is such a dog fucker

  • And fuck you again

  • Fuck you

  • TOSSER!

  • NO MORE LIES.........! 

  • Bullshit. I am sorry but I think what makes this worse is the fact he is pretending he cares. In the American system your insurance company chooses the 'best option' for you. When you had your stroke Lansley would you have wanted a suit dictating what treatment to give you? I don;t think so. It is fine for you to rely on the NHS when you need it but as soon as you're better it seems none of that matters. The NHS is a great system so stay the fuck away from it.

  • TORY SCUM

  • get rid of targets you monkey codger and let patients wait for 10 hours in a and e departments and die in waiting rooms? you know shit. you lying stealing pig.

  • Lansley = FAKE CUNT.

  • THE NHS IS NOT FOR SALE

  • Andrew Lansley what a cunt

  • the nhs is not for sale. lansley you fuckwit

  • TRUST me, dumbass, you DO NOT want to be more like us here in the States. Privatization will KILL people, just like it does here.

  • They are going to defund and de skill the NHS.

    Don't trust this man!!!

  • This mother fucker wants to sell of the NHS so that he and his mates can make a nice tidy little profit.

    He is lying to you. He does not give a fuck about you.

    He wants to institute an American style system and that would leave, in the long run, a lot of people without proper coverage.

    Competition sounds like a good thing. It really means a multi tiered system with some people receiving appalling care.

  • Actually the best BS was saved for last Margaret Thatcher made promises and delivered is rubbish. MArgaret Thatcher got in power with the slogan "Labour isnt working" with 1.4m unemployed. She made over 3 million people unemployed and asset sripped the country.

  • Andrew Lansley has just got Pepsi, KFC and McDonalds to advise on Obesity. HE gets paid more money from these companies than from being in government. He is an out and out crook

  • lets keep the nhs and mke it better

  • good man

  • Sorry I missed the bit about abolishing PCTs

  • Possible for Shadow Secretary introduce Polygraph? Least legislation allow Scottish courts hold honest men & women. Suffer from assault, from more than one NHS staff member at Dykebar Hospital. No MSP, no MP taken any notice. Cannot be only one. Contact UK Polygraph Services 00.01 no deception.

  • under this labour government, the over 60s are entitled to free eye tests obviously its of some interest to me as my father is a recipient of this treatment, my question is would the conservatives if they form the next government keep this policy or scrap it? i speak as someone who as david cameron describes himself as a liberal conservative.

  • Cannot wait for your conference - hopefully you are going to show the people the light - Brown Labour is destroying this country - Come on you Tories!!!!!

  • Sort out obesity!

  • This is just a test to see if the Tory party allows comments without having to approve them first.

  • What ever happened to Heathcliff Mugabe Brown's "big clunking fist"?.

    Gone a bit Limp has it!, hey I know how to kick start the Ecconomy lets use our Gold reserves-oh I forgot it was sold off when it was at it's lowest rate.The Monkeys at Woburn safari park can do a better Job than the Plebs we got at the moment.

  • Dear Andrew

    Please allow all women to have access to a female doctor if they ever want to. That doesn't seem to be the case around here unless they changed to a different practice further away.

    Your message here is good and should be well received I would have thought. 'Old for New' Labour is biting the dust, it seems rather than 'Grasping the nettle' as you are doing.

  • why would your request be that only women get to see a doctor of the same gender?

    surely male or female patients should be able to chose a doctor of the same gender, or should women get special treatment?

  • I agree with you. Sometimes when making a point, one forgets to include all sides. Thanks for reminding me of this valuable point which you make.

  • Well said, the NHS needs to work more around the people,also the NHS is in need of better funding.

  • The NHS gets enough funding, its a black hole for funding.

    n a few years one out of every two pounds in tax will be thrown into that socialist fire. They should just make it means tested, and let those who can afford it opt out.

  • but then you would just have the centre-right middle class complaining that they are paying for those who cannot afford private health care. how would it be funded in an opt-out scheme? besides who is going to opt for expensive private health care over free health care, especially if the nhs can be fixed?

  • It's certaintly not cheap or free, just because you're blind to it with our smoke and mirrors tax system, doesn't mean you're not paying through the nose for it.

    It really shouldn't be the role of government or the people to pay for someone elses health. The National Health Service hemorrhages money needs to be reformed.

    If 40% of the nation opted out, tax would be lowered across the board because less people would need public healthcare. Making the NHS more managable for those who do need it.

  • and needs*

  • well ok but the 40% who would opt-out would presumably be the wealthier part of society who pay the most tax, which i believe is right although it has to kept to a reasonable level. but if these opted out and would therefore not have to pay tax on the nhs anymore how would those most in need pay for it? would we not just slide back to how it used to be before the nhs and similar measures that came before it where the poor cannot afford basic health care? services would decrease, as would quality

  • I think that the 40% who earn over £34,600 pay about 40% to the government in tax. Which in my opinion far too steep. That bracket purchase more taxed goods, which makes up for the difference anyway.

    I'm not saying they won't have to pay for the NHS, I'm saying that there will be less tax to pay because overall there will be less people using the services.

    Then the government can focus its funding on the smaller portion of the polity who need healthcare but who genuinely can't afford it.

  • - Which is in my opinion far too steep.

  • i don't think that's really workable. if 40% opt-out of the nhs then they will, in fairness, not want to pay for it. also it will lead to a large cut in services if less people are useing it leaving tousands stranded for healthcare in rural areas especially. it's better to keep the nhs for all so it is a level playing field and everybody receives the same oppotunity. spending a little less on the armed forces may be a start by pulling out of the fabricated war on terror.

  • I can tell your not much of a conservative. That's a very liberal position. A pragmatist would rather defence spending be high than the NHS. Like I said, its a socialist framework - a nasty little piece of the 20th century, that's long over due for the chop.

    It sounds like you're a liberal. Then I'm sorry I wasted my time.

  • no i'm not a conservative and yes i suppose you could call me a liberal, although a liberal and a socialist in economic terms are two very different viewpoints. anyway let me just point you to the usa, where health care is near entirely privatized and where people actually die because they cannot afford care. that tragically is what we would expect from the 3rd world not the us. waiting times can have the same effect here but that can be fixed.

  • I'm a classic-liberal, in Thatcherite terms, or a conservative liberatarin. Small government, low taxes, anti welfarism, strong defence, free market... and so forth.

    I understand the difference between socialist and a modernliberal, except the lines are blurred when it comes to welfarism.

    Anyway, like I said - I'm wasting my time convincing you against the welfare state. And your wasting your time convincing me about socialised medicine et cetera.

    Good day.

  • you're wasting your time.

  • I guess you're rich or at least well-off enough to support your position. Fair enough having an opinion, but "a nasty little piece of the 20th century"- rubbish; millions have benefited instead of the few.

    I hope you lose your job, all your land and property is lost, all your society-conscious friends desert you, and you get a taste of the real world. Then we'll see who's in favour of universal healthcare. Good day.

  • Charming. If you actually read what I've said, you'd say that I was in favour of free healthcare - the poor and the elderly - but NOT in favour of free healthcare for those who could afford health insurance. It should be means tested.

  • And frankly you've been just as rude to other people; "I'm sorry I wasted my time", so why should I cater for your sensibilities when you show no respect for others?

  • QUOTE "I'm not saying they won't have to pay for the NHS, I'm saying that there will be less tax to pay because overall there will be less people using the services.

    Then the government can focus its funding on the smaller portion of the polity who need healthcare but who genuinely can't afford it."

  • But the people who can afford private care are the ones who use private care at the moment. The only way in which your plan would lower spending is if the threshold was set artificially low so many middle-class are forced to pay for private treatment; worsening their position in favour of the rich. Effectively the middle class would end up paying twice.

  • I didn't ask for your opinion, you jumped in with your fangs bared. The dialogue I had between the other fellow was almost two weeks ago. So the next time you reply with tears, playing the worlds smallest violin, I shant bother.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more