their ambition to generate as much revenue as possible by selling extrem amounts of contraband, thats illegle to most develop countries such as u.s.a of america or europan countries to get good tast of living in the upper class neibourhoods,high tech cars,classic suites, and accessories.They will stop at nothing to get those pleasurable things to accomidate their appetite for world riches even sacrificingt livestocks of their asociates to take a fault for them, or throwing them under harm way.
Alright third world countries like brazil is sustaining a population crisis of 78 milllion people, and most of them, are living in poverty at ghettos, slums were poorest sum of people migrate in for its the most affordable place to live.But most of the brazlilians that dwell their will assocciate into the criminal entrepirse for abunch of reason such as security,fortunes, and money made througth violence.These loss cause of people will get invove with illicite criminal activites to support
3.50 the IRA... I'm from Ireland, and I agree with what people are saying about the retart (bearded guy) makes no sense he hasn't a clue about anything can't believe he is still alive and breathing!
The bearded guy is the typical brazilian communist dickwad with no realistic sense about economic facts at all. The traffic got plenty Kalashnikovs but obviously he preaches against Colt factories, as if closing an american gun factory would stop guerrilas from getting their hands on weaponry from anywhere else.
It wouldn't stop, but it would certainly make things more difficult.... and can't we apply the same reasoning to americans trying to control (shut down) the production of drugs in other countries? Certainly it wouldn't stop americans from getting their hands on drugs (in fact people can manufacture methamphetamines right there in the US)... but the US government insists on the premise that drug control in other countries will help them.
Closing an american factory would make no difference at all. The heavy guns sported by drug dealers could come from anywhere all around the world (Russia, Israel, Germany...) and are mainly left overs from past wars sold by mercenaries. The other big chunk of it comes from brazilian crooked cops, as the kid said himself.
The same can be said of the American intervention in the drug production--they can diminish drug production in, let's say Bolivia, but another country will produce the the goods (drugs) demanded by the American market.
I believe too that if there's demand there'll always be drugs on the market. But fighting traffic is foremostly a matter of fighting organized crime, diluting the criminal power behind traffic. Who killed Escobar? Americans did, 'cause Escobar bought every single authority in this shitpile we call Latin America. The problem was not just the massive sum of coke being smuggled, but the corrupting social political cancer Medellin had become.
So what you are saying is that it is wrong for organize crime to exploit people within a society? It's funny, because I don't see any shouts of protest against US economical exploitation of other countries.
So, it is alright to exploit, as long as it is the US who does the exploitation, right?
If you cuss again, you will be blocked. You are welcome to express you ideas without propagating hatred, racism and xenophobia: this is not Fox News nor a support forum for 12-steppers.
You can do whatever you want, but I'm certainly not the one being xenophobic here. By the way I'm brazilian as well, and I'm just speaking my mind when I say that this sort of ideological rant perpetrated by the guy in this video is not a solution for our problems. It's just ideological bigotry.
The whole thing is so simple, that it can be reduced to a single sentence: the "problem was not just the massive sum of coke being smuggled, but the corrupting social political cancer Medellin had become"... I wish things in the real world were like that.
I wasn't standing for US economical stances, nor I'm willing to do. I'm just saying that blind, nonsensical anti-americanism will not sort out our problems. As I said the drug/crime problem is rooted somewhere else. Yes, organized crime is a social cancer and I suggest you read a little bit more about what actually was Medellin.
@caribolas excuse me? shitpile? so the americans organize coupdetats all over south america, trying to enslave the people through high debt that they forced those countries to get into, so that americans can have an abnormally over-luxurious life, an now that these people are paying for your comfort, you decide to just call them whatever you want just for the hell of it? please dude, at least show some respect if you're not going to fix the problem your fore-fathers caused
@VituMV first off, I'm not american neither support US foreign policy. I'm latin by the way. Second, the idea that US enjoys high standards because of our external debt is pretty hysterical. Get yourself some historical education and learn what capital accumulation is about. Third, if the US could simply "force" nations to be indebted, they would be creditors instead of owing 13 trillions. Turn on the news.
@caribolas the money they owe, they owe it to themselves, therefor they will never have to pay that debt. So you're telling me that the fact that the US enjoys the high standards has nothing to do with the fact the people in other countries are getting poorer? Maybe you're going to tell me next that the US only goes to war when they need to free poor people from the hands of evil empires, and that they only benefit from it sometimes, and money is never a reason for war.
@VituMV biggest holders of US debt are China, Japan, UK and BRAZIL. Plus, the idea that government can simply "not pay" its debt just because creditors are national citizens is nonsensical. US had the biggest GDP in the world long before they got involved in any war. Get your facts straight. Not agreeing with US policies is reasonable, and I don't. But thinking they're wealthy just because they're some sort of global pirates is ridiculous.
But the most disgusting bit is that socialists like the fuckface in this video have the nerve to support FARC, even knowing every single gun that comes across the borders is sold by the FARC. One name for that: hypocrisy
that man is so dumb, talking about closing colt..... like the bope and civil police use m-4's m-16 a2's use c-7s use ar-15's though he wants to close the factory.... like so dumb
Well, you actually missed the point. The USA and other countries criminalize drugs and impose pressure in the drug-producing countries to shutdown the means of production.
So this is their line of thought: if these poor countries dont produce drugs, we wont have a drug problem in our own country. This guy is pointing out that this argument is a two-edge sword; by the same token: if the USA and other countries did not massively and *illicitly * supplied the drug producers with weapons, local law enforcement wouldnt have such a difficult time shutting them down.
very true. but he's talking about shutting the colt factory, by doing that soldiers in irak afghanistan, special forces, elite polices like b.o.p.e and r.o.t.a and forces like c.o.t and c.o.e.
these special forces will need to get some new weapons, though the m-16a2 and c-7-c-8 beeing one of the best in the world
their ambition to generate as much revenue as possible by selling extrem amounts of contraband, thats illegle to most develop countries such as u.s.a of america or europan countries to get good tast of living in the upper class neibourhoods,high tech cars,classic suites, and accessories.They will stop at nothing to get those pleasurable things to accomidate their appetite for world riches even sacrificingt livestocks of their asociates to take a fault for them, or throwing them under harm way.
FernandezJPaul 2 months ago
Alright third world countries like brazil is sustaining a population crisis of 78 milllion people, and most of them, are living in poverty at ghettos, slums were poorest sum of people migrate in for its the most affordable place to live.But most of the brazlilians that dwell their will assocciate into the criminal entrepirse for abunch of reason such as security,fortunes, and money made througth violence.These loss cause of people will get invove with illicite criminal activites to support
FernandezJPaul 2 months ago
3.50 the IRA... I'm from Ireland, and I agree with what people are saying about the retart (bearded guy) makes no sense he hasn't a clue about anything can't believe he is still alive and breathing!
PiNkpRo 6 months ago
Awesome video's! (I removed my previous comment, had the wrong tab open :S)!
Lammetj3 2 years ago
Comment removed
Lammetj3 2 years ago
Irmao, valeu pelo video. Se puder deixar uma ideia: ele fala Libia ao inves de Liberia. Paz irmao.
FMRees 2 years ago
The bearded guy is the typical brazilian communist dickwad with no realistic sense about economic facts at all. The traffic got plenty Kalashnikovs but obviously he preaches against Colt factories, as if closing an american gun factory would stop guerrilas from getting their hands on weaponry from anywhere else.
caribolas 2 years ago
It wouldn't stop, but it would certainly make things more difficult.... and can't we apply the same reasoning to americans trying to control (shut down) the production of drugs in other countries? Certainly it wouldn't stop americans from getting their hands on drugs (in fact people can manufacture methamphetamines right there in the US)... but the US government insists on the premise that drug control in other countries will help them.
MulekeDoido6669 2 years ago
Closing an american factory would make no difference at all. The heavy guns sported by drug dealers could come from anywhere all around the world (Russia, Israel, Germany...) and are mainly left overs from past wars sold by mercenaries. The other big chunk of it comes from brazilian crooked cops, as the kid said himself.
caribolas 2 years ago
The same can be said of the American intervention in the drug production--they can diminish drug production in, let's say Bolivia, but another country will produce the the goods (drugs) demanded by the American market.
MulekeDoido6669 2 years ago
I believe too that if there's demand there'll always be drugs on the market. But fighting traffic is foremostly a matter of fighting organized crime, diluting the criminal power behind traffic. Who killed Escobar? Americans did, 'cause Escobar bought every single authority in this shitpile we call Latin America. The problem was not just the massive sum of coke being smuggled, but the corrupting social political cancer Medellin had become.
caribolas 2 years ago
So what you are saying is that it is wrong for organize crime to exploit people within a society? It's funny, because I don't see any shouts of protest against US economical exploitation of other countries.
So, it is alright to exploit, as long as it is the US who does the exploitation, right?
If you cuss again, you will be blocked. You are welcome to express you ideas without propagating hatred, racism and xenophobia: this is not Fox News nor a support forum for 12-steppers.
MulekeDoido6669 2 years ago
You can do whatever you want, but I'm certainly not the one being xenophobic here. By the way I'm brazilian as well, and I'm just speaking my mind when I say that this sort of ideological rant perpetrated by the guy in this video is not a solution for our problems. It's just ideological bigotry.
caribolas 2 years ago
The whole thing is so simple, that it can be reduced to a single sentence: the "problem was not just the massive sum of coke being smuggled, but the corrupting social political cancer Medellin had become"... I wish things in the real world were like that.
MulekeDoido6669 2 years ago
I wasn't standing for US economical stances, nor I'm willing to do. I'm just saying that blind, nonsensical anti-americanism will not sort out our problems. As I said the drug/crime problem is rooted somewhere else. Yes, organized crime is a social cancer and I suggest you read a little bit more about what actually was Medellin.
caribolas 2 years ago
@caribolas excuse me? shitpile? so the americans organize coupdetats all over south america, trying to enslave the people through high debt that they forced those countries to get into, so that americans can have an abnormally over-luxurious life, an now that these people are paying for your comfort, you decide to just call them whatever you want just for the hell of it? please dude, at least show some respect if you're not going to fix the problem your fore-fathers caused
VituMV 1 year ago
@VituMV first off, I'm not american neither support US foreign policy. I'm latin by the way. Second, the idea that US enjoys high standards because of our external debt is pretty hysterical. Get yourself some historical education and learn what capital accumulation is about. Third, if the US could simply "force" nations to be indebted, they would be creditors instead of owing 13 trillions. Turn on the news.
caribolas 1 year ago
@caribolas the money they owe, they owe it to themselves, therefor they will never have to pay that debt. So you're telling me that the fact that the US enjoys the high standards has nothing to do with the fact the people in other countries are getting poorer? Maybe you're going to tell me next that the US only goes to war when they need to free poor people from the hands of evil empires, and that they only benefit from it sometimes, and money is never a reason for war.
VituMV 1 year ago
@VituMV biggest holders of US debt are China, Japan, UK and BRAZIL. Plus, the idea that government can simply "not pay" its debt just because creditors are national citizens is nonsensical. US had the biggest GDP in the world long before they got involved in any war. Get your facts straight. Not agreeing with US policies is reasonable, and I don't. But thinking they're wealthy just because they're some sort of global pirates is ridiculous.
caribolas 1 year ago
@caribolas Really, you think it's ridiculous? well, mr Bush said it himself, but even if he said it to your face, you probably wouldn't believe him
VituMV 1 year ago
But the most disgusting bit is that socialists like the fuckface in this video have the nerve to support FARC, even knowing every single gun that comes across the borders is sold by the FARC. One name for that: hypocrisy
caribolas 2 years ago
why are we speanking englsih , every one here is brazilian
StewartBrasil 2 years ago
becouse wew were alphabetized in english lol
eduardockv 2 years ago
that man is so dumb, talking about closing colt..... like the bope and civil police use m-4's m-16 a2's use c-7s use ar-15's though he wants to close the factory.... like so dumb
ivan2095 2 years ago
Part1:
Well, you actually missed the point. The USA and other countries criminalize drugs and impose pressure in the drug-producing countries to shutdown the means of production.
MulekeDoido6669 2 years ago
oh ok thank you
ivan2095 2 years ago
Part2:
So this is their line of thought: if these poor countries dont produce drugs, we wont have a drug problem in our own country. This guy is pointing out that this argument is a two-edge sword; by the same token: if the USA and other countries did not massively and *illicitly * supplied the drug producers with weapons, local law enforcement wouldnt have such a difficult time shutting them down.
MulekeDoido6669 2 years ago
very true. but he's talking about shutting the colt factory, by doing that soldiers in irak afghanistan, special forces, elite polices like b.o.p.e and r.o.t.a and forces like c.o.t and c.o.e.
these special forces will need to get some new weapons, though the m-16a2 and c-7-c-8 beeing one of the best in the world
ivan2095 2 years ago
HOLY SHIT!
Bock4549 2 years ago