There was no need to drop the bomb because towards to end the Japanese were shooting bamboo bullets & were ready to sign a treaty but the stupid US said they had to drop it somewhere more for their ego then to prove a point. & there were POW camps that were incinerated with US POWs dumb fucking, cock sucking, power hungry, brainwashed, GM food eating, USA Military!
@teenee4 The Japanese could have been throwing rocks for all it mattered - they were not going to give up without a fight. A million plus casualties was the estimate. In that sense, it saved lives.
If you want to complain about excessive force or casualties, start with the Russians, or Manchuria.
@quicksliversbutt Wait a second, the Americans who were dying, bless them all, but at least they were soldiers; the Japanese lost lots families and innocent people, may those poor civilians RIP. There isn't any point in defending the bomb.
@Illkiron Yes, there is, because I can and I believe if it hadn't happened, the war could have been LOST! Can you imagine? We would be speaking german!
@quicksliversbutt Hitler was dead when they sent the bomb. Besides Japan being destroyed already: the US had several cities bombed and most of them had wood buildings, they burnt and many many people lost their homes. The war in Europe was won, the marines were at Japan's doorstep, throwing the bomb was just to show the world who was in charge.
@Illkiron I'm quoting another comment here: "Hiroshima had a high concentration of troops, military facilities and military factories that had not yet been subject to significant damage."
1st link when I googled "Why was Hiroshima chosen"
What a civilian considers a "cowerdly act", leaders consider a "preventive measure" and the 1st of two "war ending blows"
I don't read war propaganda, i just think by myself, and ever body knowns, that type of mega-destructive bomb, don't need to be do much for they understand it's capability, for sure wasn't need to be use in humans, or evaporating humans. If States do that in other place, even if there wasn't people over there, they will get the picture, and understand the message, capitulate. There's no excuse to do that in civilians, even if there was a military base inside the city.
US just wanted to show off power. i wonder what terrorism really means....
devilesence 1 month ago
There was no need to drop the bomb because towards to end the Japanese were shooting bamboo bullets & were ready to sign a treaty but the stupid US said they had to drop it somewhere more for their ego then to prove a point. & there were POW camps that were incinerated with US POWs dumb fucking, cock sucking, power hungry, brainwashed, GM food eating, USA Military!
teenee4 2 months ago
@teenee4 The Japanese could have been throwing rocks for all it mattered - they were not going to give up without a fight. A million plus casualties was the estimate. In that sense, it saved lives.
If you want to complain about excessive force or casualties, start with the Russians, or Manchuria.
iambored404 2 months ago
@iambored404 or the jewish led holocaust against palastinians.
ZionistCensorship 1 month ago
Americans should stop defending the bomb or whatever... japanese families died, not only soldiers
Illkiron 6 months ago
@Illkiron I'm pretty sure there is no debate about that... It ended a war where even more people could have died.
quicksliversbutt 3 months ago
@quicksliversbutt Wait a second, the Americans who were dying, bless them all, but at least they were soldiers; the Japanese lost lots families and innocent people, may those poor civilians RIP. There isn't any point in defending the bomb.
Illkiron 3 months ago
@Illkiron Yes, there is, because I can and I believe if it hadn't happened, the war could have been LOST! Can you imagine? We would be speaking german!
quicksliversbutt 3 months ago
@quicksliversbutt Hitler was dead when they sent the bomb. Besides Japan being destroyed already: the US had several cities bombed and most of them had wood buildings, they burnt and many many people lost their homes. The war in Europe was won, the marines were at Japan's doorstep, throwing the bomb was just to show the world who was in charge.
Illkiron 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Illkiron I'm quoting another comment here: "Hiroshima had a high concentration of troops, military facilities and military factories that had not yet been subject to significant damage."
1st link when I googled "Why was Hiroshima chosen"
What a civilian considers a "cowerdly act", leaders consider a "preventive measure" and the 1st of two "war ending blows"
quicksliversbutt 3 months ago
The Japanese didn't believe in surrender. They reaped and the sowed. Tough love was called for and they got it. Next.
boils2 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A day that will live in infamy!
LimitedNewsCorp 6 months ago
Coward act from a coward nation, should do that on a militar target, not on civilian.
filipaopereire 6 months ago
@filipaopereire
"Hiroshima had a high concentration of troops, military facilities and military factories that had not yet been subject to significant damage."
1st link when I googled "Why was Hiroshima chosen"
What a civilian considers a "cowerdly act", leaders consider a "preventive measure" and the 1st of two "war ending blows"
junkyard355regal 6 months ago
@junkyard355regal
I don't read war propaganda, i just think by myself, and ever body knowns, that type of mega-destructive bomb, don't need to be do much for they understand it's capability, for sure wasn't need to be use in humans, or evaporating humans. If States do that in other place, even if there wasn't people over there, they will get the picture, and understand the message, capitulate. There's no excuse to do that in civilians, even if there was a military base inside the city.
filipaopereire 6 months ago
Had to happen.
noblered5 6 months ago
nothing like tragedy to bring up the views..huh? and open old wounds...sheeesh!
dangermous1968 6 months ago