Is this the same Brian Coleman who used Article 10 of the ECHR to defend his right to freedom of speech against charges brought against him by his own Council's Standards Committee?
"His solicitor further argued that the Code must be applied in light of Cllr Coleman’s right to freedom of expression (in accordance with Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights)."
Seems it's "human rights, my backside" for mere citizens but he's happy to use human rights to save his OWN backside!
The man obviously doesn't know what he is talking aboutt. Libel laws aready apply to the internet. What he appears keen to do is control the Internet so he can stop others exposing him as the not fit for purpose councillor that he is.
This has been flagged as spam show
Is this the same Brian Coleman who used Article 10 of the ECHR to defend his right to freedom of speech against charges brought against him by his own Council's Standards Committee?
"His solicitor further argued that the Code must be applied in light of Cllr Coleman’s right to freedom of expression (in accordance with Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights)."
Seems it's "human rights, my backside" for mere citizens but he's happy to use human rights to save his OWN backside!
danfhope 1 month ago
Comment removed
danfhope 1 month ago
The man obviously doesn't know what he is talking aboutt. Libel laws aready apply to the internet. What he appears keen to do is control the Internet so he can stop others exposing him as the not fit for purpose councillor that he is.
cwacwatcher 1 month ago