Rd 8: SH wins clearly. Lands narrowly more & better blows, and is the aggressor and ring general throughout.
Rd 9: OG rd, clearly. Lands more and better clean punches, & while SH was coming forward, he wasn't cutting ring or throwing punches, just walking into them.
Rd 10: Close rd. OG nicks it, b/c clean effective punches are even and OG was effective aggressor. SH walked fwd but OG initiated all the punching and controlled distance.
OG 96-93, but betw 96-93 SH and 97-92 OG is ok w/me.
@rezz3r Oh well if the camera guy says it, it must be true. Honestly the fact that you only gave Griffin 2 rounds (including giving the other guy a rd Griffin was winning even w/o a knockdown), and that the rounds you chose to give him were a close round (5) and a clear Hawk round (8) tells me you have no idea what you're supposed to be looking for in scoring a fight.
Rd 8: SH wins clearly. Lands narrowly more & better blows, and is the aggressor and ring general throughout.
Rd 9: OG rd, clearly. Lands more and better clean punches, & while SH was coming forward, he wasn't cutting ring or throwing punches, just walking into them.
Rd 10: Close rd. OG nicks it, b/c clean effective punches are even and OG was effective aggressor. SH walked fwd but OG initiated all the punching and controlled distance.
OG 96-93, but betw 96-93 SH and 97-92 OG is ok w/me.
cowboydan76 2 months ago
I give griffin rounds 5 an 8... the camera guy even says it was a slip after the seventh round.... but hawk wins 8rds to 2 rds...
rezz3r 3 months ago
@rezz3r Oh well if the camera guy says it, it must be true. Honestly the fact that you only gave Griffin 2 rounds (including giving the other guy a rd Griffin was winning even w/o a knockdown), and that the rounds you chose to give him were a close round (5) and a clear Hawk round (8) tells me you have no idea what you're supposed to be looking for in scoring a fight.
cowboydan76 2 months ago