Added: 1 year ago
From: NASAtelevision
Views: 28,881
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (144)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I visited your channel

  • that planet looks cool.. but it moves fast... its always on a hassle.. LOL!

  • how come the kepler team hasnt announced any discovories in the last couple of mounths? is it just me or are they taking there old sweet time ??

  • Closed Captioning: NASA's keplar spacecraft has discomfort kepler ten b its first iraqi planet and the smallest transiting excel planet discovered today kept attending is only one point four times the size of hearst... ...is not in the happen a bulls...etc.

    It also reveals that that lady say uh... a lot.

  • Could not laughing at myself, I will protect you huh. hahahahhahah

    All I can do is just help you thats all. lol

  • Hey, its not nice being on the other side. I know, but if you do decide just remember that you are not alone. Most people are scared of saying anything, you can handle this. I WILL make sure you are ok, but you must try at least.

  • Oh good for u, so happy now. Really

  • Ok, I have forwarded you with instructions that was given to me. Thankyou for coming forward, but you need to make a decision now. I quess you are safe as it stands now, I think you are a really smart guy. Don't give away any infomation yet, just wait until we know we can handle this. If you do decide to make this dump, you have to just leave and never return, straight up! But you already know this...

  • YOu have to add the ww.org, but most of you know this. Look you can't keep blocking me from posting. Even if this trap is sprung, the more you try to block me the more I will post on this site.

  • samsonblinded org/news/stuxnet-clarified-207­52

  • Oh great I am being blocked again...

  • hi 

  • I am getting a ton of hate mail at this point, can't believe it. Whats with all these cheesy names too.

  • Wait a miniute, just hold on.

  • Oh holy crap, just checked my email again. Good, one of you has contacted me. Don't be scared, I don't know who you are. No information was presented yet, crap. Umm. Email me again, can you leave your ID open, pinning you is essential at this point. Or if you are that scared, just hold on. I need to talk, hold on... Please!!!

  • I or wiki leaks, or Openleaks, or others will get your message out. If you need protection we can help. Leave your job, you need to contact me. ASAp

  • If one of you wants to whistle blow your job I can provide protection. Just send me a email with nothing attached. We will ping you and find out how this operation works. No false indirects please.

  • Whats with all the private hate mail. Just post it here on this site!

  • Look monday morning rolled around now, so its back to work. I understand, hey if you could only spare a whitle blower at this point. People would respect you more, Bradly Manning was a hero, even if he is being tortured at this point. He is a true new American hero. The more he is tortured, the more it shows how insecure this whole situation is.

  • Look isn't anyone going to step up to the plate here? Even if major news sites are now watching this Offical Nasa site, it doesn't mean you need to run away or pretend!

  • itrollthis, i love sweet sweet jesus. No need for him to suck anyones dick, kinda out of your charater isn't it? I mean, oh Jesus will burn you all.? I troll this? Couldn't you come up with a better name?

  • Oh come on guys, you are totally ignoring me now??? Look I am getting lonely, and bored now. I didn't mean to scare you guys away, I mean if you want to, you still can spit and send me hate emails if you want.

  • She's cute, at least for a scientist.

  • @ErnieCosmo CGI dude. computer generated images.

  • 118th comment.. was 117

  • @ErnieCosmo They are made by a computer using the facts and information they have about the planet

  • I love these guys... I want to do what they do

  • Hope humans will never find other planets, who knows what will heppen, we destroy our planet... we even bombed the moon... man, Humans are scary...

  • @D4rkallyet Your going with Pat, but I'd be nice! we'll leave you on the night side XD

  • Bah lies. Earth is the only planet out there! and is the center of the universe. Too many pagans. Jesus will burn you all.

  • @iTrollThis Jesus will suck your dick ;D Becouse he does not exist ^^

  • @iTrollThis hahaa lol why would Earth be the only one?

  • @iTrollThis HAHA Your funny!!!

  • Let's send Pat Robertson there, I'd pay for the trip!

  • This, in my opinion, is a Nobel Prize event. Nasa has done it again! Congratulations all around, and thank you for a job well done!

  • We will just have to wait and see who steps up to the plate now!

  • Its almost been three days now!

  • CAn't believe this, a offical Nasa site and I caught them with there pants down... This is now a major watched site, just waiting for them to screw up next. Come on boys, you got work to do... lol

    This is just the icing on the cake...

  • Well come on the guilty, try to defend this one. You need to expose yourselfs. Well anybody?  Oh right there gone for the weekend...

  • Wow, and you look back on old posts and they are cherry picking what comments they want removed. Just shamefull...

  • They have posted there 100 post so now they can take off for the weekend. Too much, come on. Erase this please, we now need evidence of more Nasa cover-ups.

  • Yup I am right, I have been posting for a couple days now and no one is responding. Only the guilty now will come around tomorrow and try to defend this. Can't believe this crap, spook Trollers monitoring this site. Another Nasa shame, Cant wait until they try to earse this, I have contacted at least ten major site now to watch whats up.

  • Hey, some of these profiles don't add up. What the hell is going on...

  • Oh man, I am just asking for trouble. These guys when they back from work are going to swear and spit all over me! ahhahahhaha

    You guys are found out! Oh and if my comments are removed, I have already taken copies of my comments here. This will be interesting!!!

  • I am going to get a some experts to view this site and check it out. These people can only post during mon-fri? Where are you guys on the weekend? Something is fishy about this site. I will be forwarding this site to other ot get there commments. I hope I am wrong but it looks like this site is monitored!

  • Hey, whats going on here. I am being blocked from posting? I have to use a re-directory site inorder to post now. Whats going on, I also am having trouble posting a complete Youtube URL? This is a offical nasa site and I am being blocked, what a bunch of crap. Hey people, I think this site is being patroled by offical nasa personal. Spookes maybe, actually I have no proof but something is really weird about this site. I think the two or three people constanly posting are up to something!!

  • I can put alot more up if you want to?

  • Here another one:

    ww.youtube.com/watch?v=JkIYpWt­pLs8

  • Here another one:

    youtube.com/watch?v=w3wGLC_sjT­Q

  • Here you go:

    youtube.com/watch?v=R6QNzH4x1r­Y&feature=related

  • hi

  • 100th like here.

  • lol ice job buddies were waiting

  • Good to see that you spend time with MIT talks. Having a fine arts backround, I have been spending alot of time watch TED talks. Not saying Nasa is not hard working. Does NASA lie, Yes. Do they air brush stuff out of there photos, Yes. These are just facts, not slander. My personal opinion is maybe slander but I hold a grudge when underhanded work is sported there. NASA is fraud? They just cover up too much stuff. Cover-Up. Thanks for the viewed personal attack, again. Hope your cat is ok.

  • @frontview1 Would you be specific to discribe, "stuff" concerning air brush?

  • I wonder if I am the only one thinking this "planet" is really the leftover core from a gas giant that got too close?

  • @1RadicalOne Kepler 10 has, as stated, a density of 8 grams per cubic centimeter. The left over core of a jovian (gas giant) planet would be of considerably higher density.

  • Even after the pressure is relieved?

  • @1RadicalOne Well, think about it. How much rebound would you say iron has? Very little.  You do pose a very interesting query. However, in the scientific method the simplist answer is usually the one that is most probable. Kepler 10 most probably formed like Mercury. Until such time that added data suggest otherwise, I will continue to embrace this standing. Yet, I will keep an open mind as I continue to watch results just so long as my brains don't fall out.

  • I was not aware the density of Mercury was that high. Yes, I know its iron core comprises nearly 70% of its volume, but a density of 8g/cc seemed to me far larger than anything we had ever seen terrestrially.

  • @1RadicalOne At the time of my last comment I was not attempting to compair the densities of Kepler 10 and Mercury. Only that K 10 probably formed as a terrestrial planet similar to Mercury. (I picked Mercury simply because it is closest to the sun and doesn't spin.) Again you raise an interesting point that supports your openning question. How is it that K 10 is so dense? Larger mass? Denser building material at formation? Heat from parent star caused molecular physical change of the iron?

  • Do we know that it is iron? The density was compared to that of iron, but it may in fact be something else.

    Or has it been measured (spectroscopically?)?

  • @1RadicalOne You're right. The above video does not specify iron. Nor have I found any other info' that determines K 10's compostion. Nickle would be my next guess, or perhaps a combo' of the two elements. And no, a spectrum analysis can only be obtained with the capture of light photons. The information so far obtain on the planet's mass, and hence density, was achieved by Doppler Effect formulas, and emperical deduction.

  • The density tells us little. There are minerals (as in rocks and their associated materials) that have that density, or close to it.

    Which is why I thought of a jovian core; made of something normally not dense - like silicates and carbon, that is, rock - but compressed due to the atmospheric pressure, and then the planet loses its atmosphere to solar wind.

    And rock DOES rebound; look at Greenland, rising hundreds of feet just because of the loss of ice sheets.

  • @1RadicalOne The inner core of jovian planets is thought to be heavy elements like iron, nickel, which are metals, not at all like the rocks (granite) of the continental crust here on earth which is less dense even than the heaver oceanographic plates comprised of basalts. The outer core of jovian planets are know to be made of metallic hydrogen. Thus too, it has been suggested that the inner core of Jupiter is made of compressed carbon(diamond) no elasticity (rebound) whatsoever.

  • @1RadicalOne Another point to consider also is the the raise of Greenland is not caused by the ion bonds of the atoms that make up the molecules of the rock to change to right angles thus making them less dense or rebound just because ice melts or moves off them. The rocks themselves don't rebound. It is the diminishing weight of the ice melting as the area of Greenland's lithosphere floats on top of the earth's mantel.

  • And now I retreat with my tail between my legs...

  • @1RadicalOne I found the density of iron: 7.874 grams per cc. Rounded off that number is eight. This must be why the video states K 10 is like an iron dumbbell.

  • @1RadicalOne For in depth knowledge of the Doppler Effect and how it is used to determine exoplanet data I highly recommend watching MIT Lec 23 8.0 Physics: Classical Mechanics here on youtube.

  • Leegrady1234

    You need to get your facts straight before attacking total stangers. All you have to do is put a few moments in some research. Try looking up air brushing, do you know what that is? Nasa employee's have made public statements requarding this subject. Is it so hard to believe your government would lie? Whats with attacking my video on my cat? Oh great, another Youtube bandit. Surprized you haven't started swearing at me yet.

  • @frontview1 "these people have been slowy exposed for what they really stand for, LIES." I consider that an insult to me personally.  Such slander only serves to further the enhancement of space exploration. After looking at your videos I viewed you as nothing more than a stoner who seeks to undermine good science and reality. Artist renditions of what we are limited to actually observing with our eyes qualifies the use of many mediums such as air-brush.

  • @frontview1 Furthermore I get many of my facts straght through MIT lectures available free here on youtube. I apologize for my attacks about your videos. ( I took my cat to the vet yesterday. Charle Boy is suffering from liver failure.) It just really gets me when I read again and again about govt. coverup stories from those who only seem to seek to undermine hard working (NASA) people with rummors, distrust and self-serving anti-social gossip. Do gov'ts lie? Yes. NASA a fraud? NO! Keepitreal.

  • @frontview1 Opps, error in my statement. What I ment to write is that: "Such slander only serves to poison the further enhancement of space exploration." My mistake.

  • Nasa has been a front for what is really going on with space exploration. Thanks to the web these people have been slowly exposed for what they really stand for, LIES. Its just a matter of time before wikileaks exposes these frauds for what they have done, for so many years. Leing, and disinformation. Thanks Nasa for all the airbrushing and basically holding back important information to the general public to what is really going on out there. Thanks to Garry Mckinnon, for keeping the truth!

  • @frontview1 Sounds like you're on the delta-9 thc space ship blue bong. How in thee world do you formulate validity for your comment? By what Garry Mckinnon says? It's easy to call someone or something, like NASA, a liar, but your source is nothing more than a hacker's 15 min. of fame. "In seven years" anti-gravity?! Do you even have any knowledge of General Realitivity? ( Hay, ooooooh, wow, your bat cat,s shadow has passed into the dark side.)..........

  • Can we not get better names for planets – Kepler 10b, not that imaginative

  • Comment removed

  • its amazing to me how they can determine the density of a planet thats not even visable with the naked eye...

  • @1itemDbow ill be impressed when we reach alpha centaury

  • interesting sure but why search for these objects in the first place ?

    curiosity i get but is there another reason ?

  • just figuring others will be curious here too: 0.01684 AU from its star according to wiki.

  • animated new planet  LOL

  • Awesome!

  • Hooray for Kepler!

  • it would be interesting to see a dollar break down on resource extraction there and what kinds of technologies could be employed.

  • 1.4 times the size of earth. probably about 4 gs. I wonder how long its day is? It would be interesting if the day is say 38 earth days. It would be even better if the planet had one side facing its sun at all times. The rotation of the magnetosphere's phase could be a major energy source. Also since one side is continually molten a lot less energy would be needed for extraction. At a density of 8. What would you want to bet there are alot more transuranics and complex atomic isotopes for fuel?

  • whts kepler

  • Awesome news. Looking forward to more Kepler updates.

  • What you mean by first? WHat about the exoplanets orbiting Gliese 581. Thats my favorite system yet.

  • @Kaylanthedj they are not sure if any of them are rocky..

  • @T1av1s At least astrologists are 75-25 percent sure Gliese 581 c is a water world.

  • @Kaylanthedj or that Gliese 581g is in the habitable zone for life. But they are not 100% sure though.

  • @Kaylanthedj Astrologists or Astronomers?

  • @cosmicbimbo either one that studies exoplanets

  • @Kaylanthedj that'll be astromomers then, astrologists are confused enough as it is!

  • @Kaylanthedj That would be Astonomers.

  • It might not be in the habitable zone, but it's a significant mile stone from where we first were. Most planets being discovered are Jovians

  • 1,800 degrees kelvin or 1,526.85 degrees celsius (2,780.33 degrees fahrenheit) ...Hm still have to use there a lots of air-conditioning

  • W-A-M!!!! Somebody better answer me this question right now cuz im about ta puke! IF THE UNIVERSE IS 14B LY WIDE, AND THE MILKY WAY IS 100K LY ACROSS, THAT MEANS THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE IS ONLY 140,000 TIMES WIDER THAN OUR GALAXY?!!! HOW CAN THAT BE?!!

  • Not in the habitable zone!! boooooring... Can this damn thing not detect things further out from a star? Can it detect an earth like planet orbiting another star or not?

  • lets move on to the other planets that might support life, i am all for scientific exploration of these types of planets but after 40 years in space it would be nice to find somewhere out there like earth. love Nasa though, you guys rock!!!

  • I would like to hear some day: "Yes we found planet like earth with oceans and probably life on it". I think that would be one of best days for anyone.

  • when I get out of highschool and go to college im going to get my degree in astronomy and physics and try to apply for a job at nasa :)

  • @CrAzYHaLo156 good luck!! and remember, failer is not an option!!!!

  • @andrewc247 thanks :) and so true

  • So it's like a big mercury then.

  • Huzzah! So exciting! 

  • I love the space!

  • Good guys, continue searching, everybody is waiting for the Big News

  • One day we be watching, "Kepler has discovered an earth like planet with liquid water on it." man what a day would that be.

  • Too bad this find wasn't the holy grail, but since it is WAY tougher to spot planets close to a star, this is a very good sign of the capabilities of modern planethunting.

    They have a super-Mercury down, now they need to find something closer to Earth.

    but really, 8.8g/cm3? That is damn dense for a rocky planet. Mercury is 5.5g/cm3. And almost half of Mercury's volume is IRON.

  • @Tounushi It's actually harder to spot planets farther away from the planet. They pull it less gravitationally and block less of it's light.

  • Congratulations to the discovery

  • A year in less then 2 days. Tax time every morning. lol

  • We know one thing about it. It's hollow...as are all space spheres.

  • @hypnofan35: If you know it, you must have taken seismographic readings of any celestial body of the universe. Did you?

  • @Komodo1987 This is something that must be puzzled. Gravity is different than most forces: It only pulls, but it pulls much harder on that which is closer.  When the surface web of mass/gravity force matches the vertical force surface forces; it finds its configuration. and stabilizes somewhat. You could find the distance to inner surface Earth by extrapolating the force decrease to the zero sum zone, and hence the inside surface that has similar Gforce to outer surface. Needs a deep well.

  • @hypnofan35: No, that is not something that must be puzzled. You are claming to know that every celestial body is hollow, but you cannot know that without having measured every celestial body that exists.

  • @Komodo1987 It is because gravity sums directionally and prevails in directional strength on the inner and outer surfaces but in opposite directions. The sideways gravity is similar or the same in strength as the vertical sums. There is no directional pull at the center of the greater mass, and there is a null Gforce zone or level between the inner and outer surfaces. I mentioned how to figure how far these point are. When something is banned from common knowledge it must be done hierarachally

  • @hypnofan35: Your hypothesis is irrelevant. Even if it were true and planets usually were hollow, your claim to know that every celestial body and Kepler-10b in perticular were would be wrong.

  • @Komodo1987 You sounds as if you are hierarchally influenced. My conclusion on this was actually a surprise for me as well. It's not easy to think in terms of symmetry and gravity. i used to try when i was younger. Mostly i was just thinking in gravity field terms, how it sums. If you can imagine being at a zero sum point in a sideways sense, that's part of seeing it. It's like a net or like a "surface tension" kind of phenom. It's laterally balanced on the surfaces.

  • @hypnofan35: I understand you just fine. You are just plain wrong in your thought and data.

  • @Komodo1987 i won't ask you to lay down your reasoning. i will accept that thought and data thing.

  • @Komodo1987 It's actually pretty simplistic to figure out. i'm pretty sure it must be an official secret and banned from "common knowledge".

  • @hypnofan35 Why are they keeping the hollow spheres a secret?

  • @ross259 You have to kind of ask yourself why is anything kept a secret? It would probably mean that there is an inner world on/in Earth. i don't know what it looks like, It's somewhat smaller than the outside surface. It probably has continents and it could well be that inner and outer oceans are connected. Inside gravity would be the same or nearly the same. That's just guessing, otherwise i would not know. We could be having planetary engineering happening.

  • @ross259 In terms of conceptual hierarchal dynamics, if you ever wondered what those guys think about when they are figuring out what information to block. It is like a child building dams or trenches logically. There's some strange stuff going on these days and it doesn't seem to be explainable by competive classism, because it's too looney toons. It's almost as if there is a conceptual occupation. That's paranoia for you.

  • @hypnofan35 Has it occured to you that maybe it's you who is "looney toons"?

  • @ArchNME You haven't given it a second's thought... have you? To you it is kind of a game of words and names. Why do you resist the concept of hollow space orbs? Is there a special reason. It seems like the most logical thing to me. I know it would be a big deal. Why would mass pull toward a point of zero gravity when their is more gravity pulling in the other direction? It's a complex conceptual problem. Ask someone at NASA or maybe a physics prof. or just think about it a second.

  • @hypnofan35 I thought about it for a second and it turns out planets are spheres. Imagine yourself in the center of this hollow sphere, you would be surrounded by mass on all sides, which would be attracted to each other by gravity right. One side of this hollow sphere would be attracted to the other thus crushing in on you and guess what, no more hollow sphere! Now STFU or go dig a hole till you prove me wrong.

  • @ArchNME You can't anger it though, you have to think it through. You are trying to make it into word play when it is not. It is the unique case of gravitation physics at a self configuring scale. You can't just smack at it and be correct What about (let's say; where do UFO's come from?) Let's say; what is the next most likely place for life to exist in the Solar system after outer surface Earth? No one can prove a believer wrong. Just ask the inquisitors.

  • @hypnofan35 You're insane. Start digging.

  • @hypnofan35 you talk so much bull with this "hollow sphere" crap. 

  • @DrLeaInTheTardis i think your analysis is pretty short, negative, and consummately meaningless. i don't need any further bias toward mindlessness responses.

  • Always get a chill up my spine seeing a glimpse of a new world.

  • Very interesting to hear about other rocky planets rather than gas giants. Needs a better name though. ;-)

  • Well that's a good start to the year twenty-tenty-one

  • too hot for live !

  • What a brilliant discovery! I hope to be on the frontier of science, like these people are, when I'm older (:

  • great!

    almost forgot about kepler...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more