Added: 3 years ago
From: julianhayda
Views: 13,262
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (305)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • More than a coincidence that the greatest mass murders of ALL TIME have been communists. Hitler was a socialist (national SOCIALIST workers party), Nazi. Theortically, communism can only be achieved by way of socialism; never seen communism, unless by that one means murdered multitudes.

  • People need to understand, mass exterminations are a fundamental principle of Marxism. Marx talks about geneocide (though the actual word didn't exist yet) brazenly in his writings. Actually the mass extermination of Russians was enthusiastically promoted by Marx. It is no irony that the Bolshevik gang which was put in power by the old German High Command in WWI did precisely what Marx said they should do. Mass extermination is a central Marxist principle.

  • @VictorLepanto

    Please cite the communist manifesto. I have read it twice, and I didn't read anything that had to do with genocidal principles.

  • @julianhayda: A wee bit of advise on how best to understand Marx. That absolute LAST thing you read to understand Marx is the Manifesto, & Hell no to the Kapital nonsense. Start w/ Judenfrage & then read anything else he or Engels wrote in their periocical articles about race, ethnic groups, peasants or especially Jews or Russians. Believe me, he wanted them all GONE.

  • Grain production was not the issue in this man-made genocide. Neither was drought or poor planning or collective farms. Archives show the farms had plenty of product, Stalin and his cohorts requisitioned ALL foodstuffs, as planned. Ukraine has never regained what was taken, hundreds of villages, with their inhabitants, disappeared altogether. Estimates are wide rangeing, somewhere between 5-12 million perished. This happens when a people wishes freedom from communist tyranny and 1 party rule.

  • Nope, archives shows there was no hollowdomore.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober Russian archives have a history of being purged with each new leader. They are not the same as archives in the West. Many kings of Russia have even been purged from Russian archives.

    Tom David

    Minneapolis

  • Best proof that Russian archives does not substantiate Stalin´s 60 millions victi... no waite, it was 110 millions victims! Or is it 82 millions?

    "But archives can be used to proove anything" "Archives where closed by teh evil KGB-spawn Putin, who want to kill all estonians."

    The thing is, those archives where never meant to become open to the public.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober The Russian archives were never meant to be open to the public because they contain evidence of the most brutal crimes ever committed on Earth!

    Tom David

    Minneapolis

  • Right, Stalin ate estonian babies for breakfast.

    Nevermind that the hollowdomore numbers would implie half of the (moscovite, bolchevik-created) ukrainian socialist sovietic republic being simply empty, with hundreds if not thousands of masse graves the like of Katyn that Goebbel´s media machine would have used well 8 years later.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober The Germans were already recruiting tens of thousands of Ukrainians to fight against the Communists, both in vlassov's Army and as Hiwis", or "helpers" to the German Wehrmacht- all because of Communist brutality.

    Tom David

    Minneapolis

  • Tens of thousands, would be big in estonia or Luxembourg...

    It isn´t that I´m against everything National-Socialist but in this case, Goebbels and the gestapo where simply making things up to justifie the coming "liberation" of this region, which was to be incorporated into greater Germany.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober So all the witnesses that you can find even here on YouTube were lying? They are exactly saying outrageous things like that they were being turned into soap and lampshades, you know! Even Andrei Chickatilo, the mass murderer, talked about the Holodomir.

    Tom David

    Minneapolis

  • Witnesses over teh intrenets? Seriously dude? :-D

    The soaps and lampshades might be a reality thou, except not backward in time but forward, in a future brought about by Tel-Aviv´s own genocidal actions.

    Pravda?

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober Witnesses from anywhere. As I say, even the serial killer Andrei Chickatilo talked about it- about his own brother having been killed and eaten during the Holodomir. And he was a committed Communist!

    Tom David

    Minneapolis

  • If I wanted pity or so broke I had to eat rats killed by poison to avoid starving, like countless pensioners in the post-sovietic "democracies", I would probably be a witness too.

    Even in 1980s ethiopia and other african countries, you don´t see the blacks butchering their childrens en mass for meat, thought they have loads and loads of them.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober There are TONS of photographs online about it as well, like one where two peasants are standing in front of a table upon which are the remains of two children- a ghastly image which sticks in my mind. But Andrei Chickatilo had nothing to gain from telling about how his brother was eaten, so I don't see how you can even make that argument. And Africans are well fed by the West, leading to a population explosion- they are not "starving" like the Ukrainians were!

    Tom David

  • Those photos are of things that was a decade earlier, Volga famine and in general, the war in the former Russian Empire between Reds and Whites.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober Watch the video, "Harvest of Despair." And during 1921-2 the Ukrainians were starved then as well as grain was exported from there to feed the people in the Volga region. The man-made famine of 1932-3 is even well documented in the British archives and admit that up to 10 million people were deliberately starved but that it was best to not openly discuss it as they wanted normalized relations with Moscow.

    Tom David

    Minneapolis

  • Wasn´t it that Stalin allegely admitted to Churchill that 10 millions.? Version always changes.

    It would leave circa half the ukrainian SSR empty.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober I have never heard that one, but I think the traditional numbers accepted are 7 million in the Ukraine, and three milliion elsewhere at the same time- the Caucauses and the Crimea.

    Tom David

    Minneapolis

  • @TomDavid88 Yea, I've read about that bullshit. Some minister of former Ukrainian gvt wrote about 7mlns of victims, BUT among these 7 mlns he counted 5 mlns NOT BORN BABIES!!!! Which could be born, but weren't! And in the "Book of Holodomor" they could gather only less than 1(one) million of names, from which very many were proved false.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober nope, honesty and sense shows there's no integrity in the comments of Friedegg13thOktober. guess you're betting folks will believe a bigger lie than a small one. rock on

  • watch?v=miHw4egKbZA

  • Fraud, Famine and Fascism

    The Ukrainian Genocide Myth from Hitler to Harvard

    by Douglas Tottle

    Published 1987 in Canada

    rationalrevolution.n  et/special/library/famine.h tm

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober 1987? Seriously!!! Obviously, you can't find anything of merit after the fall of the Soviet Union (or, should that be called 'the fall of Russian propaganda')!!!!

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober Oh, ya, the Ukrainians just happily gave up their farms without any resistance? Is that what your Communist mind is trying to tell us?!

    Tom David

    Minneapolis

  • Comment removed

  • Google The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet influence on American post war policy By John Dietrich. The German people were also starved. Millions died. Morgenthau was Jewish

  • Funny thing, on the sole side three professional trolls hired by capitalists: irynski, MsOKZS and chickenwrench. May be the topic is very important for US.

  • @tagaphon

    I'm sad that you judge everyone by your actions & thus you would never understand how someone could post just because of their own convictions & the national memory they carry in their blood.

    I do it for my parents who lived and survived this horror. I will never forget.

    People like you do not have motherland no matter were they live. There is the name for like you: "mankurts" (The legend of the mankurt essentially described how to create ideal slaves by erasing their memories.)

  • @MsOKZS And there is a good name for those like you: Judas. For money you'd sell your mother in Turkish bordell. Your God is American dollar. You live and lie for him. As well as your parents who lived and murdered for Reichsmarks. You may hide in your beloved US but that's not forever and you'll meet your parents were they are now - in Hell for killing Poles, Russians and Jews for Hitler.

  • @tagaphon Your comment is my proof. When you have no argument you go to assaults and insults.

    You may try to say you know God but your comment shows you don't now God nor you know what was Christ's message. Nevertheless I pray for your soul to be saved, as despite the fact how angry and evil your actions are you are still God's child and Christ came to save you as much as me.

  • @MsOKZS That's too late to pray for you. 30 silver coins were already taken. As far I know Christ never forgave Judas. So you'll meet your daddy so or so. One thing is sure: he'll never catch cold where he is.

  • @tagaphon Ненавидящих и обидящих нас прости Господи и даруй им царствие твое. Библию читайте, так как судя по вашему коментарию, вы ее совсем не знаете. А от имени Господа выступать и наказания присуждать вам не гоже, это богохульство, а богохульство это грех.

    Желаю вам всего наилучшего.

  • @MsOKZS Не могу ответить тем же. Я не желаю добра ни тебе, ни твоим братьям бандеровцам, позору украинского народа. Никто из вас не раскаялся, и каждый из таких, как ты, снова готов заливать кровью Украину. С таким же лицемерием и показной набожностью как у тебя. И живешь ты, только потому, что США спрятали выродков-твоих родителей от народного гнева. Всего тебе плохого.

  • dog eat c

    07:18

    c eat dog

    08:42

  • russians did this to ukriane.

  • Sounds like MsOKZS knows the facts about this tragedy very well. I guess one doesn't have to stoop to derision when truth is the reference.

  • @chickenwretch

    Thank you. I know it way too well. Bothy my parents lived through it. Told the stories that makes you blood chill, like for example after NKVD repossessed everything (and I mean EVERYTHING) you can eat, they were standing in a circle around villages and killed everyone who tried to live to go find some food. You were prosecuted put to jail or Gulag if you take THREE spikes of grain. etc, etc, etc.

  • In his 1953 speech the "father of the [UN] Genocide Convention," Dr Raphael Lemkin described "the destruction of the Ukrainian nation" as the "classic example of genocide," for "...the Ukrainian is not and never has been a Russian... It is a case of genocide, of the destruction of a culture and a nation.."

    at uccla website his document: SOVIET_GENOCIDE_IN_THE_UKRAINE­­.

  • In his 1953 speech the "father of the [UN] Genocide Convention," Dr Raphael Lemkin described "the destruction of the Ukrainian nation" as the "classic example of genocide," for "...the Ukrainian is not and never has been a Russian. His culture, his temperament, his language, his religion, are all different...to eliminate (Ukrainian) nationalism...the Ukrainian peasantry was sacrificed...a famine was necessary for the Soviet and so they got one to order..

  • 7 Aug. 1932 law drafted by Joseph Stalin on the protection of the socialist property stipulated the death penalty for "theft of socialist property". Ukrainian villagers were executed by firing squads for theft of a sack of wheat and in some cases even for two sheaves of corn or a husk of grain.

    6 Dec. 1932 decree stipulated a complete blockade of villages for allegedly sabotaging the grain procurement campaign - de facto sentencing their Ukrainian inhabitants to execution by starvation.

  • for fact people dont accuse jews but comunistes god damn those jews are dooing a damn good work!

  • Fuck russian fascism!

  • @Ms73501505 its zionisme ......... jews

  • @Ms73501505 , "Russian fascism"? This was 100% Communism! Our main enemy for 45 yrs after WW2? The Communist party of the USSR were made up of 80% jews in the power positions. Politicians, police capos, judges, etc. all jewish. When the "purges" happened, it wasn't synagogues that got destroyed, but 1000yr old Orthodox Christian churches. It wasn' jews in he gulags. It was Christian RUssians. Groups like ADL, SPLC, WJO, etc. made sure we never learn of their genocides by censoring text books.

  • @mondocrat The synagogues were closed and Judaism repressed like any other religion. so learn your facts. Considering what the 'christians" did to the Jews in Russia and Ukraine for centuries, NO sympathy for churches turned into stables and swimming pools.

  • @NativeNewYorkGuy

    "The synagogues were closed and Judaism repressed. Considering what the 'christians" did to the Jews in Russia and Ukraine for centuries " -

    You are so wrong. Judaism was living/growing in Ukraine for centuries. Hasidim took it's biggest development there. I n Ukraine are some of the biggest Jewish sacred places. It couldn't happen if Judaism was repressed there for centuries. What was done to Jews before 1917 " Pogroms" - were a result of Russian Imperial politics of 19c.

  • @NativeNewYorkGuy

    "The synagogues were closed and Judaism repressed like any other religion." - this is not true either. After 1917 October revolution all religions were repressed the same. And, if to be honest, many Soviet Bolsheviks who came to the power in 1917 were Jews. They didn't care for their own culture and religion. They were the one who were destroying synagogues along with churches. As well as other communists (of all nations). They were people without religion and culture.

  • watch?v=miHw4egKbZA

  • Comment removed

  • stop posting crap! the only thing 'exposed' is you - hiding behind numerous youtube accounts: irynski, Riaflower, ukrainianmusicvideo, slavicstudies

    see the dialog between 'ukrainianmusicvideo' and 'watcherwatcher' on another youtube clip:watch?v=cD0XZlxKuig

  • Thanks to DrMundo's having used this video as a forum for espousing his personal theories & that which he considers to be 'facts', the integrity of julianhayda's post has been usurped by spurious derision. I suggest that - as he considers himself to be an irrefutable authority - he creates his own video of the History/Ethnology/Linguistics (ad nauseum) of the region to present his 'facts'. It would be fascinating to see how well his grab-bag stands up under scrutiny.

  • Kinda weird that all the pictures of the "ukrainian famine" are the same as pictures of the famines caused by international intervention in 1919 and continuation of the red-white war into the former Russian Empire.

    Weird or because the hollowdomore is nothing but a myth, created by the gestapo and spread by william hearst?

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober The Famine of 1932-33 in the Ukraine is a fact as well as in other regions of the Soviet Union at the time - regardless of ethnicity.

    ETHNIC genocide is a monstrous lie.

    Especially cynical are pictures of starving Russian children and dead bodies in Volga region they use in this anti-Russian propaganda.

  • @irynski I didn't play with him. I even corrected him if you noticed. The Famine is a fact. Ethnic genocide is a lie.

  • @DrMundo74 How can I take you seriously? You were probably writing to yourself! You are Fridaey13txhOctober, LeninKGB, craxial666, etc. You a troll working for the Russification of the world, you bastard. (Thank you DrMundo74 for giving me an insight into how you function. I'll be calling this DrMundoism in future: how debate when you're incapable of debate; accuse everyone who disagrees with your perceptions as being one person and call them bitches, bastards and trolls.) You are pathetic.

  • @irynski Madame,

    Why can't you find a more pacific hobby (how about promoting ukrainian soup "borsch") instead of fighting "Russification of the World" (as you put it lol) from your other YouTube accounts: Riaflower, slavicstudies, ukrainianmusicvideo, etc or making racist remarks from Karen41872 pretending to be a 24 year old "filmmaker" from Beverly Hills?

  • p.s. The word "bastard" used by you below I did not use...

  • @DrMundo74 No, but I can't call you a bitch - which is what you called me. It's a great reflection on your character that you stoop to calling me a troll, accuse me of using a variety of accounts, etc. What foolishness you resort to. You're one of those people who would happily resort to violence in order to 'teach' someone else that you're right and they're wrong.

  • @irynski You live in Australia, I think, I in US now, though I was born in Kyiv. DrMundo74 accused me the same. How they as he are afraid that there are many of us.

  • @MsOKZS Haha! There are too many of us to make the lies they've been taught comfortable. It is always easier to understand conspiracy theories when the truth is too difficult to live with. To people like DrMundo74, the idea that there are so many of us whose families, and friends of our families, died is inconceivable. I could almost feel sorry for him if he weren't such a parasite. He wants to believe the world is black & white. My family is from the Poltava region. Vs'oho naikrashchoho!

  • The hollowdomore is nothing but a myth, created by the gestapo and spread by yellow rags mogul william hearst.

  • Comment removed

  • It is ironic you believe the propaganda of the 3rd Reich, which you hate so much, Goebbels certainly wasn´t slacking. :-D

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober LOL! You're like a dog with a bone... I have far more respect for the likes of DrMundo. At least he has some semblance of intellect.

    Speaking of semblance, I suspect that you were assembled with your arse for a brain. Sadly, your brain was lost in your nappies when you were a baby (probably about 10, maybe 15, years ago).

    Let it go. You're stuck in your tragic world of black & white propaganda. Don't bother me again. You're just plainly stupid & boring.

  • Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prize winner who spent 8 years in Gulag labor camps in Siberia and 3 years in exile and who is hardly a "Communist regime sympathizer" wrote about the Holodomor campaign in 2008:

    "This provocateurs outcry about "genocide" began to emerge decades later - first secretly, in the musty chauvinistic minds, viciously opposed to "Muscovites" - and now ascended to government circles of today's Ukraine, to surpass even the dashing swirls of Bolshevik propaganda "

  • 8 years for high treason? He should have gotten the Rosenberg treastement.

  • @Fridaey13txhOktober He was accused for his criticism of Stalin. Not the point. Point is the most famous dissident ever, a Nobel prize winner called Holodomor myth of genocide a lie. His mother was Ukrainian by the way and lived through the Famine of 1932-33...

  • @DrMundo74 (wiki/Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn) "Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was born in Kislovodsk, RSFSR (now in Stavropol Krai, Russia) in 1918. His mother, Taisiya Solzhenitsyna (née Shcherbak) was Ukrainian. During World War I, Taisiya went to Moscow to study. While there she met and married Aleksandr's father. Solzhenitsyn was brought up in Rostov on the Don. My mother & babtsia were also Ukrainian & lived through Holodomor... & they were IN Ukraine. Not everyone died. His opinion is purely opinion.

  • @irynski Yes,thank you for the quote from Wikipedia. I'm sure your opinion is of greater value than Nobel Prize winner Aleksander Solzhenitsyn's.

  • DON'T play at semantics with me! You know dribs & drabs & are certainly no ethnographer. Ukrainians might just as well have been called Mohairs by your definitions. Moscovia was renamed Russia (1547) in order to lay claims to the earlier Empire of Rus'. Khmel'nytskiy try to form an alliance with your 'Russia' believing that, as fellow Greco-Orthodox, an alliance against non-Orthodox ethnic groups plundering 'Mohairia' was necessary for survival. He was wrong. Muscovites were treacherous liars.

  • @irynski I'm not a "Muscovite". "Early Empire of Rus" are historic Russian Lands - Ruska Zemlya. Kiev was the second capital of Rus after Novgorod. After the fall of Kiev to Mongols and it's annihilation the lands around Kiev were absorbed by Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and given the name "Ukrajna" (land on the edge of the Kingdom) as well as other "ukrainas" - Podol, Wolyn, etc. What "dribs and drabs" you talking about?

    There were no "Ukrainians" until 19th century. It's just a fact.

  • Comment removed

  • @irynski Moscow was founded by Yuri Dolgorukiy who was Grand Prince of Kiev in 1147 and became the major city of Rus after the fall of Kiev to mongols in 1240 and it's annexation by Polish-Lithuanian Kingdom. Even before that another Russian city of Vladimir-Suzdal was already the major power of Rus. "Moscovia" is how the Grand Duchy of Moscow was called by Poland that occupied Russian lands. There was no Ukrainian State or "Nation" in sight back then. What's this nonsense about "mohair" about?

  • @DrMundo74 The 'nonesense' you're referring to is to point out that, disregarding when the term 'Ukraine' came in, a distinct ethnic group lived on those lands. What they are called throughout history is irrelevant & does not negate their existence: people with their own culture & their own language. It is the victors who write history. The fact that we were sandwiched between Poland & Russia who needed us (The Breadbasket of Europe) was our great tragedy. We existed & continue to exist!

  • @irynski "Breadbasket of Europe" ))) Except for the cities from the Early Russian times much of the territory was a Wild Field (steppe) before it became part of Russian Empire

  • @DrMundo74 I ve happened to witness your heated debate with Irynski and iam pleased with the way you put ukraine obsessed rusophobes in their place,do you speak russian?

  • @LeninKGB

    Nah, not really heated...She's kinda inconsistent...Too many accounts I guess

    Answering your question - I sure do. Not a huge fan of Lenin and KGB though :)

  • @DrMundo74 а чего же канал закрыл?:)Большим фанатом лично Ульянова я тоже не являюсь,просто выбрал этот ник как способ выражения патриотических и про-советских взглядов:)

    Да,и согласен что госпожа Ирински хоть и не лишена задора,фактами почему то оперирует не часто.

  • @LeninKGB She's just a bitch writing under her many aliases: Karen41872; Riaflower; irynski; slavicstudies, ukrainianmusicvideo...etc,etc

  • @DrMundo74 You paranoid, foolish man!

  • @DrMundo74 As noted to LenininKGB, I am not going to reference Ukrainian or non-Russian sources as I know I will be pounced upon as espousing Ukrainian fascist, anti-Semitic, anti-everything propaganda. I can't reference independent Western research as I am, then, pounced on for espousing corrupt US sponsored lies based on their agenda. Who, then, can I reference when trying to hold a reasonable discussion? That's why I'm cursing myself for being stupid enough to enter into a dialogue here.

  • @irynski Well, I don't know how to help you. Perhaps, just be critical...

  • @DrMundo74 Not too many accounts on my behalf... Too many postings by you. Each time I receive a barrage of comments from you I can't even find them for the other comments you've posted to no one. This is not a serious forum. Snippets of information don't form a basis on which to have an intelligent, academic discussion. Again, I curse myself for even attempting to hold a discussion with you on any level.

  • @irynski

    Open Wikipedia and read about Ukrainian language:

    "It is accepted that before the 18th century the precursor to the modern literary Ukrainian language was a vernacular language used mostly by peasants... as no traces of earlier literary works could be found"

    West Ukraine was part of Poland for centuries - hence 4,000+ Polish words in "mova".

    Other than that Ukrainian language is not much different from common Russian. Dutch is more different from Afrikaans.

  • @DrMundo74 I already did and cited the reference to a translator being needed at Pereiaslov! It is evident to all that I am trying to discuss something with a dear, one-eyed man. Your quote is taken out of context, plus you have appended the ".. part of Poland.. hence 4,00+ Polish words.." from your own mind or somewhere else. Read the article properly. Various theories are attributed, particularly by Russian scientists, which have been refuted. Peasant language? Written language was banned!!!

  • @irynski You want me to give you all Polish words in West Ukrainian "mowa" never to be found in any document of Ancient Rus? It'll be a long list LOL

    Written language was banned for centuries? Not a single Ancient Ukrainian patriot jotted a few lines in "forbidden language" for centuries?!!!

  • @irynski Oh please please! Where can I read about "The Translator"? What was his name? Did he translate from the "forbidden language"? Is it documented in the "forbidden language"?

    Btw It's PereiaslAv or Pereiaslav-Poltavskyi, now - Pereyaslav Khmelnitskyi (Also known as Pereyaslav-Russki - as it is mentioned for the first time in the text of the Rus' treaty with the Byzantine Empire (911) - terrible isn't it?)

    ,

  • @DrMundo74 Again, The Translator is referenced in the article YOU pointed me to in Wikipedia. Ukrainian_language > Developments under Poland and Lithuania > By the mid-17th century, the linguistic divergence between the Ukrainian and Russian languages was so acute that there was a need for translators during negotiations for the Treaty of Pereyaslav, between Bohdan Khmelnytsky, head of the Zaporozhian Host, and the Russian state. LOOK AT IT. You cited the page! Read ALL of it, blind man!

  • @irynski You already wrote that. I just hope someone will correct this BS. Khmelnitsky was a well-educated person and could speak Polish, Latin and even Turkish and Tatar. Russian? Of course! Khmelnitskyi letters in Russian are preserved.

    "Кому мила вера благочистивая, от поляков на унию претворяемая, кому за вас любима целостность отчизны нашей , украины Малороссийской..."(Белоцерковс­кий универсал, 1648 год)

    He couldn't write in Ukrainian that appeared 200 years later...

  • Cossacks wrote to Kmelnitskyi on Jan 3 1654: "А замысел вашь добь удаться и буде а всемъ народамъ малороссийскимъ по обеимъ сторонамь Днепра будучимъ, под протекцию Великодержавнейшаго и Пресветлейшаго монарха Российского, заслушны быть признаемъ и даемо нашу войсковую вамь параду, а быстё того дела не оставляли и оное кончили, яку наилучший пользе отчизне Малороссийской. "

  • Then again, event though Khmelnitskyi was in service to Polish Crown before the Uprising and all upper classes spoke mostly pure Polish ("hetman" was a Polish title) why would he converse with Russian Tzar Alexei whom he plead for Protectorate and unification of Little Rosia with Great Rosia for several years (The Tzar did not want to start a new war with the Poles) in anything other then Russian which he knew quite well???

  • @DrMundo74 -- "hetman" is actually a TURKISH term.

  • @Karen41872 Polish "hetman", Czech "hejtman", German "hauptmann" (headman).

    Cossack (Cherkes) "ataman" is rather from Turkish ata-man (ata="grandfather", man="me") or Tatar (ata=father, taman=host,army) Originally Cossacks are of mixed ethnic origins:Kasog, Cherkes, Sarmatian, Tatar,Turkic,etc -The Wild Field, that mixed with the remaining Slavic Russian people after the Golden Horde and became Christian. Polish title of Hetman was founded in1505. In the Registered Cossack Army - end of the16c.

  • Comment removed

  • @DrMundo74 Incidentally, while I, personally, have not flagged your pseudo-scientific diatribes and 'facts' as spam, it appears that plenty of people have. You are a dangerously ignorant, obviously self-taught Russophile who would never be able to hold his own in a true debate. As I pointed out earlier, you even hide behind a hidden profile because you are such a sad coward. I won't indulge you any longer as I have better things to do with my time. Apparently, you have not.

  • @irynski thanks for "not indulding"!

  • @DrMundo74 PS No more wasting time on you. I just wanted to clarify that 'dear, one-eyed man' was a typo. Please read as being a 'deaf, one-eyed man'. You reference articles on the web (try doing some reading outside of the web!) without knowing who wrote them and aren't even aware of the names and agenda of those who are attributed to known 'historian/chroniclers' (using these terms loosely). You pick single paragraphs out of entire articles and take them out of context. Finita la musica!

  • @irynski What's the difference between "on the web" and "outside the web"?

  • @DrMundo74 Wikipedia is hardly a serious source. Little in the way of original documentation can be sourced via the web. Academic papers/texts of any depth cannot be sourced from the web. It's a grab-bag of tiny chunks of subjective opinion and misinformation. Try to do some original research from a library or read some acknowledged academic research only available at the moment in printed form!

  • @DrMundo74 Since you are so fond of citing Wikipedia, take a look at the Russian entries for Украинский язык and Русский язык. Tell me where either claim that Ukrainian is not a language but a dialect, therefore there is no such ethnic group as Ukrainians. Read the articles CAREFULLY. I know you are predisposed to tunnel vision and focus only on phrases and clauses that suit your purposes.

  • @irynski I don't really have any "purposes". I just commented that this "ethnic genocide" propaganda is a sickening bunch of lies and you started this etnographic discussion..

    What "purposes" you imply I have?

  • Russian and Ukrainian are no more different than Dutch and Afrikaans if you take all Polish words out of Ukrainian (which you will never find in any document of Ancient Rus). After Mongol pogrom and annexation of West Russian lands by Lithuania-Poland Western Russian underwent Polonization. Of course they spoke different from Greater Russia. That is how Ukrainian “mova” emerged.

    Written Ukrainian appeared only in the19 c. The codification of Ukrainian wasn't complete even by Bolsheviks in 1927

  • @DrMundo74 Tell your theory to a linguist and they'll laugh at you!

  • @DrMundo74 The very word "Ukraine", however, is much older than Russia itself. It was first used in the 12th century chronicles when the powerful Kyivan Rus' state stretched over the territories of modern Ukraine, Moldova, Russia, Belorus and the Baltics. The name was apparently in use earlier. It's roots can be found in the modern Ukrainian language, which still retains the word "ukraity" meaning "to mark out": it is the antithesis of what you postulate. 'U' designates WITHIN the 'edges'.

  • You can find the Russian Primary Chronicles on the internet:

    webDOTkuDOTedu/~russcult/cultu­­re/handouts/chronicle_allDOTh­t­ml

    (Selections from the Russian Primary Chronicle translated by Samuel H. Cross and published in Harvard Studies and Notes in Philology and Literature, Volume 12, 1930)

  • "Kievan Rus" is the term introduced by Russian historian Karamzin only in the 19 c to describe the period of RUSSIAN state in 10-12 centuries when of all Russian cities Kiev was the major political center of Rus, until it was destroyed by Mongols in 1240 and later absorbed by Polish-Lithuanian Kingdom.

    However, Rus begins from NOVGOROD. It is from Novgorod Prince Oleg of Rus came to Kiev, made it his new capital and called it "The Mother of Russian Cities" (not Ukrainian).

  • The fact that now Kiev is the capital of the country called Ukraine existing since 1991 does not change RUSSIAN history, just like Istanbul being now in Turkey does not change that Constantinople was the capital of Christian Byzantine Empire. Already before the fall of Kiev to mongols in 1240 political center of Rus moved to Vladimir-Suzdal (Look in Wikipedia : Vladimir-Suzdal) and then Moscow.

  • Kiev was never called "Oukraina" in the chronicles. The old Russian word "Oukraina" in the Primary Chronicle is only mentioned 2 times and refers ONLY to Pereyaslav BORDERLAND and in another instance to Galich Borderland - look at the map of Rus in the 12 c - they were the Borderlands.

    In later chronicles and documents there are dozens of "ukraina"s (Russian for "borderlands,periphery, outskirts" ) all over Rus and Russia - even in Siberia and Far North Murmansk Region (Ukraina Tersky).

  • Polish King Stefan Batory referred in 1580 "universal" to Russian Ukrajna, Kiev Ukrajna, Volyn Ukrajna, Podolye Ukrajna, Bracław Ukrajna - many different "ukrajna"s - borderlands of Polish-Lithuanian Kingdom.

  • There has never been a Ukrainian State until 1991 when Yeltsin and 2 other communists from Ukraine and Belarus divided USSR built on the territories of Russian Empire - certainly NO Ancient Ukrainian State ruled by Russian Rurik Dynasty Princes. There was Oukraina (and not just one) as a BORDERLAND of Rus, and then Ukrajna as provinces of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. 

  • Look at the map of Poland with the borders of 1648. In Wikipedia: "Polen in den Grenzen vor 1660" with the words Ukraine (hard to find) and also separately Kozaken somewhere under LITTAUEN and KLEINE POLEN (in big letters).

  • The first topographic fixation of "Ukraine" was published in 1650 in Rouen Book "Description d'Ukraine", written by a military engineer and cartographer Guillaume Levasseur de Boplan, who was invited by King Sigismund III in the 30's and 40's of the XVII century and served as an officer in the Polish army, and on behalf of King Wladyslaw IV and the Crown Hetman Konetspolski made a detailed map of the border lands of the Rcecz Pospolita Commonwealth (Poland)

  • There simply was no such word "Ukrainians" until second half of 19th century...Otherwise give me an example.Through centuries Ukraine had only geographical meaning of the border territories of Russia and Poland. 

  • The territory that departed from the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth to Russia after signing the peace treaty in 1667 - militant cossack semi-autonomy under the name "Hetmanate" was a small fraction of todays Ukraine territory which became what it is under Soviet Union as UkrSSR. The remainder lands even after the 1667 treaty continued to be parts of Poland or Turkey or were Russian historic lands long before this event. The Poles lost Kiev to Russia (originally Russian land until 14c).

  • As for the Chernigov, Russia just took back from the Poles what Poland had taked from Russia several decades before, in the course of the famous "Troubles". Chernigov region back in 1503, was part of the Russian state. The very old Russian city of Chernigov was built by Tsar Ivan the 3. And only in the early 17c during the Moscow campaign undertaken by the Poles in 1612 became part of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth

  • The quasi "Ukrainian" state of Hetmanate, which lasted until 18 th c did not arise BEFORE accession to Russia, but AFTER. It is when becoming part of Russia Cossacks (ie essentially the Black Sea steppes pirates of all kinds) actually received the status of the All-Russian elite, which they could not possibly get from Poland, who with fire and sword tried to restore order in this region.

  • "This great emperor, King Cristian, had mercy on our unbearable bitterness over the Orthodox Church in our Little Rosia, six years of our prayers prayers not despise,

    now graciously his royal heart to us bowed, his great fellow men to us with his royal highness was pleased to send, if with zeal the royal high hand will not love - will not find the peaceful haven. And who would disagree with us now, where ever he wants - let go."

  • Zaporozhian Cossacks never called themselves "Ukrainians". The first to call themselves "Ukrainians" were Polish aristocrats in Kiev (they spoke Polish too). They also were the first to start developing the concept of Ukrainian ethnic identity separate from All-Russian culture and history. Poland had many wars with Russia through history. Hence the Polish word "Moskal" (Muscovite) instead of Russian and calling Russia "Muscowy". Then this concept of Ukrainian Nationality was fostered by Austrian

  • Empire. Already in 1848 the governor of Galicia, Count Stadion proposed that calling Rusyn population of Galicia "Russian" was dangerous for national unity of the Austrian Empire, after which the authorities officially started calling them "ruthenians» (Ruthenen). He addressed the Rusyn deputies:

    "You can count on the support of government if you want to be an independent nation and reject national unity with the people in Russia, i.e., if you want to be ruthenium, not Russian.

  • The following split among Galician Rusyns resulted in extermination of Rusophile population (including in the first concentration camps in Europe and the World 1914-1917 - TALERHOF and TEREZIN - look up in Wikipedia). Only a book or a postcard in Cyrillic were grounds for arrest. Austrian Government paid 300 crowns for each "Russian Spy" turned in. Thousands of people were exterminated in the concentration camps. That was indeed a genocide!

    Here's a movie on YouTube: /watch?v=n70tN0maJhQ

  • If Stalin and Bolsheviks wanted to eradicate "Ukrainian nation" why were tons of food from the State Reserve sent to Ukraine in 1934? (That is when hunger was still all over the country)?

    Or why did Stalin give Ukraine parts of Poland and Romania and a permanent seat in the UN after the war?

    Or why chairman Khruschev gave Russian Crimea to Ukraine in 1954? Or why ukrainian Brezhnev ruled USSR for 18 years?

  • Lastly, "Communist Russian Regime" (where Ukrainians were among the ruling elite) does not exist already 20 years! Are you some kind of "Cold War Veteran"?

  • @DrMundo74 As for so called *White Rus*-it is but another region of Russia that drifted away from the rest of the land due to a lasting foreign yoke during the medieval era,also the word *white* in it has nothing to do with appearance or eye colour,it marks a geographic location(like Black Rus,Red Rus etc)  It is amazing how they intentionaly misinterpret history and base their assessments on deliberate distortion of facts..isnt it?:))

  • @LeninKGB As far as the culture of the people "the parts" have never been too far apart. No matter what twisted games the politicians and big business play. Wish there was less politics on YouTube. Enough turbulence in this world. Perhaps it's better not to answer these trolls even though sometimes it's hard to just pass by some hysterical BS. Eventually they'll become a nuisance and will die out. Peace))

  • @DrMundo74 NOW you use the term Rus!!! Was Rus' not our common heritage from whence we diverged into different ethnic groups with our own languages and cultures? Why are you so adamant to claim it all as "Russian" history. You can't quite seem to make your mind up, can you...

  • @irynski

    Rus is not a “term”. It is the name of the Ancient Russian State. "Руская земля" .

    "Ruskaya Zemlya" = Russian Land. Paste ' Руская земля' in Google Translate if you don't trust me. Also look up the etymology of "Rus" and "Russia" in Wikipedia. I am sorry it was not called "Ukr" or "Ukrainska Zemlya"...

  • I understand your frustration but the rulers of Rus - Russian Princes and Tzars of Rurik Dynasty were Russian not “Ukrainians”. Oleg the Prophet came to rule Kiev in 882 AD and declared it to be "The mother of Russian Cities".

    In the Primary Chronicle:

    Въ лѣто 6390 … [и] сѣде Ѡлегъ кнѧжа въ Києвѣ . и реч Ѡлегъ се буди мт҃и градомъ рускими

    "And sat Oleg to rule in Kiev, and said Oleg let it be the mother of russian cities"

    So was the Russian State found

  • @DrMundo74 Read wiki/Rus_(name), paying particular attention to > From Rus to Russia & > From Rus to Ukraine.

  • @DrMundo74 You claim you have no agenda! Your agenda is clear: you want to prove that an entire people did not exist. Ukrainians are some sort of quasi-Nation? You've stated the case at hand, being that of accession on behalf of your "Russian" state and that of the "Polish" state. Accession, in itself, tells you that oppressive methods/occupation by 'fire and sword' on behalf of BOTH Russians and Poles was used. Status? As what? Subjugated subjects of the Russian Empire.

  • @DrMundo74 One map from an Austro-Polish source? Are you kidding? There are thousands of maps from many, many sources. Take a look at the map wiki/Little_Russia and read the article!

  • @irynski LOL Looked at the map...finally found the word "Ukrain" (!!!) - right from Lemberg (pol.Lwow), under Volhinia (Volhynia) and Czernihow (Chernigov), above Braklaw (pol.Bracław) clearly Borderlands of Poland and Russia, WITHIN the borders of Poland and Russia of 1747 and not a state...

    

  • @DrMundo74 Haha! As noted, there are thousands of maps around. TO QUOTE YOU regarding sourcing more: "There are plenty of "sources" - Google, Wikipedia, Historical documents, Ancient Russian Chronicles...I don't know...Common sense also helps a lot..." You refuse to see that there is any material outside of the point you want to prove. That indicates nothing in the way of common sense, just tunnel vision.

  • @DrMundo74 Yes, of course. Everyone packed their bags, got on a plane and moved to Vladimir-Suzdal. They thought about it for a little bit and decided they'd like to live in Moscow instead. Simple explanations for simple minds.

  • @DrMundo74 Wrong information. Please provide your source.

  • @irynski I don't know what "source" you talking about...There are plenty of "sources" - Google, Wikipedia, Historical documents, Ancient Russian Chronicles...I don't know...Common sense also helps a lot...

  • @DrMundo74 Oh, you mean translation of works written by Serge A. Zenkovsky in the 1930's! The same Serge Zenkovsky whose aristocratic family (only some of whom were actually Ukrainian but changed their names from Ukrainian 'ko' endings to Russian 'ov' endings) had lived in Kyiv for generations but spoke ONLY Russian. This Russian wannabe moved to the US and was an editor of 'The Russian Review' from 1959. Yes, I can see how I should take his historical interpretations seriously.

  • Comment removed

  • @DrMundo74 The Primary Russian Chronicle was written by a monk whose name was Nestor around 1113...

  • @DrMundo74 The name, in itself, is duplicitous in its translation into English. Primary Russian Chronicle when Russia, even by your standards, did not exist? It is The Primary Chronicle of Rus' if it is to be translated properly on the most fundamental level.

  • @DrMundo74 For anyone interested in how reliable an historical chronicler Zenkovsky is, take a look at his obituary @

    jstorDOTorg/pss/130246

    <