Orchestra Nationala de Radio - Imnul Regatului Romaniei

[adelastefanov]

Traiasca Majestatea Sa Regele Mihai!

[botarolland]

uou, capatul imnului zici ca-i de la cv film in care a avut loc o victorie.

[bogdan19ify]

Glory St. Marshal Ion Antonescu

[cipicipicipicipicipi]

@bogdan19ify Prea mult nationalism strica

[basileush]

soy español, más VIVA EL REY, TRAISCA REGELE DA ROMANIA

[MultiLungu]

@basileush Spain and Romania sister latin country forever :-bd

[xapatan38]

NIHIL SINE DEO

[raymondbellami]

Sa ne traiasca REGELE ! 90 de ani !! :x

[bluepaintonyourface]

TRAIASCA REGELE! ESTE SINGURA NOASTRA SALVARE DUPA DUMNEZEU!

[bogdan19ify]

@bluepaintonyourface Noi ne pisam pe Rege daca te referi la curva care l-a vandtut pe Sfantul Maresal Antonescu

[gujifrik]

Nimic fără Dumnezeu!!!

[SerpeleRosu]

MONARHIA SALVEAZA ROMANIA!!!

[iuiu76]

Traiasca Regele Mihai!!!

[mugurveliscu]

Nihil sine Deo

[LiviuFloreaRo]

Astazi, 10 mai, Ziua Regatului, Traiasca Regele!

[victoroppenheim]

TRAIASCA REGELE!

[denidenichan]

Long live His Highness, King Michael of Romania!!!! I wish Romania was a kingdom now, not a republic....

[floareacrinului]

@denidenichan

In the hearts of lots of romanians It is a Kingdom, still, for as long as we are,...!!!!!!!!!!

[Gayalert69]

@denidenichan

In strictly legal terms Romania is still a monarchy. The abdication was unlawful

[sorinduta1989]

@Gayalert69 my friend who told you that in romania is still monarhy in legal terms? you dont even know the Constitution from 1923 (art. 79) and the first Constitution from 1866 (art 82): In case of vacancy of the throne, both Assembly shall meet as soon into a single meeting, even without a call, and no later than eight days from their meetings in choosing a sovereign King from a dynasty in Western Europe

[sorinduta1989]

@Gayalert69 my friend who told you that in romania is still monarhy in legal terms? you dont even know the Constitution from 1923 (art. 79) and the first Constitution from 1866 (art 82): In case of vacancy of the throne, both Assembly shall meet as soon into a single meeting, even without a call, and no later than eight days from their meetings in choosing a sovereign King from a dynasty in Western Europe

[breizhcatalonia1993]

@sorinduta1989 But Romania is in Western europe :P

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@breizhcatalonia1993 Depends how you look at things, Romania it'a very complicated country !

For instance geographically we're most of a Central european country, but we have 5% of the territory in the Balkan peninsula. Also politically during the communist era we were considered part of Eastern Europe.

Linguistically we are part of Western Europe, because we speak a Latin-Romance language, just like you guys in Catalonia ! Religiously, we're Christian-Orthodox, belonging to the Byzatine world.

[breizhcatalonia1993]

@SangeAlbastru1558 Yeah but in Spain people uses to say always, oh yes, Romania, in the Balkans.

Yeah i know in fact i consider more you a little eastern european but your language is "western". Nice to know that someone knows about catalan language :D

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@breizhcatalonia1993 Well as romanians we are very intrigued by the fact that catalan is the second romance language after italian that we share a high similarity of words ! If i would have to make a clasification, i would say italian is the first langauge we share a great similarity, than catalan, than portuguese !

Let me give you just a few examples: Fire: (ro) foc, (cat) foc / Rain: (ro) ploaie, (cat) pluja / Man: (ro) om, (cat) home ... and many more :D

[breizhcatalonia1993]

@SangeAlbastru1558 yeah :D i like Romanian language, and the thing is that it mixes romance language with quite slavic pronuncation, and other similar word too: fos in catalan son (they are) in catalan and sunt in romanian este(that) in catalan from valencia and este too in romanian.

PD: Are you monarchist?

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@breizhcatalonia1993 No, i think the monarchy is outdated ! It should only belong to the past, it has no future !

[breizhcatalonia1993]

@SangeAlbastru1558 then why you upload that? :S

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@breizhcatalonia1993 Because it's part of our history as a people, it's part of who we were and who we !

Everything that was in the past i belive it should be respected with it's up's and it's down's :)

The fact that i'm not a monarchist doesn't really mean that i don't respect our monarchic past !

But i simply belive that today in the 21 century to have kings and queens and all other titles, seems old fashioned. And it's not fair to classify people in "aristocrats" and "ordinary people" !

[breizhcatalonia1993]

@SangeAlbastru1558 Does the UK is an undemocratic or old fashioned country? could you give any arguments against the monarchy ;)

[alex4ucj]

@breizhcatalonia1993 He doesn't have any arguments. most republicans from Romania can't really have a real decent argument why the republic system is better than constitutional monarchy because nothing worked in Romania in republican-communism system or in presidential republican system. "Seems old fashioned" lol.. The monarchic countries of Europe are more developed than the republic ones. French for instance needed 5 republics to get somewhere.

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@alex4ucj Britanicii, spaniolii, etc vor sa treaca de la monarhie la republica, considerand casele lor regale drept niste paraziti care traiesc pe spinarea contribuabilului !

Monarhia pentru noi este de frumoasa amintire si ar fi bine sa ramana asa, pentru odata reintrata in scena politica va fi tavalita in noroi !

In plus argumente pro-republica sunt mult mai multe de cate am putut da eu pana acum. Crezi ca o republica precum SUA e nimic ?!

[alex4ucj]

@SangeAlbastru1558 Nu nu stiu ce sa zic, sistemul de azi e lamentabil, un monarh e dedicat statului, in schimb un presedinte republican se ocupa mai mult de bunastarea partidului lui, un presedinte in mod constitutional ar trebui sa fie echidistant si un garant al mersului institutilor, nu unul care sa abuzeze de ele. Noi ar trebui sa alegem doar prim-ministrul si partidele in Parlament, stabilitatea trebuie data de o Casa Regala care nu are interese si nimic de pierdut.

[alex4ucj]

@SangeAlbastru1558 Mie canadienii imi plac mai mult,fiind sub monarhie britanica, au un sistem social mult mai dezvoltat, si o economie aproape cat Statele Unite (fara a fi nevoiti sa porneasca razboaie prin alte tari pentru resurse). Si sistemul republican din SUA e diferit, practic presedintele acolo conduce si la nivel federativ (fiind practic un fel de prim-ministru). La noi in schimb presedintia ar trebui sa fie o institutie mai mult simbolica, sa asigure stabilitate.

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@alex4ucj pana la urma nu conteaza tipul de guvernare fie ca este semi-prezidential, prezidential sau parlamentar, ceea ce conteaza intradevar sunt oamenii care ajung in aceste pozitii cheie de conducere a aparatului statal !

Expresii gen "monarhia salveaza Romania" sunt vorbe in vant, pentru ca monarhia nu va putea face absolut nimic, pentru ca toate atributele puterii vor ramane tot in mana acelorasi oameni care ne guverneaza din 89 incoace.

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@alex4ucj Deci nu trebuie neaparat schimbata republica cu monarhia, cat trebuie schimbata acesta "dinastie" de fosti securisti care conduce Romania de mai bine de 20 de ani !

Daca reusim acest lucru vom fi o tara prospera si puternica, chiar si ramanand o "simpla" republica !

Sper ca am fost suficient de explicit.

[alex4ucj]

@SangeAlbastru1558 Stiu ca nu trebuie neaparat, insa fi sigur ca in viata ta nu vom scapa de acei "securisti". Noi ne-am modernizat cel mai rapid sub monarhie (vezi reformele de sub Coroana, vezi Romania Mare, vezi centrele istorice infrastructura construite (podul de la Cernavoda a fost construit pe vremea lui Carol si inca rezista) pana in 1947, vezi bumul economic de la sfarsitul anilor '30, vezi politica si respectul care-l aveam pe plan extern.

[alex4ucj]

@SangeAlbastru1558 "Paraziti care stau pe banii contribuabililor" e o propaganda spusa constant de grupuri de interese, mereu societatea va fi condusa de un grup, insa monarhia arata transparenta si e numai si numai in interesul Regatului. Actuala Casa Regala a Romaniei n-ar consuma nici 1-3% din cat fura actuala clasa politica si actualii republicani, si pe langa faptul ca s-ar face o economie de bani, s-ar asigura si o stabilitate mai buna a institutilor publice.

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@alex4ucj Sunt de acord cu tine, ai niste argumente destul de bune !

Dar revenirea fostului monarh pe tronul tarii nu mi-se pare potrivita, pentru ca a abdicat intr-un moment dificil. Apoi nu are succesori masculini cum cere legea salica din monarhia romana !

Sunt pro aducerea unui print strain si formarea unei noi dinastii.

Hohenzollernii vor ramane legati de Romania asa cum sunt legati si alde Sturza, Ghika, Caradja, etc !

[alex4ucj]

@SangeAlbastru1558 Legea salica nu mai este in vigoare, nu mai suntem in 1923 traim in secolul 21, secol in care femeile si barbatii au acelesi drepturi, succesiunea regala in Romania se va face dupa model britanic, urmatorul succesor in cazul in care Romania isi restabileste forma de conducere pierduta cu forta 1947 din cauza comunistilor si pierduta si in 1990 dincauza gastilor post-comuniste, va fi A.S. Principesa Margareta, vom avea Regina.

[SangeAlbastru1558]

@alex4ucj Inteleg !

Totusi raman la convingerea ca Mihai a patat imaginea Casei Regale si pentru descendentii sai. Dar nu atat de mult incat sa pateze imaginea monarhiei precum alternativa la conducerea actuala.

In orice caz ar trebui adus altcineva pe tronul celui de-al " Doilea Regat al Romaniei" :)

Citisem odata de Charles al Marii Britanii si nu cred ca este o ideea rea ! Este extrem de cunoscut, deci imagineaza-ti boom-ul turistic dupa incoronare !

[Gayalert69]

@SangeAlbastru1558

I'm sorry, but this is a really crass response to constitutional monarchy. Why don't you consider why it thrives in some of the most politically, socially, and economically sophisticated countries in the world? I'd rather be a citizen of "old fashioned" Denmark then a citizen of 21st century Romania's fifth rate republic. Monarchy built Romania - monarchy will save it if people like you open your eyes and ears.

[sorinduta1989]

@Gayalert69 my friend who told you that in romania is still monarhy in legal terms? you dont even know the Constitution from 1923 (art. 79) and the first Constitution from 1866 (art 82): In case of vacancy of the throne, both Assembly shall meet as soon into a single meeting, even without a call, and no later than eight days from their meetings in choosing a sovereign King from a dynasty in Western Europe

[titipersonal]

sunt de acord, daca in romania era acum o monarhie constitutionala eram pe unul din locurile fruntase ale europei...

si da, traiasca regele!

[iliesko]

in niciun caz...romania e republica si asa va ramane....

[alex4ucj]

@iliesko Decat Iliescu-Basescu, eu aleg M.S. Mihai I si A.S. Principesa Margareta.

[lillybellebutterfly1]

E mult mai frumos imnul asta decat actualul.

[stanesti]

@lillybellebutterfly1 Cel mai frumos imn pentru tara noastra! Traiasca Regele in pace si onor!!

[vladknz07]

@lillybellebutterfly1 Ai mare dreptate !

[Contessamy]

Traiasca Regele ! Romania ar fi avut o pozitie mult mai buna daca inca era regat