Even though this game looks like it's been hit with an ugly stick, I can't get enough of it. It's so... addicting, even if it does look and sound like crap. Hey, it's still Pac-Man.
If the Atari could only handle 2 or 3 moving sprites,than how in gott's name can games like Donkey Kong,Mario Bros,and Defender work with no flickering whatsoever?
Random fact:This is actually an early prototype of the game kicked out of the nest to get out in time for Christmas.That's why the ghosts blink,or in some versions,dissapear entirley.
americans like to eat, dunno about the running bit. The arcade version had dots, not dashes, what a crappy looking port, someone should have been shot for this.
@itachi705 haha, that's a good point. but i know what the author meant. he meant "eat and run" as in having a quick lunch and getting back to work/class. that we DO do a lot of...even today.
In 1985, I could play this version of Pac-Man over and over without losing a single man. I flipped it every time at 100,000. I could show anyone how to do it, too. :) It's a pretty easy game to flip, too. But, I loved it. The same day I flipped this version in 1985, my friend flipped Missle Command on the same console.
nufcdazzla, you only think it is bad, because you are only 23 years old. You don't realize how much sensational fun this version of Pac-man actually caused in the world. Graphics weren't like they are today. We didn't have Direct X 10 and anti-aliasing. None of that stuff. You must realize that for us, this was like X-Box 360. You just weren't alive back then. :)
It could have been better, but considering the technology, not by much. Lots of folks were disappointed with the home version at the time too. As a 6 year old, I didn't mind a bit. The biggest problem with this game was that investors predicted Pac-man alone would net $250 million in sales (almost 8 times Atari's total annual sales at that point) which is one factor that lead the company to irresponsible spending and later bankruptcy.
I love the way he's forced to change pac-man terminology. They're not dots anymore, oh no. now there dashes that pac-man eats lol! no fruits either. It's a vitamin he eats now lol!
What's even more insulting is a year later the 2600 released a Mrs Pac-man port that was halfway decent. Mrs Pacman actually turned corners. Obviously a year later they had more time and learned how to trick the 2600 hardware into making a decent port.
He could have at least mentioned it's one of the worst Arcade ports in history and crushed the dreams of millions of children in 1982. Instead he acts like the game is just like the Arcade.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
While the graphics were better, the game engine on the arcade version of pac-man was seriously broken. The ghost movement wasn't random- they moved consistently and proportionately according to how you moved pac-man. hat made it possible to win every time by using the exact same movement pattern. The Atari version randomized the ghost movement.
That didn't seem to matter once you reached the maximum difficulty/speed level on the Atari version. From that point onward you could infinitely use the same pattern to win each "stage".
I seem to remember that the score did not flip at max, but just stayed at 99999...But that was over 20 years ago...I could be wrong. And I never touched the game again, after I knew how to "beat it".
When I played Atari PacMan, I must have been about five or six. I found it to be the most frustrating as hell game to play. Now I play it, and it's not frustrating, but it's nothing compared to the arcade version.
This game was truely terrible. I played it when i was little and remember being so jealous of my best mate who had a BBC B computer and had the equivalent game called snapper. Boy did he take the piss out of me.. Took me ages to save up for BBC B, Happy days...
That Pac-Man was horrible. And look at the scoreboard. 1 point per dash, 5 for a power pellet, and 20 for the first ghost. It should have been 10, 50, and 200. And look at the fruit. It's just a square box.
I remember waiting for this game to be released .. and when we were driving home from Sears I was praying to god that we wouldn't die in a car wreck. What a silly kid.. haha .. I played it for a long time and developed a pattern that I could use on any level. I remember I played one game for what seemed like hours and I just decided to turn it off .. it doesn't get much harder. The 5200 version was better, but the analogue joysticks kill it.
One of the 2600's poorest efforts, as demonstrated by the substantial improvements in Ms. Pac-Man. To think they could have likewise released a better Pac-Man at that time...
I also remember this awful game when I was little. The horrible graphics gave me nightmares. Then I discovered the wonders which was the NES. Graphics DO matter.
Well, it was all we had for conversions back in the 80's for the 2600. Despite how "aweful" the game was, it sold alot of units (and didn't end up in a landfill, like E.T. did). It's more fun now than it was then. lol
The version for the 5200 was basically the 400/800 version with some animated scenes between levels; and yeah, it was actually a very good conversion.
They later ported the enhanced 5200 version back to the 400/800. Basically, the 5200 *was* just an Atari 800 minus keyboard, but they changed the cart socket and external ports, made a couple of very minor changes to the OS. Stupid, contrived incompatibility.
This was the biggest disapointment of the 2600 era. Terrible game. No variation, bad sound effects, no parity with the arcade... just shite. Ms. Pac was an improvement.
That game is proof that no good can come from greed. Atari didn't want to split profits with Namco, who created this game, so they made a pale imitation.
The reason it was so bad is not because of a desire to hog the full profits, or due to the limitations of the 2600. It was actually because of the fact that the game was rushed to market for the Christmas season. Apparently, programmer Tod Frye showed Atari a rough version of the game, and they simply chose to release that version instead of lose out on the potential Christmas sales.
Not true. Search for "Hack 'Em", someone made an all new 2600 version of Pac Man a couple years ago that is vastly superior and very faithful to the original, even with the graphical limitations.
what kind of crack was this guy smoking.
youwayo 1 month ago
"The next board sets up automatically..."
.... then it takes like three or so seconds. XD
sonic8005 4 months ago
i want even born yet
mikeberserkr 5 months ago in playlist Retro Gaming
At least the 2600 version of Ms Pacman wasn't too bad
genesislordofdarknes 11 months ago
jaysus look at dem ghosts flicker
drkraid 1 year ago
Wow the version for 5200 was so much better.
jcgamer107 1 year ago
NOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
DirtMcGurt024 1 year ago
The next level starts automatically? Oh good! I hate those games where you have to manually start each level!
DrSuperMarioMan6464 1 year ago 4
This is how video games started in the late 70s!
Rudyfourth 1 year ago
lol now I wanna dig my 2600 outta my cloaset and play sum Pac Man
abcpat100 1 year ago
you can make a shitty game look awsome!
TorpedoBill9 1 year ago
Even though this game looks like it's been hit with an ugly stick, I can't get enough of it. It's so... addicting, even if it does look and sound like crap. Hey, it's still Pac-Man.
Bittergamer1886 1 year ago 4
unespecting that the pac-man dont turn up and down :(
eVITORIOe 1 year ago
im suprised the ghost's didnt like go crazy everywhere around the screen
ineedmoney231 1 year ago
Good game if not for one problem: YOU CAN'T SEE THE GHOSTS HALF THE TIME
snakes3425 2 years ago
pacman is the allegory for the american life
LordDumal 2 years ago
People, he's said BEST SELLING GAME, not BEST GAME!
electricmastro 2 years ago
And the guy who made it did not like pac-man.
That would be like someone asking me to supervise the making of a Guitar Hero game: it would be so changed all the fans would hate it, haha.
kurisux 2 years ago
where the fuck do you get your sources
BeckTheBen 1 year ago
@BeckTheBen People connected to the old Atari corp, in some way, mostly. I could be totally wrong, but I go with the best sources of info I have.
As for sites in question, atariage has quite a few ex-game devs from those days on it. Nuff said I think.
Again, I could be totally wrong, but that would mean those coders are lying out their ass, and I kinda doubt that.
kurisux 1 year ago
HAHA it is am American phenomenon because we like to eat and run so much... well, except for the running of course.
lol
baggedyman 2 years ago 34
@baggedyman A Winner is You my friend
PikaChamp112 1 year ago
Pac Man is the the most popular game in the United States.
jediskunk67 2 years ago 6
This game's graphics are waaaaaay less than the arcade version, but the gameplay was quite fun overall.
adog262 2 years ago
What do they mean "one of the best-selling games"? Pac-man for the Atari 2600 was Atari's 2nd WORST selling game, behind E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial!
lemonlad7 2 years ago
lol wikipedia
owensed01 2 years ago
well it was a failed game but sold incredibly well i have nothing against it
it was pac man and well i seeee nothing wrong
owensed01 2 years ago
i hated this game i dont know why but dont like this game it bores me
WiNsToN1956 2 years ago
If the Atari could only handle 2 or 3 moving sprites,than how in gott's name can games like Donkey Kong,Mario Bros,and Defender work with no flickering whatsoever?
Anony1200 2 years ago
Random fact:This is actually an early prototype of the game kicked out of the nest to get out in time for Christmas.That's why the ghosts blink,or in some versions,dissapear entirley.
But the sounds are shameful,even for the 2600...
Anony1200 3 years ago
true dat but when i first played it i saw nothing wrong with it
owensed01 2 years ago
The graphics for pacman have gotten WAY better between the Atari 2600 and the Atari 5200
WobDawg509 3 years ago
wow the perfect arcade port
when i first saw footage i was like "this must be a mistake"
ZacharyDuhamel 3 years ago
POWER PILL?
clinch44 3 years ago
@clinch44
Those big dot things that turn ghosts blue when you eat them.
Blahguy300 1 year ago
BONK BONK BONK BONK BONK!!! ....... Just like the arcade right?
Quinn5151 3 years ago
The name is the selling point. The actual game: dogshit.
DONK DONK DONKDONK BOOP. This is awful sound effects even for the 2600.
wildsmiley 3 years ago
It was one of the best sellers because it was a scam for all gamers with half a brain.
gocrazed1 3 years ago 2
eat yes run not so much
trystan877 3 years ago
I wish this show came on G4 rewind or whatever it's called...
HoboBob24 3 years ago
That was an awful port and they knew it! They just knew if they put pac man in the home into actuality they'd hit the jackpot. Dumb assholes.
wiifan135 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I know, but i have it for my 2600, and it is a good game to play, regardless of its faith to the arcade version.
gamer64uk 3 years ago
americans like to eat, dunno about the running bit. The arcade version had dots, not dashes, what a crappy looking port, someone should have been shot for this.
hardgayramen4ever 3 years ago 4
No, it was a good game. It was released on the 2600 about 25 years ago! Of course it wasn't going to look good, but man, it was a great game.
gamer64uk 3 years ago
no, but this was not a good port, it even got heavily criticised back when it originally came out.
hardgayramen4ever 3 years ago 8
....Am I not the only person who thinks this port is shit? Wow. Cool. I guess I don't have a very high standard for the Atari...
TenguGuy 3 years ago
that game was shitty piss poor
clinch44 3 years ago
Yeah, after a while I figured that out. =P
TenguGuy 3 years ago
Play the 5200 or 7800 version.
HoboBob24 3 years ago 3
i had this game on atari and HATED eveything about it even at the time.. it doesn't feel like pacman at all
kbrinks 3 years ago 15
Ugh they replace waaka waaka with baamp baamp.
Thebboss 3 years ago 5
"Pehaps because we Americans love to eat and run so much."
LOL! Eat, yeah. Run, no.
itachi705 3 years ago 4
@itachi705 haha, that's a good point. but i know what the author meant. he meant "eat and run" as in having a quick lunch and getting back to work/class. that we DO do a lot of...even today.
ocfernan 2 years ago
omg i can finally see what the guy looks like. I remember a How To Beat Home Video Games video of ET that was uploaded here.
themangodess 3 years ago
In 1985, I could play this version of Pac-Man over and over without losing a single man. I flipped it every time at 100,000. I could show anyone how to do it, too. :) It's a pretty easy game to flip, too. But, I loved it. The same day I flipped this version in 1985, my friend flipped Missle Command on the same console.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
this is no doubt an ACTUALLY DIFFERENT
pac-man! That actually has originality.
NixonTech2071 3 years ago
my dad has tht game!! the intro sound is kinda wierd.
Talic3 4 years ago
lol i do like to eat and rune thats why i have this game! it freakin rockz!
Onono6 4 years ago
I LOVE THE GAME! Only Down Side is the ghost flash :( BUT outher then That THIS GAME ROX!!
D2Krazy 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ketchietl 4 years ago
pretty cool
Onono6 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This game is a crock of shit, even for ATARI 2600 standards, freakin awful
nufcdazzla 4 years ago
nufcdazzla, you only think it is bad, because you are only 23 years old. You don't realize how much sensational fun this version of Pac-man actually caused in the world. Graphics weren't like they are today. We didn't have Direct X 10 and anti-aliasing. None of that stuff. You must realize that for us, this was like X-Box 360. You just weren't alive back then. :)
blicksflicks 3 years ago
i could play this indefinatly on 1 game. notice u get 1 point per dot. i would play to 100k and it would go back to zero. then turn it off.
drunkdaddyo69x 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The adaptation of Pac-Man for Atari 2600 is the WORSE videogame ever!
Suck!
Drakul777 4 years ago
It could have been better, but considering the technology, not by much. Lots of folks were disappointed with the home version at the time too. As a 6 year old, I didn't mind a bit. The biggest problem with this game was that investors predicted Pac-man alone would net $250 million in sales (almost 8 times Atari's total annual sales at that point) which is one factor that lead the company to irresponsible spending and later bankruptcy.
balletman 4 years ago
ET and action 52 is waaaaaay worse than this
crazynintendoguy 4 years ago 7
I love the way he's forced to change pac-man terminology. They're not dots anymore, oh no. now there dashes that pac-man eats lol! no fruits either. It's a vitamin he eats now lol!
Orionsaint 4 years ago
What's even more insulting is a year later the 2600 released a Mrs Pac-man port that was halfway decent. Mrs Pacman actually turned corners. Obviously a year later they had more time and learned how to trick the 2600 hardware into making a decent port.
Orionsaint 4 years ago
He could have at least mentioned it's one of the worst Arcade ports in history and crushed the dreams of millions of children in 1982. Instead he acts like the game is just like the Arcade.
Orionsaint 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
While the graphics were better, the game engine on the arcade version of pac-man was seriously broken. The ghost movement wasn't random- they moved consistently and proportionately according to how you moved pac-man. hat made it possible to win every time by using the exact same movement pattern. The Atari version randomized the ghost movement.
balletman 4 years ago
That didn't seem to matter once you reached the maximum difficulty/speed level on the Atari version. From that point onward you could infinitely use the same pattern to win each "stage".
I seem to remember that the score did not flip at max, but just stayed at 99999...But that was over 20 years ago...I could be wrong. And I never touched the game again, after I knew how to "beat it".
Kijinn 3 years ago
Demons To Damonds was the best!
lkmetal1977 4 years ago
lol we do like to eat and run!
speedy790 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guys a fag
link458745 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck u!!
lacorunya 4 years ago
ezyrewards(dot)com/?id=181810
Goldbanjo14 4 years ago
When I played Atari PacMan, I must have been about five or six. I found it to be the most frustrating as hell game to play. Now I play it, and it's not frustrating, but it's nothing compared to the arcade version.
-MINESWEEP
MINESWEEP2k 4 years ago
I have this game on my Atari 2600. I'm still playing with it...great time!!
0597534 4 years ago
That's true many times when you are watching a T.V. show and they are playing a video game you here sound effects from this game.
connor938 4 years ago
This game was truely terrible. I played it when i was little and remember being so jealous of my best mate who had a BBC B computer and had the equivalent game called snapper. Boy did he take the piss out of me.. Took me ages to save up for BBC B, Happy days...
georgegay4 4 years ago
i think this game has the most overused sounds for generic video game scenes in movies/tv. i love em
nttbeats 4 years ago
That Pac-Man was horrible. And look at the scoreboard. 1 point per dash, 5 for a power pellet, and 20 for the first ghost. It should have been 10, 50, and 200. And look at the fruit. It's just a square box.
mrwoods123 4 years ago
That game looks like shite.
dogeymon83 4 years ago
the first few seconds of this vid is hilarious
laesperanzapaz 4 years ago
yeah, the announcer seems so happy to bring everyone a "biggie" to that show.....how polite, how formal lol
lacorunya 4 years ago
There was a pattern to this game (after a certain point when the ghost got faster). Just did the same pattern over and over again.
pgc4sean 4 years ago
wait... did he say best selling? this was the game that triggered the video game crash!
pimanrules 4 years ago
No! That game was named E.T.
legend813 4 years ago
Both helped trigger it.
pimanrules 4 years ago
@pimanrules , it did, because so many people returned it afterwards.
ocfernan 2 years ago
shit! i was maybe 6 years old
papo112 4 years ago
monsterbox, I think you got your words confused. It is SIMPLE not EASY.
chespirito427 4 years ago
I remember waiting for this game to be released .. and when we were driving home from Sears I was praying to god that we wouldn't die in a car wreck. What a silly kid.. haha .. I played it for a long time and developed a pattern that I could use on any level. I remember I played one game for what seemed like hours and I just decided to turn it off .. it doesn't get much harder. The 5200 version was better, but the analogue joysticks kill it.
redmartian 4 years ago
One of the 2600's poorest efforts, as demonstrated by the substantial improvements in Ms. Pac-Man. To think they could have likewise released a better Pac-Man at that time...
jestearns 4 years ago
wow classic pac-man
pf91rodman 4 years ago
Yeah... eat and run! ;-)
Topper2001 4 years ago
I also remember this awful game when I was little. The horrible graphics gave me nightmares. Then I discovered the wonders which was the NES. Graphics DO matter.
Death1121 4 years ago
i never knew tat sum1 would actuly release a walkthrough type thing for the easyiest game in the world
monsterbox4 4 years ago
Well, it was all we had for conversions back in the 80's for the 2600. Despite how "aweful" the game was, it sold alot of units (and didn't end up in a landfill, like E.T. did). It's more fun now than it was then. lol
polaris1966 4 years ago
UGH! I played this game when I was little, and boy did it SUCK!
MavsFan1982 4 years ago
Terrible Game, this video never should have existed.
Carlitonsp 4 years ago
that is the ugliest game i have ever seen in my whole life
lifelesslink 4 years ago
yuck... I never played that version of that game but it makes me want to wash myself
Panpizza15 4 years ago
this was the first video game i ever played in my life. must have been 5 years old...thanks for the post!
jdmikeg4 5 years ago
i had this game on 2600 VCS Atari.
And i knew also the technics.
But what about Starmaster?
DGSE 5 years ago
terrible port. Dashes? they're supposed to be dots, where's the fruit? why do the ghosts flicker so much? lame
hardgayramen4ever 5 years ago
my mom loved this game. terrible maze though. i imagine i'd get tired going around each one of those squares over and over...
ronaldsf 5 years ago
LOL..I remember this. I thought the Atari 5200's Pac Man was far better.
intenselan 5 years ago
The version for the 5200 was basically the 400/800 version with some animated scenes between levels; and yeah, it was actually a very good conversion.
They later ported the enhanced 5200 version back to the 400/800. Basically, the 5200 *was* just an Atari 800 minus keyboard, but they changed the cart socket and external ports, made a couple of very minor changes to the OS. Stupid, contrived incompatibility.
NotATube 4 years ago
This was the biggest disapointment of the 2600 era. Terrible game. No variation, bad sound effects, no parity with the arcade... just shite. Ms. Pac was an improvement.
jackbox1971 5 years ago
very od americans
dskandman 5 years ago
This is before pac patterns. Pac patterns applied to the arcade version of pacman, which was a lot lore polished than this.
russdamac 5 years ago
That game is proof that no good can come from greed. Atari didn't want to split profits with Namco, who created this game, so they made a pale imitation.
NinjaGhostScorpion 5 years ago
if that was the case, it wouldnt be called pac-man! the reason it's "bad" is due to the limitations of the 2600.
queensplazasouth 4 years ago
The reason it was so bad is not because of a desire to hog the full profits, or due to the limitations of the 2600. It was actually because of the fact that the game was rushed to market for the Christmas season. Apparently, programmer Tod Frye showed Atari a rough version of the game, and they simply chose to release that version instead of lose out on the potential Christmas sales.
TServo2049 4 years ago 2
Not true. Search for "Hack 'Em", someone made an all new 2600 version of Pac Man a couple years ago that is vastly superior and very faithful to the original, even with the graphical limitations.
jakeharvey 4 years ago 2
I'm going to look that up. Interesting, if true.
balletman 4 years ago
really? i thought bally-midway owned pac man at the time.
ocfernan 2 years ago
We like to eat and run lol
buzzbuzz312 5 years ago
One out of two ain't bad ;-)
NotATube 5 years ago
lol.
THEWWE2K7 5 years ago
Atari 2600 handheld running Ms. Pac-Man, Mr. Do!, Defender, ET, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdg5fV_8w6U
amiga2000 5 years ago
This guy sucks at video games
kramerthebird 5 years ago
this game is beatable?
Msdos4 5 years ago
he didnt know the pattern I guess you could do the same pattern over and over and never die.
commedore64 5 years ago
bizarre
phantomdj 5 years ago