Republican Strategist Tantaros Thinks Suggesting She Undergo Waterboarding Is "Lame"

[stama9]

Tantaros is a shill for the fascism slowly taking root in the U.S. The intelligence was cherry picked and wrapped in a bow. George Tenet was pressured to hastily produce an NIE (national intelligence estimate) to implicate Iraq.

This bitch would be singing a different tune if it were a different president who had done this. She's a lying, unreliable, inhuman fascist.

[braininahat]

Hey, stupid (that would be you, zndprophet), she said, I"m not an accused terrorist," which is a lot different from "I'm not accused of being a terrorist trying to kill Americans."

The 15 thumbs up you got only shows that stupidity isn't an isolated incident among Liberals.

[tbeezy1]

Andrea Tantaros is hot but she should just shut the fuck up.

[wesleyfpt]

Very insightful Andrea..was it Rush Limbaugh or Karl Rove who was telling you what to say that day?

[bush1tman]

Democrats didn't ATTACK and distract for 8 years during the Bush admin? Laugh out loud!!!

[2952jazzman]

Wow what cunt!

[bush1tman]

That guy is a cunt, I agree.

[DeepSpaceFunk9]

what an ugly DETESTABLE CUNT that

tantaros is & i'm talking about her aurra..

this BITCH makes my skin crawl !!!!

[BIGjohnnySMITH]

Don't go to IdiotsForObamaCom i just went there and it tries to up load a virus on your computer! Go at your own risk!

[LuckyPierre78]

That idiot girl-gone-wild Contessa Brewer, as usual, was in way over her head.

[BIGjohnnySMITH]

God i hate everything that come out of tantaros mouth. Although i would love to put some cum in it.

[Facebook289]

wow lmfao

[EricGodClapton]

hahaha

[IdiotsForObamaCom]

why because she is smarter than you ya liberal pussy?

idiots4obama com is for pussies like you. dont hate her because she's informed and smart.

[BIGjohnnySMITH]

And you are? Why should i take any advice from a blowhard like you. I may give my opinion but i don't force its down other people's throat like you. You are just another idiot who thinks they are better than everyone else democrat or republican. I am going to keep believing what i believe and i suggest you keep your bullshit to yourself. You call me a pussy on youtube but i bet you wouldn't say that to my face, you're real tough online aren't you?

[bush1tman]

if you could get it up. Ha ha hah

[F33bs]

Chris Kofinis is an ineffective weakling.

I'm a liberal, but I have to respect the veracity and presentation of the Republicans trained dogs.

Tantaros, while a complete GOP bimbo with no intellectual credibility, at least seems like she has because she's good at arguing.

Democrats need to get some people with some balls to go up against these minions.

[r3t4y5]

Waterboarding surely beats cutting someone head off halfway and letting him bleed to death.

That's the favourite torture technique of bosnian and chechen muslimnazi's in eastern europe.

Check truthtube tv for proof. It's not pretty.

[F33bs]

"Waterboarding surely beats cutting someone head off halfway and letting him bleed to death."

And not waterboarding surely beats waterboarding, huh?

Idiot.

[r3t4y5]

You are one of those hippies who would kiss the ape that raped his mother and produced you.

You were sick in the brain at birth. The spermcocktail that produced you must have had some nasty history.

Either that or your momma was a crackwhore.

Faggot.

[F33bs]

*yaaaaaawn*

Heard it all before, spud. Gonna have to come back with something a little less weak.

Good luck!

[r3t4y5]

Yes, complaining about a lack of substance when confronted with your own is standard reaction from fools like you.

You prooved that with your first comment already.

You're not looking good here...

[F33bs]

Not a lack of substance, rather, a lack of original substance. A lack of anything worth value.

If you are going to substitute a proper response with boring inanity, at least do it with style.

I did appreciate the ending, a simple "Faggot." Complete with a period for decency. However the rest of your performance was bland to say the least.

[peterbilt946]

tantaros can do anything she wants to me, she is gorgeous and is a conservative

[ochoastl]

it's comments like this that make me so damn proud.... unfortunately, I also feel the same way about her... but I won't fight you, that's just not my style.

[queendavey]

RIDICULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DISTRACTION

the REP's are missing the point... it's not about Pelosi It's about torturing... GET BACK ON THE SUBJECT MATTER. This woman is so lame... a mere talking head who has been CORN FED ... Everybodys hands are dirty... Now, let's moveon... .What do we do about torturing or not torturing "terrorist"? STAY ON POINT REPUBLICANS After we get an answer on that, then you guys can start the firing and prosecuting...

[darktoadthesticky]

So, if I have this right, Telling the Truth, is anti-Republican???

And Lets just say that Nancy is telling the truth, how would she prove it, when she isn't permitted to keep any records from the meeting.

Now Lets say she is Lying, how can we prove it with the CIA's record of dishonesty?

But more important, why are we being distracted from the real problem, that the USA is now a country with war criminals?

[robbe21]

What a pathetic circus. Sorry, but it is. Absolutely embarrassing to watch.

[GreatBigChangeComin]

I bet Andrea's got a caterpillar.

[dennisthapa]

i used to be a moderate...now im never voting for an incumbent republican. what a joke of a political game they are playing

[garthggarth]

Republicans are bullies who show no respect for anyone who respectfully disagrees with them.

They can't touch Obama, at the moment, so they go after the Speaker...

It's ludicrous, adn the rest of the world sees it as juvenile.

[MethRattle]

Republicans have no problem considering the shutting-off of someone's air supply in order to make them think they're drowning (i.e. waterboarding) to be legal and not torture, but they think it's an outrage that Pelosi might have known about it? If it isn't torture, then it doesn't matter what Pelosi knew or when she knew it, right? Just typical Republican distraction-with-no-constructi­on strategy. The GOP is so pathetic nowadays.

[xdir]

Dems should stop offering to waterboard people as a counter argument, just explain the simple fact that Waterboarding does not work and if you do get valid information then should America apologize to the Japanese soldiers executed for waterboarding?

Also should US POWs who made propaganda materials after being tortured be prosecuted, because IF torture leads to the truth then those soldiers where speaking from the heart and not duress!!

[dawgnpony]

The CIA had stated that former Senator Bob Graham had attended four briefings and after Graham checked his records, the CIA revised their 'records' to one briefing. Their excuse for the discrepancy was a "bookkeeping" error. Need I remind anyone that this was the CIA under the direction of George "Slam Dunk" Tenet who resigned on June 3, 2004, under the cloud of incompetence at the least and manipulation and fabrication of data at the worst. Who are you going to believe?

[dawgnpony]

According to CIA records, the briefing in question that Pelosi attended was also attended by Representative Porter Goss (R-FL) who took over as CIA director upon Tenet's resignation (Sep 2004). After approximately 20 months, (May 2006) Goss was forced to resign amidst the Watergate Poker Parties scandal that surface during the Foggo/Wilkes/Cunningham bribery investigation. All 3 were convicted of crimes revolving around CIA contracts; Goss is on the lecture circuit. Who are you going to believe?

[dawgnpony]

If water-boarding is a legal interrogation tactic with the exception of those in military uniform as protected by the Third Geneva Convention which many Republicans and their pundits suggest, the American citizenry is not protected under the prevues of the Constitution and therefore, in the not too distant future we can expect water-boarding and other forms of harsh techniques used routinely on suspects during criminal investigations. This is how it starts.

[pilotamurorei]

Supposedly some U.S. soldiers abducted in Afghanistan or somewhere were waterboarded. I forgot where I heard it though :(

[misssophie119]

greek on greek fight. omg lol

[kelseywall]

Both of these "strategists" sucked.

[areki38]

Save for Ron Paul, I haven't seen or heard a republican who could be taken seriously for years. Why even debate them?

They show only disrespect for reason and logic.

These are the kids whose parents are called in for because of their notorious behaviour and constant lying.

Can't save them.

[ahnch]

high school level debate...I concur, but probably lower than that. Unfortunately this is the type of debate Americans are subject to bear.

[PeterOrszagCallMe]

Luckily, Pelosi doesn't have to win in a national election--only here in CA, where she's got a lot of power and the Reuplicans will always run far right people against her.

[thid1]

high-school level debate. if that.

[zndprophet]

I say Tantaros is a terrorist trying to kill Americans. There. Now she's accused. Let the waterboarding begin.

[DestructerX]

according to bush and cheney what you just said is completely legal.

[zndprophet]

also according to Ms. Tantaros herself.

[LordVigeous666999]

And that is why we don't put people like you in charge of the CIA

Water boarding is a last resort, and only used in situations where there is a ticking time bomb scenario

You know, like KSM, when the information he provided lead to stopping a terrorist cell in california, that was in the planning and recruiting stages of a 9/11 style attack on the west coast

But I assume, rather than stopping that, you'd want to water board republicans? Or maybe give the terrorist a fluffy new pillow?

[bbbbmer]

the only one who was lame was that republican cunt who is nothing more than a coward mouthpiece for fascism

[PeterOrszagCallMe]

And the "host" of the segment who let the Repulican go on and on but wouldn't let the other guy even finish a thought.

[bbbbmer]

agreed!

[adamsfall]

OH! Now it wasn't faulty intelligence that got us into Iraq. What was it then, lying? The Republicans write everything in pencil to be erased and re-witten at a later date.

[LordVigeous666999]

Typically our intelligence under estimates the threat we face, every instance we've gone into a country we've found this. So, for the first time, the inteligence of every major ally of ours, over estimated, it happens

Also, we've been talking about going into Iraq since half way through Clintons admin. 9/11 happened in 2001, we invaded Iraq in 2003, so Saddam had a full two years to move stuff around

But the really important question is, did you think that Saddam.... DIDN'T have the weapons?

[adamsfall]

@LordVigeous666999  When Bush told the weapons inspectors to leave Iraq early, I really had some doubts. Aside from Al Qaeda, when did we underestimate a threat to us? If Saddam moved the weapons around, where are they now?

[LordVigeous666999]

first gulf war, our intelligence said Saddam had chemical weapons, but our intelligence said he had nothing in nuclear

After we invaded we found out he had a nuclear program well under way, was pursuing nuclear material, and was developing the technology to use it. there is one example, just off the top of my head, I didn't even have to think about it

and before I answer your 2nd question, again I'll ask mine; in 2003, before we invaded, did you think that Saddam did NOT have chemical weapons?

[adamsfall]

Between 91 and 03, There were no weapons and no nuclear program. Period. Before we invaded, I thought it was possible, because the Bush admin were insisting there was. But, as I said, right before the invasion, when the inspectors were told to leave, I became very suspicious. Now, please share your theory of where the "WMDs" are, 7 years later.

[LordVigeous666999]

Bush was not saying it, every intelligence agency in the world was saying it. The brits, germans, french if I'm not mistaken, etc etc.

Go on youtube, and look up the first couple speeches bush made about the war, one of the reason he cites, is that Saddam was not co-operating with the weapons inspectors, if you do your research, you'll find Bill Clinton made speeches to this effect as well

[LordVigeous666999]

And before I can answer your question, I need to know how you define a WMD. How many deaths in one fell swoop? 10,000? 100,000? 1 million? 10 million? When does it become a WMD?

[LordVigeous666999]

@adamsfall

So there were no WMDs between 91-03? And you cannot define what a WMD is? How do you know there were none there, if you cannot define what was not there?

and after we finish this WMD thing, then we can talk about all the other reasons BUSH said we needed to Iraq for. You know, the reasons that were used to get the authorization to use force from congress? Before Colin Powell made a fool of himself by blowing the intelligence out of proportion to get UN support, which he failed in

[adamsfall]

@LordVigeous666999 Okay, so the term WMD is rendered meaningless by your parsing of words. And what are the other reasons that Bush indicated PRIOR to the invasion? And, I believe it was the Germans who said that "curveball" was not reliable. What did the weapons inspectors themselves say? maybe you should research that.

[LordVigeous666999]

how is it parsing words to ask what a WMD is? A pistol kills a single person with one pulling of the trigger. A nuclear weapon can kill millions with a single pushing of the button

why is it parsing words to ask, at what number of lives, you draw the line? I need to know this, so I can tell you if we found WMDs or not

[LordVigeous666999]

To your question; Bush cited saddam firing missiles at US planes in violation of the 1st gulf war peace treaty. as you know, we had control of the south and north air space of Iraq to protect the kurds and the shites that saddam had a tendency to kill a lot. He fired upon our planes over 3,000+ separate occasions. And this is a low estimate, do the math, this is about once a day

And no one was killed, true, but if someone fires a gun at you, you don't say, "don't stop him, hes a bad shot"

[LordVigeous666999]

this is just one of the OTHER reasons, Bush cited pre-war. He also cited Saddam having terrorist connections. And seeing as during the war, we picked up Al-zarakwee, (sorry for bad spelling), in Iraq, who was the Leader of Al-qida in Mesopatamia, and endorsed by Bin Laden, with an Iraqi Passport, I think that was justified

As well as the terrorist training camp in northern Iraq, you know, the one we were negotiating with Turkey, to use that country as a launching pad to attack?

[LordVigeous666999]

Did you know about that? Of course you did not. Because of two things; 1) you don't watch FOX, so of course you are not informed on the war, liberals need to keep you stupid, to keep you on their side

2) you don't have friends and family over seas like I do, so you don't pay attention as much. I'm playing with a little more investment

thats just 2 OTHER reasons that Bush cited Pre-war, there is pretty long list

[adamsfall]

@LordVigeous666999 WMD=Biological, chemical, or nuclear weapons. Saddam had none of these.

[LordVigeous666999]

So if I have one molecule of anthrax, I have a WMD? I think lives are a better measure. But I'll drop that, because you refuse to answer it, why? I don't know

I was hoping for a definition that was harder to reach than mine, but fine, we'll go with yours. Next question. Do you merely need to have the chemicals or biological agents intact for it to be considered a WMD?

Or do you need the chemical loaded into a working missile or delivery system and as soon as you push the red button people die?