Added: 2 years ago
From: auto123
Views: 42,872
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (69)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm glad I didn't get this car cause my 370Z is so much better =)

  • RIP best car made by mitsubishi :(

  • i was kinda disappointed when i rented one in florida. i have an 03 gts but wanted to see the difference between the two and it feels about the same. the 265 hp is masked by all the extra weight so it felt no faster. only difference was alot of creature comforts. but if you want one its cool but for me i find no reason to make a new car payment if it feels the same as my current eclipse

  • Heard this car was a pain in the ass. You have to take the entire intake manifold off just to change the spark plugs -_- A bunch of other little things too. Mitsubishi made this car to annoy people who'd buy it. Also this car seems girly, specially the spyder. I'd rather just get a WRX if I were to buy an import. The new ones are amazing, and the new STI is faster than the evo.

  • @vboytan yeah these new eclipses are as girly as hell. the old eclipse had the same engine as the evo, it had awd, it didnt look girly

  • @Sasori327 Like around what year did the eclipse run the evo engine and which evo engine did they use?

  • @vboytan on the 1990 - 1999 models, but only on the gsx and gst

  • The big spoiler and dual exhaust don't suit the Eclipse....

  • i wanted a review....what i got was a middle aged man reading me the spec sheet...

  • @mlncars777 exactly 

  • dope ride.

  • My roommate has this car.

  • whats one of these babies cost ?

  • Its front wheel drive.

  • the back looks like a Porsche

  • It looks nice but thats all you pay for this car.

  • 2009 eclipse Is awesome I love my whip

  • is the eclipse a rear wheeler or 4wd?

  • @dorifto711 fwd lol

  • @fuzzybumkin and FWD is for the feable lol

  • looks kinda like a R35 GTR (grill) mix with Jag XK (lights)

  • I LOVE HOW PEOPLE COMPARE THIS TO THE 370Z! The Z IS a NEW GEN! This eclipse is from 2006 and about to change. I Dare you to compare the ugly ass Z to something called CONCEPT RA. Which could be the next Eclipse. You can't, because the Z does not even compare to the technology in it. Which is the same technology on the Evo. Turbo charged, super all wheel drive, Light weight, TC SST Transmittion.

  • The eclipse sucks!

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 lol, its worth far more than you are

  • @Cloudstrife1188 well at least i am glad im worth something, but you are not even worth a penny...hahaha

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 When i drive my 06GT im worth whatever its worth. 28 grand or some crap like that

  • @Cloudstrife1188 well i am sorry to tell you that you wasted your 28 grand on that crap....

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 How did i waste it again? I can KILL any other car in its price. Its more stylish than a Z. And when the new one comes out i'll just trade it in. Resale value is at 18-20 grand.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 oh so now you are telling me that you can kill a camaro,mustang,genesis coupe even a mazdaspeed 3? hahaha yeah right..... looks can be deceiving.....

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 Um yes? Firstly, the mustang GT is not in this price range. And that is why we have something called an EVO. Which can put every single car you mentioned to shame. The camaro is RECENTLY NEW, not since 2005 like this baby right here. The mazdaspeed 3 does not stand a chance against this car. I've raced a couple. Even on paper dude. 5.9 sec 0-8 and this car can do it in 5.4. Sooo you were saying? Genesis coupe is ALSO recently new.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 First of all we are talking about the Eclipse, not the evo. Second of all all the cars i mention to you are faster to 60 pmh than your eclipse, Mustang v6 5.1 seconds, Camaro 5.4 seconds, genesis coupe 5.3 seconds and mazdaspeed 3 5.5 seconds. For your information the eclipse time is 5.8 seconds. And finally the prices, the mustang and camaro starts at 23k, the mazdasspeed 3 at 24k and the genesis coupe v6 at 26k......so even the new genesis coupe rape your eclipse, trust me.

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 This car was supposed to be changed this year. But it wasnt, because their sales are picking up so they decided to leave it for another year. Have you looked at the Concept RA? If your gonna compare anything to this car in its PRICE RANGE. Go back to when the car was released. Dont pull something that JUST came out on the market.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 so you were saying that your eclipse is more stylish than a Z......well thats about it, because performance talking the Z kills your eclipse......

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 I'l give you some contenders. Rx8, slower and more expensive. 305z 2004 release, Slower in slalom, slower around the track, faster but only because of a 45HP+ output. AND more expensive. Give me a car from 2005 in this price range that was better, faster. Wont find one

  • @Cloudstrife1188 you said you had a 06 eclipse.....not an 05....now im starting to think you dont have an eclipse, by the the way the mazdaspeed 3 came out in 06 and yes it's faster and 4k less than you eclipse, if you have one...

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 lol dudem, the car came out in 05. Its an 06 version. Its not faster. where do you get those facts? I have proof from paper and experience. The eclipse throws its HP and Torque faster than the 3 speed and does its 0-60 in less time. Quarter mile is faster too. Its handeling is better and stopping power. Do some research man. And its 4K cheaper because it doesent have the same features such as the 650 watt system, heated leather seats. Backup camera.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 The mazdaspeed time was 5.5 seconds to 60 miles per hour, you eclipse is 5.8.....dude just read some reviews of your car, you can go to motor trend, car & driver, any magazine and they all agree this car sucks. There are better and faster cars than this in that price range. You said is more stylish right? well it might be, but for that you get a heavy car with a awful v6 engine.....maybe the next generation will be better, lighter and faster, but also more expensive..

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 lol and show me where youve seen the 3 speed do 5.5 O.o everywhere i look it says the least is 5.8 - 6.2. Eclipse GT on the other hand is 5.4 - 6.1 which is hence why i said its hard to put the power down. But when you do, you easily get that 5.4 Wider tires and better grip gives you a better time. the 3 speed is 3000 pounds and has the same power, even more torque. 600 pounds LESS! and still slower. Would never consider it a sports car.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 dude motor trend reach 60 miles in 5.5 seconds. They also tested a eclipse and tooke them 5.8 seconds......dude be realistic for 25k you get a mazdaspeed 3 with performace and good options, a stero with 10 speakers, gps navigation and all that... the eclipse is just more expensive and it doesn't deliver better performance....

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 lol you saw a 3G eclipse. Not a 4G. And tell me. Where did you see a GTR for 70K? Because i'd LOVE to buy it at that price. I own an 06GT buddy. Black, EBC Brakes, ripp mods supercharger. Your wrong dude, the 3 speed is not capable of beating the eclipse. And its 600 pounds lighter.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 yeah it was a 4g not a 3g..... and yeah you can buy a GTR for 78k.....

    well i still would like to see a eclipse beat all the cars you mention....

  • @Cloudstrife1188 dude i just made a research and i found a GTR for 73k.....

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 I'm talking about every optional feature included in my GT. I dont have the backup camera it wasnt included at the time.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 and if it gets more expensive and surpasses the 30k it better be good to beat the new mustang GT, Camaro ss, BMW series 1, Infinity G37, so we will see...

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 The car beats a g37. I've raced G37 Mazda3 speed, BMW 3 eries. Honestly the reviews are horrible. Look up any 0-60 times here on youtube from regular people and you will see that they can do it in as little as 5 secs. Look up races and youll see. From ameature people themselves. If mitsu does their shit right, They will pull off the concept RA like all eclipse buyers want. I dont like FWD cars, i bought this one because of the power it cant put down on the ground. But i've

  • @Cloudstrife1188 yeah just keep dreaming.....get a job and maybe someday you will buy your dream car: the eclipse......i have seen lots of videos... i saw a video of a eclipse with a turbo that got beaten by a honda Si with a turbo or some shit like that....and the honda managed to beat it.....

  • @valenzuelatomas1989 hooked up the car with a little over 6 grand to have 433BHP and minimal wheelspin at the start. I want to see any mustang GT, any camaro, anything in the 30 grand, 40 grand, all the way upto 70 grand try and touch me in a drag race. 0-60 is 3.8 Seconds. Im gonna posts some videos up soon.

  • @Cloudstrife1188 what the heck are you nuts or what??? you said a car up to 70k dollars? a Nissan GT-R will destroy your car..... just forget it.....

  • my brother just got this car 2 days ago

  • dope ride.

  • i wish this car was

    had a turbo like the good days

  • GT-P is nice but what this car really needs is the same formula they used in the 1g and 2g eclipse GSXs. AWD and turbocharged.

  • I rather get the new honda accord.......but the eclipse is a nice look

  • Mitsubishi Eclipse its the BEST!!!!!!!!!!

  • this car is a fail the real death of that awful eclipse and a 3.8L!!! that so big to only make 260 hp fail fail fail! its just as bad as a mustang gt

  • incase you haven't heard,, japanese cars a restricted to a maximum of 280 hp

  • not any more buddy theres plenty of jap cars now that make more then 280 hp but the litter per horsepower ratio is very poor

  • What about nissan gtr and 370z? They are like 500 and 300 hp.

  • ugly again, front end looks alittle better

  • I test drove a 2008 Eclipse GT about a month ago and really enjoyed it. I'm 6'4" and had plenty of headroom and knee room. The steering is very responsive, but I didn't like the automatic transmission. It shifted rough and it didn't down-shift very well. Anyway, I decided to save up my money after test driving the new Hyundai Genesis coupe. Everything about that car was superior to the Eclipse. I will just have to wait about two years to afford a new Genesis coupe.

  • @morgand25 i whole-heartedly agree, the genesis coupe is so much better. but, remember, the 2.0t version is terrible, you need the 3.8 track manual.

  • which genesis coupe are u talking about.. Im planning to buy eclipse after i saw this thing, and u said differnetly.. is it that bad? coz to be honest genesis coupe is out of budget for me atm.. have u tried genesis coupe? tell me the differences please

  • The car looks great, but they really should bring back the AWD option. A RWD option would be interesting but I'm sure that would never happen.

  • @Tanner874 yeah, for some reason mitsu dont do rwd, the eclipse, fto and 3000gt coulve been rwd, but they were offered in fwd most of the time

  • The eclipse always had traction control.

  • I have read a lot of comments of people who dislike this car but as a fan and owner of eclipse I must deny them, this car looks great.Maybe adding some more power (HP) would be adequate but I think the model is totally out of this hemisphere and eclipse is evolving in good direction.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more