so when is the judge going to run for president,i would vote for him for sure,by the way support ron paul or get fucked a little bit more ,a little bit harder by the system.
Freedom of mind, yes. Do you own your own body, yes. But why should property, something that you aquire under a million acts of chance and circumstance be respected the same way? The fucking Nike shoes you are wearing are probably the product of something similar to slave labour.
You cannot just demand change without offering a decent solution, lest not if you really expect change. I wish you should go back to the time when the U.S. Constitution was written, then you would be able to kiss your kings asx. I doubt you would risk your neck for your own rights, let alone the rights of others i.e. the second class citizens you speak of. Yet I have hope for you, after you've seen the world for what it is, you will beg for the rights this document has offered to us. @royalstcav
@superlativeOFgood I have far more respect for kings and monarchy then I do have for republics. In my oppion Kings are far more braver then elected presidents. In history you see many kings like William I, Harold I,Richard I, Edward I, Richard III and Henry VII who personally fought on the battle field with their troops and in the cases of Harold I, Richard I and Richard III died on the battle field. They did not flee from danger like presidents like James Madison. Presidents like to say safe.
@RoyalistCavalier Just like I said, YOU are a coward. You are also one of the many circle talkers that keep changing the subject instead of facing the responses directly. Please stop slamming the U.S.A.using our DOD ARPANET created systems (U.S. invention) and just use the systems that your countrymen invented. Is there one?
By the way you're drawing on over a thousand years of royalty and you come up with six. lol. Which ones fought in the 20th century?
Judge Andrew Napolitano should realise how disgusting and hypocrital the Constitution is. The Consitution never allowed women to vote until 1920. If the Constituion meant what is says, then the United States should have had women governors, mayors, senators, representives, secetaries and presidents and vice presidents as early as it's independece, but it did not. The Constituion belongs in the trash bin. Slave owners such as Washington and Jefferson have no right to speak about freedom/liberty.
@RoyalistCavalier If you rip up the Constitution do not hold up the shreds for protection. If you are not a U.S. citizen, you really have no say in this, and I for one do not care what you think. (about our Constitution)
@superlativeOFgood The Constitution did not protect blacks, Indians and women from being treated as 2nd class citizens. The Constitution only gave freedom and liberty to landed white men. This fact alone is why the United States Constitution must be dumped int the trash bin of history and a new one written by people who are not plantation slave owners such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. A plantation slave owner talking about libery is like a Nazi talking about Jewish rights.
@RoyalistCavalier I agree that all people should have been considered, however you cannot start a new constitution without using the flawed government we have today. Who do you believe would be qualified to write it today, and if you have a good answer, what if others prefer a choice you don't care for. For better or worse this is the document we have. As for the "property of men" I blame the bible and the history of western civilization for their contemporary views.
@superlativeOFgood The flawed government that the United States is a direct result of the Constitution. I love how Constitutionalists complain that the United States is run by the corporations and big buisness, well it has always been like this. Many of the people who wrote the Constitution were what we can call speciali interest groups such as George Washington who was a planter and Alexander Hamilton who was a banker. Alexander Hamilton would be a big fan of the Federal Reserve.
@superlativeOFgood The founding fathers of the United States who talked and preached about liberty and equality and freedoms themselves did not live up to their ideals. Liberty and freedoms were denied to women, Indians and blacks and I do recall that John Adams (Hero of Constituionalists) himself created the Alien and Seditious Acts which put people in jail for excersing freedom of speech. The founding fathers did not want freedom and liberty fro the lower classes but wanted all the power.
@superlativeOFgood Now this is a real shame that women only got the right to vote in 1920, which is so wrong and shows you how pathetic and hypocrital the Constitution was and is. The men who wrote the Constitution only applied liberty and rights to white men, women were treated little more then property of the men. Now I would have had more respect for the Constituion if it meant what is says and women should have been allowed to run for president and other offices as soon as it was signed.
@superlativeOFgood The United States Constitution allowed the institution of slavery to flourish and did nothing to abolish it until the 1860's and that only happend because of the American civil war. The politicans in the south and the vas majority of the people not only did not support the abolishment of slavery but fought to keep it alive at the cost of about a milliond dead. Which was it, the Constitution or the Bill of Rights which declared a black person 3/5 of worth to a white person.
smart guy alright, however everyone one of his arguments can be considered debatable, to either side. Healthcare for example, and capitalism can in fact co-exist, if only the greed facotr were tempered, in direct proporation to need. Period.
This is a tremendously-important sort of presentation. However, I sadly note my opinion that the Judge here appears to greatly sell himself short by appearing unduly flattered at the mere thought of his being nominated to the Supreme Court by Ron Paul, were the latter elected President. Rather, I think the judge should think about what he might say or write under the much more ambitious scenario wherein the rewriting of the Constitution of the United State of America is the task set before him!
Napolitano, Paul, Rockwell, Woods... The Refounders... I am so grateful to have these gentlemen to learn from, and for the Mises Institute providing them such a great venue to teach from.
What is so freaky is that teabaggers who call themselves libertarians have no idea what Austrian Economics is and who Von Mises was. Objectivists would. Ayn Rand did. "Libertarians", fake ones, somehow think Ayn Rand was a Libertarian or a fake Republican like Ron Paul. Paul is the only real, effective Libertarian. Rand hated libertarianism and she hated Ronald Reagan. Unfortunately, she would have also hated EDDIE MUNSTER here, Judge Napolitano. These Alabamans probably think Mises was German.
If we were at 1776 we would have confidence to reply -Yes.
In 2011 it will take a lot more then Fine Words and Ideal Sentiment to confront the enthroned evil of the NWO
Note, the NWO is no King George III.
If you want Liberty we will need to wrestle the power back and that my fellow citizens will involve Mega Death and an Irradiated World and the end of everything we hold dear. It's one Hell of a mess and there are no soft options.
I know the two men who get my vote, providing the "Council of 13" doesn't make this country a dictatorship before the election. Check the Alex Jones channel on the super congress.
@deficithawker Are you expecting a certain kind of answer? I say none, I believe it has to do with the fact that if someone commits a wrong according to one state's laws, and they escape to another state whose laws do not bar him from his past action, he must be transported back to the previous state for due process.
It doesn't get any better than this. AND I HAVE HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF VOTING AGAINST CONGRESSMAN JAMES CLYBURN FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS, TO NO AVAIL. He has got the people in SC who he supposedly represents DUPED !!!! Thank the Good Lord for the likes of JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO.
God Bless The Judge, and God Bless America. Please post on FACEBOOK....
Stop the bribes to the judges of California. Los Angeles County judges are receiving $57,688.00 per year per judge. That is on top of the pay and benefits they already receive from the STATE.
Sturgeon v Los Angels County declared those payments to be unconstitutional. Granting judges RETRO ACTIVE IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION for taking bribes under SBX211 is unconstitutional. LOSS OF DUE PROCCESS, FRAUD ON THE COURT.
"When the Mustang Ranch in Nevada was taken over by the IRS for failure to pay income taxes and the Government ran it, they bankrupted it. So let me get this straight..," "the Government can't provide booze and hookers to truckers in the desert and they want to manage health care!?" - Judge
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, and safe, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some say they hear, do it.
@PJCelis The Judge and Paul are, if not anarchists themselves, at least not opposed to anarchism. Unlike many 'minarchists' they realise that there is nothing wrong with people choosing to eschew all coercion, even if it isn't 'stable'
This should be required study by all high school students. Judge Napolitano has a perfect understanding of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The U.S. Supreme Court needs to hear this as well as all of Congress.
@TheRoadrocket Actually, it is arguable that the Constitution is anti-libertarian - after all, it was written by East Coast elites, passed illegally, supported by the Mercantalist-Centralist Federalists and sponsored by banksters. The Judge has a libertarian interpretation of the Constitution, but that doesn't make it the correct one.
@OutlawCongress I guess all the West Coast elites were busy in 1787 To bad Obama wasnt around, he would have told them "now let me be clear, we need to get this Constitution ratified up in here."
Judge Napolitano can really sway peoples opinions. He doesn't have to sway mine. I am already an Austrian. I became more Libertarian than Conservative over the last few years.
My personal Modern Hero, this is the only man in pubic view courageous enough 2-B courageous! That's possible because he KNOWS his subject, therefore possesses the confidence and self-respect it takes to:
Conduct this forthright lecture involving these students, teaches & informs, provides answers, and ...everyone is very glad they were there & a helluvalot better illiterated about our U.S. Constitution & its history than when they got there!
@volwolf - if more people agreed edand demanded, the judges would have no choice, they have a sworn Oath to uphold the cons-titution, but the bums today are busy lining their pocets using the Court Registry Investment System, C.R.I.S. where they get 30% of every case towards their retirement fund.
@volwolf -if more people agreed and demanded, the judges would have no choice, they have a sworn Oath to uphold the cons-titution, but the bums today are busy lining their pocets using the Court Registry Investment System, C.R.I.S. where they get 30% of every case towards their retirement fund.
In that last statement, doesn't he show that the government indeed fears the people, because they want to get reelected and thus fear to lose their power? Wouldn't that mean that right now people in the USA are actually living in a free society then? That somehow seems to contradict the tone of his entire speech... anyone?
Just thought I'd clarify; no, it is not a free society, as the government does not truly fear the people. You see, they get re-elected not through protecting the freedom of the people, but by creating a public trough from which they give handouts (I don't mean welfare checks here). This satiates public greed and gets them re-elected, not even considering that many people are simply apathetic and will not vote for someone based on the issues.
The Constitution of the United States, if Jeffereson were here today to speak to our times he would say ( during our present distress let us not focus on our differences or on those things that assign Blame ,rather let us reinstitute the founding principles which has made our republic great , at present return to sound money and release commerce from restrictive devises abolish all central banking and return to small institutions of sufficient capital reserves with competing interest rates)
@openURmindsEye that would be a dream ticket! OMG..please Jesus(i know im atheist)but if your out there please please make this happen,i swear i'll never watch internet porn again!
@openURmindsEye, I liked what one in the audience implied: the Judge being nominated to be on the highest court in the land by Paul, which seems to make more sense, not that the idea you (and others) have promulgated doesn't have any merit.
Napolitano's opinion is the same as ayn rands argument against collectivism and reflects the key understanding that a gov whose charter is for the "public good" or "the most good for the most people" is on a course for fascism and totalitarianism, for this same gov will define what this "good" is. the focus must always be on what is best for the individual. what is best for the individual is best for the people. what is best for the "group" is best for the gov...and the enemy of the people.
This guy is a true American hero! He's the only guy I can think of on Fox who will even dare to mention the bilderberg group, the trilateral commission, the cfr, the federal reserve, etc... By acknowledging the whole truth we can defeat this profound wickedness that wants to usher in a one world dictatorship.
if a theif came to your house, stole your things, and gave you an excuse like, well, i need the money to feed my children, or, i just lost my job and i need a break, or, i'm going to give the money to charity, would you let him keep your things? probably not, but we let government get away with this all the time, why? the illusion that government is more righteous than your common theif perhaps. fear of just how powerful government is. how did government get falsely associated with altruism is
human beings have many fears and desires, we have alrtuism (the desire to sacrifice ourselves or our neighbours for the greater good), mutualism (eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, one hand washes the other), and egoism (sacrificing the greater good for me). saying the laws of trees exist before trees came into existence is absurd, so is saying our codes of conduct exist before we concieve of them. government claims it desires the greater good more than you do, but how do you know?
our rights don't come from god, they come from our natural fear of death, our desire to be free, our courage to stand up for ourselves and others and our ability to articulate these fears and desires. at least that's what i think. they don't exist prior to people, but at the moment they concieve of and declare them. but within us also exists the desire to protect the greater good, which sometimes comes into conflict with our other desires, so we try to satisfy both desires as best we can.
Napolitano is the only person that I think is smarter than Ron Paul in the freedom movement. I love Paul but even the Judge knows Austrian economics as well as he knows the law when he talks about it. It takes a life time of studying to become as smart and informed as the Judge.
it is not abstract there is such a thing as truth...not everything is based on point of veiw in fact either something is or it is not...I AM FREE...DON'T TREAD ON ME
Facts don’t have the power to change our minds. Quite the opposite. When misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news, they became more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts were not curing misinformation and actually made misinformation stronger.
This effect is heightened by the information glut, it’s never been easier for people to be wrong, and at the same time feel more certain that they’re right.
@Zaphodox We will have more like him entering politics just like when our country was founded and the farmers, businessmen and ministers said "enough is enough" and pledged their lives to FREEDOM!
Non compliance is only a partial solution, sadly, only a tiny percentage do not have their brains hard wired to The Beast™.
The ONLY vote that is counted is your wallet, use it wisely.
The heydays of being intellectually lazy has reared immeasurable destruction, it must end or humanity is destined to become programmable automatons, flesh robots to amuse soulless inbred overlords.
It is almost that way already, time is short, get smart.
Where do you begin? I know what can fix it. WE THE PEOPLE purchased enough weapons in one year to create the 4th largest army. Thank you 2nd amendment.--I find it interesting that he leads with some British Monarchy talk, and we are in fact living with Admiralty Law. Out of the Articles of the Confederation, we get a Constitutions that leaves out the recalling of "representatives". Go figure huh. BY THE WAY, the Constitution was killed OPENLY with the P-Act. Start there. 911 was a coup.
I've looked through the Biden/Scalia conversations at Scalia's confirmation hearing but I can't find that dialogue Napolitano quotes at about 55:00 in this talk. Any help?
However he and Ron Paul have proven that you don't need to be president - the job's just a posture anyways - to make a HUGE impact on the public. They are like Johnny Appleseeds, throwing millions of seeds of common sense to wherever they will grow.
@1111news He would never win the election. Don't get me wrong I've tremendous respect for the man, and Ron Paul, and the other diamonds in the rough. But I believe the voting system is rigged, the table is tilted, at every level. watch?v=0nPSBnnbD9o lays out one reason of several why neither will be elected. Even if they were they'd be shot by sundown.
Our only hope is a nonviolent march of several million people on DC prepared to camp out for as long as it takes to reform the system.
@zapproowsdower You're a moron. Show me one instance in history that actually did just that and bring about lasting freedom, prosperity and a government of the people, by the people and for the people. And Gandhi didn't really do anything so he doesn't count.
If you don't physically remove these people from office, you will be eating your own vomit and drinking your own piss in 10 years.
Camping in front of DC didn't do jack shit in ending the war and it won't for anything else. Period.
In 2009, the Federal Reserve engineered 20+ trillion dollar bailouts equaled 40% of the private wealth created in the US since 1776.
The US Office of Management and Budget reports that for the next 70 years the US will experience deficits of tens of trillions of dollars and will not have one year with a budget surplus.
The Federal Reserve reports the private net worth in the US is $53.4 trillion. US debt and unfunded liabilities are $120 trillion or $389,610 for each US citizen. Dozens of states are bankrupt.
In 2010, the US federal deficit will be $1.6 trillion.
The US government overspends by $4.38+ billion per day.
Since 1913, the Federal Reserve has devalued the US dollar by 98+%.
And that reminds me: considering the possibility of a broadened economic downturn, and the frustrations of those remaining drivers who'll be forced to drive behind slow moving bikes, how can roads be widened for bike/pedestrian lanes if eminent domain can't be applied at least at the state level? Is there another solution?
@bajoverga he should do some weights. He posts health articles. He's got quite a bit to lose and if he did it without adding muscle he'd be the epitome of "skinny fat". He'd look like he was terminally ill. He's the spitting image of my second cousin and he lost a bunch of weight through cardio and diet and he looks like shit.
This just shows how moronic the typical Joe public is....//.MY FRREDOM, IS UNWAVERING, BECAUSE IF SOMEONE THREATENS WHAT I BELIEVE IS MY RIGHT, ILL DIE IF NESESSARY , TO STOP HIM!
FOX, let us watch his show online!!!!!!
slimininin 20 hours ago
holy shit there's a mises university, I'm going there!!!!!!!!
slimininin 20 hours ago
so when is the judge going to run for president,i would vote for him for sure,by the way support ron paul or get fucked a little bit more ,a little bit harder by the system.
deadrekon10 1 day ago
What a great speaker.
HaLfDeAdArtist1 2 days ago
Freedom of mind, yes. Do you own your own body, yes. But why should property, something that you aquire under a million acts of chance and circumstance be respected the same way? The fucking Nike shoes you are wearing are probably the product of something similar to slave labour.
EquinoxIV 2 weeks ago
Dear Judge Napolitano
Will you please publicly decide if senate bill SBX211 is constitutional or not, and please explain why. I pray that you are not affaid to answer.
danielcooper1000 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What if Judge Napo was the only true voice in the today's media....
Thank You Judge, Ron Paul needs you.. We the People need you.
dstacey87 2 weeks ago
Ron Paul for president
Judge Napolitano Attorney General
albania614 3 weeks ago 5
My head has popped. Such an intrigueing speech.
mmoreo12 3 weeks ago
No Judge knows the constitution better than this man!!!!!
ironcitydevildog 3 weeks ago
Why isn't this guy on the Supreme court???? I guess to socialist President Obummer Alena Keggan is better and so is Soda Miore!!!! What an idiot!!!!
ironcitydevildog 3 weeks ago
Extraordinary speech.
frankcharles511 1 month ago
Who would dislike this?
miazagora 1 month ago
Fuck the constitution ! Give us some burritos !
mojoboy1984 1 month ago
skip to 19:20 for q&a
AnarchyEnsues 1 month ago
6 Congressmen watched this video.
NealFletcher 2 months ago 25
@NealFletcher 7
thebackbencher666 1 month ago
@NealFletcher make that 7
MrWompz 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look at all the white people!
TurdFergisson 2 months ago
Napolitano is a genious
tubingen92 2 months ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 2012
tr4nc3d 2 months ago
The Judge is very wise. A living legacy!
MissScarlett27 2 months ago 3
You cannot just demand change without offering a decent solution, lest not if you really expect change. I wish you should go back to the time when the U.S. Constitution was written, then you would be able to kiss your kings asx. I doubt you would risk your neck for your own rights, let alone the rights of others i.e. the second class citizens you speak of. Yet I have hope for you, after you've seen the world for what it is, you will beg for the rights this document has offered to us. @royalstcav
superlativeOFgood 2 months ago
@superlativeOFgood I have far more respect for kings and monarchy then I do have for republics. In my oppion Kings are far more braver then elected presidents. In history you see many kings like William I, Harold I,Richard I, Edward I, Richard III and Henry VII who personally fought on the battle field with their troops and in the cases of Harold I, Richard I and Richard III died on the battle field. They did not flee from danger like presidents like James Madison. Presidents like to say safe.
RoyalistCavalier 2 months ago
@RoyalistCavalier Just like I said, YOU are a coward. You are also one of the many circle talkers that keep changing the subject instead of facing the responses directly. Please stop slamming the U.S.A.using our DOD ARPANET created systems (U.S. invention) and just use the systems that your countrymen invented. Is there one?
By the way you're drawing on over a thousand years of royalty and you come up with six. lol. Which ones fought in the 20th century?
True colors, I feel sorry for you now
superlativeOFgood 2 months ago
Judge Andrew Napolitano should realise how disgusting and hypocrital the Constitution is. The Consitution never allowed women to vote until 1920. If the Constituion meant what is says, then the United States should have had women governors, mayors, senators, representives, secetaries and presidents and vice presidents as early as it's independece, but it did not. The Constituion belongs in the trash bin. Slave owners such as Washington and Jefferson have no right to speak about freedom/liberty.
RoyalistCavalier 2 months ago
@RoyalistCavalier If you rip up the Constitution do not hold up the shreds for protection. If you are not a U.S. citizen, you really have no say in this, and I for one do not care what you think. (about our Constitution)
superlativeOFgood 2 months ago
@superlativeOFgood The Constitution did not protect blacks, Indians and women from being treated as 2nd class citizens. The Constitution only gave freedom and liberty to landed white men. This fact alone is why the United States Constitution must be dumped int the trash bin of history and a new one written by people who are not plantation slave owners such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. A plantation slave owner talking about libery is like a Nazi talking about Jewish rights.
RoyalistCavalier 2 months ago
@RoyalistCavalier I agree that all people should have been considered, however you cannot start a new constitution without using the flawed government we have today. Who do you believe would be qualified to write it today, and if you have a good answer, what if others prefer a choice you don't care for. For better or worse this is the document we have. As for the "property of men" I blame the bible and the history of western civilization for their contemporary views.
superlativeOFgood 2 months ago
@superlativeOFgood The flawed government that the United States is a direct result of the Constitution. I love how Constitutionalists complain that the United States is run by the corporations and big buisness, well it has always been like this. Many of the people who wrote the Constitution were what we can call speciali interest groups such as George Washington who was a planter and Alexander Hamilton who was a banker. Alexander Hamilton would be a big fan of the Federal Reserve.
RoyalistCavalier 2 months ago
@superlativeOFgood The founding fathers of the United States who talked and preached about liberty and equality and freedoms themselves did not live up to their ideals. Liberty and freedoms were denied to women, Indians and blacks and I do recall that John Adams (Hero of Constituionalists) himself created the Alien and Seditious Acts which put people in jail for excersing freedom of speech. The founding fathers did not want freedom and liberty fro the lower classes but wanted all the power.
RoyalistCavalier 2 months ago
@superlativeOFgood Now this is a real shame that women only got the right to vote in 1920, which is so wrong and shows you how pathetic and hypocrital the Constitution was and is. The men who wrote the Constitution only applied liberty and rights to white men, women were treated little more then property of the men. Now I would have had more respect for the Constituion if it meant what is says and women should have been allowed to run for president and other offices as soon as it was signed.
RoyalistCavalier 2 months ago
@superlativeOFgood The United States Constitution allowed the institution of slavery to flourish and did nothing to abolish it until the 1860's and that only happend because of the American civil war. The politicans in the south and the vas majority of the people not only did not support the abolishment of slavery but fought to keep it alive at the cost of about a milliond dead. Which was it, the Constitution or the Bill of Rights which declared a black person 3/5 of worth to a white person.
RoyalistCavalier 2 months ago
smart guy alright, however everyone one of his arguments can be considered debatable, to either side. Healthcare for example, and capitalism can in fact co-exist, if only the greed facotr were tempered, in direct proporation to need. Period.
tommyg524 2 months ago
This is what I thought law school was going to be like... too bad it wasn't.
RustyIronloins 3 months ago
I WISH I WAS THERE
pureaggression 3 months ago
I don't know if I'm more in awe of his intelligence or his hair line
kairu35 3 months ago
This is a tremendously-important sort of presentation. However, I sadly note my opinion that the Judge here appears to greatly sell himself short by appearing unduly flattered at the mere thought of his being nominated to the Supreme Court by Ron Paul, were the latter elected President. Rather, I think the judge should think about what he might say or write under the much more ambitious scenario wherein the rewriting of the Constitution of the United State of America is the task set before him!
reestablishusa 3 months ago
It's about time the Spirit of the law takes precedent over the letter.
eyewitness043 3 months ago
Napolitano, Paul, Rockwell, Woods... The Refounders... I am so grateful to have these gentlemen to learn from, and for the Mises Institute providing them such a great venue to teach from.
TheLibertyMinute 4 months ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
herman cain brought pizza made my a nigger company based on italian pie
lol
ask this guy if he has a kenyan born birthcertificate
pied piper at the gates of dawn businessman if i ever saw one!
SuperMegaUberGenius 4 months ago
Judge Napolitano would've been the best Founding Father in 1787!
hanyangwe 4 months ago
What is so freaky is that teabaggers who call themselves libertarians have no idea what Austrian Economics is and who Von Mises was. Objectivists would. Ayn Rand did. "Libertarians", fake ones, somehow think Ayn Rand was a Libertarian or a fake Republican like Ron Paul. Paul is the only real, effective Libertarian. Rand hated libertarianism and she hated Ronald Reagan. Unfortunately, she would have also hated EDDIE MUNSTER here, Judge Napolitano. These Alabamans probably think Mises was German.
eqsmooth 4 months ago
It's good stuff but will it stop the NWO.
If we were at 1776 we would have confidence to reply -Yes.
In 2011 it will take a lot more then Fine Words and Ideal Sentiment to confront the enthroned evil of the NWO
Note, the NWO is no King George III.
If you want Liberty we will need to wrestle the power back and that my fellow citizens will involve Mega Death and an Irradiated World and the end of everything we hold dear. It's one Hell of a mess and there are no soft options.
BigBillie01 5 months ago
great speech.
flowewritharoma 5 months ago
I know the two men who get my vote, providing the "Council of 13" doesn't make this country a dictatorship before the election. Check the Alex Jones channel on the super congress.
Greyhawkism 5 months ago
@Greyhawkism Please don't pollute the LVMI institute's page / Judge Napolitano with some Alex Jones conspiracy nuttiness.
oldstyleliberal 5 months ago
@oldstyleliberal No problem. Just dislike me and don't listen to me.
Greyhawkism 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@oldstyleliberal FUCK YOU... INFOWARS.com
hanyangwe 4 months ago
36: 23 BAM *NAPOLITANO FOREHEAD*
Killerjosh89 6 months ago
I want to "like" this more than once.... ARGH!
RustyIronloins 6 months ago 3
He should have been put into Beck's 5:00pm slot!!!
fredhart 6 months ago
only 3 neo-socia-con-nazi's It's Ron Pauls time now.
kydenj28 6 months ago 2
want freedom? go back to the days before the constitution, you all praise, was written
longfootbuddy 6 months ago
I see no teleprompter!!! we need you in high office sir, you and ron paul will change the face of this country for the better FOREVER!!
Killmodecapitalism 6 months ago 2
I'm British and have seen clips of this man, but until I saw this I never realized just how knowledgeable and intelligent he is. A man of integrity.
danmarder1 7 months ago 4
Actually, taxation is extortion.
joebananatube 7 months ago 3
Ron Paul said it, "Judge Andrew Napolitano - My VICE PRESIDENT."
Paulitics2012 7 months ago 4
That was amazing.
RKAddict101 7 months ago
@deficithawker Are you expecting a certain kind of answer? I say none, I believe it has to do with the fact that if someone commits a wrong according to one state's laws, and they escape to another state whose laws do not bar him from his past action, he must be transported back to the previous state for due process.
RKAddict101 7 months ago
We need Andrew Napolitano sitting on the Supreme Court. I love this guy.
57girl 7 months ago 4
the two people who dislike this lack any sort of cranial development whatsoever.
wheresmattburns 8 months ago 69
@wheresmattburns It's up to three now. It was thumbed down by David Rockefeller, Nancy Pelosi and Satan.
VincenzoB81 5 months ago 4
@VincenzoB81 Satan? I was gonna say Joe Biden.
rsaettone 5 months ago
@wheresmattburns Actually, it would be the THREE people now
rsaettone 5 months ago
TheConstitution=Under8D.
=
V4Victory ~
=
TLC
PapaLuvTLC 8 months ago
Why would anyone dislike this? I don't care which party you belong to, you can't argue with his points unless you abdicate logic.
PiratesWonderful 8 months ago
This man is a walking library of U.S. history. This subject should be a high school requirement with a passing grade of at least 80%.
katnap72 9 months ago
That girl in the backrow is cute
PoetsLight 9 months ago 3
It doesn't get any better than this. AND I HAVE HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF VOTING AGAINST CONGRESSMAN JAMES CLYBURN FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS, TO NO AVAIL. He has got the people in SC who he supposedly represents DUPED !!!! Thank the Good Lord for the likes of JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO.
God Bless The Judge, and God Bless America. Please post on FACEBOOK....
decendant1776 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My goal is to one day be able to speak like him and know as much as he does in order to be bale to show people why liberty truly mean!
el3ment77 9 months ago
Comment removed
el3ment77 9 months ago
Where is his teleprompter? Doesn't the Judge need one of these speech conveniences too.?
ClutchPedalReturnSpr 9 months ago
Stop the bribes to the judges of California. Los Angeles County judges are receiving $57,688.00 per year per judge. That is on top of the pay and benefits they already receive from the STATE.
Sturgeon v Los Angels County declared those payments to be unconstitutional. Granting judges RETRO ACTIVE IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION for taking bribes under SBX211 is unconstitutional. LOSS OF DUE PROCCESS, FRAUD ON THE COURT.
Nobody should be above the LAW
(SEE) HOW TO DISQUALIFY YOUR JUDGE
danielcooper1000 9 months ago
"When the Mustang Ranch in Nevada was taken over by the IRS for failure to pay income taxes and the Government ran it, they bankrupted it. So let me get this straight..," "the Government can't provide booze and hookers to truckers in the desert and they want to manage health care!?" - Judge
RebelConserve 9 months ago
His "secular argument" sounds a lot like what Marx felt was missing from the capitalist system.
mrshfnch 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, and safe, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some say they hear, do it.
jamestargetedindiv 9 months ago
Is there a missing 13th amendment? Anyone have a link? Judge Nap. or Congressman Paul for Pesident!!!
HiawathaMohawk 10 months ago
Judge Napolitano for President!!!
bertonenj1989 10 months ago
44:20 I may have just jizzed my pants, I can't believe someone else HATES the 17th Amendment as much as I do!
youskinfan 11 months ago
Napolitano is the truth.
dskillz1 11 months ago
"This is the greatest academic institution on the planet for the study of freedom, bar none." :-)
OutlawCongress 11 months ago
26:36 "Judge, I think you're an anarchist and you don't know it yet?"
>> Napolitano: "Do you hear me denying anything?"
HELL YEAH!
PJCelis 11 months ago 20
@PJCelis The Judge and Paul are, if not anarchists themselves, at least not opposed to anarchism. Unlike many 'minarchists' they realise that there is nothing wrong with people choosing to eschew all coercion, even if it isn't 'stable'
OutlawCongress 11 months ago
@PJCelis I was wondering what was said....couldn't hear it....
richarcm 2 months ago
This should be required study by all high school students. Judge Napolitano has a perfect understanding of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The U.S. Supreme Court needs to hear this as well as all of Congress.
TheRoadrocket 11 months ago
@TheRoadrocket Actually, it is arguable that the Constitution is anti-libertarian - after all, it was written by East Coast elites, passed illegally, supported by the Mercantalist-Centralist Federalists and sponsored by banksters. The Judge has a libertarian interpretation of the Constitution, but that doesn't make it the correct one.
OutlawCongress 11 months ago
@OutlawCongress I guess all the West Coast elites were busy in 1787 To bad Obama wasnt around, he would have told them "now let me be clear, we need to get this Constitution ratified up in here."
logan6298 11 months ago
McCain and Obama didn't like this video...
Forsakren 1 year ago
You guys are lucky to have a guy like that speak to you a true American. This man is always right. I love this Judge.
shartne 1 year ago
Why can't we have an impartial and constitutional president in office? When was the last time we had a president like that?
Jidster01 1 year ago 2
@Jidster01 Arguably Eisenhower, probably Coolidge...
youskinfan 11 months ago
He's a right wing tool!
The73mopar 1 year ago
@The73mopar and you're a down right dumbass
xodis911 1 year ago
@The73mopar Left wingers just don't seem to understand common sense. You prove that.
ValhallaC9 11 months ago
He quotes extensively and easily, something that Theodore Roosevelt was renowned for.. hehehe
izlrux101 1 year ago
I've watched this 3 or 4 times already...this guy needs to be on the Supreme Court
Sonnedude 1 year ago
Paul, Napolitano 2012
ronpaulfan1 1 year ago 2
Ron Paul and Judge Andrew Napolitano in 2012!
edarotag84 1 year ago
He should be sacked. go to live leak & put this at the end of the address to watch an informative video. /view?i=779_1292878102
peacemaker083 1 year ago
Judge Napolitano can really sway peoples opinions. He doesn't have to sway mine. I am already an Austrian. I became more Libertarian than Conservative over the last few years.
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
My personal Modern Hero, this is the only man in pubic view courageous enough 2-B courageous! That's possible because he KNOWS his subject, therefore possesses the confidence and self-respect it takes to:
Conduct this forthright lecture involving these students, teaches & informs, provides answers, and ...everyone is very glad they were there & a helluvalot better illiterated about our U.S. Constitution & its history than when they got there!
I LOVED this class! Love the Judge! ^_~\\
evernetherall 1 year ago
If only more judges agreed with the views held by Judge Napolitano. This was an excellent presentation.
volwolf 1 year ago
@volwolf - if more people agreed edand demanded, the judges would have no choice, they have a sworn Oath to uphold the cons-titution, but the bums today are busy lining their pocets using the Court Registry Investment System, C.R.I.S. where they get 30% of every case towards their retirement fund.
ngonea 1 year ago
@volwolf -if more people agreed and demanded, the judges would have no choice, they have a sworn Oath to uphold the cons-titution, but the bums today are busy lining their pocets using the Court Registry Investment System, C.R.I.S. where they get 30% of every case towards their retirement fund.
ngonea 1 year ago
25:33 Judge Napolitano FTW!
joekiddone 1 year ago
I love at 48.36 where he says "when the government fails to protect your FREEDOM; it is the DUTY of the people to alter or abolish it".
ProudConservative2 1 year ago
In that last statement, doesn't he show that the government indeed fears the people, because they want to get reelected and thus fear to lose their power? Wouldn't that mean that right now people in the USA are actually living in a free society then? That somehow seems to contradict the tone of his entire speech... anyone?
gerbennap 1 year ago
@gerbennap
Just thought I'd clarify; no, it is not a free society, as the government does not truly fear the people. You see, they get re-elected not through protecting the freedom of the people, but by creating a public trough from which they give handouts (I don't mean welfare checks here). This satiates public greed and gets them re-elected, not even considering that many people are simply apathetic and will not vote for someone based on the issues.
ajmj120 1 year ago
The Constitution of the United States, if Jeffereson were here today to speak to our times he would say ( during our present distress let us not focus on our differences or on those things that assign Blame ,rather let us reinstitute the founding principles which has made our republic great , at present return to sound money and release commerce from restrictive devises abolish all central banking and return to small institutions of sufficient capital reserves with competing interest rates)
jhunted7667 1 year ago
Ron Paul and Judge Napolitano 2012!!!
openURmindsEye 1 year ago 79
Comment removed
katnap72 9 months ago
@openURmindsEye that would be a dream ticket! OMG..please Jesus(i know im atheist)but if your out there please please make this happen,i swear i'll never watch internet porn again!
ShOwStOpp3rr 4 months ago
@openURmindsEye, I liked what one in the audience implied: the Judge being nominated to be on the highest court in the land by Paul, which seems to make more sense, not that the idea you (and others) have promulgated doesn't have any merit.
adfowlkes71 3 months ago
Napolitano's opinion is the same as ayn rands argument against collectivism and reflects the key understanding that a gov whose charter is for the "public good" or "the most good for the most people" is on a course for fascism and totalitarianism, for this same gov will define what this "good" is. the focus must always be on what is best for the individual. what is best for the individual is best for the people. what is best for the "group" is best for the gov...and the enemy of the people.
knowthingman 1 year ago
It's really refreshing to see people reacting so positively to someone because of IDEAS, not a cult of personality.
pretorious700 1 year ago 6
This guy is a true American hero! He's the only guy I can think of on Fox who will even dare to mention the bilderberg group, the trilateral commission, the cfr, the federal reserve, etc... By acknowledging the whole truth we can defeat this profound wickedness that wants to usher in a one world dictatorship.
ericjaynelson 1 year ago 3
Someone should make Sarah Palin a martye :)
ObamaIsDaAntiChrist 1 year ago
EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS, THE SENATE, AND EVERY JUDGE SHOULD WATCH THIS.
EASHER4936 1 year ago
One United States Senator has watched this video!
LibertyMike1 1 year ago
Who clicked thumbs down???
longbeachboy57 1 year ago 2
beyond me.
occultologist 1 year ago
if a theif came to your house, stole your things, and gave you an excuse like, well, i need the money to feed my children, or, i just lost my job and i need a break, or, i'm going to give the money to charity, would you let him keep your things? probably not, but we let government get away with this all the time, why? the illusion that government is more righteous than your common theif perhaps. fear of just how powerful government is. how did government get falsely associated with altruism is
occultologist 1 year ago
human beings have many fears and desires, we have alrtuism (the desire to sacrifice ourselves or our neighbours for the greater good), mutualism (eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, one hand washes the other), and egoism (sacrificing the greater good for me). saying the laws of trees exist before trees came into existence is absurd, so is saying our codes of conduct exist before we concieve of them. government claims it desires the greater good more than you do, but how do you know?
occultologist 1 year ago
our rights don't come from god, they come from our natural fear of death, our desire to be free, our courage to stand up for ourselves and others and our ability to articulate these fears and desires. at least that's what i think. they don't exist prior to people, but at the moment they concieve of and declare them. but within us also exists the desire to protect the greater good, which sometimes comes into conflict with our other desires, so we try to satisfy both desires as best we can.
occultologist 1 year ago
Napolitano is the only person that I think is smarter than Ron Paul in the freedom movement. I love Paul but even the Judge knows Austrian economics as well as he knows the law when he talks about it. It takes a life time of studying to become as smart and informed as the Judge.
rmccay88 1 year ago
ron paul / judge nap 2012
mattbaldea 1 year ago
that was amazing!
mattbaldea 1 year ago
it is not abstract there is such a thing as truth...not everything is based on point of veiw in fact either something is or it is not...I AM FREE...DON'T TREAD ON ME
frogman92981 1 year ago
I was there! it was AMAZING!
carlosafi669 1 year ago
I was there! it was AMAZING!
carlosafi669 1 year ago
amazing
frogman92981 1 year ago
his palin is perfect
frogman92981 1 year ago
this is awesome
frogman92981 1 year ago
Like talking to a stone - How facts backfire
Facts don’t have the power to change our minds. Quite the opposite. When misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news, they became more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts were not curing misinformation and actually made misinformation stronger.
This effect is heightened by the information glut, it’s never been easier for people to be wrong, and at the same time feel more certain that they’re right.
floydsgarage 1 year ago
Wow I had no idea the Espionage Act is still law.
CarrotManShow 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
JoeRyMi 1 year ago
his presentation and speaking abilities are incredible.
TeamZissou88 1 year ago 49
@TeamZissou88 Why can't we have politicans like this man? its what the world needs!
Zaphodox 1 year ago
@Zaphodox We will have more like him entering politics just like when our country was founded and the farmers, businessmen and ministers said "enough is enough" and pledged their lives to FREEDOM!
ProudConservative2 1 year ago
@TeamZissou88 he's a judge of course
ZIRCHxWORLD 11 months ago
Andrew Napolitano FTW.
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We need YOUR help in Cedar Rapids Iowa PLEASE
sibzianna 1 year ago
Great preacher!
FB1801 1 year ago
oh, 29:16 I LOL'd.
latveria1024 1 year ago
Excellent
MeCallCrazy 1 year ago
Alexander hamilton was right. All you guys need to be controlled because ur dumb
Freedom21stCenturi 1 year ago
Non compliance is only a partial solution, sadly, only a tiny percentage do not have their brains hard wired to The Beast™.
The ONLY vote that is counted is your wallet, use it wisely.
The heydays of being intellectually lazy has reared immeasurable destruction, it must end or humanity is destined to become programmable automatons, flesh robots to amuse soulless inbred overlords.
It is almost that way already, time is short, get smart.
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
Abolish the Federal State!
randyguitarman13 1 year ago
Interesting, the secular arguments on how we have our rights is pure Ayn Rand,
guess she covered the non-religious basis.
elricmlbone 1 year ago
Thought leaders like Napolitano, Woods, Rockwell, Paul, et al have a real chance of leading this country to recovery.
4thstuning 1 year ago 40
@4thstuning - you forgot Nader
wudupnigga808 1 year ago
@4thstuning Sure they do. After it's complete collapse.
Rensune 11 months ago
Where do you begin? I know what can fix it. WE THE PEOPLE purchased enough weapons in one year to create the 4th largest army. Thank you 2nd amendment.--I find it interesting that he leads with some British Monarchy talk, and we are in fact living with Admiralty Law. Out of the Articles of the Confederation, we get a Constitutions that leaves out the recalling of "representatives". Go figure huh. BY THE WAY, the Constitution was killed OPENLY with the P-Act. Start there. 911 was a coup.
bigc028282 1 year ago
I've looked through the Biden/Scalia conversations at Scalia's confirmation hearing but I can't find that dialogue Napolitano quotes at about 55:00 in this talk. Any help?
jrnewma1 1 year ago
"O Reilly is the pinhead.
JBSCOLORADO2 1 year ago
However he and Ron Paul have proven that you don't need to be president - the job's just a posture anyways - to make a HUGE impact on the public. They are like Johnny Appleseeds, throwing millions of seeds of common sense to wherever they will grow.
zapproowsdower 1 year ago 4
@1111news He would never win the election. Don't get me wrong I've tremendous respect for the man, and Ron Paul, and the other diamonds in the rough. But I believe the voting system is rigged, the table is tilted, at every level. watch?v=0nPSBnnbD9o lays out one reason of several why neither will be elected. Even if they were they'd be shot by sundown.
Our only hope is a nonviolent march of several million people on DC prepared to camp out for as long as it takes to reform the system.
zapproowsdower 1 year ago
@zapproowsdower You're a moron. Show me one instance in history that actually did just that and bring about lasting freedom, prosperity and a government of the people, by the people and for the people. And Gandhi didn't really do anything so he doesn't count.
If you don't physically remove these people from office, you will be eating your own vomit and drinking your own piss in 10 years.
Camping in front of DC didn't do jack shit in ending the war and it won't for anything else. Period.
Vigatos 1 year ago
Napolitano speaks, I get chills up my spine.
I love this man!
eagleeye1975 1 year ago
Judge Andrew Napolitano rocks. Great speaker. Clever audience manipulator.
TruthAxe 1 year ago
You tell'em, Jedge!
JiveDadson 1 year ago
ohcanadamovie com
singledad1234 1 year ago
In 2009, the Federal Reserve engineered 20+ trillion dollar bailouts equaled 40% of the private wealth created in the US since 1776.
The US Office of Management and Budget reports that for the next 70 years the US will experience deficits of tens of trillions of dollars and will not have one year with a budget surplus.
hplaserjet2001 1 year ago
The Federal Reserve reports the private net worth in the US is $53.4 trillion. US debt and unfunded liabilities are $120 trillion or $389,610 for each US citizen. Dozens of states are bankrupt.
In 2010, the US federal deficit will be $1.6 trillion.
The US government overspends by $4.38+ billion per day.
Since 1913, the Federal Reserve has devalued the US dollar by 98+%.
hplaserjet2001 1 year ago
This video is awesome
BlackAdderLXX 1 year ago
Ron Paul = PREZ
Judge Napolitano = VICE
Secretary of the Treasury - Tom Woods, Max Keiser, Peter Schiff
and....
NO FED
vdofam 1 year ago
spread the word
LibertyPoet website
campaign4liberty 1 year ago 2
Paul/Napolitano 2012
sgalt1981 1 year ago
Damn Lew is getting old...love him to death though.
bajoverga 1 year ago
@bajoverga
Seems like he needs more walking and less driving. It is important that he stays healthy :-)
LibertaerUeberAlles 1 year ago
@LibertaerUeberAlles
And that reminds me: considering the possibility of a broadened economic downturn, and the frustrations of those remaining drivers who'll be forced to drive behind slow moving bikes, how can roads be widened for bike/pedestrian lanes if eminent domain can't be applied at least at the state level? Is there another solution?
LibertaerUeberAlles 1 year ago 2
@bajoverga he should do some weights. He posts health articles. He's got quite a bit to lose and if he did it without adding muscle he'd be the epitome of "skinny fat". He'd look like he was terminally ill. He's the spitting image of my second cousin and he lost a bunch of weight through cardio and diet and he looks like shit.
cacapoopoo2327 1 year ago
@cacapoopoo2327 I'm referring to Lew.
cacapoopoo2327 1 year ago
CAN YOU BELIEVE WHAT THE AUDIENCE SAYS ???
13AJJONES 1 year ago
This just shows how moronic the typical Joe public is....//.MY FRREDOM, IS UNWAVERING, BECAUSE IF SOMEONE THREATENS WHAT I BELIEVE IS MY RIGHT, ILL DIE IF NESESSARY , TO STOP HIM!
That is how I remain a loyal American Patriot !
13AJJONES 1 year ago