Added: 3 years ago
From: Abandoneware
Views: 303,254
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (487)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Red alert 2 + generals = red alert 3

  • only thing the japanese are missing are: power rangers ( or are they inside that giant robot?)

  • Why did they have to nerf the Apacalips tanks? that was my ace unit!

  • one not logical thing.. why do the allies still have the chronosphere when einstein is dead?

  • Is this Japanese force ? Very cool lol

  • RA2 Intro & RA1 > RA3

  • Ryan, you'll find your answer here in the RA1 intro.

  • if he went back to kill Einstein, who went back to kill Hitler?

  • best cinematic ever

  • @DrBlackworth problem with China being the third superpower is that they resemble the Soviets too much. EA was going more for diversity with the factions rather than historical fact.

  • crap crap crap

  • looks like japan has been overpowered meaning imbalanced

  • shjt,if i have this game,i will kill all the japanese,because that just look like london and my grandparents are live there,FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Ra3 good? LOL its a SUCKY SHIT ! even Ra2 was WAAAAAY better! Maybe even 1 ...fuck it !

  • Someone just please shoot PsionicAnnihilator and he may shall be granted a Nobel Peace Prize award.

  • Странно што THQ её не выпускают ,это по части THQ)

  • @sgthobbes2 Oh yeah, like how all the other Red Alerts were realistic.

  • @Dylemus Actually, the whole Red Alert franchise are unrealistic. Well, im talking about the machineries thing. Everything is just a mocking of the Cold War. An insult to scientists who spend their whole life in creating more weapons because they are traumatized.

  • @Dylemus he has point though a better candidate for a third superpower would be China

  • EA fucked up RA so bad. It's supposed to be about the US and the Soviet Union duking it out, not some weird ass, unrealistic Jap shit rice machines. Ruined the game for me.

  • @sgthobbes2 you are more shit than japan

  • どうしてこうなったwwww

    

  • EA messed this game up so bad.

    The one thing that did it for me was the odd cartoonish graphics and physics. I love the wacky universe with odd machines of war, but they've always looked real in some way. not like in RA3 where russian tanks has their turrets shaking and bumping while they drive.

    That's just ontop of the game itself beeing really, really boring and plain.

  • @HuloHaj Indeed, just boring. I totally agree - played 1 week and it was boring.

  • guy walking his dog: omg i drink too many vodka

  • Red alert 3, not bad because of the creators, but the publsihers, FUCK EA. they fucked up Westwood, and they fucked up Maxis, what is next?

  • ye i agree fuk RA3 and fuk ea red alert 2 is the shit, classical game man ffs

  • wow... Never new this game got so much hate. Well if any of u guys hate it so much why not just go fucking make a game that you like yourselves...dick.

  • god i just love the red alert series intros

  • oh shi! Kaela Mensha Khaine 1:02

  • 1:00

    When Red Alert jumped the shark...

  • Thanks for ruining the series EA you fucking idiots.

  • my main complaint about RA3 was how slow it felt. Also every faction had "op" tanya's

  • this game has just won a new award: fake beyond believe

  • @smaltalkfan the trailer looks good though

  • the chinese starwars

  • the guy at the start must be scared shitless

  • ALERTE ROUGE!

    SACRE BLEU!

  • always the japanese with giant robot soldiers

  • Great Cinematic!

    Period.

  • @smaltalkfan its the community thats more fucked up.

  • I still get chills whenever I hear this song...

  • perso, je préfère hell march 2.

  • 1:00 someone call power rangers haha =D

  • i just wish they would remake red alert 1 call it red alert redemption or some shit and just make the same game with better physics and graphics with all the stuff you wish red alert 1 had along with it

  • I hope this game has so many uses for infantry.

  • lol 0:44-0:47 second dude on the left is like "wtf am i supposed to do??"

  • EA ruined the Game... :(

  • @malfunctionm1ke

    *whispers* no, the opposite of what you just said.

  • @malfunctionm1ke

    Indeed. They ruined all C&C. RA3 was first, and C&C4 after. Epic fail. Bustards.

  • @Pravover

    Wow, you haven't played those games, well I gottta say CnC4 sucked because it just didn't had the cnc taste, but if you are saying that CnC 3 and RA3 sucked then you are moron who havven't played it long enough to realize what the game is about, and they are both made by EALA.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator

    ??? I started to play C&C from very first game about 1.5 decade ago..Including "Dune" (both). RA and RA2 was greatest. C&C3 was good anough, but RA3 was a fail comparing to RA2. C&C4 was a epic fail.

  • @Pravover

    Tell me what made RA and RA2 the greatest?

    If we are talking about the story then yes RA1 and RA2 has a great story but if we are talking about the competitive gameplay to be comparable to SC then RA3 has the best gameplay.

    Just try and play online thats where it shines, old fans expect everything to be in the campaign, they think a game with great singleplayer means its a great game.

    People love SC cuz it has fun multiplayer, but cnc fans are just different, they don't look at MP.

  • is th is game worth me getting and wasting away my precious time i have on?

  • Loved the tanks, especially the helicopters; but the giant robot is overkill.

  • at 0:46 it looks like a Russian Star Wars Game

  • Hey RA3!! Fuck your model!!

  • @maserline2124

    It's Red Alert and its fucking Japan inspired by japanese anime. The game is stereotypical, have ever even played the previous games? If you did then how come you know nothing about it?

  • It think it's better...  : SWORD OF JUSTICE RTS

  • You guys are not used to the new Gaming style Ra3 is a great game.

    If you don't like it well its your loss really.

    One thing that pisses me off is that how you guys write comments that has false meanings about the game.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator I liked all Ra1, Ra2 and CnC generals but Ra3 changed too much. it got to "futuristic and it just makes it a little fake. I mean I'm sure its fun and all if you're into it. if have you played Ra1, Ra2 or Generals before playing Ra3 you'll know what I mean.

  • @Zenthos01

    It is worldwar 3, so using high tech futuristic weaponry is not "unusual", and the Japan now have advanced the nano tech, they have robot like hightech walkers.

    In a wacky game called Red Alert, who wouldn't expect the japan to not have Robots infuluenced by their anime.

    It would be lame if they had just normal tanks, normal plain looking buuildings/units, I mean they are japan and its world war 3.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator I know not unusual. its just that its pretty unrealistic even for a futuristic game. like really fun fake. robots. and Why would it be lame if it had normal looking tanks. that would just be more realistic. the weird tanks and robots are sort of like little children toys. it just has that feel to it. everything seems so flimsy and fake. like the sound effects for the tanks shooting and the guns. that's the main thing that bothered me.

  • @Zenthos01

    God, do you even know what Red alert is? Its suppose to be unrealistic and wacky, Dude, the first Red Alert had Tanya, giant ants, double barreled tanks, double barreled tanks THE SIZE OF HOUSES, Tesla coils, time travel, ore growing out of the surface of the earth, teleporting tanks, earthquake tanks that exploded themselves, truck-based nuke delivery systems, and trucks that generated rents in space and time to hide behind.

    and you think the sound fx are lame?OMG u havent played it

  • @PsionicAnnihilator I know what Ra is. I played all of them. lol. part 2 and yuris revenge are not unrealistic. even though some of the things don't exist the system seemed realistic. even with the mind control things and the double barreled tanks. and I don't remember earthquake tanks or teleporting tanks. its just part 3, there are some good stuff. I mean they could have made it better. and also the sound fx are toy like. you don't notice until you actually see a game with less puny sounds

  • @Zenthos01

    Wow really? Scaling is horrible, and the teleporting tank is Chrono Tank and there is M.A.D which is a shockwave tank they were all in RA1. Now you you are going like its realistic ... right.

    Somehow I feel RA3 is realistic, more logically realistic, how units work, the concept art if you look deep into it they are awesome, and the gameplay, faction diversties and all that very well made.

    You are worried about sound fx? omg tell me what sound fx is exactly bothering you. Geez...

  • @Zenthos01 so dude, when its ww3, you are going to use a normal tank while i use a fucking giant laser robot? hmm....

  • @Claziranon LOL! the only reason they put laser robots in this game is because they went in a TIME MACHINE! and made Einstein disappear from history. he was the discoverer of nuclear energy so without him any weapon that uses nuclear energy ceases to exist and that's the twist. and that's the only reason for the giant, useless, clumsy robots. even with high technology I doubt they'll ever do something as dumb as that.

  • @Zenthos01

    Dude, you need to open up your History books.

    because there were no einstein, Japan was not halted during WW2, NO nukes were dropped on Japan making them advance in further. Japan actually was working on Nano tech way back in 1950s

    and its WW3! its in the future where the japanese have super nano tech, and has robotic units influenced by their anime/media.

    Seriously what did you expect from the japan in a stereotypical wacky universe? let me guess normal fucking tanks in ww3?

  • @PsionicAnnihilator U right! am japanese...In Japan we citizens sometimes see weird things like UFOs and and all... these things are way different from what is normally considered to be ufos..ex like landing behind hills or dissapearing upon a lake or an entire family dissappearing after one of them hacked the military intranet!

  • @PsionicAnnihilator Not that it has to do anything with your point, but Japan wasn't halted because of the nukes, practically they were defeated before the nukes, the navy and the air force were both destroyed and the reason USA nuked Japan was that it was cheaper then a full-scale invasion D-Day style. (and to scare the russians)

  • @SigurdDaMan true, they were finished, i believe Nagasaki and Hiroshima were "LIVE tests" for the new bomb, its sickening what they did. the excuse was they will never give up a landed invasion would be disasterous. they were flying planes into ships does that not reek of desperation? defeat? no? well lets drop nuclear bombs on civilian cities yay capitilism

  • @kwazhimself Speaking of that subject, you also has to mention the Japanese war crimes in East Asia, for example ''The rape of Nanking''. The japanese slaughtered chinese civilians like they were animals, and about 20 000 women were raped. Just sayin' to not make Japan look like the good guys since there are no good guys in war.

  • @kwazhimself

    Think of it:

    166,000 dead compared to 5 million.

    no nukes - USSR Invasion of Europe and possibly USA.

    So I think Nukes were better.

    and tbh...Japan did quite a lot of sickening stuff. They deserved it. the Populace knew fully well who they were backing, cold murderous bastards. If you've ever seen what they've done to the Chinese...you'll puke at how sick they were.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator when was einstein taken away exactly?

    RA1, einstein removes hitler from the play before WW2(in other words, no nukes were dropped on Japan because there was no axis allience)

    RA3, einstein is removed(this would mean, no chronosphere, no nukes, hitler reappears, WW2 happens like it should and after Hitler is defeated, the allied+comintern still have a common enemy in japan and beat it first. it'd be amazingly random to start battling eachother and leave japan alone, no?)

  • @Rhonion HE was removed after HItler was removed. Somewhere during the aftermath of RA1 I believe.

    Well yea, timeline is such a paradox and goofy, there can never be a proper explanation to it.

    So yea, that means everything had to change, and plus its whole different universe.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator at least the first and second were semi-realistic..

    the third one is so abstract you'd start to wonder if they actually cared about how they brought it.. seems to me like they just thought "hey! let's add a third faction!" and then just used a time-travel and a half-baked story to justify it..

  • @Rhonion

    That is, if you want to think of it like that.

    I like the 3rd one actually, its quite unexpected and interesting and makes you wonder.

    But seriously, its a game where einstein creates a timemachine and teleporting device and kills hitler. It isn't so "odd" to have Einsein removed in the 3rd one.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator wthout those nukes WW2 would still exist and Japan would still be beaten by americans or USSR just after Germany. Those nuclear bombs destroyed only 2 cities and USSR would've just take over Japan.

  • @Claziranon and comment number 2. the tanks "normal" tanks in ww3 would probably be so advanced they'd probably be able to take it. you see even in world war 3. there's not gonna be any dumb clumsy robots. or any other make belief crap that's just great for fantasy stories but when it comes down to tactical Strategy its not really gonna work out. I do believe though that they'll have things such as lighting fast, invisible aircraft, tanks with force fields(is possible today) laser weaponry.

  • @Claziranon A giant walking robot, although great at crossing terrain, would be far too vulnerable for practical use in combat; one shot to the legs would effectively cripple it, taking it out of the battle. The currently used belt tank may have problems in certain terrain, but it's much harder to disable. A possible advancement would be "spider tanks", moving on 6-8 short legs, however this would require much more computing power to make sure the legs don't get all tangled up.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator We were just not used to EA screwing up so many legendary game series, but now we are used to it.

  • @panarkas

    They didn't screw up, and you guys are really silly, Developers, and Publishers they are different things.

    As for RA3, EA was the publisher and EA LA was the developer, Westwood employees were still there and made RA3, and CnC3 after their company was bought.

    Westwood itself agreed, they made decition, its not EAs fault for buy their company ,EA asked and Westwood said yes.

    Westwood was eating EA's money back in 2000, cancelled many games and made dissappointing fail games.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator this indeed. yeah I played the first Ra1 (not the 2nd though :P)

    and I must say, I like this game alot. Not as much as Ra1, but still its good.

  • So I was like: Wait, if this is japan, where the hell are the gundams? Then I got to 1:00. Good to know some things never change, even in time-travelling timeline screwups.

  • THIS GAME IS THE BEST THUMBS UP FOR RA 3 !!!

  • If this game had a different name every1 would ve said is was an awesome rts game. But now only because they called it C&C red alert 3 ppl are complaining. xD

  • Game, y u no like this

  • Yes Ra1 and 2 kicks ass and some people might find them better than Ra3, but then you have to consider the new nation, graphics and the music.. I have all three games and have been playing them since they came out. I think Ra1 is slightly better but in the end they're pretty much equal.

  • 0:52 Raiden ?

  • rising sun = Japan >:D

  • long live empire of the rising sun!!!!

  • 1:00 Optimus Prime got Evil.

  • Alerte Rouge... I love it

  • needs to reinstall RA3, it was a fun the new additions put, basiclly it was like a enhancement of RA1/2, i mean don't get me wrong the classics were great but i like RA3..

  • crap... can anybody tell me the name of the song?

  • @castorpower666 Hell march 3

  • 0:16 the most horrible sign ever created ... i mean westwood would look a lot better !

  • even if this one isnt as good as RA1 or RA2 there still one thing that none can argue with...it has the best soundtrack

  • @Heiachmanma

    two things actually,

    1-Soundtrack

    2-Women xD

  • @MrFrattt87 and gameplay, balanced gameplay, water base building, each unit with special abilities, faction diversities, awesome shaders (expect the bloom), awesome water, interesting campaign, more skill requiring, no more spamming, more micro requiring.

  • @Heiachmanma

    this is the soundtrack of RA2 ^^

    called hell march

  • @TheTrifleXx i know its just pretty much remade every game

  • @Heiachmanma Frank Klepacki is legendary. His artistic talent will never be surpassed when it comes to video game music.

  • @akhero47 yes...yes indeed

  • I wish WESTWOOD IS ALIVE AGAIN!

    LIVE WESTWOODS LIVE FROM THE GETTING SHUTDOWN BY EA!

  • @MrRenzjericho Fun fact for you sir

    Petroglyph(Game developer that made universe at war and star wars empire at war) is primarily known for their experience in RTS game development as the company's founding members worked on Command & Conquer and Dune II.

    So yea :)

  • @MrRenzjericho Yeah that was the only way I was able to play Renegade online!!!!! GOD DAMMIT EA!!!!!!

    BUT they did create generals which introduced me to all of CNC so Im a little mixed on what to think about EA.

  • This game was great! Sadly it didn't have Red Alert feel to it :/ Maybe next one nails it :)

  • Alerte Rouge... crap, what a gay language....

  • USSR+War against allies=Total and epic win. USSR+war against allies+RA3 storyline=Epicest fail of RedAlert series.

  • @theheadhunter502 epicest isnt a word you fail at life

  • graphics make a game look less like a game

    but graphics dont make a game better

  • at 1:05 is  a Samurai????

  • @MsStatharas no es un ninja we

  • What's so bad about RA3? It looks amazing!

  • @onlypolar The bad thing is that RA2 was infinetely better in all aspects except graphics and I personally even prefer oldschool 2d instead of comic-junk 3d. :(

  • @AsyxA Ever since EA took over from Westwood Studios the CNC games in general turned to crap. They're still playable and somewhat enjoyable, but the newer ones are nowhere near as good as Westwood made the old ones. Argh... another good series falling prey to the traps of the industry. Louis Castle and Brett Sperry must have been pulling their hair out when they saw what EA did to their baby. And Joe Kucan... he did the best he could, but it isn't his fault the script for CNC4 is terrible.

  • @AsyxA

    As an anime lover I love the RA3 style, it's insipired by japanese anime and media, the ninjas, the mechas and the kamikaze units.

    The gameplay is way better, it's not all bout spam spam spam and spam, it's way more advanced which I guess it's why you guys hate the gameplay. but to me the more complex (the more fun)

    Still who knows if westwood made ra3 it could have been a complete crap, because before they were shut down by EA they were making fail games that never made any sales.

  • @onlypolar

    Don't listen to them they are just confused in between their own opinion and others convinces.

  • Get some apocalypse tank out, dumbasses

  • the rising sun would be destroyed even if the two nukes where dropped

  • where yuri..

  • at 0.48 star wars?? jedi lol

  • 0:36 I thought it was BlackOut from Transformers.. O.O

  • Light Saber < Shot gun

  • Conscript reporting!

  • Giant robots? If I wanted to play Gundam Wing I would bloody play Gundam wing! Bring back Westwood and get rid of this Red alert 3 "The Phantom Menace".

  • @tberwick1

    What would you expect from japan? Obviously giant mechas, ninjas and kamikaze units inspired by Japanese animes.

    Back in Ra2 there were a guy who mindcontrolled structures and units (thats not even serious)... and a giant squids that would hump ships and flying saucer disks. Also a tank with a big brain inside that mind controlls 3 units.

    Ra2 seems a bit more silly than Ra3. As an anime lover myself, the concept the japan everything about the game is great.

  • @emotionalpunkboy

    Dont forget the Dolphins with Solar weapons. Ra3 went over the top, the only thing good about Ra3 was the cutscenes.

  • @tberwick1

    Ra2 had dolphins so does Ra3, and solar weapons? you mean sonar?

    See you have nothing else to say thats why you are saying only the cut scenes are good.

  • @emotionalpunkboy

    Ah, so I did say solar...my bad =) Though they were pretty amusing. Quite like the mechanical spider things that tore into tanks

    Didnt play Ra3 long enough to find out. Bloody transformers on water with the vehicles. Near enough everything can go into water. Got a bit sick of Ra3 as you might have guested. If you like it fine, a lot of people who played the previous two dont.

    The cutscenes are good, EA spent a fair bit of dosh on them. Though nothing trumps Westwood Studios

  • @tberwick1

    One big huge turn off to you guys is that, sea is now more important so is air which makes one more thing more important. Towers are nolonger OP so don't expect yourself to build bunch of tower to defend yourself. Units are important.

    I know lots of people who used to play ra2 and ra1 and now loves ra3. They are not in youtube though, only in online forums and other sites. Here you have bunch of ra2 EA hater fans.

  • @emotionalpunkboy

    I dont hate EA, just miss Westwood. Air was always fairly important, though you are right about the sea. Only on certain missions was the sea of any importance. Was a bugger on one of the missions in transporting all the units over. However in several missions the sea did play a crucial part. Think there was one in pearl harbour. Yeah, no more Tesla towers etc. Just the retro arcade style that I don't particular care for. Ra3 is not a bad game, but it does not compare to Ra1+2

  • @tberwick1

    In Ra2 it was mostly about tanks, allies had only 2 air units, soviets had only 1.

    In Ra3 theres many air units, and in order to win you must use all of them properly. If you spam bunch of tanks, they would be destroyed by Anti-Armour Choppers, so you need Anti air fighter.

    These makes the game more harder for players.

    There are Tesla Towers, Ra3 did not lose everything ra2 and ra1 had, it only didn't bring Yuri. There are mods being for Ra3 that will bring back Ra1 and RA2 in 3D

  • @tberwick1 Don't get convinced by other's fake comments. Play the game yourself, before making a choice.

    You'll only truly understand the game if you play it yourself, Ra3 is more like Ra2 mixed with modern RTS.

    So it's like SC + Ra2. Still it's not all about spamming.

    People nowadays think that every RTS is bad if it's not same as RA2 or SC which is a complete bullcrap.

  • @emotionalpunkboy

    I havent read any fake comments. I just played a few missions on Ra3 and got a bit sick of it. Well I actually preferred Ra1 over Ra2, for my childhood memories. Do they think that every RTS is bad if its not Ra2? I dont know, first ive heard of it. I mean Sudden Strike, Men of War they under that category right? Anyways, in short I was not impressed with Ra3 and what EA did with it. However, in fairness it would have been difficult to compete with Ra1 & Ra2.

  • @tberwick1

    Oh I see, you guys expect so much from Campaigns. Before back in the old days campaigns were great but now not every RTS has some addicting campaigns. and you don't even know many of the structures, and units.

    Play the multiplayer. Thats where it REALLY SHINES. It's just amazing.

    Ra2 could be famous for its skirmish and campaign but RA3 has some sick awesome Multiplayer.

    Don't expect few campaign missions to prove the whole game.

  • @emotionalpunkboy

    Well yes. I do expect something good from the campaigns. Nothing wrong with the storyline, I just wasnt interested in playing it any further. Sometimes a game isnt what you hoped it to be and you move on. Im not talking about every RTS. I could, but its not relevant. Sold it years ago. So I cannot comment on the multiplayer and I am not interested in it. Im sure it does shine well, they usually do. Ra2 is famous, but I prefer Ra1 for the lol times. We still talking about this?

  • would be nice if the man and the dog were the soviet supersoldier Volkov and his loyal friend, Chitzkoi :D

  • at least the music's good, .... kinda ..

  • 0:45 ITZ A LIGHT SABOR :O

  • has no-one else noticed that they assassinated questionably the greatest scientist of all time, and yet the technology is far superior to what they were fight when they lost?

  • the soviets must feel stink

  • I played alot of ra2 even yuri revenge and it pwns , yet i downloaded for 6 hours and i notice that i play all in high setting and the game for me is still very sucks compared to ra2 , ra2 rocks ! (:

  • in ra3 is an one big epic fail look : If was eInstein killed so ok no nuclear weapons and so on bu A. Einstein developt prism tower and allies have it isnt it strange?

  • @isaimon they don't have prism tower retards, only spectrum tower =_=

  • @8900609 It's the same thing with different color.

  • @Helge129

    Nope, not only color, but the damage output and how it reflects.

    PRISM reflects like magic, wether if its not a metal or a shiny object it would reflect like crazy.

  • @PsionicAnnihilator You can't compare the damage output between RA2 and RA3, they use completely different settings. Spectrum also reflects off of everything.

  • @Helge129

    Exactly, I am just saying that they are not exactly the same, the damage, the fx....tther refelection rate...

    Spectrum I believe deales 12% damage when it reflects while Prism gives 50%, and no matter how many it reflects prism always has the same fx. It should look more smaller, less visible and realistic.

  • why do you say that RA3 is an epic fail?

  • @runearnas

    because you have never played RA1 and 2

    

  • @humpingbird

    well i played RA2 a bit

  • no my blimp D:

  • LAsers vs Zeppelins...pwned lol

  • Tenno Hieka! Banzai!

  • The beginning of the intro is just like me sending my entire army after the last enemy soldier on the map. GET 'EM!!!

  • theres a point where we needed to stop, and we clearly passed it

  • why do soviets dont have nuclear weapons?

  • @LevaniaDaemon Because they went back in time to eliminate Einstein at the beginning of Red Alert 3.

  • @LevaniaDaemon Without Albert Einstein's E=MC2 equation, Nuclear weapons could not be created.

  • 0:48 jedai warrior

  • the Japanese built gundams....how surprising. 1:01

  • Looks like Star-Wars ..........

  • wtf is this?

  • kanker reclame

  • cette fois c'est pas les allemands mais les japonais!

  • RA2 had a mission where the bonus object was to take out the twin towers.

    RA3 Rising sun had a tank called the tsunami tank.

    I truly hope this tradition does not continue.

  • king oni can't attack air units

  • очень прикольно это смотреть в 17 марта 2011 года..... мои соболезнования людям Японии...

  • never understood why soviet music was playing while rising sun invaded

  • soviet warblip are the coolest!