if the elevator doesnt work and the aiplane is going up is because you havent put the TRIM right. use the elevator trim properly, then the plane will go straght, the guy flying here dont know how to fly it
@blackjerryboymetal 727's are way smaller than a 767 and a 747. So much smaller that there flight characteristics aren't comparable. I agree that he should have used a 767 model but it probably wasnt available with all the parameters that the 747 model includes. But 767 and 747's have a much closer flight envelope than either do with the 727.
I bet the man who supposedly flew flight 11 into the WTC would have no idea what to do with the 767's complex instrument panel! This along with never having flown a commercial 767 makes the idea of a successful no flyby impact astronomically miniscule!
Firstly, why the conflicting speed reports. Secondly, this is an odd test that didn't simulate that actual conditions. It was a 767 that hit the tower. And they nosed down from 26 thousand feet at a rate of 10 000 feet per minute. They could have reached some insane speed during that decline. I don't think they would carry that speed as they leveled out and hit the building tho.
@16hypen3sp 10,000 feet per minute? Could they have leveled out from such a steep dive? The throttles were wide open to maintain that high of an airspeed at impact. This kind of control of an aircraft from a guy who had never flown a Boeing 767? This feat alone defies all logic, yet on 9-11-01 THREE such feats happen, without a hitch!
A 767-200 hitting the twin towers is equivalent to shooting a bb gun at a freight train. Since 911 everyone is an expert on aerodynamics, aircraft and jp fuel etc.. Yet most do not even know the basic principle that creates lift for aircraft, let alone the differences between turbofan, turbojet. Now this statement will be attacked with so called "physics experts" LOL.
Aircraft deformation would begin as the aircraft hit the tower yet we didnt see that.
A question. What is the never exceed speed for a 767 at sea level. What do Boeing, who make the aircraft, claim the never exceed speed is for this aircraft at sea level?
@skyarcher Mach 0.50... That's simply a safety standard, it does NOT mean it's impossible to reach such speeds at sea level. Those planes are capable of traveling 500mph at 700 feet. Is it safe? Of course not. Possible? Certainly.
@ctcole77 what blew through 3 rings of the pentagon? and, made the same size hole through all 3 rings? Can an aluminum plane do that? What happened to the 'plane' that "hit the pentagon" and all it's contents? No chairs, no luggage, and how did they manage to find DNA samples of all but 2 of the socalled passengers on that plane? If everything but a few pieces 'disappeared', how could they find DNA?
@skyarcher I read somewhere that for a Boeing 767 the never exceed is mach 0.88 at high altitude and below 10000 ft it is somewhere between 420 and 440 kts, but the Master WARNING alarm for overspeed will begin to sound at 360 kts which is the Maximum operation speed below about FL270
@NowKillYourself this will happen with all jetliners of similar size, it is something called lift and the air density at sea level makes the aircraft nose up at higher speeds. A common aspect of most large wide bodied airliners.
@DemonDik Video evidence shows United Airlines flight 175 flying below 1,000 feet at 223 meters per second. It flew in a straight line, even with the dense air and high speeds.
@MrGeneralKenobi Here is a simple question for you Mr. know all to test your knowledge of aircraft. According to the manufacturer Boeing, what is the max speed of a 767(same as for 747) at ground level ?
@skyarcher Okay, Col. I know my shit. 747 and 767s have different flight dynamics , so it really doesnt matter. Just cause its "Boeing" doesn't mean at all that one aircraft is like another, since they are all different , in a special way.
@skyarcher No way!?!? I refused?! Thanks for stating the obvious?! Distract...? Really....? How old are you? What kind of a conversation revolves around 1 question for all of its duration? Btw I saw the your little question so there is no need to waste your energy typing it again or copying and pasting it , if you're that lazy.
@MrGeneralKenobi I ask you a question which you cannot answer for if you did answer it correctly would prove my point here and you would be exposed as the blathering idiot you actually are.
@skyarcher Max speed of a Boeing 747-400: Mach 0.92, 533 knots, 614mph at 35,000 feet. The 767-200's maximum cruise speed at 35k feet is 493 knots or 568mph. So, NO, the planes are NOT the same. You are not comparing apples to apples. You need to test fly a 767-200 with the EXACT fuel load, passenger/cargo load as well. Sure it's unsafe to fly at 500+ mph at 700 feet alt. [ALT. of #175 on impact; 9/11] but it's definitely NOT impossible.
@skyarcher If they answer your question that would defeat their purpose. Their purpose is not to answer questions, but to confuse the issue for as long as they can. They work for the government. The shadow government. The shadow government knows that it's plans to wipe out 90 percent of the population is not proceeding according to plan and that their time is almost up. The shadow government never bothered to inform the dis-information agents that their work is no longer needed.
Really a video Game? Just call boeing. And the high jackers had more than 6 hours. They achieved their CPL's. One actually applied for a job as a commercial pilot. But hey you are the expert playing your video games.
I asked my friend who flies a 767 this question. No problem!! Was his answer. Especially when the aircraft is coming out of a dive. Which it was. No load on the engines?
@blackjerryboymetal The only real evidence suggests that you have inherited (among other things) the same nervous twitch that the other government swallowing sycophants that park here have demonstrated so stop right there, you talking monkey…you shouldn’t be giving us truthers anything less than the best ass kissing performance you are capable of.
I'd just like to know how you think that thousands of people could have possibly seen something that wasn't really there. Did the government brainwash thousands of New Yorkers? Did they put CGI planes into their thoughts? Hurry, put a tinfoil hat on.
To answer the question from your description - I guess you're right. Planes didn't hit the towers, I no longer believe that... I guess the towers are still standing and 3000+ people are still alive enjoying time with their families...
In case you're too stupid to realize - that (above) is sarcasm. You, sir, are an idiot.
could you make it again with 767? cuz its aerodynamics are different, nice simulation though and i agree that the speed presented by the government is fake
The B727 has turbojets and the B767 has turbofans. Turbofans large front high bypass fan cannot handle the amount of air density at low altitude. The M.I.T, F.A.A, NIST and FEMA speeds are clearly ridiculous. Also, the videos showing 175 impacting the S. Tower all show no deceleration as it encounters the steel building. Try it yourself with any of these "impact" videos: F=ma=m(0)=0 force on building.
count the frames for the plane to fly nose to tail in air and again when the nose contacts.
There is only one dummy in this conversation mate )
You appear to know absolutely nothing about aircraft speeds and limitations at different altitudes? and you appear to have learnt nothing at all from this video regarding these matters which was the reason i posted it?
Having any further dialogue with you is like me talking to someone who believes the magic of Santa Claus is what enables powered flight?
set the trim stab.... holy crap. Yeah it may be over speeding, and the elevator may have ripped off, but seriously dude learn what trim stab is. Then take a course on True airspeed vs indicated airspeed. Theres a mad difference. You look silly, you can't even hold 1000 ft, and you keep pushing forward violently like a monkey. TRIM THE PLAN.
Is this trying ot prove the plane didn't hit the Pentagon because large identifiable pieces of it like the tail section with the logo were all over the front lawn. We were lied to about many things surrounding that day but that plane definetely went into the Pentagon.
Ummmmmmm, this is a 747 (note the engine readout on the center display panel - 4 engines). Flight 175 was a 767-222. As for the program - looks like MS Flight Simulator X.
One of the other guys was right - the plane needs to be re-trimmed as you gain speed - this is true in any aircraft (ok, not sure about the B2 bomber, etc). Otherwise, as you gain speed, the nose will invariably lift up. I'm guessing the author is about 15 years old (this is why he over-dubbed the computer voice).
@kkMonterey Goon. I mention in the very first minute that the aircraft is not a 767 but a 747. Both aircraft have nearly exactly the same V speeds. It is MS Fs2004 not X. wrong.
If i choose to make a video and write out the dialogue for it and use my computer to read that dialogue that is my choice. I have made videos. You have not. I have 165,000 video views. You have none. I know however 15 yr olds who make better and more intelligent points than you do.
ah.. '04, not X. wow, you're right! that proves everything. this video sucks and proves nothing but the fact that you are desperate for attention. i don't particularly care about video views. just the fact that i, like EVERYONE else who watched this video is now dumber for having watched it. every time you speak, you make people dumber. you know nothing of me or any of my points other than i pegged your bullshit 100% - dead on. get a life loser.
@kkMonterey Wow i touched a nerve there..its no wonder. like other people who post here who know nothing about real aircraft as opposed to the '911' aircraft..you have no argument. all you can do is attack me. It is called ad hominem argument. Look it up man....
.Do u actually believe a 767(747 has same VSPEEDS)can fly in a controlled manner at sea level at between 500-600 mph OR DO YOU NOT. LETS HEAR YOU AND YOUR KNOWLEDGE Of AIRCRAFT..(no childish insults pls)
No, I know for a FACT that they can not. You should pay closer attention. I'm pointing out that your "evidence" is bullshit. It wastes everyone time and discredits the movement.
@kkMonterey Good man thank you.This is the point of this video.Now can you tell me why this video is bullshit? where is the bullshit?Point by point pls..
1 Wrong plane (sorry but this is the Mt. Everest of F-Ups). 2 You used an outdated video game - you should have at least used FSX, or better yet - X Plane - it is widely accepted as being a far more accurate simulator. 3 You assume "hijackers" couldn't/wouldn't know how to use trim - that is pure speculation - this very video game could teach a person how. OOC
"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." ~George Orwell
@kkMonterey You are a prize clown.Part of the large group on YT who bluster in and give opinions and have no clue what they are talking about.
1. 767 and 747 are widebody jets with almost exactly the same 'flight envelopes'.They have almost identical Va and Vmo speeds for ground level flight. Look it up. you might learn something.What happens to 747 near ground level re: speed will happen to 767.
2. PMDG queen of the skies is the MOST DETAILED CONSUMER LEVEL AND ACCURATE SIM EVER PRODUCED AND IS OFFICIALLY LICENSED BY BOEING.THIS IS WHY I used this and not the stock aircraft from x or fsx.
6 hours in an old style 727 cockpit sim and amazingly the 'highjackers' are capable of trimming this aircraft with 100% accuracy as it descends at over 40% above its certified max speeds.
Anyone with any knowledge of pilot training and the huge hours it takes will know in an instant that this story is rubbish.
Good luck with your movement. Blocked. Moronic arguments with NO substance.
So you're telling me that no planes hit the towers? Your telling me that you're little game is proving hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers who saw planes crash into the towers wrong? Let me guess, aliens helped too, right?
Also note the definition of Vmo. It is max operating and although deliberate operation above this speed is usually not authorised, It can be safely exceeded. Flying outside this limit puts you into the fringe envelope designed with a safety margin in mind. Aircraft will operate normally within the safety margin as it a design directive of the FAA. Vmo also has alot to do with manoeuvring. Full control deflection is not aloud above Vmo but the a/c weren't exactly doing aero's
I would also like to know the Weight and balance settings you had for your 747 as i wonder if they matched the approximate weight of the a/c that crashed.
There is wreckage (documented, photgraphed on display) for all crashes. Have a look at American Eagle Flight 4184 crash pictures and you'll see little of the aircraft remaining.
Me thinks you should be doing the research skyarcher. EA99 airspeed reached its peak calculated value of 0.99 Mach (653KTAS assuming ISA), as the airplane descended through about 22,200 feet msl (prior to levelling off at 16,000 climbing to 24,000 then beginning the final plunge) however the aircraft did not break up until prior to impact when the left engine sheered off.
I have not watched all the videos nor am I an aeronautical engineer. However, what I do know is that an aluminum tube full of kerosene cannot pass through a steel wall. I don't care how fast it is going. Then, this steel structure evaporates into thin air. Something diabolical took place that day.
On the other video the report said that flight 175 descended 6000 fpm, which means that the airplane will exceed it maximum speed, and if that happens the aircraft will be ripped into pieces before it even reach its destination, which really make sense to me! I believe that story is 100% not true.
None of the 'official' information supporting their 911 conclusions re: terrorist attacks are credible in themselves -- why would the modelled speeds of the attack aircraft be an exception? So 'claimed' speeds in themselves cannot be used as a test for the events of 911, ie. the impossibility to exceed 300+ knot speeds at sealevel. Hundreds of vids and photos document the WTC 2 impact, & actual witnesses saw and reported the planes in real time.
Quote : "Hundreds of vids and photos document the WTC 2 impact, & actual witnesses saw and reported the planes in real time."
actually, there are just over 40 vids of this event. How come they contradict eachother? why are there frames removed from others like the famous bob and bri video?
Would u like me to direct you to a video shown on TV where there is no plane at all visible?
Witnesses? Why do many witnesses claim they saw no plane?
Where are the other witnesses testemonies recorded?
your argument in this video is based on the idea that the hijackers did not know how to use the trim tab (something you learn on day 1 in any flight school). Yet now you say they had an understanding of V speeds. the only thing contradicting is you.
A fully loaded commerical airliner cannot travel at 500+mph at 800 feet. As per most of the videos, the "airliner" is not in a dive, it is flying level upon impact of the buildings. There is no deceleration, no separation of wings, engines or tail section, no crumpling and most important, no fireball upon initial impact. There is no explosion noted until AFTER the "plane" has fully entered the building. A JASSM penetrator missile is designed to do that, fully penetrate and then detonate.
How would FEMA, NIST, the military or the FAA even know how fast 175 was going in the first place. The black boxes were never recovered, as per the 9/11 Commission Report. "In Chapter 1, footnote 76, there is the sole but definitive reference to the airline black boxes: The CVRs and the FDRs [voice and flight data recorders] from American 11 and United 175 were not found. Why? Because JASSM missiles hit the towers, not airliners.
Good video, I remember even on mainstream news when they were saying they learned how to fly aircraft with MS flight sim, and they even interviewed someone who wouldn't teach them how to fly, or loan out a crop duster or something
So all the aircraft parts thrown throughout the WTC complex and surrounding areas aren't evidence? Oh, that's right, all that stuff was planted there by the FBI without anyone noticing. Right...
@NYSP22DAVID yep, or they TOOK videos showing people in the background
here's something else, they have been asked the FBI, FAA, NTSB to tell them
WHERE the parts recovered from the airplanes are, and they throw the ball to each other saying.......they have'em, they even say that those parts DON'T have serial numbers.....
ps: do some research about "the passengers" of those flights.
Look, the "no planes" theory is extremely weak. Even conspiracy theorists like Dylan Avery, the guy who made Loose Change, thinks that the "no plane" theory is a joke.
Look, don't tell me that no planes hit the towers. Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers saw it with their own eyes. Sorry, but CGI doesn't work with people who are there.
@NYSP22DAVID The video footage of 911 shows a plane passing through the steel wall of a building without deforming in any way. Now, is this a depiction of reality or is it faked? Yes or no. I can direct you to the original footage if you like also.
So you're telling me that something thousands of people saw with their own eyes wasn't real? That's like telling me that I'm not looking at a computer screen as I type this.
@NYSP22DAVID I will ask you again. The video footage of 911 shows a plane passing through the steel wall of a building without deforming in any way. Now, is this a depiction of reality or is it faked? Yes or no.
Please answer or get lost. Last chance. I didnt ask you what people saw or didnt see.
I will ask you something. Have you ever seen a 767 crash into a building going 545 mph? Before 9/11, no, you haven't. Therefore, you have no idea how an aircraft that large flying that fast will react when it hits a building. Also, the building wasn't a steel wall, it was steel columns with glass. Roughly half of what the aircraft went through was glass. So to answer your question, yes, it was reality. Thousands of people can 100% confirm it. They saw it happen. Can't argue with that
@NYSP22DAVID you just lap it all up. 545 mph at sea level ? ridiculous beyond belief. You know zero about the performance of planes. Check the video on my channel called the 911 aircraft speed lie.
Thousands of people? Why do only people connected with the media mention planes? you have not seen september clues yet?
Where are the thousands testimonies? You will not find them. Just the make believe media story.
@skyarcher You're full of shit pal!! My friend flies a 767 and i asked this question. He said altitude has no bearing on the engine performance or speed. He could run the plane at full throttle at 50 feet if he wanted to.
This whole "Cant fly that fast" BS is all Youtube nonsense.
This plane was descending out of a dive at 10,000ft/min which is unheard of for a commercial aircraft. Punching the throttles to full power with no load on them?
@NYSP22DAVID I asked you a simple question, it is my channel and you have chosen to ignore it. You are banned here. Of course you ignored it by the way. A plane CANNOT pass through a metal wall INTACT - as you well know. This is why you have tried to change the subject and bring a fallacious argument.
@skyarcher A plane did not pass through a building intact. It blew up. And this is not a new thing. 1945 a B-25 crashed into the Empire state building. A much smaller and slower plane actually had an engine blow through the whole floor and land on a build across the street. Although much smaller it still left a very similar hole in the Empire state building. Look it up. But you will probably say they made that one up 66 years ago.
@tmdffn I probably wont say that. I will probably ask you to watch the actual 'crash' footage from CNN. THis video is 1:15 long. I will probably ask you to stop this video and tell me where you can see any deformation of the craft? Please point out any bits from the plane falling down the front of the building? THere is none...did all the plane parts enter the building? It is in slow motion ... so the the reality of the tv fakery is actually clearer )
@skyarcher A 350,000lb long and large object traveling at 500+ mph is not going to just hit and magically stop and fall. the front part of the plane penetrates and deforms...but we cant see that because it is in the building. But it wont stop. It will keep moving (laws of physics/inertia and the fact the WTC was not a solid). The object is still moving. what is in the building is breaking up but the section outside is still moving on the same trajectory and speed.
@tmdffn r u mentul,,,,,,,,,what the fuck is wrong with you,,,,,hahahahaha,,,,,,i think i just peed a little laughing so hard at you,,,,the tower was not a solid,,,,,,,hahahahahahahaha,,,,,,,was it a gas or a liquid?????,,,,wherever the steel beams were we would have seen the massive collision with energy transfer causing aluminum pieces to be smashed ,,,,,,,there would be pieces flynig everywhere on the impact wall,,,,,,,if this was a real crash,,,,,,,which it most definitely was not!
@skyarcher The outside portion of the plane has not yet deformed because it has not came in contact with anything yet. IT is still moving at 500+. Not only is the part of the plane that has penetrated still rapidly moving but it is also being pushed by the tail section which weighs an ass load that is coming in with it. Once through and enough friction and heat have been created. Boom. And the blast will go out the otherside first because that plane has not magically come to a screeching halt.
@tmdffn I asked you something simple. You have not replied. Again, please stop the footage I linked to you and point out where you can see any deformation happening to plane as it impacts one of the strongest structures ever erected by man?
In 1945 the B-25 CRASHED into the Empire State building. The tail section was stuck in the side of the building and plane debris littered the street below.
Had UA 175 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip, there would have been a crash and subsequent explosion upon impacting the OUTSIDE of WTC 2. Instead, UA 175 flew THROUGH the outer steel framed wall unimpeded, no crash, no impact, no deceleration and exploded INSIDE the tower. Impossible.
@lmfecher Not impossible because it happened. With countless hours of amateur video footage and thousands upon thousands of witnesses. Put your foil hat back on and do us all a favor and disappear.
The only place planes flew through steel framed buildings on 9/11 was on the television. Show me one video, just ONE, of UA 175 crashing INTO and exploding upon IMPACTING the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2. Prove me wrong, Skippy.
The great state of Ohio used to produce inventors and critical thinkers. Men like the Wright Brothers, John Patterson and Thomas Watson to name a few. Unfortunately now the great state of Ohio produces too many cowardly, mindless sheeple who CHOOSE to remain in denial about the events of 9/11.
Planes CRASH into buildings, they don't fly THROUGH them.
Show me ONE video of UA 175 crashing into and exploding upon IMPACTING the outside steel framed wall of WTC 2.
True merged.. although i hope a percentage of people who are initially very skeptical see the truth of the situation. Unfortunately TV is designed to knock out human beings critical thinking faculty. Nothing else.
People see all this stuff from a brainwashed perspective.
Again you have missed the point of this video. To see an actual reconstruction of the 'dive' pls refer to my flight 175 reconstruction and not this video.
A large jet will not even go over about 320 knots unless the pilots are fully trained and are able to trim the elevator.
If you have new information as to how these 'hijackers' learnt to accurately the stabilzer of a 767 while it was supposedly going 40% over is Vmo pls bring this info forward.
1. You claim the 'hijackers' flew the planes at speeds way above what they were designed to do and with pin point accuracy. Where did they learn these skills - to trim the plane precisely as it descended and while the overspeed clacker deafened the cockpit? It takes a commerical pilot 2 years and 1000s of hours to learn these skills and he is not overspeeding by 140 knots??
2. Vmo is the speed 767 are certified to fly up to which is 360 knots, 414 miles per hour. you are wrong.
Your logic is brilliant!! You come here and watch this video and THEN complain i am trying to make a case to ignorant douches on youtube.
YOu THEN pick up someone elses false argument(ignorant douche?) and try to engage me with THEIR mistaken argument. Vd 420 does not mean a pilot can fly at that speed or the plane is capable of that.
You actually bought the PMDG aircraft? NO LIFE! Get a real job in aviation if your gonna do that. Oh wait your a little kid right? Talking out of his ass maybe? Look, you are smart for a kid that plays a sim, but seriously, this is a sim.
Back. You can't distinguish any part because everything was on fire after impact. Landing gear was found. Window structure of the american airlines plane was found and is in a museum. Thank you i'm back. Don't try to talk all tough like "come back! You hear?"
Quote "Don't try to talk all tough like " ...this gives me a smile on my face. You are the one who sounds like Enimem !! Anyone reading your 'intelligent' comments may understand which one of us is the one who is trying to come over as 'tough'
I will ask you again. Please direct me to a video where you can see any part of the plane falling to the ground.
This will be difficult because the 'aircraft' shown is digital and not real. That is why it passes through the wall intact.
skyarcher, I'm sorry but this simulator, while it may be the 'best' for a home computer set-up, is nonetheless incorrect, in your example. Or, you intentionaly did not trim the horiz stabilzer. This would affect the software in the sim. Do you even have a pilot's license? Or, just an armchair airline pilot wannabe? Do you know that, all other things equal, when you add thrust and speed increases, the nose will want to come up? That's why we have STAB Trim.
I am aware of Stab trim. This sim will trim the stab in autopilot for a selected low level straight altitude and the nose will pitch down. The plane overspeeds where expected and after about half a minute breaks up.
Here is a question for you. You assume in your response that the 911 'hijackers' had the training, knowledge and experience to accurately 'Trim' a large jet something which takes commerial pilots 2 years and 1000s of hours of training to achieve. Where did u get this info??
Were do you get this? .."2 years an 1000s of hours..." I could put you in a real simulator and have you trimming like a champ in a matter of minutes. Accurately trim a large jet? Who cares how large an airplane is, trim is trim. You have 'archer' in your name. Does this refer to a Piper Archer? Asking because wonder if you have actually flown a real airplane.
IN CASE you do fly small planes, here's a diff. YOU have a 'trim tab' Airliners move the entire horiz stab leading edge...
Simulator. On a home computer. Laughable. The 767 is certified to 420 KCAS in level flight from 0-17800 feet.
Tested, verified in the real world way back in 1983. So spend your life mentally masturbating about "impossible speed." It comes down to: You are wrong. You are laughable. You were irrelevant 7 years ago, and you are irrelevant now. I just find your stupidity comedy gold.
The "Dive Velocity" VD of 420 kts. is a speed that is a maximum for certification flight tests accomplished under 14 CFR Part 25.253 High Speed Characteristics and has not necessarily been achieved but is far above VFC (390 kts. 450 mph) which is the maximum speed at which stability characteristics must be demonstrated (14 CFR 25.253(b)).
You looking at Vd and confusing it with Vmo and Vfc is the bad joke methinks)
Here is a little test for you... point me to any photo, link, or account on the web of any pilot doing 420 knots in a 767. the 911 hijackers needed to find another 80 knots to be doing over 500 knots according to the official story. Before you come back... the 'hijacker pilots' flew with pin point accuracy at this speed.2 inch perfect hits.. so stories of planes falling out of the sky with parts breaking off them do not count.
How bout we put this shill on board a 757 and have Hani Hanjour take him for a ride in his aerobatic bunker busting 757 around the 911 flying circus? Another fine piece my friend.
Fucking traitor! Easy to spot. You have all the plausible deniability lines down pat. So where is the wreckage? Have you seen it? Id like to see it. I think a couple hundred million other Americans would like to see it too!!!
LOL YOUR A FUCKING LOSER? Hmm i'm guessing they removed it after that because american airlines flight 11 77, and united airlines flights 175, and 93 are no longer in use. In any flight, they give the number to a specific route. So 175, is now replaced with a different numbers. A flag is held above the gates of american's used to be flights 11 and 77 as well as united's used to be flights 175 and 93, make sense? It should if your smart "buddy"
When i'm saying hmm i'm not being serious. That is research. A tail number is tagged to the plane itself! The flight number is for a specific route. It's not the same plane each flight (or not the same exact plane flown.)
This world is mysterious. But i can guarentee you 9/11 happened and because your so young, you want to try to be cool by acting along with the rest of the truthers. But whether your a kid or not, you can't lead your own life. Not only do i hear about the official report, but i back it up. I research most of it. Tv fakery? That is probably the biggest and most dumb claim i've ever heard. How do we have so many people in New York who uploaded they're own camera video's of digital planes?
but i thought it was a cruise missile, not a plane.
now i'm confused.
afilonusmajoris 1 month ago
My fema hurts
camh999 1 month ago
if the elevator doesnt work and the aiplane is going up is because you havent put the TRIM right. use the elevator trim properly, then the plane will go straght, the guy flying here dont know how to fly it
mariamole011 2 months ago
@blackjerryboymetal 727's are way smaller than a 767 and a 747. So much smaller that there flight characteristics aren't comparable. I agree that he should have used a 767 model but it probably wasnt available with all the parameters that the 747 model includes. But 767 and 747's have a much closer flight envelope than either do with the 727.
DemonDik 4 months ago in playlist More videos from skyarcher
I bet the man who supposedly flew flight 11 into the WTC would have no idea what to do with the 767's complex instrument panel! This along with never having flown a commercial 767 makes the idea of a successful no flyby impact astronomically miniscule!
DemonDik 4 months ago in playlist More videos from skyarcher
Fuck truthers
Patriot150792 4 months ago
Firstly, why the conflicting speed reports. Secondly, this is an odd test that didn't simulate that actual conditions. It was a 767 that hit the tower. And they nosed down from 26 thousand feet at a rate of 10 000 feet per minute. They could have reached some insane speed during that decline. I don't think they would carry that speed as they leveled out and hit the building tho.
16hypen3sp 4 months ago
@16hypen3sp 10,000 feet per minute? Could they have leveled out from such a steep dive? The throttles were wide open to maintain that high of an airspeed at impact. This kind of control of an aircraft from a guy who had never flown a Boeing 767? This feat alone defies all logic, yet on 9-11-01 THREE such feats happen, without a hitch!
DemonDik 4 months ago in playlist More videos from skyarcher
@DemonDik ya well the feat of me staying at my job for 3 years defies all logic too.... yet it happened.
16hypen3sp 4 months ago
pretty cool.... Love how the Dweebunkers tos around their insults" The government said it happened this way, so it's true God Damn it"
PurePowerPunk 5 months ago
A 767-200 hitting the twin towers is equivalent to shooting a bb gun at a freight train. Since 911 everyone is an expert on aerodynamics, aircraft and jp fuel etc.. Yet most do not even know the basic principle that creates lift for aircraft, let alone the differences between turbofan, turbojet. Now this statement will be attacked with so called "physics experts" LOL.
Aircraft deformation would begin as the aircraft hit the tower yet we didnt see that.
bkayganich 6 months ago
Ridiculous. Use the right plane next time you dumbasses. 767 is entirely different than a 747. FAIL.
NowKillYourself 6 months ago
@NowKillYourself Their V speeds are almost identical.
A question. What is the never exceed speed for a 767 at sea level. What do Boeing, who make the aircraft, claim the never exceed speed is for this aircraft at sea level?
Lets hear you.
skyarcher 6 months ago
@skyarcher Mach 0.50... That's simply a safety standard, it does NOT mean it's impossible to reach such speeds at sea level. Those planes are capable of traveling 500mph at 700 feet. Is it safe? Of course not. Possible? Certainly.
NowKillYourself 6 months ago
@skyarcher A never exceed speed implies that the aircraft can do that speed and more.
AnnRKey 4 months ago
@AnnRKey please contact Boeing and ask them how much faster a plane can do than it's Vne. I await your findings.
skyarcher 4 months ago
@skyarcher Are you saying you don't know how much faster than it's Vne a plane can do?
AnnRKey 4 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If the Pentagon was hit by a missile and not a plane, what happened to the passengers and crew?
How many times did William Rodriguez change his 911 testimony?
If flight 77 was a missile and not a plane, what knocked down the pole lights outside the Pentagon?
ctcole77 2 months ago
@ctcole77 what blew through 3 rings of the pentagon? and, made the same size hole through all 3 rings? Can an aluminum plane do that? What happened to the 'plane' that "hit the pentagon" and all it's contents? No chairs, no luggage, and how did they manage to find DNA samples of all but 2 of the socalled passengers on that plane? If everything but a few pieces 'disappeared', how could they find DNA?
blite13 2 weeks ago
@skyarcher I read somewhere that for a Boeing 767 the never exceed is mach 0.88 at high altitude and below 10000 ft it is somewhere between 420 and 440 kts, but the Master WARNING alarm for overspeed will begin to sound at 360 kts which is the Maximum operation speed below about FL270
thomsonfly645k 2 months ago
@NowKillYourself this will happen with all jetliners of similar size, it is something called lift and the air density at sea level makes the aircraft nose up at higher speeds. A common aspect of most large wide bodied airliners.
DemonDik 4 months ago in playlist More videos from skyarcher
@DemonDik Video evidence shows United Airlines flight 175 flying below 1,000 feet at 223 meters per second. It flew in a straight line, even with the dense air and high speeds.
NowKillYourself 4 months ago
@NowKillYourself . There is video footage of spiderman swinging between buildings at up to 110 metres a second . This proves he can do it. lol
skyarcher 3 months ago
1)The hijackers took control of the flight when they were at cruzing altitude.
2)Use a 767 next time
3)Dont underestimate them
Oh and btw you sound like Stepeh Fucking Hawking, idiot.
MrGeneralKenobi 8 months ago
@MrGeneralKenobi Here is a simple question for you Mr. know all to test your knowledge of aircraft. According to the manufacturer Boeing, what is the max speed of a 767(same as for 747) at ground level ?
Lets hear your answer.
skyarcher 8 months ago
@skyarcher Okay, Col. I know my shit. 747 and 767s have different flight dynamics , so it really doesnt matter. Just cause its "Boeing" doesn't mean at all that one aircraft is like another, since they are all different , in a special way.
MrGeneralKenobi 8 months ago
@MrGeneralKenobi I asked you a question which you have refused to answer.
Here it is again..According to the manufacturer Boeing, what is the max speed of a 767(same as for 747) at ground level?
Just answer the question and stop trying to distract away from it.
Lets hear you.
skyarcher 8 months ago
@skyarcher Where are you KENOBI???
Are you another person with a big mouth and no brain??
Answer my question.
skyarcher 8 months ago
@skyarcher No way!?!? I refused?! Thanks for stating the obvious?! Distract...? Really....? How old are you? What kind of a conversation revolves around 1 question for all of its duration? Btw I saw the your little question so there is no need to waste your energy typing it again or copying and pasting it , if you're that lazy.
Good day sir.
MrGeneralKenobi 8 months ago
@MrGeneralKenobi I ask you a question which you cannot answer for if you did answer it correctly would prove my point here and you would be exposed as the blathering idiot you actually are.
Run away then back to all mouth no brain land.
Next please.
skyarcher 8 months ago
@skyarcher I chose not to....? By thinking that you "debunk" people , I can see that , that helps your shrinking ego. Next please.
MrGeneralKenobi 8 months ago
@MrGeneralKenobi Back again? just answer the question I asked you ... look it up or something or ring boeing lol
skyarcher 8 months ago
@skyarcher Max speed of a Boeing 747-400: Mach 0.92, 533 knots, 614mph at 35,000 feet. The 767-200's maximum cruise speed at 35k feet is 493 knots or 568mph. So, NO, the planes are NOT the same. You are not comparing apples to apples. You need to test fly a 767-200 with the EXACT fuel load, passenger/cargo load as well. Sure it's unsafe to fly at 500+ mph at 700 feet alt. [ALT. of #175 on impact; 9/11] but it's definitely NOT impossible.
NowKillYourself 6 months ago
@skyarcher If they answer your question that would defeat their purpose. Their purpose is not to answer questions, but to confuse the issue for as long as they can. They work for the government. The shadow government. The shadow government knows that it's plans to wipe out 90 percent of the population is not proceeding according to plan and that their time is almost up. The shadow government never bothered to inform the dis-information agents that their work is no longer needed.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch my Video lol on my channel see if ya like it no bad comm please thanks.
iryan74656 9 months ago
Really a video Game? Just call boeing. And the high jackers had more than 6 hours. They achieved their CPL's. One actually applied for a job as a commercial pilot. But hey you are the expert playing your video games.
tmdffn 11 months ago
Lol, do a better research idiot, Osama Bin Laden used his best pilots to make these attacks.
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
I asked my friend who flies a 767 this question. No problem!! Was his answer. Especially when the aircraft is coming out of a dive. Which it was. No load on the engines?
Easy!!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal Full throttle means what to you? What was the speed of the aircraft?
stormholloway 1 year ago
9/11 - operation northwoods in full bloom.
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal The only real evidence suggests that you have inherited (among other things) the same nervous twitch that the other government swallowing sycophants that park here have demonstrated so stop right there, you talking monkey…you shouldn’t be giving us truthers anything less than the best ass kissing performance you are capable of.
Seigu007 1 year ago
I'd just like to know how you think that thousands of people could have possibly seen something that wasn't really there. Did the government brainwash thousands of New Yorkers? Did they put CGI planes into their thoughts? Hurry, put a tinfoil hat on.
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
To answer the question from your description - I guess you're right. Planes didn't hit the towers, I no longer believe that... I guess the towers are still standing and 3000+ people are still alive enjoying time with their families...
In case you're too stupid to realize - that (above) is sarcasm. You, sir, are an idiot.
scubadogg 1 year ago
The Flight 175 was Boeing 767-200 CLS not Boeing 747-400 PMDG
gfast2 1 year ago
could you make it again with 767? cuz its aerodynamics are different, nice simulation though and i agree that the speed presented by the government is fake
buzzzatho 1 year ago
why is Stephen Hawkins doing the commentry?
phucoff1 1 year ago
@phucoff1 why is puff the magic dragon commenting on this video?
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher
haha, yeah good one (???), need to remember that one!
phucoff1 1 year ago
The B727 has turbojets and the B767 has turbofans. Turbofans large front high bypass fan cannot handle the amount of air density at low altitude. The M.I.T, F.A.A, NIST and FEMA speeds are clearly ridiculous. Also, the videos showing 175 impacting the S. Tower all show no deceleration as it encounters the steel building. Try it yourself with any of these "impact" videos: F=ma=m(0)=0 force on building.
count the frames for the plane to fly nose to tail in air and again when the nose contacts.
flowingeddie 1 year ago
@flowingeddie Common sense Flowingeddie. Fair play.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal
There is only one dummy in this conversation mate )
You appear to know absolutely nothing about aircraft speeds and limitations at different altitudes? and you appear to have learnt nothing at all from this video regarding these matters which was the reason i posted it?
Having any further dialogue with you is like me talking to someone who believes the magic of Santa Claus is what enables powered flight?
good luck and good riddance.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal What do u know about the performance of aircraft? are u an expert?
skyarcher 1 year ago
parasite drag and parasite power were both violated
clovagZv 1 year ago
set the trim stab.... holy crap. Yeah it may be over speeding, and the elevator may have ripped off, but seriously dude learn what trim stab is. Then take a course on True airspeed vs indicated airspeed. Theres a mad difference. You look silly, you can't even hold 1000 ft, and you keep pushing forward violently like a monkey. TRIM THE PLAN.
d0rkiishchris 1 year ago
how can i get this mod or what it is?
TheEGEG 1 year ago
Suggest you get FSX and Level-D 767 and use your own fucking voice.
Weirdo10o4 1 year ago
Is this trying ot prove the plane didn't hit the Pentagon because large identifiable pieces of it like the tail section with the logo were all over the front lawn. We were lied to about many things surrounding that day but that plane definetely went into the Pentagon.
johntitorlives 1 year ago
For a QUALITY analysis of the flights of 9/11, please go here
watch?v=eD2M8GGTOKA&feature=related
Part's 3 and 4 out of 16 are pretty good...
kkMonterey 1 year ago
Ummmmmmm, this is a 747 (note the engine readout on the center display panel - 4 engines). Flight 175 was a 767-222. As for the program - looks like MS Flight Simulator X.
One of the other guys was right - the plane needs to be re-trimmed as you gain speed - this is true in any aircraft (ok, not sure about the B2 bomber, etc). Otherwise, as you gain speed, the nose will invariably lift up. I'm guessing the author is about 15 years old (this is why he over-dubbed the computer voice).
kkMonterey 1 year ago
@kkMonterey Goon. I mention in the very first minute that the aircraft is not a 767 but a 747. Both aircraft have nearly exactly the same V speeds. It is MS Fs2004 not X. wrong.
If i choose to make a video and write out the dialogue for it and use my computer to read that dialogue that is my choice. I have made videos. You have not. I have 165,000 video views. You have none. I know however 15 yr olds who make better and more intelligent points than you do.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher
ah.. '04, not X. wow, you're right! that proves everything. this video sucks and proves nothing but the fact that you are desperate for attention. i don't particularly care about video views. just the fact that i, like EVERYONE else who watched this video is now dumber for having watched it. every time you speak, you make people dumber. you know nothing of me or any of my points other than i pegged your bullshit 100% - dead on. get a life loser.
kkMonterey 1 year ago
@kkMonterey Wow i touched a nerve there..its no wonder. like other people who post here who know nothing about real aircraft as opposed to the '911' aircraft..you have no argument. all you can do is attack me. It is called ad hominem argument. Look it up man....
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher
I know 9/11 was an inside job dipshit. I was attacking your bullshit video and your bullshit evidence. Get a clue.
kkMonterey 1 year ago
@kkMonterey
No lets get down to business.
.Do u actually believe a 767(747 has same VSPEEDS)can fly in a controlled manner at sea level at between 500-600 mph OR DO YOU NOT. LETS HEAR YOU AND YOUR KNOWLEDGE Of AIRCRAFT..(no childish insults pls)
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher
No, I know for a FACT that they can not. You should pay closer attention. I'm pointing out that your "evidence" is bullshit. It wastes everyone time and discredits the movement.
kkMonterey 1 year ago
@kkMonterey Good man thank you.This is the point of this video.Now can you tell me why this video is bullshit? where is the bullshit?Point by point pls..
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher
1 Wrong plane (sorry but this is the Mt. Everest of F-Ups). 2 You used an outdated video game - you should have at least used FSX, or better yet - X Plane - it is widely accepted as being a far more accurate simulator. 3 You assume "hijackers" couldn't/wouldn't know how to use trim - that is pure speculation - this very video game could teach a person how. OOC
"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." ~George Orwell
kkMonterey 1 year ago 3
@kkMonterey You are a prize clown.Part of the large group on YT who bluster in and give opinions and have no clue what they are talking about.
1. 767 and 747 are widebody jets with almost exactly the same 'flight envelopes'.They have almost identical Va and Vmo speeds for ground level flight. Look it up. you might learn something.What happens to 747 near ground level re: speed will happen to 767.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@kkMonterey you are a prize clown part 2.
2. PMDG queen of the skies is the MOST DETAILED CONSUMER LEVEL AND ACCURATE SIM EVER PRODUCED AND IS OFFICIALLY LICENSED BY BOEING.THIS IS WHY I used this and not the stock aircraft from x or fsx.
Look it up. You might learn something.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@kkMonterey You are a prize clown part 3.
6 hours in an old style 727 cockpit sim and amazingly the 'highjackers' are capable of trimming this aircraft with 100% accuracy as it descends at over 40% above its certified max speeds.
Anyone with any knowledge of pilot training and the huge hours it takes will know in an instant that this story is rubbish.
Good luck with your movement. Blocked. Moronic arguments with NO substance.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher
So you're telling me that no planes hit the towers? Your telling me that you're little game is proving hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers who saw planes crash into the towers wrong? Let me guess, aliens helped too, right?
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
lmao WHY DO PUSSSY OLES USE COMPUTER VOICES THERE EASILY REVERSABLE MORON
Scumbagheadpoo 1 year ago
The stupidest comment ever on this video?
possibly.
skyarcher 1 year ago 2
Ever thought of using the trim? Because that's why he starts climbing...
PSkyflyer 1 year ago
Apologies, first post below should read Egype Air Flight 990, not EA99. Hope it clears any confusion that it may have caused
wranga1app 2 years ago
Also note the definition of Vmo. It is max operating and although deliberate operation above this speed is usually not authorised, It can be safely exceeded. Flying outside this limit puts you into the fringe envelope designed with a safety margin in mind. Aircraft will operate normally within the safety margin as it a design directive of the FAA. Vmo also has alot to do with manoeuvring. Full control deflection is not aloud above Vmo but the a/c weren't exactly doing aero's
wranga1app 2 years ago
I would also like to know the Weight and balance settings you had for your 747 as i wonder if they matched the approximate weight of the a/c that crashed.
There is wreckage (documented, photgraphed on display) for all crashes. Have a look at American Eagle Flight 4184 crash pictures and you'll see little of the aircraft remaining.
wranga1app 2 years ago
Me thinks you should be doing the research skyarcher. EA99 airspeed reached its peak calculated value of 0.99 Mach (653KTAS assuming ISA), as the airplane descended through about 22,200 feet msl (prior to levelling off at 16,000 climbing to 24,000 then beginning the final plunge) however the aircraft did not break up until prior to impact when the left engine sheered off.
wranga1app 2 years ago
good points lads. Check out september clues here on youtube for the full gory details.
skyarcher 2 years ago
I have not watched all the videos nor am I an aeronautical engineer. However, what I do know is that an aluminum tube full of kerosene cannot pass through a steel wall. I don't care how fast it is going. Then, this steel structure evaporates into thin air. Something diabolical took place that day.
Excop95 2 years ago
this is a website that records all "accidents" that have happened in USA
they don't show any debris from all 4 flights involved on 911
w w w . airdisaster . c o m
merged 2 years ago
thanks skyarcher, this an easy test that anyone can do, I expect some moronic answers, if there's any
merged 2 years ago
plane huggers.....drive an 18 wheeler and try to control it like you do with the car you drive.
merged 2 years ago
great analogy merged.
skyarcher 2 years ago
On the other video the report said that flight 175 descended 6000 fpm, which means that the airplane will exceed it maximum speed, and if that happens the aircraft will be ripped into pieces before it even reach its destination, which really make sense to me! I believe that story is 100% not true.
bandora11 2 years ago
im not gunna say anything but get ur facts straight bud
Scythix16 2 years ago
the hijackers probably got lucky =.=
neobattle2 2 years ago
... Use the level d 767
lewisduncan93 2 years ago
None of them contradict each other. You're just a nutter seeing what he wants to see.
jjjjj64 2 years ago
None of the 'official' information supporting their 911 conclusions re: terrorist attacks are credible in themselves -- why would the modelled speeds of the attack aircraft be an exception? So 'claimed' speeds in themselves cannot be used as a test for the events of 911, ie. the impossibility to exceed 300+ knot speeds at sealevel. Hundreds of vids and photos document the WTC 2 impact, & actual witnesses saw and reported the planes in real time.
I dunno about the Penn or Pentagon crash sites.
starmanskye 2 years ago
Quote : "Hundreds of vids and photos document the WTC 2 impact, & actual witnesses saw and reported the planes in real time."
actually, there are just over 40 vids of this event. How come they contradict eachother? why are there frames removed from others like the famous bob and bri video?
Would u like me to direct you to a video shown on TV where there is no plane at all visible?
Witnesses? Why do many witnesses claim they saw no plane?
Where are the other witnesses testemonies recorded?
skyarcher 2 years ago
Comment removed
jjjjj64 2 years ago
where can i see the video shown on tv where there is no plane visible?
mickles21486 2 years ago
/watch?v=irhy54eASzo
PLS note ... this footage has a BACKGROUND...!! all other footage the background has been removed...
skyarcher 2 years ago
Why didn't you use the aircraft said to have been used on 9/11, aka the 767, Level-D Simulations makes a great realistic 767.
Airportchris2 2 years ago
Strawman lies.. planes can be throttled. Any cunt knows that. The sepcs are safety margins. Why would suicidals give a fuck about safety?
Microsoft Sam is used by cowards.. fags!
CleetzI337 2 years ago
Thanks for your interest in my videos)
Quote "Why would suicidals give a fuck about safety?"
Do you have any intelligence? If there were real hi jackers why would they risk destroying their aircraft before it hit the towers?
Do you know anything about V speeds?? What do Boeing themselves say about exceeding these speeds??
skyarcher 2 years ago
your argument in this video is based on the idea that the hijackers did not know how to use the trim tab (something you learn on day 1 in any flight school). Yet now you say they had an understanding of V speeds. the only thing contradicting is you.
skymonkey81 2 years ago
Actually there were no 'they' .. no hijackers, so i dont think 'they' thought anything.
The contradictions you speak of are there in the made up narrative.
Ok...you tell us how 'they' did it?
Changed a 767 into a jet fighter?
Step by step pls.
skyarcher 2 years ago
A fully loaded commerical airliner cannot travel at 500+mph at 800 feet. As per most of the videos, the "airliner" is not in a dive, it is flying level upon impact of the buildings. There is no deceleration, no separation of wings, engines or tail section, no crumpling and most important, no fireball upon initial impact. There is no explosion noted until AFTER the "plane" has fully entered the building. A JASSM penetrator missile is designed to do that, fully penetrate and then detonate.
lmfecher 2 years ago
Comment removed
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
You have to either attend highschool physic, or to take your thorazine.
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
How would FEMA, NIST, the military or the FAA even know how fast 175 was going in the first place. The black boxes were never recovered, as per the 9/11 Commission Report. "In Chapter 1, footnote 76, there is the sole but definitive reference to the airline black boxes: The CVRs and the FDRs [voice and flight data recorders] from American 11 and United 175 were not found. Why? Because JASSM missiles hit the towers, not airliners.
lmfecher 2 years ago
Good video, I remember even on mainstream news when they were saying they learned how to fly aircraft with MS flight sim, and they even interviewed someone who wouldn't teach them how to fly, or loan out a crop duster or something
meth062 2 years ago
the evidence is that the government does NOT have any avidence that aircrafts were used in ¨the attacks ¨on 911
merged 2 years ago 8
@merged
So all the aircraft parts thrown throughout the WTC complex and surrounding areas aren't evidence? Oh, that's right, all that stuff was planted there by the FBI without anyone noticing. Right...
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID yep, or they TOOK videos showing people in the background
here's something else, they have been asked the FBI, FAA, NTSB to tell them
WHERE the parts recovered from the airplanes are, and they throw the ball to each other saying.......they have'em, they even say that those parts DON'T have serial numbers.....
ps: do some research about "the passengers" of those flights.
merged 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID Ah! check this web site....
w w w pilotsfor911truth . org
These are professional pilots, they know that airplanes were NOT involved 0n 911
but they don't say it !!
merged 1 year ago
@merged
Look, the "no planes" theory is extremely weak. Even conspiracy theorists like Dylan Avery, the guy who made Loose Change, thinks that the "no plane" theory is a joke.
Look, don't tell me that no planes hit the towers. Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers saw it with their own eyes. Sorry, but CGI doesn't work with people who are there.
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID The video footage of 911 shows a plane passing through the steel wall of a building without deforming in any way. Now, is this a depiction of reality or is it faked? Yes or no. I can direct you to the original footage if you like also.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher
So you're telling me that something thousands of people saw with their own eyes wasn't real? That's like telling me that I'm not looking at a computer screen as I type this.
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID I will ask you again. The video footage of 911 shows a plane passing through the steel wall of a building without deforming in any way. Now, is this a depiction of reality or is it faked? Yes or no.
Please answer or get lost. Last chance. I didnt ask you what people saw or didnt see.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher
I will ask you something. Have you ever seen a 767 crash into a building going 545 mph? Before 9/11, no, you haven't. Therefore, you have no idea how an aircraft that large flying that fast will react when it hits a building. Also, the building wasn't a steel wall, it was steel columns with glass. Roughly half of what the aircraft went through was glass. So to answer your question, yes, it was reality. Thousands of people can 100% confirm it. They saw it happen. Can't argue with that
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID you just lap it all up. 545 mph at sea level ? ridiculous beyond belief. You know zero about the performance of planes. Check the video on my channel called the 911 aircraft speed lie.
Thousands of people? Why do only people connected with the media mention planes? you have not seen september clues yet?
Where are the thousands testimonies? You will not find them. Just the make believe media story.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher You're full of shit pal!! My friend flies a 767 and i asked this question. He said altitude has no bearing on the engine performance or speed. He could run the plane at full throttle at 50 feet if he wanted to.
This whole "Cant fly that fast" BS is all Youtube nonsense.
This plane was descending out of a dive at 10,000ft/min which is unheard of for a commercial aircraft. Punching the throttles to full power with no load on them?
No problem!! And 50 videos prove it.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles This is the internet I can say anything on the internet.... we all have friends who fly 767s lol
What is the name of your friend and what airline does he fly for? I am sure he would not mind confirming these details?
lets hear you.....
skyarcher 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID I asked you a simple question, it is my channel and you have chosen to ignore it. You are banned here. Of course you ignored it by the way. A plane CANNOT pass through a metal wall INTACT - as you well know. This is why you have tried to change the subject and bring a fallacious argument.
Good riddance.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher A plane did not pass through a building intact. It blew up. And this is not a new thing. 1945 a B-25 crashed into the Empire state building. A much smaller and slower plane actually had an engine blow through the whole floor and land on a build across the street. Although much smaller it still left a very similar hole in the Empire state building. Look it up. But you will probably say they made that one up 66 years ago.
tmdffn 11 months ago
@tmdffn I probably wont say that. I will probably ask you to watch the actual 'crash' footage from CNN. THis video is 1:15 long. I will probably ask you to stop this video and tell me where you can see any deformation of the craft? Please point out any bits from the plane falling down the front of the building? THere is none...did all the plane parts enter the building? It is in slow motion ... so the the reality of the tv fakery is actually clearer )
stop the video. Point it out please.
skyarcher 11 months ago
@skyarcher A 350,000lb long and large object traveling at 500+ mph is not going to just hit and magically stop and fall. the front part of the plane penetrates and deforms...but we cant see that because it is in the building. But it wont stop. It will keep moving (laws of physics/inertia and the fact the WTC was not a solid). The object is still moving. what is in the building is breaking up but the section outside is still moving on the same trajectory and speed.
tmdffn 11 months ago
@tmdffn r u mentul,,,,,,,,,what the fuck is wrong with you,,,,,hahahahaha,,,,,,i think i just peed a little laughing so hard at you,,,,the tower was not a solid,,,,,,,hahahahahahahaha,,,,,,,was it a gas or a liquid?????,,,,wherever the steel beams were we would have seen the massive collision with energy transfer causing aluminum pieces to be smashed ,,,,,,,there would be pieces flynig everywhere on the impact wall,,,,,,,if this was a real crash,,,,,,,which it most definitely was not!
bigbopper993 9 months ago
@bigbopper993 The outer portion of the building was 75% glass. Pretty sure a plane would have no problem with it.
tmdffn 8 months ago
@bigbopper993 Don't quit your day job...your standup SUCKS.
tmdffn 8 months ago
@skyarcher The outside portion of the plane has not yet deformed because it has not came in contact with anything yet. IT is still moving at 500+. Not only is the part of the plane that has penetrated still rapidly moving but it is also being pushed by the tail section which weighs an ass load that is coming in with it. Once through and enough friction and heat have been created. Boom. And the blast will go out the otherside first because that plane has not magically come to a screeching halt.
tmdffn 11 months ago
@tmdffn I asked you something simple. You have not replied. Again, please stop the footage I linked to you and point out where you can see any deformation happening to plane as it impacts one of the strongest structures ever erected by man?
Please stop blustering and answer the question.
skyarcher 11 months ago
@skyarcher This is not a small object. And the laws of physics/inertia do permit this to happen.
tmdffn 11 months ago
@tmdffn
In 1945 the B-25 CRASHED into the Empire State building. The tail section was stuck in the side of the building and plane debris littered the street below.
Had UA 175 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip, there would have been a crash and subsequent explosion upon impacting the OUTSIDE of WTC 2. Instead, UA 175 flew THROUGH the outer steel framed wall unimpeded, no crash, no impact, no deceleration and exploded INSIDE the tower. Impossible.
lmfecher 8 months ago
@lmfecher Not impossible because it happened. With countless hours of amateur video footage and thousands upon thousands of witnesses. Put your foil hat back on and do us all a favor and disappear.
tmdffn 8 months ago
@tmdffn
The only place planes flew through steel framed buildings on 9/11 was on the television. Show me one video, just ONE, of UA 175 crashing INTO and exploding upon IMPACTING the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2. Prove me wrong, Skippy.
lmfecher 8 months ago
@tmdffn
The great state of Ohio used to produce inventors and critical thinkers. Men like the Wright Brothers, John Patterson and Thomas Watson to name a few. Unfortunately now the great state of Ohio produces too many cowardly, mindless sheeple who CHOOSE to remain in denial about the events of 9/11.
Planes CRASH into buildings, they don't fly THROUGH them.
Show me ONE video of UA 175 crashing into and exploding upon IMPACTING the outside steel framed wall of WTC 2.
lmfecher 8 months ago
@NYSP22DAVID It's nice seeing another sane person around. :)
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
@merged what about the footage that played everywhere?
videomakerman1232 9 months ago
Comment removed
teratornid 2 years ago
sky, it's hard to deal with people who lack of common sense, even havin' the evidence in front of them.
merged 2 years ago
True merged.. although i hope a percentage of people who are initially very skeptical see the truth of the situation. Unfortunately TV is designed to knock out human beings critical thinking faculty. Nothing else.
People see all this stuff from a brainwashed perspective.
skyarcher 2 years ago
"Ninja cat comes closer while not moving!"
stick to what you know )
420 knots is not a certified speed it is a max speed which is not necessarily achieved during flight testing.
Keep posting and you may convince yourself.
Have you heard of this Vdf? demonstrated dive speed?
You make the mistake of confusing Vmo with Vd.
You see a plane going through a steel wall intact and think all is hunky dory.
You are brainwashed. Enjoy your existence it must be fun.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Yeah your a little kid aren't you or else you'd be talking? It was a 767! And came out of a dive! A sim is a fucking sim asshole.
Fsxroflcopter 2 years ago
Again you have missed the point of this video. To see an actual reconstruction of the 'dive' pls refer to my flight 175 reconstruction and not this video.
A large jet will not even go over about 320 knots unless the pilots are fully trained and are able to trim the elevator.
If you have new information as to how these 'hijackers' learnt to accurately the stabilzer of a 767 while it was supposedly going 40% over is Vmo pls bring this info forward.
Otherwise try to post more intelligent comments
skyarcher 2 years ago
Do hijackers about to crash planes into buildings care if they are exceeding the recommended flight limits?
Not so much.
767's are certified to fly up to 420 knots KCAS all the way down to sea level. Documented in A1NM, 767 in 1983.
Objective evidence they can go even faster? Sure. 9/11 they did. TWOOFAH DOWN!
HumanShot 2 years ago
Here is a little test for you... Do hijackers about to crash planes into buildings care if they are exceeding the recommended flight limits?
Not so much.
767's are certified to fly up to 420 knots KCAS all the way down to sea level. Documented in A1NM, 767 in 1983.
Objective evidence they can go even faster? Sure. 9/11 they did. TWOOFAH DOWN!
HumanShot 2 years ago
1. You claim the 'hijackers' flew the planes at speeds way above what they were designed to do and with pin point accuracy. Where did they learn these skills - to trim the plane precisely as it descended and while the overspeed clacker deafened the cockpit? It takes a commerical pilot 2 years and 1000s of hours to learn these skills and he is not overspeeding by 140 knots??
2. Vmo is the speed 767 are certified to fly up to which is 360 knots, 414 miles per hour. you are wrong.
skyarcher 2 years ago
No claim to it. They did. WHOOPS!
767's are certified to fly up to 420 knots KCAS all the way down to sea level. Documented in A1NM, 767 in 1983.
Objective evidence they can go even faster? Sure. 9/11 they did. TWOOFAH DOWN!
HumanShot 2 years ago
Poor fellow. If as you say a 767 is 'certified' to fly at 420 knots what is the point of having a Vmo maximum operating velocity of 360 knots?
Please explain.
the 'objective evidence' you speak of is TV footage! Do you believe everything you see on TV?
The Tv footage showed us a plane passing through a steel wall without the plane deforming in any way..
It is faked. You have been duped.
skyarcher 2 years ago
"You have been duped." Really? I am not the douche trying to make a case to a bunch of other ignorant douches on youtube....
Rofolol. Enjoy your flat earth society.
Nousides 2 years ago
"I am not the douche trying to make a case to a bunch of other ignorant douches on youtube...."
Thanks for taking the time to stop here and watch this video. l...o...f^&kin....l
skyarcher 2 years ago
767's are certified to fly up to 420 knots KCAS all the way down to sea level. Documented in A1NM, 767 in 1983.
Objective evidence they can go even faster? Sure. 9/11 they did. TWOOFAH DOWN!
Nousides 2 years ago
YOu do a side line in parrotry also?
Your logic is brilliant!! You come here and watch this video and THEN complain i am trying to make a case to ignorant douches on youtube.
YOu THEN pick up someone elses false argument(ignorant douche?) and try to engage me with THEIR mistaken argument. Vd 420 does not mean a pilot can fly at that speed or the plane is capable of that.
Thanks for your (last) visit.
skyarcher 2 years ago
You actually bought the PMDG aircraft? NO LIFE! Get a real job in aviation if your gonna do that. Oh wait your a little kid right? Talking out of his ass maybe? Look, you are smart for a kid that plays a sim, but seriously, this is a sim.
Fsxroflcopter 2 years ago
"Ad Hominem" Look this up.
This describes a situation where a person cannot argue a point and instead attempts to win an argument by attacking the person they are arguing with.
It is very easy to spot and this what you are doing here.
Look at FOx news to see how it works at a corporate level.
PMDG 747 is officially licensed by Boeing. It is a very accurate representation of the performance of a large jet.
How do you know I do not work in aviation??
How do you know??
skyarcher 2 years ago
Back. You can't distinguish any part because everything was on fire after impact. Landing gear was found. Window structure of the american airlines plane was found and is in a museum. Thank you i'm back. Don't try to talk all tough like "come back! You hear?"
Fsxroflcopter 2 years ago
Quote "Don't try to talk all tough like " ...this gives me a smile on my face. You are the one who sounds like Enimem !! Anyone reading your 'intelligent' comments may understand which one of us is the one who is trying to come over as 'tough'
I will ask you again. Please direct me to a video where you can see any part of the plane falling to the ground.
This will be difficult because the 'aircraft' shown is digital and not real. That is why it passes through the wall intact.
Just one video.
skyarcher 2 years ago
skyarcher, I'm sorry but this simulator, while it may be the 'best' for a home computer set-up, is nonetheless incorrect, in your example. Or, you intentionaly did not trim the horiz stabilzer. This would affect the software in the sim. Do you even have a pilot's license? Or, just an armchair airline pilot wannabe? Do you know that, all other things equal, when you add thrust and speed increases, the nose will want to come up? That's why we have STAB Trim.
Redo your test, with trim.
767Captain 2 years ago
I am aware of Stab trim. This sim will trim the stab in autopilot for a selected low level straight altitude and the nose will pitch down. The plane overspeeds where expected and after about half a minute breaks up.
Here is a question for you. You assume in your response that the 911 'hijackers' had the training, knowledge and experience to accurately 'Trim' a large jet something which takes commerial pilots 2 years and 1000s of hours of training to achieve. Where did u get this info??
skyarcher 2 years ago
Were do you get this? .."2 years an 1000s of hours..." I could put you in a real simulator and have you trimming like a champ in a matter of minutes. Accurately trim a large jet? Who cares how large an airplane is, trim is trim. You have 'archer' in your name. Does this refer to a Piper Archer? Asking because wonder if you have actually flown a real airplane.
IN CASE you do fly small planes, here's a diff. YOU have a 'trim tab' Airliners move the entire horiz stab leading edge...
767Captain 2 years ago
767Captain,
Why don't you just go ahead and do your own video using the same flight sim and prove him wrong. Should be an easy enough task-Right?
Post it as a video response to this video.
chriskendall1 2 years ago 3
Simulator. On a home computer. Laughable. The 767 is certified to 420 KCAS in level flight from 0-17800 feet.
Tested, verified in the real world way back in 1983. So spend your life mentally masturbating about "impossible speed." It comes down to: You are wrong. You are laughable. You were irrelevant 7 years ago, and you are irrelevant now. I just find your stupidity comedy gold.
HumanShot 2 years ago
will you look at my video called "911 aircraft speed lie" and come back.
you have made a huge error. see if yu can spot it )
skyarcher 2 years ago
Certification sheet A1NM, 767. Tough shit there twoofie da clown. Certified 420 knots KCAS in 1983.
Google it yourself. Or was that document planted too... 18 years before the event...
HumanShot 2 years ago
420 kcas Vd (velocity dive) TO 18,000 feet in absolute emergency!
Below this altitude the absolute maximum speed the aircraft is certified to is 360 kcas.
this is called VMo (maximum operating velocity)
You are terribly confused by all this.
This is the problem when armchair experts 'GOOGLE' information but do not have the technical background to process that information.
What do you say now sweetheart??
lets hear you.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Your lack of knowledge about aircraft certification is not our problem. 420 knots KCAS from 17800 to 0.
Tested, certified, owned.
You are a perfect example of why twoofahs are bad jokes.
HumanShot 2 years ago
Vd is not a certification speed !!
The "Dive Velocity" VD of 420 kts. is a speed that is a maximum for certification flight tests accomplished under 14 CFR Part 25.253 High Speed Characteristics and has not necessarily been achieved but is far above VFC (390 kts. 450 mph) which is the maximum speed at which stability characteristics must be demonstrated (14 CFR 25.253(b)).
You looking at Vd and confusing it with Vmo and Vfc is the bad joke methinks)
skyarcher 2 years ago
"Vd is not a certification speed" Tell the FAA. Tell them they didn't do the testing and certify the plane.
Documented in A1NM, 767 in 1983. TWOOFAH DOWN!
HumanShot 2 years ago
Here is a little test for you... point me to any photo, link, or account on the web of any pilot doing 420 knots in a 767. the 911 hijackers needed to find another 80 knots to be doing over 500 knots according to the official story. Before you come back... the 'hijacker pilots' flew with pin point accuracy at this speed.2 inch perfect hits.. so stories of planes falling out of the sky with parts breaking off them do not count.
skyarcher 2 years ago
How bout we put this shill on board a 757 and have Hani Hanjour take him for a ride in his aerobatic bunker busting 757 around the 911 flying circus? Another fine piece my friend.
izzysykopth 2 years ago 2
Fucking traitor! Easy to spot. You have all the plausible deniability lines down pat. So where is the wreckage? Have you seen it? Id like to see it. I think a couple hundred million other Americans would like to see it too!!!
izzysykopth 2 years ago 2
Saw some landing gear. In a muesam there's a piece of american 11, it was a window! BITCH! TWOOFAH DOWN LOLZZ FUCK YOU
Fsxroflcopter 2 years ago
LOL! What a fucking loser! Then you can explain why the Bureau of Transportation Stats has no record of two of the flights. Well? Explain please.
izzysykopth 2 years ago
LOL YOUR A FUCKING LOSER? Hmm i'm guessing they removed it after that because american airlines flight 11 77, and united airlines flights 175, and 93 are no longer in use. In any flight, they give the number to a specific route. So 175, is now replaced with a different numbers. A flag is held above the gates of american's used to be flights 11 and 77 as well as united's used to be flights 175 and 93, make sense? It should if your smart "buddy"
Fsxroflcopter 2 years ago
Quote : "Hmm i'm guessing"
Unfortunately your guessing is wrong again Mr fsx.
Please stop guessing and do some actual research.
2 flights are logged as taking off.
All 4 planes were deregistered after 911... still flying and below are the dates they were deregistered on.
Flight 11, tail number N334AA 14.01.2002
Flight 77, tail number N644AA,14.01.2002
Flight 175, tail number N612UA,28.09.2005!
Flight 93,tail number N591UA,28.09.2005
Please check your facts before leaving ignorant comments
skyarcher 2 years ago
When i'm saying hmm i'm not being serious. That is research. A tail number is tagged to the plane itself! The flight number is for a specific route. It's not the same plane each flight (or not the same exact plane flown.)
Fsxroflcopter 2 years ago
Again you miss the point. The supposed 'planes' which crashed into WTC had a unique tail number. These aircraft were still in use after 911.
Explain please. How the 'aricraft' that crashed, with unique tail numbers, were deregistered in 2002 and 2005!
Please explain.
skyarcher 2 years ago
This world is mysterious. But i can guarentee you 9/11 happened and because your so young, you want to try to be cool by acting along with the rest of the truthers. But whether your a kid or not, you can't lead your own life. Not only do i hear about the official report, but i back it up. I research most of it. Tv fakery? That is probably the biggest and most dumb claim i've ever heard. How do we have so many people in New York who uploaded they're own camera video's of digital planes?
Fsxroflcopter 2 years ago